Several malicious PyPI packages were recently observed abusing Gmail to exfiltrate stolen sensitive data and communicate with their operators.
Cybersecurity researchers Socket, who found the packages, reported them to the Python repository and thus helped get them removed from the platform - however the damage has already been done.
According to Socket, there were seven malicious PyPI packages, some of which were sitting on the platform for more than four years. Cumulatively, they had more than 55,000 downloads. Most are an imitation of the legitimate Coffin package, with names like Coffin-Codes-Pro, Coffin-Codes, NET2, Coffin-Codes-NET, Coffin-Codes-2022, Coffin2022, and Coffin-Grave. One was called cfc-bsb.
Keeper is a cybersecurity platform primarily known for its password manager and digital vault, designed to help individuals, families, and businesses securely store and manage passwords, sensitive files, and other private data.
It uses zero-knowledge encryption and offers features like two-factor authentication, dark web monitoring, secure file storage, and breach alerts to protect against cyber threats.
Preferred partner (What does this mean?)View Deal
Compromised hosting accountsThe researchers explained that once the package is installed on the victim device, it connects to Gmail using hardcoded credentials, and contacts the C2 server.
It then creates a tunnel using WebSockets, and since Gmail’s email server is being used for communication, the communication bypasses most firewalls and other security measures.
As a result, the attackers are able to send commands, steal files, run code, and even access systems remotely.
However, it seems that the crooks were mostly interested in crypto theft, since one of the email addresses the malware was reaching out to had the words “blockchain” and “bitcoin” it it:
“Coffin-Codes-Pro establishes a connection to Gmail’s SMTP server using hardcoded credentials, namely sphacoffin@gmail[.]comand a password,” the report says.
“It then sends a message to a second email address, blockchain[.]bitcoins2020@gmail[.]com politely and demurely signaling that the implant is working.”
Socket has warned all Python users running any of the packages in their environment to remove them immediately and rotate keys and credentials as needed.
The researchers also urged everyone to watch for unusual outbound connections, “especially SMTP traffic”, and warned them not to trust a package just because it was a few years old.
"To protect your codebase, always verify package authenticity by checking download counts, publisher history, and GitHub repository links,” they added.
“Regular dependency audits help catch unexpected or malicious packages early. Keep strict access controls on private keys, carefully limiting who can view or import them in development. Use isolated, dedicated environments when testing third-party scripts to contain potentially harmful code.”
Via BleepingComputer
You might also likeDepending on your role in the professional world, your day-to-day routine could change quite a bit. If you're like me, your daily tasks vary from admin to project management, emails, web work, AI work, contract signing, spreadsheets, and beyond. When my days are this well-rounded, having a machine that can adjust to my needs is helpful. In one meeting, I could be typing up a document for a team; the next, I could be drawing out a mind map for a team brainstorming, and so on. With the ThinkPad X13 2-in-1 Gen 5, my one machine can do it all -- at least in theory. But does it rank among the best Lenovo ThinkPad laptops we've reviewed?
(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Lenovo ThinkPad X13 2-in-1 Gen 5: Unboxing & first impressionsIn my time, I've unboxed quite a few Lenovo ThinkPads, let alone Lenovo machines. All of them look about the same. This one was no different. It has good packaging with protective materials; it includes a 65W USB-C power adapter and an integrated stylus with a home within the computer.
I have owned and heavily used iPads for years, so the idea of an integrated stylus, not one magnetically hanging off the end, is a nice change-up. Another piece I just mentioned is that Lenovo chose to use the popular USB-C connection for this computer, not a proprietary charger or an awful barrel connector.
(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)Right off the bat, this business laptop looks and feels like a professional ThinkPad model. At the same time, I do like the matte black finish. It looks stylish and accessible, and I can take this to whatever meetings I may have that day or in whatever job I may have. It's compact and lightweight, making it super easy to carry around, meaning that I would take it around, unlike some super hefty computers I have tested.
The keyboard is functional, comfortable, and familiar, reminding me of every other ThinkPad keyboard in a good way. It's responsive and reliable, and it has good key travel for what it is, allowing for high accuracy levels.
The hinge mechanism is one of the most vital for a 2-in-1 machine. If this hinge is stiff, it will directly detriment the 2-in-1 features. Thankfully, the hinge works great and is easy to use, flying back around without a problem.
