The beloved Muppet, created in 1955, will deliver the commencement address at the University of Maryland, the alma mater of his creator Jim Henson.
(Image credit: Kaitlin Newman)
Ezo is a surprisingly straightforward IT asset management software for inventory across multiple locations. The platform provides clear visibility into asset lifecycles, from acquisition to retirement. Its clean interface avoids overwhelming users with unnecessary complexity. We were impressed with how quickly we could implement the system during testing and start tracking equipment without extensive training.
The software shines in its asset tracking capabilities. It allows you to assign equipment to users and maintain accountability throughout the organization. During our tests, Ezo's QR code scanning worked flawlessly, making check-ins and check-outs a breeze. The reporting tools offered meaningful insights into asset use, though the dashboard could have been more intuitive for first-time users.
Ezo does have some weaknesses in its mobile experience. We noticed a few performance issues during testing. There was lag when processing multiple items at once, but the mobile interface feels less polished than the desktop version in general. Despite these minor drawbacks, the overall value remains strong. Especially for remote businesses with inventory management needs across multiple locations, Ezo could be a keeper.
Ezo's preventive maintenance features were a point of highlight during testing. They help you schedule and track regular equipment upkeep. We appreciated the automated alerts for upcoming maintenance tasks, which could extend the lifespan of assets. Being able to generate custom reports also helps you analyze inventory data on demand. However, we wish there were more advanced filtering options for different scenarios.
(Image credit: Ezo)Ezo: Plans and pricingEzo has a tiered pricing system for businesses of all sizes. The Basic plan starts at $9.99 per user monthly (billed annually). It includes core asset tracking, limited to 500 assets, and basic reporting. But we found that the Professional plan at $19.99 per user monthly offers the best value. It provides unlimited asset tracking, advanced reporting, and maintenance scheduling, which greatly improved our asset management workflow.
Enterprise pricing comes through custom quotes. This includes extra features like API access, dedicated support, and custom integrations with current business systems. Ezo also offers a 14-day free trial for all new users. All plans come with free updates and standard customer support. However, premium support is only available at higher tiers.
(Image credit: Ezo)Ezo: FeaturesEzo offers a complete set of asset management tools that can simplify inventory tracking and maintenance scheduling for any organization. We found the platform's easy-to-use interface very helpful quick implementation across departments. But beyond that, here are the features that stood out to us the most:
Asset tracking
The core asset tracking feature lets you document equipment details, location, and user assignments. We were impressed by how easily we could create and attach QR codes to physical assets. This could make check-ins and check-outs much more efficient. The system also retains a full history of each asset, including maintenance records and location changes.
Maintenance management
Ezo's maintenance scheduling feature was a big hit during our testing. You can set recurring maintenance tasks based on time or usage. The system automatically generates work orders and notifies team members. This could help you avoid costly repairs and extend the life of your assets by addressing issues early on.
Mobile accessibility
Ezo has a mobile app for teams working in the field or from different locations, available on both iOS and Android. It manages basic tasks like asset scanning, status updates, and location changes well in most cases. The option to take photos of assets and link them to inventory records could be helpful during equipment audits. But, we noticed synchronization delays in areas with weak connectivity and the app lacks many features available to desktop users.
User management
The platform has a strong user management system in place. It lets administrators assign specific permissions and access levels to team members. We loved the option to create custom roles that fit different organizations. Plus the audit trail feature tracks changes per user, assisting with compliance.
(Image credit: Ezo)Ezo: AnalyticsEzo's reporting features offer detailed insights into asset use, maintenance history, and inventory status. In our tests, the pre-built report templates met most of business scenarios. They provided quick access to depreciation schedules, maintenance compliance, and asset allocation metrics. Being able to schedule automated report delivery via email was a nice touch.
A custom report builder lets you create tailored analyses. You can select specific data points and visualization options to answer specific business questions. We liked the easy drag-and-drop interface. It allowed us to build complex reports without any SQL knowledge. However, we found that generating reports with very large datasets sometimes slowed performance. Some optimization here could help organizations with extensive inventory records.
(Image credit: Ezo)Ezo: Ease of useWe found Ezo's interface very easy to use. We were able to set up quickly and start tracking equipment without much training. QR code scanning worked perfectly during our tests. It made asset check-ins and check-outs much faster than manual methods. However, some user reviews mention an initial learning curve, especially when using the advanced search function.
Ezo's mobile app offers key features for teams in the field, but we noticed some performance issues during testing. We liked being able to take photos of assets and attach them to inventory records during audits. This can be very helpful for keeping accurate documentation.
But despite a few minor UI issues, our overall user experience was intuitive. Most professionals can quickly adapt to the platform's main features, then explore advanced use cases over time.
(Image credit: Ezo)Ezo: SupportEzo provides various support options: email, phone, and chat. Their team is available on weekdays from 7 am to 5 pm US Eastern time. They also offer after-hours help for urgent issues.
In our evaluation, we found the customer service team very responsive. They typically reply within the same day and focus on finding solutions to our questions. Each license includes up to 90 minutes of onboarding help. This allowed us to quickly learn key features like asset tracking workflows, reporting capabilities, and best practices to optimize our processes.
(Image credit: Ezo)Ezo: SecurityEzo shows a strong commitment to security with several key certifications. These include ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2 compliance, and CSA STAR Level 1 certification. Plus the platform runs on Amazon Web Services (AWS), a top cloud computing service known for its strong security measures.
Ezo: The CompetitionThere are several alternatives to Ezo, like Asset Panda, Sortly, and GoCodes. Each has similar asset tracking features but with different pricing and capabilities.
Asset Panda is a cloud-based platform that excels in warranty tracking and multi-location management. Sortly specializes in inventory management, offering great expiration date tracking and reminder features. GoCodes stands out for its strong equipment tracking and workflow management, appealing to organizations that want to prevent lost or stolen tools.
Ezo's pricing places it in the mid-range compared to its competitors. But ultimately, choosing the right platform depends on specific needs. Ezo generally offers a good balance of functionality and value for most business asset management needs.
Ezo: Final VerdictEzo offers a strong asset management experience. It balances ease of use with effective tracking. The platform shines particularly in showing asset lifecycles. Key features include QR code scanning, maintenance scheduling, and reporting tools that give insights into asset use.
