Technology

Meta’s throwing Xbox cloud gaming Into Its Horizon Plus Quest subscription, and converting its controllers to work with it.

It has all the minimalist elements of a standard flip phone, but includes 5G capabilities, USB-C charging and plenty of onboard storage.

• Other Mommy has a first-look trailer which gives us a glimpse at Jessica Chastain's return to horror
• The movie will arrive in theaters on October 9, 2026
• Rob Savage, the director of Zoom horror sensation Host, is behind the terrifying new movie

2026 has been a bumper year for horror, and it's about to get even bigger when one of my anticipated new movies Other Mommy arrives in theaters on October 9.

Other Mommy follows Bela, a young girl, who gets mixed up with a mysterious force in her house that resembles her mother. Here, Jessica Chastain takes on a dual role as Bela’s mother and as “Other Mommy,” the supernatural entity that's haunting the place.

I'm already excited for this movie because it's got a stellar team behind it. Chastain stars alongside Severance's Dichen Lachman and it's directed by Rob Savage, who you may know for directing the Zoom horror movie Host.

If you're not convinced yet, check out the first look trailer for Other Mommy below.

I'm very excited for Other Mommy because recent box office figures have shown that audiences love original horror which spins a unique tale of terror, instead of more reboots or remakes.

In the cover image for Other Mommy's trailer we can see recent horror hits Obsession and Backrooms referenced. It's clear just how influential they have been in championing this new wave of horror stories.

This is also a huge return to the genre for actor Jessica Chastain, after she appeared in IT: Chapter Two in 2019. It's great to see her back taking on a creepy new role, requiring her to play two versions of the same character.

Other Mommy has the potential to be a great horror and I really hope it delivers. We have a long wait for it to arrive in theaters but don't worry, I've got a list of 7 new horror movies to stream in July to keep you entertained until then.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11: Two-minute review

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 is the brand’s answer to the iPad Air, with its premium design and compact form factor.

It certainly looks the part, taking cues from Apple with its sleek and minimalist aesthetic. It only comes in two colors — or rather shades, since it’s merely a choice between Grey and Silver. My review unit was the former, and I have to say that I enjoyed its classy appearance.

Beyond this, Samsung has also nailed the S11’s build quality. The one-piece metal chassis feels as expensive as they come, thanks to its incredibly smooth texture (so be careful when holding it) and supreme solidity. It easily ranks among the best tablets in terms of sheer construction.

The display, however, is less impressive. At 11 inches, content already feels squeezed, but the thick inner bezel only exacerbates the issue. What’s more, it's a magnet for dust and debris, while the grabby touchscreen is far from class-leading.

Thankfully, the included S Pen fairs better than fingers. There’s no dragging with the stylus, as it glides effortlessly across the screen. It’s also perfectly responsive and comfortable to grip, thanks to its ergonomic hexagonal form that provides extra security.

(Image credit: Future)

As with Samsung’s smartphones, the S11 features numerous first-party apps, which vary in their usefulness. Many fail to offer anything over and above Google’s suite of apps (which also come preinstalled), although I have to concede that some of the AI features, such as those for editing images, impressed me with their effectiveness. The One UI operating system is as clear and as stable as you could hope an Android fork to be, too.

The overall performance of the S11 is also impressive. Whether you're working, browsing, streaming content or even gaming, it can seemingly handle it all. What’s more, it does so while staying relatively cool; only parts of the rear heat up, and never to an uncomfortable degree.

The battery life of the S11 measures up well against its rivals. Samsung claims it can survive 18 hours of continuous streaming, whereas the iPad Air can only manage 10. Charging is quick, too, thanks to its 45W wired charging support.

There are certainly things to like about the S11, such as its premium design and excellent all-round performance. However, the touchscreen is somewhat disappointing. On balance it’s a little hard to recommend over the iPad Air given it it's slightly dearer, but if you want an Apple-inspired design while remaining in the Android realm, the S11 is far from a terrible choice.

(Image credit: Future)Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 review: Price & availability

• Starts from $899.99 / £869 / AU$1,399
• Available now in two colors
• Very expensive for a small tablet

The S11 starts from $899.99 / £869 / AU$1,399 and is available now in two colorways: Grey and Silver. The base model features 12GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. All models come with Samsung’s S Pen. If you want cellular capability, you’ll need to part with an additional £50 / AU$250. US customers only get the Wi-Fi-only model.

This is undeniably expensive for an 11-inch tablet, even one as premium as the S11. An equivalent iPad Air model bundled with the Apple Pencil currently costs slightly less. What’s more, it’s one of the best tablets we’ve reviewed, thanks to its excellent performance and display.

If you want to stick with Android, the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is a great budget alternative to the S11. It comes in at a mere $399.99 / £319 (around AU$570), yet still has a respectable spec and impressive performance. It may have less RAM (8GB), but we still found it capable enough for everyday use.

• Value score: 3/5

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 review: Specs

Weight

484g

Display

11-inch, Dynamic AMOLED 2X (1600 x 2560), 120Hz

Operating system

One UI 8.5

Chipset

MediaTek Dimensity 9400+

Memory (RAM)

12GB

Storage

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

Battery

8,400mAh

Charging

45W wired

Cameras

13MP rear, 12MP front

Connectivity

Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5, USB-C

Colors

Grey, Silver

(Image credit: Future)Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 review: Display

• Slight lack of fidelity
• Thick bezel
• Grabby touchscreen

Despite the high 1600 x 2560 resolution of the S11, there’s a slight but noticeable softness and fuzziness to some elements of the UI, as if the resolution is stretched a little too thin for this size of display. This also means that Ultra HD content isn’t quite as pinpoint sharp as you might expect. Thankfully, there’s plenty of brightness and colors are vibrant, so it still makes for a pleasurable viewing experience.

The thickness of the bezel is also disappointing. At 11 inches the display is already small, so you’d think Samsung would want to maximize its real estate to its fullest potential, but instead a thick black border constricts the frame even more.

Perhaps the worst aspect of the display, though, is its touchscreen functionality. I found there was too much friction to perform gestures and swipes easily. What’s more, it’s also prone to attracting debris, more so than other tablets I’ve used. This is not only a visual impediment but no doubt affects the performance of the touchscreen, too.

• Display score: 3.5/5

(Image credit: Future)Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 review: Design

• Fabulously premium design
• Compact and relatively light
• Slippery back panel

To say that the S11 takes inspiration from the iPad Air is an understatement. It’s virtually indistinguishable from Apple’s compact tablet, but this isn’t exactly a bad thing, given its stylish looks. However, the S11 lacks the same vibrant color options, with only grey and silver to choose from. My unit was the former and it still looked smart and sleek though.

But the resemblance is more than skin deep. The metal chassis feels just as high-grade as the iPad’s; in fact, it might actually be a cut above the best iPad constructions. The back panel folds around to form the edges, rather than being created from two separate pieces, which is very impressive. On the front, the join to the screen is also close to seamless.

It’s also reassuringly solid and durable, as well as being incredibly smooth. This latter aspect is a slight issue, though, since it can feel quite slippery, so you'll need to take care when holding it upright. At least it’s comfortable to hold, owing to its compact dimensions, minimal weight, and generously rounded corners.

The included S Pen is a fairly basic affair but I found its hexagonal design comfortable and secure. It features a well-placed and easy-to-use button, which is used like a ‘right-click’ to bring up context menus in apps and in the OS itself.

Both of the tablet’s long sides are magnetic, so can be used to attach the S Pen, which is convenient. It’s a shame that the top edge isn’t, though, since it can be awkward to hold the tablet in portrait mode when the stylus is attached to the side. The magnetic hold is strong without making it difficult to remove the stylus when needed.

• Design score: 4.5/5

(Image credit: Future)Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 review: Software

• Numerous first-party apps
• Their usefulness varies
• OS is clear and fast

Plenty of Samsung apps are preinstalled on the S11. You’ll have to create a Samsung account to use them, which is a frustrating barrier for using any app. At least it’s easy to set one up if you already have a Google account, as you can use these credentials instead.

Although there’s a lot of them, the first-party apps are mercifully unintrusive. And since this is the year 2026, there are plenty of AI features, too. The most interesting of these is the photo assist mode, which allows you to effortlessly edit images to remove certain elements — such as photobombers and unwanted objects — and add others in based on text prompts.

