Feed aggregator

This planned destruction of birth control devices is part of the dismantling of USAID services — and linked to allegations by the government that cite abortion. Critics are speaking out.

(Image credit: Aaron Ufumeli)

Hate to be a 'Debbie Downer' but all those prompts we're using to make action figures, Ghibli memes, and the countless less exciting life and business prompts we're stuffing into ChatGPT and other popular generative AI systems are coming at a cost, and one that may be landing on our doorsteps.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan of AI as I think it's the first technology in a generation to have truly society-altering implications but, if you're like me, you've been reading for some time about the ultra-high energy costs associated with Large Language Models (LLMs), especially trianing them, which according to the IEEE, "involves thousands of graphics processing units (GPUs) running continuously for months."

AI model training is resource-intensive. Compared to traditional programming, it's like the difference between playing checkers and interdimensional chess against all the galaxies in the Star Trek universe. The number of parameters these systems examine to learn the essence of something, so they can instantly recognize a dog or a tree, because the models understand what makes up a dog or a tree, is, in human terms, almost inconceivable.

AI understanding is so much more complex than pattern matching. And not only do these models need to understand these things, they also need to know how to replicate representations of trees, dogs, cars, people, and scenarios, and realistically at that.

Feeding the AI monster

It's a heavy lift, and as Penn State Institute of Energy and the Environment noted in its April 2025 report, "By 2030–2035, data centers could account for 20% of global electricity use, putting an immense strain on power grids."

However, those energy costs are rising in real time now, and what I never really accounted for is how energy availability is a sort of zero-sum game. There's only so much of it, and when some part of the grid is eating more than its fair share, the remaining customers have to divvy up what's left and shoulder skyrocketing costs to keep backfilling their energy needs (as well as the energy needs of the data centers).

In the US, we're seeing this scenario play out in our pocketbooks as, according to PJM Interconnection (one of the country's largest energy suppliers), energy bills are rising in response to AI's overwhelming energy demands.

Data centers, which are dotted across the US, are often responsible for serving the cloud-based intelligence needs of systems like ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Meta AI, and others. The need for supporting live responses and fresh training to keep the models in step with current information is putting pressure on our creaky energy infrastructure.

PJM, it seems, is spreading the cost of supporting these Data Centers across the network, and it's hitting customers to the tune of, according to this report, as much as a 20% increase in their energy bills.

In need of a solution yesterday

Because we live on AI Time, there is no easy solution. AI development isn't slowing down to wait for a long-term solution, with OpenAI's GPT-5 expected soon, Agentic AI on the rise, and Artificial General Intelligence on the horizon.

As a result, energy demand will surely rise faster than we can backfill with better energy management, improved infrastructure, and new resources. The International Energy Agency predicts that in the US, "power consumption by data centers is on course to account for almost half of the growth in electricity demand between now and 2030."

The issue is exacerbated by a faltering energy infrastructure in which older energy plants are becoming less reliable, and some new rules that restrict the use of fossil fuels. Most experts agree that renewable resources like solar and wind could help here, but that picture is recently far less sunny.

Tilting at wind mill farms

Earlier this month, the Trump Administration issued an Executive Order to "terminate the clean electricity production and investment tax credits for wind and solar facilities." President Trump famously hates Windmill farms, calling them "garbage."

As the US pumps the brakes on clean and renewable resources, the current grid will continue to huff and puff its way through supporting untold numbers of meme-generating prompts, requests for business proposal summaries, and AI videos featuring people eating cats that turn into pasta (yes, that's a thing).

At home, we'll be opening our latest electricity bills and wondering why the energy bill's too damn high. Perhaps we'll power up ChatGPT and ask in a prompt for an explanation. One could only hope that it points you back to this article, but that seems equally unlikely.

You might also like

• Trump's AI plans will strip AI of intelligence and humanity
• We're all on AI time now and you better get used to it
• Learn How to Get the Most Out of Your Conversations With AI
  

It is the first time that Jewish-led organizations in Israel have made such accusations against the country during nearly 22 months of war.

(Image credit: Abdel Kareem Hana)

• Nvidia's N1X chip has been spotted in a Geekbench result
• The specs show the integrated GPU has 6,144 CUDA cores
• That equals the RTX 5070 for pure core count, but there's much more to factor in when it comes to performance

Remember Nvidia's rumored CPU that caused quite a buzz on the grapevine last year? We've apparently now seen this consumer chip in a benchmark leak, where the spilled spec details are the key aspect.

Tom's Hardware reports that the N1X chip, which is Arm-based (like Qualcomm's Snapdragon X CPUs), has been spotted in a Geekbench result, specifically for the OpenCL (graphics) test, where it scored 46,361.

That score is pretty much meaningless at this point. This is an early engineering sample of the N1X (in theory), and even then, if you want to gauge graphics performance, Geekbench is far from the first choice of synthetic benchmarks.

As noted, though, this gives us a tantalizing glimpse of the spec, which shows that (add salt now) the N1X will have 20 cores, apparently split into a pair of 10-core clusters. That's the processor itself, but we also see the integrated GPU here, which is shown to have 48 Streaming Multiprocessors - that equates to 6,144 CUDA cores.

That sounds like a lot, right? Well, it is, and in fact, those familiar with Nvidia's graphics cards will realize that this is in the ballpark for a mid-range current-gen GPU - to be precise, the RTX 5070, which, in fact, has that exact core count.

Analysis: cautiously optimistic

(Image credit: Nvidia)

So, are we getting a compact consumer chip that could go in budget laptops or handhelds to deliver the same frame rates as the mighty RTX 5070? In a word, no, but the N1X still looks to be shaping up as a promising piece of silicon, and one that will have rivals sitting up and taking notice.

As to the reasons why performance can't simply be drawn from the number of cores seen on the GPU here - it's not a patch on the RTX 5070 in this benchmark, of course - there are other important factors at play aside from the basic core count.

That includes the clock speed and the power supplied to the GPU, which is a very different scenario with integrated graphics in a chip like this versus a full-on graphics card in a desktop PC. As well as considering the power envelope, throw in bandwidth limitations too - in terms of piping tasks over to the system memory, with no on-board VRAM of course - and the upshot is a good deal of headwinds.

That won't stop the N1X from being a potentially sterling performer for an all-in-one chip, but there's not much point trying to guess at the exact level of graphics performance that it might provide at this stage. (Certainly not from the leaked benchmark here, as already noted).

Tom's makes an interesting observation, which is that the leaked specs match Nvidia's GB10 'superchip' built for powerful AI performance and ushering in the era of the tiny AI supercomputer (pictured above). There's no reason why Nvidia couldn't put out another spin on this for consumer-targeted devices, including mini PCs and laptops, and indeed, gamers are getting particularly excited about the possible use in handhelds.

For now, though, this is still very much in rumor territory. If previous speculation is to be believed, we might see Nvidia's consumer CPU revealed later this year, ahead of a launch in early 2026.

You might also like

• Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti review: nearly perfect, but with one major flaw
• The best Nvidia graphics card in 2025: top picks from Team Green for gaming, creating, and more
• AMD could be working on a faster RX 9070 Extreme graphics card

• A petition to repeal the UK Online Safety Act has already reached over 340,000 signatures in just a few days
• The UK Parliament must consider for debate any petition that gets more than 100,000 signatures
• New age verification rules were enforced on July 25, 2025, sparking concerns for people's digital rights

A petition to repeal the UK Online Safety Act has garnered over 340,000 signatures in just a few days after strict new age verification requirements came into force.

Starting from Friday, July 25, 2025, all platforms displaying adult content must verify that all their users are over 18 years old via robust age checks. Social media, gaming services, and dating apps are also required to shield minors from harmful content via similar checks.

These requirements have sparked concerns among politicians, digital rights experts, and technologists who fear that invasive ID checks could lead to data breaches, surveillance, and free speech limitations.

The petition has now crossed 100,000 and so will be considered for debate.The next steps are-Contact your MP, ask them to be at any debate- Explain YOUR issues with the act, my reasons for starting it are probably different than yours for signing it- Keep signing pic.twitter.com/EkYqBdH2ANJuly 25, 2025

"We believe that the scope of the Online Safety Act is far broader and restrictive than is necessary in a free society," reads the petition created by Alex Baynham, a Londoner who launched a new independent party, Build, in December last year.