We found some limits in the mobile app, plus some user interface areas could use an upgrade. Still, the overall value is high. Especially for businesses facing inventory challenges across many locations or with remote workers.
In March, AWS announced the general availability of its new multi-agent capabilities, bringing the technology into the hands of businesses across almost every industry. Until now, organizations have mostly relied on single-agent AI systems, which handle individual tasks but often struggle with complex workflows.
These systems can also break down when businesses encounter unexpected scenarios outside their traditional data pipelines. Google also recently announced ADK (Agent Development Kit) for developing multi-agent systems and A2A (Agent to Agent) protocol for agents to communicate with each other, signaling a broader industry shift toward collaborative AI frameworks.
The general availability of multi-agent systems changes the game for startups. Instead of a single AI managing tasks in isolation, these systems feature robust and manageable networks of independent agents working collaboratively to divide skills, optimize workflows and adapt to shifting challenges. Unlike single-agent models, multi-agent systems operate with a division of labor, assigning specialized roles to each agent for greater efficiency.
They can process dynamic and unseen scenarios without requiring pre-coded instructions, and since the systems exist in software, they can be easily developed and continuously improved.
Let's explore how startups can leverage multi-agent systems and ensure seamless integration alongside human teams.
Unlocking value for startupsStartups can leverage multi-agent systems across several critical business functions, beginning with research and analysis. These systems excel at data gathering, web searches, and report generation through the process of retrieving, organizing and dynamically refining information.
This allows systems to streamline complex research workflows, enabling startups to operate more efficiently and make informed decisions at scale. Meanwhile, in sales processes, multi-agent systems improve efficiency by automating lead qualification, outreach and follow-ups. AI-driven sales development representatives (AI SDRs) can automate these repetitive tasks, reducing the need for manual intervention while enabling teams to focus on strategic engagement.
Many startups may also need to extract structured data from unstructured sources. For example, multi-agent systems automate web scraping and adjust to website format changes in real time, eliminating the need for continuous manual maintenance.
Unlike traditional data pipelines that require constant debugging, multi-agent systems autonomously manage tasks, reducing the need for large development teams. This is particularly useful for startups as they can ensure up-to-date data without expanding technical teams too quickly.
How businesses can implement multi-agent systemsStartups seeking to gain outsized results by leveraging these systems can do so through two impactful approaches.
One option is purchasing existing solutions to replace complex data flows and human-driven processes. This is the most cost-effective choice for many startups, as they can automate and replace complex sales pipelines and make data workflows more robust, reducing reliance on humans for repetitive tasks.
But for startups with unique operational needs, developing a multi-agent system in-house is ideal. Traditional systems require coding for every possible scenario – a rigid and time-consuming approach that is prone to human error. Multi-agent systems, in contrast, are tailored for all possible scenarios and dynamically adapt to complexities, making them a more flexible and scalable alternative.
Regardless of whether startups buy or build, multi-agent systems provide a game-changing opportunity to streamline operations, reduce manual workloads and improve scalability.
Overcoming challenges in AI integrationDespite its advantages, integrating multi-agent systems comes with certain challenges. Decision-making by agents within the multi-agent system isn’t always transparent since the systems often rely on large language models (LLMs) that have billions of parameters. This makes it challenging to diagnose failures, especially when a system works in one case but fails in another.
Additionally, multi-agent systems deal with dynamic, unstructured data, meaning they must validate AI-generated outputs across various input sources - from websites to documents, scanned documents and chat and meeting transcripts. This makes it a greater challenge to balance robustness to changes and accuracy. Beyond this, multi-agent systems face difficulties in maintaining effectiveness and require monitoring and updates in response to input source changes, which often break traditional scraping methods.
Startups can overcome these challenges by embracing new tools, such as LangFuse, LangSmith, HoneyHive and Phoenix, which are designed to enhance monitoring, debugging, and testing in multi-agent environments. Equally important is fostering a workplace culture that embraces AI agents as collaborators, not replacements. Startups should ensure buy-in across stakeholders and educate employees on the value of AI augmentation to allow a smooth adoption.
Transparency is also key. Founders must be open with staff about how multi-agent systems will be used to ensure a smooth collaboration between human and AI coworkers.
Achieving outsized resultsThe AI field is moving fast, making it difficult for experts, let alone everyday users, to keep up to date with each new model or tool that is released. Some small teams may therefore see multi-agent systems as unattainable.
However, the startups that successfully implement them into their workstreams – whether by purchasing or building custom solutions – will gain a competitive edge. Multi-agent systems bridge the gap between AI and human collaboration that can’t be achieved with traditional single-agent systems.
For startups focused on growth, multi-agent systems are the best tool in their arsenal to compete with incumbents who might be stuck with an outdated tech stack. The ability to streamline operations, reduce manual workload, and scale intelligently makes multi-agent systems an invaluable tool in achieving outsized results.
We've compiled a list of the best landing page creators.
This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro's Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro
Lawyers for survivors said they won't support the agreement, which they say was negotiated behind closed doors.
(Image credit: Gerald Herbert)
Every now and then, a refreshingly unique camera hits the market, and the Fujifilm X half retro compact is one of those few examples.
It's a niche, digital alternative to half-frame film cameras such as the Pentax 17, and for most people is the better choice of the two.
Fujifilm has really let loose in designing the X half, and it's a love letter to film photography that offers quirky features such as a touch-sensitive film canister window-like screen, plus a Film Camera mode. Each idea, weird as they might seem for digital, actually make perfect sense in the spirit of film.
There's no other digital camera that comes as close to the film photography experience as the X half, and the beauty is that you can take or leave many of these features, and nor are you hobbled by the ongoing costs that come with using an actual film camera.
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)On a technical level, the X half is pretty basic. The vertical-format 1-inch sensor records JPEG-only photos up to 18MP, while video is limited to vertical Full HD.
To mark the X half down for such reasons, however, misses the point – this camera is a fun creative tool in all the right ways. Those perceived limitations are rightly there, in the spirit of film – the look of your pictures is locked in once you press the shutter.
The X half's compact size and retro looks also appeal. It tips the scales at just 8.5oz / 240g, plus its fixed 32mm f/2.8 lens is tiny, meaning you can fit the camera into a pocket.