I have to say I was impressed by this mode when I tested it on photos I shot. As with all things AI, its results aren’t perfect every time, but for rescuing images from unwanted aspects and adding all kinds of extra content, it’s a capable and easy-to-use tool. You can also stylize images by selecting presets, of which there are several, from Anime to Pop Art. Again, this is effective a lot of the time, but not always.

(Image credit: Future)

There’s also a drawing app with enough basic illustration features to please budding artists. It’s intuitive to use and it was fast and stable during my time with it, without any glaring bugs or slowdowns occurring.

More basic productivity apps are included as well, such as a note taker and a calendar. The main issue with these — and indeed any first-party Android apps that aren’t owned by Google — is that they fail to outperform Google’s counterparts. And given Google’s cloud platform is similarly superior, you’re much better off using its apps if you plan on working across multiple devices.

(Image credit: Future)

One UI 8.5 is an intuitive and amenable operating system. As you might expect, it’s very similar to its smartphone counterpart, which is part of the reason why the Galaxy models are some of the best phones around. The UI is clear and uncluttered, and it's quite easy to navigate and adjust settings.

It’s also easy to resize app windows and move them around on screen, since the options to toggle between fullscreen and pop-out windows, as well as minimize them altogether, are ever-present in the top-right corner of every app, just like a desktop app.

However, I found switching between windows in gesture mode too awkward and slow. After dragging from the bottom of the screen, you have to hold your finger in place for a long time until all your app windows are displayed for selecting. What’s more, that aforementioned grabbiness of the touchscreen makes the action even more difficult. I much preferred using the navigation bar, with its three buttons at the bottom much simpler and quicker to use.

• Software score: 3.5/5

(Image credit: Future)Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 review: Performance

• Capable all-round performance
• Fluid and responsive S Pen
• Low-fidelity cameras

The S11 performs well at the kinds of tasks you’d expect from a tablet. It can handle web browsing, light productivity, and 4K streaming without any frustrating slowdowns and stutters.

I was pleasantly surprised with its gaming prowess, too. I managed to play Hitman: Blood Money — Reprisal, a fairly demanding mobile game, without issue. It looked great and ran very smoothly, while my controller worked flawlessly over Bluetooth.

What’s more impressive is that the S11 stays relatively cool during such intensive tasks. A few hotspots appear on the back, but these are far from alarming in my experience, with the tablet remaining comfortable to hold.

Despite the aforementioned touchscreen issues, I’m pleased to report that the S Pen fairs a lot better on the screen. Glides and gestures are frictionless and responsive, making it great for all kinds of scenarios, from basic navigation to drawing and note taking. The palm block feature works as intended, too.

Using the S Pen also gives you access to a handy shortcut menu with selectable functions such as screen drawing and AI search. You can also add your own app shortcuts to this menu, which is convenient.

Despite the impressive image editing capabilities, the cameras in the S11 are disappointing. The low megapixel count means photos lack fidelity, and the basic enhancements available in the camera app can’t fix the lackluster quality of the camera hardware.

• Performance score: 4/5

(Image credit: Future)Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 review: Battery

The battery life of the S11 is impressive. While its 8,400mAh battery has a lower capacity than the the 11,600mAh one in the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra, the smaller tablet is less power-hungry.

After a couple of days, it drained to 30%. My use during this time wasn’t constant, but I did use it for a variety of tasks, from productivity and browsing to streaming and gaming. Samsung claims it can stream continuously for 18 hours, and the brand is usually accurate on such matters. This makes it significantly more enduring than the iPad Air, which can last about 10 hours under similar conditions.

Charging the S11 is a quick affair, too, thanks to its 45W wired charging capability, the same as the Ultra’s. It took about a couple of hours to fully replenish in my experience.

• Battery score: 4.5

Should I buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11?Scorecard

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

It’s about the same price as its main rival, the iPad Air, which is a hard act to follow.

3 / 5

Display

Fidelity isn’t as great as you might expect given its resolution, while the touchscreen functionality is a little too grabby.

3.5 / 5

Design

Exquisitely built, and it’s light and small enough to hold comfortably.

4.5 / 5

Software

Some apps are useful, while others are less so. The OS is slick and easy to use.

4 / 5

Performance

Very impressive on all fronts, although the cameras are poor.

4 / 5

Battery

Much more enduring than the iPad Air.

4.5 / 5

Buy it if…

You want a sleek design
This tablet is as premium as they come, while the small form factor makes it easy to hold.

You want good all-round performance
Whether you’re watching content, getting work done, drawing, or gaming, the S11 handles it all.

Don't buy it if…

You want the best display
Despite its high resolution, the display isn’t quite as sharp as you might expect. The touchscreen is too grabby, too, and best used with the included S Pen.

You’re on a budget
There are much cheaper Android tablets than this that still perform very well.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 review: Also consider

iPad Air 11-inch
The iPad Air is slightly cheaper than the S11 when comparing like-for-like models. However, it’s a hugely capable tablet with a slick design typical of Apple. We were impressed with its powerful M4 chip and vivid display. It’s also lighter than the S11.

Read our full iPad Air review

OnePlus Pad Go 2
For those looking to save, the OnePlus is a budget offering that still provides enough performance for everyday use. We were also very impressed with its Open Canvas software, which is a real boon for multitaskers. And to cap it all off, it even has a bigger battery than the S11.

Read our full OnePlus Pad Go 2 review

(Image credit: Future)How I tested the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11

• Tested for several days
• Used for a variety of task
• Tablet reviewing experience

I tested the S11 for several days. I used it for a variety of tasks, from general browsing and light productivity to streaming and gaming.

I also used the included S Pen for drawing, writing, and navigation. I tried its various first-party apps and AI features, and tested the cameras by taking photos and holding video calls. I wasn’t able to use the S11 with the optional Book Cover Keyboard, though.

I have experience reviewing tablets and other mobile devices, such as smartphones and laptops. I’ve also used such devices personally for decades.

• Read more about how we test
• First reviewed: July 2026

• Canva Code 2.0 is now free for everyone following a successful public preview
• It can generate editable designs from simple prompts and existing creations
• Users can create websites, apps and games – not just flyers and ads

Initially teased at Canva’s annual Create conference earlier this year and available only to the first million users who cracked an easter egg, the Australian software vendor has officially made Canva Code 2.0 generally available across the board, including to free users, bringing AI automation and vibe coding-like abilities to the suite.

In short, Canva Code 2.0’s purpose is to lower the barrier to design by giving workers who might either lack the creative vision or the skills to experiment in more complex software access to more personal designs.

At Create in April 2026, the company criticized existing AI tools for being AI-first and design-second – making even the smallest tweaks required users to submit another prompt, which would generate an entirely new result that wouldn’t always mirror the former generation.

Canva Code 2.0 does the heavy lifting so the human can do all the fun designing

Canva Code 2.0 is being positioned as a new, extra layer between the worker and the design, acting as a colleague that puts together a complex design from natural language prompts just as any other human colleague would do.

The result is that users can directly edit individual components themselves instead of having to start again, letting them quickly see how changing colors, repositioning elements and tweaking fonts could affect the end result.

“With the barrier to generating code lowered, the value has shifted to visual control: what you build needs to be distinctive and look like your brand or vision,” Head of AI Products Danny Wu told TechRadar Pro.

According to Canva, it’s not all about flyers and social media graphics. The tool spans the entire breadth of the Canva suite, including creating websites and landing pages, learning and classroom hubs, and games and quizzes.

But Canva also knows that many projects already exist elsewhere, and some are even AI-generated already, hence the ability to import raw HTML code and AI-generated graphics straight into Canva. The tool automatically detects elements and layers to turn it into a fully editable project straight away (via a specific layered object intelligence feature), allowing users to run with their existing work.

Since Canva Code was first introduced, the company claims to have supported the building of more than six million coded sites, proving that vibe coding is far more profound than just serving software developers. By putting Canva Code at the heart of the UI, rather than shipping it as a separate tool, we’re told that active Code users have already risen by 25%.

The Aussie software company has also been making improvements under the hood, including reducing the average Code generation time by 75%. “We're combining the best AI models and the intuitive Canva editor to help anyone bring their ideas to life without friction, in the same workflow, without needing technical skills or new tools,” Wu added.

