Feed aggregator

CNET dug into the latest speed test data to see how the country’s largest cable internet provider fared in national speed test data.

• Meta addresses the FTC's complaints over Instagram and WhatsApp acquisitions
• It says quality and output have improved since it took over ownership
• It added that the FTC's evidence was speculative

Meta has filed a Rule 52(c) motion for judgement, claiming that the FTC has failed to prove its case relating to an antitrust lawsuit it brought on over Meta's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.

According to Meta, no distinct monopoly power evidence has been shown – being that Meta's apps are free to use, traditional pricing-based monopoly indicators don't apply.

The social media giant also noted that the FTC failed to show that it had reduced the quality or output of its services, instead arguing that user engagement has grown and app quality has improved since it took over.

Meta says the FTC has no evidence over its social media monopoly

In its early days, Instagram was a small photo-sharing app with limited features, no revenue, and poor infrastructure. The company proudly proclaims to have massively improved the app's quality, reach, and features post-acquisition - with co-founder Kevin Systrom testifying to the fact that Meta had accelerated the app's growth, allowing Instagram to "thrive."

Meta also added that WhatsApp was focused on simple messaging before it was bought out, with no plans to add social features or ads, therefore it was not deemed a competitive threat to Facebook.

As a whole, the FTC's evidence has been widely criticized by Meta, with even the FTC's lead expert admitting that much of the competitive harm claim was speculative.

"The FTC has no evidence that Meta has a 60 percent share of any market that includes TikTok or YouTube along with Snapchat," the motion added.

Meta also noted: "Virtually every feature of TikTok exists on Instagram (and Facebook), and virtually every feature of Instagram exists on TikTok."

The social media giant's conclusion is simple: "The Court should enter judgment in Meta’s favor under Rule 52(c)."

You might also like

• Google "could face breakup" after being found guilty of having illegal ad tech monopolies
• Check out our roundup of the best social media management tools
• Google's Gemini AI is going to try and help build better online ads

If you ever wondered whether people buy phones for the cameras, take a look at the Samsung S25 Edge.

The U.S. Supreme Court justices heard arguments over birthright citizenship yesterday. And, week one of Sean "Diddy" Combs' criminal trial featured testimony from witnesses and alleged victims.

(Image credit: Alex Wong)

• Retailers like Aldi, Amazon, and Carrefour have backed a complaint against Visa/Mastercard
• High fees and a lack of transparency are central to the discussion
• Fees rose 33.9% between 2018 and 2022

Major European retailers and online platforms have urged the European Commission to address high fees charged by Visa and Mastercard, according to a report by Reuters.

Complaints relate to the negative impact of fees on EU competitiveness and the lack of transparency surrounding them, with the two payment network providers dominating about two-thirds of transactions in the euro zone.

Retailers have accused the International Card Schemes (ICS) of unchecked fee increases and complex pricing structures that aren't always so clear.

Visa and Mastercard criticized over fees in Europe

A 2024 report by Brattle Group revealed a 33.9% cumulative rise across ICS fees between 2018 and 2022, despite no corresponding service improvement or justification.

Visa has defended its fees: "This includes extremely high levels of security and fraud prevention, near-perfect operational resilience and reliability, and a wide range of consumer protections and high-quality, innovative products and services that serve consumer and merchant needs."

An extract from the letter addressed to the Commission's antitrust chief Teresa Ribera, financial services commissioner Maria Luís Albuquerque and economy chief Valdis Dombrovskis, seen by Reuters, reads:

"International Card Schemes (ICS) have been able to increase their fees without competitive challenge or regulatory scrutiny. They have also rendered their system of fees and rules so complex and opaque that players are unable to understand, let alone challenge, what they are paying for and why."

Supporters include major trade associations and corporations, such as Aldi, Amazon, Carrefour, H&M, IKEA, and eBay.

They're calling for antitrust action against the two payment network providers, including the introduction of fee regulation, transparency, and further regulatory tools.

The two companies had previously agreed to reduce their multilateral interchange fees for payments in the EEA by an average of around 40%.

