Feed aggregator

• AI chatbots and videos use up a huge amount of energy and water
• A five-second AI video uses as much energy as a microwave running for an hour or more
• Data center energy use has doubled since 2017, and AI will account for half ot it by 2028

It only takes a few minutes in a microwave to explode a potato you haven't ventilated, but it takes as much energy as running that microwave for over an hour and more than a dozen potato explosions for an AI model to make a five-second video of a potato explosion.

A new study from MIT Technology Review has laid out just how hungry AI models are for energy. A basic chatbot reply might use as little as 114 or as much as 6,700 joules, between half a second and eight seconds, in a standard microwave, but it's when things get multimodal that the energy costs skyrocket to an hour plus in the microwave, or 3.4 million joules.

It's not a new revelation that AI is energy-intensive, but MIT's work lays out the math in stark terms. The researchers devised what might be a typical session with an AI chatbot, where you ask 15 questions, request 10 AI-generated images, and throw in requests for three different five-second videos.

You can see a realistic fantasy movie scene that appears to be filmed in your backyard a minute after you ask for it, but you won't notice the enormous amount of electricity you've demanded to produce it. You've requested roughly 2.9 kilowatt-hours, or three and a half hours of microwave time.

What makes the AI costs stand out is how painless it feels from the user's perspective. You're not budgeting AI messages like we all did with our text messages 20 years ago.

AI energy rethink

Sure, you're not mining bitcoin, and your video at least has some real-world value, but that's a really low bar to step over when it comes to ethical energy use. The rise in energy demands from data centers is also happening at a ridiculous pace.

Data centers had plateaued in their energy use before the recent AI explosion, thanks to efficiency gains. However, the energy consumed by data centers has doubled since 2017, and around half of it will be for AI by 2028, according to the report.

This isn’t a guilt trip, by the way. I can claim professional demands for some of my AI use, but I've employed it for all kinds of recreational fun and to help with personal tasks, too. I'd write an apology note to the people working at the data centers, but I would need AI to translate it for the language spoken in some of the data center locations. And I don't want to sound heated, or at least not as heated as those same servers get. Some of the largest data centers use millions of gallons of water daily to stay frosty.

The developers behind the AI infrastructure understand what's happening. Some are trying to source cleaner energy options. Microsoft is looking to make a deal with nuclear power plants. AI may or may not be integral to our future, but I'd like it if that future isn’t full of extension cords and boiling rivers.

On an individual level, your use or avoidance of AI won't make much of a difference, but encouraging better energy solutions from the data center owners could. The most optimistic outcome is developing more energy-efficient chips, better cooling systems, and greener energy sources. And maybe AI's carbon footprint should be discussed like any other energy infrastructure, like transportation or food systems. If we’re willing to debate the sustainability of almond milk, surely we can spare a thought for the 3.4 million joules it takes to make a five-second video of a dancing cartoon almond.

As tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude get smarter, faster, and more embedded in our lives, the pressure on energy infrastructure will only grow. If that growth happens without planning, we’ll be left trying to cool a supercomputer with a paper fan while we chew on a raw potato.

You might also like

• Sorry Pixel owners, Google Cloud's new AI video feature will debut on another company's smartphones
• Sora needs to up its game to match the new Runway AI video model
• One of the best AI video generators is now on the iPhone – here's what you need to know about Pika's new app

Remains of the "Scattered Man John Doe" began washing ashore in New Jersey in 1995 and went unidentified for the next three decades. Students at Ramapo College set about to solve the mystery.

(Image credit: Jessica Kourkounis)

Transform your home’s security with these elite smart locks and levers, all tested and curated by our CNET experts.

These battery-powered lawn mowers save energy, run without gas and keep your lawn looking great.

Notepad is getting an AI-generated text feature, and Paint and Snipping Tool are also getting AI upgrades.

Hints and answers for the NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle, No. 243, for May 24.

Here are hints and the answer for today's Wordle No. 1,435 for May 24.

Here are hints and answers for the NYT Strands puzzle No. 447 for May 24.

A series of executive orders aims to promote new kinds of nuclear reactors while restructuring the body in charge of nuclear safety.