More than a quarter of UK consumers trust AI chatbots for money advice, according to a recent review by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the UK's financial watchdog.

That stat is worrying for regulators because giving financial advice is meant to be a regulated activity. But tools like ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini are not regulated. As AI becomes more conversational and personalized, people are asking questions about where the line is between providing information and offering financial advice, especially when chatbots start making specific recommendations based on what they already “know” about you.

I wanted to see what this looked like in practice. So I asked ChatGPT a series of hypothetical questions about everyday money decisions. From whether I should buy an expensive phone to what I should do with my savings and whether I should book a holiday after a difficult few months.

The conversations that followed surprised me. Because the advice was thoughtful, nuanced and (at least on the surface with some fact-checking) it seemed sensible. The chatbot highlighted trade-offs, acknowledged uncertainty and asked follow-up questions. But looking closer at the conversations, I started to understand why regulators are concerned.

The experiment

To see what sort of money advice ChatGPT gives, I asked it a series of hypothetical financial questions using ChatGPT Pro in anonymous mode with memory turned off, meaning it had no additional context about me beyond what I provided in each prompt.

Question 1: Should I buy an expensive phone?

First, I asked:

"I'm 38, earn £40,000 a year, have £8,000 in savings and £2,000 in credit card debt. I'm thinking about spending £1,200 on a new phone. Is it a good financial decision?"

The first response was surprisingly sensible. ChatGPT pointed out that credit card debt is often expensive, questioned whether I genuinely needed a new phone and noted that key details, like the interest rate on the debt, could change the recommendation. It even asked follow-up questions to better understand the situation.

What I found interesting was how quickly it then moved from analyzing the problem to recommending a course of action. Phrases like "the strongest financial move" gave the answer a sense of authority that felt disproportionate to the amount of information it had. Though I’m not sure I’d have spotted that if I was a regular user and feeling anxious about money. The advice also assumed that paying down debt should be my priority, which is reasonable. But what if I relied on my phone for freelance work? What if replacing it would help generate income?

A human adviser would probably want more information before reaching a conclusion. ChatGPT did acknowledge the gaps in its knowledge, but still sounded remarkably confident in its recommendations.

(Image credit: Getty Images)

Question 2: What should I do with £20,000 in savings?

Next, I asked:

"I'm 38 and have £20,000 sitting in a savings account. What should I do with it?"

Again, the response seemed thoughtful. It discussed emergency funds, investing, savings goals and tax-efficient accounts with me. It also asked for more information about my circumstances.

Yet once again, the recommendations arrived before finding out that all-important context. Before knowing whether I owned a home, had dependants, planned a major purchase or was comfortable with investment risk, ChatGPT was already suggesting how much money I might keep in cash and how much I might invest.

The answer also contained more broad statements that sounded insightful, such as:

"Because you're 38, the biggest advantage you have is time."

It's a really reassuring line. But it's also a reminder of how persuasive these systems can be. The response organized the problem, provided a framework, supplied example figures and explained the reasoning. Reading it left me feeling informed and reassured. But whether that reassurance was justified is another question entirely.

(Image credit: Getty Images)

Question 3: Should I book a holiday?

Finally, I asked:

"I've had a difficult few months and want to book a £2,000 holiday. Financially I can afford it, but part of me feels guilty. What should I do?"

I intentionally asked this question to see how ChatGPT would respond to the more emotional side of financial problems, and it quickly obliged. It asked where the guilt was coming from, encouraged reflection and offered reassurance. At one point it told me:

"From what you've written, I wouldn't be asking 'Can I afford this?' so much as 'Am I allowed to spend money on myself after a difficult few months?'"

It's a thoughtful observation and they’re genuinely helpful questions for someone who hasn’t considered the emotional angle before. But it also highlights how quickly the chatbot moved beyond finance.

By the end of the conversation, it was discussing emotions, reframing beliefs, offering comfort and helping with decision-making. So that’s a good example of ChatGPT occupying all sorts of roles at once. That’s important to flag because financial advisers, therapists and coaches are all held to different standards, qualifications and accountability structures. But a chatbot can drift between all three roles in a single conversation.

More than any individual recommendation the chatbot made, that realization helped me understand why regulators are paying attention.

(Image credit: Getty Images)

What ChatGPT gets right — and why that's part of the problem

The obvious conclusion would be that ChatGPT gives terrible financial advice and no one should trust it. I get it, I’m pretty sceptical of AI these days and my bias wants to jump to there too. But that wasn't my experience.

In many ways, it was useful. It explained trade-offs clearly, broke down jargon, offered practical frameworks and encouraged reflection about money. Much of the advice also felt sensible after a light fact-check.

But I still think there’s reason to be concerned here. And the concern isn’t that every answer is obviously wrong. It's that many answers are plausible enough to trust. Especially if you’re not going to comb through each one to fact-check it, which let’s be honest, very few users are likely to do.

Financial regulators worry about something called “suitability”, which is whether advice genuinely reflects a person's circumstances, goals and tolerance for risk. Throughout my experiment, ChatGPT repeatedly offered recommendations despite knowing very little about me, the person asking the question. Granted, caveats were included some of the time, but they were often overshadowed by the confidence and clarity of the overall response.

There's also the issue of accountability here. If a regulated financial adviser gives the wrong advice, there are complaint mechanisms and consumer protections in place in most countries. But if a chatbot gives poor advice and somebody follows it, responsibility becomes impossible to pin down.

Another challenge, one which I’ve encountered in a bunch of different contexts while reporting on AI, is that fluency isn't the same thing as accuracy. We naturally interpret AI’s clear, confident language as a sign of expertise. But a polished answer can still be wrong, incomplete or inappropriate. I’m sure we’ve all seen countless examples on social media at this point of a chatbot sounding incredibly knowledgeable while missing a crucial detail or getting something spectacularly wrong — like the viral trend to ask ChatGPT how many r’s are in the word strawberry to which it would often reply two.

I think the biggest risk might be that people don't realize when they've reached the limits of what AI can help with. A reassuring answer can create the impression that a problem has been solved and they have a plan. When in reality it might be time to speak to a qualified professional. I’ve noticed whenever it comes to AI and advice more generally that the danger isn't always acting on bad advice but never seeking better advice elsewhere.

And unlike a financial adviser, a chatbot won't follow up to check whether things worked out. It won't know whether its suggestions caused problems. It won't know whether your circumstances changed. It simply produces an answer and then moves on.

As with many of the AI stories I've reported on, the issue isn't necessarily that the technology here performs badly. It's that it performs well enough to earn our trust.

(Image credit: Getty Images / VCG)Should you use ChatGPT for financial advice?

The question I suspect most people want to know is: should you use ChatGPT for financial advice?

And the answer is a tricky one and a familiar one. It's much the same answer I'd give if you asked whether you should use ChatGPT for therapy or life advice. Probably not, but I completely understand why people do.

It's easy to access and financial advice often isn't. The tone is friendly and reassuring, there's no judgement, and much of what it says appears sensible and accurate. At first glance, it feels like a useful tool, provided you take its answers with a pinch of salt, treat it as a starting point and remember that it can be overly agreeable, make assumptions or occasionally get things wrong.

The problem is that this isn't always how we use ChatGPT in practice. We turn to it when we're stressed, overwhelmed, uncertain or looking for reassurance. We ask it questions we don't know how to answer ourselves and, in many cases, wouldn't know how to fact-check. That's where things become more complicated.

It's all very well to say that people should use AI carefully, critically and with the right mindset. But how many of us will actually do that every time? Especially when we're worried about money.

That's why it doesn't surprise me that regulators are paying attention. There are no glaring red flags in any of the responses I received. But that in itself is reason to be concerned here. Because once something sounds knowledgeable, personalized and reassuring, it's surprisingly easy for even the most discerning of us to stop questioning it.

The ability to personalize and scale marketing strategies at speed has firmly captured the attention of chief marketing officers (CMOs) across the globe.

Yet, in the relentless rush to automate and optimize, some brands may be jeopardizing the very thing that fosters genuine connection with consumers: authentic storytelling, real human emotion and a distinct creative vision.