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 2-in-1 Gen 5: Design & build quality SpecsProcessor: Up to Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
Graphics: Integrated Intel Graphics (4-core iGPU)
Memory: Up to 64GB LPDDR5x-6400 (soldered)
Storage: Up to 2TB M.2 PCIe 4.0 x4 SSD
Display: 13.3" WUXGA (1920 x 1200) IPS, 300 nits, 16:10 aspect ratio
Ports: 2x USB-C (Thunderbolt 4), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm audio jack, optional Nano SIM slot
Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, optional LTE support
Battery: 41Wh or optional 54.7Wh, Rapid Charge support
Dimensions: 301.7 x 210.8 x 16.4 mm
Weight: Starting at 1.2 kg (2.65 lbs)
The Lenovo ThinkPad X13 2-in-1 Gen 5 has a sleek design, as mentioned; it's got a sturdy magnesium alloy construction, a 360-degree hinge to allow for the 2-in-1 features of folding around and turning into a tablet form, an integrated stylus, an excellent keyboard, and a quality touchpad. It's a great machine in specs.
However, the two main areas I wish it were a little better would be the screen and the battery. The screen is mediocre, but sadly, as most would think of it, it's still good enough for the professional business world. Most of the business world is still rocking 1080p monitors, and they don't think twice. So this monitor is more than satisfactory.
The built-in stylus feels solid, though I'm sure there are going to be plenty of people who lose this stylus, regardless of just how secure this is in the stylus garage.
The hinge works well, though I am nervous about it breaking. But for everyday use, it feels quite lovely to fold this device around and use it as a tablet or back around as a tent for displays or as normal as a laptop.
(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Lenovo ThinkPad X13 2-in-1 Gen 5: In useThe Lenovo ThinkPad X13 2-in-1 Gen 5 is an easy device to take from the office, home, coffee shop, and back to the office again.
It's excellent at handling everyday tasks, though I wouldn't be too far away from any outlets or without one of my portable power stations. Another reason for needing multiple daily charges may be for those heavy users or those who run a large program.
My team benchmarked this machine, and it did not score very well. But that doesn't mean it's automatically a bad machine.
(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Lenovo ThinkPad X13 2-in-1 Gen 5: Final verdictThe Lenovo ThinkPad X13 2-in-1 Gen 5 is a highly portable and flexible machine that can adapt to whatever working mode you need, whether you need to write, mark up a document, draw, present, or read. For an office professional, that flexibility could make a huge difference.
However, this laptop isn't perfect. The screen is nothing special, and the battery life is not the best. So, as long as you don't need an incredibly long battery life or a high-resolution screen, this device is a good one to consider.
We've tested out the best 2-in-1 laptops for the best of both worlds
In Chad, they're a key force in addressing the country's high rate of maternal mortality. But U.S. aid cuts have affected their salaries.
(Image credit: Claire Harbage/NPR)
A team of researchers at Keio University in Japan has developed a breakthrough plastic optical fiber (POF) technology that could transform short-range, high-speed communications in next-generation AI data centers.
Announced ahead of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2025, the group revealed a multicore graded-index POF capable of transmitting data at up to 106.25Gbps per core.
Led by Professor Yasuhiro Koike and Lecturer Kenta Muramoto at the Keio Photonics Research Institute, the project addresses a growing bottleneck in AI infrastructure: the need for ultra-high-capacity, low-latency interconnects between GPUs and accelerators in dense computing environments.
Faster, more scalable AI infrastructureUnlike traditional glass fibers, which require complex ribbonization and multicore connectors, the team’s method allows for multicore POFs to be manufactured in one step using extrusion molding. This dramatically reduces costs and complexity, by a factor of 10 to 100, according to the researchers.
The new extrusion technique allows for mass production of multicore fibers regardless of core count or arrangement, making it adaptable to a wide range of data center designs.
Testing confirmed even after 30 meters of transmission at 106.25Gbps PAM4, signal integrity remained high, with minimal degradation in TDECQ. Bit error rates (BER) were reduced by up to 1/10,000 to 1/100,000 compared to conventional glass fibers.
According to the researchers, "GI-type POF has a property in which the fine non-uniform structure formed inside the core reduces the coherence of light, functioning as a volumetric noise reduction effect throughout the entire optical fiber."