"We think that Parliament should repeal the act and work towards producing proportionate legislation rather than risking clamping down on civil society talking about trains, football, video games, or even hamsters because it can't deal with individual bad faith actors."

While the UK Parliament must consider for debate any petition that gets more than 100,000 signatures, Baynham encourages anyone concerned to have their say.

To do so, you should sign the petition, contact your MP, and explain the reason you are worried. The deadline is October 22, 2025. Yet, considering the huge response, a debate may be arranged way before that.

Age verification – what are the risks and how to stay safe

The new rules certainly come as a way to stop children from accessing inappropriate and dangerous content online. Yet, age checks also come with significant risks for people's privacy, security, and other rights like free speech and access to information.

You now need to be ready to scan your face, credit card, or ID document if you want to access some content on X, Reddit, or Bluesky in the UK. The same goes if you want to play a new over-18 video game, find a new match on a dating app, or watch a video reserved for adults only.

This involves you trusting these service providers to take good care of this highly sensitive data. Something that, as the recent Tea app hack shows, isn't always possible. A data breach of this magnitude could expose millions of Brits to identity stolen, fraud, and other dangers.

Similarly, some experts also argue that getting rid of online anonymity could lead to higher surveillance by leaving such data access vulnerable to abuse.

Experts also fear the new rules could lead to higher censorship as platforms are now required to delete or block all content defined as harmful.

A virtual private network (VPN) is security software that encrypts all your internet connections and spoofs your real IP address. (Image credit: Getty Images)

Despite the UK's regulator, Ofcom, suggesting against it, Britons have been turning to the best VPN apps en masse to avoid giving up their most precious data to access a website.

Proton VPN, for example, saw a surge in sign-ups, recording an hourly increase of over 1,400% starting from Friday at midnight.

Talking to TechRadar, a Proton spokesperson said: "This clearly shows that adults are concerned about the impact universal age verification laws will have on their privacy."

You might also like

• Age verification requirements have landed in the UK – how the internet will change, and what about your privacy?
• No, VPNs don't guarantee absolute anonymity – but too many users still think they do
• US age verification laws put your privacy at risk – and "VPNs are not a solution”

Hotspot Shield Basic is a mixed bag of a free VPN. Offering differing experiences depending on the app you download, varying success at unblocking streaming services, and speeds that, while fast, can struggle to maintain a connection, it falls short of the best free VPNs.

Despite this, it has seen several improvements to its service since our last round of testing, and, while not perfect, proves to be a more than usable free VPN if you're willing to work within its limitations.

Features

Hotspot Shield Basic is by no means a feature-rich option. That doesn't mean, however, that you don't get a good suite of security tools in the free package. Together, these features provide the same sense of trust that you'd expect from the best VPNs.

Included with the free plan is anti-phishing protection, a kill switch, split tunneling, and IP and DNS leak protection. Plus, on mobile, you can access Hotspot Shield's secure browser from within the app.

Something that became a theme throughout our testing was inconsistency with Hotspot Shield Basic. For example, the iOS app lacks a kill switch on the Basic version, and it's missing entirely on macOS.

A bigger concern surrounding the kill switch was its lack of compatibility. It became apparent in testing that it only works when using the Hydra protocol; what's more, should you switch from Hydra to WireGuard, the killswitch silently deactivates.

This is a major security concern for anyone who relies on a kill switch, especially as users aren't warned about the deactivation, and it underscores Hotspot Shield's position behind the competition in terms of reliable features.

These incompatibility concerns extend to its split tunneling capabilities, too, which is only available on Hydra. Once again, the app doesn't make this clear, and, should you switch to WireGuard at any time, your split-tunneling settings reset. Given this continuous lack of warning and the numerous compatibility issues, it does raise questions surrounding what else may be hiding in the code.

Should you choose to upgrade to a paid Hotspot Shield plan, the only major feature additions to speak of are its streaming and gaming modes, which supposedly optimize the service for these use cases.

This is something most paid VPNs include as standard, so, given Hotspot Shield's steeper cost, I cannot imagine what it does differently to justify the price hike.

Features score: 4/10

Server Network

The ability to pick and choose servers is a fundamental aspect of a paid VPN. Even some free services offer a small, but varied, selection of server locations.

Hotspot Shield Basic has coverage in 4 locations in total, though its website only mentions one. These include the UK, Singapore, Los Angeles, and New York.

For comparison, Hotspot Shield Premium offers 115 locations (though its website claims 125) to choose from worldwide, which, while nowhere near some of the very best VPNs, is a much wider spread.

Server network score: 3/10

Apps

Currently, Hotspot Shield Basic is only available across four platforms: iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS. This leaves omissions in compatibility, most notably, Linux and Smart TVs.

Hotspot Shield seems to have discontinued support for its Chrome extension, as it has been removed from the list of compatible platforms on its website. Plus, it's no longer available to download from the Chrome Web Store.

We've mentioned inconsistencies across apps already, but, as we'll delve into later, something to note is that there's a major disparity between platforms. Most notably, the lack of a kill switch on Mac and the lack of WireGuard, IKEv2, a kill switch, and split-tunneling on its iOS app.

Plus, in testing, we found that depending on your download location, you can find yourself looking at a completely different app. On our Windows testing machine, for example, the app we received from the Windows Store was totally different from the one we got from Hotspot Shield's website.

Upgrading to Hotspot Shield Premium fixes several of these availability issues, including adding Linux, Smart TV, and router compatibility, as well as adding WireGuard and IKEv2 to its iOS app, alongside the kill switch and split-tunneling.

Apps score: 5/10

Ease of use

Limited features mean that there are limited opportunities for confusion, and, in that way, Hotspot Shield Basic claws back some points. However, that doesn't mean its offering is totally simple.

Since migrating the Basic experience into the main Hotspot Shield app, finding your way to the free experience is far from easy on mobile. After loading the app, you have the option to sign up for a free trial (which isn't the Basic plan), and only when you scroll into the smaller print at the bottom of the screen can you find a way of accessing the free app.

Once you've signed in, Hotspot Shield is surprisingly easy to use and pleasant to look at. You're greeted by a black, grey, and blue interface, with icons along the bottom of the screen on mobile and along the left edge on desktop. It bears a resemblance to the layout of NordVPN (albeit without the stacked roster of features).

Hotspot Shield for Windows is impressively clean to look at, resembling the likes of NordVPN. Though it lacks the features to make proper use of the layout (Image credit: Future)

We found accessing the settings easy enough. The menu provides ample description of each option, allowing newer users to quickly get to grips with the functionality, even if these settings lack necessary warnings about silent deactivations (as mentioned earlier).

Our biggest gripe with the usability of Hotspot Shield Basic stems from its mobile apps, which are inundated with ads.

They're (almost) ever-present on the home screen in banner form, and you can be presented with sketchy ads at any given moment if you choose to hop between menus or toggle on features, which adds unwanted wait time to the overall experience. Luckily, using Hotspot Shield Basic on Mac or Windows allows users to avoid these ads.

Ease of use score: 6/10

Speed and performance

No free VPN can match the speeds of today's fastest VPNs, but that doesn't mean they can't impress. In our testing, Hotspot Shield surprised us, recording speeds of 385 Mbps using WireGuard, which is more than enough for stable streaming, searching, and gaming.

Hotspot Shield's proprietary Hydra protocol offered more confusing results. Given that it's based on OpenVPN, it is unsurprising that the speeds were slower than its WireGuard results, achieving a maximum of only 163 Mbps.

During testing, we achieved these speeds when connecting to the US, with slower speeds attained when connecting to UK servers.

Hotspot Shield Basic's UK servers appeared to have a much higher load than its US servers, and this isn't entirely surprising, but it limits your options should you be looking to connect to the UK specifically.

Something to remember is, as mentioned already, Hotspot Shield Basic's kill switch only works on its Hydra protocol, meaning that should you need it, you'll likely experience a slower overall performance.

Speed and performance score: 5/10

Unblocking

Most free VPNs struggle to unblock streaming services, and Hotspot Shield Basic is no different.

In our testing, we achieved mixed results. On Mac and Windows, we failed to unblock any streaming services, including Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video, 9Now, 10Play, and BBC iPlayer.