I love the unique design touches – that touch-sensitive LCD which emulates a film canister window, and a lever that mimics the film wind lever for diptych composites.
It produces what are actually pretty decent images from its 1-inch sensor, and offers respectable battery life and robust build, all for a not unreasonable price.
I've only spent an hour trying out the X half, but I've already bought into the concept. Fujifilm has clearly had fun designing the X half, and that means I can have fun using it.
Fujifilm X half: Price and availabilityFujifilm is launching the X half globally on June 12, and it will cost $849 / £699 / AU$1,349. Considering the build quality and the features on board, it's a reasonable price, even if it hardly makes this an impulse purchase.
There are three colors to choose from: silver, charcoal and black. I think the silver version is most in keeping with the spirit of the X half, but I can also envisage it being produced in additional colors down the line if it sells well, which I expect to be the case.
There are no dedicated accessories at launch – a half-leather case could look the part.
Alongside the camera, Fujifilm announced a dedicated app for the X half, which will be available ahead of the camera, though it wasn't available when I tried the camera out.
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Fujifilm X half: specsQuick SpecsCamera type:
Compact
Lens
10.8mm f/2.8 (32mm equivalent)
Sensor:
Vertical 1-inch, 13.3 x 8.8mm, 18MP
Video:
Full HD, vertical
Battery:
880 shots
Weight:
8.5oz / 240g
Fujifilm X half: designThe X half is unmistakably a Fujifilm camera, while packing unique features and sharing certain similarities with the Pentax 17.
It's a well-built and lightweight retro compact, packing a tiny fixed lens with a 32mm-equivalent focal length and mechanical aperture, which can be manually adjusted between its f/2.8 to f/11 settings using a handy lever.
There's an on-off switch on the top of the camera. When set to on, a lever – which is designed to mimic a film-wind lever – juts out from the camera for easy access. This lever is used to activate the diptych feature, which we'll get into shortly.
The shutter button is set within an exposure compensation dial, and I must say that all of these controls ooze a reassuring quality, with a suitably stubborn resistance.
Also on the top is a coldshoe for mounting accessories, but it's not a hotshoe, so that means no accessories such as a flash gun.
The top plate of the X half, with its film wind lever folded away. (Image credit: Tim Coleman)In the absence of optional flash accessories, a low-powered LED flash sits above the lens to provide some fill light that's particularly handy for indoor close-ups. The flash can be turned on and off using a switch on the X half's left side, while on the other side is a USB-C port for charging the camera.
Battery life is a healthy 880 shots, with the X half utilizing the WP126S battery that's been a long time staple in the Fujifilm X series range, used by cameras like the X100VI.
On the back there's a small and basic optical viewfinder at the top-left, which comes in handy particularly for the Film Camera mode – more on this shortly.
There are no control buttons or dials on the camera's rear, just a photo / video switch and a playback mode. Instead, the action happens through the twin touch displays – and this is where things get really interesting.
The rear of the X half, with its twin touch displays and optical viewfinder. (Image credit: Tim Coleman)First up, I adore the new touch-sensitive LCD which (by default) mimics the film canister window present in many film cameras.
A swipe up or down on this display scrolls through the various Film Simulation modes, with a stripped back selection of 13 looks.
Then there's another unique touch LCD: a vertical display for live view and the X half's four menus, each of which is accessed via a swipe from one of the four sides.
One menu accesses basic camera settings such as exposure mode, another the Film Simulations and picture effects – Fujifilm has added several new film photography-inspired effects, including light leak.
Image 1 of 6(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 2 of 6(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 3 of 6(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 4 of 6(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 5 of 6(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 6 of 6(Image credit: Tim Coleman)With a picture effect active or when in another menu, that second LCD displays the picture effects or camera settings instead of Film Simulations, effectively making it a secondary navigation tool.
Another menu on the main LCD accesses a new Film Camera mode, which is a fabulous concept. Select your 'film roll' – if you're not already familiar with them, Fujifilm Film Simulation color modes mimic the look of actual Fujifilm film stock – and the number of shots you'd like in the film, and start shooting.
Once the Film Camera mode is active, the display is inactive, so your only compositional tool is the optical viewfinder.
You're also locked into the selected Film Simulation and settings such as ISO. And with no raw format available, once you've picked your look, you've made your bed. It's a fun idea which pays homage to film photography.
Fujifilm X half: PerformanceIf you take photography seriously, a word of advice – don't write the Fujifilm X half off on the basis of its image-making qualities, which on the face of it are pretty basic.
For one, JPEG-only photos and no raw? That's a bold move by Fujifilm, but I get it. After all, the X half is supposed to be like a film camera, and since when could you work from uncompressed raw film data to make drastic color and exposure adjustments? Locking in the look at the point of capture is in the spirit of film.
The X half's video-making skills are also fairly stripped back, maxing out at Full HD resolution, but once again I don't mind that.
Those vertical photos and videos are recorded using a vertical 1-inch sensor. It's a 20MP 2:3 aspect sensor, but output is 3:4, which means the maximum photo resolution is 18MP.
Just taking the 3:4 portion of the 2:3 sensor also means the lens, which would be a 28mm-equivalent focal length, is actually more like 32mm – that's a suitable perspective for everyday photography.
Image 1 of 9(Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 2 of 9(Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 3 of 9(Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 4 of 9(Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 5 of 9(Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 6 of 9(Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 7 of 9(Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 8 of 9(Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 9 of 9(Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)For close-ups, that 1-inch sensor and maximum f/2.8 aperture lens can capture nice blurry backgrounds, especially when you're pushing nearer the minimum 0.1m focus distance.
Fujifilm's Film Simulations number 20 in all, but the X half includes a stripped-back selection of 13 of the supposedly most popular looks.
It also gets some new picture effects, so in addition to the gimmicky mirror and toy-camera effects you have options like light leak, which suit the film photography ethos at play here.
Image 1 of 7Shoot close and use the maximum f/2.8 aperture, and soft backgrounds are possible (Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 2 of 7The same photo but with the aperture set to f/5.6 (Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 3 of 7Here's the vivid Velvia Film Simulation (Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 4 of 7And the standard Provia (Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 5 of 7The monochrome Astia features too (Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 6 of 7Sepia makes a surprise appearance in the most popular Film Simulations (Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 7 of 7And here's a more filmic look (Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Fujifilm's tagline in the X half marketing is, 'Half the size, twice the story'. This refers to the half-frame format of the pictures and the diptych-making feature for photos and videos.