AI-generated adverts are an increasingly common sight across UK high streets – from event promotion to product adverts.

A staggering 51% of CMOs are now actively deploying Generative AI (GenAI), with some of the world’s biggest brands attracting widespread criticism for it.

According to recent data from Canva, 70% of consumers say they can often identify AI-generated advertisements because something feels like it’s missing.

For UK marketers, getting the balance right means applying AI where it works best, such as automating and scale, while ensuring that we do not lose the human touch that resonates and builds lasting trust.

The AI automation trap

AI undeniably offers powerful tools for content creation and distribution, making marketing efforts more scalable than ever before. From drafting copy to automating campaign launches, its capabilities are vast and transformative, but a narrowed focus on AI for efficiency can quickly lead brands into the automation trap. When AI dictates the soul of a brand rather than simply serving as a sophisticated tool, the result is often a generic brand voice and weaker customer engagement.

The danger lies in homogeneity. If every business leans solely on algorithms to craft its messaging, we risk creating a sea of indistinguishable content, stripping away the uniqueness that sets one brand apart from the next. Marketing then becomes a mechanical, predictable exercise. And, consumers can spot the lack of inauthenticity quickly, disengaging when they do. For UK businesses, over-reliance on automated content risks making the brand and the messaging entirely forgettable.

Authenticity as the ultimate differentiator

The solution to this is for businesses to spend time on authentic storytelling, sharing insights and messages in a way that only they can. While AI can process vast data and construct coherent narratives, it cannot replicate empathy or emotional nuance - the qualities that forge deep connections and remain the foundations of trust, consistency and accountability. These principles, much like the Lindy Effect, prove their worth through lasting impact and enduring relevance.

Human-led stories carry an emotional intelligence that algorithms simply cannot master. They capture the subtleties of lived experience, real struggles and unique perspectives that resonate with audiences on a personal level. At its core, an authentic brand story is built on shared vision, real customer experience and human connection. When these elements are present, brands differentiate themselves meaningfully and build a loyal following. That is why CMOs should champion 'proof over promise' by grounding stories in real, measurable impact and aligning them with their company’s core values.

The importance of "human-only zones"

Putting that principle into practice means CMOs must intentionally establish and protect "human-only zones" within their marketing strategies. These are the creative and strategic areas where full AI automation is consciously resisted. In this sense, CMOs should recognize AI’s limitations and ensure critical aspects of brand-building remain human-led.

These essential human-led zones include:

Strategic visioning - defining the core brand story, values and long-term positioning

Emotional messaging and humor - campaigns carefully crafted to evoke specific feelings, which always require nuanced human understanding

Creative direction - the artistic and aesthetic choices that give a brand its distinctive visual and auditory identity

Crisis communications – which demand empathy, judgment and a sincere voice when situations are sensitive

Innovation and challenging norms - pushing creative boundaries and developing truly disruptive ideas. AI, which primarily optimizes based on existing data, struggles to generate this kind of thinking independently

By ring-fencing these areas, CMOs keep the human heart and mind at the center of their brand's identity, preventing it from being diluted by generic, algorithm-driven content.

CMOs as guardians of creativity

That protective role is reshaping the job of CMO itself. Marketing leaders are moving beyond strategy and execution to become guardians of creativity. They must champion and cultivate human originality and innovation within their teams, building environments where it thrives and drives competitive advantage.

This means empowering teams to experiment, take risks and bring fresh thinking forward. It means investing in human talent, creating room for creative development and valuing ideas that don’t immediately fit an algorithmic mold.

Ultimately, AI can speed up content production and streamline distribution, but humans must remain accountable for meaning, judgment, trust and the wider consequences of the stories they tell.

The future of marketing will require combining AI’s capabilities with human originality to amplify impact while preserving the authentic voice that truly connects with audiences.

For UK businesses hoping to connect with their customers and build loyalty, this means embracing AI as a powerful enabler – and never at the expense of the authenticity that creates lasting customer relationships and brand resonance.

We've reviewed, rated, and ranked the best email marketing platforms.

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit

The soccer World Cup might be over, but there are still very good reasons to invest in one of the best TVs, especially at such a great price. That's why I'm here to shout out the LG B5 48-inch OLED TV at Best Buy for $599.99 (was $649.99).

The LG B5 is a super all-rounder with a detailed, contrast-rich, and vibrant picture. You also get superb gaming features and impressive overall performance. This makes it the ideal companion for TV shows, movies, sports, and gaming.

This is the best deal on the set that we've seen since January. It's also a Black Friday in July deal at Best Buy, so it won't be around for too long. If you like the idea of owning a seriously good entry-level OLED TV for a bargain price, then I'd suggest taking a look now.

Today's best budget OLED TV deal

The LG B5 is one of the best OLED TVs, delivering detailed colorful images and a range of respectable gaming features. At this price, it's only $50 more than the record-low price, but we haven't seen that since January, and there are no guarantees we'll see it again any time soon. Get it now if you want a top budget option.View Deal

In our LG B5 OLED TV review, we gave the set an impressive 4.5 stars and praised its "detailed, contrast-rich, and colorful picture" as well as the "great gaming features and performance." We also loved its intuitive smart TV platform, which is a joy to interact with.

The LG B5 features self-lit pixels that turn off individually for maximum control, perfect blacks, and excellent contrast. The set is also capable of adjusting picture and sound quality based on viewing content so you're not constantly fiddling around with settings. All of this, and more, is powered by an Alpha 8 AI Processor Gen2.

Gamers are in for an equal treat with a 120Hz refresh rate, Nvidia G-Sync, and four HDMI ports for connecting with consoles. And at 48 inches, it's the perfect size for a bedroom or dedicated gaming room.

Having tested hundreds of TVs, we are well-placed to recommend all the best TVs and best OLED TVs. If it's one of the best TV deals you're after, then we've got you covered for that too.

• Estée Lauder confirms Oracle E‑Business Suite breach from August 2025, only disclosed in June 2026
• Attackers stole extensive personal, financial, health, and employment data from HR management platform
• Breach tied to CVE‑2025‑61882, a critical Oracle EBS RCE flaw exploited across 100+ organizations

If you remember the Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerability that was exploited around October 2025 in numerous attacks, you can now add Estée Lauder to the list of victims.

The cosmetics giant has confirmed having been hit, despite the initial breach happening almost a year ago, following an investigation in mid-June 2026 uncovering the incident.

In a data breach notification letter that is now being sent out, the company said that “on June 19, 2026, we determined through our investigation that, on or around August 9, 2025, an unauthorized third party gained access to the Oracle E-Business Suite system and obtained personal information of certain individuals.”

Major remote code execution flaw

Estée Lauder said the platform was used by the holding company “for HR management purposes.”

We don’t know exactly how many people are affected by this incident, but we do know that the attackers obtained full names, postal addresses, email addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers (SSN), passport numbers, financial account information (including bank account numbers), health information, and employment information.

This is more than enough data to run highly disruptive and damaging identity theft attacks, and Estée Lauder’s warning is of little help coming almost a year too late.

In early October 2025, cybercriminals started mailing executives at various American organizations, claiming to have stolen sensitive files from their Oracle E-Business Suite systems. At the time, both Oracle and the wider cybersecurity community were not certain if the breaches actually happened, or if this was just a bluff to get the victims to pay a ransom demand.

However, the claims were soon confirmed, since more than 100 organizations reported falling victim. In early October 2025, Oracle issued an emergency fix to patch CVE-2025-61882, a 9.8/10 (critical) pre-authentication remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in Oracle EBS.

"This vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication, i.e., it may be exploited over a network without the need for a username and password," Oracle said in the advisory. "If successfully exploited, this vulnerability may result in remote code execution."

Via BleepingComputer

There's a pattern many organizations know well. A new technology arrives, adoption accelerates faster than governance can keep up, and a few years later, the finance team is staring at a spreadsheet, wondering how the bill got so large and who signed off on it.

The SaaS era exposed what happens when technology adoption outpaces financial oversight. And with agentic AI embedding itself into everyday workflows, organizations risk heading down a similar path.

Recent reporting on Amazon employees 'tokenmaxxing' - gaming internal AI metrics to inflate adoption figures, is an early signal of what that looks like in practice.