Despite this, on mobile, we were able to access both Netflix and Prime Video without issue.

If you're looking for the best streaming VPN, we will always recommend you look towards paid services, as all the best VPNs we test proved flawless at unblocking streaming services in our latest round of testing.

Unblocking score: 4/10

Privacy and security

Since our last review, Hotspot Shield has made some headway in improving its security, but it hasn't plugged every hole.

To its credit, the Basic plan now includes a kill switch, and in 2023, the service went through an independent security audit.

That said, some things are still either missing or remain red flags. The issues we've raised already surrounding kill switch and split tunnelling support offer little reassurance or reason to choose Hotspot Shield, especially if your privacy is actively at risk. Plus, while its no-logs policy has now been audited, the use of ads in the mobile apps means there are some ways to identify how devices have been used.

In terms of VPN protocols, Hotspot Shield Basic offers its own Hydra protocol, alongside WireGuard and IKEv2, depending on the platform you use. The Hydra protocol uses strong AES-256 encryption to protect your data, while the WireGuard protocol uses the standard ChaCha20 for encryption.

Privacy and security score: 5/10

Track record

Hotspot Shield's track record isn't quite spotless. In 2018, an information disclosure vulnerability allowed a remote attacker to find out whether a user was connected to the VPN, their approximate location (country), and more. It required the user to visit a booby-trapped website, but the vulnerability was fixed after being disclosed to the company.

In 2020, an exploit allowed a local attacker to use Hotspot Shield to corrupt system files, which, while not a privacy concern, drew our concern.

It has been five years since Hotspot Shield reported any issues of the same magnitude, however, and recent security audits serve to further prove the steps the provider has taken to improve on previous errors.

Track record score: 5/10

Customer Support

Using Hotspot Shield Basic limits your customer support options to the support site, rather than also having access to full 24/7 assistance.

The support site, we found, can be somewhat limited. You can easily find yourself reading an article that's years old and now irrelevant or simply outdated, much like we found with some of the data surrounding locations. Plus, we found various instances of duplicated articles when searching for DNS.

We also found the chatbot to be almost humorously ineffective. When asking "how do I cancel my plan?" it responded "I'm sorry, I don't understand, I'm still learning. Give it another shot with different words". However, on trying "How can I close my account?" the chatbot simply gave up and transferred me to a support agent.

Customer support score: 4/10

Pricing and plans

Being Hotspot Shield's free plan, Hotspot Shield Basic is more limited than its paid counterpart, though not by as much as some of its competitors. The main omissions from the free plan include:

• Gaming and streaming modes
• Linux, Smart TV, and router support
• IKEv2
• 9 additional simultaneous connections (10 in total)
• An iOS kill switch
• Split tunnelling on iOS and Mac
• Full 24/7 support
• 111 more locations (115 total)

However, at $6.66 per month, it's arguably a better value choice to simply use the free version should you, for whatever reason, be set on using Hotspot Shield.

If you're looking to upgrade to a paid VPN, there are much better alternatives for much lower prices, such as Surfshark and NordVPN – it even makes ExpressVPN look cheap.

Pricing and plans score: 4/10

Should you use Hotspot Shield Basic?

Hotspot Shield Basic is an extremely limited free VPN, but that doesn't mean it isn't capable. All free VPNs lack features, but Hotspot Shield Basic's omissions, locations, and unblocking consistency leave much to be desired when compared to the likes of PrivadoVPN Free.

What's more, the inconsistencies across its apps, alongside outdated website information and alarming feature limitations, all leave us concerned about other issues lying in wait.

That said, its speeds are impressive for a free VPN service, and offering unlimited bandwidth is something free VPN users on desktop will be pleased to see, given the limited market across Mac and Windows.

Overall score: 45/100

Alternatives

NordVPN – from $3.39 per month
The best VPN overall
NordVPN is one of the most well-rounded VPN services on the market, offering a combination of top-tier security, blazing-fast speeds, and advanced features. It has been fully audited multiple times to confirm its no-logs policy and the safety of its apps, and alongside a suite of extra security features, NordVPN is one of the best choices for keeping your data safe. You can give it a shot yourself with a 30-day money-back guarantee. View Deal

Surfshark – from $2.19 per month
The best cheap VPN (and also the fastest)
Surfshark is a cheap VPN that offers serious quality. It offers unlimited simultaneous connections on a single subscription and advanced privacy tools like Alternative ID, which allows you to generate new identities on the fly (so you don't have to fork over your real details). Take Surfshark for a risk-free test drive with a 30-day money-back guarantee.View Deal

ExpressVPN - from $4.99 per month
A beginner-friendly VPN package
ExpressVPN has built a reputation as one of the most reliable and secure VPN providers, which is well-deserved. It’s a slightly more expensive VPN than most of the other top-tier providers, but in return, you access a high-speed server network that spans 148 locations in 106 countries. It’s particularly effective at unblocking streaming platforms, including Netflix, BBC iPlayer, and HBO Max. See for yourself with a 30-day money-back guarantee.View Deal

We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.

Proton VPN is one of many internet privacy products developed by Proton, the team of scientists and privacy advocates behind Proton Mail. The suite Proton offers is certainly impressive, but how does its VPN hold up against dedicated VPN providers like NordVPN and ExpressVPN?

The answer is pretty well. The completely free tier is something no other competitor on our top five list offers. With no ads and the same privacy guarantees as paid accounts, it’s an ideal way to trial the service. The paid version? Starting at $9.99 per month, it’s about the average for a top-tier VPN. Stay with me and I’ll go into whether the paid features are worth paying for, as well as how Proton VPN stacks up to the rest of our top five for speeds, unblocking capabilities, privacy, and overall value for money.

Features

There are lots of extra features built into Proton VPN’s paid version of the app, most of which are designed to either enhance your privacy or make the VPN harder to block. For example, there’s Secure Core, which sends your VPN traffic through an initial hardened, physically owned VPN server in a high-security location before sending it on to a second endpoint VPN server. This secures the traffic you’re sending twice, so you can connect to locations without worrying that the endpoint server you use might be hacked, exposing your IP. Although it’s overkill for everyday use, it’s useful if you’re connecting to countries where VPNs are being heavily monitored by the government.

At the other end of the spectrum, there’s Alternative Routing. When enabled, this routes your VPN traffic along a route provided by external third-party servers such as AWS. While this does allow servers outside of ProtonVPN’s remit to see your home IP, it also allows you to connect to services that are otherwise blocking access from Proton VPN’s servers. You’re not going to get past an ISP’s DPI monitoring with this, but it’ll get you access to some sites that would otherwise detect you’re using a VPN.

As you can see so far, Proton VPN provides expert features that fit specific use cases. The same is true of the VPN over Tor feature, which allows you to access the Tor network directly from certain Proton VPN servers. Not everyone will need to access the Tor network, but if you’re a journalist or whistleblower, it might be the standout feature here when you need the extra anonymity.

Not everything is about privacy, though. Proton VPN uses a technology called VPN Accelerator, which uses multithreading and advanced TCP routing to provide you with better speeds when connecting to servers on the other side of the planet. It doesn’t do much when you’re connecting to servers you have a good connection with, but in situations where there’s high latency or excessive packet drop, it allows you to keep a significant portion of your bandwidth where you’d otherwise be slowed to a crawl by network instability.

Of course, there are all the conveniences here too. The VPN also includes a NetShield Ad-blocker, which blocks ads, trackers, and malware, enhancing both privacy and browsing speed. There’s also a kill-switch and split tunneling across all its apps, as well as DNS leak protection thanks to Proton VPN’s own private encrypted DNS servers.

Features score: 8/10

Server network

Proton VPN’s server network is impressive, to say the least. While the rest of our top 5 (barring Surfshark) offer more locations, Proton VPN is the undisputed winner for countries to choose from, offering a staggering 112. Although this leaves it neck and neck with NordVPN when it comes to country coverage, there are some significant differences in terms of where they cover.

What sets Proton VPN apart is the focus on serving areas of the world that have been traditionally underrepresented by VPNs, such as Africa (with 22 locations) and the Middle East (with 14 locations), both of which more than double any other provider on our top five list. Proton VPN also offers the most locations in Asia, too.