The diptych feature is activated using the 'film-wind' lever, and composites two 3:4 images side by side, just as a half-frame film camera does onto a roll of 35mm film.
However, they're not strictly half-sized; the resolution of each photo is preserved, meaning a diptych composite is doubled in width, from the 3648 x 4864 pixels of each photo to a 7296 x 4864 pixel composite with a 3:2 aspect – that's the same aspect as a frame of 35mm film.
Image 1 of 3Two vertical photos composited into a diptych – just like with half-frame film cameras (Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 2 of 3(Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)Image 3 of 3(Image credit: Tim Coleman / Viktoria Shilets)There's a modest selection of autofocus modes. As far as I could tell, focus locked to the central portion of the frame; however, there's face-detection autofocus too, which is active anywhere in the frame.
If you approach the X half as a fun camera for casual snaps with some creative looks to try out, you'll be wholly satisfied.
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Fujifilm X half: Also consider Pentax 17Should you want the genuine half-frame film experience the Pentax 17 is an obvious recommendation, sharing as it does many design similarities with the Fujifilm X half. The Pentax 17 is cheaper as an initial outlay, but remember there will be the ongoing film costs. A super-cheap half frame alternative would be the Kodak Ektar.
Read our in-depth Pentax 17 review
Ricoh GR IIIIf it's the compact proportions and fixed wide-angle lens that appeal, then the Ricoh GR III is a pricier, high-quality alternative. Photos-wise, however, it's a 'regular' camera, with larger APS-C sensor and 24MP stills.
Read our in-depth Ricoh GR III review
How I tested the Fujifilm X halfFujifilm briefed me on the X half before I had around one hour to try it out, taking a walk through London's Chinatown. Along the way I tried out the various Film Simulation modes, picture effects, and the diptych feature, both for photos and video.
I also shot a series of images adjusting the lens aperture stop by stop, from its maximum f/2.8 aperture to f/11, and examined those images to compare image quality at each setting. I've also switched between various autofocus modes.
Fujifilm has outdone itself with the new X half – a retro compact camera that packs some of its wackiest and outright funnest ideas yet, all inspired by film photography.
There’s a clue to the X half’s inspiration in the name – it’s a digital reimagining of half-frame film cameras like the Pentax 17. I've already tried the X half, and it was a much needed dose of fun – check out my X half hands-on review.
To facilitate half frame, the X half's 18MP JPEG photos are taken in 3 x 4 vertical format, recorded onto a vertical 1-inch sensor, and composed using the unique vertical LCD.
Alongside that fixed screen is a secondary screen that mimics the film canister window you see on many film cameras, and there's a fun surprise here – it’s touch sensitive, and allows you to swipe up or down to select one of Fujifilm’s Film Simulations. If this charming feature doesn't make its way into future Fujifilm cameras, I'd be shocked.
Film Simulation color effects are well known – they're inspired by Fujifilm film stock, and have helped to cement Fujifilm’s popularity over the last 10 years through cameras like the X100VI. The X half offers a stripped-back selection of 13 popular Film Simulations, including Provia and Astia.
You'd think all of the above would be enough to secure the X half's unique status, but Fujifilm has really let loose, with even more features for film photography fans to enjoy.
The LCD emulating a film cannister window with Velvia Film Simulation, and the vertical LCD (Image credit: Tim Coleman)Simulating film to another levelGoing one step further from that twin-screen combo and vertical shooting, there’s a Film Camera mode. This locks in your chosen Film Simulation and camera settings such as ISO, and disables the screen preview, leaving you to compose your shots via the optical viewfinder instead, as if you're shooting with film.
Once your ‘film’ is used up – either 36, 54 or 72 shots – you can exit the mode and view the screen once more, and make changes to settings again.
Film Camera mode is such a fun feature, and for me is the closest experience to film photography that I've had using a digital camera – and it's optional.
The film wind lever tucked in with the camera off. In the on position, the lever sticks out for an easy reach. (Image credit: Tim Coleman)Then there's what is in effect a film wind lever, which in this case, through 'cranking', is used to create diptychs – that’s two vertical shots side by side. These are recorded individually through the vertical 1-inch sensor, but then composited afterwards and displayed just like you'd get with a half-frame film camera on a roll of 35mm film.
Again, you can take or leave the diptych feature. I reckon it's a nice to have – working out how image pairs complement each other stretches your creative muscles.
We also get some completely new picture effects, almost all of which are film photography-inspired and include light leak, expired film and halation.
Full HD video capture is also possible, and the diptych effect can be applied to both photos and videos, which is really neat.
This is all packaged in a palm-sized, premium-feel compact that features a fixed 32mm f/2.8 lens with a mechanical aperture, plus the same battery as used in cameras like the X100VI for an 880-shot life, and which weighs just 240g.
Fujifilm X half in charcoal (left), silver (middle) and black (right). (Image credit: Tim Coleman)Fujifilm has created a dedicated app for the X half, which can be used to make diptychs, and upload and view images, plus the camera can connect wirelessly to one of Fujifilm’s Instax printers for on-the-go printing.
The app wasn't available when I tested the camera, but will be downloadable from early June. Meanwhile, the Fujifilm X half itself will be available globally from June 12 in silver, charcoal and black, and costs $849 / £699 / AU$1,349.
I’ve been reviewing digital cameras for 15 years, and the Fujifilm X half has to be one of the funnest yet – a compact camera with a difference. You can configure it in a way that’s as close to a film camera as you’re going to get with digital, plus it packs the retro look and feel that we’ve come to expect from Fujifilm.
What do you think of the Fujifilm X half? Let us know in the comments below.
You might also likeAs attendees departed an event held by a Jewish advocacy organization in D.C. on Wednesday night, a shooter opened fire, killing two. Later, he chanted "free Palestine," D.C. police officials said.