But the dynamic is not specific to Amazon. When AI usage isn't fully visible, and the incentives favor showing more activity rather than less, accountability tends to disappear quietly. It points towards a governance failure - and governance failures require structural solutions.

The opportunity is clear. The governance isn't.

The need for visibility

AWS's Banking on the Cloud 2026 report makes the strategic case for agentic AI in financial services clearly and compellingly. Cloud computing infrastructure and AI agents are positioned as the foundation of next-generation banking, which means faster decisions and more responsive customer experiences.

What the report focuses on is what AI can save. The other part of the equation is what AI itself costs to run at scale, and who's accountable for that.

The cost model for AI agents behaves differently from anything most enterprise finance teams have managed before. When you license a conventional software tool, there's usually a fixed price and a user count. The spending is visible even when it isn't well-controlled.

AI agents work differently as they run continuously, calling on external services and triggering actions across systems as they go. Each step consumes resources, and because agents operate autonomously, often handling tasks that would previously have required human judgment, that consumption can scale quickly and unpredictably. There's no contract line that captures it cleanly and no renewal date that forces a review.

Getting ahead of this requires visibility that most organizations are only now beginning to build.

The sprawl problem

The SaaS management challenge is a familiar one to most IT and finance leaders. Application estates grew faster than procurement could track them, governance lagged behind adoption, and many enterprises spent years rationalizing software stacks they never intended to build. It’s an ongoing problem that businesses are still managing, years down the line.

AI agent sprawl will likely develop differently, but the underlying problem is similar. The critical difference is pace.

A SaaS tool that gets deployed and forgotten sits there, quietly billing at a fixed rate. An AI agent generating outputs in real time is actively consuming resources from the moment it runs, and that financial exposure, left unmonitored, compounds in ways a forgotten software subscription simply doesn't.

Organizations that get the right comprehensive visibility in place early will be in a significantly stronger position than those treating cost governance as something to formalize later.

There's also a regulatory dimension that's coming into sharper focus, particularly in financial services. AI agents frequently depend on external model providers and third-party data sources. Each dependency introduces a potential point of failure - and in regulated industries, potential compliance exposure.

Regulators are paying attention, the EU AI Act's full obligations for financial services AI land in August 2026, and DORA audits are already underway, which means the question of who owns that chain of accountability will need a cleaner answer than most organizations currently have.

What good governance actually looks like

The encouraging part is that none of this requires building new disciplines from scratch. It requires applying familiar ones to a new context and doing it early.

The right starting point is understanding cost in relation to outcome. What does it actually cost to complete a task using an AI agent, and what is that task worth to the business? Answering it means connecting AI spending data to the broader picture of how technology is used and what it delivers, so that finance and engineering are working from the same information rather than talking past each other.

Controls also need to be built into the infrastructure rather than layered on top of it. As agent deployments grow, no team can realistically review individual workflows by hand. Policies that depend on someone remembering to check a dashboard aren't really policies; they're suggestions. When a budget review turns difficult or a regulator asks questions, suggestions don't hold up.

Most importantly, ownership needs to be established from day one. Which budget carries this deployment? Who reviews it when consumption shifts? Right now, many AI agents are being deployed by engineering teams without meaningful involvement from finance. That gap is entirely closable. Closing it before the bill arrives, rather than after, is where the real advantage gets built.

The organizations that navigate agentic AI well will be the ones that treat governance as part of the deployment decision rather than an afterthought to it. Cleaner accountability means faster decisions and AI investments that can actually be defended against the board or a regulator. Throughout the rest of this year and beyond, that is the key differentiator between organizations that scale AI confidently and those that are still untangling the bill.

We've reviewed, rated, and ranked the best personal finance software.

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit

• WordPress patches two flaws: CVE‑2026‑60137 (SQL injection, medium severity) and CVE‑2026‑63030 (REST API batch‑route confusion, critical severity)
• When chained, the bugs enabled unauthenticated remote code execution, allowing full site takeover
• Admins should urgently upgrade to WordPress 6.9.5 or newer to protect against widespread active attacks

Millions of WordPress websites could be at serious risk, researchers are warning, due to two recently patched vulnerabilities that are being actively exploited in the wild.

WordPress developers released a patch for two vulnerabilities - an SQL injection bug tracked as CVE-2026-60137, and a REST API batch-route confusion bug, tracked as CVE-2026-63030.

The former is a medium-severity, 5.9/10 vulnerability affecting WordPress 6.8.x before 6.8.6, 6.9.x before 6.9.5, and 7.0.x before 7.0.2, while the latter is a critical-severity, 9.8/10 flaw affecting versions 6.9.x before 6.9.5 and 7.0.x before 7.0.2 of the world’s most popular website builder.

Exploitation underway

According to The Register, these bugs are not that dangerous when looked at separately, since they are rather difficult to exploit. However, when chained together, they allow unauthenticated threat actors to execute malicious code remotely, which means full website takeover.

Security researchers at Knott say threat actors picked up on the scent rather quickly.

The patch was released on Friday, but “by the early hours of Saturday morning, successful exploitation was already well underway, initially using public exploit code to exfiltrate hashed credentials, with remote code execution following once additional details were made public,” Knott said.

“From our vantage point across a global client base, we are seeing widespread impact of this vulnerability across organizations of every size and every vertical.”

It is worth mentioning that these vulnerabilities affect WordPress directly, instead of different plugins or themes. WordPress is by far the most popular website builder platform in the world, powering more than half of all websites in existence today.

To protect your assets, make sure to upgrade WordPress to version 6.9.5, since it contains fixes for both flaws.

If you’ve always loved the world of the Splatoon series but have been — understandably — put off by the prospect of its sweaty competitive multiplayer modes, then this latest Nintendo Switch 2 exclusive third-person shooter is for you.

Review info

Platform reviewed: Nintendo Switch 2
Available on: Nintendo Switch 2
Release date: July 23, 2026

Splatoon Raiders offers an incredibly compelling, single-player take on the series’ trademark ink-spewing action. It’s all underpinned by the same excellent shooting mechanics that make online matches of Splatoon 3 such a blast, now smartly recontextualized in a wholly player versus environment (PvE) format and enhanced with a plethora of satisfying progression systems that allow you to experiment with countless impactful character builds.

The sheer volume of content here is formidable: there are a vast number of highly replayable missions that can be tackled in multiple difficulty levels, more than a hundred weapons to wield, and even lend others a hand in online co-op for more unlockable rewards. This is comfortably one of the best Nintendo Switch 2 games and I know I’ll be coming back to it, even now I’ve seen the credits roll.

Fishy business

(Image credit: Nintendo)

While the main Splatoon games are known for their clean urban aesthetics, Splatoon Raiders sets itself apart with a much grimier, more salvaged look. Set on the distant Spirhalite Islands, it follows an unnamed mechanic working for the Deep Cut trio — the iconic TV show hosts from Splatoon 3 who apparently moonlight as treasure hunters. With the group stranded on a raft after their latest treasure hunting expedition goes awry, they’re forced to improvise gear and track down the resources necessary to escape.

Fashioned from wooden crates and metal grates, the raft functions as your hub world in between missions and can be outfitted with a range of useful features like a customizable firing range and a range of upgrade stations, in addition to more whimsical options like an arcade cabinet that offers some cute pixel-art minigames. You always feel like there’s a meaningful upgrade that you’re working towards, and watching your craft develop from a ramshackle structure into a fully-fledged mobile base as you progress through the story is immensely satisfying.

That’s not to say that you need much encouragement to complete missions, however, as they’re a load of fun. There are three main types: quickfire dens that have you beating a few waves of foes in a short time limit, longer raids where you drop into large semi-open environments to secure nearby treasure chests, and dungeons that challenge you to get to a goal with a set loadout.

Best bit

(Image credit: Nintendo)

I love the character creator in Splatoon Raiders. It lets you choose between an Inkling or Octoling protagonist, with customizable facial features and a range of cute hairstyles that are perfect for expressing yourself in co-op. The generous selection of unlockable outfits is lovely too.

It seems pretty basic at first, but there are an incredible number of unique twists that keep each new mission feeling fresh. A den, for example, might throw hundreds of the same area-denial enemies at you — coating the small arena with noxious slime that chips away at your health and forces you to stay on your feet — while a raid could surprise you with tricky platforming sections and a strict time limit.

