Feed aggregator

Nintendo has done it again with a great new way to play games on its just-launched console.

Behind your ChatGPT and Gemini queries, there's a land grab happening to keep up the fevered pace of gen AI's growth. The consequences are significant.

School often brings lots of illness, but these experts share tricks to keep your family healthy.

The TCL 60 XE NxtPaper 5G has a big, beautiful screen and enough juice to get through the day -- but its e-reader mode and AI features are the real standouts.

I think it’s fair to say that when April’s hotly anticipated Nintendo Direct swung around, Drag x Drive wasn’t on anyone's bingo card. Yes, one of the initial first-party releases on the Nintendo Switch 2 isn’t only a sports title – but one that’s based on wheelchair basketball.

Review info

Platform reviewed: Nintendo Switch 2
Available on: Nintendo Switch 2 only
Release date: August 14, 2025

Drag x Drive is, at its core, a game intended to show off the enhanced capabilities of the Joy-Con 2. In particular, their mouse controls are used to move your player around the court. It’s also massively centered around online play, almost positioning it as Nintendo’s rival to the hugely successful Rocket League.

So, a couple of major questions arise. Is Drag x Drive just a glorified tech demo? Or is it a fully-fledged Nintendo Switch 2 sports title with enough depth to hold down a loyal playerbase? I spent hours playing this unorthodox new release to find out.

A real workout

(Image credit: Nintendo)

From the moment you open Drag x Drive, you’re thrown into a tutorial that teaches you all the basics of movement, hooping, and tricking. You can place the Joy-Con 2 controllers on a flat surface or even on your legs, and use mouse controls to mimic pushing wheels on a wheelchair.

The controls are intuitive and fairly easy to get to grips with, in my view. HD rumble also makes every turn and push feel a bit more true-to-life. There’s been some debate online about the best way to control your baller, but I found that holding the Joy-Con 2’s on top of my legs was the most comfortable, natural-feeling method.

However, after a few minutes of wheeling around as well as a couple of practice matches, I identified – well, felt, really – one of Drag x Drive’s key limitations. My arms were feeling beat.

Yep, this game’s a real workout, though I did wonder if this was intentional. Is Drag x Drive meant to immerse the player in the high-exertion reality of wheelchair basketball? Maybe. But the facts are, I felt pretty achey after a few back-to-back matches, which did make playing for longer than around 30 minutes feel tiring.

Aside from that, though, movement is solid. You can easily build up speed with long, relaxed strokes, and wheel up on-court halfpipes to dunk or obstruct a shot. The ZL and ZR buttons enable you to brake, and you can also use them to bunny hop, giving you some extra elevation when blocking or shooting.

On the topic of shooting, it’s also quite consistent. The more lined up you are with the basket, the more likely you are to score, which can be performed with a flick of the wrist – no buttons needed. I did find, on occasion, my baller would raise their hand to shoot, even when I hadn’t performed this motion. But most of the time, shooting is responsive.

Best bit

(Image credit: Nintendo)

I wheeled up the court’s half-pipe, flung myself into the air, and hit a gnarly dunk to help my team declare victory in the final seconds of a match.

I’d argue that the most underwhelming element of Drag x Drive’s core gameplay, however, is defending. In order to steal the ball, you must charge into an opposing player while facing them. But, when playing matches online during the game’s Global Jam trial event, I found that this didn’t always work – I’d clash into an opponent, but the ball would remain firmly in their grip.

On top of that, blocking didn’t feel very reliable. Ultimately, my games were rarely won by good defense. They were typically won by aggressively attacking. Speaking of, you can bag extra points with trick shots – think dunks and mid-air throws. And I have to say, winning a match with a mid-air 3-pointer is very satisfying!

Oh, and one final note on gameplay – I often found myself in 2v2 matches when playing online via Global Jam. Scrolling on Reddit, I discovered that other players encountered a similar occurrence, though games were still generally balanced, and I barely ever experienced any delays or performance issues.

I’m hoping 2v2s are a little less common when the full game is on general release, though, for the most action-packed experience possible.

Where’s the Nintendo magic?

(Image credit: Nintendo)

Let’s take a break from gameplay to chat about design. Now, I'm gonna be frank. I am not a fan of the way Drag x Drive looks. The world – or should I say, the courts – is too bland. Colors aren’t very vibrant, and there’s a generally dingy look to the environment, which is a real shame.

Given this is a Nintendo-developed title, you expect the vivid, character-filled presentation that so many of the best Nintendo Switch 2 games – and indeed, the best Nintendo Switch games – thrive off of. In addition, character models lack polish, meaning the game doesn’t really look like it was made for a flashy new console.