You might also like

• We've listed the best payment gateways
• Visa slams Amazon over credit card ban
• Take payments anywhere with the best mobile credit card processors

• An AirPods Pro 3 hint has just been spotted in some Apple code
• This follows rumors about ANC boosts and possibly heart-rate monitoring
• AirPods Pro 3 could come this year, but there’s no solid release date yet

Apple’s AirPods Pro are some of the best earphones you can buy, with fantastic sound and features packaged up into a tiny product. If you’ve been hoping for Apple to release an AirPods Pro 3 update this year, you’re in luck, as it seems the company might be working on just such a device.

Interestingly, this idea didn’t come from a well-connected analyst or a bit of lucky guesswork – it came from Apple itself. It appears that the company might have accidentally leaked the AirPods Pro 3 in its own software code, as spotted by eagle-eyed researcher Aaron Perris.

According to Perris, Apple has updated a text string with info that hints at future AirPods. The text previously read “requires Apple AirPods Pro 2nd Generation” – now, it says “requires Apple AirPods Pro 2 or later.” It’s not clear which app or software this string appears in, though.

You might think that this is a simple update to account for Apple’s AirPods 4, which launched after the AirPods Pro 2. Yet Perris claims that there was already a separate text string for AirPods 4 in the software. That suggests that the information cited may be referring to an as-yet-unreleased set of AirPods Pro, although we can’t be certain.

When might we see AirPods Pro 3?

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Right now, there’s no solid information on when the AirPods Pro 3 might be announced. Apple hasn’t given any indication of when the launch date might occur, so most information you’ll see at the moment is speculation.

However, the fact that Apple has apparently made the update spotted by Perris could suggest that AirPods Pro 3 will land sooner rather than later – after all, the change might be part of preparations the company is making to release the headphones. While that’s just conjecture at this point, a 2025 release date would make sense, given that it will be three years after the AirPods Pro 2 update.

So far, AirPods Pro 3 have been rumored to come with a new design, an updated chip, and “much better” noise cancelation. We’d also love to see the ability to connect to multiple cross-platform devices (including Android phones), as current AirPods are limited to Apple products.

With Apple’s WWDC 2025 conference less than one month away, the event could be an ideal time for Apple to reveal AirPods Pro 3 to the world. Keep your eyes peeled.

You might also like

• AirPods Pro 3: all the latest rumors and leaks, plus what we want to see
• AirPods Pro 3 with 'much better' noise cancellation are coming 'soon' says leaker – but I'm still skeptical
• AirPods Pro 2 review: fantastic wireless earbuds for Apple users

Alexander Skarsgård stars in this adaptation of the award-winning book series.

Smart displays dazzle with video, interactive controls, music and smart home management. Our experts have narrowed down our favorites.

Flamingos look silly when they eat, but new research suggests they're actually being smart.

(Image credit: Serhat Cetinkaya)

Over the last week, I’ve been tasked with testing the new Sony WH-1000XM6 headphones to their absolute limit. And yes, they’re pretty great. With class-leading noise cancelling capabilities, awesome audio and features for days, these compete against even some of the best headphones around. But should you buy them now?

For many, the answer will be a resounding yes – but, you wouldn’t be alone in having a few reservations or questions. So, if you’re on the fence, here are my top three reasons to pick up the Sony WH-1000XM6 right now… as well as three reasons to hold fire.

If you’d like to check out my full thoughts, head over to my Sony WH-1000XM6 review – but for the quicker takeaway, let’s dive straight into things…

(Image credit: Future) Why you should buy them 1. You get class-leading active noise cancelling capabilities

Now, when it comes to noise cancelling, these are by far the best Sony headphones you can buy. But I’d go a step further. They’re also arguably the best noise cancelling headphones available – period.

The Japanese tech giant’s new cans use the fresh QN3 HD noise cancelling processor, which is seven times faster than the old QN1. It harnesses the capabilities of twelve mics in order to offer truly sound crushing ANC. Whether you’re looking for near-silence on your daily commute, an isolated listening session at the local café, or cans to help you lock in at the office, the WH-1000XM6 have you covered.