Of course, if you’ve already started doing the numbers, you’ll realize that this comes at the cost of offering less impressive coverage in Europe and North America than its competitors. This isn’t to say that Proton VPN doesn’t offer an acceptable range of locations, but if you need state-by-state coverage across the US, you’re better off looking at Private Internet Access instead. Similarly, ExpressVPN has you covered if you want in-depth access to Europe.

Server network score: 8/10

Apps

There’s a Proton VPN app for every major platform, including Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and Linux. There’s some feature disparity between versions of the app, but you can expect roughly the same experience from all of them, including the Linux app, which is a full GUI program. It’s roughly on par with the Windows version, whereas the macOS version doesn’t offer OpenVPN or split tunneling. Not ideal, but all of the security features are available across every platform.

There’s an interesting quirk in Proton VPN’s desktop app design that sets it apart from the rest of the apps in our top 5. When you unfurl the home menu, it displays a map of every VPN location you can access. It’s a very cool piece of design flair, which, when combined with the pleasing purple and black color scheme Proton VPN has going on, results in a piece of software that looks like something out of a spy film.

Proton VPN recently unveiled a major revamp to some of its apps, including its previously less appealing mobile apps. This update has improved not only the customisability of the service, but also how intuitive it feels to use across different platforms, since the apps now match almost entirely across all major platforms.

The Chrome version is rated significantly lower than the other browser extensions from our top 5 VPNs, but it seems a little unfair. With a score of 2.4 on the Apple App Store, many reviews seem to focus on the lack of a free version of the browser add-on. This isn’t the case anymore, as ProtonVPN has recently released a free version of all its browser apps. Some of these complaints are a little more valid, though. While I haven’t noticed it myself while testing the Chrome extension out, there are a lot of complaints about it requiring multiple log-ins to keep connected, which is an easily avoided frustration for users.

Apps score: 8/10

Ease of use

There’s nothing very difficult about the install process, and once you’re logged in, Proton VPN is easy enough to deploy. There’s a guided tour you can take to check out some of the more advanced features, but it’s easy to ignore if you just want to get started. You click the quick connect button, and you’re connected to the nearest server.

For everything else, Proton is functional if a little intimidating for new VPN users. The world map interface lets you plot out your Secure Core connection by hand, giving you a much better idea of how each location will impact your overall connection path. It’s a great way to optimize your connection speed, but it's a little more involved than just clicking a button and closing the app.

Ease of use score: 8/10

Speed and performance

Our latest testing across Proton’s protocols indicates an overall drop in its average speeds, though connecting to our nearest server still capped our testing rig out over 950+ Mbps, which is great news.

Unfortunately, testing from the UK to the US on WireGuard only clocked in at 630Mbps, which is pretty disappointing after recording around 700Mbps in our previous round of testing. At the very least, our latency and jitter readings didn’t pick up anything particularly alarming.

How we perform speed tests

(Image credit: Shutterstock)

We test OpenVPN and WireGuard protocols across a range of speed-test sites throughout the day using a pair of virtual machines from the US and UK, using a connection with 1GB bandwidth in each location. Yes, it’s overkill compared to a normal internet connection, but it gives us a better idea of how the VPN really performs. You can find our full testing methodology here.

The OpenVPN results are also less than we’d hope, only measuring 220Mbps compared to previous results of 400Mbps. We always expect to see a significant drop from OpenVPN compared to WireGuard, but Proton VPN’s OpenVPN speeds used to be fairly impressive. Now, they’re more or less in line with the rest of the pack.

To be clear, these are all speeds that will completely suffice for almost all your internet activity. If you’re on fiber, you might struggle a little to get the most out of your connection while you’re downloading, but otherwise, it’ll handle 4K streaming without any issue at all.

Speed and performance score: 7/10

Unblocking

Given Proton VPN promotes itself as a privacy-first VPN, you'd be forgiven for thinking streaming might not be a strong suit. However, that’s thankfully not the case. We’ve tested the servers against a wide range of streaming services, including regional variants of Netflix (US, UK, Japan, Canada, and Australia) as well as other streaming giants like Amazon Prime and Disney Plus.

In all cases, the Proton VPN servers provided instant access to the services we tested. All you have to do is pick the location you want to watch from and get streaming.

We also tested Proton VPN with more regional services such as BBC iPlayer, Channel 4, ITVX, 10Now, and 9Play, all of which were easily accessible from Proton VPN.

As for torrenting? It’s a breeze. Proton VPN supports port forwarding, so you can easily connect to other peers in a P2P network. There are also a few P2P optimized servers available on Proton VPN, which allowed me to fully connect to the rest of the swarm when downloading Linux ISOs to test.

Unblocking score: 10/10

Privacy and Security

Like every other tool from the Proton team, Proton VPN has been built from the ground up for privacy and security. Depending on which platform you’re using Proton VPN on, you’ll have the choice between OpenVPN, WireGuard, and its proprietary Stealth protocol. OpenVPN and WireGuard have both been stress-tested a thousand times over by real-world deployments and audits, so you don’t have to worry about accidentally choosing an insecure protocol when setting up the service. WireGuard is built to always use the most secure encryption by default, while Proton has set up its OpenVPN deployment to use AES-256, which is about as secure as can be.

Stealth is an obfuscated version of WireGuard that runs over TLS, making it look like normal encrypted browsing data to anyone who’s trying to analyze your traffic to spot a VPN in use. It’s mainly useful for ducking past enterprise rule-based firewalls, but your mileage may vary in how well it works on DPI-based firewalls that ISPs in countries with harsh internet restrictions use.

Of course, Proton has a strict no-logs policy, which has been verified by multiple independent audits, most recently from Securitum in July of 2024. This marks its third consecutive annual no-logs audit, all of which are available to see on Proton VPN’s website without registering for an account. Most providers, including ExpressVPN, will ask you to sign up first, but Proton VPN is demonstrating a commitment to transparency that few VPN providers can match.

While Proton VPN doesn’t use RAM-only servers to run its service, they do employ full-disk encryption on all of its servers, which essentially achieves the same thing. None of your browsing or connection data is ever written to disk, and anyone who attempts to remove one of the servers by force would be completely unable to decrypt the hard disk without an encryption key. Not that they’d find anything useful, anyway.

Proton VPN’s Secure Core architecture adds an extra layer of protection by routing traffic through multiple servers in privacy-friendly countries, effectively defending against network-based attacks. Forward Secrecy is implemented, generating a new encryption key for each session to ensure that even if a key is compromised, past browsing history remains secure.

I can’t say Proton VPN’s malware blocking was particularly good, though. To test it out, we picked 100 brand-new phishing URLs from the anti-phishing experts at OpenPhish and connected to each one with Proton VPN open to see how they’d do. At 11% of malware sites blocked and only 19% of phishing results, Proton VPN could do far better.

Privacy and security score: 8/10

Track record

When you claim that you’re a privacy-first company, you’re going to get a lot of eyes on you. Proton VPN is no exception, which means that some privacy issues from related products tarnish its reputation slightly. In 2019, ProtonMail was forced to log the IP address of a climate activist after a law enforcement request, which significantly undermined its perception as a private email provider.

However, Swiss law works slightly differently for VPN providers. They cannot be compelled to carry out bulk surveillance by either foreign law enforcement or the Swiss government, so Proton VPN as a product is significantly less vulnerable to the same sort of requests. As for individual accounts, Proton VPN has to comply with legally valid cases brought forth by the Swiss courts, even if these are made by a foreign entity. However, Switzerland has no official ties to EU, NATO, or US intelligence sharing pacts, and tends not to recognize law enforcement requests from countries with a poor judicial reputation.

Track record score: 9/10

Customer support

More so than other VPNs in our top 5, Proton VPN feels like it expects you to do a bit of reading to get the most out of your VPN. There’s an incredibly comprehensive knowledge base that very clearly outlines how the whole app works, as well as offering a ton of solutions for common troubleshooting problems. The live chat is only for paying customers, so if you have any trouble signing up, you’ll have to email them or send a support ticket.

Speaking of, its live support isn’t 24/7, unlike NordVPN. Instead, you’ll need to get in touch with a support representative between 9 AM and 5 PM CET. While my interactions with the Proton VPN support staff have been useful, if delayed a little bit (there’s a 24-hour turnaround on any issue when you open a ticket), there have been some poor interactions that resulted in a 2.4 score on Trustpilot.