Not only is it visually underwhelming, but the overall Drag x Drive experience is pretty thin – perhaps to be expected given its low price tag. 3v3 online matches are generally competitive and entertaining to hop into, though, as I mentioned, a few games left my arms feeling lethargic. And other than those online matches, there’s not all too much to do.

There are a few minigames littered around the courts – stuff like cone courses and sprint time trials. If you complete these within a certain amount of time, you can earn a trophy. But after I did this, I didn’t feel particularly keen to return to them. Variety could be better, too, given that many of the minigames are variations of each other – there are a number of cone courses to finish, for instance.

(Image credit: Nintendo)

Something that’s undoubtedly positive, though, is that the trophies you obtain by clearing minigames help you unlock new customization options. For example, you can get new helmets – including one with a mohawk, which I took a liking to. Other than that, you can alter the texture and colors of your armor, frame, and wheels.

Combine this with the opportunity to switch between a speedy yet lightweight guard, a bulky yet slow center, or an all-rounder forward, and Drag x Drive ends up being a pleasingly personalizable time.

So, how about we go back to that question of ours: is Drag x Drive just a glorified tech demo? Well, that might be a touch harsh. But the finished product does feel a little underbaked. The core experience – the 3v3 online matches – is decently tense and end-to-end, and I can see myself dipping in from time to time for a quick game.

But a quick game is all I would really want from Drag x Drive. It’s a workout on the arms, minigames aren’t massively engaging, and the environment isn’t visually stimulating enough to draw me in for the long run.

Much like it did with Arms on the original Switch, Nintendo took a long shot early with Drag x Drive. And honestly, I appreciate the decision to create an original gaming experience based on wheelchair basketball – it’s refreshing to see more representation of sports such as this. But in the end, its tiring controls and unappealing aesthetic hold Drag x Drive back from being a total slam dunk.

Should you play Drag x Drive?

(Image credit: Nintendo)Play it if...

You want an online game you can quickly dip in and out of
Drag x Drive is solid fun if you’re willing to just hop on for a couple of games. You can take on friends or global competitors for a few minutes without feeling fatigued, and just enjoy flexing your 3-point shooting or dunking skills.

You want to get the best out of mouse mode
One of the key missions of Drag x Drive is to showcase the smooth, intuitive nature of the Joy Con 2’s mouse controls. And that’s a mission that it accomplishes – controls are largely responsive, and it will be interesting to see how Nintendo makes use of them in future titles.

Don't play it if...

You’re looking to chill, rather than work out
If you’re hoping to relax after a long day at work or school, maybe even a gym session, say, Drag x Drive might not be what you're looking for. Wheeling around gets pretty tiring after a while, so extended play sessions can feel like quite the workout.

You want to experience the peak powers of the Switch 2
I’d argue that the most disappointing aspect of Drag x Drive is its visual presentation. Colors don’t pop, environments lack polish, and the graphics just generally fail to highlight the power of the Nintendo Switch 2. Want a beautiful title for your shiny new console? Maybe look elsewhere – my recommendation would be the absolutely smashing Donkey Kong Bananza.

Accessibility features

There aren’t all too many accessibility features to note from Drag x Drive. You can adjust the camera distance as well as the X and Y-axis configuration, and choose whether to use mouse or stick controls for menu navigation. But, disappointingly, that’s about it.

How I reviewed Drag x Drive

(Image credit: Nintendo)

I played Drag x Drive for around 10 hours, mainly competing online during the Global Jam event and in matches against bots in single-player mode. I also completed the majority of the available minigames and played around with the customization options available.

For the most part, I played the game in docked mode on my Nintendo Switch 2, which is hooked up to the Sky Glass Gen 2 and a Samsung HW-Q800D soundbar. However, I did also spend some time playing the game in tabletop mode while connected to my Sony WH-1000XM6 headphones.

First reviewed August 2025

• Anthropic is offering Claude to all branches of US Government for next to nothing
• Move comes after OpenAI offered a very similar deal for ChatGPT
• AI companies are rushing to get their models adopted across the board

Anthropic has offered its Claude AI model to US government agencies for just $1 for the next year.

The offer extends to all three branches of the government, targeting the legislative and judicial branches alongside the executive.

The move comes almost immediately after OpenAI offered its ChatGPT enterprise for all US federal government workers for $1 per year per agency, as the firms look to undercut each other - and presumably create a reliance within the public sector, which is likely to use AI tools to help streamline their work and save money on admin costs.

Government contracts

“As AI adoption leads to transformation across industries, we want to ensure that federal workers can fully harness these capabilities to better serve the American people. By removing cost barriers, we're enabling the government to access the same advanced AI that's already proving its value in the private sector,” Anthropic said in a statement.

