Feed aggregator

The WatchOS 27 public beta is here, and Apple's revamped assistant finally does what Siri should have been doing all along.

• Apple has ended a popular loophole used when buying an iPhone
• It previously let you get an unlocked iPhone on carrier finance
• The workaround still works when purchasing an iPad

For many years, there’s been something of an open secret among Apple fans who want to get a new, fully unlocked iPhone deal with affordable carrier financing. Now, though, Apple has ended this workaround, much to the dismay of the Apple userbase — but there’s better news if you’re thinking of getting an iPad on finance.

The iPhone loophole worked like this. While buying an iPhone on finance from a carrier usually meant it was locked to that provider, buying the same device straight from Apple’s website — even when using carrier financing — got you an unlocked phone.

This applied to both T-Mobile and Verizon contracts, although AT&T users were still locked to their carrier. It meant that you could get the benefit of a generous financing offer or trade-in deal without having to stick with one carrier until your device was paid off.

Now, Apple has changed its terms. In the Frequently Asked Questions section on any iPhone purchase page, Apple has inserted some new language: “If you choose to finance an iPhone through the AT&T Installment Plan, T-Mobile Equipment Installment Plan, or Verizon Device Payment Program, your iPhone will be locked to the carrier until paid in full.”

The change hasn’t gone down well with Apple users, who have been lamenting the more restrictive practices that are now in force. On Reddit, comments have ranged from “no idea why carrier locking is still legal,” while another posted commented that the situation is “sad, I was buying phones this way since 2022.”

This situation is not present in every country. Since December 2021 in the UK, regulators have prohibited mobile networks from selling new handsets that are locked to their network. Go to Apple’s UK online store and you won’t see the wording about an iPhone being locked or unlocked.

Better news for iPad buyers

(Image credit: Future/Jacob Krol)

If you’re still interested in getting an Apple device on finance, there’s another option, as Apple has just introduced a 36-month option when buying any of the best iPads equipped with Wi-Fi and cellular connectivity direct from Apple. This offer appears at checkout on Apple’s website and is available for the iPad, iPad mini, iPad Air and iPad Pro.

While Apple offers interest-free financing using Apple Card, that spreads the cost over 12 months. The 36-month option means your monthly repayments will be lower, although you also have to factor in the additional cost of cellular service and any extras like an activation fee.

Your current options are AT&T or Verizon. Interestingly, though, you won’t be locked to the carrier while the repayment period is ongoing, as Apple says “You can switch carriers when you purchase an iPad directly from Apple and choose carrier financing as your payment option.” That makes this iPad deal very similar to the recently shuttered iPhone workaround, and it’s unknown if or when Apple will end this loophole.

Aside from Apple, you can also buy an iPad with a 36-month financing plan from carriers. And as noted by AppleInsider, this sometimes involves bill credit or other offers that lower the cost of the iPad, meaning you could get a better deal by not going through Apple itself — although doing so likely means you’ll be locked into using that carrier, rather than being free to switch when buying from Apple. As ever with this sort of thing, shop around to see if you can get a bargain.

• GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen says Sony's decision to end physical game production is 'totally irrelevant' to the company
• The statement is supported by both physical and digital games, which only contribute 18% to overall revenue
• Cohen's comments likely won't help gamers in their push to retain physical game discs

The backlash against Sony continues after its controversial choice to stop new physical disc production of PlayStation games from January 2028 and it looks like the US' biggest dedicated video game retailer isn't taking a stand.

In an interview with Bloomberg, GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen dismissed the idea that the company will be impacted by Sony's decision to end physical game copies, stating "it doesn't matter at all," despite ongoing uproar from consumers.

"It mattered in the past; software makes up less than 12% of the business," Cohen said. "Collectibles makes up over half of the business, so it's totally irrelevant."

Frankly, it's a harsh and cold stance, but it isn't exactly incorrect, as Bloomberg highlights that both physical and digital copies of games are only 18% of GameStop's total revenue. The store has mostly transitioned to a focus on collectibles like Pokémon cards, and that's evident the moment you visit its website.

(Image credit: Capcom / Future)

It's no secret that Sony's decision to end disc production in 2028 hasn't gone down well with most consumers, as many feel as though it's a direct threat to game ownership. A digital-only console means games (or other media) can be taken away from gamers at any time, and Sony has done that recently with over 500 purchased movies removed from user libraries.

Essentially, GameStop's reasoning for the end of game discs being irrelevant is similar to Sony's, as Sony highlighted the fact that most gamers are purchasing copies digitally in its announcement.

Despite that, the consensus among consumers is that the elimination of discs is quite unnecessary, only cutting off another option of purchase. It's also worth noting that prices for games on the PlayStation Store won't be as low as they would usually be via second-hand or video game retailers.

Sony has yet to address the matter since the announcement, even with the sheer amount of backlash it's receiving online, and gamers will likely be hoping that statements from CEOs like Cohen won't harm the fight to retain physical game copies.

Business presentations no longer require a heavy projector permanently mounted in a meeting room. Portable models have become a practical alternative for small businesses and even hybrid and home workers.

And right now, the Anker Nebula P1i projector is just $299 (was $369) at Amazon, making it a more affordable way to equip offices, client meetings, and shared workspaces. In the UK, Anker's portable projector is also discounted to £299 (was £370) at Amazon.

Now, at 380 ANSI lumens, it's not bright enough for watching the World Cup final unless you're watching in a dark room (or once the sunsets). But it ticks all the core boxes for a budget portable projector for presentations and screenings.

Today's top portable projector deal

Native 1080p resolution, 4K support, 380 ANSI lumens, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Google TV, autofocus, automatic keystone correction, and a durable all-glass lens make this portable projector ideal for presentations, training sessions, and entertainment.

In the UK: now £299 (was £370)View Deal

The Nebula P1i produces a native 1080p Full HD image with 4K content support and 380 ANSI lumens of TÜV-certified brightness. The sharp resolution makes presentations, spreadsheets, documents, and video content easy to view in smaller meeting rooms and collaborative spaces, and it's equally suited to home entertainment purposes.

Anker's IEA 3.0 technology automatically handles autofocus, keystone correction, screen fitting, and obstacle avoidance, allowing you to place the projector almost anywhere.

You can get started within seconds, rather than spending valuable time faffing around with settings before every meeting.

Connectivity is flexible thanks to Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, HDMI, and AUX, making it simple to connect laptops, wireless speakers, or other presentation equipment.

Built-in Google TV also gives you direct access to streaming services, which can be useful for training videos, demonstrations, and promotional content.

The hardware includes an all-glass lens, and a fully sealed optical engine helps to reduce dust build-up and support image quality.

Dual 10W Dolby Audio speakers rotate independently, so you can direct sound toward your audience, whether they're in a boardroom, classroom, or temporary workspace.

Although the P1i doesn't include an internal battery, its 7.3lb design remains portable enough to move between offices or take to client sites, and it can also be powered by a compatible portable power station for those locations lacking convenient mains access.

For the price, he Nebula P1i offers an attractive mix of Full HD resolution, automatic setup, durable optics, and flexible connectivity.

For small businesses, educators, and professionals who need a projector that's easy to transport and quick to setup, this is a terrific deal.

For more top picks, these are the best portable projectors we've tested and reviewed.

• See all projectors at Amazon

OpenAI has officially launched its first piece of hardware, and it's called the Codex Micro. It might sound like a retro computer in a Dan Brown book, but the Codex Micro is actually a very compact keyboard for coders.

How does that work? In this article we're going to dive into exactly what the Codex Micro is, and the point of the device, as well as how it aims to make life easier for programmers – and then we'll come on to the reaction of those coders (hold onto your hats, folks).

What is the Codex Micro?