This fine-grained internal structure diffuses optical coherence and acts as a volumetric noise reduction mechanism.
The team’s multicore GI-POF, including a 61-core circular version and a 4-core rectangular variant, reportedly demonstrated high manufacturing reliability and stable transmission across all cores.
Combined with VCSELs (vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers), the system achieved 106.25Gbps PAM4 signal transmission over 30 meters without significant degradation.
Two papers detailing this work have been accepted at OFC 2025. With increasing demand for efficient, high-performance interconnects, Keio’s multicore plastic fiber technology could be key to unlocking faster, more scalable AI infrastructure in the years ahead.
Via PC Watch
(Image credit: Y. Koike and K. Muramoto, OFC 2025) You might also likeRemember that odd Windows 10 problem where the April update for the OS broke part of the Start menu for some people? The good news is that Microsoft has resolved this bug.
If you missed this one, it was a glitch that meant jump lists – extra options that pop up with a right click on an icon – no longer worked properly for some apps in the Start menu.
Windows Latest caught an update from Microsoft about the issue, which both confirmed that this bug is (or was) present in Windows 10, and also that it’s now fixed, thankfully.
In a release health dashboard update, in the known issues section, Microsoft acknowledged the bug and admitted it was more widespread than just the most recent April cumulative update for Windows 10. In fact, this Start menu faux pas has been present since the February preview (optional) update.
Microsoft explains that the problem related to bringing in Microsoft account “control experiences” to the Start Menu, a limited rollout that began in March 2025. (So, it would also have been present in the late February update, which was a preview of the March full release.)
Whatever was happening with introducing that feature caused the jump list functionality to vanish for some Windows 10 users. Upon realizing this, Microsoft paused the rollout of that Microsoft account-related addition to the Start menu on April 25. A fix was piped through, as well.
Microsoft says: “This [jump link] issue was resolved by a service change that was rolled out on April 25, 2025. If you are still facing this issue, please ensure that your device is connected to the internet to receive the automatic resolution that has been rolled out. After the next reboot, this issue should be resolved.”
(Image credit: Microsoft) Analysis: Backporting bluesWindows Latest, which experienced this problem on some of its Windows 10 PCs, has confirmed that the bug is now cured on those devices, so that’s good to hear.
While jump lists – which provide extra context-sensitive abilities for certain apps on the Start menu, like opening recently used files, ‘jumping’ straight to them – might sound like a pretty minor thing, some people use them a lot. And this functionality getting broken really messed with the workflows of those Windows 10 users, and seriously annoyed them (as you could see from some of the complaints aired online).
Back when this bug was first reported, I guessed that it could be the result of backporting features from Windows 11, and that turned out to be the case. The Microsoft account panel being introduced to the Start menu is already in Windows 11, and is being brought to Windows 10 – or it was, anyway, though that work is now paused.
It may be (and probably is) still inbound, then, although I’m not quite sure why Microsoft is providing additions for Windows 10 at this point, when the operating system has less than half a year left on the clock before support runs out. Perhaps that’s a measure of just how important the company feels it is to promote visibility for Microsoft accounts.
You may also like...A study from the American Journal of Psychiatry suggests that psychotherapy is becoming more accessible to people. The study looks at trends in mental health treatment from 2018 to 2021.
(Image credit: simplehappyart/iStockphoto)
Harvard researcher Ari Ne'eman says the policy shifts underway under the Trump administration pose a unique threat to people with disabilities, but that they've fought for rights before and won.
(Image credit: zeljkosantrac/Getty Images)
Israel's cabinet approved a plan to limit the way life-saving aid is distributed in Gaza. And, Diddy's trial begins today wth jury selection.
(Image credit: Jehad Alshrafi)
Marco Rubio serving as both Secretary of State and national security adviser could be "ultimately disadvantageous" to President Trump, says former adviser John Bolton.
(Image credit: Julien de Rosa)
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra is, from a hardware standpoint, a very good smartwatch indeed. It’s got a lovely 1.5-inch 466 x 466px AMOLED display, which is bright and butter-smooth; its case is made of titanium and its screen from Sapphire glass; it looks like a classic dress watch in the black aesthetic of my test model, but the fluoro band keeps things sporty – you could wear this for anything from wakeboarding sessions to weddings, and it wouldn’t be out of place.