LLM companies are racing to obtain government contracts, with Anthropic, OpenAI, and xAI awarded a $200 million AI development deal with the US Department of Defence - all to develop models for US government customers for national security.

Claude has already been added to the General Services Administration’s (GSA) schedule to help streamline procurement, with Claude for Enterprise and Claude for Government offering support with handling sensitive unclassified work.

The firm will also give assistance to rapidly implement AI across agencies - with technical support for successful adoption into their ‘productivity and mission workflows’.

“This OneGov deal with Anthropic is proof that the United States is setting the standard for how governments adopt AI — boldly, responsibly, and at scale,” said GSA Acting Administrator Michael Rigas.

“This agreement puts the most advanced American AI models directly into the hands of those serving the American people.”

You might also like

• Take a look at our picks for the AI tools around
• Check out our choice for best AI writer to help you out
• 70% of people are sick of talking to AI – where did all the humans go?

Trump’s tax and spending law makes the largest cut in history to one of the nation’s biggest safety net programs. Today on the show, we explore how cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as SNAP, impacts families and grocery stores alike. 

Based on the digital story: Independent grocery stores have had a tough five years. SNAP cuts will make it harder

Related episodes:
Do work requirements help SNAP people out of government aid?
When SNAP Gets Squeezed
The trouble with water discounts

For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.

Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.

(Image credit: Stephan Bisaha)

The White House lowered its expectations surrounding the Trump-Putin summit on Friday. And, advocates worry about penalties for homeless people in D.C. during the crackdown on crime.

(Image credit: Mikhail Klimentyev/Sputnik/AFP)

From dorm life to classrooms, these smart home products bring fun, efficiency and safety to your school activities.

• Paid ChatGPT users are getting access to a bunch of older models
• Altman teases an upgrade to ChatGPT-5’s personality is coming
• The new “warmer” upgrade is to counter the backlash to GPT-5

In his latest tweet on the social media platform X, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, has confirmed that all paid ChatGPT subscribers will be getting access to not only the old GPT-4o model, but also older LLMs like o3, 4.1.

The popular ChatGPT-4.5 will also be coming back, but it will only be available to Pro subscribers. Altman says this is because “it costs a lot of GPUs”, a reference to the amount of compute power that it requires.

In the wake of the backlash against the removal of the popular 4o model with absolutely no warning when GPT-5 was released, Altman seems to have learned a lesson and has promised, “If we ever do deprecate it, we will give plenty of notice.”

All paid users of ChatGPT should now find a 'Show additional models' toggle in the ChatGPT web settings, which will give you access to all the older LLM models. You’ll also be able to add a new GPT-5 Thinking mini model.

Updates to ChatGPT:You can now choose between “Auto”, “Fast”, and “Thinking” for GPT-5. Most users will want Auto, but the additional control will be useful for some people.Rate limits are now 3,000 messages/week with GPT-5 Thinking, and then extra capacity on GPT-5 Thinking…August 13, 2025

Altman also makes reference to the highly criticized ‘colder’ tone of the new ChatGPT-5, which has alienated many users in the tweet: “We are working on an update to GPT-5’s personality which should feel warmer than the current personality, but not as annoying (to most users) as GPT-4o”.

His reference to ChatGPT-4o being annoying refers to the sycophantic phase that GPT-4o seemed to enter after an upgrade back in April.

Altman continues, ”However, one learning for us from the past few days is we really just need to get to a world with more per-user customization of model personality.”

Multiple personalities

Altman’s reference to “per-user customization” reflects OpenAI's recognition that what its users want is an easier way to select how formal, humorous, empathetic, or direct the assistant is.

Altman endured a recent AMA chat on Reddit where he got to listen to users' complaints firsthand. It seems to be GPT-5's lack of a personality that has most angered ChatGPT users, who had gotten used to building quite a rapport with GPT-4o.

If I were given free rein to imagine how I'd like ChatGPT to work, I’d like to get to the stage where ChatGPT's personality traits could be represented via sliders, like ‘professional vs. casual’ or ‘concise vs. detailed’. That would make it far easier to get the results you are looking for.

While CustomGPTs already exist, I’d love it if it were possible to easily switch between personality types, like ‘Work Assistant’ or ‘Creative Writing Coach’. However, I get the feeling it will be a long time yet before we get such an easily customizable AI chatbot to talk to.

You might also like

• Has ChatGPT-5's cold tone made you want to try alternative AIs? Claude just added a new memory feature
• Yes, Sam Altman will be played by Andrew Garfield in 'Artificial', but all we want to know is who’s playing Elon Musk
• ChatGPT users are still fuming about GPT-5’s downgrades – here are the 4 biggest complaints

Former U.S. Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn says President Trump's crackdown in Washington, D.C. could tarnish police relationships in the city.