(Image credit: Mike Stewart)

The Justice Department says it has reached an agreement in principle with Boeing to drop criminal charges over two fatal crashes of 737 Max jets, despite objections from some victims' family members.

(Image credit: Shelby Tauber)

• Crucial’s X10 SSD fits 8TB in a drive barely larger than your credit card
• Read speeds hit 2,100 MB/s, but only under ideal conditions few users will replicate
• Crucial T710 boasts Gen5 speeds up to 14,900 MB/s - on paper, at least

Large-capacity SSDs packed into compact designs continue to attract attention, as users look for storage solutions that combine portability, performance, and enough space to handle growing digital demands.

At Computex 2025, Crucial’s parent company Micron unveiled two new portable SSDs: the Crucial X10 and the Crucial T710 PCIe Gen5 NVMe SSD.

The Crucial X10 is part of the company’s push into high-capacity portable drives, offering 4TB, 6TB, and 8TB of storage, even though the device is barely larger than a stack of credit cards.

Crucial adds high-capacity storage options

It claims read speeds of up to 2,100MB/s, similar to the older but larger Crucial X10 Pro. It uses the SM2322 controller, has an IP65 dust and water resistance rating, and is drop-tested to nearly 10 feet.

According to Crucial, the X10 can store up to 500,000 4K photos, more than 100 large video games, or over 2 million MP3 files - although these numbers depend heavily on file types and compression.

Still, an 8TB drive this small is uncommon and will likely appeal to anyone tired of juggling multiple smaller SSDs or external HDDs.

“Our X10 portable drive is a powerhouse, effortlessly handling massive backups, games and photo libraries - no matter where life takes you or what it throws your way. These innovations from Crucial underscore our relentless effort to exceed our customers’ storage needs,” said Dinesh Bahal, corporate vice president and general manager of Micron’s Commercial Products Group.

Meanwhile, the internal Crucial T710 targets the performance segment with PCIe Gen5 support and speeds reaching 14,900MB/s read and 13,800MB/s write.

It uses Micron’s G9 NAND and Silicon Motion’s SM2508 controller and is clearly designed with AI workloads and high-end gaming in mind.

Random IOPS figures reach 2.2 million for reads and 2.3 million for writes, though, as Crucial notes, these results were achieved under ideal conditions using CrystalDiskMark with write cache enabled and Windows features disabled to reduce system overhead. Real-world performance will vary.

Crucial claims the T710 offers up to 67% more IOPS per watt than previous models and can load large language models like Llama 2 into memory in under a second.

The T710 will be available in capacities up to 4TB and will include an optional heatsink for systems with limited thermal headroom. The Crucial X10 is available now, while the T710 is expected to ship in July 2025.

You might also like

• These are the best NAS devices around
• We've also rounded up the best cloud storage platforms on offer
• Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says it's time to get on board with AI, or be left behind

• Radeon AI Pro R9700 targets local AI workloads and multi-GPU setups
• The new workstation-class GPU shares its name with a 20 year old ATI card
• New GPU features 128 AI accelerators and 32GB GDDR6 RAM

At Computex 2025, AMD announced the Radeon AI Pro R9700, a workstation GPU aimed at local AI tasks and multi-GPU compute environments.

For those familiar with the history of graphics cards, the name might ring a bell. Over 20 years ago, the original Radeon 9700 Pro marked a turning point for ATI. It was one of the first GPUs to beat Nvidia convincingly in both performance and delivery, and its launch back in 2002 helped shift market dynamics.

Fast forward to today, and AMD, which acquired ATI for $5.4 billion in 2006, is reusing the 9700 name for a very different card. The AI Pro R9700 is not for gamers, but for developers and professionals working with large-scale AI models.

Tuned for AI

The Radeon AI Pro R9700 features 128 dedicated AI accelerators, 32GB of GDDR6 memory, and a PCIe Gen 5 interface. Power draw is rated at 300W.

AMD says it can hit 96 teraflops of FP16 performance and deliver 1531 TOPS for AI inference.