Even when compared to the noise-nixing legends that are the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones, the XM6 are more than capable of holding their own.

I found them to be equally as good, if not better, than the Bose in my real-world testing, which included vacuuming my apartment, walking in traffic-heavy areas, and taking public transport. On occasion, you will hear sounds creep through, but fear not – the most harsh noises will be drastically dampened, meaning you can stay focused on your favorite tunes, at all times.

(Image credit: Future) 2. They sound fantastic and can mold to your specific taste

In terms of sound quality, the Sony WH-1000XM6 perform very nicely indeed. There’s a fantastically balanced sound signature out of the box, which aims to get closer to the ‘flat’ presentation that many audio engineers seek out. No need to worry about over-zealous bass or harsh treble here.

But still, you’re able to get an exciting listen out of Sony’s new flagship cans. In my hours upon hours of testing, I was treated to clear highs, rich mids and driving low-end output, which kept me coming back time after time. And with Sony’s ‘noise shaper’ technology, these cans can pre-empt sudden sound changes for a distortion-free, controlled listen.

There’s also DSEE Extreme for upscaling lower quality audio files, and Sony’s proprietary LDAC codec for getting the best out of ‘hi-res’ tracks over Bluetooth. And if you really want to make the XM6 sound your own, you can have a play with EQ settings, which include a Find Your Equalizer test that creates a tailor-made sound, just for you.

(Image credit: Future) 3. You get access to a treasure trove of smart features

But wait… the smart features in the app don't stop there. Sony has added even more features to its Sound Connect app for WH-1000XM6 owners. There’s Auracast, a type of Bluetooth technology that enables you to tune into an audio broadcast transmitted from a phone, TV or similar device without pairing. But there’s also an instant mute function on the mic that's useful for calls, and Scene-based Listening, which can adjust ANC levels based on your environment.

And on top of these new additions, you’re getting the very best of everything that’s come before in the WH-1000X line. I’m talking multi-point connectivity, wear detection, voice assistant compatibility and adaptive sound control, which adjusts audio output depending on your location and movement.

There’s also an Ambient Sound mode and Speak to Chat for when you want to be more aware of your surroundings. Alternatively, just cover your hand over the right earcup and you’ll be able to hear everything around you super-clearly until you lift your hand away.

And I could go on… there’s a Cinema listening mode that up-mixes stereo sound into a more immersive, three-dimensional format, and Background Music mode, which makes it seem as if your tunes are playing in a café or living room.

(Image credit: Future) Why they might not be right for you at the moment 1. They’re not cheap… to say the least

Okay, I might’ve made the Sony WH-1000XM6 sound like the perfect pair of headphones so far. But still, they might not be right for everyone, at least at the minute. And perhaps the most obvious reason for that is they’re pretty pricey.

In fact, they’ll cost even more than their predecessor, the Sony WH-1000XM5, did at launch. The brand spanking new XM6 have a list price of $449 / £400 / AU$699, which is $50 / £20 / AU$50 more than the last flagship model at launch.

The XM5 are now widely available for closer to $300 / £250 and rivals like the aforementioned Bose QuietComfort Ultra are also on sale for under $350 / £350 pretty regularly.

I also need to note here that they cost the same as the Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3, and those have clearly superior sound quality, though the Sony beat them on ANC power and features.

So, even though the XM6 offer better sound quality than their predecessor and ANC that stands up to Bose’s recent supremacy, it might take a discount for some to take the plunge on a purchase.

Sony WH-1000XM6 headphones next to their predecessor, the Sony WH-1000XM5 (Image credit: Future) 2. They don’t supply the best battery life around

The Sony WH-1000XM6 dish out 30 hours of playtime with ANC on. Is that bad? Not at all. But is it particularly impressive? Again, no, not really. To be frank, 30 hours is pretty average for a pricier pair of headphones like these.

For instance, it's the same amount you’ll get out of the five-star rated Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3, as well as the Sonos Ace headphones.