(Image credit: Jacquelyn Martin)

• GPT-5 now has multiple thinking modes to choose from
• Sam Altman has also confirmed an increase in rate limits for ChatGPT Plus subscribers
• GPT-5 launched less than a week ago to widespread criticism

GPT-5 just got its first major change, and now users can select between different modes when using the new model in ChatGPT.

Confirmed by OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman, on X earlier today, ChatGPT users can now choose between Auto, Fast, Thinking, and Thinking-mini when using GPT-5.

Each new mode offers a different way for GPT-5 to, you guessed it, think. "Auto" lets GPT-5 decide for itself how long to think, Fast" gives you instant answers, "Thinking-mini" thinks quickly, and "Thinking" will take longer to think for better answers.

The change comes following mass backlash related to GPT-5's performance, and will now give users multiple tiers of performance to choose from. We've yet to test all of the new thinking modes; however, when OpenAI decided to limit choice and remove legacy models, the lack of variety was met with widespread criticism.

OpenAI has since reverted back on those decisions, making 4o available again for paid subscribers, and adding the choice of multiple thinking abilities in GPT-5 only further cements the U-turn.

Updates to ChatGPT:You can now choose between “Auto”, “Fast”, and “Thinking” for GPT-5. Most users will want Auto, but the additional control will be useful for some people.Rate limits are now 3,000 messages/week with GPT-5 Thinking, and then extra capacity on GPT-5 Thinking…August 13, 2025

3000 messages a week? Yes please

New thinking modes aren't the only changes coming to GPT-5. Altman also announced the increase in rate limits for the brand new AI model following discontent from ChatGPT Plus users who pay $20/£20 a month to access the premium tier.

At launch, GPT-5's Thinking model was limited to 200 messages per week for Plus subscribers, now Altman says the rate limits have been increased to 3,000 a week. He also notes, "Context limit for GPT-5 Thinking is 196k tokens. We may have to update rate limits over time depending on usage."

Earlier this week, Altman said ChatGPT-5 Pro might be coming to Plus subscribers too, although he now appears to have backtracked, claiming, "we do not have the compute to do it right now."

GPT-5 hasn't even been out a week yet, but OpenAI has started to right the wrongs of the initial launch. With new rate limits and more choices in how long the AI model takes to respond with less or more thinking process, the company is trying to recapture its user base's trust.

You might also like

• GPT-5 free tier – 3 cool features you can try now for nothing
• GPT-5 is here – 5 things you need to know about OpenAI’s ‘most useful’ model yet
• Yes, Sam Altman will be played by Andrew Garfield in 'Artificial', but all we want to know is who’s playing Elon Musk

• OpenAI announces support for even more third-party integration and cloud storage platforms
• However it means millions won't be able to use connectors
• GPT-5 sees some tweaks, and legacy models make a return

OpenAI has rolled out some handy new updates to Pro subscribers that will see ChatGPT link in more closely with top productivity tools such as Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Contacts and GitHub to reference content without the services inside conversations.

Plus members also get a few connectors, too, including collaboration tools such as Microsoft Teams and SharePoint, along with the likes of Box, Canva, Dropbox, HubSpot and Notion.

As has often proven to be the case with ChatGPT, other paying tiers including Plus, Team, Enterprise and Edu will also get the Pro features in the coming weeks via a staged rollout.

ChatGPT connects to even more workplace apps

We've already seen connectors link to some third-party services for easier, faster access to information, including Google Drive, but the latest update marks a considerable improvement with links to even more platforms.

However, there's one key twist that means millions of users will not be able to use them – OpenAI explained, "connectors for Plus/Pro plans are not available in EEA, Switzerland, and the UK." TechRadar Pro has sought confirmation as to why this is the case.

The news comes as OpenAI releases its GPT-5 and GPT-5 Thinking models to the world, with the company announcing the availability for business plans now.

Users can now select between 'Auto', 'Fast' and 'Thinking' variants of GPT-5 based on how much control they may require, with Plus users being granted 3,000 messages per week with GPT-5 Thinking before OpenAI directs them to the lighter GPT-5 Thinking mini model.

4o has also returned into the model picker following uproar that all previous models got removed upon the launch of GPT-5.

"Paid users also now have a 'Show additional models' toggle in ChatGPT web settings which will add models like o3, o4-mini, 4.1, and GPT-5 Thinking mini," OpenAI explained in a support page. "4.5 is only available to Pro users due to GPUs."