(Image credit: OpenAI)

As already mentioned, it's a keyboard, but a keyboard with a very specific purpose. OpenAI produced this peripheral in conjunction with Work Louder, and it's actually a tiny keyboard – more of a keypad, if you will, or a 'macropad', in the same vein as pads that Work Louder has produced before, like the Creator Micro 2 – made for coders who are using Codex.

What's Codex? It's OpenAI's coding agent which can assist humans in writing programs, tackling debugging tasks, or indeed writing code from scratch prompted by simple natural language instructions (vibe coding, as it's known).

What does the Codex Micro do exactly?

(Image credit: OpenAI)

The idea with the Codex Micro is that you have a compact keyboard that easily allows you to switch between coding tasks (agents) with dedicated keys that have RGB lights to indicate their status at a glance. If there's an unread chat, you see a green light, or an orange one if user approval is needed, and so on.

There are other keys for voice dictation (hold and talk to give instructions – there isn't a built-in mic, by the way, this is triggering your laptop's microphone), a dial to adjust the reasoning level or how deeply the AI agent is thinking (though it can be changed to modify other options), and a joystick that you can map to what you need. The entire keyboard is fully customizable, it should be noted.

All of this is designed so that coders can quickly give instructions, see what's happening with agents and tasks at a glance, and swiftly switch between them, making changes in an easy and convenient way.

Who will buy the Codex Micro?

(Image credit: OpenAI)

Obviously enough, coders who use Codex are the target audience. Think of it this way: if Codex is a faster way of coding, OpenAI wants the Codex Micro to be a further hardware-based speed boost to this whole process.

It costs $230 in the US (around £170, AU$330), although it isn't yet in stock, and clearly this isn't a consumer-oriented device.

However, OpenAI does have plans for consumer hardware. If the rumor mill is to be believed, it could have a wearable in the works – or indeed a smart speaker, going by more recent speculation. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, this will be a smart speaker that uses mechanical elements to create a "sense that it is alive" and it'll tap your emails and other personal data to better "understand" you. Sounds frightening, right? Truly scary. It is, however, just a rumor.

What's the general reaction to the Codex Micro from programmers?

That smart speaker I just mentioned has already prompted a good deal of antagonistic reaction, and looking at the posts about the Codex Micro, it isn't faring much better than that rumored creation.

Notably there are a number of Redditors who are questioning whether this is April 1, and some kind of joke. There's quite a lot of shoulder-shrugging going on, or observations that you can easily buy a cheap macropad and DIY your own solution along these lines for a tenth of the price OpenAI is charging. Or indeed that there could just be a simple phone app version of this product (with on-screen buttons and sliders).

As one Redditor puts it: "Yeah it's like every big tech product now. Instead of a full keyboard, it's just 12 keys, and it's $230. It honestly feels like a prank and not a real product."

Others feel this is something that serious coders won't touch with a ten-foot pole. And I can't count the number of 'it looks like they asked ChatGPT to design a great product and ran with it' comments which are on Reddit.

Thus far, then, the reaction has been roundly negative from the target market. There are hardly any posts saying, 'I'm going to buy this', and there is a lot of disbelief being expressed at the price tag attached (even among the thin ranks of the interested parties).

The broader idea might be for OpenAI to test the hardware waters with a kind of initial practice launch here, ahead of the bigger consumer product that's coming, whether it's a smart speaker or wearable (maybe both). Although if so, quite why the price of the Codex Micro is pitched so high is a bit of a headscratcher – or maybe that's a test of sorts, and a sign of things to come, as well?

Medion Signium 27 S1: One-minute review

I'm a big fan of all-in-one (AIO) PCs, so I was pretty eager to get my hands on the Medion Signium 27 S1. I've long been a big proponent of the idea that we need more budget options in the PC hardware market, and with the current pricing crisis surrounding PC components like RAM and GPUs, reasonably priced systems are more important than ever.

Unfortunately, my excitement to review the Signium 27 S1 may have been somewhat misplaced. This certainly isn't a bad AIO desktop, offering decent (if unspectacular) performance in a clean, compact design. But there are a few too many small flaws here that make it difficult for me to recommend it wholeheartedly; if you're looking for one of the best all-in-one computers, this probably isn't it, though I do still think it can fill a certain niche in the market.

(Image credit: Future)

For the uninitiated, Medion is a German electronics company that cut its teeth producing budget PCs and notebooks in the 2010s and was recently purchased by Lenovo (whose leadership appears content to let Medion keep doing what it was already doing). I've tested some of Medion's gaming laptops in the past, and while they rarely wow, they're typically pretty good in terms of value for money.

And to be fair, the Signium 27 S1 is indeed good value for money. Its design language (particularly of the bundled keyboard and mouse) is clearly meant to evoke the Apple iMac 24-inch M4, and if you're only looking to do basic everyday tasks on your PC, it can offer a similar experience to Apple's excellent AIO for a far lower price. But if you crave the high-end build quality of Apple hardware or want a PC that can handle more demanding workloads, this won't be the right one for you.

Medion Signium 27 S1: Price & availability

(Image credit: Future)

• How much does it cost? Starting at $875 / £649 (around AU$1,250)
• When is it available? Available now
• Where can you get it? Available in the US, UK, and Australia

With a starting price of $875 / £649 (around AU$1,250), the Medion Signium 27 S1 is aggressively positioned in the all-in-one PC market, undercutting similar offerings from the likes of Lenovo and MSI.

There are a few different configurations available, which seem to vary greatly from region to region. My review unit uses an Intel Core 7 240H, while the cheapest configuration available uses the Core 5 210H. 1TB of storage comes as standard, which is very nice for the price, with 16GB of RAM in the lowest configuration and 32GB in my review model.

The closest comparison is the HP OmniStudio X, which costs $830 for the 27-inch 1080p configuration with an Intel Core Ultra 5 CPU. The HP AIO offers superior build quality and very marginally better performance, which makes it a more attractive option for US shoppers – but Medion wins in Europe and Australia, since that super-budget configuration of the OmniStudio X is only available in the US.

The only real problem with the Signium 27 S1 from a purchasing standpoint is availability. It's available exclusively through Aldi (yes, that Aldi) in the US and Australia, which means the prices above are pretty much just guidelines since Aldi retains the power to adjust the price on a per-store basis – though of course, you may well find one for cheaper. Fortunately for UK consumers, you can get it through Amazon or directly from Medion's website.

• Value: 4 / 5

Medion Signium 27 S1: Specs

(Image credit: Future)Medion Signium 27 S1 specs

Base configuration

Review configuration

Price:

$875 / £649 (around AU$1,250)

$1,150 / £849 (around AU$1,635)

CPU:

Intel Core 5 210H

Intel Core 7 240H

Graphics:

Integrated Intel Arc Graphics

Integrated Intel Arc Graphics

RAM:

16 GB DDR5

32GB DDR5

Storage:

1TB SSD M.2

1 TB SSD M.2

Display:

27" FHD (1920 x 1080), IPS, non-touch, 400 nits, 60Hz

27" FHD (1920 x 1080), IPS, non-touch, 400 nits, 60Hz

Ports:

Ethernet (RJ45), 2x USB-C, 4x USB-A, HDMI-in, HDMI-out, Combi audio jack

Ethernet (RJ45), 2x USB-C, 4x USB-A, HDMI-in, HDMI-out, Combi audio jack

Wireless:

Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3

Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3

Camera:

1080p webcam with privacy shutter

1080p webcam with privacy shutter

Weight:

3.8kg / 8.38lbs

3.8kg / 8.38lbs

Dimensions (H x W x D):

615 × 180 × 480mm

615 × 180 × 480mm

Medion Signium 27 S1: design

(Image credit: Future)

• Sleek design with easy assembly
• Limited range of screen movement
• Solid port selection

Gone are the days when AIO PCs were chunky, ugly devices. Now even a budget all-in-one can look good – and the Medion Signium 27 S1 certainly does look good.