(Image credit: WJLA)
The Dell S3225QC offers a unique value proposition. I want to say that it’s the best value 32-inch all-rounder if you want awesome 4K OLED picture quality and epic integrated sound, backed up by a serviceable 120Hz refresh rate and a satisfying contrasting figure of 1500000:1, but there are a handful of things holding back my praise.
Dell has positioned the S3225QC as an all-rounder, claiming that its mix of features is “perfect for play, school and work” when it was announced back at CES 2025 in January. At first principles I think this monitor is capable of shifting between these different use cases quite well – the 5 x 5W speakers that run across the bottom of the display output brilliant audio, the screen itself doesn’t blur text and is perfect for a mix of writing documents, viewing content and playing games, and the 32-inch size is definitely a boon for blowing up whatever task you're performing.
Backed up by a design that’s fairly inoffensive and doesn’t take up much space on a desk, the S3225QC may be the perfect multitasking display for your home or office. The addition of two USB-C ports on the back and an accessible USB-C port on the front is also very welcome, especially for quickly charging a phone or mouse, or for transferring data to your computer in a pinch. One port pops in and out of the monitor, allowing it to be tucked away when not used.
(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)Additionally, unlike some OLED monitors, the display doesn’t have annoying care programs – shortly after the monitor is turned off following a lengthy period of use, it’ll automatically shift into refreshing mode, which will take between six and eight minutes. Dell recommends refreshing the pixels every four hours, but I wasn't bugged once about doing this.
However there’s one big thing that’s holding Dell’s new OLED monitor back – its severe lack of ports.
I’m annoyed that the only inputs for displaying audio and video are HDMI and a Display Port-capable USB-C, and my particular use case, as somebody who bases everything they do in their home around a monitor, kind of underscores this as a weakness (so please excuse my incoming tangent). Most streaming services don’t show video in the highest resolution when functioning through a browser, and to watch Andor on Disney+ in all its glory, I wanted to connect my Google TV streamer to the S3225QC.
(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)But the Google TV Streamer, as you’d expect, uses HDMI to connect to a display – I couldn’t use the Display Port-capable USB-C connection, as the TV Streamer doesn’t output audio and video through its USB-C port, and so my only solution was to physically swap the HDMI cord between my PC and the Streamer.
It’s not the end of the world and indeed the monitor displayed 4K streaming content brilliantly, along with all the things I played, but it begs the question: why are there only two audio/video inputs in the first place? This will surely be an issue for folks in similar positions looking for a more encompassing all-rounder solution, and this lack of connections is anomalous among similarly priced screens.
For people that might have one primary computer connected via HDMI and, separately, a laptop via the DP-Alt USB-C, this is unlikely to be a problem – but still be ready to factor in purchasing a USB-C to HDMI or USB-C to Display Port cable to get over these hurdles depending on what you’re doing at your PC. A quick and easy solution may be an external HDMI splitter.
Dell S3225QC: price and availability(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)For a monitor that comes with high-quality integrated audio, an OLED panel and a massive 32-inch size, the Dell S3225QC is priced quite competitively. There are very few monitors on the market that are offering this particular combination of features, which makes it difficult to compare, but the feature set is pretty impressive.
The price is slightly undermined by a couple of factors, the foremost being a lack of input ports, with only HDMI and a USB-C (DP-Alt) available. Another is the comparatively low refresh rate for an OLED panel, limited to 120Hz at a maximum 4K resolution. There is, however, a built-in USB hub, so keyboards, mice and other peripherals are able to connect directly to the PC via the monitor’s USB-C ports.
If you’re shopping for an alternative, I’d recommend the MSI MPG 271QRX (a 27-inch gaming OLED monitor with a higher refresh rate) or the Dell UltraSharp U3225QE (a non-OLED 32-inch monitor with similar specs, more ports and a lower price).
Screen size:
31.6-inch
Aspect ratio:
16:9
Resolution:
3,840 x 2,160 (120Hz)
Brightness:
250 cd/㎡ / 1,000 cd/㎡ HDR peak
Response time:
0.03ms (GTG)
Viewing angle:
178˚/178˚
Contrast ratio:
1,500,000:1
Color support:
1.07B
Inputs:
1X HDMI 2.1, 1X USB-C (5Gbps upstream, Display Port 1.4 alt mode, 90W power delivery), 2X USB-C 5Gbps downstream ports (data, 15W power delivery)
Weight:
10kg (22.05 lbs)
Dell S3225QC: design(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)The Dell S3225QC is designed to be an all-purpose monitor, and so it has a neutral design without anything too jarring. The monitor is only available in a white colorway with an anti-glare matte OLED panel, sitting atop five integrated speakers.
While this speaker system appears at first glance to have a webcam inbuilt, it’s actually a proximity sensor that detects the user’s distance from the screen and adjusts sound quality accordingly. More on that in the Features section.
The stand has a coarse texture to it and is completely white. It doesn’t take up much room, with the stand consisting of a long cylindrical pole and the monitor footing being a flat rectangle. The monitor doesn’t take up too much room on a desk and has a fair amount of height, tilt and swivel adjustment to it.
(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)One of the USB-C ports physically moves in and out from underneath the monitor, allowing for quick access. It’s an interesting aspect of the monitor that seems a little overdesigned – while popping a component in and out is convenient, I’m confused as to why this needs to move at all.
Surely an immobile USB-C port pointed downward would have achieved the same goal without the risk of getting stuck or broken? The rest of the ports are located around the back, while the monitor’s joystick and power button can be found to the bottom right of the screen’s backside.
The Dell S3225QC is aimed at being an all encompassing display, capable of switching between work and play without a problem. It has a gorgeous screen and a handful of useful USB-C ports across the back and front, though there's a crippling lack of audio/video ports.
The main feature propping up the all-rounder goal is the sound system running across the bottom of the display, which offers enhanced surround-sound audio made possible thanks to its spatial tracking camera. The end product is frankly the best audio I’ve ever heard from a monitor, though I did find that two red lights would often appear on the soundbar, indicating that my head couldn’t be seen by the tracking tech – meaning sound wasn't always able to be optimized for my position. As someone whose home entertainment setup is based around their computer desk, I love monitors with inbuilt audio, so this focus on high-end audio is a win for me.