Unlike GPUs built for rendering or gaming, this one is tuned for local inference and training. AMD claims it can run models with up to 32 billion parameters without cloud offload.

In a system with four cards, that scales up to 123 billion. The AI Pro R9700 is optimized for multi-GPU configurations and workloads like LLM training, simulation, and AI-accelerated rendering.

It ships with ROCm support on Linux, with Windows support expected later. Availability is set for July 2025.

While the AI Pro R9700 was AMD’s headline release for professional AI workloads at Computex, the Ryzen Threadripper 9000 Series and RX 9060 XT GPU rounded out the line-up with options aimed at creators, enthusiasts, and gamers.

You may also like

• AMD kills quad core server CPU from its server line-up
• AMD launches puzzling new graphics card that will absolutely not appeal to gamers
• AMD set to launch new Radeon Pro W9000 workstation GPU

Throughout the more than three years since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, drones have been a key tool and weapon used by both sides in the conflict. Because of this, Ukraine is at the cutting edge of drone innovation, churning out some two million unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs, last year. These flying drones come in all sizes and they're produced in factories large and high-tech, as well as small and shoestring. In today's episode, NPR's Eleanor Beardsley takes us inside a drone-making operation in Kyiv.

• AMD has received quite a lot of flak for making an 8GB version of the RX 9060 XT
• A Team Red exec has argued that this VRAM loadout is fine for 1080p
• Some gamers remain unconvinced and also feel AMD has badly named this new pair of 8GB and 16GB GPUs

AMD has shot back at critics after coming under fire for producing a version of its newly revealed RX 9060 XT graphics card that has an 8GB loadout of video RAM (VRAM).

The RX 9060 XT was revealed earlier this week in both 16GB and 8GB versions. The latter is causing anger, as some argue it is not enough for modern PC gaming, and there are other worries here, too.

Michael Quesada, who runs a Spanish YouTube channel on the topic of PC gaming, aired an indignant post on X asking why AMD (and Nvidia) keep making GPUs with 8GB of VRAM, questioning how that’s justified in 2025.

VideoCardz noticed that Frank Azor, AMD’s head of consumer and gaming marketing, was drawn to reply, as you can see below.

Majority of gamers are still playing at 1080p and have no use for more than 8GB of memory. Most played games WW are mostly esports games. We wouldn't build it if there wasn't a market for it. If 8GB isn't right for you then there's 16GB. Same GPU, no compromise, just memory…May 22, 2025

Azor observes that most gamers are still running at 1080p resolution and, therefore, don’t need more than 8GB of VRAM. The AMD exec notes that the most popular games are esports titles, which are less demanding, and that Team Red wouldn’t make an 8GB graphics card if there wasn’t a demand for it.

Azor concludes: “If 8GB isn’t right for you then there’s 16GB. Same GPU, no compromise, just memory options.”

(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)Analysis: No compromise, but plenty of cynicism

To be fair to Azor, there’s some truth to what the executive says here. Certainly, for a more casual level of gaming, as well as esports titles that are built for fluid frame rates in general, as that’s more important than graphical bells and whistles to competitive players, 8GB is likely enough.

As others point out, it’s not enough for all PC games, even at 1080p resolution. Although tweaking graphics details suitably and making some compromises, you can generally get by, albeit there are notable exceptions even at 1080p.

But despite the noise made by the ‘8GB just isn’t enough these days’ camp on social media – and it is a fair old racket, make no mistake – some of the negative feeling here is more about deceptive naming.

Rather than having the RX 9060 XT 8GB and RX 9060 XT 16GB, there should have been a clear naming delineation between these two variants. The most prevalent suggestion is that AMD should’ve called the 8GB spin the plain old RX 9060, dropping the XT suffix.

Why is making that naming distinction important? Because what can happen with both graphics cards being called the ‘RX 9060 XT’ is that system builders simply list that as the GPU in any given PC, with no accompanying memory details. Less informed consumers may not even be aware that there are two different variants of the RX 9060 XT.

They may have perused opinions or reviews of the 16GB flavor and assume that’s what they are getting in their shiny new PC, when in fact it has the somewhat inferior 8GB GPU.