You might also like

• Sam Altman confirms ChatGPT Plus subscribers will have increased rate limit amid continued GPT-5 backlash
• We've listed the best AI tools and best AI writers
• Check out the best cloud storage options around today

• Millions play games on LinkedIn regularly, apparently
• Sudoku is the sixth game to be added to LinkedIn's gaming platform
• LinkedIn believes Sudoku games can be an ice-breaker

LinkedIn has added another game to its portfolio in the hope that it can keep more of its 1.2 billion users engaged with the job site platform for longer.

The launch of Sudoku marks LinkedIn's sixth game, which is designed to be played more quickly (within two to three minutes) with a 6x6 layout compared with traditional 9x9 versions of the game.

As with previous games added to the platform, LinkedIn believes Sudoku could serve as an ice-breaker to spark friendly competition among colleagues.

LinkedIn continues to add games to the platform

Although the platform is primarily designed for professional social networking, millions are said to play games on the platform daily, with peak time at 7am ET.

"More than a year after launching LinkedIn Games, engagement remains strong," the company wrote in a post.

It's estimated 86% of today's players will return tomorrow, and 82% will return next week, with Gen Z most likely to participate in online gaming.

Although Meta's platforms count more users than LinkedIn (3.5 billion daily users) and better fiscal growth, LinkedIn is less challenged in the space, focusing on professional networks rather than personal engagement - last quarter, the Microsoft-owned platform saw a 9% growth in revenue to $4.6 billion.

Recent months have seen countless incremental upgrades to the platform, including the addition of new games and useful injections of AI tools to help both job seekers and recruiters be more efficient.

This particular game comes with plenty of credentials, being built in collaboration with Nikoli (the Japanese publisher than popularized Sudoku) and Thomas Snyder, three-time World Sudoku Champion and puzzle designer.

"We don’t want to have a puzzle on LinkedIn that takes 20 minutes to solve, right?” LinkedIn Senior Director of Product Lakshman Somasundaram said in an interview with CNBC, speaking about the game's more condensed design.

You might also like

• LinkedIn launches free AI tools for you to find the perfect job
• These are the best social networking apps to stay in touch
• Consider using the best online collaboration tools

The UK and EU face a defining challenge—and opportunity—as they chart their digital economic futures. How can we unlock the full value of transformative technologies like AI, quantum computing, and cloud infrastructure while managing the growing tide of cyber threats?

The answer lies not in choosing between innovation and regulation, but in reimagining cybersecurity policy as a strategic lever for economic growth.

Today, trust in digital systems is a prerequisite for digital transformation. From small businesses to multinational firms, no organization can scale without confidence in the security of its infrastructure.

However, trust doesn’t emerge on its own—it’s built through smart, risk-informed policy. That’s why cybersecurity must be at the center of economic strategy, not an afterthought to it.

Growing recognition

Across the UK and Europe, there’s growing recognition of this link. For example, the UK’s Cyber Security and Resilience Bill positions cyber readiness as a core part of economic resilience. The EU’s cybersecurity policies also explicitly supports digital skills, market development, and cross-border data flows.

But to truly crystalize this moment, a clearer statement of how these policies are being designed to meet the moment is needed from government officials.

I recently attended the RSA Conference in the US and then travelled across both the UK and EU. Speaking with a variety of policymakers in different regions reminded me of the need we have to focus on partnerships, procurement and pivot in our cyber policy frameworks. I call these the “three Ps.”

Partnerships – Getting governments and the private sector on the same side of the table

High profile attacks such as those on the NHS, retailers and TfL over the past year have really brought into focus the impact cyberattacks can have on the wider population, and how fragile our digital systems are.

Cyber threats and how cyber policy can protect AI, cloud systems, and critical infrastructure were among the top concerns in every conversation I had with government stakeholders across the UK and EU.

To deliver cyber policy, however, governments and industry must sit on the same side of the table, working together to reduce systemic risk; cybersecurity cannot be delivered top-down. This means moving beyond passive compliance checklists toward dynamic, data-driven collaboration.

Private sector businesses often possess advanced technological capabilities and gather vast amounts of data through their daily operations, offering invaluable insights into emerging cyber threats.

Government agencies, on the other hand, bring a broader geopolitical and strategic understanding that helps interpret private sector data within the context of national and international security threats.

Bringing the government’s geopolitical context and regulatory levers together with the private sector’s technical capabilities and real-time intelligence, creates far more effective policies and faster threat responses.

Governments need to go beyond self-attested best practices and design partnerships that actively analyze the data gathered to identify which behaviors and deterrents actually work within a nation’s unique risk environment.