Customer support score: 7/10

Pricing and plans

Proton VPN starts at $9.99 a month, putting it squarely in the middle of the road as far as pricing. This goes down to $3.99 per month if you buy for the year, or $3.59 per month for two years – both of which are prices exclusive to TechRadar readers. Not the most expensive VPN in the world, but PIA has it beat on price. Anyway, this subscription protects 10 devices on a single plan. Upgrading your plan won’t remove this restriction, but it will give you access to Proton Drive, Mail, Calendar, and Pass for another three dollars a month. If you’re trying to migrate all of your data away from another provider like Google, this is a truly great deal.

There’s also a free version that only offers three locations (The US, the Netherlands, and Japan) but does so with no ads or restrictions whatsoever. You won’t get access to all of the premium features, such as Multi-Hop or Secure Core, but it’s functional enough if you need a secure VPN to cover a single device without paying for it.

Pricing and plans score: 10/10

Should you use Proton VPN?

If you’re looking for a free VPN, get Proton VPN. With an unlimited bandwidth policy, no time-outs, and no ads, Proton VPN is just about the best free VPN you can get today. As a paid VPN? You could do a lot worse. Proton VPN will satisfy just about everyone who uses it, but it falls short in a few key areas where other VPNs simply work better.

It’s fast when it counts, but Surfshark and NordVPN both consistently outdo Proton VPN. All the rest of our top five perform better than Proton VPN at both European and North American locations, especially ExpressVPN and PIA, respectively. Still, these are minor complaints at best. Proton VPN has an extensive list of privacy-focused features, and you can try all of them for yourself with a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Overall score: 83/100

Proton VPN – from $2.99 per month
A great pick for small businesses

Proton offers a huge package for an impressively low cost. Offering services such as email, a password manager, and, of course, an impressive VPN, Proton offers a close competitor to Surfshark in terms of breadth of offering and value. Despite falling short in some areas of our testing, it's a surefire solution to anyone's day-to-day security concerns and offers speeds and security more than good enough to put your mind at ease.View Deal

Proton VPN alternatives

1. NordVPN – from $3.39 per month
The best VPN overall

A VPN with a focus on security, NordVPN not only offers a high-speed VPN but also a built-in antivirus, URL safety checkers, additional server protection with Double VPN, and an ad-blocker using their encrypted DNS solution. It’s slightly more expensive than Surfshark but offers a VPN service second to none. View Deal

2. Surfshark – from $2.19 per month
The best cheap VPN (and also the fastest)
Don't be fooled by the price tag. Surfshark isn't just cheap, it's a full-blown privacy suite with the best value-for-money toolkit I've seen in the market so far. Beyond its great features and even better pricing, it's also the current champion in our speed tests, and has been for a while. Check out this budget-friendly privacy demon with a 30-day money-back guarantee and see how it compares to ExpressVPN.View Deal

3. ExpressVPN – from $4.99 per month
The best VPN for beginners and the most secure

With its lightning-fast speeds and excellent unblocking capabilities, ExpressVPN is one of the best choices out there if you’re willing to pay a premium for performance. Its apps are incredibly polished, and its custom VPN protocol, Lightway, combines high speeds with obfuscation to allow you to connect from anywhere on the planet. View Deal

Proton VPN FAQsHow does Proton VPN keep your data safe?

Proton VPN is based in Switzerland and adheres to a strict no-logs policy, verified by independent audits. It also employs strong encryption standards in addition to security features like Secure Core.

Does Proton VPN work with Netflix?

Yes, Proton VPN successfully unblocks Netflix in the US, UK, Australia, Canada, and Japan. Its speeds are also more than enough to watch 4K content, which makes it a good choice for streaming.

Is Proton VPN good for torrenting?

Proton VPN supports P2P file sharing on dedicated servers. They also use a combination of powerful encryption techniques and audited privacy practices, ensuring your IP won’t be leaked while torrenting.

• WhoFi uses Wi‑Fi signal distortions to fingerprint individuals without visual data
• Deep neural network maps signal changes to identify people with near‑perfect accuracy
• Academic research opens new privacy debates around biometric tracking via Wi‑Fi signals

Researchers at La Sapienza University in Rome have created WhoFi, a system which claims to be able to identify individuals by analyzing Wi‑Fi signals.

The system tracks people by interpreting how their presence disrupts Wi‑Fi patterns, offering a potential alternative to conventional biometric methods.

The technology works by examining Channel State Information, or CSI, which measures changes in Wi‑Fi signals caused by people and objects - and a deep neural network then interprets these disturbances as individual fingerprints.

No cameras or physical contact required

The researchers claim the system delivers 95.5% accuracy in identifying people even under different environmental conditions.

The team behind WhoFi includes Danilo Avola, Daniele Pannone, Dario Montagnini and Emad Emam, who previously proposed a system called EyeFi in 2020. The new system is more accurate and capable of re‑identifying people via non‑visual biometric signatures embedded in CSI.

WhoFi does not rely on cameras or physical contact. It needs only an existing Wi‑Fi network to sense human presence and movement.

The technology can operate in darkness, through walls, and even around obstacles, making it a discreet option compared to video surveillance systems.

The researchers stress that WhoFi does not collect personal data or reveal identities in the conventional sense, noting, “By leveraging non‑visual biometric features embedded in Wi‑Fi CSI, this study offers a privacy‑preserving and robust approach for Wi‑Fi‑based Re‑ID, and it lays the foundation for future work in wireless biometric sensing.”

Still, it’s clear that the ability to track individuals without their knowledge is a potential privacy nightmare.

Breaches of routine privacy can reveal patterns of daily behavior, such as regular locations or movements, potentially exposing sensitive personal habits.

So far, WhoFi remains an academic project with no known plans for commercial or government deployment. Yet the advantages in surveillance capability are clear. It can bypass poor lighting and crowded environments and is less conspicuous than cameras or visual scanners.

A number of similar Wi-Fi-based detection technologies have surfaced in various forms over the years.

Gamgee developed a fall detection system that could alert others if someone fell or if an intruder entered the home.

Comcast’s Xfinity service introduced Wi-Fi Motion, which turns everyday devices like smart fridges, printers, or TVs into motion sensors.

Other researchers have gone further, using Wi-Fi signals to "see" through walls. A UC Santa Barbara team created a system that outlines objects and even reads letters through barriers.

A similar study from Carnegie Mellon University demonstrated how standard Wi-Fi routers can detect a person’s location and body position inside a room.

You can read more about the research behind WhoFi in this paper published on the arXiv preprint server.

Via Tech Xplore

You may also like

• Gamgee's fall detection system could also be used for intruder detection
• Wi-Fi routers can help detect motion in your home, but are also sparking privacy worries
• Researchers used Wi-Fi signals to see through walls. Privacy nightmare waiting to happen?

• Copilot Mode turns the Edge browser into a voice-controlled AI experience
• It can read across all open tabs to get more of the context of what you're doing
• Future features will let Edge perform tasks, like booking tickets

Microsoft has just gone all-in with AI in its Edge browser, launching a new Copilot Mode. The new mode is an opt-in feature that completely changes the way you use the browser.

Now, Edge doesn’t just wait for you to click something, it anticipates what you might like to do next, and you can ask Copilot questions about the content you are currently viewing.

If this does remind you a little too much of Microsoft’s ill-fated Clippy, the ‘helpful’ paperclip assistant that would try and work out what you were doing in Office 97 and try to help you, then don’t worry – Copilot Mode is much less invasive, and can also easily be turned off if you don’t like it.

In fact, I'd go as far as to say that the new Copilot Mode is a natural evolution of the browser, and feels like exactly the right direction for Microsoft to be heading in, especially given the positive reaction to other AI browsers, like Comet from Perplexity.

A stripped back look

(Image credit: Microsoft)

The first thing you notice when you’ve turned Copilot Mode on is that you see a clean, streamlined page with a single input box in the centre. From here, you can access chat, search, and web browsing:

But you don’t even need to type anything to browse the web with Copilot Mode. One of the standout features is that you can now talk to your browser using your voice, giving it commands that mean you can browse the web faster and without having to type at all.