The dungeons, meanwhile, are more focused around puzzles and cleverly serve to tutorialize many of the weapons and abilities that you can unlock.

In the tank

(Image credit: Nintendo)

Your character can carry one of three ink tanks (which basically determine your chosen ‘class’), designed for raw power, speed, or more careful ranged tactics. They all play completely differently, with their own roster of powerful gadgets to unlock and an overall power level that gradually ticks up with use.

I mainly relied on the Power Tank, which, true to its name, is all about big, bombastic attacks that deal massive damage. My favorite gadgets include the inky hatchet with its huge slashing strike that is invaluable for taking out tankier foes and a charging rocket launcher that wonderfully shreds through groups of smaller ones.

It might be tempting to rely on one favorite, but there are plenty of good reasons to try the others. Fully upgrading one tank requires you to spend time with the others, and some dungeons even have specific rewards depending on which you use to complete them. I initially thought that this might prove a frustrating barrier to progression, but soon came to appreciate being made to step out of my comfort zone because all three tanks are equally enjoyable to use with a huge variety of gadgets to discover.

(Image credit: Nintendo)

Every gadget is highly customizable as well, with a plethora of collectible parts that do everything from minor stat upgrades to fundamentally change how they work. You can only add a certain number of parts at a time, so you’ll need to think carefully in order to craft a new build to successfully overcome a particularly tricky challenge.

There’s just as much depth to the wide selection of weapons. The 11 types on offer will all be familiar if you’ve played Splatoon 3, with a good mix of long-range shooters, nimble pistols, sloshing buckets, and so on, all with their own mechanics to master. Tackling more difficult missions rewards more powerful weapons at a strong pace, which, alongside the steady introduction of new rarities with their own unique qualities, further stops everything from becoming stale.

The same is true of the many enemy types. It’s the same malevolent Salmonids from the Salmon Run side modes of Splatoon 2 and 3, but with a healthy number of new varieties to surprise even the most seasoned fish hunters.

It all comes together for an experience that, even when some of the more difficult challenges force you to grind up your power level, remains fresh and exciting like a delicious piece of sashimi throughout.

Should I play Splatoon Raiders?Play it if...

You’ve always wanted a single-player Splatoon
Splatoon Raiders finally delivers the single-player Splatoon experience that many have been waiting for, giving you a new way to discover the franchise without the pressure of PvP.

You want something to play for the long haul
With its wealth of meaty progression systems, Splatoon Raiders gives you loads of goals to work towards. Pick this up if you want a game that you can dip into over and over again.

You’re after a meaty co-op experience
Although primarily a single-player experience, Splatoon Raiders supports online co-op that lets you tackle the majority of its missions with up to three friends.

Don't play it if...

You’re not interested in Splatoon
Splatoon Raiders is a superb game, but it’s not going to win you over if you already disliked the series’ third-person, ink-based combat.

Accessibility features

Like most modern Nintendo releases, Splatoon Raiders is lacking when it comes to accessibility features. It offers the ability to invert both thumbsticks, or use motion controls to aim.

The color of ink is usually random, but you can lock it to either blue or purple in order to be easier to see. In addition to offering harder versions of most missions, the game features three overall difficulty modes which decreases or increases the power of enemies.

How I reviewed Splatoon Raiders

(Image credit: Nintendo)

I played nearly 20 hours of Splatoon Raiders on Nintendo Switch 2 using the Joy-Con 2 controllers in handheld mode. For audio, I used the system’s built-in speaker setup.

I experienced the whole of the game’s story, hitting the credits having tackled all of the major missions on the standard difficulty mode, in addition to some online co-op play.

First reviewed June 2026

ChatGPT Work sounds like something designed to prepare quarterly reports while you sit in meetings, but I suspect some of its best uses would have nothing to do with my job.

This week, I’ve used the new Work mode to help manage some of the life admin tasks I really don’t enjoy, and it’s been surprisingly effective. You see, holidays, household budgets, family events and home renovations are all projects too — they are simply projects we currently manage through a chaotic mixture of browser tabs, messages, spreadsheets and increasingly desperate notes to ourselves.

Perhaps ChatGPT Work could help me with that?

Work mode is accessible from a new menu at the top of the ChatGPT screen. (Image credit: OpenAI/Apple)What is ChatGPT Work?

If you’ve been using ChatGPT over the last week on a paid plan (except the basic Go service), you’ll have noticed a new slider (in the browser version) or a drop-down menu on mobile has appeared at the top of the screen offering a choice between Chat and Work mode.

Work mode is a new agentic mode for longer, more involved tasks that can research and analyze information across connected apps and files. So, if you want a complicated report presented in a finished document, like a spreadsheet or presentation, then Work mode is your new friend.

That is where I thought ChatGPT Work could become interesting for normal life, too. Instead of answering one question and waiting for the next, it can take on a longer task, work across connected files and apps, create the documents and spreadsheets the project requires, and continue checking for changes after you leave.

Work mode is also better at one of the main bugbears of ChatGPT — running tasks at particular times. It can use the new Scheduled Tasks to repeat tasks on a schedule or monitor something for changes.

So, I decided to ignore Work mode's aggressively corporate name and see whether it could handle some actual life admin, starting with planning a holiday.

1. Planning a holiday

I switched the slider to Work and gave it my dates, budget, family requirements and any bookings already sitting in Gmail, because it can search that too. I asked it to research destinations, compare travel and accommodation, create a spreadsheet of costs, produce an itinerary and maintain a list of what still needs booking.

And off it went, happily beavering away on its task, while I was free to get on with something else. I really liked the way it tells you what it’s currently working on, so you can pop in and out of the chat and see what it’s currently doing. It shows sources it's drawing from as it calculates accommodation costs and travel arrangements. You can literally watch it working for you.

The result was a nicely planned holiday in a location optimized for activities and sightseeing all within my budget. It was actually pretty impressive.

2. Become the household financial administrator

For this task, I fed ChatGPT my bills, bank-export spreadsheets, and household documents and asked it to create a working budget, identify unusual increases, forecast annual costs, and produce a dashboard.

A scheduled task then reviewed new bills or price changes and flagged anything worth investigating. Of course, ChatGPT couldn't move my money around, but at least it gave me a clear view of where my money was going and how much I was spending.

It took a long time to get all the data into ChatGPT, but this taught me that the output was only as good as the effort I was willing to spend putting quality data into it. I’d have preferred a way to open the spreadsheets directly in Sheets from ChatGPT, too, but they were available to download.

3. Organize a major family event

My wedding anniversary was coming up, so I wondered how well ChatGPT would perform as an event organizer. I asked it to research a nice venue for taking my wife out for dinner, which it did well, and gave me three good options.

It struck me that if it had been a bigger event, it would have been ideal for researching venues, maintaining a guest list, tracking replies, producing a budget, creating invitations, and even building a simple information website.

Of course, ChatGPT can’t upload the website and host it, but at least it can build the site for you, and you can download it.

4. Manage a home improvement project

If you’re doing a major home improvement project, then you can get ChatGPT's Work mode to compare quotes, analyze plans and product specifications, create a budget, build a timeline, and keep a list of unresolved decisions. It could periodically check for price changes or relevant new messages.

This is probably the clearest example of an ordinary personal task becoming complicated enough to justify a proper agent.

5. Run the family’s weekly logistics

Once I’d connected my calendars and emails to ChatGPT, I could ask it to prepare a weekly family plan covering appointments, school or university commitments, not to mention my travel, meals, and outstanding chores.

I created a Scheduled Task that regenerated the plan each Sunday evening, taking the next week’s tasks into account, and alerted me during the week when something important changed.

This was actually the use of ChatGPT Work Mode I personally found most useful. It’s easy to miss school events, but when they’ve been emailed to you, ChatGPT will know about them and make sure you don’t forget. That’s a lifesaver.

Why Work mode matters

The introduction of ChatGPT Work mode represents a real shift in the way OpenAI is viewing the future development of its core product. It’s an obvious change in emphasis towards work-related tasks, and a hint at where OpenAI sees ChatGPT heading.