On the flip side, there are some competitors that totally blow that 30 hours of playtime out of the water. The fantastic Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 boast a battery life of 60 hours with ANC on and as the name suggests, a mind-boggling 100 hours with noise cancelling off. Another pair that manages 60 hours is the Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless, which are great all-rounders with a significantly lower price than the WH-1000XM6.

(Image credit: Future) 3. You might not be bowled over by their looks

So this last one is a lot more subjective, but the design of the Sony WH-1000XM6 might not be for you. See, I do like the look of these new cans overall, but I can’t help but feel that the earcups are quite chunky. So, if you’re after a more curved or low-key look, these might not be the absolute best headphones for you.

In addition, Sony has only opted to launch the XM6 in three colorways: Black; Midnight Blue; and Platinum Silver. There’s no Smoky Pink variant at the point of release, which was a popular addition to the XM5 lineup after entering the fray in September 2024. Fans of a more vibrant look may also be better served by the Bose QuietComfort Headphones (hold the Ultra – these are the cheaper model), which you can grab in green, blue and lilac.

If I was picking some headphones on looks alone, I’d have to go with the Marshall Monitor III ANC. They have a faux leather casing on the earcups, discreet buttons and a luxury-looking carry case. When it comes to style alone, they’re among the best.

(Image credit: Future) You might also like

• I reviewed the Sony WH-1000XM6 headphones, and they’re a glorious fusion of the best parts of their predecessors
• Sony WH-1000XM6 headphones are official – here are the 3 things you need to know, and yes, the design is more portable

• Google has updates for Global Accessibility Awareness Day
• The new features cover Android and Google Chrome
• You can now ask Gemini questions about images on screen

We've already seen a bunch of updates for Apple products in honor of Global Accessibility Awareness Day this week, and now it's Google's turn – with four important upgrades on the way to Android and Chrome.

As per the official blog post, the TalkBack screen reader feature in Android is getting some extra smarts, on top of the existing Gemini-powered functionality. The feature provides image descriptions for blind and low-vision users, even when no alt text is provided.

Now, you'll be able to ask Gemini follow-up questions about the image that's showing on screen – so if you need to know what color something is, or what else is showing in the picture, Gemini will be able to help out.

There's also an update to Expressive Captions, which provides on-screen subtitles for anything with audio on your phone. Those subtitles will now reflect drawn on words, so you'll be able to tell the difference between "no" and "noooooooooo", Google says.

Chrome and language support

Page Zoom in Android can now zoom on text only (Image credit: Google)

We've got some accessibility improvements to talk about with Google Chrome, too. First up, scanned PDFs are getting Optical Character Recognition (OCR), which means you'll be able to search for text inside them, and copy that text somewhere else.

For Chrome on Android, Page Zoom (above) is adding a feature to let you increase the size of text on pages, without affecting anything else (like images or layouts). To set up the feature, tap the three dots (top right) in a tab, then Settings > Accessibility.

Google is also improving speech recognition technologies around the world, giving developers more resources for non-standard speech patterns and non-English languages, as part of its ongoing Project Euphoria initiative.

Finally, a full suite of accessibility features are on the way to Google's Bluebook app, which can be used as a testing platform. Upgrades for dictation and the screen reader tech should make the app more accessible than ever.

You might also like

• Android 16 is coming soon, with these new features
• Gemini is coming to Google TV later this year
• Google just showed us the new look of Android 16

• Microsoft was meant to make EU-specific changes to Azure by last month
• ECCO has issued its second amber report against Microsoft
• The company must now engage in Plan B

Microsoft has failed to deliver a special, EU-specific version of Azure – a milestone it was meant to achieve by mid-April 2025.

The Washington tech giant had previously committed to building a Hoster Product for EU providers, promising features like multi tenancy support, unlimited virtualization and pay-as-you-go SQL Server licensing.

It all stems from a November 2022 antitrust complaint, when CISPE accused Microsoft of engaging in anticompetitive business practices that saw it favor its own Azure cloud over competitors.

Microsoft missed a major CISPE antitrust milestone

CISPE complained that it was more expensive to run Microsoft software on rival cloud platforms than on Azure, thus the company pledged to tweak some of its licensing terms to open up competition.