There’s a USB-C port on the front and the two USB-C ports around the back, one of which doubles as a Display Port alternative for audio/video (AV) signals, meaning you can plug your monitor in with a USB-C port and use it as a second screen. Those regular USB-C ports can serve as sockets for your laptop and keyboard while still using the DP-capable USB-C port for AV. It’s a great alternative to a dedicated USB hub, and that DP-capable USB-C port can even double as a 90W charger, meaning you won’t need a separate power cable for most connected laptops (beastly gaming models excepted).
(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)I liked how well laid-out the inbuilt operating system was, and how easy it was to quickly change settings using the joystick on the back. It’s so fast and responsive that I would often adjust things like audio directly through the monitor.
What burned me the most about the monitor was its lack of any additional HDMI or Display Port sockets. All that’s on offer is a HDMI port (4K@120Hz) and the aforementioned DP-capable USB-C port. Somebody that’s merely switching between a laptop and a desktop PC likely won’t have any issue with the ports that are in use, but for my purposes (I tend to have a Chromecast connected to my screen), the arrangement resulted in an awkward dance of unplugging and plugging in cables constantly. For a monitor billed on versatility and being able to fulfill so many needs, it’s absolutely baffling how limiting it is in its design.
It’s tempting to say that the Dell S3225QC makes compromises to service a broad appeal, but I personally don’t think the specs reflect that – the hardware set here is solid.
Dell has sourced its 4K OLED panel from Samsung, and with the Korean tech giant so good at making such screens, it’s a win on all fronts. Colors pop perfectly and as it's OLED, blacks are perfect as they aren’t lit by pixels. A contrast rate of 150,000:1 keeps picture quality accurate, though brightness is limited to a maximum of 250nits/1,000nits HDR peak (a fairly standard figure for an OLED, but low compared to high-end non-OLEDs).
I think the OLED panel is fairly inconsequential when you’re using the monitor for stuff like writing up documents, editing things together or simply when casually browsing the web – and you’ll be better off purchasing a much cheaper display if these are the only things you’re doing. There’s no haziness around typed characters to be seen, but these days you don’t have to go up-market for a clear monitor to do work on.
(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)It’s with stuff like gaming and streaming video that the S3225QC can really pull out the stops. The 120Hz refresh rate might seem a little low for PC gaming, but let me be clear – it’s perfectly fine, and unless you're an especially demanding (or competitive) gamer, 120Hz is more than enough for fast and fluid gameplay. I use a fairly high-performance gaming PC and though in many games I can far exceed a 120 fps framerate, I’ve never been left wanting more.
As we've previously mentioned, the audio system is fitted with a spatial camera that detects how close you are to the screen. With that detected, it then adjusts the sound profile to best suit the distance. In my experience it worked brilliantly, though the sensor certainly suffered when there wasn’t much light (and I tend to keep lights off in my office... I’m a bit of a caveman).
The S3225QC will still deliver rich sound without detecting your distance from the panel, however when the sensor isn’t capable of making that measurement, it displays two dark red lights beside the camera (appearing in the image below as purple). It’s a tad annoying when watching something cinematic in the dark, as the sensor is quite reliant on being in a well-lit environment, but ultimately when it doesn't completely work the results are harmless.
(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)Should I buy the Dell S3225QC monitor?Attributes
Notes
Rating
Value
A unique feature set at a fair enough cost makes the Dell S3225QC a screen to consider.
5 / 5
Design
An unassuming white colorway and a nice OLED panel positions the S3225QC well for specific settings.
4 / 5
Performance
There’s no holding the S3225QC back as an all-rounder monitor for work and play.
5 / 5
Features
The inclusion of high-quality speakers across the bottom is nice, but there is a severe lack of HDMI/DP ports.
4 / 5
Average rating
Although we’d like to see more inputs, the Dell S3225QC is likely to be a good fit for folks looking for a one-stop solution monitor.
4.5 / 5
Buy it if...You’re craving an OLED monitor that isn’t completely gaming-oriented
Dell’s new OLED screen is sure to be a hit among non-gamers looking for gorgeous picture quality, or gamers looking to skip aggressive aesthetics and craving speaker sound.
You want brilliant in-built sound
I’ve never had sound on a monitor impress me more than the S3225QC and it’ll be hard to beat its room-filling audio.
You want an all-encompassing solution
Audio/video inputs for USB-C (DP) and HDMI make the S3225QC uniquely suited for switching between a desktop and laptop setup.
Don't buy it if...You crave more input freedom
Only offering two audio/video inputs makes the S3225QC a much less capable monitor, especially for one marketed as being all-purpose.
You want to save money
The Dell S3225QC is fairly priced but still doesn’t come cheap and you may be better off saving some money and going with a non-OLED alternative for less.
You want better gaming specs
You’ll find higher refresh rates and lower response times on similarly priced 4K OLED monitors intended for gamers.
Also considerSamsung Odyssey OLED G81SF
Want a more gaming-oriented monitor? The Samsung Odyssey OLED G81SF is priced similarly and is available as a 27-inch or 32-inch screen.
Read our full Samsung Odyssey OLED G81SF review
Screen size:
27-inch
Aspect ratio:
16:9
Resolution:
3,840 x 2,160
Brightness:
250 cd/㎡ / 1,300 cd/㎡ HDR peak
Response time:
0.03ms (GTG)
Viewing angle:
178˚/178˚
Contrast ratio:
1,000,000:1
Color support:
Max 1B
Inputs:
2X HDMI, 1X Display Port, 2X USB-A, 1X USB-B Upstream, 1X 3.5 headphone jack
Weight:
6.89kg (15.2 Ibs)
MSI MPG 271QRX
Often found cheaper with discounts and fitted with a 2K OLED panel, the MSI MPG 271QRX is a worthwhile solution if you’re not craving such high-end specs.
Read our full MSI MPG 271QRX review
Screen size:
26.5-inch
Aspect ratio:
16:9
Resolution:
2560 x 1440p
Brightness:
250 cd/㎡ / 1,000 cd/㎡ HDR
Response time:
0.03ms (GtG)
Viewing angle:
178˚(R/L), 178˚(U/D)
Contrast ratio:
1500000:1
Color support:
1.07B
Inputs:
1x Display Port, 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB-C (DP alt.) and 90W PD charging, 2x USB 2.0 Type-A 1, 1x USB 2.0 Type-B
Weight:
10.8kg (24 lbs)
Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub
After the USB-C connectivity that the S3225QC offers, but don’t care for OLED or the high-end sound? Dell’s 32-inch Thunderbolt Hub monitor is much cheaper with many more ports on offer.