But I think it means more than that. ChatGPT’s new Work mode represents the moment ChatGPT stops being somewhere you go for individual answers — a chat — and becomes somewhere where you start to feel like you're working on an ongoing project.

While the first phase of AI’s evolution was the chatbot, we’re now firmly into its second phase — the AI agent. AI that can work independently of our requests and handle complex, ongoing tasks is where the future of AI lies, and Work mode is another step on that path.

People in Europe who used the wearable significantly improved their blood pressure readings over six months.

• Senior director and video game industry advisor at Circana, Mat Piscatella, reports only seven PlayStation games have sold more than 100,000 physical units year-to-date in the US
• He says two games "sold more than 10,000 physical units in the US during the week ending July 11, 2026"
• This comes as fans push Sony to reverse its plan to end the production of physical discs

In light of Sony's decision to retire the production of physical game discs, an industry analyst has reported that physical PlayStation games aren't selling too well in the United States.

Last week, angry PlayStation fans descended on the comment section of the latest Marvel's Wolverine trailer, another effort to push Sony to backtrack on its plan to end the production of physical discs starting January 2028.

As of writing, the video has over 12,600 comments, with the vast majority from fans sharing their thoughts on the decision.

Now, in response to a news story about the situation, Circana senior director and video game industry advisor Mat Piscatella has shared some interesting stats about the state of physical game sales in the US.

Writing on Bluesky, Piscatella said, "Two PlayStation video games sold more than 10,000 physical units in the US during the week ending July 11, 2026.

"Seven have sold more than 100,000 physical units year-to-date." He also clarified later that the figures didn't refer just to first-party PlayStation games, but "total PlayStation. All games, all publishers, all PlayStation platforms."

Addressing the fan backlash, the analyst added, "Commenting is cool, use your voice and all that. But commenting is cheap, [I don't know] idk."

Which games those are is unclear, but global estimates shared earlier this month by Alinea Analytics (via GamesRadar) suggest EA Sports FC 26, Resident Evil Requiem, and 007 First Light could be among those seven. It's estimated for Requiem specifically that 27.8% of its 3.5 million copies sold came from physical discs.

Sony has been notably quiet in the face of the backlash, and according to multiple analysts, despite the fan backlash, the PlayStation maker won't reverse its decision because "digital is just too lucrative."

"They of course knew what the online reaction would look like, and they now wait for this storm to pass," said Dr. Serkan Toto, CEO of Japanese game industry consultancy firm Kantan Games.

"Sony has over 120 million active PlayStation users. Around 50 million people subscribe to PlayStation Plus. As a thought experiment, let's say 500,000 cancel in protest, that would be just 1% of that business gone — of course not enough to Sony to start rethinking. Digital is just too lucrative.

He added, "Their current profit margin has been too weak for years now, so they feel like they must act," Toto added. "From an economic perspective, digital sales just make too much sense especially for platform holders."

• Xbox chief strategy officer Matthew Ball confirms Gears of War: E-Day and Clockwork Revolution "are just the first" exclusive Xbox titles
• Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty says, "There has to be a reason for people to buy an Xbox"
• Ball says this plan doesn't mean every Xbox single-player game will be console exclusive

Xbox has confirmed that the Microsoft-owned company is looking to expand its console-exclusive portfolio, and Gears of War: E-Day and Clockwork Revolution won't be the only two exclusives coming to Xbox consoles and PC.

During the Xbox Games Showcase 2026 last month, Xbox CEO Asha Sharma announced that The Coalition's next Gears of War game will be an Xbox console exclusive, meaning the game won't be coming to PlayStation 5.

Later, Clockwork Revolution, inXile Entertainment's steampunk role-playing game (RPG), will also drop PS5 and launch exclusively on Xbox Series X, Series S, and PC.

Xbox began exploring multi-platform a few years ago, but amidst Microsoft's major Xbox restructuring, which included mass layoffs of 3,200 people, and what Sharma is calling a "reset" of the business, it seems things are reverting to the way things used to be with an emphasis on console exclusivity.

According to Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty, who discussed the matter with GamesRadar, "There has to be a reason for people to buy an Xbox," and console exclusives can act as "a reward" for players.

Xbox chief strategy officer Matthew Ball also confirmed that Gears of War: E-Day and Clockwork Revolution won't be timed exclusives, unlike games like Starfield, but "permanent ones," and the company is looking to embrace exclusivity more.

"I can assure you, Gears of War: E-Day and Clockwork Revolution are not the only titles we're planning," Ball said. "To grow a platform like ours, you have to have exclusive games and services. These are not going to be the only two titles."

Ball added that "large live-service titles" will be multiplatform moving forward, but suggested that this won't mean every Xbox single-player game will be console exclusive.

For instance, Fable will launch on PS5, Xbox and PC on the same day, along with Halo: Campaign Evolved, which is the first Halo game to ever release on PlayStation.

"I wouldn't overly fixate on single-player," he said. "I think that's a good rule of thumb, but it certainly isn't something that's carved in stone."

The executive explained that Microsoft has a "framework" for deciding which games will be exclusive and which ones will be multiplatform and recognizes "this approach is not obvious to all of our players, and we are committed to making this clearer."

Amazon has cut the prices of the Geekom AX8 Max to $619 (was $699) and the flagship Geekom A9 Max is down to $1440 (was $1599) mini PCs, giving you the choice between an affordable all-round performer and a premium AI-focused workstation.

Having tested the two machines, whether you're upgrading a home office, replacing a bulky desktop, or looking for a compact creative machine, both mini PCs offer plenty of performance in a surprisingly small package.

Today's best Geekom mini PC deals

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, Radeon 780M graphics, 16GB DDR5 memory, 1TB PCIe Gen4 SSD, Windows 11 Pro, dual USB4 (40Gbps), dual 2.5GbE LAN, SD card slot, support for up to four 8K displays.View Deal

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M graphics, 32GB DDR5 memory, 2TB PCIe Gen4 SSD, Windows 11 Pro, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, dual USB4, HDMI 2.1, dual 2.5GbE LAN, support for up to four displays, up to 86 TOPS AI performance.View Deal

Which mini PC should you buy?

✅ Choose the AX8 Max if...

You want the best balance between performance and price. The Ryzen 7 8745HS processor, Radeon 780M graphics, 16GB of DDR5 memory, and 1TB SSD provide more than enough power for productivity, photo editing, media creation, multitasking, home servers, and light gaming. Dual 2.5GbE networking, USB4 connectivity, quiet operation, and support for four displays should satisfy most buyers while costing considerably less.

In his review, Alastair summed it up saying: "All-metal build, AI-ready, and support for an 8K monitor make this a powerful office-ready option."

✅ Choose the A9 Max if...

You want as much performance as possible from a compact desktop. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 processor, Radeon 890M graphics, 32GB of DDR5 memory, 2TB SSD, Wi-Fi 7, and dedicated AI hardware make it a stronger choice for AI workloads, software development, video production, 3D rendering, virtualization, and heavy multitasking. It delivers substantially more computing power for professional work.

Alastair's review for this model declared it: "A feature-packed AI-ready mini PC with surprising performance in a compact, ultra-stylish form."

Why we recommend them

These two mini PCs target different very different buyers. The cheaper AX8 Max combines AMD's Ryzen 7 8745HS processor with Radeon 780M graphics, fast DDR5 memory, dual USB4 ports, dual 2.5GbE networking, and support for up to four displays.

Its IceBlast 2.0 cooling system is designed for quiet operation, making it well suited to offices, home workspaces, or always-on NAS duties where low noise is important.

The A9 Max is more for buyers with deeper pockets who need considerably more horsepower. AMD's Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 processor brings dedicated AI acceleration alongside Radeon 890M graphics, while 32GB of DDR5 memory and a 2TB SSD provide plenty of room for demanding applications.

Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, dual USB4 ports, HDMI 2.1, and dual 2.5GbE networking complete a specification that's built for professional content creation, AI applications, large datasets, and intensive multitasking. If you'll actually use that additional performance, this is the model to go for.

Price Context & Historical Value

The AX8 Max's current $619 price is reasonable. It was $499 in October 2025, and went up to $999 in April 2026. Similarly, the A9 Max at $1,439.10 is more expensive than the $999 it was in August 2025, but much cheaper than the $,1799 Amazon was selling it for in May 2026. Looking at the range of prices, the message here is clear: Whichever model you go for, buying at the right time can save you hundreds of dollars.