The European Cloud Competition Observatory (ECCO) published its second report on Microsoft, maintaining its amber rating – not a good look for a company that's been the subject of antitrust investigations on a global scale. "Some concerns exist but corrective actions have been proposed," ECCO explains.

"Although there have been setbacks, specifically in the delivery of a product-based resolution, both sides continue to engage in positive discussions," CISPE wrote.

CISPE Secretary General Francisco Mignorance commented: "It is disappointing that the proposed product did not deliver, but this is in not the end of the Agreement. Phase 2 opens the door to discuss alternative, commercially equivalent solutions that enable CISPE members and Europe’s cloud infrastructure providers to compete fairly, while still offering Microsoft’s productivity tools to their customers."

Microsoft must now propose alternatives – a Plan B – by July 10, 2025, or face potential new legal action. In the meantime, the UK's CMA continues to review the company's licensing tactics.

TechRadar Pro has asked the company for more details on the missed deadline, but we did not receive an immediate response.

You might also like

• Microsoft hit by new legal claim over restrictive licensing and overcharging allegations
• We've listed the best cloud storage and best cloud backup software
• Save some money with the best free office software

Looking to get connected from Pittsburgh? CNET's experts found the best internet providers in the city, including the cheapest and fastest options.

• James Gunn has dropped a big tease about Wonder Woman's DCU debut
• The DC Studios co-chief won't say when Diana Prince will return to the big screen
• But fans are convinced she'll be part of Gunn's next project, which could be a team-up movie

James Gunn has set tongues wagging among DC comic-book fans after he teased that Wonder Woman's DC Universe (DCU) debut might not as far away as many people think.

Posting on Threads yesterday (May 15), the DC Studios co-chief dropped the biggest hint yet that Diana Prince could be part of his and Peter Safran's new-look cinematic universe sooner than expected.

Asked by a fan if he could share any news on Wonder Woman's possible arrival in the DCU, Gunn replied: "Not to be shared publicly yet but yes. Encouraging."

Gunn shared a promising update on Wonder Woman's DCU debut on May 15 (Image credit: Threads)

Admittedly, it's not much to go on. However, given that Wonder Woman is the only member of DC Comics' Trinity – that trinity being, the company's three most popular heroes in Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman – not to get her own DCU project yet, it's nonetheless intriguing to hear Gunn talk up her eventual appearance in the DCU.

Fans have long questioned the decision not to announce a Wonder Woman film as part of Gunn and Safran's initial DCU movie and TV show lineup in early 2023.

At the time, Gunn's Superman movie, which arrives on July 11, was confirmed to be the first of numerous superhero flicks that'll comprise DCU Chapter One. The Brave and the Bold, a Batman film inspired by its comic-book namesake, was also unveiled alongside Chapter One's initial 11-strong slate.

Gunn did reveal a Wonder Woman-esque TV series as part of Chapter One's original lineup. However, while that show – Paradise Lost – is billed as a Game of Thrones-inspired story that'll be set on Themyscria, aka Prince's idyllic home island, the Amazonian won't be its lead character. Unsurprisingly, that irked some DC aficionados who felt that, despite Wonder Woman's enduring popularity, she was being overlooked.

Why Gunn's Wonder Woman tease has sent DC fans into a frenzy

Gal Gadot is the latest actor to play Diana Prince/Wonder Woman (Image credit: Warner Bros)

Gunn's Threads post comes hot on the heels of Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) CEO David Zaslav's own comments about the company's desire to capitalize on the popularity of four specific DC superheroes.

Speaking during WBD's Q1 2025 earnings call (as reported by Yahoo), Zaslav said: "When you look at the major characters... that James Gunn and Peter Safran are developing with their 10-year plan around DC, that is to build asset value globally [with] Wonder Woman, Batman, Superman, [and] Supergirl. So, we look at those as big asset builders and big differentiators."

Clearly, Zaslav wants WBD subsidiary DC Studios to take a more proactive approach to building the DCU around its most iconic metahumans – and, surprising no-one, that includes Wonder Woman.