PC builders may deliberately not make that clear, because the system is cheaper to produce with the RX 9060 XT 8GB, but they won’t drop the price to consider that. In other words, this is a knowledge trap for the unwary and a way for system makers to take advantage of them. And it’s an avenue AMD could have shut off with different names for the 8GB and 16GB cards.

AMD might argue that it intends to have an RX 9060 vanilla GPU in the future, so it couldn’t use that name, but surely it could’ve found some suitable way of denoting the difference. Such as calling the 16GB version the 9060 XTX (although that’s a suffix reserved for the flagship GPU, you get the idea).

There’s a level of unhappiness and cynicism around the naming here, in short, and we should note this applies to Nvidia as well as AMD (with Team Green’s xx60 Ti models that have both 8GB and 16GB versions in the same vein).

AMD does get some credit here for ensuring it hasn’t further hamstrung the RX 9060 XT for some gamers with older motherboards by halving the number of supported PCIe lanes. Still, I won’t go into that here, as it’s getting sidetracked really (and it’s something I’ve discussed elsewhere).

(Image credit: Getty Images / luza studios)

To summarize: 8GB should be okay for a lot of games at 1080p resolution, with some down-tuning of graphics details as appropriate – but it won’t work well for everything, and the level of future-proofing feels wonky indeed.

On top of that, be careful of prebuilt PCs that list an RX 9060 XT graphics card with no accompanying spec info – it’s almost certainly going to be the 8GB version, and you may be paying more for it than you should.

For those buying a standalone RX 9060 XT, it makes sense to pay the premium for the 16GB version. It’s worth doing so for future-proofing alone, and it promises to be an excellent graphics card for the money overall.

That said, this assumes the premium is roughly 15% extra as per the MRSPs and that demand for the 9060 XT 16GB doesn’t considerably inflate the price. If it does, then that muddles the value equation a lot more. Hopefully, stock won’t be a problem, though, if the rumors are right. It’s only if supply is thin that jacked-up prices start to rear their ugly heads.

If another rumor is correct, the 16GB board will be the RX 9060 XT model predominantly stocked at retailers, so that’ll be the one you mostly see if you’re on the hunt for an AMD GPU, anyway.

Although that also brings the suggestion that the 8GB flavor is being kept more to PC builders, which could fan the aforementioned flames of cynicism around this whole affair – assuming this is anything more than empty chatter.

You might also like

• I tested the RTX 5060 - is 8GB of VRAM really enough in 2025?
• AMD Radeon RX 9070 review: a great choice if the RX 9070 XT and RTX 5070 are out of reach
• Microsoft is digging its own grave with Windows 11, and it has to stop

DOGE's push to cut some federal surveys conducted by the Census Bureau may be duplicating a White House agency's oversight work and weaken U.S. data infrastructure, experts warn.

(Image credit: Etienne Laurent)

• Valve's SteamOS 3.7 stable has official support for the Lenovo Legion Go S
• It also features limited support for other AMD-powered handhelds
• It's promised future support for other devices

Microsoft's Windows 11 has been present on most handheld gaming PCs, notably the Asus ROG Ally and the Lenovo Legion Go. However, that may be on the verge of changing, with Valve's Linux operating system first making its way to a new handheld.

As reported by VideoCardz, Valve's SteamOS 3.7 stable has been released with full Lenovo Legion Go S support, along with other AMD-powered handheld gaming PCs. While solutions like preview drivers or beta builds have been available, this is the first time Valve has provided gamers with installation instructions (specifically for the Lenovo Legion Go and Asus ROG Ally).

Compatibility includes other AMD-powered handheld gaming PCs, but it's important to note that Valve has stated that only the Legion Go S (and, of course, the Steam Deck) will have official SteamOS support. However, it highlights that it's continually working on improved support for other handhelds.

Fortunately, gamers still have other options such as Bazzite, which is essentially a SteamOS clone with additional features like Handheld Daemon for greater handheld functionality; most importantly, it arguably has more support through updates for desktop PCs, laptops, and handhelds.