It’s got a 480mAh battery that lasts around five days based on our tests – an impressive performance. The screen is pretty and the watch is intuitive to navigate, with health features that stand up to scrutiny. The digital crown, a feature often missed in non-Apple offerings, allows for easy scrolling.
So, will I wear it again? Unfortunately, no.
I love the watch’s design, I love its low price point, and I like the simple layout of its UI. I found it very useful, from the Find My Phone option to the sleep tracking. I think it’s a great watch, but ultimately undeserving of its Ultra moniker.
It tracks 100 sports, but most of these modes are very basic in their metric collection. There are no third-party apps, essential to customizing your smartwatch experience; you’re stuck with what's installed on the watch out of the box. There’s no Strava, no Spotify, no WhatsApp, although you can view messages with the notifications functionality. The watch does have an NFC chip onboard, but it’s not designed to support banking payments. Customization options are limited to an (albeit generous) selection of free watch faces.
The end result is a watch that looks well designed from the outside, but which feels strangely hollow inside. In many respects it’s a high-performing and great-value device, but the lack of features makes it hard to recommend.
Honor Watch 5 Ultra: Price and availability (Image credit: Future)The Honor Watch 5 Ultra is priced at €279 in Europe Union countries, which converts to around $300 / £235 / AU$480. That’s a great price for a watch with this build quality; it’s only a little bit more expensive than the Apple Watch SE.
However, Honor hasn’t yet confirmed when, or where, outside of the EU, you’ll be able to buy the Honor Watch 5 Ultra, due to international restrictions imposed on the brand similar to those on Huawei. We do know that it’ll be compatible with handsets running Android 9.0 and iOS 13.0, as well as the best Honor phones.
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra is, as mentioned above, an extraordinarily well-designed smartwatch (from a hardware standpoint) for its price. As well as high-quality innards like that great battery and powerful processor, the watch has a pleasant, unique octagonal shape with a grade 5 titanium case and bezel.
Sapphire glass protects the touchscreen, and together with the casing and fluoroelastomer band (leather is also available) this is certainly a watch that can withstand knocks, bumps and scrapes. I wore it non-stop for a week, and I was never worried about dinging it.
It looks like a premium dress watch, and the metal casing feels exceptionally premium – it’s certainly a better-looking watch than the otherwise comparable, and more expensive, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra.
The watch has just one button, and the user experience has been vastly improved with the addition of a digital crown, which allows for easy scrolling. The Honor Watch 5 Ultra’s all-in-one button allows for an easy snapshot of your health, among other things, similar to Samsung’s body composition feature.
The fact that the magnetic charger is USB-A rather than the more powerful USB-C is a slight disappointment, but the fast-charging still works fine. Another disappointment is that there’s only one size; like many of its contemporaries, Honor is not taking into account those with smaller wrists.
Things are a little more limited in the features department. With no third-party apps – which elevates the likes of the OnePlus Watch 3 from a nice curiosity into an essential wrist assistant – you miss out on deep interactions with everyday apps like Gmail, your maps service of choice, Keep Notes, Spotify, Strava, Komoot, your Wallet of choice, and so on.
The basic feature set is all you’re going to get. It’s not awful; you get notifications, call dismissal, on-phone music controls, 8GB storage for your music, which you can control with Honor’s native MagicOS Music app, but nothing terribly exciting.
The watch does have an NFC chip, but without a Wallet app you can’t really use it. I can view my WhatsApp messages on my wrist via the basic notifications service, but I can’t reply to them. You can see how my frustrations with the Honor Watch 5 Ultra were mounting during the week I wore it.
Things look a lot better from a health perspective. Honor’s suite of health and fitness features are good, with the new Health Scan feature first on the docket. It takes heart rate, blood oxygen and stress readings, collating them with sleep stats and your height and weight (which you input into the app) to check for outliers that could point to potential issues.
Sleep tracking is also great, with your sleep stages broken down in a similar manner to competitors such as the Samsung Galaxy Ring. The Watch 5 Ultra offers a Sleep Score with some additional insights based on how much sleep it believes you’ve had.