You can do things like open a YouTube video and say something like “go to the section where it shows you how to build a website,” and Copilot will find that exact section in the video for you.

Or, if you’re watching a long video that has a recipe in there somewhere, you can ask Copilot to find the recipe and give it to you in text form:

Seeing the new Copilot Mode in action, it looks very impressive because (in a feature that’s coming soon) you’ll be able to instruct it to handle tasks for you, giving the browser agentic qualities.

So, you could ask Edge to search for something, and even book activities and services using your voice, all in the browser.

The big new features of Copilot in Edge are:

Multi-tab context

Copilot can use AI to get the full context of what you’re exploring online because it will have access to all your open tabs, so it can work out what your priorities are, then act on them.

Actions

This is Microsoft's name for the natural voice navigation I mentioned earlier. You can speak to Copilot about what you are trying to do on a page, so you can get it to compare prices or find particular information on the page.

A ‘coming soon’ addition is that you’ll be able to get Copilot to search your history and credentials for doing more advanced options like booking reservations.

Dynamic pane

Copilot doesn’t get in the way because it appears in a dynamic panel that doesn’t interfere with the web page you’re looking at. This way, your copilot interaction will also avoid being disrupted by pop-ups or advertisements on the web page.

Pick up where you left off

Another ‘coming soon’ feature is the ability for Copilot to continue with a topic you’re researching from the last time you used the browser. So, if you were researching how to start a business, you can just pick up from where you left off last time.

Privacy and security

Once a browser starts to exhibit agentic qualities (the ability to perform tasks like booking things for you), the issue of security naturally arises. To this end, Microsoft promises to only collect data needed to improve your experience. Your data in Copilot for Edge is safe, secure, and never shared without your permission.

How to get Copilot Mode in Edge

While not all the new features are available right now, you can still try out Copilot Mode in your Edge browser right now.

It will be available in the Edge browser on both Windows and Mac. Starting today, you can go to aka.ms/copilot-mode to opt in to Copilot Mode. Once you’ve done that, you can toggle Copilot Mode on or off directly in your settings.

You might also like

• ‘We haven’t figured that out yet’: Sam Altman explains why using ChatGPT as your therapist is still a privacy nightmare
• I created a motivational AI life coach with Character.ai – here’s what happened
• What if Clippy and AI Cloud intelligence had a baby? It would probably look like Microsoft's new Copilot Appearance feature

• Meta is said to be developing a new smartwatch
• It could feature a camera but be light on health features
• We might see it at Meta Connect later this year

Meta’s on-again-off-again relationship with smartwatches might be back on an upswing, as there are reports it will be releasing new wrist-based tech at Meta Connect 2025, which is taking place on September 17 to 18.

That’s according to Digitimes (behind a paywall), who claim Meta is partnering with Chinese manufacturers to bring its latest smartwatch iteration to life.

The device, however, might not be as health-focused as the competition, such as the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 or Apple Watch 10. Instead, Meta, perhaps unsurprisingly, might be focusing on XR technologies.

Its watch would apparently incorporate a camera of some kind, and could complement Meta’s smart glasses, including its much-rumored upcoming pair, which would feature a display for the first time. This sounds like it might be an enhanced version of the wristband Meta Orion testers have used to control those glasses.

However, it’s unclear if the rumored smartwatch would enhance Meta's existing best smart glasses, like the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta HSTN specs.

Light on details

As with all leaks, we should take these details with a pinch of salt. However, Meta has continued its development of wrist-based EMG technology, and so it’s not out of the realm of possibility that it would want to develop something more sophisticated using its research.

What’s more, as I alluded to earlier, this would hardly be the first smartwatch leak we’ve heard from the company, though some rumors were related to its cancellation and subsequent revival, suggesting some previously teased details may no longer be accurate.

Even if a Meta Watch is on the way, many questions remain when it comes to its cost, battery life, specs, affordability, and release date. Even if the device is part of Meta’s 2025 Connect opening keynote, it might just be a teaser of what’s to come rather than a concrete promise of a gadget releasing soon.

I, however, am interested to see what Meta can construct.

I would still rather the device served as an add-on to its smart glasses, much like existing smart watches with phones, rather than a more standalone device, which appears to be on the cards. But if it can incorporate health, fitness, and hand-tracking tools, I’m fine for it to also include a camera and worthwhile Metaverse tools, provided the cost doesn’t get out of hand.

We’ll just have to wait and see what it showcases when Meta’s ready to finally make this much-rumored wearable official.

You might also like

• I took my Meta Quest 3 on a 3,000-mile flight so you don’t have to
• Everything you need to know about Meta’s AI assistant
• Meta halts phone and browser tracking tools

Twenty states and Washington, DC are suing USDA after the agency demanded states turn over sensitive data on applicants for food assistance by July 30.

(Image credit: Spencer Platt)

Steve Inskeep speaks with former U.S. Secretary for Transportation Pete Buttigieg about where Democrats went wrong, how they can regain public trust, and why so many Americans don't believe what the government tells them about the Epstein files.

Want more comprehensive analysis of the most important news of the day, plus a little fun? Subscribe to the Up First newsletter.

This bonus episode of Up First was edited Reena Advani. It was produced by Phil Harrell. We get engineering support from Cena Loffredo. Our Executive Producer is Jay Shaylor.

Runway Aleph can remove objects and people from scenes, generate new camera angles, change objects in a scene and much more.

• A new SteamOS plugin allows gamers to use Lossless Scaling for better performance in games
• It has 2x, 3x, and 4x frame generation options and works with most games
• Input lag and ghosting is less noticeable compared to the previous Decky Framegen plugin

While we await the arrival of more powerful handhelds like the ROG Xbox Ally and the MSI Claw A8, there's a significant performance booster available for SteamOS handhelds – and it breathes new life into portable gaming.

Available on GitHub via xXJSONDeruloXx, a new Decky Loader plugin, 'Decky Lossless Scaling', enables compatibility with Linux, allowing players to use frame generation via the Lossless Scaling application on Steam.

This allows gamers to use frame generation, either through 2x, 3x, or 4x (the amount of interpolated frames) frame generation for higher frame rates, with the latter essentially replicating Nvidia's Multi Frame Generation.

To install (once Lossless Scaling is installed via Steam), download the plugin ZIP folder, enable developer mode in Decky Loader's settings, then simply hit 'install plugin from ZIP', find the folder in the directory you placed it in, and you're done.

It's not the first time frame generation has become accessible to SteamOS, as the Decky Framegen plugin replaces Nvidia's DLSS DLL file with AMD's FSR 3.1 DLL – and this was great since Lossless Scaling wouldn't work on SteamOS. However, this was only available in games that support DLSS frame generation, and it felt sluggish due to increased input lag.

Image 1 of 2

(Image credit: Future / Isaiah Williams)Image 2 of 2

(Image credit: Future / Isaiah Williams)

With Decky Lossless Scaling, the compatibility list of games is bigger. I've tested this on my Asus ROG Ally using Bazzite (a SteamOS clone) in Cyberpunk 2077, Stellar Blade, and Resident Evil 4 remake, and it's a breath of fresh air with frame rates easily hovering around 90 to 100 fps.

Performance is significantly improved while mostly using 2x frame generation, notably when frame rates are already high – and you'll need to adjust graphics settings reasonably to achieve smoother gameplay.

It's worth noting that 3x and 4x frame generation aren't very necessary (at least with the Asus ROG Ally), as input lag becomes unbearable in titles. You can also change this on the fly, without having to restart your game, making it a very convenient tool.

Analysis: Another reminder of why Windows 11 isn't great for handhelds

(Image credit: Future)

Despite the fact that Lossless Scaling on Steam isn't free, this has single-handedly revitalized my love for the Asus ROG Ally. Lossless Scaling has always been available on Windows, but I've avoided using it due to the constant errors with application windows when attempting to get it up and running.

On SteamOS / Bazzite, this isn't a concern, as all you'll need to do is open the side panel and change settings, instead of closing the game window like you would on Windows.

We also know that Windows 11 isn't great for game performance, with SteamOS having major uplifts in this region – which likely explains why I've had a better time using this plugin on Bazzite. For the first time, I've been able to push Resident Evil 4 remake above 50 fps on the ROG Ally, and without major input lag.