Things do begin to fall apart a little once you actually touch it, though. The three buttons on the underside of the display are unsatisfyingly spongey, and although the base is solid metal and feels fairly durable, the rest of the device (including the keyboard and mouse) is made of cheap-feeling plastic. The mount is also very limited, only allowing for a small range of tilt with no height or rotation adjustment.

Still, there are several redeeming features here. The whole thing is very easy to assemble and start using, and the port selection is good for a PC in this price range, with a USB-C and USB-A on the side of the unit for easy access plus another USB-C, three more USB-As, Ethernet, and HDMI inputs and outputs – meaning you can either connect a second display for productivity, or use the whole device as a dumb monitor for a different system.

The webcam is merely passable, providing 1080p recording with pretty washed-out colors. It'll work for Zoom meetings, but don't expect to look good. On the bright side, there's both a physical camera shutter and a kill switch (which is a little redundant) for privacy purposes.

(Image credit: Future)

The display is decent enough, more than capable of handling everyday office tasks, and built with nice slim bezels. With a resolution of 1080p, a 60Hz refresh rate, and decidedly average color reproduction, it's not great for gaming or watching movies. The maximum brightness is fine, but again, it could definitely be better. Unsurprisingly, this monitor doesn't support HDR.

The IPS panel used here has a good-quality anti-glare coating, which helps offset the lackluster brightness; I had no problems using it in a brightly-lit room in the middle of the day. Strangely, the display can actually be raised to a 73.5Hz refresh rate, but doing so immediately knocks the resolution down to a blurry 720p, so 60Hz is the effective maximum (as listed on the spec page for the Signium 27 S1).

Surprisingly, the Signium is upgradable, with the option to remove the back panel and swap out the RAM and SSD for higher-spec components should you so desire. My review unit wouldn't really benefit from this kind of bump in performance terms, but being able to add more storage is definitely a plus.

FutureFutureFutureFuture

Lastly, the Signium 27 S1 comes bundled with a keyboard and mouse, both of which are clearly meant to evoke the aesthetic of Apple's Magic peripherals. They're absolutely nowhere close to Apple's hardware in terms of quality, immediately feeling cheap and tacky under the fingers.

They work, but they're undeniably very far from any of the best keyboards and best mice, especially the keyboard, so you'll most likely want to consider upgrading unless you have a high tolerance for poor-quality technology.

• Design: 3.5 / 5

Medion Signium 27 S1: Performance

(Image credit: Future)

• Good performance for basic workloads
• Ill-suited for gaming and creative tasks
• Sound quality is poor

Here's how the Medion Signium 27 S1 performed in our suite of benchmark tests:

GeekBench 6 (single-core) 2,409; (multi-core): 10,227

3DMark Fire Strike: 4,337; Time Spy: 1,617; Night Raid: 16,686

CrossMark Overall: 1,540; Productivity: 1,473; Responsiveness: 1,287; Creativity: 1,719

Sid Meier's Civilization VI: Gathering Storm (1080p, High): 16 fps

Without beating around the bush, the performance on offer here is merely alright. If you want a svelte all-in-one desktop for basic office tasks like web browsing, word processing, and video calls, then it can get the job done very competently. It comes with Windows 11 as standard and the usual free trial of Microsoft 365.

I found that for my straightforward work, the Signium 27 S1 was very responsive and effective, giving me no noticeable slowdown or issues with productivity. Once I swapped out the mouse and keyboard for something more amenable to my tastes, I actually quite liked working on it.

But for more demanding tasks, like gaming or creative workloads, the Intel Core 7 240H falls short. You can squeeze a bit of casual gaming out of it by tweaking down the graphical settings and using resolution upscaling tools like AMD FSR or Intel XeSS, but don't expect to be playing Cyberpunk 2077 on this PC.

(Image credit: Future)

Creative tasks offer similarly lackluster performance. While the Signium is arguably capable of low- to mid-level 3D rendering, digital art, and video processing, it's really not ideal for that sort of work. While not part of our standard benchmarking suite for AIO PCs, I fired up Canva and Photoshop during my testing period and found that it really started to struggle once numerous layers were involved.

Finally, you'll want to get your hands on a decent headset or a set of the best computer speakers if you have any intention of playing audio via this PC. The integrated speakers are weak and tinny with poor noise cancelling, more or less hopeless for anything beyond very basic video playback.

• Performance: 3 / 5

(Image credit: Future)Should you buy the Medion Signium 27 S1?Medion Signium 27 S1 scorecard

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

The pricing here is competitive, but availability issues and configuration confusion might turn off some potential buyers.

4 / 5

Design

It looks excellent and offers solid functionality, but the build quality is lackluster.

3.5 / 5

Performance

Performance in basic tasks is good, but don't expect to run any demanding software or get good audio performance from the built-in speakers.

3 / 5

Total score

The Medion Signium 27 S1 offers an undeniably solid value proposition, but fails to impress in a few key areas.

3.5 / 5

Buy the Medion Signium 27 S1 if...

You're on a tight budget
In terms of value for money, this AIO delivers the goods. Few desktop systems can offer this sort of spec sheet at this price point.

You want an attractive all-in-one computer
Despite my issues with the build quality, the Medion Signium 27 S1 looks excellent considering the price point.

You want an extra monitor and an extra PC
Using the Signium 27 S1 as a second monitor is a seamless process, which is a neat bit of additional functionality.

Don't buy it if...

You need strong performance
Even with the upgrade options, there's no real chance that you'll be able to use the Signium 27 S1 for creative workloads or triple-A gaming.

You want good build quality
Although it looks nice at first glance, this isn't a system that was built to a premium standard. The bundled keyboard in particular feels extremely cheap.

Also consider

If my Medion Signium 27 S1 review has you considering other options, here are two other AIO PCs to consider...

Apple iMac 24-inch M4
The Apple iMac 24-inch M4 is the pinnacle of this type of computer and still sets the bar, especially in the looks department. It’s also fairly powerful thanks to Apple’s M4 chip, even though it hasn’t gotten a meaningful update outside of that Apple silicon and upgraded RAM in quite a while.

Read the full Apple iMac 24-inch M4 review

HP OmniStudio X
The lower-spec version of the HP OmniStudio X 27 in the US is probably the closest product to the Signium 27 S1, making it a very strong alternative – plus, it offers higher-spec configurations with discrete graphics, if you're willing to drop a bit more cash.

Read the full HP OmniStudio X review

How I tested the Medion Signium 27 S1

• Tested for one work week
• Used it for productivity and gaming
• Ran it through our standard benchmarking suite, plus some extra tests

I used the Medion Signium 27 S1 as my regular work system for one week, swapping it out for my everyday desktop at home and using it for the usual range of work I do for TechRadar: online research, video calls, and writing reviews like this one.

I also ran our usual selection of benchmark tests (which you can see in the Performance section of this review) as well as firing up some extra programs to do further testing, including Canva, Photoshop, and Cyberpunk 2077 (which ran very poorly, no surprise there).

I've been reviewing PC hardware for more than eight years, testing all kinds of products from desktop computers to individual peripherals. I put every bit of my industry experience into my review process, so you can trust that it's both accurate and impartial.

• First reviewed July 2026

Medion Signium 27 S1: One-minute review

I'm a big fan of all-in-one (AIO) PCs, so I was pretty eager to get my hands on the Medion Signium 27 S1. I've long been a big proponent of the idea that we need more budget options in the PC hardware market, and with the current pricing crisis surrounding PC components like RAM and GPUs, reasonably priced systems are more important than ever.

Unfortunately, my excitement to review the Signium 27 S1 may have been somewhat misplaced. This certainly isn't a bad AIO desktop, offering decent (if unspectacular) performance in a clean, compact design. But there are a few too many small flaws here that make it difficult for me to recommend it wholeheartedly; if you're looking for one of the best all-in-one computers, this probably isn't it, though I do still think it can fill a certain niche in the market.