Batman, Wonder Woman, and Superman teamed up twice in the now-defunct DCEU (Image credit: Netflix)

With Zaslav and Gunn publicly responding to queries about Diana Prince in recent days, fans have renewed hope that it won't be too long until the Princess of Themyscira is back on the big screen. And, if a new fan theory is to be believed, some observers believe she'll return in Gunn's next project, which – whisper it quietly – could be a team-up between Wonder Woman, Superman, and Batman.

Taking to Threads on May 10, Gunn revealed that he'd started working a new DCU movie. Curiously, though, he confirmed that it was a new project, i.e., not one of the seven that currently make up DCU Chapter One, aka 'Gods and Monsters'.

That post, coupled with his comments about Wonder Woman, have unsurprisingly caused a stir. So much so, in fact, that some fans claim he must be penning the script for a Trinity film. Indeed, a thread on the DCULeaks Reddit page is full of people theorizing that this is what Gunn is secretly working on.

Comment from r/DCULeaks

What's my take on the situation? A movie that brings DC Comics' three greatest heroes together would not only be (hopefully) absolutely brilliant, but would also help us to forget about the – how can I put this politely – less-than-ideal team-up we got with Zack Snyder's Justice League and Batman v Superman's undercooked third act.

Marvel has proved that people will flock to see their favorite superheroes unite on the silver screen, so there's no reason why the DCU wouldn't benefit from seeing Prince, The Dark Knight, and the Man of Steel join forces to take down a common foe.

That all said, it could be years before a Trinity film sees the light of day. Yes, Superman is ready to take flight in the DCU and, while Kara Zor-El isn't part of the Trinity, Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow, which lands in theaters next June, will introduce wider audiences to the fourth main pillar Zaslav mentioned earlier this week.

But, until The Brave and the Bold's development gets off the ground, and either Paradise Lost or a standalone Wonder Woman film introduce us to the DCU's Diana Prince, I can't see a world where a Trinity movie would be the right project for Gunn to tackle next.

We live in hope, but if the now-defunct DC Extended Universe (DCEU) has taught us anything, it's that cinematic franchises need to walk before they can run, and making and releasing a Trinity movie before its legendary metahumans are all established in the DCU would be the opposite of that.

You might also like

• Superman trailer #2 breakdown: 7 big details and Easter eggs you definitely missed
• Confusion reigns in James Gunn's DCU as conflicting reports emerge over supposed cancellation of Colin Farrell-starring movie
• Peacemaker season 2 finally has a teaser trailer – here are 3 things you need to know about the hit Max show's return

• Figma launches new design and dev tools
• AI powers the suite
• Focused on giving teams ability to go from idea to product faster

Last week in San Francisco, design and development platform Figma unveiled four new tools aimed at giving users the full end-to-end package.

Figma Make, Figma Sites, Figma Draw, and Figma Buzz offers teams the ability to ideate and create everything from vector images to full-blown websites. And, as you’d expect, it’s all AI-powered for faster iteration.

At Config London, I got a more in-depth peek into exactly what these tools are capable of - and how they fit into Figma’s plans to create a platform that lets users go from idea to product launch without pause.

Create and launch at speed

One of the biggest issues facing businesses today is team siloing - where one hand doesn’t know what the other is doing (or, at least, has a different way of doing the same thing).

With that in mind, Figma has released four new tools alongside its beloved Figma Design and FigJam that almost entirely remove that problem.

Yuhki Yamashita, Figma’s Chief Product Officer, explained the thinking behind the new line-up, saying, “How do we help you do everything, going from an idea to a final product? And all the things that you will see in the future, too, will be anchored in this, in this framework of helping people go through this journey faster, explore more ideas, and make that process as efficient as possible.”

Figma CPO Yuhki Yamashita on stage during Config London (Image credit: Figma // Future)

Figma Make is an overarching tool for content ideation. Here, you can start from scratch or copy and paste existing designs from Figma Design, and collaborate on these with the rest of the team (Figma calls this a “multiplayer” tool). You can then port over into other apps like Figma Sites to tailor the design to suit the product.