Of course, it won't come without ghosting during rapid camera movement, but in my experience, it's not too noticeable to spoil the visual enjoyment. I can only imagine how great this will be for the Steam Deck, or better yet (for those who can afford them), more powerful handhelds like the MSI Claw 8 AI+.

You might also like...

• The Steam Deck 2 and a home console are reportedly in the works – and Sony may be helping to turn the handheld into the portable PlayStation game device I really want
• Best Steam Deck games 2025: top picks for Valve's handheld console
• The Razer Handheld Dock Chroma offers Steam Deck owners a premium design and, of course, plenty of RGB

• Numerous law enforcement agencies banded together to disrupt BlackSuit
• The ransomware operators had multiple websites seized
• No arrests had been made

Notorious ransomware operator BlackSuit has had its infrastructure disrupted by a major law enforcement campaign.

As part of the action, BlackSuit’s main website, accessed through The Onion Router (TOR), was defaced and left with a banner usually propped up by law enforcement after domain seizure.

"This site has been seized by U.S. Homeland Security Investigations as part of a coordinated international law enforcement investigation," the banner said.

Medusa claims responsibility

US Homeland Security, the US Department of Justic (DoJ), the FBI, and other agencies have not yet published an official announcement regarding the takedown, but the DoJ has confirmed the action was part of Operation Checkmate.

Besides the main site, other websites (including the leak site and negotiation site) were also shut down.

This was an international operation, conducted by the US Secret Service, the Dutch National Police, the German State Criminal Police Office, the UK National Crime Agency, the Frankfurt General Prosecutor's Office, the Justice Department, the Ukrainian Cyber Police, Europol, and others.

Bitdefender, a private cybersecurity company, also assisted, saying, "We commend our law enforcement partners for their coordination and determination. Operations like this reinforce the critical role of public-private partnerships in tracking, exposing, and ultimately dismantling ransomware groups that operate in the shadows."

A US Department of Health and Human Services report published in late November 2023 said BlackSuit was first spotted in May that year, showing “striking parallels with Royal, the direct successor of the former notorious Russian-linked Conti operation”.

Unfortunately, taking down websites and seizing infrastructure rarely stops ransomware attacks - it just slows them down a little bit. It usually takes a few weeks for threat actors to recover and continue where they left off, and usually won’t stop until they are arrested.

Via BleepingComputer

You might also like

• Major police operation takes down notorious dark web marketplace Archetyp Market
• Take a look at our guide to the best authenticator app
• We've rounded up the best password managers

Want to get a head start on preparing your Paramount+ watchlist for August 2025? We have you covered.

Aside from being the best streaming service for classics, Paramount+ offers a fresh schedule of new titles each month and it's just revealed the full list of the new movies and shows that will be available to stream in August, including over 50 movies on August 1 alone.

Paramount+ is getting ready for spooky season early this year, bringing six movies from the Paranormal Activity franchise, as well as Halloween II (1981). But there's a slew of other titles for those who think it's too early for the best horror movies just yet, including dramas like Adaptation (2002) and one of my top movies on Letterboxd, The Truman Show (1998).

Everything new on Paramount+ in August 2025

Arriving on August 1

A Time to Kill (movie)
Adaptation (movie)
Adventureland (movie)
Aeon Flux (movie)
American Hustle (movie)
An Invisible Sign (movie)
Annihilation (movie)
Blazing Saddles (movie)
Captive (movie)
Case 39 (movie)
Coming to America (movie)
Crawl (movie)
Death at a Funeral (movie)
Double Jeopardy (movie)
Dr. Seuss' The Lorax (movie)
Event Horizon (movie)
Georgetown (movie)
Gone Baby Gone (movie)
Good Mourning (movie)
Love and Monsters (movie)
Masterminds (movie)
Milk (movie)
Miss Congeniality (movie)
Monster Trucks (movie)
Mother! (movie)
New Jack City (movie)
On the Line (movie)
Paid in Full (movie)
Paranormal Activity (movie)
Paranormal Activity 2 (movie)
Paranormal Activity 3 (movie)
Paranormal Activity 4 (movie)
Paranormal Activity: The Ghost Dimension (movie)
Paranormal Activity: The Marked Ones (movie)
Primal Fear (movie)
Project Almanac (movie)
Rat Race (movie)
Red Eye (movie)
Scouts Guide to the Zombie Apocalypse (movie)
Sexterior Motives (movie)
Shutter Island (movie)
Snake Eyes (movie)
The Assistant (movie)
The Brothers Grimm (movie)
The Ledge (movie)
The Little Rascals (movie)
The Ruins (movie)
The Sense of an Ending (movie)
The Town (movie)
The Truman Show (movie)
The United States of Leland (movie)
The Yards (movie)
Wayne's World (movie)
What Lies Beneath (movie)
Zodiac (movie)

Arriving on August 3

Don’t Knock Twice (movie)

Arriving on August 5

Murder 360 season 1 (TV show)

Arriving on August 6

Jersey Shore Family Vacation season 7, part 2 (TV show)
Blaze and the Monster Machines season 8 (TV show)

Arriving on August 13

PAW Patrol: Jungle Pups special (TV show)

Arriving on August 20

Baby Shark’s Big Show! season 3 (TV show)

Arriving on August 27

Liberation: D-Day to Berlin season 1 (TV show)

Arriving on August 29

Halloween II (movie)

You might also like

• South Park might be staying on Paramount+ after all as the series creators reach an agreement
• Mayor of Kingstown season 4: everything we know so far about the hit Paramount+ show's return
• New Paramount+ series Avatar: Seven Havens will succeed where the Last Airbender live-action adaptation couldn't, and that should make Netflix panic

A touch screen case? Heart rate sensors? Improved noise canceling? Here's what might be coming to Apple's new noise-canceling earbuds later this year. Plus, there's one key feature I'd like to see.

• A new Marvel fan theory about Avengers: Doomsday is circulating online
• Fans think Robert Downey Jr is hinting that he'll play two characters in the MCU film
• A recent Instagram post from Downey Jr is to blame

Robert Downey Jr has sparked a new – and potentially huge – theory among Marvel fans about Avengers: Doomsday.

Last Saturday (July 26), the superstar actor, who'll portray Doctor Victor von Doom in the forthcoming movie, posted a seemingly innocuous video on Instagram.

A post shared by Robert Downey Jr. (@robertdowneyjr)

A photo posted by on

For the most part, the footage shows Downey Jr hitting play on one of his son's (Indio Downey) songs on Spotify. Then, the A-lister briefly hovers his phone camera over a couple of Marvel comics, before turning it on himself to mouth along to the aforementioned tune.

It's those comics that have whipped Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) fans into a frenzy.

Well, one of them, anyway. The first comic we see is a copy of 'Marvel Super Heroes Secret Wars', aka the 12-issue run created by Jim Shooter, Mike Zeck, and Bob Layton that ran from May 1984 to April 1985. That's one of two 'Secret Wars' comic series – the second one coming from Jonathan Hickman and Esad Rebic from May 2015 to January 2016 – that Joe and Anthony Russo told me they're taking inspiration from for Doomsday and its sequel film Avengers: Secret Wars. The fact that Downey Jr is reading said comic series for research purposes, then, is no great surprise.

It's the other literary work, titled 'Iron Man: Legacy of Doom', that's sent MCU devotees into a tailspin, though.

Considering Downey Jr played Tony Stark and his superhero alter-ego Iron Man in the MCU between 2008 and 2019, some observers might think this is just a nod to the two iconic Marvel characters he'll have played by the time Avengers: Secret Wars arrives in December 2027.

However, long-time Marvel fans are reading much more into it and have even crafted a new fan theory about Downey Jr's casting in the Marvel Phase 6 film – a hypothesis that I most certainly hope is wrong. Potentially big spoilers immediately follow for the next two Avengers movies. Turn back now unless you really want to know what fans are theorizing about.

Is Robert Downey Jr playing two characters in Avengers: Doomsday?

Please don't undo Iron Man's heroic sacrifice in Doomsday or Secret Wars, Marvel... (Image credit: Marvel Studios)

For the uninitiated, 'Iron Man: Legacy of Doom' is a four-issue comic series that features another showdown between the eponymous armored superhero and Doom. Okay, the latter is more commonly associated as an archenemy of The Fantastic Four, but he's also engaged in a few tussles with Stark in Marvel Comics.