(Image credit: Future)

For the uninitiated, Medion is a German electronics company that cut its teeth producing budget PCs and notebooks in the 2010s and was recently purchased by Lenovo (whose leadership appears content to let Medion keep doing what it was already doing). I've tested some of Medion's gaming laptops in the past, and while they rarely wow, they're typically pretty good in terms of value for money.

And to be fair, the Signium 27 S1 is indeed good value for money. Its design language (particularly of the bundled keyboard and mouse) is clearly meant to evoke the Apple iMac 24-inch M4, and if you're only looking to do basic everyday tasks on your PC, it can offer a similar experience to Apple's excellent AIO for a far lower price. But if you crave the high-end build quality of Apple hardware or want a PC that can handle more demanding workloads, this won't be the right one for you.

Medion Signium 27 S1: Price & availability

(Image credit: Future)

• How much does it cost? Starting at $875 / £649 (around AU$1,250)
• When is it available? Available now
• Where can you get it? Available in the US, UK, and Australia

With a starting price of $875 / £649 (around AU$1,250), the Medion Signium 27 S1 is aggressively positioned in the all-in-one PC market, undercutting similar offerings from the likes of Lenovo and MSI.

There are a few different configurations available, which seem to vary greatly from region to region. My review unit uses an Intel Core 7 240H, while the cheapest configuration available uses the Core 5 210H. 1TB of storage comes as standard, which is very nice for the price, with 16GB of RAM in the lowest configuration and 32GB in my review model.

The closest comparison is the HP OmniStudio X, which costs $830 for the 27-inch 1080p configuration with an Intel Core Ultra 5 CPU. The HP AIO offers superior build quality and very marginally better performance, which makes it a more attractive option for US shoppers – but Medion wins in Europe and Australia, since that super-budget configuration of the OmniStudio X is only available in the US.

The only real problem with the Signium 27 S1 from a purchasing standpoint is availability. It's available exclusively through Aldi (yes, that Aldi) in the US and Australia, which means the prices above are pretty much just guidelines since Aldi retains the power to adjust the price on a per-store basis – though of course, you may well find one for cheaper. Fortunately for UK consumers, you can get it through Amazon or directly from Medion's website.

• Value: 4 / 5

Medion Signium 27 S1: Specs

(Image credit: Future)Medion Signium 27 S1 specs

Base configuration

Review configuration

Price:

$875 / £649 (around AU$1,250)

$1,150 / £849 (around AU$1,635)

CPU:

Intel Core 5 210H

Intel Core 7 240H

Graphics:

Integrated Intel Arc Graphics

Integrated Intel Arc Graphics

RAM:

16 GB DDR5

32GB DDR5

Storage:

1TB SSD M.2

1 TB SSD M.2

Display:

27" FHD (1920 x 1080), IPS, non-touch, 400 nits, 60Hz

27" FHD (1920 x 1080), IPS, non-touch, 400 nits, 60Hz

Ports:

Ethernet (RJ45), 2x USB-C, 4x USB-A, HDMI-in, HDMI-out, Combi audio jack

Ethernet (RJ45), 2x USB-C, 4x USB-A, HDMI-in, HDMI-out, Combi audio jack

Wireless:

Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3

Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3

Camera:

1080p webcam with privacy shutter

1080p webcam with privacy shutter

Weight:

3.8kg / 8.38lbs

3.8kg / 8.38lbs

Dimensions (H x W x D):

615 × 180 × 480mm

615 × 180 × 480mm

Medion Signium 27 S1: design

(Image credit: Future)

• Sleek design with easy assembly
• Limited range of screen movement
• Solid port selection

Gone are the days when AIO PCs were chunky, ugly devices. Now even a budget all-in-one can look good – and the Medion Signium 27 S1 certainly does look good.

Things do begin to fall apart a little once you actually touch it, though. The three buttons on the underside of the display are unsatisfyingly spongey, and although the base is solid metal and feels fairly durable, the rest of the device (including the keyboard and mouse) is made of cheap-feeling plastic. The mount is also very limited, only allowing for a small range of tilt with no height or rotation adjustment.

Still, there are several redeeming features here. The whole thing is very easy to assemble and start using, and the port selection is good for a PC in this price range, with a USB-C and USB-A on the side of the unit for easy access plus another USB-C, three more USB-As, Ethernet, and HDMI inputs and outputs – meaning you can either connect a second display for productivity, or use the whole device as a dumb monitor for a different system.

The webcam is merely passable, providing 1080p recording with pretty washed-out colors. It'll work for Zoom meetings, but don't expect to look good. On the bright side, there's both a physical camera shutter and a kill switch (which is a little redundant) for privacy purposes.

(Image credit: Future)

The display is decent enough, more than capable of handling everyday office tasks, and built with nice slim bezels. With a resolution of 1080p, a 60Hz refresh rate, and decidedly average color reproduction, it's not great for gaming or watching movies. The maximum brightness is fine, but again, it could definitely be better. Unsurprisingly, this monitor doesn't support HDR.

The IPS panel used here has a good-quality anti-glare coating, which helps offset the lackluster brightness; I had no problems using it in a brightly-lit room in the middle of the day. Strangely, the display can actually be raised to a 73.5Hz refresh rate, but doing so immediately knocks the resolution down to a blurry 720p, so 60Hz is the effective maximum (as listed on the spec page for the Signium 27 S1).

Surprisingly, the Signium is upgradable, with the option to remove the back panel and swap out the RAM and SSD for higher-spec components should you so desire. My review unit wouldn't really benefit from this kind of bump in performance terms, but being able to add more storage is definitely a plus.

FutureFutureFutureFuture

Lastly, the Signium 27 S1 comes bundled with a keyboard and mouse, both of which are clearly meant to evoke the aesthetic of Apple's Magic peripherals. They're absolutely nowhere close to Apple's hardware in terms of quality, immediately feeling cheap and tacky under the fingers.

They work, but they're undeniably very far from any of the best keyboards and best mice, especially the keyboard, so you'll most likely want to consider upgrading unless you have a high tolerance for poor-quality technology.

• Design: 3.5 / 5

Medion Signium 27 S1: Performance

(Image credit: Future)

• Good performance for basic workloads
• Ill-suited for gaming and creative tasks
• Sound quality is poor

Here's how the Medion Signium 27 S1 performed in our suite of benchmark tests:

GeekBench 6 (single-core) 2,409; (multi-core): 10,227

3DMark Fire Strike: 4,337; Time Spy: 1,617; Night Raid: 16,686

CrossMark Overall: 1,540; Productivity: 1,473; Responsiveness: 1,287; Creativity: 1,719

Sid Meier's Civilization VI: Gathering Storm (1080p, High): 16 fps

Without beating around the bush, the performance on offer here is merely alright. If you want a svelte all-in-one desktop for basic office tasks like web browsing, word processing, and video calls, then it can get the job done very competently. It comes with Windows 11 as standard and the usual free trial of Microsoft 365.

I found that for my straightforward work, the Signium 27 S1 was very responsive and effective, giving me no noticeable slowdown or issues with productivity. Once I swapped out the mouse and keyboard for something more amenable to my tastes, I actually quite liked working on it.

But for more demanding tasks, like gaming or creative workloads, the Intel Core 7 240H falls short. You can squeeze a bit of casual gaming out of it by tweaking down the graphical settings and using resolution upscaling tools like AMD FSR or Intel XeSS, but don't expect to be playing Cyberpunk 2077 on this PC.

(Image credit: Future)

Creative tasks offer similarly lackluster performance. While the Signium is arguably capable of low- to mid-level 3D rendering, digital art, and video processing, it's really not ideal for that sort of work. While not part of our standard benchmarking suite for AIO PCs, I fired up Canva and Photoshop during my testing period and found that it really started to struggle once numerous layers were involved.