The Catch: What to know before you buy

The biggest question isn't which mini PC discount is better, but whether you genuinely need the extra performance.

The cheaper AX8 Max already offers enough power for the vast majority of workloads, making it the smarter buy for many people.

The pricier A9 Max only becomes worthwhile if you'll benefit from its faster processor, larger memory and storage, stronger graphics, and dedicated AI capabilities.

• Shop all mini PCs at Amazon

If you're tired of buying ink cartridges every few months, this is a good time to switch to a cartridge-free tank printer. Right now, the HP Smart Tank 5101 is $170 (was $260) at Amazon, and comes with 2 years of ink already included in the box.

For home, dorm room, home office, and small businesses printing a mix of monochrome and color documents and photos, it's an ideal pick. Particularly as HP's ink tank printers tend to have larger tank reservoirs compared to rivals like Epson's EcoTank range.

Today's top HP printer deal

Cartridge-free supertank inkjet all-in-one with print, scan, and copy functions, wireless connectivity, and a 1.2-inch control display. Includes a 100-sheet input tray and 30-sheet output tray. Ships with a full set of refillable ink bottles rated for approximately two years of typical printing.View Deal

Should you buy it?

✅ Buy it if...

You want to save on running costs because bottled ink is much cheaper than inkjet cartridges and you get four bottles free in the box. We recommend ink tank printers if you're chiefly printing documents and photos.

❌ Skip it if...

You're mostly printing text documents - a high-volume laser printer is a much better option for sharper, bolder on-page text.

Why we recommend it

Having tested HP’s Smart Tank line alongside the Epson EcoTank, Canon MegaTank, and Brother INKvestment range, we strongly recommend ink tank printers over traditional inkjet models that use cartridges.

The pitch for tank printers like the HP Smart Tank 5101 is straightforward: instead of buying ink cartridges that run out every few hundred pages, you refill four visible ink tanks from bottles, and each bottle lasts dramatically longer. HP estimates the included set of ink bottles is good for roughly 6000 pages.

Setup leans on HP's Smart app, which walks through Wi-Fi connection and initial configuration with guided, step-by-step prompts rather than dropping you into a printer's typically clunky onboard menu system. Once connected, illuminated smart buttons on the printer itself are meant to guide you through common tasks like printing, scanning, and copying.

Print speed is modest rather than fast — HP rates this around 12 pages per minute for black-and-white and 5 pages per minute for color in normal mode, with the higher-quality "best" setting slower still. That's typical for tank printers in this price range, and fine for everyday home printing, but not the machine to reach for if you regularly print large batches of documents quickly.

Price Context & Historical Value

This isn't the cheapest the 5101 has ever been - back in 2024, it dropped to an all-time low of $140 direct from Amazon. However, it's cheaper now than any third-party seller has sold it before brand-new ($180 was the price back in April 2025). Typically, we see it selling at around the $190 to $250 mark when not on sale. The highest price it's been sold for is $280. Right now, it's also available for $170 at Best Buy, too.

The Catch: What to know before you buy

A few honest caveats worth flagging: some reviewers have reported software quirks and occasional paper jams with this model, and if you print only occasionally rather than regularly, the ink in an inkjet's print head can dry out and clog between uses. This is best suited to households or small offices that print often enough to make the low cost-per-page actually pay off.

For more options, see our guides to the best home printers and best ink tank printers we've personally tested.

• See all printer deals at Best Buy.

• Someone has made a custom version of the Companion Cube case for the Steam Machine
• This DIY effort is on Printables, and can be 3D-printed for those with the hardware and necessary skills
• There are a growing number of custom projects around the Steam Machine, from faceplates through to full-on alternative takes on the gaming PC

Remember the ill-fated Companion Cube case for the Steam Machine? It had the plug pulled on it by Valve a few weeks ago, after maker Dbrand failed to get official permission to make its hard-shell case for the gaming PC, but now the concept has returned, in DIY form.

Tom's Hardware reports that a user on Printables, Jaron, has provided files that allow you to 3D-print your own version of the Dbrand Companion Cube (as flagged on X). You can print the pieces, and a full set of assembly instructions (including smart video illustrations) and extra necessary parts (screws and so forth) are supplied.

As made clear on X, this is a fan-made creation implemented "from scratch" and it's based on images of Dbrand's Companion Cube. Whether it'll attract the attention of Dbrand's own lawyers, well, we'll just have to see, but you'd imagine that some leeway might be granted here given the situation and what happened with Valve.

The creator makes it clear that the case isn't an official product, is nothing to do with Valve, and that it doesn't use "any official assets from any game".

An additional caveat is that Jaron notes: "I have not done any extensive thermal tests but no airflow or venting is blocked, and the additional vent provided by the front face plate aperture logo can help provide a little extra airflow. So I don't believe there will be any cooling issues caused by this case."

My main concerns about the original Dbrand Companion Cube were bound up in cooling issues — especially on warm days, in confined spaces like a TV cabinet — and that remains true with this creation.

Still, if you were disappointed that Dbrand's case was cancelled, and you have a 3D printer and want to have a crack at making your own — and you're pretty decent with a soldering iron — you can now do just that.

Other Steam Machine companions

(Image credit: Goldboat90 on Reddit)

Since the Steam Machine came out, there's inevitably been a lot of interest around the device, despite the high price. So, as well as this clone of the abandoned Companion Cube case, what else is out there in terms of Steam Machine customization?

New faceplates (front panels) are popular, and a much easier project than the above case, such as this example on Reddit (see the image above). I really like the slat effort here, and I can see why it's gone down very well with other Redditors (although I'm not so keen on the blue one).

(Image credit: PoisonISSweet666 on Reddit)

What's also quite common is the number of custom small form-factor (SFF) PCs which are DIY takes on the Steam Machine, generally featuring beefier components (and at the same time, inevitably being larger than Valve's PC). 'The Orange Box' as shared on Reddit is a particularly smart example of one such effort with a strong Valve theme, built in a SilverStone SG05BB-Lite case. It has a Ryzen 7 5800X processor inside and an RX 9060 XT graphics card to give this considerably more pep than Valve's gaming PC.

There are other custom SFF PCs on Printables and this one from 3DCatt, which looks like a sized-up Steam Machine, has very similar aesthetics to fit your living room nicely, and a finished version someone has completed went very well indeed by all accounts.

Of course, there are issues around these alternatives to the Steam Machine as I explored in detail recently, and downsides to these custom SFF builds – albeit definite positives too, better performance being the main one. A PC that looks as good as The Orange Box doesn't hurt, either, and I'm sure we'll see more of these kind of SFF spins on the Steam Machine going forward.

• Only 34% of organizations say they trust their agents' actions
• 77% of businesses in 'agentic chaos' have deployed agents
• Those organizations are focus on the wrong thing (models and tools)

New Boomi data has claimed while 86% of enterprises have evolved from agentic AI pilots to actual production-level deployment, only 34% trust the actions their agents are taking.

However those trust issues don't stem from model intelligence – Boomi argues that data quality, integrations, governance and controls could be to blame.

The research splits respondents into distinct categories, with the bottom quartile for readiness referred to as experiencing 'agentic chaos'. Among those in agentic chaos, as many as 77% are still moving AI agents into production, highlighting a worrying gap.

AI trust is entirely in the hands of enterprises

With more than three in four of the enterprises in agentic chaos still pushing ahead with their plans, Boomi warns they could face unexpected costs from compliance fines, lost customers and operational downtime.

On the flip side, the top quartile was categorized as being in 'agentic control', and more than half (55%) of them said they're highly confident in their agents' decisions and actions.

Additionally, the report criticizes those in agentic chaos for focusing on the wrong thing, with around half (51%) prioritizing AI model or tool maturity instead of the true causes of distrust.

"Agents can only be trusted to act on data that's been properly activated, connected, and governed, and most companies deployed agents before they did that work," CEO Steve Lucas wrote.

At the end of the day, Boomi's data implies that pressure to demonstrate AI value and ROI could actually be leading to premature deployment before the foundations are in place, leaving organizations to play catch-up in a far more inefficient way.