Read our full Dell Ultrasharp 32 4K Thunderbolt hub review
Screen size:
31.5-inch
Aspect ratio:
16:9
Resolution:
3,840 x 2,160
Brightness:
450 cd/㎡, 500 cd/㎡ HDR peak
Response time:
5ms (GTG)
Viewing angle:
178˚/178˚
Contrast ratio:
3,000:1
Color support:
1.07B
Inputs:
2x Thunderbolt 4, 2x Display Port 1.4 (in/out), 1x HDMI 2.1, 7 USB-A downstream, 3.5mm audio-out
Weight:
9.34kg (20.59 lbs)
How I tested the Dell S3225QC monitorDuring my time with the Dell S3225QC, I tried to use the monitor as a hub for everything I did. This included using it to get work done on my laptop by connecting a MacBook Air to the display via USB-C, but also connecting my gaming computer to it for video games and my Google TV Streamer for movies and TV shows.
Most of my time with my monitor was spent using it for entertainment, playing games like Assassin’s Creed Shadows, Counter-Strike 2, Wreckfest, Forza Motorsport, R.E.P.O, Marvel Rivals and Star Wars Outlaws, but I also took time to watch plenty of Disney+, Netflix and YouTube content on the display. I also used it for music streaming via Spotify.
Of course the monitor was also used for more casual things – doomscrolling on Bluesky, browsing websites on Chrome and messaging friends on Instagram and Messenger for example.
First review May 2025.
EU officials say the broadcaster for years has played an important role providing news to areas where the press can't operate freely
(Image credit: Omar Havana)
At the center of the sweeping bill is trillions in tax cuts, which Republicans aim to partially offset through changes to safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP.
(Image credit: Kevin Dietsch)
I write about vacuum cleaners for a living, and while performance varies, most new models these days tend to look roughly the same.
So when news of a new addition to the Dyson vacuum lineup landed in my inbox, I expected to see something similar to its existing models: slick and high-quality, but not especially distinctive or surprising.
How wrong I was.
The newly unveiled Dyson PencilVac doesn't just have an unusual name, it's all-round one of the most unique vacuums I've seen. This brand knows what it's doing in this marketplace – it makes some of the best cordless vacuums you can buy, and today's very best Dyson vacuums include features you still can't find anywhere else.
So while the PencilVac strays a long way from the tried-and-tested formula of what works for vacuum cleaners, I'm very optimistic about its performance. Here's a rundown of the most intriguing features in this new launch...
1. It's ridiculously thinThe most immediately noticeable thing about the PencilVac is that it's incredibly streamlined. Without the floorhead, the whole thing is 1.5 inches / 3.8cm in diameter. To make that possible, the brand had to develop a tiny new motor – the Dyson Hyperdymium 140k motor is just 1.1 inches / 2.8cm wide, and hidden entirely within the handle.
The PencilVac is also impressively lightweight, clocking in at 4lbs / 1.8kg. For context, the lightest option in our best cordless vacuum roundup right now is 5.7lbs / 2.6kg, and there are a number of models that weigh over 6.6lbs / 3kg.
All the PencilVac's mechanics are shrunk down and fitted inside the handle (Image credit: Dyson)Generally, when you shrink down a vacuum, you sacrifice power. That's why handheld vacuums tend to be much less 'sucky' than full-sized options. That holds true for the PencilVac – there's 55AW of suction, compared to 115AW for the V8 (the oldest Dyson stick vacuum in the current range) and a massive 280AW for the latest-and-greatest Gen5detect. However, while it's unlikely to be suitable for a truly deep clean, that's still a decent amount of suction for the size and weight.
As a side note, the 1.5-inch / 3.8cm diameter isn't incidental. Brand founder James Dyson says, "I have long wanted to make a vacuum of only 38mm diameter (the same as my latest hair dryer, the Supersonic r)". The Dyson Supersonic r is the pipe-shaped dryer that was originally released for professionals only, but recently joined the main consumer range.
2. There are cones instead of rollersMoving down to the business end, and you'll find the new 'Fluffycones' floorhead. It sounds like a Pokémon, but it's actually a reimagined cleaner head. Vacuums traditionally have one brush roll, maximum two, and they're tube-shaped. The Dyson PencilVac has four brushrolls, and they're all conical.
There's logic to the tapering shape: it helps direct long hair along the roll and into the dust cup, whereas with parallel rollers the hair tends to just wrap around and stay there, until your rip it off or attack it with scissors. Dyson's hair screw tool also has a conical brush roll, and works exactly as it's meant to when it comes to tackling long hair.
Rather than one parallel brushroll, the PencilVac has four tapering rollers (Image credit: Dyson)The cones project out at the sides so they can clean right to the edges of rooms, and the whole thing can lie flat to the ground, with a clearance of just 9.5cm / 3.75 inches off the floor.
I'm interested in Dyson's description of the rollers as 'fluffy', because in the brand's vocabulary that usually indicates a soft roller for use on hard floors only. In fact, the more I look at this vacuum, the more I'm convinced it's a specialist model just for use on hard floor. It's not specified in the press material I have so far, but it would make sense with the lower suction and smaller dust capacity.
3. There's no visible dust cupOne of the most baffling things about the PencilVac is that it doesn't appear to have a dust cup. Of course, there is one – like the motor, it's hidden away inside the handle.
The capacity is next-to-nothing: just 0.08L. However, Dyson has introduced a dust compression system, which uses air to squish down the particles so they take up as little room as possible. Dyson claims that means it can hold five times the physical volume.
The dust cup is also hidden within the handle (Image credit: Dyson)The emptying process has also been reimagined, with a push-lever system replaced by an exciting-sounding "syringe, no-touch bin ejection mechanism".
As it pushes out dust and debris, the mechanism simultaneously wipes the 'shroud'. I'm not totally clear what the 'shroud' is in this context, but I do know that keeping the internal mechanisms clean is key to efficient vacuum performance, so this seems like a good thing.