Indeed, 'Legacy of Doom' is he third time they lock horns on the page. The first came in a two-part Iron Man story called 'Doomquest', which landed on shelves in 1981, while the second occurred in 'The Doctor's Passion', another two-part narrative that was released in 1989.

Fans have been discussing Downey Jr's potential dual in Doomsday on social media platforms like Reddit (Image credit: Reddit)

Okay, but what's this got to do with Downey Jr possibly having a dual role in Avengers 5 and its sequel, which is already one of 2027's most anticipated new movies? Some fans believe Downey Jr is indicating that he's either playing Doom and an Iron Man variant, or confirms his Doom is a variant of Stark himself.

The latter is a theory that's circulated online ever since Downey Jr was revealed to be playing Doom in the MCU at San Diego Comic-Con 2024. Indeed, some fans have queried why Marvel would hire Downey Jr to play Doom if he wasn't an alternate universe's Stark who hadn't seen the errors of his ways like the MCU's Stark did, and who might have found a way to master dark magic and combine it with his self-developed technology. Hey, Ironheart already proved magic and tech can mix, so it's not as if someone like an evil Stark couldn't work out how to blend the two.

Matt Shakman revealed details about the epic #FantasticFour credits scene.Spoilers in this video clip!Full Director Debrief: https://t.co/tZdVt74Gvm pic.twitter.com/98jeSUE4rTJuly 28, 2025

It's the other theory about Downey Jr potentially playing Doom and another version of Stark/Iron Man, though, that's got me worried.

If – and it's a big if – Doomsday adapts some aspect of 'Iron Man: Legacy of Doom', we could have a situation where the aforementioned situation becomes reality. If it does, we could see Downey Jr's Doom and a Stark variant, who'd also be portrayed by the A-lister, fight it out to show how powerful Doom is and/or if Doom needs to acquire some tech that Stark has perfected.

The other possibility is that Downey Jr will reprise his role as Stark/Iron Man in Secret Wars. There have been murmurings that Chris Evans may return as Steve Rogers/Captain America in the sixth Avengers movie, which is reportedly being billed as a celebration of every Marvel comic book universe to ever exist before the MCU undergoes its soft reboot post-Secret Wars. That includes 20th Century Fox's X-Men franchises, Sony's three Spider-Man universes, and the MCU.

Should that prove to be the case, in Marvel's eyes, it wouldn't be a fitting commemoration without Downey Jr's Stark being a part of it. After all, he kickstarted the comic giant's cinematic universe.

Nevertheless, bringing back Downey Jr as Stark in any form would undo his heart-breaking yet heroic sacrifice in 2019's Avengers: Endgame. In my view, that was the fitting albeit bittersweet farewell that he deserved, and I'd be loathe to see him return as Iron Man in Doomsday and/or Secret Wars because of it. This is one fan theory, then, that I don't want to see materialize.

Avengers: Doomsday will be released in theaters on December 18, 2026.

You might also like

• Here's how to watch the Marvel movies in order
• The Fantastic Four: First Steps ending and post-credit scenes explained: how does it set up Avengers: Doomsday and more big Marvel questions answered
• Marvel's next animated series gets new Disney+ launch date – and it'll arrive just one week after The Fantastic Four: First Steps' theatrical release

• NASCAR files reports with state regulators confirming April 2025 attack
• It did not say how many people were affected
• The company is offering free credit monitoring for affected victims

NASCAR has confirmed it suffered a cyberattack and a data breach in April 2025 which saw personal information of racing fans allegedly stolen.

The organization filed data breach reports with attorneys general in multiple US states, describing what had happened, and how it responded, noting the attack started on March 31, 2025, and was spotted - and stopped - on April 3.

During that period, the company said it secured its network, brought in third-party cybersecurity experts to analyze the incident, and notified the appropriate law enforcement.

The subsequent investigation determined that the attackers stole people’s names and Social Security numbers (SSN).

Medusa claims responsibility

While NASCAR did not discuss the nature of the incident, or the identity of the threat actors, ransomware operators known as Medusa had claimed responsibility several months ago.

In April 2025, the group added NASCAR to its data leak site and demanded $4 million in ransom, The Record reported, stating the deadline for payment expired on April 19.

It is unknown if NASCAR paid the ransom demand or not, but there is no evidence that the data leaked to the public.

Medusa is an active threat actor with numerous high-profile victims, including Toyota Financial Services (TFS), which was struck in November 2023, Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS), targeted in February 2023, and Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth), which suffered an incident in September 2023.

Medusa engages in the usual double-extortion tactic, exfiltrating sensitive files from the system before encrypting the entire network. That way, if the victim decides to restore the files from a backup, the group can threaten to release them on the internet, which could bring regulatory fines, class-action lawsuits, and more.

It's not known exactly how many people were affected by the attack, but victims have been offered free credit monitoring services for a year, through Experian IdentityWorks.

You might also like

• FBI warns Scattered Spider hackers are now going after airlines
• Take a look at our guide to the best authenticator app
• We've rounded up the best password managers

• A lack of panoramic glass roof and rear screen help cut costs
• Chinese automotive blogger snapped the disguised vehicles
• Cheaper Model Y is expected to go on sale in China later this year

Elon Musk let the cat out of the bag when he revealed that the company was readying a cheaper alternative to the Model Y during Tesla’s quarterly earnings call, putting an end to the rumors that the company was working on a standalone 'affordable' Tesla.

Instead, the upcoming, simplified Model Y was touted to hold back on some of the additional niceties in pursuit of a cheaper sticker price.

It appears that a popular Chinese blogger, dubbed Garage 42, has photographed some of the first budget Model Ys, with images and videos surfacing on Chinese social media site Weibo.

Although heavily disguised under black cloth, the images show that these cars lack the large panoramic sunroof that makes the current generation Model Y feel so bright and airy. There’s also a lack of infotainment display for rear passengers and the mammoth, full-width LED light bar has been removed from the front and rear.

(Image credit: Weibo)

Currently, the cheapest Model Y in China starts at 250,000 yuan (around $34,750) but it is facing increasingly stiff competition from home-grown talent, with the Xiaomi SU7 and YU7 proving runaway sales successes.

Car News China also points out that Xpeng, Li Auto, and Nio are all readying keenly-priced Model Y rivals in China for the second half of this year, which will continue to eat into potential Tesla sales.

It is not known whether this trimmed-down Model Y will be sold in other markets in this form, but Tesla’s sales are suffering on a global scale, so we’d expect to see a Model Y slot in somewhere between the current cheapest Model Y and the most expensive Model 3.

Tesla doubles-down on autonomous driving

(Image credit: Tesla)

Despite stripping back the Model Y in an attempt to boost sales, Elon Musk announced that Tesla recently signed a $16.5 billion deal with Samsung, which will see the Korean tech giant provide chip technology for upcoming generations of Tesla’s hardware array.

With the latest cars running Tesla’s Hardware 4 (or HW4, for short), this deal will ensure the company has the latest and fastest chipset when its vehicles move to HW6 – seeing as HW5 is already contractually covered by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).

With each new generation of semiconductor, Software Defined Vehicles (SDV) become more intelligent and more capable, boasting the sort of processing power required for advanced levels of autonomous driving.

However, the news has irked many long-standing Tesla owners, as Elon Musk promised back in 2016 that even on version 2 of its hardware, all vehicles would be capable of full unsupervised self-driving – something the brand has yet to crack.

There have been multiple attempts by owners to demand refunds for Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) systems over false advertising claims, which cost up to $15,000 on top of a car’s list price at points.

Tesla continues to promise more from its FSD systems, recently stating that "unsupervised" versions will come later this year. But with the company still investing so heavily in the next generation of computing, it has a number of critics skeptical about the true capabilities of Tesla’s technology.

You might also like

• I’ve driven the Xpeng G6 and it doesn’t hide its main ambition – stealing the Tesla Model Y’s crown
• Xiaomi's new Tesla-rivaling SUV has a cockpit-style panoramic windshield display and can charge in just 12 minutes
• More bad news for Tesla – Xiaomi's new Model Y rival beats it on price and just smashed pre-order records