What’s interesting here is the concept of throwing away designs. Effectively, what Figma wants is to make it easy to rapidly ideate, that if something doesn’t work, you can throw it out and start afresh.

During the press briefing, Yamashita said: “Our thought experiment was, how can we make it so easy for you to go from the idea into your head to something that is actually you can put in front of users and validate really quickly. And if it doesn't work, that's great. You can then move on to the next idea, or you can keep iterating from there.”

Figma Sites is an AI-powered website builder for all-in-one design, prototyping, and publishing. One of the chief purposes behind this is saving time - a space where developers can work on templates, responsive design, custom interactions, and transitions and motion effects. Using grids, and with a little help from AI, designing responsive sites looks and feels easy (assuming you know what you're doing, that is).

During Config London, I was treated to a brief, playful example - taking static words and prompting the AI to come up with three different ways to add some design sparkle, for example, repelling each word as the cursor hovers over it. However, as Yamashita later noted, there are more practical uses here such as connecting an API to the back-end.

There’s also the promise of future updates, with Yamashita saying, “we wanted to make sure that we could support scaled use cases, too. For example, a marketing site with tons of content, or maybe a blog. And with these kinds of content, it's much easier if we have a CMS, so that a non-designer can come in and comfortably edit that content in a way that's familiar to them. And this is something that's coming soon.”

(Image credit: Figma)

Figma Draw is, in a sense, Figma’s AI-powered answer to Adobe Illustrator. But it goes a little deeper than that, with the company keen to help designers make content that doesn't have a generic look and feel, while letting them freely express themselves and elevate their craft.

I saw a few examples of what the Figma community has already created during the event, some in hand-drawn stylings, others photorealistic images - and it’s fair to say, they’re certainly impressive. Yamashita explained, “We add things like texture and noise to make it feel much more organic, while still being a vector.”

Figma Buzz tackles the social media marketing side - once a product is launched, Buzz is a tool for promoting it online. But more importantly, it's a way to help those on the team who can’t or don’t use Figma Design to create content that matches brand guidelines. Built for designers and marketing teams, Yamashita called this “the purpose-built tool for on-brand asset creation” for dynamic and custom assets at scale.

He and his team asked themselves “how could it feel as simple as filling out a form, so that you can actually create some dynamic content?” Figma Buzz is the answer to that. Helpfully, the tool also connects to Figma Design, serving up all the features designers use, without “complicating the experience” for non-designers.

I saw this one in action on stage and came away impressed. In a matter of seconds (ok, maybe ten or so seconds), a single post was automatically localized 80 different ways, switching language, image, and national flag for the correct territories - all without removing that on-brand element.

Figma Buzz demonstration in action, creating social media assets in real-time (Image credit: Figma // Future)

You can check out Figma’s latest tools right now by clicking here and navigating to the Products section. To watch the full Config London keynote speech with Yamashita and Figma CEO Dylan Field, it's on YouTube here.

You might also like

• We took a look at the best mockup software for small businesses
• ‘It's like magic and everything just works’: We spoke to Adobe’s AI maestro to find out what’s new with Firefly and how it levels up creativity for all
• Figma’s latest survey shows AI is not yet living up to its over-hyped promise

Criticism of "activist" judges predates the term and has come from both ends of the political spectrum. Democratic and Republican presidents alike have accused the courts of exceeding their constitutional role.

(Image credit: ‎)

Cathy Harris and Gwynne Wilcox, Democratic board members of independent agencies, argue that President Trump lacked the authority to fire them, citing federal law and Supreme Court precedent.

Federal judges are looking back to the 18th century to define what constitutes an invasion, weighing a key legal argument for the Trump administration's use of a wartime deportation authority.

(Image credit: Charly Triballeau)

The health care giant's shares are down more than 50% in the last month. That's hurting the powerful U.S. stock-market index.

(Image credit: TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images)

It can be intimidating to enter a new queer space, especially if you're starting to explore your gender and sexuality. Organizers share advice on how to find a support network with confidence.

(Image credit: Nickolai Hammar/ NPR)