Finally, you'll want to get your hands on a decent headset or a set of the best computer speakers if you have any intention of playing audio via this PC. The integrated speakers are weak and tinny with poor noise cancelling, more or less hopeless for anything beyond very basic video playback.

• Performance: 3 / 5

(Image credit: Future)Should you buy the Medion Signium 27 S1?Medion Signium 27 S1 scorecard

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

The pricing here is competitive, but availability issues and configuration confusion might turn off some potential buyers.

4 / 5

Design

It looks excellent and offers solid functionality, but the build quality is lackluster.

3.5 / 5

Performance

Performance in basic tasks is good, but don't expect to run any demanding software or get good audio performance from the built-in speakers.

3 / 5

Total score

The Medion Signium 27 S1 offers an undeniably solid value proposition, but fails to impress in a few key areas.

3.5 / 5

Buy the Medion Signium 27 S1 if...

You're on a tight budget
In terms of value for money, this AIO delivers the goods. Few desktop systems can offer this sort of spec sheet at this price point.

You want an attractive all-in-one computer
Despite my issues with the build quality, the Medion Signium 27 S1 looks excellent considering the price point.

You want an extra monitor and an extra PC
Using the Signium 27 S1 as a second monitor is a seamless process, which is a neat bit of additional functionality.

Don't buy it if...

You need strong performance
Even with the upgrade options, there's no real chance that you'll be able to use the Signium 27 S1 for creative workloads or triple-A gaming.

You want good build quality
Although it looks nice at first glance, this isn't a system that was built to a premium standard. The bundled keyboard in particular feels extremely cheap.

Also consider

If my Medion Signium 27 S1 review has you considering other options, here are two other AIO PCs to consider...

Apple iMac 24-inch M4
The Apple iMac 24-inch M4 is the pinnacle of this type of computer and still sets the bar, especially in the looks department. It’s also fairly powerful thanks to Apple’s M4 chip, even though it hasn’t gotten a meaningful update outside of that Apple silicon and upgraded RAM in quite a while.

Read the full Apple iMac 24-inch M4 review

HP OmniStudio X
The lower-spec version of the HP OmniStudio X 27 in the US is probably the closest product to the Signium 27 S1, making it a very strong alternative – plus, it offers higher-spec configurations with discrete graphics, if you're willing to drop a bit more cash.

Read the full HP OmniStudio X review

How I tested the Medion Signium 27 S1

• Tested for one work week
• Used it for productivity and gaming
• Ran it through our standard benchmarking suite, plus some extra tests

I used the Medion Signium 27 S1 as my regular work system for one week, swapping it out for my everyday desktop at home and using it for the usual range of work I do for TechRadar: online research, video calls, and writing reviews like this one.

I also ran our usual selection of benchmark tests (which you can see in the Performance section of this review) as well as firing up some extra programs to do further testing, including Canva, Photoshop, and Cyberpunk 2077 (which ran very poorly, no surprise there).

I've been reviewing PC hardware for more than eight years, testing all kinds of products from desktop computers to individual peripherals. I put every bit of my industry experience into my review process, so you can trust that it's both accurate and impartial.

• First reviewed July 2026

President Trump gave a primetime speech raising claims of voting vulnerabilities but offered no new evidence. And, at least 2 people have died in major flooding in Texas.

(Image credit: Saul Loeb)

NPR member station photographers captured images of World Cup watch parties outside stadium gates, on street corners and in public parks and squares as the World Cup became, for a brief period, a part of local life.

(Image credit: Patricia Lim)

• Two UK men sentenced to 5 years and 6 months for the 2024 cyberattack on Transport for London, linked to the Scattered Spider group
• Police seized devices showing evidence of the TfL breach; Flowers was also mid‑attack on US healthcare firms SSM Health and Sutter Health at the time of arrest
• TfL reported $39M in damages; the NCA says the sentencing effectively dismantled Scattered Spider, with Microsoft confirming the arrests degraded the group’s operations

Two young men, one aged 20 and the other 18, have been sentenced to five years and six months in prison for their involvement in the cyberattack on Transport for London (TfL) in 2024.

Thalha Jubair, from East London, and Owen Flowers, from Walsall, West Midlands were arrested in 2025 under the suspicion that they were the leading members of Scattered Spider - an infamous hacking collective known for breaching dozens of companies. Initial reports from different cybersecurity organizations claimed the group consisted mostly of teenagers whose native language was English.

During the arrest, the police seized different types of electronic equipment from the suspects, including laptops, PCs, smartphones, hard drives, removable storage, and more. On one of the computers, law enforcement found screenshots and videos showing the intrusion into TfL’s systems.

Millions in damages

To make matters even worse, Flowers was in the middle of breaking into US healthcare companies SSM Health Care Corporation and Sutter Health when he was arrested: According to the National Crime Agency (NCA), these two were already “infiltrated and damaged”.

The attack on TfL was one of the more disruptive incidents that year, and one which caused a lot of financial damage, too. According to a report TfL shared with the City of London Police (CoLP), it suffered around $39 million in loss and recovery costs.

Both Jubair and Flowers initially pleaded not guilty and changed their pleas to guilty on the day they were due to stand trial, it was said. Now, they are both sentenced to more than five years in jail. The NCA says these arrests and sentencing effectively dismantled the notorious hacking collective.

“Although other cybercriminals may continue to use the damaged Scattered Spider brand, the NCA’s action against Jubair and Flowers effectively halted the group’s criminal activity,” the NCA said in its report.

“Independent assessment supports this, with Microsoft confirming that the arrests materially degraded the group's ability to continue conducting cybercriminal operations.”

The U.S. and Iran expanded their targets in the latest round of strikes on Friday, as fighting over the control of the Strait of Hormuz reignites fears of an all-out war.

(Image credit: AFP)

EU rules will make Google share anonymized search data and give rival AI assistants broader access to Android features across Europe.

The post EU Orders Google to Open Android AI Features, Share Search Data With Rivals appeared first on TechRepublic.

I've uncovered a pretty cool way to save almost $400 off a ThinkPad by combining two separate promo codes.

Right now, you can get the Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 AMD for $1,324.39 (was $1719) at Lenovo. The laptop is already discounted down to $1,471.55. But then, enter coupon code THINKWEEKEND, which saves you $77.45, and code LENOVO10DEAL to save an extra $147.16. That's almost $400 off one of our top-rated business laptops.

I don't know how long this loophole will last though, so use them while you can. Better still, you can run this coupon combo across a range of other laptops and desktops, too.

Today's top Lenovo ThinkPad deal

Lenovo's ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 AMD combines a Ryzen 5 PRO processor, 16GB DDR5 memory, a 512GB PCIe Gen4 SSD, Wi-Fi 7, and business-focused security in a lightweight laptop built for work, study, and travel.

Use coupon codes THINKWEEKEND and LENOVO10DEAL for a big saving.View Deal

Business laptops can sometimes blur together, but Lenovo's ThinkPad range has always stood out for me, earning its reputation by focusing on reliability, security, and practical features that make everyday work easier.

Powered by AMD's Ryzen 5 PRO 230 processor, the ThinkPad T14 has more than enough performance for office work, web browsing, video meetings, spreadsheets, and multitasking.

You get 16GB of DDR5 memory and a 512GB PCIe Gen4 SSD, as well as a fingerprint reader for fast sign-ins, a 5MP RGB and IR webcam, a physical privacy shutter, and Windows 11 Pro, making it well suited to business tasks.

The 14-inch WUXGA IPS display has a 1920 x 1200 resolution with an anti-glare finish and 400 nits of brightness, making it easier to work in bright offices or while traveling on a train or plane.

A backlit keyboard, integrated Radeon 760M graphics, Wi-Fi 7, and Bluetooth 5.4 round out modern specifications that mean the laptop should continue to be perfectly fine for many years.

Although Lenovo markets the ThinkPad T14 primarily toward professionals and small businesses, it also makes plenty of sense for students and anyone wanting a durable, lightweight laptop that puts productivity ahead of flashy, but entirely unnecessary, extras.