It could be a while before we see SteamOS at its full capacity on non-Steam Deck devices, so Bazzite, ChimeraOS, and other SteamOS or Linux distros ideal for handheld gaming are certainly ones to look towards in the meantime.

(Image credit: Future)Another reason for Microsoft to step it up for handhelds with Windows 11...

Besides the issues with anti-cheat games not running on Linux (specifically SteamOS), running Microsoft's Windows 11 on handheld gaming PCs has few benefits.

Even with tools like Armoury Crate on the Asus ROG Ally, Microsoft has yet to acknowledge and support portable devices. Further, with the run of game-breaking bugs from Windows 11 24H2, I was convinced to install Bazzite.

I must say, I'm glad I did, as the SteamOS user experience for handhelds is significantly better than Windows 11. It helped me further appreciate the sleep function on the Steam Deck, which is a pain to deal with on Windows, as games can crash completely upon waking up your device. It's not an issue now since it's possible with other handhelds using SteamOS via distros or Valve's SteamOS distribution.

There are plenty of reasons why Microsoft should step it up with better Windows 11 features for handhelds, but now is the best time to act. Once devices other than the Legion Go S and Steam Deck have greater SteamOS support, I suspect even more PC gamers will turn away from the popular operating system...

You may also like

• With 5 months to go, many UK businesses are grappling with the Windows 10 end-of-life deadline
• Windows 11 is getting more AI shortcuts, but is Microsoft in danger of cluttering up the OS with AI creep?
• Microsoft shows us discarded Windows 11 Start menu designs – and I’m so glad they were chucked in the bin in favor of the revamp we’re getting

• Bosgame M5 mini-PC features an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor
• Integrated Radeon 8060S Graphics, up to 128GB of RAM, dual PCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSDs
• There's also a performance switch, but what it actually does is a mystery for now

A new mini PC featuring AMD’s high-end Ryzen AI Max+ 395 chip has surfaced, but this one didn’t come from a major brand like HP, Dell, or Lenovo.

The Bosgame M5 AI Mini Desktop has quietly gone up for pre-order, priced at $1,699 (a saving of $1,000 off its usual MSRP of $2,700), and it's raising some interesting questions about AMD’s rollout strategy for its powerful Strix Halo processor line.

The compact M5 comes with integrated Radeon 8060S Graphics and includes support for up to 128GB of RAM, dual PCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD slots, a USB 4.0 front port, Wi-Fi 6E, and Bluetooth 5.4. A dual-fan cooling setup and three heat pipes aim to keep thermal performance under control.

Performance switch

As Notebookcheck observes, the M5 has already appeared in Geekbench results. The listing shows a single-core score of 2,852, which is in line with expectations, but a lower-than-average multicore score of 16,044. This likely points to early firmware or software issues, as the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 typically averages around 21,000 in multicore tests.

One curious detail about the M5 is the inclusion of a "performance switch" button, shown briefly in Bosgame's promotional material. It’s unclear what this toggle actually does. It might be linked to TDP profiles, fan curves, or some kind of AI workload optimization, but for now we have no idea.

The Bosgame M5 AI Mini Desktop includes dual USB4 Type-C ports, multiple USB 3.2 and USB 2.0 ports, full-sized HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4 outputs for multi-monitor setups, and a 2.5Gbps RJ45 LAN port for stable wired networking.

A full-size SDXC card slot offers convenient media transfer for photographers and videographers, while dual audio jacks ensure flexible sound input and output.

You may also like

• Check out our list of the best mobile workstations for any budget
• And these are the best mini PCs you can buy right now
• Minisforum's NAS packs a Ryzen AI HX 370, up to 96GB RAM and 154TB storage

A win in Naples for Gli Azzurri will see it seal the title.

Standing desks have become increasingly popular over the last several years, especially as working from home grows. The quality and features have grown along with that popularity. Some of the desks I am testing right now are well into $3,000, and that's not even fully featured or the most expensive that specific desk can get.

The point is that the best standing desks are getting larger in terms of size, feature sets, and price. For those who have one of those and want another workspace, or those who wish to have just a simple, bare-bones workspace that isn't their kitchen table, counter, or slumped over on their couch, the TribeSign Mobile Height Adjustable Desk may be an excellent option for you.

It's designed to be a cart you can roll in front of a couch, for example, to provide a workspace to place your laptop and get some work done without staring down at your lap. It's great for that, but I have actually found use for this desk as a heavily used workspace where I have been able to get some serious work done.

I won't say that this desk compares to some of the premium standing desks, because it doesn't. But what it does well is the bare-bones basics, for a very low cost. With that in mind, and the caveat of budget pricing, I'll give this desk a 4/5. But let me explain further...

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)Tribesigns Mobile Height Adjustable Desk: Pricing and Availability

The TribeSign Mobile Height Adjustable Desk retails at around $129.99 through the company's website by clicking here and a few other retailers like Amazon.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)Tribesigns Mobile Height Adjustable Desk: Unboxing & first impressions

The desk came in compact packaging with the basic tools and components needed. I built this desk in 16 minutes from start to finish, and it was incredibly easy to do.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Once I got this desk together, I could see how simple and lightweight it was. It's minimalistic and has simple controls to raise and lower the desk, albeit manually. It is not easy to do if you have things on the desk weighing it down, but regardless, it has the ability.

I also noticed the simple grommet power solution, and immediately noted how it could be used with an upgraded grommet, if desired or needed.

Tribesigns Mobile Height Adjustable Desk: Design & Build QualitySpecs

Dimensions: 35.4" W x 17.7" D x 27.6"–43.3" H
Materials: 0.6" thick particleboard with a metal frame
Features: Wireless charging grommet, USB ports, sliding keyboard tray, lockable wheels

The TribeSign Mobile Height Adjustable Desk is compact and made for small or multi-use spaces. The materials are budget-grade, though the desk is solid for the price point. The keyboard and mouse sliding tray works well and is easy enough to use. It's pretty shallow, but I can fit a standard Logitech MX Keys and a Logitech MX Anywhere mouse.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)Tribesigns Mobile Height Adjustable Desk: In use

As I mentioned, this desk is designed to roll out in a living room scenario and be a temporary or simple workstation. However, without intending it, this desk has become a heavily used workstation for me in the last month. I set this up upstairs in my house to try it out when my basement office overruns guests.

Since then, I have found myself needing to use this desk quite a bit, so much so that I have added a 32" Dell monitor I am testing (review coming soon), a Logitech MX Keys, Logitech MX Anywhere, a Grovemade iPad Stand I love using with my MacBook, and even a BenQ Laptop Light Bar that I have behind the monitor to bouce light off the wall at night.

I use the monitor as a hub to charge my lightbar, iPhone/iPad if needed, and, of course, my MacBook Pro while plugged in. Occasionally, I will charge my AirPods on the wireless charger, but I'm more tempted to upgrade this grommet with a nicer one that gives me better output.

This desk works even with this setup, as you can see in the pictures. It feels like it shouldn't, but it has been working for months. It's simple. It's minimal, not expensive, nor bougie, but it works. And, sometimes, that's all you need.

I still greatly prefer my fancy desks, which I get to build and use daily. Those are still my primary workstations and the ones I like. But if you are short on space and only have a little room to fit in a workstation, this one is shockingly impressive.

I'll admit, I have yet to mess with the height settings manually I have this desk on right now, but setting the height in the first place has given me a great height to use a mouse and keyboard with the tray and see my monitor at the height I want.
All around, as a secondary desk space, smaller desk space, or even this makeshift minimalist desk, the TribeSigns Mobile Height Adjustable Desk has surprised me.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Design

Minimal, compact

⭐⭐⭐⭐

Ease of use

Easy to use

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Practicality

Right for small spaces

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Price

Cheap Price, Cheap material

⭐⭐⭐⭐

Tribesigns Mobile Height Adjustable Desk: Final verdict

TribeSigns Mobile Height Adjustable Desk is a budget-friendly and versatile option for anyone looking for a space-saving workstation. Though it won't replace a full desk for intensive use, its mobility and built-in features make it a great addition to any home or office environment.

It's win or bust for Simone Inzaghi's men in the last game of the Italian season.