4. The floorhead glows and appears to floatAs well as siphoning off hair as you clean, the floorhead cones have another trick up their sleeve. The cones rotate in opposite directions, the aim being that this vacuum cleans just as well when it's pushed forward as when it's pulled back. This is a bit of a weak spot on the regular Fluffy floorhead – it has no trouble sucking things up when moving forwards, but pull it back and debris will pool behind it.
I'm intrigued to see how this new approach works in practice – especially because Dyson describes it as "floating" across the floor. I wonder, too, if it might make this vacuum reversible altogether, given the fact that the handle section looks very symmetrical.
(Image credit: Dyson)Dyson has also added "laser-like" illumination to both the front and back of the floorhead. This is another feature borrowed from the exsiting Fluffy floorhead, and helps create big shadows on the tiniest bits of dust, which otherwise might go missed. It only works on hard floors, which is another indication this vac is likely not for carpet.
5. There's a tool that looks like a chimney brushThere's an intriguing addition to the tool lineup in the form of a 'Rotating combi-crevice tool', designed for cleaning in awkward gaps. This seems especially geared towards cleaning high-up, where it can be tricky to get your angles correct. It makes particular sense for an ultra-light vacuum like this one, which is far easier to lift above your head than your average stick vacuum.
As an aside, it looks like the PencilVac is button- rather than trigger-operated. That's dictated by the streamlined shape, but it's also great news for maneuverability and easy of use – the fact that many Dyson vacs still use a trigger to turn on is a perpetual bugbear of mine.
You'll also get a Conical hair screw tool, similar to the one included with the newest Dyson stick vacuums, for tackling long hair on furniture. Both can be stored on the magnetic charging dock.
The Rotating combi-crevice tool looks perfect for cleaning up high (Image credit: Dyson )6. It's app-connectedI'm much less excited about this feature, but it feel like I should point out that this is the first Dyson cordless vacuum to connect to the MyDyson app. The app will provide more information about battery life and also report on filter status. However, there's also a screen on the vacuum itself showing remaining battery, so I'm hoping the app connection is an optional extra rather than an essential.
There's a companion app, but key information is also shown on the vac's screen (Image credit: Dyson)Price & availabilityThe PencilVac will arrive in Australia first, with launch scheduled for August 2025. It's due to go on sale in the UK sometime in 2026, and I'm awaiting info as to if/when it will come to the US. As of yet I don't have any pricing info at all – I'll update this article with more details when I have them.
You might also like...Google has rolled out a new AI-powered shopping feature to help you figure out what the clothes you are interested in buying might look like when you wear them. It's dubbed "try it on" and it's available right now in the US through Google Search Labs.
To get started, you just need to switch it on in the lab. Then, you upload a full-length photo of yourself and start looking for clothes in the Google Shopping tab.
When you click on an image of some outfit from the search results, you'll see a little "try it on" button in the middle of the enlarged version of the outfit in the right-hand panel. One click and about ten seconds later, you'll see yourself wearing the outfit. It may not always be a perfect illusion, but you'll at least get a sense of what it would look like on you.
Google claims the whole thing runs on a model trained to see the relationship between your body and clothing. The AI can, therefore, realistically drape, stretch, and bunch material across a variety of body types.
The feature doesn't work with every piece of clothing you might see, or even every type of outfit. The clothing retailer has to opt into the program, and Google said it only works for shirts, pants, dresses, and skirts.
I did notice that costumes and swimwear both had no usable images, but I could put shorts on myself, and costumes that looked enough like regular clothes were usable. The AI also didn't seem to have an issue with jackets and coats as categories.
Elvis looks(Image credit: Photo/Google AI)For instance, on Google Shopping, I found replicas of the outfits Elvis wore for his 1966 comeback and one of his jumpsuits from the 1970s. With a couple of clicks, I could imagine myself dressed as the King in different eras.
It even changed my shoes in the all-black suit. I'd always wondered if I could pull off either look. The images are shareable, and you can save or send them to others from the Google mobile app and see how much of an Elvis your friends think you are.
Super summer(Image credit: Photo/Google AI)The details that the AI changes to make the photos work are impressive. I used the AI to try on a fun summer look and the closest to a superhero costume I could try. The original photo is me in a suit and jacket with a bowtie and black dress shoes. But the shoes and socks on both AI-generated images not only match what was in the search result, but they're shaped to my stance and size.
Plus, despite wearing long sleeves and pants, the AI found a way to show some of my arms and legs. The color matches reality, but its imperfections are noticeable to me. My legs look too skinny in both, like the AI thinks I skipped leg day, and my legs in the shorts have not been that hairless since I turned 13.
Imperfections aside, it does feel like this will be a major part of the next era of e-commerce. The awkward guessing of whether a color or cut works for your skin tone and build might be easier to resolve.
I wouldn't say it can make up for trying them on in real life, especially when it comes to sizing and comfort, but as a digital version of holding an outfit up against you while you look in a mirror, it's pretty good.
Ending unnecessary returns(Image credit: Photo/Google AI)Uncanny as some of the resulting images are, I think this will be a popular feature for Google Shopping. I'd expect it to be heavily imitated by rivals in AI development and online retail, where it isn't already.
I particularly like how the AI lets you see how you'd look in more outlandish or bold looks you might hesitate to try on at a store. For example, the paisley jacket and striped pants on the left or the swallowtail jacket and waistcoat with Victorian trousers on the right. I'd hesitate to order either look and would almost certainly plan on returning one or both of them even before they arrive.
Returns are a plague on online retailers and waste tons of packaging and other resources. But if Google shows us how we’d look in clothes before we buy them, it could chip away at return rates; retailers will race to sign up for the program.
It could also open the door to more personalized style advice from AI. You could soon have an AI personal dresser, ready to give you a virtual fit check and suggest your next look, even if it isn't something Elvis would have worn.
You might also likeU.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee says he's "outraged" at at the leaders of the UK, France, and Canada for condemning Israel's new military offensive in Gaza. He sat down with NPR to express the U.S. view of the conflict as pressure on Israel from around the world is mounting, not just for the new offensive in Gaza but also for restricting food aid to the territory.
For more coverage of all sides of this conflict, go to npr.org/mideastupdates