If you need a dependable laptop that can handle almost anything you throw at it, these combined discounts make the ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 AMD an easy recommendation.

For more top-performers, see our guide to the best business laptop. And for more savings, see our round-up of the best business laptop deals around right now.

Also consider: More ThinkPad deals

Lenovo's ThinkPad T14s 2-in-1 pairs an Intel Core Ultra 5 processor with 16GB LPDDR5X memory, a 256GB SSD, 14-inch touchscreen, Yoga Pen, Wi-Fi 6E, and a versatile 360-degree hinge.

You can use coupon codes THINKWEEKEND and LENOVO10DEAL for a big saving.View Deal

Lenovo's ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 combines a Snapdragon X2 Plus processor, 16GB LPDDR5X memory, 256GB PCIe Gen4 SSD, Wi-Fi 7, and a 14-inch WUXGA display in a lightweight Copilot+ PC for productivity.

You can use coupon code LENOVO10DEAL for a big saving.View Deal

• Shop all ThinkPads at Lenovo

Over the last year, one topic has dominated conversations across the cybersecurity industry: artificial intelligence.

Every week seems to bring another announcement, another capability, or another prediction about how AI will transform security. In offensive security, the discussion has become particularly intense. We are seeing AI-assisted vulnerability discovery, AI-generated attack simulations, AI-powered analysis tools, and increasingly bold claims about autonomous security testing.

The question I am asked most often is surprisingly simple:

“Will AI replace penetration testers?”

My answer is equally simple: No.

What AI will do is change how penetration testers work.

And in many ways, it will make experienced penetration testers even more valuable.

AI is already changing security testing:

Let’s start with the obvious.

AI is genuinely impressive.

Modern AI models can process vast amounts of information, identify patterns, summarize findings, correlate data sources, and surface potential issues far faster than any individual analyst could achieve manually.

Within offensive security, AI is already helping teams:

• Identify vulnerabilities more quickly
• Analyze large datasets
• Correlate findings across environments
• Surface potential attack paths
• Generate documentation and reporting
• Reduce repetitive manual tasks

These are meaningful improvements.

Many of the activities that traditionally consumed valuable consultant time can now be accelerated significantly.

As a result, organizations are gaining greater visibility into their environments than ever before.

But visibility alone has never been the ultimate goal.

Finding vulnerabilities has never been the hard part:

One of the biggest misconceptions in cybersecurity is that finding vulnerabilities is the primary challenge.

It isn’t.

Understanding risk is.

Most organizations already have access to large amounts of security data. They run vulnerability scanners. They receive penetration testing reports. They consume threat intelligence. They deploy attack surface management tools. They monitor logs and alerts.

The problem is rarely a complete lack of information. The problem is understanding what matters.

• Which vulnerabilities are genuinely exploitable?
• Which attack paths represent realistic threats?
• Which issues require immediate remediation?
• Which findings can safely wait?

These questions are considerably harder to answer than simply identifying a vulnerability. And they are questions that require context.

Context is where human expertise matters

A vulnerability rarely exists in isolation.

The real-world risk associated with any finding depends on a range of factors, including asset criticality, business impact, compensating controls, user privileges, environmental configuration, attacker motivation, and the relationships between multiple weaknesses.

This is where experienced penetration testers provide value that AI alone cannot replicate.

When performing an assessment, we are not simply identifying vulnerabilities. We are thinking like attackers.

We are asking questions such as:

• How would I gain initial access?
• What would I target next?
• How could I chain these weaknesses together?
• What data could be accessed?
• How difficult would exploitation actually be?
• What is the likely business impact?

These decisions are rarely straightforward. They require judgement, creativity, and experience.

Two organizations may have the same vulnerability present within their environments, yet the associated risk could be dramatically different depending on the surrounding context.

Understanding that difference is where human expertise becomes critical.

The future isn’t autonomous testing:

There is currently a great deal of excitement around autonomous security testing. The idea is appealing. Feed an environment into an AI model and receive a complete understanding of risk in return.

The reality is significantly more complex.

Attackers do not operate according to predefined workflows.

• They adapt.
• They improvise.
• They exploit unexpected opportunities.
• They combine seemingly insignificant weaknesses into meaningful attack chains.

Successful offensive security assessments require the same flexibility.

While AI can assist with analysis and discovery, security testing remains fundamentally an exercise in understanding human behavior, business context, and attacker decision-making. These are areas where human expertise continues to outperform automation.

For the foreseeable future, I believe the most effective approach will be human-led, AI-assisted testing. Not human versus AI. Human plus AI.

AI should make penetration testers better:

The conversation should not be about replacing penetration testers. It should be about enabling them. When repetitive activities are automated, consultants can spend more time focusing on the areas where they create the greatest value.

Instead of manually processing information, they can spend more time:

• Investigating attack paths
• Validating exploitability
• Understanding business impact
• Identifying complex attack chains
• Advising clients on remediation priorities
• Delivering meaningful security outcomes

In many respects, AI allows skilled security professionals to operate at a higher level. It augments expertise rather than replacing it. The result is not fewer penetration testers.

It is more effective penetration testers.

The real challenge is prioritization:

As AI continues to improve vulnerability discovery and analysis, organizations will inevitably uncover more security findings.

That sounds positive, but it introduces a new challenge. More findings do not automatically reduce risk. In fact, without effective prioritization, they can create additional noise.

The organizations that succeed over the next decade will not necessarily be the ones finding the most vulnerabilities. They will be the ones that can most effectively distinguish genuine risk from background noise, understand how attackers are likely to exploit weaknesses in practice, and make informed decisions about where to focus finite resources.

As AI continues to improve vulnerability discovery and analysis, security teams will inevitably gain access to more data, more findings, and greater visibility than ever before. While that represents a significant advancement for the industry, visibility alone does not reduce risk. The real value lies in understanding what matters, what is exploitable, and what action should be taken next.

That is why I believe the future of security testing is not autonomous. It is human-led and AI-assisted. AI tools will continue to accelerate analysis, improve visibility, and help uncover opportunities that may previously have been missed. However, understanding business context, assessing real-world risk, and making sound security decisions will remain fundamentally human responsibilities.

The cybersecurity industry has spent years trying to solve the visibility problem. AI is helping us make enormous progress. The next challenge is prioritization, and that is where experienced security professionals will continue to play their most important role.

We've featured the best antivirus software.

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit

Zophobas morio, are often used as animal feed. But researchers have discovered they also like to feed on animal corpses and can be used to clean specimens.'/>

The larvae of a beetle native to South and Central America, the critters are the perfect solution to sticky problem: How to prepare an animal skeleton for scientific use.

(Image credit: MirekKijewski/iStockphoto)

Both Marco Rubio and Elon Musk, who led the effort to sunset the foreign aid agency, have said that no deaths have been linked to the cutting of its funding. These parents tell a different story.

(Image credit: From left: David Augustine, Lameck Nyagudi and Kazeem Olawale Nasiru for NPR)

• Market research firm Newzoo reports that Grand Theft Auto 6 has "the strongest pre-order campaign ever recorded"
• The game earned roughly $180 million in digital pre-order sales across the US and the five largest European markets during the last week of June
• It's estimated GTA 6 will achieve $3.3 - $5.2 billion in cumulative global sales by the end of launch week

Grand Theft Auto 6 reportedly achieved the strongest pre-order period ever and is on track to earn over $5 billion by the end of its launch week.

That's according to video game market research firm Newzoo, which released a new analysis reporting that the upcoming Rockstar title earned roughly $180 million in digital pre-order sales across the US and the five largest European markets during the last week of June.

These markets represent 69% of lifetime console players for GTA 5, which Newzoo used as a guide to estimate that the total global spend was around $260 million in the first week of pre-orders, concluding that this "kicks off the strongest pre-order campaign ever recorded."