Workout support is solid, with over 100 sports modes, but very few of them offer more sophisticated metrics than heart rate and estimated calories burned. Running and swimming do offer specialized metrics, however, tracking pace per kilometer, stride length and stride frequency on the roads, while counting strokes and taking pool length into account during swimming.
I wore the Honor Watch 5 Ultra for a full week, testing it on runs, in the pool, and during sleep. The watch accurately estimated my steps, coming within a few hundred steps of my Samsung Galaxy Ring, and tracked sleep stages with similar accuracy.
I got a Healthy Morning Report and Sleep Score in the Honor Health app breaking everything down for me, with the usual insights – drink less caffeine during the day for better sleep, and so on – but Honor’s metrics and context are nowhere near as sophisticated as Samsung’s sleep animal chronotypes feature.
Run tracking served me well over the week, with all the usual pace, stride and speed features as well as GPS maps and elevation. A nice touch was a ‘fat reduced’ metric, telling me in one instance that my 8km run burned approximately 4g of fat. Swim tracking was also good, and the watch successfully identified my dominant stroke as ‘mixed’ as I swapped from front crawl to breaststroke during the workout.
The battery performed as described, lasting through around four and a half days of near-constant wear.
I’m happy with the performance here, but it would have been nice to be able to add to the limited features on offer with third-party apps. The frustration of not being able to use so many basic smartwatch functions with my phone made the device less useful, overall, than its competitors.
You own an Honor phone
If you own an Honor phone, this is the perfect accompanyment, and probably Honor’s best smartwatch to date.
You don’t need third-party apps
If you don’t need WhatsApp and the like on your phone, this makes for a great fitness tracker.
You want a good-looking watch
There’s no denying it: this watch, with its titanium casing, looks fab.
Don't buy it if...Money is no object
If you’ve got a bigger budget, you could go for a top-end Garmin watch or Apple Watch Ultra.
You’re on Google or Apple
You’ll be better served with a Wear OS or Apple Watch for better ecosystem integration.View Deal
Also considerApple Watch Series 10
A much better option for iPhone users.
Read our full Apple Watch Series 10 review
OnePlus Watch 3
Similar in design, but a lot better for Wear OS users.
Read our full OnePlus Watch 3 review
How I tested the Honor Watch 5 UltraI wore the Honor Watch 5 Ultra for a full week, draining the battery down completely and monitoring runs, swims and strength workouts. I spent time using the UI to its fullest extent, testing the digital crown and button functionalities, and wore it as my daily driver. I also wore it to bed to examine its sleep tracking capabilities and tried the health monitoring metrics such as the new Health Scan feature.
The trial for the rap mogul, who faces criminal charges for sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy and transporting to engage in prostitution, is underway. Opening statements are slated for May 12.
(Image credit: Photo by Axelle/Bauer-Griffin/FilmMagic)
The recent controversy known as “Signal-Gate” has exposed a glaring truth: even the highest-ranking national security officials sometimes behave like everyday people scrambling through a group chat. In this case, top Trump administration figures unwittingly invited The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, to a Signal thread discussing a live military operation in Yemen. Details ranged from takeoff times for F-18 strikes to surveillance data on key Houthi targets. By any traditional measure, this is precisely the type of information meant for restricted channels—and absolutely off-limits to random add-ins.
Administration leaders insisted that the conversation—despite its clear operational value—was never formally classified. If the Secretary of Defense says it’s “unclassified,” so be it. But for those of us who’ve worked in military or intelligence operations, that’s a semantic sidestep, not a legitimate defense. Revealing real-time strike data isn’t just a security lapse; it could easily compromise missions and endanger lives. Encryption on Signal might protect messages from hackers, but it offers no defense against carelessness—like adding the wrong person to a conversation.
Jeffrey Goldberg, the accidental observer of this unfolding operation, says he originally assumed the messages were fake. A hoax or maybe a foreign intelligence plant. But then the details in the chat began to line up with real-world airstrikes. What started as disbelief gave way to concern—and yet, Goldberg stayed in the thread for days before bowing out. Critics say he should’ve left immediately.
Others argue he was within his rights to confirm what was happening before acting. Legally, he likely did nothing wrong. He didn’t sneak in. He didn’t steal access. He simply opened an invitation that should never have arrived. But ethically, the water’s murkier. If you believe you’re witnessing a potential breach in real time, do you alert someone? Or do you wait it out and report when the story is whole?