For small and medium-sized businesses in particular, clear, practical guidance shaped in collaboration is often the difference between resilience and risk exposure.

Some governments are doing better than others in recognizing the ability to translate complex policy goals into actionable, plain-speak directives, but this needs more intentional thought and design.

Procurement – Building success for the future

Economic growth will continue to increasingly depend upon digital infrastructure. For example, the UK government announced this year the AI Opportunities Action Plan and a £121 million investment boost for quantum technology. At the core of both announcements was how AI and quantum support the government’s economic mission.

Cybersecurity also plays a foundational role in the creation of resilient economic strategies. However, similar to intelligence sharing between the public and private sectors, the two parties often develop capabilities in silos that don’t work together. This leads to gaps in terms of the capabilities governments need and the solutions available to them on the market.

Cyber policy should guide how governments buy, fund, and signal the technologies they want to see in the market. This essentially means thinking about how the systems you build today will support success tomorrow.

We’re seeing governments improve in this area. For example, the NCSC’s guidance on post-quantum cryptography is a great example of future-focused leadership. While we don’t yet know when the "quantum year" will arrive, it’s encouraging to see progress and growing awareness that organizations need to be ready.

However, this alone is not enough. More incentives are needed to signal this as a priority for the private sector. Remember, procurement isn’t just a back-office function—it’s an economic strategy.

Research and Development (R&D) projects are an effective way to encourage collaboration and build momentum, and this is particularly needed in AI.

Britain, for instance, has some of the best universities and R&D centers in the world but loses talent to better-funded AI hubs. Governments have to create a long-term AI skills and R&D strategy that not only develops expertise but retains it.

Pivot! Pivot! Pivot!

In many of my conversations, stakeholders repeatedly used the word “pivot.” I was intrigued as to why this word came up so often. When pressed, I learned that what they really meant was “review.”

This is because not all regulations age well. You just have to look at the growing calls to review the Computer Misuse Act, for example. There’s a growing recognition among the UK and EU that some aspects of tech policy and investment need reviewing.

Some cybersecurity rules, though well-intentioned, may add a compliance burden—which in itself is a risk—without reducing actual cyber or business risk. Software misconfigurations, third-party supply chain risks, and emerging threats are not always addressed by the ever-growing complexity of overlapping regulations and rules designed to manage cyber risk.

This isn’t particularly new—we’ve long debated the balance between regulation and building trusted partnerships. While we want to open new frontiers for investment and innovation, it shouldn’t come at the expense of public trust.

However, this age-old argument is starting to shift. There’s greater recognition that the best way to maintain public trust isn’t necessarily through universal regulations, but through considered trade-offs.

Policymakers must be willing to pivot—reviewing what’s working, sunsetting what isn’t, and designing regulation that is adaptive, risk-based, and innovation-friendly.

The key is balance. Governments have to keep in mind the overall goal of policy: understanding the security of systems, minimizing the impact on resilience, and ensuring long-term economic growth.

Cyber is at the forefront of policy

Although I’ve had many different conversations with decision-makers, what struck me most was that security is no longer an afterthought, it’s now a central focus for governments.

From a private sector standpoint, cybersecurity is no longer a cost of doing business—it’s a condition for doing business. And it’s a competitive advantage waiting to be seized.

If the UK and EU want to continue enabling the next era of digital growth, they must address cybersecurity policies as a suite of policies that enable economic growth, focusing on partnerships and procurement, and having the courage to pivot when necessary.

We list the best Request For Proposal (RFP) platform.

This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro's Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro

A phone plan with unlimited data means you never need to worry about whether you're about to get cut off. We pick our favorites among plans from Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile.

• The Huawei Mate XT 2 could land on September 10
• That's the same week we're expecting the iPhone
• The first Huawei tri-fold was launched last year

The pioneering, triple-folding Huawei Mate XT that launched in 2024 is due to get a successor later this year – and the latest rumor suggests the premium device is going to be unveiled around the same time as the Apple iPhone 17 series.

This information comes from well-known tipster Fixed Focus Digital on Chinese social media platform Weibo (via Android Headlines), who says we can expect to see the Huawei Mate XT 2 announced on Wednesday, September 10.

If you've been keeping pace with the flurry of iPhone 17 rumors in recent weeks, then you'll know those are pointing to Tuesday, September 9 as the big day for the grand unveiling of Apple's next flagship phones.

The usual iPhone upgrades are in the pipeline – a faster processor, better cameras, and so on – but there's no doubt that it's Huawei that will be unveiling the most innovative and exciting handset that week, if these rumors prove to be accurate.

When are we getting a foldable iPhone?

Apple has always taken a rather slow and steady approach to smartphone innovation, which helps explain why Huawei is now on its second tri-fold phone and Samsung is on its seventh round of foldables, while Apple has yet to even hint that a foldable iPhone is coming.

The most recent information we have suggests that Apple will finally launch a folding iPhone in September 2026, alongside the iPhone 18 line. After that, we might get treated to a new model every 12 months, as Apple gets more familiar with the manufacturing process.

Rumors indicate that Apple has been working hard to minimize the crease on its foldable iPhone, and we're expecting it to cost a fair bit too. Other leaks suggest it won't claim the title of the thinnest foldable phone when it appears.

A folding iPhone has been a long time coming, and we're looking forward to seeing it, but Apple has a lot of catching up to do at this point, with Samsung expected to launch its own tri-fold phone at some point in October.

You might also like

• One Huawei Mate XT will cost you four PS5 Pros
• These are the best foldables you can buy
• The price of the folding iPhone might not matter

• The iPhone 17 Air might have an A19 Pro chipset
• But it could have one less GPU core than the iPhone 17 Pro
• It might also have a worse screen and battery

The rumored iPhone 17 Air is an intriguing handset, as it could be a big hit for Apple – or a colossal failure, depending on how well Apple balances its build with its specs, and on how much people take to a super-slim iPhone. The latest leak though suggests Apple might not have got the balance right for me.

According to Fixed Focus Digital – a leaker with a reasonable track record – posting on Weibo (via GSMArena), the iPhone 17 Air will have an A19 Pro chipset, just like the iPhone 17 Pro and the iPhone 17 Pro Max. Except, it won’t quite be the same here, as this source claims that the Air’s version will have five GPU cores, while the version used by the Pro phones will have six.

It remains to be seen how much difference that will make, but it would mean the iPhone 17 Air is less powerful than the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max – though still probably more powerful than the base iPhone 17, which will reportedly have a non-Pro version of the A19.

Battery, screen, and camera compromises

The iPhone 16 Pro (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

But this isn’t the Air’s only rumored compromise, as the same source also says that it will have a worse screen and battery than the iPhone 17 Pro.

They don’t get specific here as to the ways in which they’re worse, but presumably this means a lower battery capacity. As for the screen, that’s probably a reference to a previous claim they made that the base iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Air wouldn’t have a variable refresh rate, and in turn therefore probably wouldn’t have an always-on display – though they will at least apparently have 120Hz screens.

So that’s quite a lot of compromises, and – coupled with the iPhone 17 Air probably just having one rear camera – this would almost certainly be too much of a compromise for me. Really, it seems only those who value aesthetics over everything else would choose to purchase the Air.

Yet there might be a lot of buyers like that, with Fixed Focus Digital predicting that the iPhone 17 Air will be a hit. So it will be interesting to see how well it actually does. We should find out in September, as that’s when the entire iPhone 17 series is expected to launch.

You might also like

• 'This looks hideous': the iPhone 17 Pro has been shown off in a new orange shade that you’re going to either love or hate
• New iPhone 17 rumors tease pricing and colors – and there's good news and bad news
• The foldable iPhone could have much smaller screens than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7

• Alien: Earth's cast have teased what's next for their characters' complicated relationship
• The individuals they portray are reunited in the sci-fi horror show's second episode
• It's an encounter that comes as a major shock to one of them

Alien: Earth's cast have teased what fans can expect from their characters' complex relationship following their reunion in episode 2.

Speaking to TechRadar before Alien: Earth's two-episode premiere, Sydney Chandley and Alex Lawther suggested there'll be many moments of "tension" and "vulnerability" between their characters throughout the sci-fi horror show's next six entries.

Major spoilers immediately follow for Alien: Earth episodes 1 and 2. Turn back now if you haven't watched them yet.

Sydney Chandley plays Wendy, a synthetic with the consciousness of a child (Image credit: FX Networks/Hulu/Disney+)

As I briefly touched on in my Alien: Earth review, Chandler plays a Hybrid called Wendy. Created by Prodigy Corp., one of Earth's five multinationals, Hybrids are technological prototypes that see the consciousness of a child transferred into the body of an adult-sized synthetic. The reason children are used for such experiments is that their minds are more malleable than adults, so they won't reject the transformation process.

Episodes 1 and 2 of the Alien franchise's first-ever TV show reveal there's more to Wendy's creation than meets the eye, though. For one, her real name isn't Wendy, but rather the name this Hybrid picks for her transcendence. As we learn, her actual name is Marcy and she was chosen to be the first Hybrid because she had a terminal illness.

That's not all. Marcy was the biological sister of Joe 'CJ' Hermit, a medic employed by Prodigy who's portrayed by Lawther. Instead of telling Joe the truth about what happened to his younger sibling, Prodigy claimed Marcy had died. Oh, and the nefarious megacorporation also lied to Marcy about why Joe couldn't visit her at their secret Neverland headquarters – Prodigy telling Marcy he was always too busy to pay her a visit.

Joe is involved in the search and rescue operation in Prodigy City (Image credit: FX Networks)

However, when Wendy learns that Joe is part of the search and rescue operation after a Weyland-Yutani deep space research vessel crash lands on Prodigy City – a spaceship filled with terrifying creatures, no less – she convinces Prodigy CEO Boy Kavalier to send her, Kirsh, and her fellow Hybrids to aid the rescue effort. Long story short: Wendy/Marcy tracks down her brother, but it's not exactly the perfect reunion she was hoping for.

Considering he'd made peace with his sister's passing, it's easy to see why Joe can't grasp the fact that Marcy is somehow back from the dead. And, while Wendy/Marcy manages to convince Joe it's really her via a trip down memory lane in the Alien series' second chapter, it's clear that things can't go back to the way they were when the pair were kids.

"It's really fun to play with the vulnerability and innocence she carries, and marry that with the fact she's basically a weapon," Chandler said. "What does that do to the mind of a child? And what does that do to your sense of fear and your sense of identity?

"For Wendy, I think if she doesn't have her brother and that tie to her real life, her understanding of her identity could start to wobble," Chandler added. "It's very important for other reasons as well, but he's the only other person on earth who knows her as her full self. Everyone else is telling her she's something different, so she needs Joe to keep reminding herself of who she is."

A post shared by Alien: Earth (@alienearthfx)

A photo posted by on

"Nobody sees Marcy the way that Joe does," Lawther added. "It becomes that thing of longing for this person [Marcy] to be the person that they say they are, rather than what they seem to be [Wendy].

"And that causes tension between them," Lawther continued. "Joe's hanging onto this idea of his sibling who she can no longer be. He can't quite grasp this concept of this Hybrid being his sister, but being something else, too. He has a hard time recognizing the person that he lost and we'll see how that all unfolds as time goes on."

Alien: Earth episodes 1 and 2 are out now on Hulu (US) and Disney+(internationally). New episodes air weekly.

You might also like

• Is Alien: Earth's scheming tech bro inspired by Elon Musk, Sam Altman, or Mark Zuckerburg? Star Samuel Blenkin has his say on the matter
• Alien: Earth star teases his mysterious cyborg character in the Hulu sci-fi horror show: 'he's an iPhone 1 in a world of iPhone 20s'
• Alien: Earth's Timothy Olyphant only needed to do one thing to get into character for the sci-fi horror show: 'It does a lot of the work for me'

• Workday study finds not many workers are happy being managed by AI, or seeing AI operate independently
• Nine in 10 believe AI agents could help boost their productivity at work
• Nearly half are worried about AI's effect on their critical thinking

The majority of workers say they are comfortable working with AI agents, however far fewer (30%) are comfortable being managed by them, new research has found.

The findings from Workday comes as four in five (82%) organizations expand their use of AI agents, with workers now demanding clearer boundaries and reassurance about their roles.

On the whole, the study found workers are generally happier when they're in control of artificial intelligence, with 75% fine with AI tools recommending skills or working alongside them compared with 24% who are comfortable with it operating in the background, without human knowledge.

Workers prefer to know when AI is being used

How much a worker trusts AI comes down to how much they use it – 95% of experienced users trust the tech, with only 36% of AI 'explorers' trusting responsible use.

"Building trust means being intentional in how AI is used and keeping people at the center of every decision," Workday AI VP Kathy Pham explained.

However, despite apprehension around advanced agentic AI taking control in the background, workers still acknowledge how it could help them.

Nine in 10 employees believe AI agents will help them get more done. To that degree, nearly half (48%) worry that the added productivity could come with increased pressure at work, potentially by increased workloads, as well as a decline in critical thinking (48%).

Rather than seeing AI as a human replacement and full colleague, most of the study's participants prefer to see AI as a teammate that can boost their own productivity. Sensitive areas like hiring, finance and legal matters are where it's perceived less favorably, underscoring the need for human oversight.

"We’re entering a new era of work where AI can be an incredible partner, and a complement to human judgement, leadership, and empathy," Pham added,

Still, despite early concerns, workers are less likely to worry about AI taking their jobs (12%), with most believing AI could actually help address ongoing talent shortages (76%).

You might also like

• These are the best AI writers around
• Check out our roundup of the best online collaboration tools
• "You may lose your job to an engineer who uses AI" - here's why so many US workers pretend to use AI on the job