"That is a massive sum with major implications for how GTA 6's total sales should be forecast," the firm said. "Placed on the sales curve GTA 6 is likely to follow, that puts it on pace for $3.3 - $5.2 billion in cumulative global sales by the end of launch week."

The report states that popular titles, such as Cyberpunk 2077 and GTA 6, follow three sales curves: the "brand-new IP," the "sequel with performance uncertainty," and "the proven sequel - a known quantity." GTA 6 "will most closely resemble the proven sequel curve," and will see linear growth as we get closer to release, with Newzoo predicting that the first-week pre-order sales account for roughly 5.8% of the total sales by the end of the game’s launch week.

With this being said, the firm believes GTA 6 could reach $4.5 billion in sales by the end of its first week on sale, which is roughly 51 million copies sold.

GTA 6 is the most anticipated game of all time, but it Newzoo noted that, contrary to social media reports, the game "has not done a billion dollars in pre-orders 21 weeks out" from launch.

"This is absurd. Given how pre-order curves look, nothing ever has and nothing ever will in the near future," Newzoo said. "What the data actually shows is $180 million in digital pre-order spend across the US and the five largest European markets in the final week of June, translating to a global opening week of roughly $260 million, with most of the ramp still ahead."

It added, "Run that figure through the plausible band of pre-order curves, and GTA VI is on track to book between $3.25 billion and $5.2 billion in week-one launch revenue. Even at the most conservative reading, namely that GTA 6 front-loads harder than any major title in our dataset, it lands at a tremendous number by any historical standard."

GTA 6 officially launches on November 19, but physical copies don't come with a disc, but a digital download code. Despite the controversy surrounding the move, a recent report suggested that the physical edition is a top seller at multiple retailers.

If you're shopping for a new phone but aren't sold on the usual Apple, Samsung, or Google options, this deal on the Nothing Phone (3) is well worth a look.

Right now, it's down to $599 (was $799) at Amazon, which is extremely close to the record-low price we saw over Prime Day just a few weeks ago. The device briefly hit $584, but this is the next best price I've seen.

On paper, the Nothing Phone (3) packs plenty of flagship-worthy hardware, including a Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset, a versatile quad 50MP camera system, and a sharp 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate. It doesn't quite match the Galaxy S26 in outright performance, but that's arguably beside the point.

Nothing has built its reputation on offering something genuinely different, with a bold industrial aesthetic and a clean, distinctive take on Android that stands apart from the competition. Combined with this record-low price, the Phone (3) makes a compelling alternative to more conventional flagship devices like the Galaxy S26 or Google Pixel 10.

Nothing Phone (3) on sale at Amazon today

Nothing's latest flagship device has just tumbled down to $599 — a price that's just $15 away from the record-low during Amazon Prime Day. With an incredibly eye-catching (and fresh) design, powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset, and Quad 50MP camera array, the Phone (3) is a fantastic alternative choice to the big Android names — particularly at this price.View Deal

Is the Nothing Phone (3) still worth it in 2026?

(Image credit: Blue Pixl Media)

When we reviewed the Nothing Phone (3) at TechRadar, we came away impressed by its distinctive design, solid hardware, and polished software experience. Our biggest criticism was its launch price, which put it in direct competition with flagship phones from Samsung and Apple. That made it a tougher recommendation unless you were looking for something really different.

With today's discount, however, the Phone (3) is a more tempting option. While the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset doesn't quite match the raw performance of the Galaxy S26, it's still more than capable for everyday use and remains a strong performer by 2026 standards.

In terms of specs, the Nothing Phone (3) holds up well, with a vibrant 6.67-inch 120Hz AMOLED display, long battery life backed by fast charging, and a versatile quad-camera setup built around four 50MP sensors.

In our testing, the hardware consistently produced impressive images, although we'd still give the edge to Apple and Google when it comes to cutting-edge image processing. Still, for most people, the Phone (3) is still an excellent camera phone.

Of course, specs have never been the main reason to buy a Nothing phone. The real appeal is its distinctive love-it-or-hate-it design. It's very different from the usual iPhone or Galaxy look, and the brand has also carried the industrial design through to its software with its own re-skinned version of Android.

In May, WordPress shipped the most consequential release in its history. Version 7.0 brought AI into the core of the CMS platform for the first time, and the people who built it made a choice that's easy to miss in all the noise about the feature itself. They left it switched off.

The infrastructure is in the codebase, but nothing reaches an AI service until the site owner connects a provider and turns it on. Upgrade a site and walk away, and it behaves exactly as it did the day before.

The on-switch was handed to the person who owns the site, not flipped on their behalf.

It's worth sitting with how deliberate that was. The team had just shipped the most powerful capability the platform has ever carried, and the posture they chose for it was opt-in, plugin-based, with nothing injected into anyone's site automatically.

In an industry that loves a sensible default, that restraint was itself a statement: this decision is yours to make.

Then the more interesting thing happened.

A reasonable instinct, taken one step too far

Within days of the release, SiteGround, one of the most established managed WordPress hosting companies in the business, did close to the opposite. It pre-installed and activated its own AI product across its customer base, configured it as the default connector, and bundled in a generous allowance of free usage to get people going.

The active-install count crossed a million almost immediately. Plenty of site owners logged in to find capable new software already running on sites they had never touched to put it there.

I want to be fair to SiteGround here, because fairness is where the useful lesson lives. This is a serious operator with a long, well-earned reputation, and the product it built is genuinely good, a real piece of engineering rather than a thin upsell. The reasoning behind the rollout isn't hard to reconstruct either.

The "correct" path to native AI is fiddly, and most people would stall somewhere in the middle and never finish it. Pre-installing the whole thing, free usage attached, removes that friction in a single stroke. From an operator's chair, that's a tempting piece of customer service, and I've sat in that chair for the better part of two decades. I understand the pull of it completely.

So this isn't a story about a company behaving badly. It's a story about a reasonable instinct (reduce friction, help the customer get to the good part faster) carried one step past the line. And the reaction told us exactly where that line is.

The objection wasn't AI. It was consent.

The pushback

The pushback was quick and pointed, and the striking thing about it was its subject. Almost none of it was about whether AI belongs in WordPress, or whether the tool was any good. Many of the people objecting use AI every day. What they objected to was finding it already switched on.

That distinction matters more than it first appears, because it separates two things the industry tends to blur: the quality of a change, and the consent to it. A genuinely good feature, installed without asking, still lands as something done to you rather than for you.

The standard defense (it's optional, you can remove it whenever you like) is all true, and none of it is the same as agreement. "We switched it on and you can switch it off" quietly moves the work of noticing, understanding, and undoing onto the customer, for a change they never approved. "Here's one-click setup if you'd like it" delivers the identical convenience and leaves the decision where it belongs.

This isn't a new tension. Webhosting companies have always made changes customers never see, and most of the time they're glad we do. But AI is going to surface this question over and over, because it's the most consequential thing most of us will ever be tempted to switch on by default. Getting the principle right now, while the stakes are still mostly reputational, is a lot cheaper than getting it wrong later.

The line worth holding

The honest objection to all of this is that hosts intervene on customer sites all the time, and nobody asks permission for that. True, and the distinction is the whole point.

When a host patches a vulnerability, blocks a malicious request, or disables a plugin that's being actively exploited, it's protecting the customer's site and the wider platform from harm. Customers extend us that trust precisely because it's defensive, narrow, and in their interest. Installing a new product is a different category of act.

It isn't protecting anything; it's changing what the website is. The trouble starts when the second borrows the permission we were granted for the first, when goodwill extended for security work quietly gets spent on shipping features. That's the line. Maintain the platform freely; change the product only with a yes.

Holding it doesn't mean making customers do more work. New capabilities can arrive off by default and one click away for anyone who wants them. Multi-site managers can get a single place to see and control what's running, rather than a hunt site by site.