Deeper problemsThe deeper problem here isn’t just Goldberg’s decision-making, or even the apparent nonchalance of senior officials discussing war like weekend logistics. It’s a familiar pattern in the United States: a kind of bipartisan amnesia when it comes to accountability for mishandling sensitive information. Before Signal-Gate there was the controversy behind Hillary Clinton’s private email server. Clinton, a former secretary of state, infamously used personal email for official business, with federal agencies ultimately finding that hundreds of her emails contained information that should have been deemed classified.
While her actions caused a political firestorm, she was never prosecuted. The broader pattern repeats across presidencies and party lines: from Donald Trump’s boxes of documents in Mar-a-Lago to Joe Biden’s classified files in a Delaware garage parked next to his corvette. We’ve seen it all—top-secret records stored in bathrooms, basements, and glove compartments. And through it all, one thing remains consistent: no one goes to jail.
We tell ourselves that classification matters. That secrecy protects lives. That mishandling classified information is serious. But when violations occur at the highest levels, we treat them like PR problems instead of national security failures. Federal employees have been fired or prosecuted for far less than what’s now become routine for political leaders.
And in this case, there was no dark-web intrusion or zero-day exploit. Just a group chat. Just one mistaken invite. That’s all it took to put the details of a live military operation into the hands of a journalist. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth was reportedly posting blow-by-blow updates: drone deployments, missile launch schedules, surveillance feeds.
If the Houthis had gained access to this chat—even hours before the first strike—the outcome could’ve endangered lives or compromised the operation. That data should have never seen the light of day, let alone appeared on a consumer messaging platform. It’s the kind of information you’d expect locked down in a SCIF—where digital devices are banned, access is tightly controlled, and no one accidentally adds a reporter to the call sheet.
Heroes and villainsSignal, for what it’s worth, isn’t the villain here. The app boasts strong end-to-end encryption and has even been endorsed by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). CISA’s 2024 guidance specifically lauded end-to-end messaging apps like Signal for “highly targeted officials,” emphasizing that no single tool is foolproof but that strong encryption can significantly mitigate threats. Yet the meltdown here wasn’t about hacking—it was about a reckless group chat invitation. If even the most advanced secure platforms can’t guard against user errors, do we have any hope of fully protecting sensitive data?
This is not just a government issue. Corporate America is just as guilty of letting convenience trump security. Financial data gets sent over Slack. Trade secrets get texted instead of encrypted. Confidential reports accidentally go to the wrong “Steve” in Gmail. We’ve built a culture that prizes speed over caution, where “just shoot me a quick note” is the norm—even when it involves details that could cost companies millions or, in the case of Signal-Gate, risk a classified operation.
At the end of the day, no one in this saga is likely to be prosecuted. The White House swiftly brushed off accusations, claiming no official classification was assigned, and the Yemen strike itself was an outstanding success. Jeffrey Goldberg’s slow departure from the chat may raise eyebrows, but his decision to document it all likely remains protected journalism. The entire drama serves as a reminder that humans, no matter their rank, are prone to careless oversights when it comes to handling precious information.
If we want stricter accountability, we need more than sporadic outrage. We need consistency in enforcing rules and a cultural shift that values caution over convenience. It’s easy to point fingers, but the next data breach—be it from a top official or a small-town entrepreneur—could be just one careless invite away. Signal-Gate might become a footnote in the broader saga of national security mishaps, but it leaves us with one unassailable truth: if even the national-security leadership of the world’s most powerful country can’t secure a chat, the rest of us need to double-check before we hit “send.”
Signal is one of the best encrypted messaging apps for Android - see more.
This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro's Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro
Kosmos 482 has been orbiting the Earth for decades. It's still unknown if the craft will fall to Earth intact or burn up upon atmospheric reentry.
(Image credit: Jack Taylor)
Expect to see a focus on menswear: jackets, trousers, suits, hats, and maybe a cane or two.
(Image credit: Jamie McCarthy)
For three decades the NIH has led 'Safe to Sleep,' helping parents reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and other sleep-related injuries. The NIH cuts come as cases have been rising.
(Image credit: Daniela Jovanovska-Hristovska)