Anything a host pushes can be pulled back as easily as it went out. And changes can be announced in plain language before they happen, including how to say no, because the absence of a clear, opt-out-inclusive heads-up is usually what turns an ordinary product decision into a breach of trust.

Parts of the ecosystem are already moving this way. None of it is anti-AI. If anything, it's what lets hosts lean into AI confidently, because customers can trust that nothing shows up uninvited.

Whose site is it, anyway?

As AI moves from novelty to default across the web, every host will face its own version of this question. Here's a genuinely useful new capability. Do we switch it on for everyone, or do we let people choose? The convenient answer and the right answer won't always be the same one, and the gap between them is where reputations are quietly made or lost.

It helps to remember who actually lives with the answer. When a host changes something on a site, the host moves on to the next ticket. The owner is the one who stays: the one whose visitor hits a page that behaves differently than it did the day before, whose inbox fills up when something looks off, whose name is on the business the site exists to represent. We get to make the change. They have to live with it. That asymmetry, more than anything written into the terms of service, is the real reason asking first isn't a nicety. It's an acknowledgement that the consequences were never ours to carry in the first place.

The site owners who pushed back this spring weren't standing against progress. Most of them, I'd wager, will happily adopt the very tooling they objected to, the moment they get to be the ones who switch it on. They were defending something simple that's easy to lose sight of when the technology is moving this fast: it's their site. Not the site we host for them. Theirs. A host's authority runs right up to the edge of the customer's ownership and stops there, and the best operators I've worked alongside never needed reminding of it. They saw their role as stewardship rather than possession.

That trust is the real product. Not the servers, not the dashboard, not even the support, though every bit of it matters. What a customer is buying is the confidence that nothing happens to their site that they didn't choose, and that when we do step in uninvited, it's to protect what's theirs and never to quietly redraw it. Trust like that takes years to earn and an afternoon to spend. Asking first is simply how you keep from spending it.

Get the boundary right, and AI in hosting becomes exactly what it should be: useful, and genuinely welcome. Get it wrong, and even the best feature in the world arrives as something taken rather than offered. The difference was never the technology. It was only ever whether anyone thought to ask.

We tested, reviewed, and rated the best website builders.

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit

The UK's payment landscape is undergoing a rapid transformation. While regulatory initiatives, such as the mandatory authorized push payment (APP) reimbursement scheme, provide safeguards, sophisticated cyber-attacks and elaborate scams relentlessly evolve.

To reduce fraud, strong data-sharing frameworks and collaboration across the financial services industry are essential. Collaboration between big tech, telecoms, banks and the public sector can help combat fraud through a joined-up approach to data-sharing aimed at driving out scammers and identifying potentially fraudulent transactions.

Current landscape

The scale of UK fraud is stark, with losses reaching £1.28 billion in 2025, a 4% increase year-on-year. Fraud is now operating on an industrial scale, with criminals using increasingly advanced tools and techniques to target victims. Fraud increasingly funds serious and organized crime in the UK and globally, reinforcing its status as a national security threat.

Authorized Push Payment (APP) fraud is a growing area of concern – this type of fraud continues to rise, with 248,070 cases recorded in 2025 (up 7%), showing that fraudsters are consistently adapting, pivoting to exploit new vulnerabilities, even as defenses strengthen. New scams have focused on investment, purchase-related, advance fee, invoice, and mandate scams as well as romance and impersonation scams.

Total losses from APP fraud rose sharply to £576.4 million (up 19%). This reflects a clear shift in criminal behavior, from exploiting systems to manipulating people through increasingly sophisticated social engineering.

Purchase scams made up 71% of all APP cases, demonstrating the scale and diversity of modern fraud tactics. This impact extends beyond financial loss, affecting individual livelihoods, disrupting businesses, and undermining national economic confidence.

Crucially, most APP fraud now originates outside the banking system. 66% of cases begin online (accounting for 32% of losses) and 17% via telecommunications networks, highlighting the growing role of digital platforms and telecoms in enabling fraud. Criminals are no longer primarily hacking systems; they are manipulating people, using sophisticated social engineering to bypass even the strongest technical controls.

Key considerations for the payments industry

Tackling these challenges requires a multi-faceted approach, combining robust technology, seamless collaboration to enable effective and compliant data-sharing, effective regulation, and public awareness. Key considerations are:

What does government strategy mean in practice?

Initiatives, such as the Government Fraud Strategy, provide an important framework for government, law enforcement, and the private sector. Infrastructure and data-sharing initiatives need to be effective, compliant, and aligned with national priorities to disrupt and prevent fraud. This ensures the fight against fraud remains a national priority that continuously adapts.

New data-sharing initiatives with Faster Payment System participants can play a key role here. Pay.UK’s work with participants on Enhanced Data Exchange (EDEx) will facilitate secure, timely data-sharing to empower financial institutions to detect and prevent fraudulent payments before they happen.

While still in development, its principles will complement the FCA’s APP fraud guidance and the Home Office’s Data Strategy ambitions: to enable secure, proportionate information exchange that helps prevent fraud before funds leave the system.

How can the industry continue to build cross-sector collaboration?

Cross-sector intelligence sharing and advanced data analytics are increasingly vital. Real-time, secure data exchange illuminates patterns, identifies emerging threats, and enables proactive intervention before attacks occur. When combined with strong governance and clear accountability, this kind of collaboration shifts fraud defense from isolated warning signs to a coordinated, system‑wide response.

Confirmation of Payee significantly reduces misdirected payments and various APP fraud types such as impersonation and invoice scams. It's a vital, preventative layer of security before funds are transferred. It has implications beyond its intended purpose and has strongly influenced the development of Verification of Payee in Europe.

There is a growing call for greater enforceable responsibilities for technology platforms and telecommunications providers, not only to prevent fraud at source, but also to contribute financially and operationally to combating it.

How can the industry empower and educate end users?

Beyond technology and industry collaboration, fraud prevention has a vital human dimension. Educating and empowering end users remain central – recognizing the warning signs of a scam is still one of the strongest protections available. But education alone is not enough. Consumers also need better information at the moment a decision is made.

It’s encouraging to see that, as a payments community, we are already building richer data-sharing across the ecosystem to provide clearer, more relevant context when prompting customers to pause before making a payment. Banks are moving beyond generic warnings, providing genuinely useful guidance and strengthening the point of payment as a powerful, collective line of defense.

The APP reimbursement scheme is a significant consumer protection funded by UK banks. Data from the PSR shows that £215 million was reimbursed to victims of APP fraud in 2025 alone. Across the first 15 months of the scheme (October 2024 to December 2025), 89% of the money lost to APP scams has been successfully claimed back from a payment firm and returned to victims.

While not a direct comparison, this is a significant uptick from the 65% reimbursement rate reported by UK Finance for personal accounts in 2024. Providing a safety net of up to £85,000 for victims, this scheme offers a clear recovery mechanism and brings more consistency for customers than the previous voluntary Contingent Reimbursement Model (CRM) Code.

Further, the scheme continues to evolve in line with the shifting payment landscape. The PSR has appointed Frontier Economics to carry out an independent evaluation and review of the APP fraud policies, the results of which are due to be published in the second half of 2026.

These findings, which look at the current effectiveness of the policies, fraud performance reporting and the reimbursement requirement, will influence the future of APP fraud prevention strategies and regulatory requirements, ensuring the creation of safe and trusted payment infrastructure

The battle against payment fraud is ongoing, demanding constant vigilance and strategic adaptation. While the digital age has transformed how we transact, it has also presented fraudsters with new avenues for exploitation. Yet, as outlined, it is a battle we are actively and collectively winning.

By embracing a multi-faceted approach, combining robust technological defenses, seamless industry collaboration, effective regulatory frameworks, and comprehensive public awareness, we are building a formidable shield against these threats.

We've featured the best billing and invoicing software.

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit