TechRadar Reviews

News

Reviews

The Polaroid Go Gen 3 is a palm-sized instant camera that produces lovely little prints — in the right conditions
I reviewed Klipsch's The Nines II powered stereo speakers, and they're definitely keepers — great sound and nice features in a compact size (though it helps if you're feeling strong)
Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Dock review: A Thunderbolt 5 docking station with more ports and features than you'll know what to do with
‘Feels like a natural breeze’: I reviewed Dyson’s clever purifying fan that follows you around the room, and was blown away by its smart features and wonderfully engineered performance
DaVinci Resolve Studio 21 review: Pro-grade video editing software with some amazing - and terrifying - AI tools

URL: https://www.techradar.com/rss/reviews

Updated: 1 hour 16 min ago

Creatio CRM Review 2026

Tue, 06/16/2026 - 06:03

Creatio is a comprehensive CRM platform that aims to streamline sales, marketing, and service processes for businesses of all sizes. I found its no-code approach to workflow automation and customization really interesting.

The platform is divided into three main modules - Sales, Marketing, and Service - each offering a robust set of features. From lead management and opportunity tracking to multichannel marketing campaigns to customer support ticketing, Creatio covers a wide range of CRM functionalities. However, this breadth of capabilities comes at a price, both in terms of cost and complexity.

Its extensive customization options, while beneficial, can be overwhelming for those seeking a more straightforward CRM. But if you like the idea of building your own no-code CRM by rigorously customizing different aspects of the application, all without resorting to actual coding, this might be a great option.

Creatio CRM core capabilities

As a CRM, Creatio allows users to create detailed customer profiles with a 360-degree view of each contact, including communication history, associated deals, and relevant documents. But the real standout here is its no-code nature, which allows users to customize the platform and create new applications without extensive programming knowledge.

Creatio consolidates information from various touchpoints, providing a complete picture of customer interactions across sales, marketing, and service departments. The platform provides tools to capture leads from multiple sources and guide them through a customizable sales funnel.

I appreciated the ability to set up automated lead scoring rules, which help prioritize prospects based on their likelihood to convert. As leads progress, Creatio allows sales teams to track potential deals, associate them with specific accounts, and manage all related activities in one place.

Creatio CRM uses your historical data and current pipeline information to generate accurate sales predictions. I was impressed by the AI-driven forecasting capabilities, which analyze patterns and trends to provide more precise estimates.

It also offers a wide range of pre-built reports and dashboards covering various aspects of sales, marketing, and customer service performance. That said, where the platform really shines is the drag-and-drop report builder, which lets you customize reports to an uncanny degree.

Apart from the no-code CRM, Creatio has a few things that make it stand apart from most competitors. It offers tools for creating and managing multi-channel marketing campaigns, case management tools, a knowledge base for self-service, and even a visual process designer to automate complex business processes across departments.

There’s a wide range of pre-built connectors to integrate with popular third-party applications, plus custom integration support through an open API.

For employees in the field, Creatio’s mobile app provides access to key CRM functions on the go, including contact management, opportunity tracking, and activity logging. I appreciated the offline mode, which allows users to continue working even without an internet connection, with data syncing once connectivity is restored.

How easy is Creatio to use?

(Image credit: Creatio)

Creatio CRM combines powerful features with a user-friendly design, making it a great choice for businesses. While its many capabilities can feel a bit overwhelming at first, I found the interface welcoming and modern, following the latest design trends.

Navigating the platform is easy, thanks to a clear layout and a navigation bar at the top that gives quick access to sections like Sales, Marketing, and Service. Users can customize their home dashboard, arranging widgets and data visuals based on what matters most to them.

Creatio embraces a no-code approach, making it simple to adjust layouts and fields, or even create new sections in the CRM without needing programming skills. The drag-and-drop interface designer is a fantastic tool, allowing users to quickly tailor the CRM to fit their needs. However, those who prefer simpler systems might feel a bit lost with so many options.

Data entry is typically smooth, with smart features that help fill in fields and detect duplicates to keep information accurate. However, during busy times, I did notice some slight delays in data updates, which could be frustrating for users working with urgent tasks.

Creatio has made impressive strides in accessibility, yet there is still room for growth. The platform supports keyboard navigation and has some screen reader compatibility, but certain dynamic elements might be tricky for users who rely on assistive technologies. The overall color contrast is good, which helps with readability, but some areas could use a little more work to fully meet WCAG Guidelines.

The Creatio Academy is a fantastic resource, offering many e-learning courses that cover everything from basic navigation to advanced customization techniques. I particularly enjoyed the guided learning programs. They provide interactive, instructor-led training sessions that focus on practical tasks, which can be very helpful for users eager to master the platform's more complex features.

In general, Creatio works by guiding users through predefined workflows that can be tailored to fit specific business processes. This helps ensure consistency across sales, marketing, and service operations in an organization. However, it may require adjustment for users used to a more flexible way of working.

Integrations

Creatio CRM stands out with its impressive integration capabilities, showcasing its dedication to creating a connected ecosystem for businesses. From my experience, Creatio makes it easy for both technical and non-technical users to navigate its integration features.

The Creatio Marketplace is a treasure trove, offering over 700 ready-to-use add-ons, connectors, and templates. Its range of options helps businesses quickly link Creatio with popular tools and platforms, without extensive development work. I found the setup for these pre-built integrations simple, often just requiring a few quick configuration steps.

Creatio also supports popular iPaaS (Integration Platform as a Service) vendors. The Zapier connector available in the Marketplace, for example, makes it easy for users to sync contacts, leads, and other important data across many applications.

For those with more advanced integration needs, Creatio offers a powerful API based on the OData protocol. It allows developers full access to Creatio's data model. But while the API provides great flexibility, new developers may find it a bit challenging to understand Creatio's data structure at first. API documentation is thorough, but adding more real-world examples could really help with practical implementation.

Beyond just data synchronization, Creatio's no-code approach empowers users to build complex, automated workflows across different systems. For example, I successfully set up a process that automatically creates a new contact in Creatio when a lead comes in from a marketing tool, and then triggers a follow-up task in a project management app.

Overall, my experience with data synchronization in Creatio has been mostly positive, with real-time updates working well most of the time. Still, I did notice some occasional delays during busy periods, which businesses with high-volume and time-sensitive data might want to keep in mind.

For larger enterprises, Creatio also provides specialized integration options. A great example is the Snowflake Integration for Creatio available in the Marketplace, which helps businesses connect their Creatio instance with Snowflake data warehouses.

Customer support

Creatio CRM has a strong customer support system across various channels. During my time with the platform, I found that it offers phone, email, as well as live chat support. Phone support is available during business hours. But email and chat are accessible 24/7. Chat responses are quick, often within minutes.

The support quality is generally high. Representatives seem to know the platform well, too. They offer step-by-step instructions that help solve even the most complex issues easily. However, response times can slow down during busy periods, which raises concerns for busy teams.

Creatio also has a well-organized self-service knowledge base. It includes articles, videos, and guides on various topics. The search function is particularly useful. Additionally, there’s an active user forum for peer support. That said, official responses in the forum can be slow.

Another key feature is Creatio Academy, offering free courses and certifications. It's beneficial for both new and experienced users, with courses structured around practical exercises. I liked how each course is part of a larger learning program, making it easy to follow along.

But, Creatio could improve by adding more region-specific support. While it supports multiple languages, time zone differences can make live support hard to access. Overall, however, Creatio's support is robust and effective. It combines live support, self-service resources, and training courses well. Despite some areas for improvement, the support quality is a major strength.

Creatio CRM pricing and plans

Plan

Growth

Enterprise

Unlimited

Price

From $40 /user/month

From $70 - $75 /user/month

Custom Quote Only

Best For

Small to medium-sized businesses looking to automate basic workflows

Corporate and enterprise clients with more complex automation requirements

Large enterprises needing advanced features and unlimited resources

Features

No-code UI designer / 1 GB storage per user / Basic workflow automation

Unlimited workflow runs / Custom branding options / Advanced automation tools

Unlimited database storage / Custom domain name / No-code Magic offer

Limitations

Limited storage and workflow capabilities may restrict scalability for larger organizations

May be overkill for small businesses with simple CRM needs

High cost may not be justifiable for businesses not utilizing all advanced features

Navigating Creatio’s pricing means looking past standard per-user SaaS marketing and understanding its multi-layered architecture. Creatio charges a two-part composable fee: a base platform license (the no-code application layer) paired with your specific operational application module (such as Sales, Marketing, or Service, which typically adds an incremental $15/user/month). This updates the true public starting rates to $40/user/month for the Growth tier and $70 to $75/user/month for the Enterprise package.

The most critical criterion for prospective buyers to bear in mind is the fact that Creatio has a minimum initialization spend of $10,000 per year for all new accounts. This means that despite the accessible per-user framing of the Growth tier, the system is explicitly priced out of range for micro-teams and instead serves as a baseline launchpad for mid-market environments that can deploy across dozens of seats simultaneously.

The entry-level Growth tier safely enables no-code interface creation and basic script modifications, capping database storage at 1 GB per user. Upgrading to Enterprise lifts execution caps, unlocks custom system branding, activates single sign-on (SSO/LDAP) credentials, and brings extended 365-day security audit logs online for highly regulated environments.

It's also worth noting that Creatio’s structural philosophy shifts at the Enterprise tier. Rather than continuing to scale seat pricing in a way that limits corporate deployment, the Unlimited tier removes per-user licensing entirely. It is a custom-quoted corporate framework engineered specifically to support human workforce collaboration alongside autonomous AI agents, granting unlimited application deployment, unrestricted database storage, and complete access to the Creatio AI Studio ecosystem.

How we tested Creatio

At TechRadar Pro, our enterprise software reviews are based upon rigorous, practical evaluation rather than a passive breakdown of vendor feature lists. To truly evaluate Creatio’s no-code capabilities and automated framework, our business software analysts subjected the platform to a demanding testing regimen designed to simulate deployment across a multi-department enterprise.

Given the widespread adoption of AI-driven workflows, we dedicated an intensive testing phase to the platform's native Creatio AI Studio. Instead of testing generic prompt generation, we evaluated the platform's machine learning accuracy by feeding it historical transaction data to generate automated sales projections and predictive lead scores.

We also audited the operational boundary limits of their lifetime AI token allocation models, evaluating how efficiently the system routes autonomous tasks and manages generative text responses for incoming customer queries before requiring a business to buy extra token packages. You can find out more regarding our CRM testing process here.

Creatio review: Final verdict

Creatio is a fantastic CRM for mid-market and enterprise organizations that want to build custom, highly automated CRM systems without writing a single line of code. By combining sales, marketing, and customer service modules with an advanced AI Studio within a single composable platform, it eliminates the need for fragmented third-party software. For larger teams aiming to maximize their visual workflow designers and custom AI agents, it offers unmatched operational flexibility.

However, this sophisticated architecture demands significant technical discipline and capital. Between its multi-layered, composable pricing model and a strict $10,000 minimum annual contract requirement, Creatio is explicitly priced out of reach for small businesses. If your team lacks the internal resources to navigate a steep initialization phase or simply needs a lightweight, out-of-the-box pipeline manager, Creatio’s massive feature ecosystem will feel like expensive overkill.

Categories: Reviews

The latest 2026 Razer Blade 18 is a monster of a gaming laptop that annihilates the competition – if you can afford the price of admission

Tue, 06/16/2026 - 04:35

Razer Blade 18 (2026): Two-minute review

Another year, another Razer Blade laptop lineup. At this point, these reviews have become something of a foregone conclusion for me; if there are three things I can reliably expect from each new Blade release, it's great gaming performance, a sleek and robust design, and a sky-high price tag.

Sure enough, the latest Blade 18 (2026) delivers on all three fronts – but I can't just say 'yep, buy it if you can afford it'. This new Blade is superior to its predecessors in several ways, and it's quite possibly the best large-screen gaming laptop (or portable workstation) you can buy right now.

Having seen the dawn of Nvidia RTX 5000 GPUs in Razer's laptops when I reviewed the Razer Blade 16 (2025) last year, I had some idea of what to expect in terms of performance. The new Blade 18 did not disappoint in this regard, delivering top-notch gaming quality across everything I tested.

(Image credit: Future)

Those games look better than ever on the new display as well, since this Blade doesn't eschew 4K display options as the 16-inch model does. That's not all I have to say about the screen, though. This Blade has an ace up its sleeve; a dual-mode display that can be switched between UHD+ 240Hz and FHD+ 440Hz modes.

I'll dig more into the specifics of this later, but it's a feature that will appeal specifically to esports-oriented gamers. In the upper echelons of competitive gaming, resolution takes a back seat to framerate in terms of importance, so being able to nearly double the maximum refresh rate of your screen at the cost of locking your resolution to 1200p becomes a very attractive tradeoff.

Still, even if you're not a hardcore esports gamer, there's little doubt that the Razer Blade 18 is worthy of standing among the best gaming laptops on the market right now. The updated design and premium build quality of the CNC-milled metal chassis, combined with the powerful gaming and creative performance (and great functionality for AI workloads, if you're so inclined), make this an easy winner – just as long as you can afford the steep price of the higher-spec configurations.

Razer Blade 18 (2026) review: Price & availability

(Image credit: Future)

Starts from $3,499.99 / £3,299.99 (around AU$4,870)
Available now in the US and UK
No Australian release yet

Yeah, it's pretty bloody expensive. Just the starting configuration of the Razer Blade 18 will set you back a hefty $3,499.99 / £3,299.99 (around AU$4,870), though even the base specs are fairly impressive: an Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX processor, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti GPU, 32GB of RAM (no wonder it's so pricey, with RAM prices spiralling out of control due to AI datacenter demand), and a 1TB SSD.

You can also get RTX 5080 and 5090 models, with my review configuration sporting the latter GPU along with an upgraded Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus CPU and double the SSD storage.

The absolute top-spec model, which also bumps the RAM up to 128GB, will cost you an eye-watering $6,999.99 - and this configuration is only available in the US, with UK models topping out at 64GB and no availability whatsoever in Australia – sorry to our readers on the other side of the globe, but you're stuck with the Blade 14 and 16 unless you want to spend extra to import the 18-inch model.

Razer Blade 18 (2026) review: Specs

Base spec

Review spec

Max spec

Price

$3,499.99 / £3,299.99 (around AU$4,870)

$5,399.99 / £4,799.99 (around AU$7,510)

$6,999.99 (around £5,200 / AU$9,735

CPU

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus

Graphics

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop GPU

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop GPU

RAM

32GB DDR5

128GB DDR5

Display

18-inch Dual UHD+ 240Hz / FHD+ 440Hz

Storage

1TB NVMe SSD PCIe Gen4

2TB NVMe SSD PCIe Gen4

Ports and Connectivity

3x USB-A (3.2 Gen2), 1x USB-C (Thunderbolt 5), 1x USB-C (Thunderbolt 4), 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x SD card reader, 1x RJ-45 Ethernet, 1x 3.5mm combo audio; Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4

Battery

99Whr

Weight

7.06lbs / 3.20kg

Dimensions

1.1 x 15.7 x 10.8 inches / 28.7 x 40.0 x 27.5 cm

Razer Blade 18 (2026) review: Design

(Image credit: Future)

Thin for a large gaming laptop, but heavy
Premium precision-milled aluminum chassis
Plenty of ports

Long gone are the days when Razer couldn't resist the urge to cram RGB lighting into every nook and cranny of a product. Like its most recent predecessors, the 2026 Blade 18 is a clean, minimalist piece of hardware, with a pleasingly large keyboard and a chassis crafted from a single block of tempered aluminum.

As you might expect, the large display and all-metal body mean that the Blade 18 is rather heavy, weighing more than 3 kilograms. It's not exactly a device you'd want to regularly take with you on the go, but I will note that it's surprisingly slender for such a powerhouse laptop, measuring barely more than an inch thick with the lid closed.

(Image credit: Future)

The wide touchpad and well-spaced, comfortable backlit keyboard are excellent, making longer typing or gaming sessions very comfortable – though of course, I used a USB mouse for gaming. No, I'm not one of those terrifying Valorant players who only use the touchpad.

Speaking of plugging in peripherals, there's a fine selection of physical ports here, with the 18-inch Blade giving you three USB-As and two USB-Cs (one of which is a high-speed Thunderbolt 5 port) as well as an HDMI port, RJ-45 Ethernet, and an SD card reader – great for professional creatives who work with cameras. With regard to wireless connectivity, you get Bluetooth 5.4 and high-speed Wi-Fi 7.

The webcam is also surprisingly decent, capable of capturing 1440p video at 30Hz, which comfortably outdoes any webcam you'll find on the average office laptop. Considering that the webcam is frequently an afterthought on gaming laptops, this was nice to see. It features an IR camera for Windows Hello logins, and a physical privacy shutter (the latter of which should frankly be a feature on every webcam in this day and age).

As is usually the case for modern gaming laptops, there's not much in the way of upgradability here, but you can add in more storage if you're so inclined. There are two PCIe M.2 slots, one of which is occupied by the existing SSD, and the system supports up to 8TB of additonal storage per slot, meaning you can have up to 16TB of storage – assuming you have very deep pockets, given the current price of SSDs.

(Image credit: Future)

Now, let's discuss this display. In its default mode, it's a particularly nice 4K (3840 x 2400p) panel with a 240Hz refresh rate, 3ms response time, and an impressive 600 nits of maximum brightness. It's also Calman verified for color accuracy, with a 100% DCI-P3 gamut, meaning that games look bright and vibrant, and pro-level photo or video editing is a very realistic proposition.

But if you swap it into high refresh rate mode, the maximum resolution drops to FHD+ (1920 x 1200p) and the refresh rate leaps to a blindingly fast 440Hz. It's geared towards hardcore esports players who want their framerates to be as high as possible, for games like Counter-Strike 2 and Valorant where every millisecond matters.

Now, I'll be honest here; the beefy gaming performance of my RTX 5090-equipped review unit meant that I was comfortably getting high framerates at native UHD+ resolution, so I never really felt the need to use the 440Hz mode. I accept that I'm not the target audience for a feature like this (yes, I kind of suck at Valorant), but I'm not in a small crowd there. The majority of PC gamers won't really be able to eke any significant benefit from the high refresh rate mode, and switching to it is a bit of a fiddly process too: you have to use Razer's Synapse software to change the display mode, then restart the whole laptop.

This might seem like a bit of an unfair criticism, but I have to assume that including this dual-mode display functionality added to the overall cost of the Razer Blade 18, and considering that most users won't need or use it, it's a bit difficult to justify its presence here. It's certainly a neat feature that isn't offered by Razer's competitors, though, so I can't knock Razer too much for it.

Razer Blade 18 (2026) review: Performance

(Image credit: Future)

Silky-smooth AAA gaming
Powerful creative performance
Gets a bit hot under load

Razer Blade 18 (2026) benchmarks

3DMark: Night Raid: 92,118; Fire Strike: 40,643; Steel Nomad: 6,433; Speed Way: 6,522; Solar Bay: 118,863
Geekbench 6: Multicore: 20,376; Single-core: 3,212
Cinebench R24: Single Core: 141; Multi Core: 2,071
Crossmark: Overall: 2,340; Productivity: 2,168; Creativity: 2,767; Responsiveness: 1,905
Passmark Overall: 15,304; CPU: 63,824; 2D Graphics: 1,048; 3D Graphics: 30,935; Memory: 3,882; Disk: 45,916
BlackMagicDisk: Read: 4,832MB/s; Write: 3,390MB/s
HandBrake 4K to 1080p: 125.6fps
Civilization VII: (Max resolution, AMD FSR 3, High): 156fps; (1080p, High): 231fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: (Max resolution, Highest, Balanced upscaling): 177fps; (1080p, Highest, SMAA x4): 218fps
Total War: Warhammer III: Mirrors of Madness (1080p, Ultra): 187fps; (Max Resolution, Ultra): 65fps
Cyberpunk 2077: (Max resolution, Ultra, Balanced upscaling): 69fps; (1080p, Ray Tracing: Ultra, Balanced upscaling): 118fps; (1080p, Ultra): 162fps
Marvel Rivals: (Max resolution, Balanced upscaling, Ultra): 72fps; (1200p, Low): 184fps
Battery Life (TechRadar movie test): 8 hours and 21 minutes

Unsurprisingly, the RTX 5090 and Core Ultra 290HX Plus in my Razer Blade 18 review unit absolutely chewed through our selection benchmarking tests, as well as everything else I threw at it.

Razer has long been the brand of 'performance at any cost', and this laptop is no exception to that rule. In 4K gaming benchmarks, it delivered solid performance further boosted by Nvidia's DLSS upscaling, but I didn't need to turn on the still-controversial frame-generation features to ensure a high and stable FPS.

(Image credit: Future)

In terms of gaming performance, I was comfortably getting a stable 60+ frames per second at 4K resolution with maximum graphical settings in almost every game I tested, both within our usual suite of benchmarking games and in a handful of other titles I played during my general testing process, which included Marathon and Alan Wake 2. The fans got a little noisy in the process, but I've heard far worse from other gaming laptops, and

The notable exception here was Total War: Warhammer III, which is historically more reliant on the CPU than the GPU; it appears that the 2nd-gen Intel Core Ultra processor inside the Razer Blade 18 still struggled a little with the 4K Ultra preset here, though I would note that it still managed to maintain an average above 60 FPS at maximum graphical settings, and it's also very power efficient (more on that in the next section).

The only other part of my game testing that gave me pause was a relatively low average at 4K Ultra settings in Marvel Rivals. Although the game ran stably, my average FPS sat at a little over 70 in the built-in benchmark – yet in actual matches, I found that the FPS counter very rarely dropped below 100, so I'm a little unclear on what caused this. Driver and OS updates, multiple tweaks to the in-game and display settings, and even running the game via an external 4K monitor did not seem to remedy this. I won't mark the Blade 18 down for this, though, as it appeared to be an anomaly with Rivals rather than the laptop itself.

(Image credit: Future)

Turn on Nvidia's frame-gen tech, and you'll see those numbers skyrocket across almost every game I tested. I was getting 40% stable gains on average with 2x mode across four different games, with no noticeable impact on visual fidelity.

3x and 4x modes push the framerate higher, but do start to degrade the visual quality of gameplay; I found that 4x mode was prone to tearing and artifacting in all games tested except Alan Wake 2, to the point where it wasn't worth the trade-off in improved framerate.

Outside of gaming benchmarks, the Blade 18 excelled in virtually every area; 2D and 3D rendering, productivity workloads, transfer speeds, single- and multi-core CPU workloads... you name it, this laptop can power through it. For users who want a gaming laptop that can also pull double duty for high-end professional creative or scientific workloads, this Blade has got the goods.

Razer Blade 18 (2026) review: Battery life

(Image credit: Future)

Fantastic for a gaming laptop
Outlasts many rivals
Bundled charger is proprietary, not USB-C

I'll make no bones about this: for a high-powered gaming laptop, the battery life on the Razer Blade 18 is nothing short of phenomenal.

The average gaming laptop tends to peter out before the 6-hour mark in regular use, with powerful internal components that draw a lot of juice; if you're actively gaming on it, you'll usually be lucky to get more than two hours of play time before needing to seek out a wall socket.

But the Blade 18 mustered an impressive amount of longevity in my testing, reaching nearly eight and a half hours of continuous video playback and more than three and a half hours of continuous gaming in Marathon – a distinctly superior showing to the vast majority of gaming laptops we test at TechRadar, and is most likely down to the excellent power efficiency of the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus processor.

The only downside I can possibly pick out here is that you need to use the bundled proprietary adapter for power delivery, and it's a pretty chunky brick that hurts the laptop's portability. But considering that it's already a great big 18-inch slab of machined aluminum, you shouldn't be buying the Blade 18 if you want a super-portable gaming laptop anyway!

Should I buy the Razer Blade 18 (2026)?Razer Blade 18 (2026): Scorecard

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

Undeniably very expensive, but you're getting a tremendous amount of bang for your buck wrapped in a sleek, well-designed chassis.

4 / 5

Design

Not the most portable due to its large size and weight, but offers best-in-class build quality, a great screen, a comfortable keyboard, and lots of physical ports.

5 / 5

Performance

Stellar performance across gaming, creative, and productivity workloads. This Blade can handle anything you throw at it.

5 / 5

Battery life

Seriously impressive for a gaming laptop, with enough battery life to get through a full workday of basic tasks or multiple hours of gaming between charges.

4.5 / 5

Total Score

The Blade 18 is as premium as gaming laptops get, a powerhouse perfect for hardcore gamers – or creatives pros who like to game on the side.

4.5 / 5

Buy the Razer Blade 18 (2026) if…

You want the best of the best
Simply put, the high-spec configurations of the Blade 18 make it one of the most powerful gaming laptops on the market.

You want a great screen
The 18-inch UHD+ display on the Blade 18 makes games look like a true feast for the eyes, with great color reproduction and a 440Hz FHD+ mode for hardcore esports gamers.

Don't buy it if…

You want something portable
Although it's impressively slim for such a powerful laptop, the Razer Blade 18 is large and heavy, and the AC power adapter brick is also very weighty.

You’re on a budget
Unsurprisingly given its premium specs and build quality, the Blade 18 costs a pretty penny and then some.View Deal

Razer Blade 18 (2026) review: Also consider

MSI Stealth A16 AI+
A similarly powerful but somewhat more compact gaming laptop, the Stealth A16 AI+ packs the same selection of RTX 5000 GPUs as the Blade 18, but trades out an Intel CPU for the latest AMD Ryzen fare instead. Read our full MSI Stealth A16 AI+ review.

Asus V16
If you were reading this review from a more aspirational standpoint and want something that delivers good gaming performance without the eye-watering price tag of the Blade 16, the V16 from Asus is a very solid wallet-friendly pick. Read our full Asus V16 review.

How I tested the Razer Blade 18 (2026)

(Image credit: Future)

Tested for one work week
Used for gaming and other tasks
8+ years of experience reviewing dozens of laptops

I swapped out my usual desktop workstation rig for the Razer Blade 18 for five days (one work week), during which I used it for all my usual activities. This included day-to-day work in the Google software suite, online research, playing videos, and of course a lot of after-hours gaming.

In terms of the games tested, I ran out entire synthetic and gaming benchmark lineup (listed in the 'performance' section of this review, as well as playing some other games that are in my current rotation: Marathon, Warframe, Alan Wake 2, Borderlands 4, and of course my current addition Slay the Spire 2 (though let's be honest, that last one isn't exactly a performance stress-test).

I've been a PC gamer since my tender pre-teen years, starting out on my dad's boxy beige home office desktop, and I've been a professional tech journalist reviewing all kinds of laptops and PC tech for nearly a decade now, starting out at Maximum PC magazine before making the jump to digital journalism and joining the TechRadar team. I've personally reviewed more than seventy laptops, so you can trust that my knowledge and experience give you reliable insights into the quality of the products I write about.

First reviewed: June 2026
Read more about how we test

Categories: Reviews

'They carve out a special and useful niche': I tested OneOdio's new wireless headphones for music pros and DJs — despite some big issues, that low-latency wireless transmitter means I'll use them every day

Mon, 06/15/2026 - 20:00

OneOdio Studio Max 2: Two-minute review

Despite the number in the name, I’ve taken to considering the OneOdio Studio Max 2 to be more like a ‘pro’ version of the originals rather than a completely new pair of headphones. I’ve been testing them for several weeks, and the experience doesn’t feel hugely changed (even though the price is).

The originals upon which they are based were released in early 2025, and after I finished my review, I found myself using them daily. They’re always plugged into my guitar amp or keyboard for when I want to do some music practice; a few select features made them uniquely handy for making music.

The OneOdio Studio Max 2 are, mostly, a very similar proposition. They’re not designed for audiophiles so much as DJs, studio musicians and other music-makers — but they have enough of a consumer-friendly bent that they’re not just for the studio. If you’re an amateur musician or music producer, and want cans for the task in hand but also for general use, you’re the target audience.

Like their predecessors, I wouldn’t strongly recommend these for general use, though. They’re big and chunky, so I felt self-conscious wearing them in public, and the fit was unreliable, so they shook when I was walking. On top of that, the audio quality is pretty poor, and you won’t get noise cancellation. There’s a reason the old pair stayed tethered to my instruments.

That sounds like a deluge of criticism, and an odd one given the score above, but the Studio Max justify themselves with their tools for professionals or music creators.

These puppies connect to other devices in four ways: there’s both a 3.5mm jack and a 6.35mm one, so you’ve got more cable versatility than most other cans. Of course, you’ve got Bluetooth, but there’s also an audio transmitter included in the box that can connect to any analog source.

With the transmitter, you can get 9ms latency between the headphones and audio source. This is OneOdio’s pitch for why they’re great DJ headphones — with no transmission delay, you won't miss your bass-dropping cue. OneOdio isn't the only brand to offer this feature, but crucially, its headphones are the cheapest to do so.

Upgrades to this transmitter also form the main upgrades over the original Studio Max. The latency has been halved from 20ms and the bitrate has been increased, but the transmission distance has been halved to 10m. Given that the price has increased, though, it might not be a tempting upgrade for many buyers of the original.

For music producers or performers, the foldable form factor is appreciated, as is the massive 120-hour battery life over Bluetooth (and the battery life when using the transmitter has been doubled to 50 hours in this model). I can see it being particularly useful for touring musicians for this reason, who can’t charge regularly — although IEMs will still rule supreme for that.

More so than most headphones I test, the OneOdio Studio Max 2 are situational, and niche. I wouldn’t recommend them to people on the market for the best headphones for general use, nor would I suggest professionals buy them over specially-designed studio kit.

But there’s a small overlap in the Venn Diagram between those groups, in which the cans may find appreciative buyers. That's included me, as a dedicated user of the original model — but check the price of the original OneOdio Studio Max 1 before you buy, though, because if it gets price drops, it might be the better-value buy.

OneOdio Studio Max 2 review: Price and release date

(Image credit: Future)

Released in May 2026
They sell for $189 / £179 (about AU$360)
Come with carry case as well as cables and transmitter

The OneOdio Studio Max 2 were unveiled on May 11, 2026 — that’s a year and three months on from the release of their predecessors.

The official price of the Studio Max 2 is $189 / £179 (about AU$360, but they don’t seem to have enjoyed an Australian release at the time of writing).

In the box you get the headphones, transmitter, various cables (loads of cables) and a handy carry case. It’s the complete package, and I’ve never felt the need to root around in my drawers for other wires.

For context, the original Studio Max released for $169 / £135 / AU$275, so there’s been a price hike here, which varies quite a bit by region.

OneOdio Studio Max 2 review: Specs

Drivers

45mm

Active noise cancellation

Battery life

120 hours

Weight

353g

Connectivity

Bluetooth 6.0, 3.5mm, 6.35mm, 2.4Ghz transmitter

Frequency response

20Hz to 40kHz

Waterproofing

OneOdio Studio Max 2 review: Features

(Image credit: Future)

No noise cancellation, and basic phone app
Massive 120-hour battery over Bluetooth
Many connection options including low-latency transmitter

Let’s address the elephant in the room, or lack thereof: there are some features missing here, which some music listeners might miss. There’s no active noise cancellation, for example, and the app is quite barebones. It has three EQ presets (normal, monitoring and bass), and a 10-band custom mode, as well as a few extras such as wear reminders, volume limiters, and a way to pan the sound to the left or right ear cup only.

What you do get is pretty rocking though. Take the battery life: 120 hours equates to five straight days of music playback. No, not five hours. Five days. That figure matches the original pair, and I can’t name another option which lasts that long.

Another key feature is the range of connection options. Naturally, you can connect them via their 3.5mm port, or the 6.35mm jack so they can connect to professional audio kit easily. The Studio Max 2 support Bluetooth 6.0, allowing for more reliable wireless connection than the old pair.

But perhaps the key selling point here is the transmitter, which comes included in the box. Using OneOdio’s RapidWill+ 3.0 technology, this transmitter lets you cut the response time between your source and the Studio Max 2 to just 9ms. It uses 2.4GHz connectivity, and all you need to do is plug it into your output device, and your headphones can pick it up.

All the cables you need are included in the box, so it's a plug-and-play style situation. The transmitter needs to be charged via USB-C, and lasts for 50 hours per charge.

Features score: 4 / 5

OneOdio Studio Max 2 review: Sound quality

(Image credit: Future)

Uses 45mm drivers
Music is muffled and tinny
EQ doesn't help fix things

OneOdio has used a 45mm driver in each Studio Max 2 cup, and the headphones are certified for Hi-Res Audio and Hi-Res Audio Wireless, with LDAC compatibility too. Unfortunately it's not quite the recipe for success it would appear to be on first glance.

The Max 2 sound muddy and muffled, with rumbly and ill-defined bass stomping over over lines of a song. Any semblance of a soundstage is forgotten, instead presenting your music as one amorphous sonic boulder.

Glorious by The Hoosiers is presented like a confused mush of synths, and the bass in Charlie Mars' She Ain't Coming Back veers between drowning out everything else, and being inaudible.

They also offer a sound that's tinnier than anything else at this price point, with noticeably compressed hi-hats and distorted guitars that really shouldn't be distorted. I'd usually cite a song here as an example, but you can basically insert any song that has instruments here.

Usually I'd turn to an equalizer to try to fix problems like this, but you've got three options: the default, a Bass Mode (that's not going to fix the problem), a custom EQ and Monitoring Mode. Those latter two both gave music a crunchier feel, so I stayed far away.

It's worth noting that criticism I levelled here, I also put against the Studio Max 1. As far as I can tell, the sound hasn't changed much.

Sound quality: 2.5 / 5

OneOdio Studio Max 2 review: Design

(Image credit: Future)

Industrial look
Rotatable cups and foldable arms
Plenty of ports and dials

Don’t buy the Studio Max 2 if you’re looking for svelte, lightweight or fashionable over-ear headphones. They’re bulky and large, with a design that’s quite industrial. You’ve seen the pictures, you know what they look like, and I felt self-conscious wearing them outside the house.

The cups and headband are pretty soft, yet they weren't too comfy to wear, perhaps because of their 353g weight. At least they're good at at catering for different shapes of head, thanks to how versatile they are: the cups rotate around different angles. This also makes them easily-foldable for bags, and handy to form for review pictures.

However, and likely as a natural side-effect of the size, they didn't stick in place reliably. If I was walking, they'd sway a tiny bit, and I imagine they'll wobble if you're an active DJ enjoying your own set.

Adorning each Studio Max 2 cup is a range of buttons and ports. The left cup has a 6.35mm port, while on the right you're getting volume up, volume down and power buttons, a 3.5mm jack, a slider to toggle between Bluetooth and ultra-low latency, and a USB-C port for charging too.

Two things to point out that images don't convey. Firstly, these things creak quite a bit; I'm used to this being a symptom of cheap plastic used in the design, but it doesn't feel like the case here. I think the many moving parts are to blame. Secondly, the back of the cups are grooved to resemble vinyl records; a neat touch, but if my previous pair are any indication, they can be huge dust magnets.

Design score: 3 / 5

OneOdio Studio Max 2 review: Value

(Image credit: Future)

Too expensive to be consumer cans
Value for money if you need transmitter

If you’re looking at the OneOdio Studio Max 2 as consumer-friendly headphones, it’s hard to argue that they offer you good value for money. There are great cans for music fans at a third of the price — from OneOdio itself, as well as other brands.

That’s also true if you’re looking for general studio headphones, for that matter.

What you’re paying for is the transmitter, to allow for low-latency wireless music from any source, including instruments. If you need a gadget like it, the Studio Max 2 undercuts its rivals — if not, then these aren’t the cans for you.

Value: 3.5 / 5

Should I buy the OneOdio Studio Max 2?Cleer Arc 5 score card

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Features

The app may be barebones, but the fantastic battery life and useful connection modes are a winner.

4 / 5

Sound quality

Don't buy them if you want good-sounding headphones.

2.5 / 5

Design

It's not a look that'll appeal to many, and it's not very comfy, but at least it's versatile.

3 / 5

Value

The affordable transmitter makes these good value (if that's a feature you need).

3.5 / 5

Buy them if…

You need low wireless latency
If you need headphones that connect wirelessly with minimum delay, there are few rivals, and none this cheap.

You can't charge frequently
That 120-hour battery life is hard to beat, and these things will keeping going for literal days at a time.

You need 6.35mm connection
How many headphones offer a 6.35mm port? Very few, that's how many, yet it's still useful in some music production situations.

Don’t buy them if…

You want music that sounds good
Just want cans to connect to your phone and play music? These aren't the ones.

You want something lightweight
These cans are heavy, and you can really feel them on your head. I can see some people finding them uncomfortable to wear.

OneOdio Studio Max 2 review: Also considerOther headphone brands with DJ transmitters

OneOdio Studio Max 2

AIAIAI TMA-2

AlphaTheta HDJ-F10

Drivers

45mm

40mm

Active noise cancellation

Yes

Battery life (ANC on)

120 hours

40 hours

30 hours

Weight

353g

217g

356g

Connectivity

Bluetooth 6.0

Bluetooth 5.3

Bluetooth 5.2

Waterproofing

AlphaTheta HDJ-F10
The AlphaTheta HDJ-F10 are a real premium alternative to the OneOdio, costing roughly twice as much, but they dramatically reduce latency and sound pretty good.

AIAIAI TMA-2 Wireless
These cans are much more lightweight than the alternatives, perfect if you want something easier to wear. They're pricier than the OneOdio, but not the AlphaTheta — here's our full AIAIAI TMA-2 Studio Wireless+ review.

How I tested the OneOdio Studio Max 2

Tested for one month
Tested alongside PC, guitar amp, synth, smartphone
Used all connection options

I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 for roughly a month before writing this review.

During the testing process, they were connected to a wide variety of devices including my guitar amp, my keyboard, my PC and my smartphone. Across this board, I used every connection option possible.

Mostly, the testing was done for music playback, but I also used it for a variety of other tasks including audio mixing, video editing, playing my own music and, for one weekend, audio recording alongside a field recorder and boom mic.

I've been reviewing gadgets for TechRadar since early 2019, and in that time have tested plenty of audio products including the original Studio Max 1 (the number is in the name, I've not added it!).

First reviewed in May 2026

Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

Categories: Reviews

I've tested the Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro for six weeks, and it's a powerful, premium Garmin alternative — albeit a lumpy and uncomfortable one

Mon, 06/15/2026 - 16:00

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro: One minute review

Three years after the release of the Cheetah Pro smartwatch, Amazfit has finally released its successor, the aptly named Cheetah 2 Pro. Designed for serious road runners who rely on structured training plans, the smartwatch is a solid offering that competes admirably with the best running watches on the market right now. It doesn't hit the dizzying heights of Garmin's top-range alternatives, but Amazfit has definitely closed the gap. The Cheetah 2 Pro has a bigger sibling, the Cheetah 2 Ultra, which is slightly larger, more expensive and comes with trail running profiles with gradient and terrain features not present here.

The high price tag for a watch without trail features will put a lot of people off, especially considering Amazfit is still an unknown brand to many and a budget brand to those in the know. On closer inspection, the cost is mostly justified. The bright 1.32-inch AMOLED display is super-sharp and covered with scratch-resistant sapphire crystal glass.

The display is housed in a high-end grade 5 titanium alloy case, which looks and feels premium, but the 15.6 mm thickness and large sensor bump make the watch uncomfortable to wear for long periods of time.

The Cheetah 2 Pro includes an impressive set of features, including structured training plans and AI-driven adaptive workouts. It also tracks comprehensive health data, including 24/7 heart rate, blood oxygen, and skin temperature, all making it possible to generate a daily "Readiness Score" for monitoring fatigue. The watch reaches a high level of accuracy across most tested metrics.

As you’d expect for a watch at this price, the Cheetah 2 Pro boasts offline color maps and navigation tools such as automatic rerouting and point-to-point route planning. It’s an extensive set of features, but the implementation is lacking finesse. Due to limited hardware, panning and zooming maps is laggy.

When it comes to running smartwatches, Amazfit is closing the gap on Garmin, but they’ve still got a long way to go, especially when it comes to dedicated running tools.

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro: Specifications

Component

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro

Price

$499.99 USD / £449.90 UK / $729 AUS

Dimensions

48mm wide, 15.6mm thick (inc. heart sensor)

Weight

45.6g without strap

Case/bezel

Titanium case, plastic bezel

Display

1.32-inch AMOLED Screen, 466 x 466 px resolution

GPS

Dual-band, 6 satellite systems

Battery life

Up to 10 days of heavy use, or 20 days typical

Connection

Bluetooth, BLE 5.3, Wi-Fi 2.4GHz

Water resistance

5 ATM

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro: Price and availability

$499.99 USD / £449.90 UK / $729 AUS
More affordable than the Garmin Forerunner 970
Impressive set of features for the price

The Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro costs $499.99 USD / £449.90 UK, which represents a significant 50% increase over the price of the original Cheetah Pro. Amazfit justifies this huge jump by offering high-end hardware, including a titanium bezel, sapphire crystal lens, and up to 20 days of battery life.

Its position in the market is as a budget-friendly alternative to Garmin's flagship elite tier, specifically the Garmin Forerunner 970. While both watches boast premium titanium bezels and crisp AMOLED screens, the more expensive Garmin boasts superior features, especially when it comes to offline maps and ECG functionality.

Value score 4/5

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro: Design

Premium materials and a bright AMOLED display
Touchscreen interface and physical buttons
Overly chunky design

The Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro boasts a gorgeous premium grade-5 titanium alloy case finished off with a scratch-resistant sapphire crystal glass. The 1.32-inch AMOLED display is brilliantly sharp, with an impressive 3,000 nits of peak brightness which guarantees clarity even on sunny days.

If you were wondering why the watch costs so much, the material make-up and AMOLED display are two of the reasons. Compared to the cheap, plastic feel of a lot of sports trackers, the Cheetah 2 Pro is a high-end piece of hardware, only let down by the bundled silicone strap, which feels like an ill-considered afterthought.

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)

Alongside the touchscreen interface, the watch features a four-button layout with tactile aluminum buttons. The presence of physical buttons proved valuable, in my experience, especially when using the watch with sweaty hands or in the rain.

As much as I love the design of the Cheetah 2 Pro, it's let down by its over-large 15.6mm thickness. It absolutely dwarfed my wife's smaller wrist, and due to the size and weight I found it uncomfortable to wear for long periods of time. If Amazfit could work out a way to reduce the thickness of the underside sensor bump, then a lot of these problems would go away.

Design Score: 4/5

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro: Features

Excellent structured training, especially with Zepp Flow AI
Offline maps and turn-by-turn navigation
An extensive set of sensors

At the heart of the Cheetah 2 Pro are the structured training plans and purpose-driven workouts. It's like having your own personal running coach or using a platform such as Runna, but without the ongoing cost. There are workouts and plans for half marathons, full marathons, and Fartlek runs, and every session helps extend endurance, build strength, and ensure appropriate recovery, all done via Zepp Coach AI.

In addition to dedicated training plans, the Cheetah 2 Pro boasts an extensive set of navigation features which help keep you on track, however hard you're pushing. I was pleased to see the presence of offline maps and turn guidance, and it's even possible to import courses so you can confidently navigate through routes you're not familiar with. Beyond this, the watch includes automatic rerouting, points of interest search, and point-to-point route planning.

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)

The upgraded optical sensors comprise 5 photodiodes and 2 LEDs, providing continuous 24/7 monitoring for heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and stress levels. All of these sensors, and more, feed the data so the watch can provide a daily Readiness Score for evaluating training fatigue and overall status. Additional environmental sensors include a skin temperature sensor, barometric altimeter, gyroscope, accelerometer, and geomagnetic compass.

In comparison to the Forerunner 970, the Cheetah comes up short in most areas. The Garmin features a more comprehensive set of tools, including its localized crowd-sourced popularity routing database, granular analytics, and ECG functionality. If you want the very best, Garmin is still the brand to turn to.

Features Score: 4/5

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro: Performance

Spot on GPS and heart rate performance
Excellent map functionality but a little laggy
Top-level activity tracking and health monitoring

Serious runners require accurate on-board GPS, and the Cheetah 2 Pro provides exactly that. Courtesy of its advanced positioning systems, the watch is able to deliver accurate tracking and pacing even when the signal appears to weaken. I compared it with the same route run with my accuracy benchmark, the Garmin Tactix 8, and the Huawei Watch Ultimate 2. It tracked these runs to within one or two per cent accuracy and was able to cope with varying surroundings, including high-rise buildings and forests.

Map functionality is extensive enough for most runners, although the subjective experience wasn’t perfect. Any amount of panning and zooming resulted in a stutter, and if I were cycling, the map wouldn’t update particularly smoothly. These problems are not game-changers, but if you’re after the smoothest map interactions, then the Cheetah 2 Pro doesn’t have the hardware to deliver that.

The Cheetah 2 Pro is a solid running coach on the wrist. It is able to provide specific metrics such as ground contact time, stride length, and cadence. The ability to track in real-time my VO2 Max level and running power is super-helpful to know if I am doing well (or not, as the case may be).

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)

An extensive set of health metrics is available, including heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, heart rate variability (HRV), respiration rate, lactate threshold, VO2, and more. The heart rate was an exact match to a dedicated heart rate monitor band. The heart rate zone feature is a nice addition for knowing when you’re building endurance, improving speed, or pushing too hard.

Amazfit positions the watch as a long-distance runner's dream, and that requires outstanding battery performance with every feature and setting turned on. They claim up to 31 hours with accurate GPS mode enabled, which is more than enough to perform a long-distance run, assuming it doesn't span multiple days. When you're using the watch in between trainings, you can expect up to 20 days of battery life with typical use.

The Cheetah 2 Pro is much more than a running watch, though. Its general smartwatch features are comparable with the very best from Apple, Google, and Samsung. You can make and receive Bluetooth calls, read and reply to texts, and utilize Zepp Pay for NFC contactless payments. All in, it’s a very useful watch for day-to-day living.

Performance score: 4.5/5

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro: Scorecard

Bitrix24 CRM review

Mon, 06/15/2026 - 07:59

Bitrix24 is a comprehensive customer relationship management platform that goes beyond traditional CRM functionalities. It offers an extensive suite of tools for managing customer interactions, project collaboration, and internal communication.

At its core, Bitrix24 provides robust lead and deal management capabilities, making it one of the best CRM platforms on the market - but it doesn't stop there. The platform integrates project management features, time tracking, document handling, and even website building tools.

The platform offers a generous free tier alongside paid plans, making it an attractive option for businesses of various sizes. However, this wide-ranging functionality comes with a trade-off — a steeper learning curve compared to more streamlined options.

Bitrix24 core capabilties

(Image credit: Bitrix24)

Despite being an all-in-one platform, Bitrix24 offers a robust collection of core CRM capabilities. I was able to create and organize detailed profiles for both individual contacts and company accounts, complete with customizable fields to capture specific information relevant to my hypothetical business needs.

I could also effortlessly track prospects from initial contact through the entire sales process. The system allowed me to assign leads to team members, set follow-up tasks, and monitor the progress of each opportunity through customizable sales pipelines.

For sales forecasting, the visual pipeline view provided an intuitive representation of deals at various stages, allowing for quick assessment of the sales funnel. I found the ability to drag and drop deals between stages particularly useful for keeping the pipeline up to date. The forecasting tools, while not as advanced as dedicated forecasting software, offered solid projections based on historical data.

The platform offers a wide array of pre-built reports covering various aspects of sales performance, lead sources, and team productivity. I was able to generate custom reports with relative ease, though some of the more advanced reporting features were reserved for higher-tier plans. The visual representation of data through charts and graphs made it simple to glean insights at a glance, which would be invaluable for quick decision-making in a real-world scenario.

While testing Bitrix24’s mobile app, I found that it offered most of the core CRM functionalities available on the desktop version. I could access contact information, update deals, and even use the built-in communication tools while on the go. The app's interface, while not as polished as some standalone mobile CRMs, was functional and responsive.

I particularly liked Bitrix24's integration of communication tools directly within the CRM. The platform includes features like internal chat, video calls, and a social intranet, which could significantly streamline team collaboration. Any internal conversations about leads or deals can happen right alongside the relevant CRM data, making collaboration more secure and user-friendly.

Being an advanced platform, Bitrix24 offers a range of tools to streamline repetitive tasks. The system allows for the creation of custom workflows and triggers, which can automate actions like assigning tasks, sending emails, or updating deal stages based on specific criteria. While powerful, I did find that setting up complex automations required a bit of a learning curve.

The platform also includes features that extend beyond traditional CRM boundaries, such as project management tools, time tracking, and even some features to rival the best website builder platforms. While this comprehensive approach could be advantageous for businesses looking to consolidate a software stack, it also means higher costs that won’t be feasible for those looking for a standalone CRM.

How easy is Bitrix24 CRM to use?

Logging into Bitrix24, I quickly realized that ease of use is a complex topic for this platform. While the customization options are extensive, this flexibility comes at the cost of initial complexity. For starters, Bitrix24’s dashboard presents a wealth of information, which can be daunting for new users. I found myself spending considerable time navigating through various menus and submenus to locate specific functions.

Personalizing the workspace required a deeper understanding of the system's structure, which might not be immediately intuitive for all users. The ability to create custom fields, workflows, and even modify the layout is powerful, but it also contributes to a steeper learning curve.

Still, Bitrix24's approach to user interface design has evolved over time. Recent updates have made strides in improving usability, with a more streamlined layout and clearer iconography. Despite these improvements, I found that the platform's all-in-one nature sometimes leads to a cluttered feel, with features from different modules intersecting in ways that can be confusing for newcomers.

Thankfully, there’s a wealth of self-service resources available for new users. During my research, I discovered an extensive library of video tutorials on the platform’s YouTube channel, as well as detailed online training courses specifically designed for administrators. These resources are comprehensive and cover a wide range of topics, from basic navigation to advanced feature utilization. Bitrix24 also offers weekly webinars that dive into different aspects of the platform, providing detailed use cases.

Ultimately, compared to some of its competitors, Bitrix24's learning curve is way steeper. Platforms like Freshworks, for instance, are noted for their user-friendly interfaces and ease of use. While this is partly explained by the wealth of features and customization choices available, the fact remains that there are competitors who do all of this while still retaining their intuitiveness, like Insightly.

Bitrix24 integrations

(Image credit: Bitrix24)

When it comes to integrations, I was impressed by the variety of options available in the Bitrix24 Marketplace. With over 300 apps in the catalog, including integrations with well-known services like Quickbooks, Google Sheets, PayPal, RingCentral, WhatsApp, and Miro, businesses can easily connect existing tools with the CRM.

For businesses looking to migrate data from other platforms, Bitrix24 also offers a range of migration apps for popular services like Jira, Asana, Trello, Zapier, Zoho, and Pipedrive. During CRM testing, I found these migration tools to be intuitive and efficient, allowing for a smooth transition without significant data loss or disruption.

Then there’s the Bitrix24 REST API, which allows developers to integrate the platform with external systems, import and export data, and even create custom widgets. It provides businesses with the flexibility to tailor the CRM to specific needs by ensuring smooth data synchronization with other tools in the software stack.

Bitrix24's commitment to integration extends beyond pre-built apps and API access. The platform also provides comprehensive documentation and resources for developers looking to create custom integrations. The detailed REST API guide, complete with examples and guidelines, empowers businesses to develop tailored solutions that address their unique requirements.

Moreover, Bitrix24 offers a range of low-code tools that allow users to solve specific problems without relying solely on the REST API. This approach democratizes integration capabilities, enabling even non-technical users to connect and automate processes involving other applications.

How good is Bitrix24 CRM customer support?

(Image credit: Bitrix24)

Looking into Bitrix24's customer support, I encountered a mixed bag of experiences and resources. The platform offers several support channels, but the level of assistance and response times varied depending on the plan and the complexity of the issue at hand.

Free accounts are limited to self-support resources such as product manuals, helpdesk articles, video tutorials, and free webinars. While these resources can be helpful for getting started and troubleshooting basic issues, they may not suffice for more complex or account-specific problems. But this is not unusual, since most platforms reserve live support options for paid customers only.

For paid users, Bitrix24 offers live support through chat and email. Chat support is usually responsive with average wait times of around 5-10 minutes. Support representatives are generally knowledgeable and helpful, although there are instances where more complex issues require escalation to higher-tier support agents, resulting in longer resolution times.

Email support, on the other hand, has slower response times. It often takes up to 24-48 hours to receive an initial response, which could be frustrating for users facing time-sensitive issues. However, once engaged, the email support team provides detailed and thorough assistance, often including step-by-step instructions and screenshots.

Beyond the live support options, the platform offers an extensive knowledge base with articles covering a wide range of topics, from basic setup and configuration to advanced customization and integrations. The articles are well-organized and searchable, making it easy to find relevant information quickly.

In addition to the knowledge base, Bitrix24 provides a comprehensive library of video tutorials and webinars. These resources offer visual guidance on various aspects of the platform, making it easier for users to learn and adopt the system. The webinars, in particular, are a valuable resource, as they provide live demonstrations and Q&A sessions with Bitrix24 experts.

Yet, some users on sites like G2 and Trustpilot have reported mixed experiences with Bitrix24's customer support. In online reviews, a few users expressed frustration with the support team's response times and the quality of assistance provided. Some felt that the support representatives were more focused on providing formal replies rather than solving problems, leaving customers to figure things out on their own.

It's also worth noting that Bitrix24 does not provide phone support as a standard channel. For users who prefer to discuss issues over the phone, this could be a drawback. However, the platform does offer a callback feature, where users can request a phone call from the support team at a scheduled time.

Bitrix24 CRM pricing and plans

Plan

Free

Basic

Standard

Professional

Price

$0/month

$61/month

$124/month

$249/month+

Best for

Startups and small teams

Small businesses and sales teams

Advanced sales and process automation

Features

Up to 12 users; 5 GB storage; Basic CRM

Up to 5 users; 24 GB storage; CRM with invoicing

Up to 50 users; 100 GB storage; Expanded CRM tools

Up to 100 users; 1024 GB storage; Full CRM suite

Limitations

Limited CRM and storage

User and storage limits

User and some feature limits

Higher price point

Bitrix24 may just be one of the most flexible and affordable options in the CRM market. What immediately caught my attention was the platform's unique approach to pricing – instead of charging per user, it offers a flat fee for each plan with a base number of users, with the option to add more as you scale. This allows businesses to scale a user base without incurring as much expense.

Bitrix24 offers one of the best free CRM plans on the market with unlimited users and no time restrictions. It includes essential CRM features, task management, and document management capabilities, providing a solid foundation for businesses to get started with the platform - making it one of the best CRMs for start ups. While certain advanced features and paid support options aren’t available, it’s still a great option for those looking for an extended trial period.

For organizations requiring more advanced features, Bitrix24 offers four paid plans: Basic, Standard, Professional, and Enterprise. These plans range from $61/month for 5 users to $499+/month, with scaling levels of storage space and feature sets. What I found particularly impressive was the value Bitrix24 offers relative to its price. Compared to other CRM providers that charge per user, Bitrix24's flat-fee model can lead to significant cost savings for businesses with larger teams.

For all new users, Bitrix24 offers a 15-day free trial for the Professional plan. This trial allows businesses to test the platform's full range of features before committing to a paid subscription. During my experience with the trial, I found it to be a valuable way to explore Bitrix24's capabilities and determine if it was the right fit for my needs.

It's worth noting that while Bitrix24's pricing is generally straightforward, there are some limitations to keep in mind. For example, the free plan, while generous in terms of user count, does have restrictions on storage space and certain advanced features. Additionally, some features, such as the telephony functionality, require a separate payment. But overall, I found Bitrix24's pricing model to be one of its strongest selling points.

How we tested bitrix24

At TechRadar Pro, we go beyond marketing hype and basic product specifications. To provide an authentic, hands-on evaluation of Bitrix24, our B2B software experts put the platform through a structured testing methodology designed to simulate real-world business environments. Whenever we're testing CRM software, we examine the same criteria: core capabilities, ease of use, integrations, customer support, value for money, and the company trajectory.

Because modern platforms are moving heavily toward automated operations, our testing process includes a rigorous evaluation of Bitrix24’s native CoPilot AI infrastructure. We didn't just test basic text transformations; we evaluated the tool's accuracy when auto-summarizing raw audio transcripts from phone calls, tested its natural tone when prompting AI email drafts, and evaluated its predictive logic when analyzing historical pipeline velocity to assign conversion scores to open leads.

Bitrix24 CRM review: Summary

Bitrix24 particularly excels in its core functionality, offering a comprehensive suite of features that cater to the needs of any business looking for a CRM. The platform's extensive customization options and powerful automation tools enable users to streamline workflows and adapt the system to unique requirements, while its flat-rate, organization-wide pricing structure makes it a great cost-saver for larger teams. However, its wealth of features does come with a learning curve, which may be steeper for users unfamiliar with all-in-one business management platforms.

While it is perfect for growing organizations that have dedicated technical administrators to configure its extensive feature set, smaller teams looking for a simple, out-of-the-box pipeline tool will find its cluttered interface more overwhelming than intuitive. Overall, I’d say this is a powerful and versatile platform that offers a compelling blend of features, flexibility, and affordability. However, for users looking for a simple solution with great support, Bitrix24 may not be it.

Categories: Reviews

With the second-gen Ring Battery Video Doorbell Plus, the head-to-toe doorbell finally goes 2K

Sun, 06/14/2026 - 14:00

Ring Battery Video Doorbell Plus (2nd Gen): two-minute review

A video doorbell is a parcel monitor, a deterrent, and a low-key surveillance node pointed at your own front step, and Ring has spent the better part of a decade making that proposition feel normal.

The second-generation Battery Doorbell Plus is the company sharpening its best idea: taking the head-to-toe doorbell and giving it the resolution it always deserved.

Where ordinary doorbells frame a visitor's torso and chin and little else, the Plus shows a tall, square 1:1 field of view — 140 degrees in both directions — that takes in the person, the doorstep and whatever's been left on it.

This generation shoots in 2K Retinal resolution (1920 x 1920) with HDR, so you can identify a courier, read a label and confirm whether the parcel is on your step or your neighbour's — and a 6x Enhanced Zoom lets you pinch in without the image collapsing. It's the spec that separates a useful doorbell from a novelty, and the upgrade that justifies picking the Plus over Ring's cheaper Battery Doorbell.

(Image credit: Future)

Night performance has been rethought, too. Rather than dropping straight to grey mush after dark, the Plus uses true-color low-light sight to hold onto colour in dim conditions, only switching to adaptive black-and-white night vision once it's dark.

Two-way talk with noise cancellation does the doorstep-conversation job cleanly. The other quality-of-life change is the Quick Release Battery Pack: instead of unmounting the whole unit to charge, you pop out the battery, recharge it and slot it back.

Installation takes under 30 minutes, connecting to Wi-Fi through the app and mounting with the supplied tools, then lining it up so the head-to-toe view actually reaches the floor. No hub required. If there's a grumble, it's a small one: in 2026, a $179.99 / £149.99 / AU$249 doorbell still charges over Micro-USB rather than USB-C, so you'll be hunting for the right cable.

(Image credit: Future)

On the upside, it runs dual-band Wi-Fi 6, so a 2K stream holds up better than Ring's older 2.4GHz-only doorbells, with Ring recommending a 10Mbps upload to keep it smooth.

Then there's the Ring tax, in two senses. Financially, person alerts, package alerts and saved recordings all live behind a Ring subscription; without one, the doorbell is reduced to real-time alerts and live view, which rather undersells a 2K camera.

Philosophically, buying Ring means accepting its history of police-data partnerships and the broader unease about Amazon-owned cameras pointed at public pavements. None of that is new, and none of it stops the hardware being good, but a review that ignored it wouldn't be doing its job.

Ring Battery Video Doorbell Plus (2nd Gen): price & availability

List price: $179.99 / £149.99 / AU$249
Announced March 2026
Available in the UK, US, and Australia

Sitting in the upper-middle of Ring's range of video doorbells, the Plus costs more than the $99.99 / £79.99 / $149 standard Battery Doorbell and less than the $249.99 / £219.99 / AU$399 Battery Doorbell Pro, which steps up to Retinal 4K and 3D motion detection.

With a list price of $179.99 / £149.99 / AU$249, the Battery Video Doorbell Plus isn't an impulse buy, but Ring discounts aggressively and its doorbells routinely sell well under list, so few people pay full price for long.

You should also factor the subscription into the lifetime cost. Plans start affordably for a single device and climb for multi-device households. Although the doorbell functions without a subscription, the experience is hollow: you'll be notified that something happened without being able to review what. Treat the subscription as part of the purchase, not an optional extra, and the value equation looks honest.

Value score: 4/5

Ring Battery Video Doorbell Plus (2nd Gen): subscription plans

Features such as instant notifications, Live View and Two-Way Talk are available out of the box and for free on all Ring devices. A Ring subscription (branded Ring Protect) allows you to review, save and share your videos.

With a Ring subscription, starting from $4.99 / £4.99 / AU$4.95 per month per device, you can store unlimited Ring footage in the cloud for up to 180 days, to rewatch, download to your own device or share with friends and family. Person and package alerts also require a subscription.

You get a 30-day trial subscription when you first set up your Ring device. Video storage defaults to 30 days, with the option to extend it to up to 180 days.

Ring Battery Video Doorbell Plus (2nd Gen): specs

Type

Battery-powered video doorbell

Resolution

2K Retinal (1920 x 1920) HDR

Zoom

6x Enhanced Zoom (digital)

View

Head-to-toe, 1:1 aspect ratio

Field of view

140 degrees horizontal x 140 degrees vertical

Night vision

True-colour low-light sight; adaptive black-and-white in darkness

Audio

Two-way talk with noise cancellation

Motion detection

Customizable Motion Zones

Power

Quick release battery pack (rechargeable, removable); Micro-USB charging cable included; hardwire for trickle charge (8–24VAC); solar compatible

Connectivity

Wi-Fi 6, dual-band; 10Mbps upload recommended

Smart detection

Person and package alerts (Ring subscription required)

Storage

Cloud; defaults to 30 days, extendable to 180 days with subscription

Smart home

Amazon Alexa

Weather resistance

IP55

Finish

Nickel Silver (UK/US/Aus); Polished Night Navy, Polished Mocha, Polished Sandstone (US only)

Dimensions

6.6 x 2.1 x 1.4 inches. / 16.73 x 5.35 x 3.6cm

Ring Battery Video Doorbell Plus (2nd Gen): design

Well-built
Quick-release battery
Hub-free wireless install

I’ve never been the biggest fan of Ring’s bulky designs, but the second-gen Plus is a bit more suitably restrained: a slim, rounded slab that won't embarrass a period porch or a new-build alike.

Build quality is reassuring, and the button has a satisfying press, though for UK and Australian customers it only comes in a single Nickel Silver finish, so there's no matching it to your door furniture the way some rivals allow.

(Image credit: Future)

The most practical design feature is the Quick Release Battery Pack. On older Ring doorbells, recharging meant unscrewing and removing the whole device — exactly the sort of faff that leads to a flat battery and a fortnight of excuses. Here you release the battery alone, charge it and reinsert it, with the doorbell staying put.

Buy a spare — the standard pack or the new Quick Release Ultra Battery Pack — and downtime drops to seconds. If a permanent supply suits you better, it hardwires to existing doorbell wiring for continuous trickle charging.

FutureFuture

Setup follows Ring's well-worn path through the app, and crucially needs no separate hub or bridge. The only thing to get right is the angle: head-to-toe view only delivers its full benefit if you mount the doorbell so the frame reaches the doorstep, so it's worth spending a minute on placement rather than slapping it up at eye level out of habit.

Design score: 4/5

Ring Battery Video Doorbell Plus (2nd Gen): performance

2K Retinal head-to-toe view
True-colour low-light
Subscription gates smartest features

Fitted to a typical front door, the Plus does the important things well, and the move to 2K makes the difference obvious. The higher resolution and tall, square frame capture a visitor from hairline to doormat, so you see the face and the parcel in one shot.

The 6x Enhanced Zoom lets you crop in on a label or a face without the picture completely falling apart. Motion alerts arrived promptly during testing, live view loaded quickly, and two-way talk was clear enough to hold a proper exchange with a courier rather than barking over each other.

FutureFuture

It might split opinion, but Ring uses AI-powered features to identify and announce who is at your door. Instead of generic motion alerts, I received AI prompts such as “A person is walking in the room with a vacuum cleaner”. I loved it, my cleaner hated it, and well, I guess that’s the point.

After dark, true-color low-light sight holds onto color under external lighting, so a late-night clip is worth reviewing; only in near-total darkness does it fall back to adaptive black-and-white.

FutureFutureFuture

It’s worth noting that I tested this sample on an internal front door, but one with intermittent infrared communal lighting at night, so the low-light functionality became incredibly useful when the lights cut out. Being battery-powered and available with Ring’s additional adhesive stick-on mounting kit makes it suitable for rental properties, too.

Connectivity is more of a quiet improvement: dual-band Wi-Fi 6 gives the 2K stream more headroom than Ring's older 2.4GHz-only doorbells, with Ring recommending a 10Mbps upload speed to keep things smooth.

FutureFutureFutureFutureFuture

The performance ceiling, though, is set by the subscription. Person and package alerts — the difference between 'motion detected' and 'a parcel has arrived' — require a Ring plan, as does the ability to go back and watch what you missed, with recordings held up to 180 days.

Without a plan, the doorbell still rings and still streams live, but it stops short of the intelligence its hardware is clearly capable of. As a generational upgrade, it's a real one: 2K Retinal, HDR, sharper zoom and better low-light all land, so first-gen Plus owners have a genuine reason to look, even if a working 1536p unit is still perfectly serviceable.

Performance score: 4/5

Should you buy the Ring Battery Video Doorbell Plus (2nd Gen)Ring Battery Video Doorbell Plus (2nd Gen) score card

Attribute

Notes

Score

Value

Strong, sharper hardware at a fair price, but the subscription is effectively mandatory for the full experience.

4/5

Design

Tidy and well-made, with a quick-release battery that improves daily life, though it comes in a single finish outside of the US.

4/5

Performance

Sharp 2K Retinal head-to-toe video with capable low-light sight, with the smartest alerts behind a paywall.

4/5

Buy it if

You want to see parcels and people in one frame

Head-to-toe view is the feature, now in 2K, and it's the most practical thing a doorbell can offer.

You're tired of recharging hassle

The quick-release battery pack and an optional spare all but eliminate doorbell downtime.

You already use Amazon smart home devices

If you have an Echo Show on the kitchen counter, this slots straight in and answers when you ask.

Don't buy it if

You won't pay for a subscription

Without a Ring plan, you lose package and person alerts and recorded footage, which guts the proposition.

You're uneasy about Ring's track record

If Amazon-owned doorbells and their data and policing history give you pause, a Matter-friendly rival may sit easier.

You need the absolute best image

If you want Retinal 4K and 3D motion detection, the £219.99 (about $290 / AU$420) Battery Doorbell Pro is the one to stretch for.

Ring Battery Video Doorbell Plus (2nd Gen): also consider

If you're not sure whether the new Ring Battery Video Doorbell Plus is the right option for you, here are two other doorbells to think about.

Ring Battery Video Doorbell (2nd Gen)

At £79.99 (about $110 / AU$150), the Pro's cheaper sibling now also shoots Retinal 2K with a head-to-toe view; drop to it if you want the Ring experience for less and can live with a built-in, non-removable battery and simpler colour night vision.

Google Nest Doorbell (battery)

The obvious non-Ring alternative, with on-device intelligence and a little free event history, if you'd rather not commit to Ring's ecosystem.

How I tested the Ring Battery Video Doorbell Plus (2nd Gen)

Tested at a domestic front door
Assessed video, head-to-toe framing, zoom, night vision and audio
Trialled the subscription experience

I used the doorbell outside to assess image quality, but mainly mounted the doorbell on an internal front door and used it as my main entry camera, paying particular attention to whether the head-to-toe view and the new 2K sensor delivered on the promise of capturing parcels and people together.

I checked live-view responsiveness, pushed the 6x zoom on faces and labels, held two-way conversations with visitors, and reviewed low-light and night clips after dark.

I've reported on Ring's privacy considerations because they're a material part of the buying decision, not a footnote.

For more details, see how we test, rate, and review products at TechRadar.

First reviewed June 2026

Categories: Reviews

The Yale Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite is a clever, affordable Matter lock with no subscription fee, but a few rough edges

Sun, 06/14/2026 - 03:00

Yale Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite: two-minute review

Smart locks in Britain have always been the awkward cousin of the smart home. American buyers get deadbolts and endless choice; we get multipoint mechanisms, lift-to-lock handles and a nagging sense that retrofitting anything to the front door will either void the insurance or fall off.

Yale's answer with the Linus L2 Lite is to keep things small, cheap and reversible — and, crucially, to build in Matter over Thread so the lock works with whatever smart home system you already rock.

The L2 Lite is a compact, round-knob unit that mounts on the inside of your door over the existing thumb-turn. Your key still works from the outside, which matters both for emergencies and for landlords.

The Yale Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite is easy to install. fitting over your existing lock cylinder (Image credit: Future)

Inside the Yale Home app, you get the modern smart-lock toolkit: digital keys and PIN codes you can share and revoke, an activity feed of who came and went, Auto-Unlock that opens the door as you approach with your phone in your pocket, and KeySense — a button on the knob for a quick press-to-lock or a long-press delayed lock as you leave.

Because it supports Matter over Thread alongside Bluetooth 5.4, the L2 Lite joins Apple Home, Google Home, Amazon Alexa or Samsung SmartThings locally and responds fast, no Yale-specific bridge required — provided you already own a device that acts as a Thread border router, such as a recent Apple HomePod or Amazon Echo.

The lock uses three CR123A batteries, which aren't a type you'll typically have to hand (Image credit: Future)

If you don't live in a Matter ecosystem and still want to lock the door from the pub, you'll need Yale's optional ConnectX Wi-Fi Bridge, sold separately. There's no Wi-Fi baked in, unlike the pricier Linus L2.

Living with it, the L2 Lite is reassuringly unremarkable in the best way. Installation took 15 minutes, it disappears against the door, and KeySense quickly becomes muscle memory.

It runs on three CR123A batteries — not the sort of cell you keep in a kitchen drawer. There's no USB-C top-up, and it lacks DoorSense, so it knows whether it's locked but not whether the door is actually shut.

There's no Apple Home Key tap-to-enter either, which makes sense for an interior-only design but will disappoint iPhone devotees.

Get past the spec-sheet gaps, and the bigger question is door compatibility, because this is where UK smart locks live or die, and the L2 Lite is fussier than its friendly styling suggests.

Yale Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite: price & availability

List price £129.98 (about $170 / AU$250) compared to £220 (about $290 / AU$420) for the regular Linus L2
Launched December 2025
Available in black or silver

With a list price of £129.98 (about $170 / AU$250), the Yale Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite undercuts the standard Linus L2 by a meaningful margin while keeping most of the day-to-day features. That makes it one of the cheapest routes to a Matter-over-Thread smart lock in the UK, though at the time of writing it's not available worldwide.

Pleasingly, there are no subscription fees to concern yourself with, but there are some other cost caveats.

CR123A batteries are included, and Yale rates them for up to six months, but replacing them is more expensive and less convenient than AAs. Second, if you're not in a Matter household, the ConnectX Wi-Fi Bridge is effectively mandatory for remote control, setting you back another £70.

Reassuringly, pairing the lock with a Yale Platinum Three Star cylinder brings a £3,000 Total Trust Guarantee if it's ever breached. That compares to £5,000 offered by smart lock rival Ultion Nuki. Its base model, the Ultion Nuki Go, costs £239 with Wi-Fi built in.

Value score: 4/5

Yale Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite: specs

Type

Retrofit interior smart lock (round knob)

Connectivity

Matter over Thread, Bluetooth 5.4

Remote access

Via Matter ecosystem, or optional Yale ConnectX Wi-Fi Bridge

Power

3x CR123A batteries (included), up to six months

Security

128-bit AES encryption

Features

KeySense, Auto-Unlock, digital keys, PIN sharing, activity feed; pairs with Yale Smart Keypad 2/Yale Dot

Dimensions (H x W x D)

2.4 x 2.4 x 2.8 inches / 6.1 x 6.1 x 7.2cm

Weight (without batteries)

9.2oz / 260g

Finishes

Black / silver

Yale Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite: design and installation

Compact design
Reversible install
Door compatibility tricky

For something doing a serious security job, the L2 Lite is endearingly low-key. It's a small round knob in black or silver that sits on the inside of the door over your existing thumb-turn, and from the outside, there's no sign anything has changed.

The casing is plastic, which sounds cheap but feels solid enough in the hand. Installation lives up to the drill-free promise. In my case, I was carrying over an Ultion cylinder left in the door from a previous smart-lock install, and the supplied two-piece thumb-turn adapter eventually made the swap painless.

The thumb-turn adapter makes installation painless (Image credit: Future)

Fix the mounting plate around the cylinder, clip the adapter over the thumb-turn, attach the lock and calibrate it in the app. Because nothing is drilled and the cylinder isn't replaced, it comes off just as cleanly if you're renting or wary of committing.

The catch is what counts as a compatible door. The L2 Lite works only with lift-to-lock mechanisms; your cylinder needs to protrude at least 3mm on the inside, and it explicitly won't work with split spindles or auto-engage multipoint locks.

Bear in mind that Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite only works with lift-to-lock doors (Image credit: Future)

Plenty of UK front doors are lift-to-lock multipoint and will be fine; a meaningful number aren't. Use Yale's online compatibility checker before you buy, and note that if your current cylinder doesn't fit the bill, Yale's Linus Adjustable Cylinder is designed to solve exactly that.

Design and installation score: 4/5

Yale Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite: performance

Fast operation
KeySense and Auto-Unlock useful
Battery and DoorSense omissions niggle

Day to day, the L2 Lite locks and unlocks reliably, on command, without fuss. Paired into a Matter home, it responded quickly to app and voice commands, and Auto-Unlock greeted me at the door as advertised, sensing my approach over Bluetooth.

KeySense, the press-to-operate button on the knob, turns out to be the feature I used most: a quick press to lock behind me, a long press for a delayed lock as I gathered bags and left. One practical wrinkle on lift-to-lock doors: you still need to lift the handle as you leave, or KeySense has nothing to throw the bolts into.

FutureFuture

Matter over Thread is always appealing, and it works. Through Apple Home, the lock appeared as a native tile, automations fired, and there was no bridge-dependent lag.

Sharing access is painless — digital keys and PIN codes go out to family or a cleaner and can be revoked from the app, with an activity feed confirming who came and went.

Want a code or fingerprint on the door rather than a phone? It pairs with the additional Yale Smart Keypad 2 or the Yale Dot.

FutureFuture

The motor isn't silent, throwing a businesslike whir as it turns the cylinder, though it's no louder than rivals. The omissions are what stop a higher score. The lack of DoorSense means it reports whether it's locked, but has no idea whether the door is actually closed, which undermines the 'Is the house secure?' peace of mind.

The CR123A batteries are a recurring irritation rather than a dealbreaker, and the absence of Apple Home Key means no tap-to-enter with an iPhone or Apple Watch from outside. None of it spoils the core experience; it merely reaffirms this isn’t the flagship.

Performance score: 4/5

Should you buy the Yale Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite?

Attribute

Notes

Score

Value

One of the cheapest Matter-over-Thread locks in the UK, with batteries and an optional bridge to factor in.

4/5

Design

Compact, discreet and genuinely drill-free, let down only by fussy door compatibility.

4/5

Performance

Fast, reliable Matter operation with handy KeySense, held back by no DoorSense or Home Key.

4/5

Buy it if

You rent or don't want to alter your door

The drill-free, reversible install keeps your existing key and cylinder and comes off without a trace.

You already run a Matter smart home

With a Thread border router on hand, it works hub-free across Apple Home, Google, Alexa and SmartThings.

You want smart access on a budget

It's among the most affordable ways into a credible Matter-over-Thread lock right now.

Don't buy it if

You want remote access without extra kit

No Matter ecosystem means buying the ConnectX Wi-Fi Bridge to lock up from afar.

You expect DoorSense or Apple Home Key

This lock knows its own state but not the door's, and there's no tap-to-enter.

Your door isn't lift-to-lock

Split spindles and auto-engage multipoint locks aren't supported — check compatibility before committing.

Yale Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite: also consider

If you're not sure whether the Yale Linus Smart Lock L2 is the right smart lock for your home, here are two others to bear in mind.

Yale Linus Smart Lock L2

The dearer flagship (around £220 list price, often discounted) adds built-in Wi-Fi, a rechargeable battery and quieter, faster operation — worth the premium if the L2 Lite's gaps bother you.

Aqara U200 Lite

A keen Matter-over-Thread rival with a rechargeable battery, aimed at similar European doors. The company makes lovely video doorbells, too.

How I tested the Yale Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite

Installed on a domestic door
Tested via Matter, Bluetooth and the Yale Home app
Assessed installation, daily reliability, KeySense, and Auto-Unlock

I fitted the L2 Lite myself to gauge how true the drill-free claim is, swapping it onto an Ultion cylinder already in the door via the supplied two-piece thumb-turn adapter. I lived with it as a daily lock, locking and unlocking by app, voice and the KeySense button.

I paired it with Matter to test hub-free operation and response times, and used Auto-Unlock on repeated approaches. I shared and revoked digital access, checked the activity feed, and paid particular attention to the consequences of the missing DoorSense and the CR123A battery choice. Battery longevity can't be verified in weeks, so I've reported Yale's six-month figure alongside my shorter-term experience rather than guessing. For more details, see how we test, rate, and review products at TechRadar.

First reviewed June 2026

Categories: Reviews

I tested a cheap PS Portal case with a molded interior, charging cable passthrough, and a super-durable build — and it’s become a permanent part of my portable gaming setup

Sat, 06/13/2026 - 20:00

PowerA Protection Case for PS Portal review

The PowerA Protection Case for PlayStation Portal is designed to keep your beloved remote player protected from scratches, drops, bolts of lightning…you name it. OK, I was lying about that last one, but this case is a very durable option indeed, and during my two weeks testing it, it’s proved to be a highly reliable carry case — here’s why.

First of all, let’s talk about the case’s exterior. This is a hard case, so it’s not the most flexible or anything, but it’s very resistant to damage of all kinds. When dropping the case, scratching it, throwing it in a bag, it didn’t show any signs of wear whatsoever.

The case’s interior is also well optimized for damage-prevention in a number of key ways. First of all, the inside is molded to your remote player, enabling it to securely slot into place. There’s also a couple of hook-and-loop straps, which keep it fastened when you’re on the go. On top of that, you’ll find a padded screen-protector flap for preventing scratches. There are so many layers of protection here, enabling this model to compete with some of the very best PS5 accessories.

This screen-shielding flap does even more, though. That’s right, it also has a mesh flap on the top side, which is excellent for storing small accessories. I found it very useful for storing cables and wireless earbuds, for instance, making it easy to take plenty of gaming gear on the go. Sure, there’s no room for a headset or anything large, but this case is meant to fall on the more minimalist side.

(Image credit: Future)

While some may still find PowerA's case to be on the bulky side — I found the Venom Carry Case for PlayStation Portal to have a more modest footprint — this model is still very portable, and it easily fits in my work bag alongside my laptop, Nintendo Switch 2, and Sony WH-1000XM6.

Something else worth mentioning is the inclusion of a cable passthrough feature. There’s a tab on the underside of the case that you can insert a USB-C cable into and charge up your Portal, even when it’s boxed away. This is very convenient, and I used it to safely charge my system in my bag, with it connected up to a power bank.

Before we wrap up, let’s talk looks. This model is available in either Black or White, and I used the latter variant. This looks incredibly on-brand for the Portal — and indeed the PS5 — retaining that fairly futuristic aesthetic. My only complaint in terms of the look would be the fabric handle, which appears a little cheap in comparison to the rest of the case. But this can be forgiven for a case that only costs $34.99 / £19.99 / AU$49.95.

So, is the PowerA Protection Case for PlayStation Portal worth the money? Absolutely. It’s relatively rugged, it’s well-priced, and it even looks the part. The molded interior and screen-protecting flap keep your remote player safe and secure, and the cable passthrough feature is something you won’t get on every case out there. Therefore, it’s an easy recommendation from me.

(Image credit: Future)PowerA Protection Case for PS Portal review: price & specs

Price

$34.99 / £19.99 / AU$49.95

Dimensions

7.7 x 13 x 3in / 195 x 330 x 75mm

Weight

1lb / 440g

Compartments

Handle

Yes

Color

Black or White

(Image credit: Future)Should I buy the PowerA Protection Case for PS Portal?

Attributes

Notes

Score

Design

Neat look, molded interior, cable passthrough, protective flap, handle could be better though.

4.5/5

Storage

Plenty of room for small accessories, Portal itself, but nothing too large.

4/5

Value

A very reasonable price for a great case overall.

4.5/5

Buy it if…

You want to protect your Portal for less
Something that I absolutely loved about PowerA’s case was its low price. For just $34.99 / £19.99 / AU$49.95, you get a very reliable, durable case that’s sure to keep your Portal safe.

You’re looking for charging cable passthrough
If you want to charge your Portal on the go, then having cable passthrough is a pretty great feature. You can keep your remote player safe, juice it up, and keep on moving without any worries.

Don’t buy it if…

You want loads of room for accessories
Although this case has room for a cable and some earbuds, say, it’s still on the more compact side. So don’t expect to fit a headset or any larger accessories in here.

You’re searching for something with a premium look
Although the PowerA Protection Case is on-brand for the Portal, and looks pretty solid for its price, it’s not exactly the most luxurious. It has a relatively cheap handle, and there are more swanky, higher-priced options for those who want something ultra-classy.

PowerA Protection Case for PS Portal review: also consider

Spigen Rugged Armor Pro
We’re big fans of the Spigen Rugged Armor Pro here at TechRadar. It features a whole lot of storage space, it’s hard as nails, and it keeps your system incredibly secure. It’s a little pricey, with a $54.99 / £28.99 / AU$134.99 list price, but we think the quality on offer makes it worth the investment.

See our full thoughts on the Spigen Rugged Armor Pro.

How I tested the PowerA Protection Case for PS Portal

(Image credit: Future)

Used the case for multiple weeks
Directly compared against other models
Tested by a seasoned gaming accessories reviewer

I spent weeks testing the PowerA Protection Case for PlayStation Portal, taking it with me just about everywhere I went throughout the process. While testing, I made sure to try stuffing various accessories in the case and also try out the cable passthrough feature.

To test the case’s durability, I tried dropping it from a controlled height, performed some scratch tests, and reviewed wear and tear after the testing period concluded. I also assessed it against rivals, including the Venom Carry Case for PlayStation Portal, on factors such as robustness and storage space.

More generally, I’ve been reviewing all kinds of gadgets at TechRadar for more than two years. I’ve tested a whole lot of gaming accessories, including cases like the Nintendo Switch 2 All-In-One Carrying Case and screen protectors, such as the Genki Aegis Shield.

Read TechRadar’s reviews guarantee
First reviewed: June 2026

Categories: Reviews

'I really love the way the Cinema Mini sounds': I tested Bluesound's latest small soundbar, and it's the best compact options for audio quality — but the price puts it in dangerous territory

Sat, 06/13/2026 - 13:00

Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini: Two minute review

I came to this Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini with admitted baggage. I’m not gonna sugarcoat it; I did not like Bluesound’s original Pulse Soundbar. It had an awkward design, it sounded cold and clinical, and it was very expensive when compared to alternative products.

The Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini is company’s latest model, and is still on the pricey side, but where its predecessor disappointed, the Cinema Mini impresses. There's powerful, rich, and detailed sound, an elegant design that will complement most rooms, and a wealth of features you won’t find from brands like Sonos and Bose.

Like any Dolby Atmos soundbar that tries to do immersive, 3D sound with only two channels, the Pulse Cinema Mini can’t quite deliver on the promise of overhead height channel effects, but it makes up for it with a surprisingly wide soundstage that brings Atmos and 5.1 movies to life, and does wonders for stereo.

Though physically wider than most “mini” soundbars, that's clearly enabling its biggest strength: it gives the speaker room to house a set of woofers that deliver much bolder low-end bass than the compact category is known for.

This puts the Pulse Cinema Mini in a tricky spot for buyers. It’s priced higher than many full-sized soundbars, yet it can’t quite match the performance of those larger speakers. It’s highly versatile, yet it may be too big for truly small setups.

These contradictions mean the Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini isn't a no-brainer-just-buy-it product, but there’s also no doubt in my mind that if you put a high value on the things it well, you’ll be thrilled with it in your home.

Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini review: Price and release date

Release date: August 27, 2025
Price: $999 / £799

Bluesound sells the Pulse Cinema Mini in many international markets, including the US, UK, and Canada. However, it hasn’t yet released the soundbar in Australia.

At $999 / £799, the Pulse Cinema Mini is considerably more expensive than its closest direct competitors, like the Bose Smart Soundbar at $499 / £499.95, and Sonos Beam Gen 2 at $499 / £499.

However, it boasts better performance and has several features that set it apart. The Pulse Cinema Mini includes a wall-mount bracket; it’s larger and more powerful than the Bose and Sonos models, and it includes an analog input, wired subwoofer output, USB storage access, and two-way Bluetooth with aptX Adaptive, all of which are absent on the Smart Soundbar and Beam Gen 2.

(Image credit: Future)Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini review: Specs

Dimensions (W x H x D)

(W x H x D): 33.34 x 2.91 x 5.51 inches

Speaker channels

2.0 (2.1 with planned update)

Connections:

1x HDMI out (with eARC), optical in, RCA stereo in, USB-A, Gigabit Ethernet, RCA subwoofer-out, Wi-Fi (802.11ac), Bluetooth 5.2 (two-way, with aptX Adaptive support)

Dolby Atmos/DTS:X

Yes/No

Sub included

Rear speakers included

Features

AirPlay 2, Tidal Connect, Spotify Connect, Qobuz Connect, Roon Ready, multiroom audio, expandable channel layout, hi-res audio

File formats

MP3, AAC, WMA, WMA-L, OGG, OPUS, FLAC, MQA, ALAC, WAV, AIFF, MPEG-4 SLS, DSD256

Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini review: Features

(Image credit: Future)

Analog, USB, subwoofer, and two-way Bluetooth connections
Expandable and multiroom compatible
Hi-res Audio and Dolby Atmos support

As is the case for a lot of small-footprint soundbars, the Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini doesn’t has only one HDMI port, so you won’t be able to connect devices like streaming video players, Blu-ray players, or game consoles and pass through their video to your TV.

However, it also offers connections that are rarely found in this class of speaker, such as dedicated analog inputs (as well as optical digital), a wired subwoofer output, and a USB port that provides access to music stored on a hard drive.

Even its Bluetooth capability exceeds standard soundbar fare, with its support for Qualcomm’s high-quality aptX Adaptive codec and the ability to stream in two directions: from a phone or computer to the soundbar, or from the soundbar to a set of wireless headphones or a Bluetooth speaker.

Bluesound gets compared to Sonos a lot. Bluesound’s BluOS apps for phones and computers perform many of the same multi-room and music management functions as Sonos’ software.

Like Sonos, Bluesound makes a range of wireless audio devices from speakers to subwoofers to streamers that can all work seamlessly together in one household. The Cinema Mini can be bonded with various combinations of these speakers for a true surround sound experience, or it can simply play the same music at the same time for a synchronized house party.

Thanks to its compatibility with multiple hi-res audio formats and sample rates, many audiophiles feel that Bluesound is superior to Sonos.

Still, there are a few things Bluesound can’t do. You can stream Apple Music via AirPlay or Bluetooth, but neither of these gives you lossless quality, and the BluOS app doesn’t have native support for Apple Music, YouTube Music, or Spotify. Unlike Sonos, there's no easy in-app room correction here.

It also doesn't support support DTS, it doesn't support Google Cast, it’s not compatible with Google Home — but Sonos also lacks these.

Currently, despite its Dolby Atmos certification, native support of Amazon Music, and Tidal Connect compatibility, there’s no way to stream Dolby Atmos Music to the Pulse Cinema Mini without the help of an HDMI-connected third-party device, such as an Apple TV 4K. Since the Mini only has one HDMI eARC port, that device will need to use your TV as a go-between.

Features score: 3.5 / 5

Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini review: Sound quality

(Image credit: Future)

Impressive low end and virtual surround
No dialogue mode or Low Frequency Effects (LFE) channel
Great for music, but no EQ, tone control, or Dolby Atmos Music

Before we get into sound quality, a quick note on the Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini’s stated specifications. Bluesound says it’s a 2.1-channel system, but this isn’t entirely accurate.

According to the company, the soundbar will be capable of processing low-frequency effects (or LFE — the subwoofer part of a soundtrack) without any help from a standalone subwoofer; it’s just that, as of the time of reviewing, it doesn’t actually do so.

For now, if you want true, 2.1 sound from the Cinema Mini, you’ll need to connect a powered sub via the soundbar’s sub output, or buy the Bluesound Plus Sub+ wireless subwoofer.

Having said that, even with only two discrete channels, this is a very capable soundbar for both multichannel and stereo sound. Thanks to a pair of dedicated woofers and passive bass radiators, it pumps out surprisingly deep and resonant bass, which leads me to believe that it will have no problem with LFE channel content when and if Bluesound adds it.

For music, the Cinema Mini’s bass is powerful enough to get by without a subwoofer in smaller rooms.

My experience with two-channel soundbars, even those that can process Dolby Atmos, has been less than stellar. So I have to give Bluesound a lot of credit for the Cinema Mini’s acoustic design and digital signal processing (DSP). With an angled tweeter and midrange driver located at each end of the bar, it projects sound both outward and to the sides, creating a soundstage with remarkable width and detail.

It reminds me a lot of Sennheiser’s Ambeo Soundbar Mini, which also uses just six powered drivers to achieve its virtualized surround sound. Unlike the Ambeo Soundbar Mini, which suffers from a lack of low-end, the Pulse Cinema Mini has a full-range sound that won’t disappoint.

Still, when it comes to Dolby Atmos, you’ll need to temper your expectations. The Cinema Mini’s DSP has to do a lot of heavy lifting to get its two discrete channels to virtualize surround and height content. It does a decent job with the surrounds, but height effects aren’t especially distinct.

During the Aston Martin chase scene from No Time To Die, there’s a moment when the camera passes beneath a set of church bells. Well-executed height systems let you hear the bells move overhead, but the Cinema Mini’s processing just makes the sound bigger, not taller or dynamic.

I find this to be true of nearly all Atmos systems that lack up-firing drivers. The Sonos Beam Gen 2, for instance, doesn’t perform any better in the height department. But the Beam Gen 2 is half the price of the Pulse Cinema Mini. Sonos’ Arc Ultra, by contrast, is basically the same price as the Cinema Mini, and will win any Dolby Atmos competition, hands down.

The same is true when it comes to the Cinema Mini’s lack of an LFE channel. In that same No Time To Die scene, James Bond’s ride is riddled with machine gun fire. When you’re inside the car with Bond, the Sonos Arc Ultra renders each bullet impact viscerally — its built-in subwoofer lets you feel the concussion. It’s still an enjoyable scene via the Cinema Mini (it captures the bullet ricochets nicely), but you’ll definitely need to add a sub if you want deeper cinematic immersion.

For its wide soundstage, the Cinema Mini pays a small price in terms of dialogue clarity. I don’t want to overstate this — I had no problem making out speech — but with no central tweeter or midrange, voices don’t have the same laser-like focus that you’ll get from the Ambeo Soundbar Mini, or even the Bose Smart Soundbar.

As good as TV sound is on the Pulse Cinema Mini, the real reason for dropping a thousand dollars on this speaker is its music performance. I seldom heap praise on soundbars for music listening, but the Cinema Mini is truly superb for its class.

(Image credit: Future)

Stereo rendering is where Bluesound’s decision to use a two-channel architecture pays big dividends. Whether you listen with or without the optional Surround Upmixer and Virtualizer modes turned on (inside the BluOS app), the Cinema Mini produces a beautifully balanced, smooth, and detailed sound.

Sitting front and center lets you hear strong stereo imaging and a perfectly placed phantom center channel. But do yourself a favor and turn on the Surround Upmixer and Virtualizer. The purists among you may scoff, but I love the extended width these DSP filters create. The Cinema Mini grows to twice its length — maybe more — and panned stereo sounds seem to float ethereally in the upper front corners of my room.

The bass response, which I’ve come to think of as the Mini’s secret weapon, is well-managed from low to high volumes, musically anchoring tracks with its resonance and weight. Distortion is almost non-existent, and the Cinema Mini effortlessly plays at very loud levels.

If there’s one hitch in an otherwise excellent sound system, it’s that Bluesound is a bit too confident you’ll like its tuning. There are no bass/treble tone controls and no traditional equalizer, or EQ presets — with the exception of three optional listening “modes”: Movie, Music, and Late Night.

I’m familiar with this approach — the Cinema Mini isn’t the first Bluesound speaker I’ve reviewed — but it continues to surprise me, especially given that the company is highly regarded by audiophiles, who tend to have strong feelings about how things should sound.

Would I change much if I actually had access to these settings? Apart from de-emphasizing the highs just a tad, no, I wouldn’t make any other modifications. I really love the way the Cinema Mini sounds.

Sound quality score: 4.5 / 5

Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini review: Design

(Image credit: Future)

Elegant, fabric-wrapped, rounded shape
Larger than many small-room soundbars
Wall-mountable with auto-orientation detection

All-plastic construction is the norm for compact soundbars. This doesn’t necessarily mean they look bad — I’d argue the Sonos Beam Gen 2 is quite handsome — but the Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini’s fabric-wrapped and gently curved shape looks a little more upscale, and a little less speaker-ish.

At 33.3 inches wide, the Cinema Mini is bigger than most compact soundbars. By contrast, the Beam Gen 2 is 25.6 inches, and the Bose Smart Soundbar is 27.3. The Cinema Mini is also slightly taller and deeper. Still, despite this larger footprint, it won’t look out of place under any TV from 32- to 55-inches, and as I noted in the Sound Quality section, this extra size pays dividends.

Under that soft grille lies the Pulse Cinema Mini’s unusual driver arrangement: the midrange drivers and tweeters are placed at the ends, each slightly angled up and out — no front-firing units and no centrally mounted high-frequency driver for dialogue. Meanwhile, the central body is occupied by the two woofers and their matching passive radiators.

(Image credit: Future)

This design (plus built-in, automatically triggered EQ changes) lets the Pulse Cinema Mini sound more or less the same whether you place it on a tabletop or mount it to a wall. Unlike the Beam Gen 2 and Smart Soundbar, whose optional wall mount brackets amount to small shelves, the Pulse Cinema Mini’s included hardware lets it cling to the wall without sticking out into the room.

Like Sonos’ speakers, Bluesound doesn’t ship its products with remote controls, but the Pulse Cinema Mini has a built-in IR receiver and can be operated with any IR remote you already own by teaching the soundbar (via the BluOS app) what to do when you press certain remote buttons. Sonos can do this, too, but only when using its soundbars for TV audio.

On the top surface, you’ll find a glass panel that houses the soundbar’s touch controls. Only the central play/pause icon remains lit — the presets and volume icons light up when you approach. There’s no independent volume level indicator, something I wish more companies would offer; however, your TV will likely display an on-screen indicator when the Pulse Cinema Mini is playing TV audio via HDMI.

Design score: 4 / 5

Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini review: Setup and usability

(Image credit: Future)

Easy set up with excellent app support
App has a learning curve

Like most soundbars, getting the Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini set up at a basic level is super easy: Plug it into your TV using the included HDMI cable, and then plug it into the wall with one of the included power cables (Bluesound puts both North American and E.U. versions in the box). You’ll immediately get great TV sound.

However, TV sound is only half of the experience with the Pulse Cinema Mini. To enjoy its awesome music capabilities, you need the BluOS app for iOS or Android. The app gets the soundbar connected to your Wi-Fi network and enables Apple AirPlay, plus it downloads and installs any available software updates, and gives you all of the deeper controls needed to customize the Pulse Cinema Mini to your liking.

The BluOS app also enables you to access multiple streaming services from a single interface and control playback across all BluOS compatible devices (which includes models from NAD, Dali, PSB Speakers, and Monitor Audio).

The BluOS app is fast and responsive, though, as with any platform that has as many features and options as BluOS, there’s a learning curve. Some things are straightforward, such as browsing music from available services, while others take some getting used to.

For instance, some of the Pulse Cinema Mini’s settings are available from the Now Playing screen or the Players tab, but others are only accessible via the Settings icon on the Home tab, and only if the soundbar is first selected in the Players tab.

There are loads of handy features like alarms, sleep timers, and smart playlists; however, BluOS hasn’t mastered one trick that makes Sonos, Wiim, and Denon/HEOS so appealing for those with multiple sources of music: universal search and favorites management.

If you decide to expand the Pulse Cinema Mini with Bluesound’s Pulse Sub+ and/or Pulse M/Pulse Flex speakers, these can easily be added and configured in the BluOS app.

Bluesound doesn’t integrate either Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant into its products, but if you’ve already got an Alexa smart speaker, there’s a Bluesound skill that will let Alexa control your Pulse Cinema Mini (and any other Bluesound products you add later).

Setup & usability score: 3.5 / 5

Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini review: Value

(Image credit: Future)

Expensive, but better sound than the competition
The best small soundbar for music
Value grows if you’re planning to expand

Look, there’s no way to justify the Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini’s price based purely on its performance as a Dolby Atmos soundbar. It’s got great sound, but it can’t hold a candle to bigger, more powerful models such as the Sonos Arc Ultra, Bose Smart Ultra Soundbar, or Sony Bravia Theater Bar 8, which are the same price (give or take $100).

However, there are several other attributes that set the Cinema Mini apart, and these may tip the value balance if you want them. Want to hook up a turntable? Do you have an existing wired subwoofer you’d like to use? Is your room just too small for a full-size soundbar, but you don’t want to compromise on audio quality — especially when it comes to music listening? Do you like the idea of connecting a set of Bluetooth headphones? And are you looking for ultimate flexibility when it comes to expanding both your home theater as well as your whole-home audio?

If you answered yes to any or all of these questions, the Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini starts to look like it’s worth its nearly $1,000 asking price.

Just keep in mind that Bluesound’s other components often carry similarly high prices. Unless you get a bundle discount, adding the Pulse Sub+ will cost $899, and a pair of Pulse M surrounds adds another $998. You’re now up to $2,896, and your resulting 4.1-channel Dolby Atmos home theater system still lacks a center and height channels. Meanwhile, the same investment can get you a Sonos Arc Ultra + Sub 4 + 2x Era 300, with 9.1.4-channel sound.

Value score: 3 / 5

Should I buy the Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini?

(Image credit: Future)

Section

Notes

Score

Features

Some great rare features, including analog, subwoofer, and 2-way Bluetooth connections. But it's also lacking some core soundbar features you get in the competition.

3.5 / 5

Sound quality

Impressive low end and virtual surround given its size. Best in class when it comes to music, as well.

4.5 / 5

Design

It has an elegant, fabric-wrapped, rounded shape. Larger than some smaller room soundbars. You can mount it with auto-orientation detection.

4 / 5

Setup & usability

Easy setup here and the app support is great, although using the app does come with a learning curve.

3.5 / 5

Value

There's no getting around the fact it's expensive but it is excellent for music and the value grows if you're planning to expand.

3 / 5

Buy it if...

Music is as important as movies
The Pulse Cinema Mini does a good job with TV audio, but its music performance is truly superb for a soundbar.

You like versatility
With an analog, optical, and USB input, plus a subwoofer output, there are lots you can connect to the Pulse Cinema Mini.

You’re planning to expand
As part of the BluOS ecosystem, you can grow the Cinema Mini as a home theater system and as part of a larger multi-room audio setup.

Don't buy it if...

You’re just looking for better TV audio
There are plenty of other soundbars that can up your TV audio game (with Dolby Atmos too) for a lot less money.

You’re shopping for a very small bedroom
While it’s small enough for small rooms, the Cinema Mini has impressively big sound, which might be overkill for small spaces.

You want the biggest cinematic bang for the buck
The Cinema Mini is impressive for its size, but if you’re after top-notch home theater, you can spend the same amount and get way more performance from bigger, more powerful models.View Deal

Samsung HW-Q990H review: Also consider

Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini

Sonos Beam Gen 2

Bose Smart Soundbar

Sonos Arc Ultra

Price (May 2026)

$999 / £799

$499 / £499 / $699

$499 / £499 / AU$799

$999 / £799 / AU$1,799

Dimensions

33.34 x 2.91 x 5.51 inches (W x H x D)

25.6 x 2.3 x 3.9 inches (W x H x D)

27.34 x 2.21 x 4.01 inches (W x H x D)

2.95 x 46.38 x 4.35 inches (75 x 1178 x 110.6mm)

Speaker channels

2.0 (2.1 with planned update) with virtual Atmos

3.0 with virtual Atmos

3.0.2 with virtual Atmos

9.1.4 (including virtual Atmos)

Connections

1x HDMI out (with eARC), optical in, RCA stereo in, USB-A, Gigabit Ethernet, RCA subwoofer-out, Wi-Fi (802.11ac), Bluetooth 5.2 (two-way, with aptX Adaptive support)

HDMI (with eARC), Ethernet. 802.11b/g/n/ac, 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2

HDMI, Optical, Bluetooth, USB, sub out, IR

1x HDMI with eARC, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth

Dolby Atmos/DTS:X

Yes/No

Sub included

Rear speakers included

Sonos Beam Gen 2
If you’re shopping for a soundbar specifically for smaller rooms, you can save a lot of money by going with the Sonos Beam Gen 2. You can expand it with subwoofers and surrounds, and it makes a great wireless music speaker.
Read our full Sonos Beam Gen 2 review

Bose Smart Soundbar
Like the Sonos Beam Gen 2, the Bose Smart Soundbar is a good cheaper choice. Like the Beam Gen 2, it's expandable. It's not as powerful as the Pulse Cinema Mini, especially for low-end bass, but it's got more than enough oomph for bedrooms and other smaller spaces.
Read our full Bose Smart Soundbar reviewView Deal

Sonos Arc Ultra
The Sonos Arc Ultra is the same price as the Cinema Mini, basically. For that small extra investment, you’re getting one of the most impressive standlone Dolby Atmos soundbars on the market, and it will easily outperform the Cinema Mini for pure cinematic immersion.
Read our full Sonos Arc Ultra review

How I tested the Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini

Used Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini as main audio system for one week
Tested in basement media room
Sources include Apple TV 4K, Nvidia Shield, and streamed music from various apps

I spent a full week with the Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini as my main audio system for watching movies, shows, and music in my basement media room.

During that time, I played a variety of Dolby Atmos test clips from movies like No Time To Die, Ford v Ferrari, Mad Max: Fury Road, Dune, and Unbroken, paying special attention to details like dialogue clarity, surround sound, and height channel impact.

I streamed most content from an Apple TV 4K connected via an LG OLED TV, which fed the MK2 from its HDMI eARC output, but I also connected an Nvidia Shield TV to an eARC extractor so I could hear the Cinema Mini’s treatment of Dolby Atmos in Dolby TrueHD.

For music, I used a variety of apps, including Tidal, Qobuz, and Amazon Music, listening to a wide range of genres. Some were played from apps on the Apple TV 4K and Nvidia Shield, while others were streamed wirelessly using AirPlay, Bluetooth, Tidal Connect, and Qobuz Connect. I tested several of these within the BluOS app as well.

First reviewed: May 2026
Read more about how we test

Categories: Reviews

Corsair Makr Pro 75 review: close to being damn near perfect

Sat, 06/13/2026 - 06:00

Corsair Makr Pro 75 one-minute review

It's difficult to ignore just how big of an impact the custom keyboard community has had on mainstreaming gaming options in the last decade or so.

Jump back in time three, four, or even five years, and the very idea of the Makr Pro 75 would've been inconceivable, certainly in Corsair's product arsenal. Eight layers of sound-dampening, gasket plates, magnetic hot-swappable hall effect switches, the spec sheet is rich and detailed, and would make 21-year-old me, with his first-ever mechanical Cherry MX Red, weep if he saw it 14 years ago.

Just take a look at the switches, they're linear magnetic hall effect, MGX Hyperdrive models (a mouthful, I know). Aside from being hot-swappable, they're pre-lubed, dual-rail designs with a shine-through PBT keycap that actuate at a fully custom-calibrated actuation point of your choosing. If you want to bottom the thing all the way out, you can; if you want it to actuate the instant your finger barely touches the top, it'll do that too.

The build is just on another level, and it shows. What's less enticing, however, is the price. At £220 UK or $250 US at time of writing, it's a serious chunk of cash to lay out, and although the quality is there, there's a good argument to be had as to just whether that's worth it compared to competitor solutions at nearly half the cost.

If you're after a small form factor, 75% keyboard that's more than capable of handling gaming and typing, one of the best gaming keyboards money can buy, while delivering a class that straddles the line between a custom build and an off-the-shelf model, without the faff of getting out the soldering iron, the Makr Pro 75 is well worth considering.

Corsair Makr Pro 75 review: Price & release date

Almost DIY price, but, y'know, it's built
Available in the UK, US, and Australia
Hard to find a prebuilt solution quite like this

Now here's the kicker: Corsair's Makr series is a bit of a three-headed hydra in terms of product stack. It's all built around that custom aftermarket DIY keyboard ethos. You've got the standard Makr 75, where you can customise exactly what parts you want, and Corsair will ship you the bundle to construct yourself. You can have that same bespoke model, but pre-assembled, or grab this more "off-the-shelf"-esque Makr Pro instead.

The latter has colourways, switch-types, backplates, and LCD/Wireless modules, and keycaps, to add at your leisure along the way. The Makr Pro, however, is a single model and a single model only. There's no alternative colours, no keycap variations (bar regional layouts), and well, that's it. That does come with some wins, though, firstly it's the only board that supports hot-swappable magnetic switches (and comes with those MGX options by default), and secondly, it's quite a bit cheaper.

The equivalent Makr line built to spec using minimal components will set you back $265 on Corsair's website, versus the Pro's $250.

Corsair Makr Pro 75 review: Specs

Price

$249.99 / £219.99 / AU$523

Layout

75% (UK ISO as tested)

Switch

Corsair MGX Hyperdrive hall-effect (magnetic)

Switch specs

Adjustable 0.1–4.0actuation; Rapid Trigger; hot-swappable

Keycaps

double-shot PBT, shine-through

Dimensions

330 × 142 × 47mm (13 × 5.59 × 1.85")

Connectivity

Wired USB-C; optional 2.4GHz / Bluetooth module (sold separately)

Polling rate

Up to 8,000Hz wired

Rollover / anti-ghosting

Full-key rollover (NKRO)

Weight

1.282kg (2.83lb)

Corsair Makr Pro 75 review: Design

Outstanding build quality and exceptional sound deadening
No full-size variant
Rotary dial looks awesome, and a welcome addition

This is, without a doubt, the heaviest board I've ever had in for review. It weighs a staggering 1.282 KG (or 2.83 lbs), and honestly, it feels like you could club someone to death with it, it's that ridiculous. It's got a fully built custom aluminum housing, and inside of that live eight layers of sound dampening.

Let me take a breath because the list is long. You've got… silicon rubber padding, pad foam PET backing, PU pad foam, socket foam, PET film, IXPE switch foam, transparent PET backing, and PU plate foam, all situated around that hall effect compatible PCB, which is further secured in place, with both a gasket mount solution for the switches, and stabilisation with an FR4 switch plate for even more rigidity. Like, seriously, guys… It's just not good enough. I expect 14 layers on the next one (that's a joke).

(Image credit: Future)

I mention that hall effect PCB because it's an important detail here. Although you can swap out the keys, it's only compatible with magnetic switches that can take advantage of the hall effect sensors.

If you've got a slew of old Gateron switches that you just love, you're going to have to grab the Makr 75 instead of this slightly cheaper model (frustrating I know). Albeit that is a niche in a niche.

(Image credit: Future)

There's some other customisation options you can add in here, too, if you're looking to bump the price higher. You can get a wireless module to ditch the cables (effectively strapping a 50-hour battery life to the thing with no RGB enabled, although it is worth noting that's a fraction of the time you get compared to the standard mechanical switch variant at 172 hours). And, you can chuck out the lovely rotary dial for a teeny tiny LCD display, for some reason.

One thing I will say. After spending some time with the latest Corsair Galleon 100 SD, the build here is just outstanding by comparison (which is bizarre given it comes from the same company, and the Galleon costs significantly more).

(Image credit: Future)

The only downside? No, full-size variant. And I know I know, the ergonomics are better, and proper gamers only use 75% boards. But I'm an old man now, I game just as much as I mash in my credit card details to buy yet another air fryer.

Corsair Makr Pro 75 review: Performance

Key switches are gorgeous, Hall effect are stunning for typists and gamers alike
The argument about dampening feels subjective
iCUE vs Web Hub is a confusing mess

Can we talk about iCUE quickly, because it seriously frustrates me? Now, this is less of an issue with the Makr Pro directly as it's compatible with both iCUE and Corsair's new Web Hub, thing, but, right now, we're in this weird world where we have not one, but three different programs to manage your Corsair umbrella hardware, with a transition over to Web Hub for the newer products.

What's Web Hub? Glad you asked. Effectively, a lightweight replacement for iCUE, built out of a webpage connecting directly to your Corsair hardware, and fully installable as a PWA app on your desktop.

What's the problem then? Not everything supports it, that Galleon 100 SD I mentioned earlier fails to show on iCUE entirely and is only picked up on Web Hub (and the Elgato Stream Deck app…). That's particularly annoying because if you're running Firefox, Web Hub simply won't work.

As I say, thankfully, the Makr Pro 75 is compatible with both, but if this is a sign of things to come, well, I'm a lot less enthusiastic about it. Particularly as we've only had a promise that legacy component support is coming later down the line, but as and when that happens? Who knows.

(Image credit: Future)

Software drama aside, overall typing is just a joy. My heavy-handed (read: hench) fingers absolutely love these keycaps and the surprisingly tactile feedback that each gives on full depression is just stunning. It's smooth, clean, and rapid. Actuation is beautifully clean, and the fact that you can adjust them to your absolute preference (again, so my heavy sausage fingers don't accidentally actuate while resting) is a real treat.

An added bonus on that front is FlashTap SOCD Handling, which effectively allows you to decide how your strafe keys behave on accidental keypress. Pressing D, but your finger slips on A, you can have it still move left with A, continue pressing D, or cancel both key presses simultaneously to stop you moving. It's a neat addition, particularly given how sensitive you can make the actuation point.

There has been some criticism around the industry that the sound dampening might be too aggressive, but honestly, I just don't see it. It may well be that your mileage varies depending on how you type. If you're a heavy keypress lubber like I am, you'll be more than at home on this thing.

(Image credit: Future)

There's one minor caveat I have on this thing, though, and that's the cost. It ain't cheap, chief. Asus's ROG Strix Scope II RX, for example, currently slides in at nearly half the price of this thing on Amazon, and you get similar performance from it. Pre-lubed optical red linear switches, sound dampening, a (singular) comprehensive software suite, and dare I say a numpad? Is it at the same level as the Makr Pro? No… But it's damn close.

Should I buy the Corsair Makr Pro 75?

Corsair Makr Pro 75 Scorecard

Attribute

Notes

Score

Value

It's not the cheapest keyboard in the shed that's for sure, but Corsair's Makr Pro 75 is markedly more affordable than its fully custom Makr counterpart, and packs in a ton of spec for the price.

3.5/5

Design

An otherworldly construction, and eight layers of sound-dampening make this the heaviest and possibly nicest keyboard money can buy.

4.5/5

Performance

MGX switches are fast, responsive, and backed up with some seriously slick Flashtap SOCD tech, as well as eliminating unwanted input. iCUE/Web Hub is frustrating, though.

4.5/5

Buy it if…

You want the custom board without the custom
Prebuilt sound-deadened, hot swappable switches baked inside a CNC aluminum chassis. She's a beauty and well worth it if you like the frills but don't have the time to commit to your own custom keeb.View Deal

You're a gamer and a professional
The MGX switch is outstanding for typists and gamers alike. Fast, agile, and oh so satisfying to click down on. Plus, you get that rapid trigger and 8,000 Hz polling.View Deal

You want god-tier build quality
It's dense, seriously dense. And that's all thanks to a wild amount of sound dampening and some serious internals giving it plenty of heft, and a surprisingly nice feel under click.View Deal

Don’t buy it if…

You're after "affordable" or "good value"
This ain't it. The Makr Pro 75 is a beauty sure, but the price tag is steep. There are boards that deliver similar quality at a far lower price point.View Deal

You're after a numpad at this quality
Live and die by your calculations? Spamming your card details and phone number every five minutes? That lack of numpad is going to ruin your day.View Deal

Also consider

Corsair Vanguard Air 99 Wireless

Fancy staying in the Corsair camp but want wireless and a near full layout? The Air 99 is a fine answer to that, with built in 8,000 Hz wireless, streaming keys, plus a rotary dial and LCD screen, it's a good choice. The only caveat? Low profile opto-mechanical switches rather than the beauty of Hall MGX.

Read our full Corsair Vanguard Air 99 Wireless review View Deal

Asus ROG Strix Scope II RX

If the missing numpad and the price just aren't your cup of tea, Asus' Strix Scope II RX might be your missing biscuit. It's a full-size board with outstanding pre-lubed RX Red linear optical switches, proper sound dampening, and PBT keycaps for around half the cost of the Makr and Makr Pro.

Read our full Asus ROG Strix Scope II RX review View Deal

How I tested the Corsair Makr Pro 75

Two weeks as my daily driver
Tested across all types of content (gaming, novel-writing, day-to-day work)
Used across multiple PCs
Over a decade of testing PC hardware and 14 years of being keyboard-obsessed

Me and the Makr Pro 75 spent a lovely two weeks together straight. I swapped it out as my daily driver, and used it across both my own digital agency and freelance journalism as well, and leaned on it heavily for everything from hammering out chapters in a novel I'm writing, to long sessions in Total War: Warhammer 3, World of Warcraft as a healer, and dabbling in Cyberpunk 2077 too.

I wanted to ensure it was used across a mix of different applications and games, and thoroughly tested across all genres as well. The keyboard market is no longer targeted solely at young adults and kids, but also to those of us with full-time jobs as well, so ensuring it was capable of a bit of everything was tantamount to this review. I wanted to make certain that it was capable of handling a 2,000-word after-market PC build feature, as it was in a quick three-hour raid sesh.

Alongside the hands-on time, I also dug into the wider keyboard market as well, researching competing boards at and around the Makr Pro 75's price to place its build, switches, and value in proper context. I've spent over a decade testing PC hardware and peripherals, so I've got plenty of experience to draw on, both for how a board this expensive should feel and whether the asking price genuinely adds up.

Read TechRadar’s reviews guarantee
First reviewed: June 2026

Categories: Reviews

The KitchenAid KF4 brews a beautifully balanced espresso thanks to its Intelligrind system, but its iced drink menu left me cold

Sat, 06/13/2026 - 03:00

KitchenAid KF4: two-minute review

The KitchenAid Fully Automatic Espresso Machine KF4 is a new addition to the company’s lineup, and though it looks very similar to earlier models like the KF3 and KF6, it’s considerably smaller and a great choice for compact kitchens. It also offers particularly good noise shielding, and during my tests it proved quieter than its siblings when grinding and brewing.

It has the same Intelligrind system as KitchenAid’s larger machines, making it easy to achieve the correct dosage for your chosen coffee. With just a few manual tweaks of the grinder (which can be adjusted via a dial), you’ll soon be enjoying consistently delicious, well-extracted espresso.

The KF4’s automatic milk system lets you use that espresso in delicious lattes and cappuccinos, and while it’s optimized for dairy, it worked perfectly well with barista-style oat milk as well, producing foam that was almost as thick and creamy, and just the right temperature.

The KF4 brews a mean macchiato and works well with plant milk despite not having a dedicated mode for it (Image credit: Future)

It’s a shame, then, that the KF4’s ‘iced’ espresso and coffee options didn’t deliver the results I’d hoped. Many espresso machines offer cold extraction, which takes longer to brew but delivers a drink with a mellow flavor that’s easily turned into an iced latte or enjoyed on its own. The KF4 brews its ‘iced’ drinks at a lower temperature than usual, but the resulting coffee is still hot enough to melt ice within a minute or two, leaving you with a drink that’s diluted and lukewarm.

Otherwise, this is an excellent mid-range automatic espresso machine that’s solidly made, easy to use, and simple to keep clean. Its components aren’t dishwasher-safe, but its excellent set of maintenance programs means keeping everything hygienic (including the milk system) is a piece of cake.

KitchenAid KF4: specifications

Name

KitchenAid Fully Automatic Espresso Machine KF4

Type

Bean-to-cup

Dimensions (W x H x D)

7.68 x 6.3 x 18.7 inches / 195 x 160 x 475mm

Weight

19.8lbs / 9kg

Water reservoir capacity

1.9 quarts / 1.8 liters

Milk frother

Yes (automatic, dairy only)

Bars of pressure

Noise level

72dB grinding, 60dB brewing

User profiles

KitchenAid KF4: price and availability

Launched April 2026
Available in US and UK
List price $1,299.99 / £899 (about AU$1,850)

The KitchenAid Fully Automatic Espresso Machine KF4 launched in April 2026 with a list price of $1,299.99 / £899, putting it in the middle of KitchenAid’s range of automatic coffee makers. That’s about AU$1,850, but the KF4 isn’t yet available in Australia.

If you like the look of the KF4 but your budget won’t quite stretch that far, take a look at the KitchenAid KF3. It's very similar to the KF4 but has a slightly smaller range of drinks and no milk carafe. Instead, you place the end of the milk tube in a glass or cup, which is a less elegant solution, but one that cuts the price to $999.99 / £749 (about AU$1,420).

For comparison, KitchenAid’s top-end fully automatic espresso machine, the KF8, is priced at $1,999.99 / £1,899 / AU$2,599, while the lower-specced KF2 is $799.99 / £699 (about AU$1,140).

Value score: 4/5

KitchenAid KF4: design

Smaller than previous KitchenAid automatic espresso machines
Milk system is easy to use and clean
No components are dishwasher-safe

The KF4 looks very much like KitchenAid’s previous automatic coffee makers, but with one significant difference: it’s much more compact. The KF6 measures 10.2 x 14.3 x 18.6 inches / 260 x 363 x 473mm, while the new KF4 is 7.68 x 6.3 x 18.7 inches / 195 x 160 x 475mm (H x W x D). This allows it to slide into a much narrower space, making it a great option for bijou kitchens.

Otherwise, the KF4 follows the same design language as other KitchenAid machines with its boxy shape and rounded corners, and a choice of porcelain white or matt black finishes. However, the company has made a few thoughtful tweaks here. The brushed stainless steel at the top of earlier models has been replaced with plastic, for example, and the metal around the edge of the drip tray has a satin finish. The overall look is sleeker and more modern, and the area surrounding the display is no longer susceptible to gathering unsightly fingerprints.

The water tank is robust, and the KF4 is supplied with a filter (Image credit: Future)

The 3.5 inch / 8.8cm color touchscreen is supplemented by six buttons: four that provide quick access to the menu, profiles, rinsing cycles, and machine settings; one that initiates brewing; and one that cancels the current drink. The screen has a noticeably lower resolution than other espresso machines I’ve tested recently, such as the Philips Café Aromis, but it’s clear and responsive.

The bean hopper is generously sized, and unlike many other brands, KitchenAid’s designers have opted for an opaque lid with a silicone seal. This means you can’t check how many beans are left at a glance, but ensures that your coffee isn’t exposed to unnecessary light and air, thereby keeping it fresh longer. The lid is fully removable rather than hinged, which makes the hopper easier to access if you keep your coffee maker underneath a wall cabinet, and it has a chute for a scoop of pre-ground coffee if you want to mix things up. A suitably-sized scoop is provided with the machine.

The drip tray is large and deep, helping avoid spillsFutureThe bean hopper has a chute for adding a scoop of pre-ground coffeeFuture

The drip tray is deep, helping prevent spills, and has a large spout at the back for easy emptying. Used coffee grounds drop into a removable bin in the center, and during testing I was pleased to see that this was a very tidy process. Some espresso machines manage to spread wet grounds all over the drip tray and the interior of the case, but not the KF4.

The water tank is large too, and feels very sturdy. It has a hinged lid and a recessed handle, making it easy to remove, carry, and slide back into place without spilling. The KF4 is also supplied with a water-testing strip and water filter. The tank is quite narrow, so reaching inside to fit the filter can be tricky, but this doesn’t need to be done too often.

You can keep the milk carafe in the fridge between uses (Image credit: Future)

The KF4’s milk system is the same as that of the KF8, with a lidded carafe that connects to the machine via a silicone tube. Lift a small cover on the side of the KF4’s coffee dispenser to reveal a socket, push one end of the hose into place, then attach the other to the carafe. It’s not as neat as the Philips LatteGo system, where the milk carafes are made from three simple pieces of hard plastic, but the KF4’s rinsing and cleaning programs help keep everything hygienic. The milk carafe can be stored in the fridge between uses, but none of the removable parts — including the milk system, drip tray, and grounds container — are dishwasher-safe.

The height of the dispenser can be adjusted to accommodate different-sized cups, with a good range of movement that suits everything from an espresso cup to a 350ml coffee mug. The movement isn’t as smooth as with the latest machines from Philips and De’Longhi, which is a shame, but that's a minor quibble.

Design score: 4.5/5

KitchenAid KF4: performance

Consistently well-extracted espresso
Good milk foaming, despite lack of dedicated plant milk mode
Four user profiles, which can store four custom drinks each
‘Iced’ drinks are brewed at a lower temperature, but are still hot

Most importantly, the KitchenAid KF4 brews an excellent espresso. Its Intelligrind system selects the best dose for your coffee beans, and it’s easy to tweak the grind size for the optimum extraction. It produced very consistent results during my tests, and once I’d dialled in the best grind size for each type of coffee, I could be confident that it would always taste great.

Milk-foaming is great as well. Although there’s no option specifically for foaming plant milk, as there is with the KF8, I found it performed perfectly well using barista-style oat milk. I got the thickest, silkiest foam when using full-fat dairy milk, but plant and semi-skimmed milk were both fine as alternatives. However, it’s worth knowing that, unlike some other coffee makers I’ve tested recently (including the De’Longhi Primadonna Aromatic and Philips Café Aromis), the KitchenAid KF4 can only produce hot milk foam, so iced lattes and cappuccinos are off the menu.

Once you've dialled in the grind size, you can be confident you'll get consistent resultsFutureThe large touchscreen makes it easy to browse the menuFutureYou can adjust the brew settings and save a preset to your profileFuture

There are four user profiles, which will be plenty for most households. The downside is that each profile can only store four custom drinks. I found that the default volumes of espresso and milk were quite small, so I would have preferred to be able to create a lot more bespoke presets for quick access.

I was disappointed with the KF4’s two iced drink options (iced coffee and iced espresso). Many modern coffee makers — from the budget-friendly De’Longhi Dedica Duo through to the prosumer Jura J10 — offer cold-extracted espresso. This uses ambient temperature water direct from the tank and produces a drink with a more mellow flavor than hot espresso, which is ideal for iced drinks with or without milk.

Making an 'iced' coffee involves pouring warm espresso onto ice, which melts rapidly (Image credit: Future)

The KF4, on the other hand, takes the same approach as the Philips LatteGo 5500 Series by asking you to add a handful of ice to your cup and then pouring a shot of hot espresso over the top. KitchenAid says that the ‘iced’ espresso and coffee are brewed at a lower temperature than usual, but during my tests they were still hot enough to quickly melt the ice in my cup, leaving me with a diluted, lukewarm drink. I’ve come to expect better results from KitchenAid’s machines, and it was disappointing.

These two ‘iced’ options occupy two spots in the KF4’s menu that could be used for other drinks. The KF4 doesn’t have a preset for brewing a cortado, for example, which is a shame since it’s a favorite of mine.

The ''evaporate' option purges all water from the machine (Image credit: Future)

There’s better news when it comes to noise shielding. KitchenAid’s fully automatic coffee makers are some of the quietest on the market, and the KF4 is no exception. In fact, it’s one of the quietest machines I’ve ever used, averaging 72dB while grinding and 60dB while brewing.

Maintenance is refreshingly simple and thorough as well, with a choice of quick and deep cleaning options. The machine rinses itself upon startup and shutdown, prompts you to empty the drip tray and grounds container regularly, and asks you to rinse the milk system after each use. When it’s time for a more intensive clean, open the settings menu, and you’ll find options for washing the milk system and brewing unit with special cleaners. The KF4 is supplied with cleaning tablets for the brew unit, though you’ll need to buy descaler and milk system cleaner separately. There’s also an option for evaporating all the water in the machine, which is a brilliant feature I wish all automatic coffee machines had. It makes it easy to keep everything hygienically dry, and is particularly helpful if you’re going to be storing or shipping it.

Performance score: 4/5

Should you buy the KitchenAid KF4?KitchenAid KF4 score card

Attribute

Notes

Score

Value

One of KitchenAid's more affordable options.

4/5

Design

More compact than the brand's earlier auto machines, but just as smart-looking.

4.5/5

Performance

Excellent espresso and milk, but 'iced' options are disappointing and it can only store four custom drinks per user.

4/5

Buy it if

You want delicious espresso, quickly

The KitchenAid KF4 does its core job very well, brewing consistently delicious espresso quickly and quietly. It has relatively few frills compared to some other coffee makers I’ve tested recently, and that’s no bad thing.

You don’t want to pay over the odds

Automatic coffee makers are never cheap, but the KF4 is very reasonably priced for such a capable machine from a premium brand. The top-end KF8 costs twice as much.

You’re short of space

This is one of the most compact fully-automatic espresso machines on the market, and its slim case slides neatly into small spaces.

Don't buy it if

You want authentic-tasting cold-brewed coffee

The KF4’s ‘iced’ coffee options are brewed at a lower temperature than usual, but are still hot enough to melt ice and leave you with a diluted, lukewarm drink.

You want to tinker with lots of custom drinks

There are four user profiles, but the machine can only store four bespoke drinks for each one.

KitchenAid KF4: also consider

If you're not sure whether the KitchenAid KF8 is the right espresso machine for you, here are two other options to keep in mind.

KitchenAid KF8

KitchenAid's premium automatic espresso machine has dedicated modes for different plant milks, a more extensive drinks menu, more grind sizes, a much larger screen, and a higher price tag than the KF4.

Read our full KitchenAid KF8 review

Philips Cafe Aromis

This machine is about the same price as the KF4, but managed to outperform it. The Cafe Aromis has a better screen, brews proper cold-extracted coffee, can foam cold milk, and has a genuinely useful app.

Read my full Philips Cafe Aromis reviewView Deal

KitchenAid KF4: how I tested

I used the KitchenAid KF4 for two weeks, in place of my usual espresso machine. I used it to prepare a wide range of drinks with and without milk, using two different types of coffee to see how the machine would adapt, and how easy it was to dial in the grinder. I tested the milk system with barista-style oat milk, and both semi-skimmed and whole dairy milk. I ran the machine's cleaning programs as directed after each use, and used the brew unit cleaning and evaporation cycles at the end of testing.

First reviewed June 2026

Categories: Reviews

I tested majority's biggest Bluetooth party speaker and while it aces the rugged and durable part, it's no JBL Xtreme 5 — here’s why

Fri, 06/12/2026 - 20:00

Majority Move M4 review

The Majority Move M4 is a huge Bluetooth speaker boasting a mighty 70W power output, a rugged design, and plentiful battery life, making it very much reminiscent of JBL’s Xtreme range.

Yes, it's clear that the Cambridge-based audio brand is coming for JBL with its Move speakers — and this model I tested is the most powerful in its line. But can Majority compete with the likes of JBL with this release? Here’s what I think after many hours of listening with the Majority Move M4.

On the face of it, the Majority Move M4 has a lot of the features you’d expect from the best Bluetooth speakers. It has Bluetooth 6.0 for long-range connectivity, IP67 dust and waterproofing enabling it to survive a good dunking underwater, and a high power output for blasting tunes at parties or gatherings.

But this model struggles to keep up with the competition in a number of regards. And crucially, that’s mostly evident in its sound quality.

I started assessing the M4’s audio quality by playing KOLTER’s What a Day. This house tune just didn’t sound as I’d hoped — I was instantly struck by compressed audio, with tinny percussion that sounded grating, even at middling volume levels. Bass also lacked the authority and punch I was looking for, and the low-end sounded distorted at higher listening levels.

It was a similar story with I’ll Be Your by RUZE. Bass lacked dynamism, meaning that drops were anti-climactic. Mids also didn’t sound very well separated or rich, and the track just lacked that full-bodied, energetic quality necessary to replicate its excitement and vibrancy.

Even with a more stripped back track like 78 Rotações by Jards Macalé, I wasn’t a big lover of the M4. It definitely handled the less demanding nature of the track more effectively, with relatively clear vocals and decent enough balance across the frequency range. However, the tonality of acoustic guitars wasn’t the most accurate or expressive, and the finer details didn’t jump out at me.

Even though the M4 can get relatively loud, in part thanks to its 70W output power, it often sounds more shouty than regimented and impactful. Bass lacks the dynamism and drive you may expect. And with compressed-sounding treble that can err on the harsh side of things, this speaker struggles to compete, sonically speaking.

(Image credit: Future)

I experienced underwhelming sound while streaming over Bluetooth, but also when I was using a wired connection via a 3.5mm cable. However, you can also use the speaker with a USB flash drive or microSD card if you’d prefer. Both of these listening methods are admittedly on the niche side of things, but hey, they’re here.

There are a few more interesting features onboard, including customizable RGB lights. You can press the light button on the speaker and personalize the color and pattern to your liking, and although I prefer the classier lights of the JBL Xtreme 5, it looks fine. You can also turn the lights off if you’d prefer, which can conserve battery life.

Speaking of battery life, you get a pretty commendable 30 hours here, which is better than budget rivals like the Tribit Stormbox Lava. Other features include a built-in mic for hands-free calling and multi-speaker pairing… though I’m not sure why anyone would want two of these.

The fatal flaw in the features department is the M4’s lack of a companion app. That means there are no EQ options — a big miss — and no way to remotely alter lighting or other useful settings. This is a basic inclusion for a lot of Bluetooth speakers at this point, and was disappointing to see.

(Image credit: Future)

Before we wrap up, I want to speak about design. This thing is definitely reminiscent of the JBL Xtreme 4, with a pseudo-cylindrical build, fabric exterior, and rubber buttons. However, it looks like a far less appealing alternative. I wasn’t a fan of the flimsy-feeling handle, the blue and gray color scheme, or the cheap-looking radiators on each side. This sort of thing is subjective, of course, but the look of the M4 definitely didn’t do it for me.

With that said, the speaker feels fairly durable, and its IP67 rating means it's well protected against dust ingress, and can be submerged under a meter of water for as long as 30 minutes — a very solid level of protection.

OK, the Majority Move M4 is hardly the most expensive model on the market. It comes in at £119.95 (about $160 / AU$225). However, rivals such as the Tribit Stormbox Lava are available for less — and while that model is a little heavy-handed in the low-end, it certainly sounds better than this Majority speaker. The JBL Xtreme 4 is also available discounted regularly for as little as $250 / £199 (about AU$350), and although that’s a decent amount more, the jump in quality is outrageous.

Would I recommend the Majority Move M4? The answer is no, sadly. Despite its relatively rugged build and commendable battery life, it offers poor, unrefined audio that lacks energy in the low-end and control in the highs. There’s a generally compressed quality here, which means that your favorite songs just don’t sound as they could. Instead, I’d recommend scooping up an on-sale Xtreme 4 if this is the kind of speaker size you're after (and the budget you've set aside for it).

(Image credit: Future)Majority Move M4 review: price & release date

Priced at £119.95 (about $160 / AU$225)
Released in January 2026

The Majority Move M4 released in January 2026 in the UK, although at the time of writing, the speaker — alongside its sibling models, including the Move M1, M2, and M3 — are yet to land in the US or Australia. The Move M4 is priced at £119.95 (about $160 / AU$225), making it a lot cheaper than rivals like the JBL Xtreme line, and although it's the largest in its line, it remains pretty budget-friendly.

Majority Move M4 review: specs

Weight

5.3lbs / 2.4kg

Dimensions

12.2 x 4.9 x 4.7 inches / 310 x 125 x 120mm

Connectivity

Bluetooth 6.0, 3.5mm, USB, microSD

Battery life

30 hours

Speaker drivers

Not stated

Waterproofing

IP67

(Image credit: Future)Should I buy the Majority Move M4?

Attribute

Notes

Score

Features

Customizable lights, number of connectivity methods, but lack of an app is restrictive.

3/5

Performance

Compressed audio lacking in dynamism and clarity.

2.5/5

Design

Decent durability and waterproofing, but design lacks flair and appeal.

3/5

Value

It may not be the most expensive, but it’s significantly outperformed by similarly priced rivals.

2.5/5

Buy it if…

You want a wide array of playback options
One of the benefits of this speaker is its broad connectivity options. There’s Bluetooth, USB flash drive support, microSD playback, and even 3.5mm. That’s a pretty good line-up if you ask me.

You want a cheap large-sized speaker
If you don’t need the best sound out there, and just want a relatively powerful speaker to bring anywhere, then the Move M4 could still fit the bill. It’s fairly cheap for its size, and is highly waterproof, making it ideal for taking anywhere you go.

Don’t buy it if…

You want great audio quality
The Majority Move M4’s biggest downfall is its sound quality, which is below average, in my view. Ideally, you’d be able to grab an on-sale JBL Xtreme 4 (or even better the new JBL Xtreme 5), but there are other budget options I’d pick over this, including the below Tribit model and the Anker Soundcore Boom 2.

You want something stylish
I’m not a fan of how the Move M4 looks. Its bright blue detailing and greyish color don’t have the most cohesive look. If you want something stylish, I’d recommend checking out the Bose SoundLink Plus, or the smaller Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 if you don’t need massive power.

Majority Move M4 review: also consider

Majority Move M4

JBL Xtreme 4

Tribit Stormbox Lava

Price

£119.95 (about $160 / AU$225)

$379.95 / £329.99 / AU$499.95

$129.99 / £111 (about AU$200)

Weight

5.3lbs / 2.4kg

4.6lbs / 2.1kg

5.1lbs / 2.3kg

Dimensions

12.2 x 4.9 x 4.7 inches / 310 x 125 x 120mm

11.7 x 5.9 x 5.6 inches / 297 x 149 x 141mm

12.2 x 5.8 x 6 inches / 310 x 147 x 152mm

Connectivity

Bluetooth 6.0, 3.5mm, USB, microSD

Bluetooth 5.3

Bluetooth 5.4, 3.5mm

Battery life

30 hours

24 hours

Speaker drivers

Not stated

2 x 30W woofers, 2 x 20W tweeters

2x 30W woofers, 2x 10W tweeters

Waterproofing

IP67

JBL Xtreme 4
This one’s successor came out recently, so you can expect to see some price dips on the regular. I even spotted this model selling for less than £200 in the UK while writing this review, and that’s a truly exceptional price for this speaker. With phenomenal bass, great build quality, and a wide range of features, this model has everything you need. Read my full JBL Xtreme 4 review.

Tribit Stormbox Lava
Look, the Stormbox Lava isn’t perfect — it isn’t the most exciting-looking speaker, for instance. But for its incredibly low cost, it delivers very decent quality, with big bass output, relatively clean mids, and — with some tuning — controlled treble. It’s pretty powerful and has an IP67 waterproof rating, so it’s a nice pick for parties — both indoor and outdoor. Read my full Tribit Stormbox Lava review.

How I tested the Majority Move M4

(Image credit: Future)

Tested across a week-long period
Mainly streamed tracks via Tidal
Compared against similarly sized rivals

I spent hours testing the Majority Move M4 across a week-long period, and tested it in our dedicate music testing space at Future Labs.

For the most part, I streamed tunes using Tidal, but I dipped into Spotify from time to time as well. To begin with, I sifted through tracks in our TechRadar reference playlist, which features songs from a wide range of genres, but I also made sure to listen to a ton of tunes from my personal library as well.

More generally, I’ve spent years testing audio gear here at TechRadar, including a huge number of portable speakers — I even curated our guide to the very best Bluetooth speakers. I compared the M4 to rivals like the JBL Xtreme 4 and Tribit Stormbox Lava, which I personally tested, so I knew exactly how Majority’s speaker stacked up against the competition.

Read TechRadar’s reviews guarantee
First reviewed: June 2026

Categories: Reviews

I've spent over 30 hours customizing my ship, recruiting crew members, collecting bounties, and combating aliens in Starfield on PS5, and I've still barely scratched the surface of Bethesda's sci-fi RPG

Fri, 06/12/2026 - 17:00

If you're a gamer with a pulse, you may have noticed that a few new titles were announced at this year's Summer Game Fest. Of course, if you're a Bethesda Softworks stalwart who'd hoped the event would yield fresh intel on the game maker's next Fallout and Elder Scrolls entries, then, well, you may have been more disappointed than delighted by its many reveals.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PlayStation 5 Pro
Available on: Xbox Series X|S, PC, PS5
Release date: April 7, 2026

While both Fallout 76 and The Elder Scrolls Online shared peeks of future updates – and a Doom: The Dark Ages expansion was announced – details on the studio's most anticipated, long-awaited games were sadly a no-show. All that said, one of Bethesda's biggest, most ambitious efforts has recently been released on PlayStation platforms.

Arriving two-plus years after its exclusive launch on PC and Xbox Series X and Series S, sprawling sci-fi role-playing game Starfield has finally landed on Sony's systems…but with little fanfare. That's a bit surprising, as the 2023 role-playing game (RPG) is not only one of Bethesda's best original efforts in recent years, but one that has reserved its most polished, content-packed version for PlayStation 5 and PlayStation 5 Pro owners.

A Bethesda RPG, evolved

(Image credit: Bethesda Softworks)

If you're a new Constellation recruit, let's catch you up real quick. Starfield is a big, ambitious Bethesda RPG not unlike the studio's other staple series within the genre. While it's not exactly The Elder Scrolls in space, its systems-fueled gameplay, expansive open-world, and author-your-own-adventure formula will feel comfortably familiar to anyone who's sunk hours into the fantasy RPG series or the Fallout franchise.

Starfield essentially refines, polishes, and expands on those games' enduring formulas…then recruits you as a starship captain and hurtles you into the scary expanse of the cosmic frontier. As you might expect, there's plenty of enemies to eviscerate, massive progression paths to evolve, resources to gather, items to craft, factions to tangle with, mysteries to uncover, and so much more.

But as a galaxy-exploring, planet-hopping sci-fi RPG, you can also count on deep starship customization, crew member recruitment, dogfights among the stars, and ugly extraterrestrials looking to turn you to pulp. Starfield allows you to dig deep into all of these elements while also steering and shaping your journey, molding it to your playstyle and preference at every turn.

While you're certainly welcome to stick to the critical path and closely adhere to the game's narrative, it's at its best when you're fulfilling your own sci-fi fantasies – whether that's becoming a pistol-packing bounty hunter, peace-keeping diplomat, or just some dude who really digs collecting and customizing a fleet of cool starships.

A galaxy of updates and improvements

(Image credit: Bethesda Softworks)

Despite giving players the keys to a lightspeed-capable craft and encouraging them to author their own sci-fi epic, Starfield wasn't without its share of flaws when it was originally released. From empty-feeling planets and a confusing economy to clunky combat, sometimes sluggish travel, and an overall lack of charm and personality, it left some players as cold as deep space.

But like any ambitious AAA game with two-plus years' worth of updates, patches, and expansions in its rearview, Starfield has benefited from a spaceport full of improvements and polish since releasing in the summer of 2023. On top of countless quality-of-life tweaks, it's also seen several significant updates, like the awesome planet-roving REV-8 vehicle that makes exploring even the most boring expanses a rubber-burning blast.

(Image credit: Bethesda Softworks)

But Starfield's biggest update by far has nicely coincided with the game's PS5 release, leading to what Bethesda producer Tim Lamb called its "best version" in a recent interview with TechRadar. The substantial offering introduces a ton more tweaks, improvements, and even fresh content, from a powerful new resource that deepens customization to an adorable alien pet companion you can adopt.

The update's biggest game-changers, however, are its "Free Lanes" and "Cruise Mode" additions, which blow some of Starfield's more tedious elements out an airlock. Combined, these enhancements introduce seamless, smoother, and more satisfying space travel, allowing for easier planet-to-planet navigation, as well as the ability to manage many of the game's complex systems while casually cruising through the stars.

While this latest update will likely feel long overdue for existing fans, it's just an organic, out-of-the-box part of the experience for those earning their captain stripes in the PS5 version. Those same new recruits are also treated to the game's story-based expansions, Shattered Space and the more recent Terran Armada, which add hours of content and are included in the premium edition's $70 price.

Boldly going where previous versions have not

(Image credit: Bethesda Softworks)

In addition to all previous patches and enhancements – as well as the new update – PS5 players are treated to some Sony platform-specific features when they strap into the cockpit. Starfield doesn't skimp on the extras that smartly leverage the consoles' unique elements and – in the PlayStation 5 Pro's case – considerable horsepower.

PS5 players can choose between a graphics-favoring Visual mode and a frame-rate-focused Performance option. The former delivers 4K resolution – with PSSR upscaling doing some of the heavy lifting – at 30fps, while the latter ups the frames to 60-per-second at the cost of dropping the resolution to 1080p. The Pro also gets its own Enhanced mode, which further optimizes specific visual features, like foliage and draw distances, at 30fps.

I primarily played on the Pro, and found the Visual mode to offer the best overall experience, delivering fantastic fidelity and a peppy framerate that never felt compromised. I also found that the Pro's performance mode actually offered a slight visual bump over the base PS5's graphics mode. All that said, the game ran smoothly and looked great on the standard system.

Best bit

(Image credit: Bethesda Softworks)

No, Starfield is not a Star Wars game, but that tiny detail didn't keep me from becoming the best bounty hunter its Settled Systems had ever seen. The game encourages you to carve your own galaxy-spanning path, and that's just what I did – complete with a cool jetpack and lethal hand cannon. Toss in brimming bounty boards with targets just begging to be brought in, dead or alive, and Boba Fett has nothing on me.

More impressive is what the game accomplishes with the DualSense across all PS5 platforms. While plenty of ports take advantage of the controller's adaptive trigger and haptic feedback tech, Starfield goes above and beyond, fully integrating these features, but also leveraging the peripheral's light bar and built-in speaker to significantly up the immersion. The game ultimately serves as a great showcase of what the controller's unique features can bring to an interactive entertainment experience when fully utilized.

Much like Bethesda Softworks' PS5 port of Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, the studio's latest looks and plays better than ever on Sony's systems. But Starfield's PlayStation debut actually shares more with Obsidian Entertainment's Avowed, which arrived on PS5 consoles not only with the usual graphical and performance bumps, but also with a host of welcome updates and new content that made it the definitive version of the game.

Thanks to two-plus years of tweaks and enhancements – as well as a recent, significant update adding even more polish, improvements, and content – that's exactly what fans are getting with Starfield's latest release, a definitive experience that makes an already fantastic game out of this world.

Should I play Starfield on PS5?Play it if…

It felt a bit rough around the edges the first time around
While Starfield wasn't riddled with bugs upon release, it did suffer from a number of minor issues that have since been addressed via patches and updates. It now plays smoother, more seamlessly, and feels like a complete, polished experience on PS5.

You were waiting for the definitive edition
Starfield's PS5 release is the complete package, not only benefiting from two-plus years of fixes, patches, and polish, but also including all previously released content. In addition to a major new update addressing some of the game's most glaring issues, Starfield's $70 premium edition packs two full story expansions, including the new Terran Armada.

You want a game that leverages the PS5 Pro's power
More than a mere port, Starfield arrives on the PS5 Pro with three modes – Visual, Performance, and Enhanced – as well as full integration of the DualSense's unique features. If you're seeking the best looking – and performing – version of the game, while also wanting to experience the increased immersion the controller can deliver, you should dock your craft with the Pro.

Don’t play it if…

Starfield's setting, story, and characters didn't click with you before
Starfield's PlayStation 5 release benefits from a host of updates and improvements, but most apply primarily to the game's various systems and mechanics. While there's some fun new narrative elements to be found in the Terran Armada expansion, the game has not changed stylistically, with its story, setting, and characters remaining the same.

Accessibility

Starfield's accessibility features feel pretty bare bones, offering some standard options for adjusting audio settings, as well as different selections for subtitles, captions, and fonts.

There's plenty in the way of controller mapping options, but little depth in other areas. And some features that have become fairly standard, like color filter modes and other assists for visually-impaired players, are notably absent here.

How I reviewed Starfield on PS5

I spent 30-plus hours exploring, battling, and adventuring through Starfield's Settled Systems. During my time on planet surfaces and among the stars, I focused on the many updates the game has received since its launch, from its dozens of quality-of-life tweaks to its more significant inclusions and enhancements.

I also tested the various quality and performance modes on both my PS5 and PS5 Pro. Finally, I paid particular attention to how the game looked and played today – on Sony's consoles – versus how it felt when I first experienced it on my Xbox Series X. I played on my TCL 4K TV, with HDR enabled, using Sony's PlayStation Pulse Elite headset for audio.

First reviewed June 2026

Categories: Reviews

De’Longhi’s bean-to-cup coffee machine makes ‘a cornucopia of coffees’ — but, having tested it, I’ve found its hot and cold drinks are decent rather than exceptional

Fri, 06/12/2026 - 13:00

De’Longhi Eletta Ultra: two-minute review

The De’Longhi Eletta Ultra is a fully automatic bean-to-cup coffee machine. Not only does it offer a range of more than 50 drink presets, it's capable of cold extraction, enabling it to produce cold brew in just a few minutes. And with up to four user profiles, you can save your drink preferences for the morning, lunch or afternoon, ensuring your coffee is tailored to your taste at different times of day.

Not only is its 3.82 x 2.20 inch / 97 x 56mm touchscreen bright and crisp, it’s incredibly easy to navigate, making selecting your coffee a cinch. Thanks to its 1.9 quart / 1.8 liter water tank and 8.82oz / 250g bean hopper you can brew a fair few drinks before needing to top it up. Its design is a little boxy for my tastes but its clean lines and brushed metal finish means it will look relatively unobtrusive in most kitchens.

One of the first things that struck me about the Eletta Ultra is that it has an impressive array of features. First off, it has 52 different drinks presets, which is truly wild: that includes everything from a ristretto through a babyccino to cold extracted coffees like cold brew. It even offers regional specialities I’ve not seen from some of the best bean-to-cup coffee makers like the Portuguese galão or the heart-hammering black eye.

The vast majority of these presets are also customizable, allowing you to tweak things like their length, intensity or even add an extra shot, then save it to one of four personal profiles. Not only that but should you prefer a stronger coffee in the morning or a little bit less intensity in the afternoon the Eletta Ultra lets you save custom preferences to each profile for Morning, Lunchtime and Later in the Day. That’s an impressive level of personalization available.

But how does the De’Longhi Eletta Ultra perform? Well, it’s certainly got a decent engine under that hood. I found its boiler usually warms up in the morning within around 30 seconds, which is faster than a lot of bean-to-cup machines and a fraction of the time many prosumer devices take. And unlike some coffee makers, it doesn’t make an absolute din when in use; using a sound level meter, I clocked it at about 58dB, which is honestly very quiet compared to most of the competition.

(Image credit: Future)

Despite how easy the Eletta is to use on paper, it honestly took me quite a while to dial in the right settings — the machine felt a little mercurial at first, flipping straight from underextracting to overextracting as I refined the grind. Eventually though, I hit on the right grind size, intensity and length to start pulling consistent shots and the resulting espresso was certainly satisfying enough, albeit lacking a bit in some of the richness and full body I’d expect from a machine at this price.

I’m not an expert milk frother, I’ll readily admit, so I definitely appreciate how simple the Eletta Ultra makes steaming the white stuff. To whip up milky coffees, all I had to do was hook up the hot or cold carafe to match the drink I was making, set it to Light, Creamy or Thick and the machine did the rest. But while this made whipping up cappuccinos and lattes for my colleagues a snap, the resultant foam wasn’t quite as velvety smooth as from some machines, leaving some larger air bubbles intact.

One of the big draws of the Eletta Ultra for me is that cold extraction functionality. As someone who regularly has to spend an interminable 18 hours waiting for my home-made cold brew to steep, discovering I can make cold brew on demand is like a cat learning how a can opener works. But while the cold brew this machine extracts looks delightful, it’s far too watery for my tastes, lacking the complex fruitiness and natural sweetness I’ve come to expect from a great cold brew.

Fundamentally, if you’re looking for convenience or a cornucopia of different kinds of coffees, the De’Longhi Eletta Ultra is an appealing package. You can dial up your preferred take on a whole host of drinks in seconds and trust that you’ll get a pleasurable beverage out of it. But if you have exacting standards for your coffee, you might find it falls just a few inches short of the wonderfully extracted espresso a machine like the Breville Barista Touch Impress with Cold Extraction (known under the brand name Sage in the UK) can offer.

De’Longhi Eletta Ultra review: price & availability

Launched on February 26, 2026
Available in the UK but not yet in US or Australia
List price of £1,149.99 (around $1,550 / AU$2,260)

The De’Longhi Eletta Ultra in the UK on February 26, 2026 — it’s not yet available in either the US or Australia but given other Eletta models are available in those regions, it’s probably safe to assume it will make it there eventually.

Currently you can pick it up for a list price of £1,149.99 (around $1,550 / AU$2,260). As far as bean-to-cup machines go, that’s definitely up the pricier end of the market but it’s not excessive given its feature set. The similarly full-featured Breville Barista Touch Impress with Cold Extraction retails from $1,499.95 / £1,199.95 / AU$1,999, while the fully automatic Siemens EQ900 Plus has a list price of £2,199 (about $2,800 / AU$4,300). So the Eletta Ultra is roughly what I’d expect to pay for a machine of this spec.

(Image credit: Future)De’Longhi Eletta Ultra review: specs

Category

Specification

Type

Fully automatic bean-to-cup espresso machine

Dimensions

14.96 x 9.25 x 17.91 inches / 380 x 235 x 455mm

Weight

24.14 lbs / 10.95 kg

Water tank capacity

1.9 quarts / 1.8 liters

Steam wand

No (Includes automatic LatteCrema Hot & Cool milk carafes / Hot water spout)

Max pressure

19 bar

(Image credit: Future)De’Longhi Eletta Ultra review: design

52 drink presets that can be customised across four profiles
Bright, easy-to-navigate touchscreen display
Fairly unremarkable looks

The De’Longhi Eletta Ultra is a big machine without necessarily being hulking — at a size of 9.25 x 17.91 x 14.96 inches / 235 x 455 x 380mm, I’d say it appears slap bang in the middle of the best bean-to-cup coffee makers. And it’s similarly average in terms of its capacity: you can fit up to 1.9 quarts / 1.8 liters into the Eletta Ultra’s water tank, meaning you should get a fair few brews out of it before you have to refill it.

Meanwhile, loading its hopper could not be easier — you can squeeze up to 8.82oz / 250g of beans into it just by pouring them into the top of the machine. My only slight reservation here is I generally like to mix and match my beans from day to day and these kinds of integrated hoppers are almost impossible to empty, which stands in sharp contrast to machines with a screw-in hopper like the Breville Oracle Touch. You can at least add a dose of grounds in the chute at the front of the hopper should you fancy a one-off taste of something different.

When it comes to aesthetics, I find the Eletta Ultra clean and sharp, if a bit bland. On the one hand, its 3.82 x 2.20 inch / 97 x 56mm touchscreen display is impressively bright and detailed, making swiping through settings and drinks profiles a breeze, while its metallic finish certainly would fit in well with most kitchens. However, its looks are a little boxy for my taste and I prefer the more traditional barista-style look offered by something like the Breville Oracle Touch or Ninja Luxe Café.

(Image credit: Future)

As this is a fully automatic bean-to-cup machine, there’s not really a huge number of additional accessories you need — the huge toolkit of portafilters, tamps and brushes that manual machines ship with doesn’t really apply. However, the Eletta Ultra does come with warm and cold milk-steaming carafes, ensuring your hot drinks stay piping hot and your cold drinks don’t come out lukewarm.

One thing the De’Longhi Eletta Ultra does have in spades, however, is features. It offers an almost overwhelming selection of drinks, with 52 available in total — whether you fancy classics like an espresso or a flat white, regional specialties like milchkaffee or cafe con leche or even cold drinks like cold brew or iced cappuccino, you should find your ideal tipple here. And, as is increasingly common with automatic machines, each of these is fully customizable, allowing you to set your ideal length and intensity and save them to one of four personalized profiles.

(Image credit: Future)

But the smart features don’t stop there. De’Longhi’s Bean Sense feature is designed to help you get the best out of your beans; dial in whether you’re using Arabica or a blend, your bean roast level, current grinder level and the Eletta Ultra will pour a test espresso, before tweaking its boiler temperature and suggesting the ideal grind to tailor extraction to your coffee. Additionally, each personalized profile allows you to tweak your settings for three different times of day — you can save different preferences for individual drinks for Morning, Lunchtime and Later in the Day.

I definitely appreciated being able to tailor my coffee this way. My tastes tend bolder for most drinks, so I liked being able to set the intensity and boiler temperature a little higher for my personalised versions, while there’s no version of me throughout the multiverse that would drink a cold brew in any size that isn’t large. While my biggest shift from AM to PM — the fact I switch from caffeine to decaf — isn’t something a machine without dual or interchangeable hoppers can cater to, I can see for a lot of people it would be useful to add extra shots earlier or dial down the intensity later. So all-in-all, I’ve got a lot of praise for the De’Longhi’s feature set.

Design score: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)De’Longhi Eletta Ultra review: performance

Heats up fast and runs quiet
Produces competent but not exceptional coffee
Super easy to use and clean

Producing your favorite coffees using the De’Longhi Eletta Ultra is an absolute breeze. Punching in your preferences and selecting your brew really only requires a few taps and swipes, which is fantastically convenient when you’re in a hurry. And the range of drinks available is impressive. But I do think some of this breadth comes at the expense of producing core coffees with substantial depth of flavor.

Heating up the Eletta Ultra’s boiler for the first time took around 30 seconds. That’s pretty fast, all told, with many machines of its ilk taking closer to a minute, although some would argue it’s worth allowing these machines a little longer to fully warm their components. De’Longhi has also made a lot of noise (ironically) about how much quieter the Eletta Ultra is than other machines — and it is not wrong. Using a sound level meter, I clocked it at roughly 58dB, which is a fair margin quieter than a lot of machines I’ve tested.

Quick though the machine is to run, it can take a little longer to optimize its output. I’m used to a bit of dialling in when first getting used to the quirks of a coffee machine but I did find the Eletta Ultra more idiosyncratic than even the most eccentric barista.

The first shot I poured was massively underextracted: it had a beige crema and I could see the bottom of the mug, which does not scream ‘rich espresso’ to me. After refining the grind in stages, I managed to get it from Miller Lite flavorlessness to the level of gas station coffee, where it was running a little too fast and still not quite hitting enough pressure to eke out more robust flavors. But when I upped the intensity and dropped the length of the shot to 30ml, it started dribbling out… then stalled entirely. The only way I could get it to extract properly again was slowly increasing the coarseness of the grind until I ended up back where I started.

(Image credit: Future)

Weirdly, at this point, the Eletta Ultra began extracting pretty decent coffee. Even with a relatively cheap supermarket brand of beans, it started pouring rich, consistent espresso with that nice buff-color crema I’m used to. Trying it out with some mid-range beans, Pact’s Decaf Casa Loma, the resultant espresso was a pleasant caramel flavor with a velvety mouthfeel. Don’t get me wrong — it’s not quite the powerful punch I’ve come to expect from some manual machines but it’s not bad either.

Milk-based drinks were a similar story. I whipped up a range of drinks for some of my colleagues down at TechRadar’s testing labs, including a cappuccino, a macchiato and a flat white. The process could not be more straightforward: once you’ve selected your drink profile, all you need to do is set the hot or cold milk carafe to either Light, Creamy or Thick and it will pump out frothy milk to order. But the general reception to these drinks was good rather than great — for example, the cappuccino foam landed slightly on the frothy side, with slightly too large bubbles to create a beautifully smooth foam.

As a big cold brew drinker, I was most excited about trying out the Eletta Ultra’s cold extraction presets. And it does produce some absolutely gorgeous-looking cold brew — pumping out a little at a time, it produces a subtle gradient from light to dense toward the bottom of the glass. But when I made my first batch, the ice was fully melted by the time the machine had finished pouring, suggesting it’s more lukewarm brew than truly cold. And I honestly wasn’t wowed by the finished product — I’ll admit that my standards for cold brew are Gordon-Ramsey-esque so it is a high bar to clear but, even on intense mode, it lacked the smooth, fruity potency I’ve come to expect from my cold coffee.

(Image credit: Future)

As someone who spends half his time tweaking variables to get the best out of his beans, I could definitely see the allure of the Eletta Ultra’s Bean Sense tech. However, I sometimes found in practice that, far from improving the coffee, the settings it selected marred its flavor. For example, because I was using a relatively dark roast, the Bean Sense process automatically set the boiler temperature to medium and recommended I used a coarser grind — but this just led the coffee to taste weak and underextracted. I’m sure it sometimes offers useful insights but if you have a specific flavor profile in mind, you may find yourself overruling it as much as you do following its guidance.

Keeping the Eletta Ultra clean is a breeze, although a full, internal clean is a slightly more involved process. In regular use, you really only need to remember to empty its purged coffee grounds box each day and it automatically purges its steam wand after every use. For a more thorough clean, its drip tray and milk carafes can be disassembled and washed by hand or in a dishwasher, while the water tank requires cleaning by hand. Deep cleaning requires cleaning tabs but the machine will provide a QR code for ordering them and guide you through the steps on screen.

All told, I think the Eletta Ultra’s approach to coffee is workmanlike, rather than artisanal. It’s able to produce a fantastic array of drinks with very little fuss and it’ll knock you up a well-constructed coffee without an enormous investment on your part. But you’re getting a townhouse, not the Guggenheim, and so you need to set your expectations accordingly.

Performance score: 3.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)Should I buy the De’Longhi Eletta Ultra?

Attribute

Notes

Score

Value

The De’Longhi Eletta Ultra isn’t exactly cheap but, for a fully automatic bean-to-cup machine with cold extraction, its price is pretty reasonable.

4/5

Design

Huge variety of drink presets, personalised profiles, hot and cold extraction, smart features, medium capacity. Not the most stylish design but it’s also pretty inoffensive.

4.5/5

Performance

Super easy to use. Extracted coffee good rather than great; not the smoothest milk foam; cold brew a little on the weak side. Warms up fast, runs quiet. Easy to keep clean.

3.5/5

Buy it if…

You want a huge array of personalised drinks
With 52 different drink presets that you can tailor your way for different times of the day, there’s a staggering range of drinks available to you at the tap of a screen.

You value convenience above all else
Using the Eletta Ultra is simplicity itself. Even your most technologically averse relative can easily chuck some milk in the carafe, tap their preferred beverage and be enjoying their fave coffee in around a minute.

Don’t buy it if…

You want the best coffee for your buck
Convenient though the Eletta Ultra is, you’ll likely get a more flavor-packed coffee if you either switch to a similarly priced semi-automatic machine or invest more cash in a higher-grade fully automatic machine.

You’re a cold-brew fan
Okay, the cold brew the Eletta Ultra produces takes two minutes, rather than 24 hours. But honestly the low and slow method can achieve better results, meaning it still might be the best route to the natural sweetness you’re looking for.

De’Longhi Eletta Ultra review: also consider

De’Longhi Eletta Ultra

Breville Barista Touch Impress with Cold Extraction

Smeg BCC13

Type

Fully automatic bean-to-cup espresso machine

Semi-automatic espresso machine

Fully automatic bean-to-cup espresso machine

Dimensions

14.96 x 9.25 x 17.91 inches / 380 x 235 x 455mm

13.4 x 14.2 x 16.3 inches / 340 x 360 x 415mm

13.2 x 7 x 17 inches / 336 x 180 x 433mm

Weight

24.14 lbs / 10.95kg

24.18 lbs / 10.97kg

20 lbs / 9kg

Water tank capacity

1.9 quarts / 1.8 liters

2.1 quarts / 2 liters

1.48 quarts / 1.4 liters

Steam wand

No (Includes automatic LatteCrema Hot & Cool milk carafes / Hot water spout)

Yes (Automatic and manual AutoMilq steam wand)

No (Includes automatic milk carafe system via removable milk tube)

Max pressure

19 bar

9 bar

19 bar

Breville Barista Touch Impress with Cold Extraction
While the Breville Barista Touch Impress with Cold Extraction isn’t fully automatic, it makes every step of the process significantly easier with its lever-operated tamping system and AutoMilq system. It also guides you through the dosing of your coffee and picking the perfect grind size, helping you gradually improve your coffee-making skills — no wonder it’s currently sat at the top of our guide to the best coffee makers. Read our full Breville Barista Touch Impress with Cold Extraction review.

Smeg BCC13
If you have zero interest in how the sausage coffee is made and just want well-extracted coffee on demand, the Smeg BCC13 is a much more affordable option. There’s absolutely zero variables to tweak — you don’t even need to worry about dialling in the right grind size. You literally just tap your desired drink and off you go. Its automated milk steaming isn’t great at handling plant milks though, so if anyone in your household prefers a cow-free coffee, this machine might not be for you. Read our full Smeg BCC13 review.

(Image credit: Future)How I tested the De’Longhi Eletta Ultra review

Tested it over several weeks
Created and customized a range of drinks
Tried it out with a range of different beans

I tested the De’Longhi Eletta Ultra over a period of several weeks. After calibrating the machine’s boiler temperature and grind size by extracting multiple shots of espresso, I tested out its capabilities by brewing a wide range of drinks, including espressos, Americanos, lattes, cappuccinos and cold brew. I also tried it with a range of beans, from mass-market supermarket beans to higher-quality microlot coffee.

On top of this, I tested many of its smart features. Not only did I experiment with creating personalized settings for each drink, changing its length, intensity and number of shots, but I also tried out the De’Longhi’s Bean Sense feature to see how it impacted multiple different drinks. Finally, I measured the Eletta Ultra’s noise output when extracting coffee with a sound level meter.

In terms of my own experience, I’ve been a daily coffee drinker for more than 20 years. I’ve experimented with countless different brewing methods during that time, whether that’s manual espresso, a stove-top moka pot, an Aeropress or cold brewed in mason jars. When it comes to testing experience, I’ve been reviewing and writing about tech for over a decade.

First reviewed: June 2026
For more details, see how we test, review, and rate products at TechRadar.

Categories: Reviews

Arzopa Z3FC review: An ultra-light and thin portable monitor that's perfectly balanced for work and play

Fri, 06/12/2026 - 12:02

Arzopa Z3FC: 30-second review

Ultra-thin, ultra-lightweight, high-resolution. There are plenty of reasons why the Arzopa Z3FC is an attractive display for those looking for an easily portable monitor for work and play.

I was thrilled with the overall performance. On-screen images look sharp and clear in 2.5K, and in my gaming tests, it handled 120Hz refresh rates with ease. I even found myself missing the sleek second screen when it wasn’t sitting on my desk.

You get everything you need in the box, including USB-C data and power cables, and a mini HDMI to HDMI lead. There’s also a protective case which is a little too light-gray for my tastes, but does a good job of protecting the screen if you’re stashing the display in a backpack.

Now, it’s not entirely perfect. The main point of issue is color coverage - at 107% sRGB, it’s fine for most people but not creative professionals.

There’s no battery built in here, so playing games means you’ll need your own power source - easily remedied, but worth pointing out. I also found with HDR on, the Switch 2 had a very washed-out, overly bright appearance. Turn it off for best results.

And honestly, some may not need a portable monitor that’s running at around $150 or so when there are perfectly serviceable $50 displays out there. But for the price, I appreciated the thin, lightweight design, the sharp display, and how neatly it sat on my desk every day throughout the review process.

Whenever I’m reviewing a product, I always think: Would I buy this again if I needed to? The answer here is, an unreserved yes. And just to put my money where my mouth is, I’m ordering a second one for my wife, who fell in love with the portability. She says it’s to stay productive while working from home, but I suspect it’s so she can play even more Stardew Valley.

(Image credit: Future)Arzopa Z3FC: Pricing & availability

The Arzopa Z3FC is widely available, and you’re looking at a display for around $150-ish, if you can catch it on a deal.

For example, you can grab it direct from Arzopa in the US, where it’s currently $145 (was $360 - although I can’t tell when it was ever this price). On the global Arzopa site, it’s £126 (was £320, but again, I’m not sure when because that seems like a very high price to me).

At time of review, it’s also discounted to $145 at Amazon.com and £130 at Amazon.com.

Those sale prices feel about right for a 16-inch portable monitor with these specs - it’s not ultra-cheap, but it’s not as maddeningly expensive as some similar displays I’ve seen. I probably wouldn’t recommend the Z3FC if it actually was over $300. But at this price, it’s an easy recommendation.

Arzopa Z3FC: Design & buildFutureFutureFutureArzopa Z3FC: Specs

Panel size: 16.1-inch

Panel type: IPS

Resolution: 2560 x 1440

Brightness: 400 nits

Contrast: 1000:1

Pixel response:

Refresh rate: 180Hz (DP), 144HZ (HDMI)

HDR: HDR 10

Color coverage: 107% sRGB

Connectivity: 2x USB-C , 1x mini HDMI

VESA: No

Weight: 1.72 lb (780g)

Dimensions: 14.41 × 8.98 × 0.37 in (366 x 228 x 9.3mm)

MacBook-esque gray in color, the Z3FC is built from aluminum alloy that feels nice in the hand. It’s cool to the touch, but not exactly durable - it’s still got that hollow plastic-type sensation when you drum your fingers against it, and I’d recommend pairing it with the modestly padded sleeve that comes with the device. Still, it looks good and doesn’t feel cheap like a lot of portable monitors do.

One of the first things I noticed during the unboxing was just how light this display was. You can carry this one-handed without any problems at all. It’s tablet-thin, too, which makes transporting this around so much easier. If you’re the type of professional (or gamer) intending to use this across multiple locations, it’s absolutely perfect for that.

To the rear, there’s a built-in kick-stand - a strip of tabbed metal that allows for a range of viewing angles. When I pushed it into place, it fell with a satisfying clunk (or, more accurately, thunk). There are also two rubber feet on the base for when it’s in position.

Running along the right side are the power and OSD buttons, and a volume rocker. Beneath these are the mini HDMI and two USB-C ports thoughtfully placed near the bottom of the screen, so the cables can trail directly onto the desk. The portable monitor also sports a small speaker on either side.

There’s no built-in battery here - not a huge surprise, as not many portable monitors have these, which helps keep costs and weight low. That means it’ll draw power from whichever device it’s connected to. Not a deal-breaker for most, I imagine, but some may be disappointed, so it’s worth highlighting.

Alongside the monitor and sleeve, inside the box I was pleased to find two USB-C to USB-C cables - one is for power-only, while the cable with an angled connector is for display - and a mini HDMI to HDMI cable. Pleasingly, each of these are braided in an on-brand gray with a velcro cable tidy, so should be more durable if you’re jamming them into your backpack for work.

Arzopa Z3FC: PerformanceFutureFuture

However nice the Z3FC is to look at - and it is undeniably a good-looking portable display - the real test is how well it performs.

I started by hooking up this monitor to my beloved ThinkPad T14s. It all worked flawlessly, although depending on the laptop or computer you use, you may need to tweak some of the display settings, given the Z3FC’s 2.5K resolution and 180Hz/144Hz refresh rates.

In any case, I had no issues here. Everything connected precisely as it should. Documents and images looked clear, text appeared crisp. Pairing the Z3FC with the usual suite of office apps for business use is simply ideal (and to prove it, I wrote this entire review using this second screen).

You can easily switch between landscape and portrait mode if you’re working in longer windows. This was how I generally tested the monitor, flipping it to portrait mode to save me tabbing between different windows while working, taking calls, and generally staying productive. If this is your main use-case, I found that workflow a treat.

The only problem I had here - and this is most definitely a ‘me issue’ - was switching between the 16:10 aspect ratio of the laptop screen and the 16:9 ratio of the portable monitor display. But I adjusted to this relatively quickly.

At 107% sRGB, color coverage limits its use for creative professionals. Sure, it’s fine as a second monitor for creating digital images, or for working on assets on the go - it’s so lightweight that it positively demands that sort of use. However, you’ll want to use a proper color-accurate display for higher-resolution workloads and finalizing any finished products.

Next, I wanted to test out its gaming prowess. The Z3FC boasts a 180Hz refresh rate using DP (and 144Hz via HDMI). And while I don’t have frame-rate tracking software here, I do have a 120Hz TV to compare results.

I connected it to a Nintendo Switch, an Xbox Series X, and the Nintendo Switch 2. If it can handle gaming alongside office tasks, I’m thinking, then we could be looking at a new entry in my guide to the best portable monitors.

But first, a note: Since the Z3FC has no built-in battery, you’ll need to plug the USB-C power cable into an outlet or use a power bank. I just hooked up an Anker Zolo into the second USB-C port and that worked fine.

I began this part of the test with the original Switch. This worked instantly, as expected - the Switch is a joy for this. It’s very playable, if a little blurry due to the Switch’s hardware limitations.

This was the first time I got to hear the monitor’s built-in speakers. And, do you know what? They’re surprisingly good. They’ll never beat proper external speakers or a pair of headphones, and they can be harsh at louder volumes, but they have more depth than some I’ve used.

(Image credit: Future)

Next, I moved on to the Nintendo Switch 2. Here, things are a bit trickier - and that’s down to Nintendo, not Arzopa. To play, you’ll need to dock the console, connect via HDMI, and add your own external power supply. With that set-up, gaming proved straightforward. And yes, to my eye, Metroid Prime 4: Beyond ran at 120Hz in performance mode. So, that’s a win.

What wasn’t a win, though, was just how washed-out the HDR is here. No amount of adjustment would change that, and I recommend switching it off entirely here.

Lastly, as a completionist, I tried the Xbox Series X. With HDR-compatible games, I experienced none of the problems I did on the Switch 2. Everything worked just as it should.

So, yes, as a portable monitor ready to split its time for professional and personal use, it largely delivers on its promise. Not the best for gaming by any stretch, but more than capable.

Finally a quick word about the OSD. There’s a dedicated button to bring this up, and while it’s pretty intuitive to use, it still feels a little clunky navigating the menus. The OSD button acts as enter/confirm, the volume rockers for selecting options, while a quick press of the power button takes you back a step. It’s not what I’d call a hardship, but it’s not the quickest set-up when diving through all the menus.

Should I buy the Should I buy the Arzopa Z3FC?Buy it if...

✅ You travel a lot: One of the reasons I love this screen is just how lightweight it is, considering it's a 16-inch display. If you're using it for business travel or playing games on the go, I can't fault it.

✅ You want to use your screen for work and play: I used the Z3FC throughout the working day and it made a real difference to my workflow. Then, after clocking off, I could set up my Switch downstairs and play there. The 180Hz/144Hz refresh rate is a great bonus.

Don't buy it if...

❌ You're a professional content creator: While I found it suitable for editing images for use online, if your work demands pure color accuracy, this display doesn't fit the bill, covering just 107% sRGB.

❌ You don't have a nearby power source: There's no built in battery here, which keeps things lightweight and costs lower, but does mean you'll need to hook it up to the mains or use a power bank to use it with consoles and mobile devices.

For more options, we've also reviewed the best business monitors you can get right now.

Categories: Reviews

I love how much you can tweak the new Razer Huntsman — it's just a shame that you can't make full use of its precise analog switches

Fri, 06/12/2026 - 04:48

Razer Huntsman V3 Tenkeyless 8KHz: One-minute review

The Razer Huntsman V3 Tenkeyless 8KHz is one of the brand’s new flagship gaming keyboards. It features analog switches with huge customization potential, designed to meet the exacting requirements of esport professionals.

It has a simple and basic form, although there are few touches that add a little flair. The shiny, brushed top plate and high floating keycaps are sleek, while the bright but subtle RGB lighting adds some much needed color.

It’s also light and compact, but very solid at the same time. The materials feel premium, with the Doubleshot PBT keycaps being the highlight. Some might not like their prominent graining, but to me they’re among the best gaming keyboard caps around in terms of texture.

(Image credit: Future)

Razer’s Synapse software has a smorgasbord of options to play around with. There are plenty of rebinding options and performance-related settings, including in-depth Rapid Trigger, Snap Tap, and controller emulation features, to name a few. The app is clear and easy to use, although I did experience a few minor issues with settings failing to take hold at certain points, although these are ultimately fixable.

The optical switches in the Huntsman V3 lack the dampening or clickiness of other boards, and can feel a little harsh at times. This is especially evident when typing, which is also made difficult by the sheer height of the keycaps themselves. Overall, though, they’re still pleasant to use, and the smooth and easy travel of the keys makes them effective when gaming.

The analog performance is also smooth and precise. However, there’s a lack of feel and feedback at the top of each key’s travel. Press further down, though, and you’re met with more resistance, which provides more control when attempting to hit certain actuation points, or when emulating controller sticks and triggers.

With its sub-$200 price point, the Huntsman V3 represents good value considering all that it offers. There are very strong contenders in the analog gaming keyboard space, but the Huntsman V3 acquits itself just well enough to justify its place among them.

(Image credit: Future)Razer Huntsman V3 Tenkeyless 8KHz review: Price and availability

$169.99 / £169.99 / AU$299.95
Available now in one color
Decent price for an analog board

The Razer Huntsman V3 Tenkeyless 8KHz costs $169.99 / £169.99 / AU$299.95 and is available now in black only. The keycaps are removable, but the switches aren’t.

This is a decent price for an analog keyboard, especially one with as many software tweaks as the Huntsman V3 features. The SteelSeries Apex Pro TKL Gen 3, for instance, has a considerably higher list price, although we have seen it with significant discounts lately, bringing it closer in line with the Huntsman V3. The Apex Pro is a truly phenomenal board, with a superior build and performance to that of the Huntsman V3. It doesn’t have as many analog tweaks, though.

For a more budget option, there’s the Turtle Beach Vulcan 2 TKL Pro. Like the Huntsman V3, this also has plenty of analog adjustments and features, including controller emulation. However, I found its analog performance inferior, lacking the same levels of precision and control as the Huntsman V3.

Value score: 4 / 5

Razer Huntsman V3 Tenkeyless 8KHz review: Specs

Layout

TKL

Switch

Razer Analog Optical Switch Gen-2

Programmable keys

Yes

Dimensions

14.2 x 5.5 x 1.5 inches / 362 x 140 x 38mm

RGB or backlighting

Yes (customizable)

(Image credit: Future)Razer Huntsman V3 Tenkeyless 8KHz review: Design and features

Light and compact board
Tall floating keycaps
Wealth of settings in Synapse

The Huntsman V3 has a basic appearance, although a few touches set it apart. The aluminum faceplate has a shiny finish with a brushed effect, which is subtle but may still prove divisive. The prominent floating keycaps lend it a healthy dose of sleek minimalism.

The RGB lighting is reasonably subtle, only shining through the keycap characters, although a small amount does leak between the gaps. It’s quite bright, and there are numerous options for customizing patterns.

It’s quite a light and compact board, but it feels surprisingly solid at the same time. There’s very little flex and all materials feel premium. This includes the Doubleshot PBT keycaps; their prominent graining is satisfying to touch and also helps with traction. Again, though, this mightn’t be to every gamer’s taste, given that many keycaps are super smooth.

While the board itself is quite thin, it actually feels a lot thicker, thanks to the height at which the keycaps float above it, as well as the tallness of the keycaps themselves.

However, the tilt angle provided by the feet does help to make it more comfortable to reach the keys. There are two sets of feet which offer meaningful differences in angle.

You’ll find the USB-C port on the back left of the unit. It’s deeply recessed, which makes it a little more difficult to connect and disconnect, but this small inconvenience is a fair trade-off for the security it provides.

To customize the Huntsman V3, you’ll need to download Razer’s Synapse software. This has an impressive gamut of adjustments. There are plenty of remapping options, including a wealth of Windows and media controls you can assign to keys. You can also assign up to four inputs to a single key, each triggering depending on how far down you press.

(Image credit: Future)

Like many modern gaming keyboards, there’s a Snap Tap function, letting you assign priority to a single key when two are pressed simultaneously. There are various options here, with different types of priority to choose from. There’s also a Snap Flex feature, which allows you to bind a second input to a key that triggers when you release it. This can be assigned on up to four different keys.

Then there are the analog settings, which again are very extensive. Aside from being able to adjust the actuation point for each key between 0.1mm and 4mm, there’s also a Rapid Trigger function with independent upstroke and downstroke sliders, each with ranges between 0.1mm and 1mm. You can even enable Continuous Rapid Trigger.

There’s a controller emulation mode, too, allowing you to assign gamepad inputs to your keys. This includes trigger and stick inputs, where you can also adjust their curve profile to set their response and sensitivity to your liking.

Controller inputs are easy to assign, in part thanks to the ability to assign multiple common mappings with a single click. For instance, there’s an option to assign the left stick to the WASD keys. A simple but useful visualizer attends the controller section, showing trigger and stick behaviours in real time with your presses.

Aside from being able to create your own profiles, Synapse features some useful preset profiles, including those designed for certain games. For example, the Racing profile binds gamepad triggers and joysticks to the WASD keys. These profiles can be selected via Fn shortcuts, and there are hotkeys for other performance-related functions, too.

Synapse is clearly laid out and features helpful explanations and tutorials. It’s fast and smooth, although I did experience a few minor bugs. For instance, the keyboard passthrough feature for controller emulation, which allows keys not bound to controller inputs to work as normal, failed to work on occasion. However, a simple replug of the USB cable seemed to remedy the issue.

Design and features score: 4 / 5

(Image credit: Future)Razer Huntsman V3 Tenkeyless 8KHz review: Performance

Precise analog response
Slight harsh and numb keys
Not great for typing

The keys in the Huntsman V3 are more clicky than thocky, although they feel less sharp than the clickiest switches out there. Their sound is both lower in pitch and quieter than many mechanical models, too.

They don’t have much dampening, which can make the board feel a little harsh at times. This is especially evident when typing — and the act isn’t made any easier by the thick keycaps, their elevated height, and the absence of a dip in the middle row. This combination makes gliding around the keys tricky, and it also causes some discomfort, owing to the angle at which you have to bend your wrists to reach them.

Thankfully, I was more comfortable when gaming in the WASD position. The keys are comfortably spaced, while the space bar and other peripheral keys are easy to reach.

The standout aspect of the Huntsman V3’s performance, though, is its analog response. It’s very precise and sensitive, reacting very well to different levels of pressure, which in turn gives you a broad range of control.

However, this precision is somewhat undermined by the lack of feel in the keys themselves. They don’t provide as much feedback as I would've liked, which can make it a little tricky to dial in the exact amount of pressure to hit certain actuation points or make smooth adjustments when emulating triggers and sticks.

What's more, there’s a small but noticeable amount of wobble to the keys, which means presses don’t feel particularly secure. Thankfully, though, most of the analog issues I’ve outlined only pertain to the top of presses; once you press further down, more resistance is generated from the springs, which allows for much smoother and more granular control.

Performance score: 3.5 / 5

Should I buy the Razer Huntsman V3 Tenkeyless 8KHz?Scorecard

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

Not many analog keyboards are cheaper than this, especially those that offer this many features.

4 / 5

Design and features

Compact, light, and well made. The Synapse software provides copious options and it’s mostly stable, bar a few minor issues.

4 / 5

Performance

The analog response from the switches is great, although the actual control you get from presses is less so. Not a great board for typing, either.

3.5 / 5

Overall rating

The Huntsman V3 packs in many features and it mostly delivers on the performance front, aside from a slight lack of feedback. For the price, the Huntsman V3 is a competent gaming keyboard.

3.5 / 5

Buy it if…

You want plenty of adjustments
I haven't seen an analog keyboard with this many adjustments, and the software for tweaking them is easy to use.

You want a good analog performance
The analog response is smooth and precise, which makes it ideal for all kinds of games.

Don't buy it if…

You want great key feedback
The keys are a little numb at the top of their travel, which might deter those looking for the finest of movements.

You’ll be typing a lot
The height and the thickness of the keycaps make the Huntsman V3 a chore to type on.

Razer Huntsman V3 Tenkeyless 8KHz review: Also consider

SteelSeries Apex Pro TKL Gen 3
Still one of my favorite analog keyboards, the performance and build quality of the Apex Pro are hard to beat. It doesn’t have as many adjustments as the Huntsman V3, and misses out on controller emulation entirely, but in terms of pure analog feel, it’s a hard board to beat. Read our full SteelSeries Apex Pro TKL Gen 3 review.

Turtle Beach Vulcan 2 TKL Pro
A more budget-friendly analog board, the Vulcan 2 TKL Pro still has plenty of features, including controller emulation. However, its analog response isn’t as precise as the Huntsman V3’s, nor is its build quite as strong, but it’s not a bad pick for those looking to save. Read our full Turtle Beach Vulcan 2 TKL Pro review.

How I tested the Razer Huntsman V3 Tenkeyless 8KHz

(Image credit: Future)

Tested for several days
Used many features
Extensive gaming keyboard experience

I tested the Razer Huntsman V3 Tenkeyless 8KHz for several days, during which time I used it for gaming, working, and general use.

I played games such as Subnautica 2, which makes use of the typical first-person keys, from WASD and the number keys to the space bar and control and shift keys. I also played games that allowed me to make use of the Huntsman V3’s controller emulation, such as Assetto Corsa, by using W and S to emulate triggers and A and D in place of the left stick.

I’ve been PC gaming for over a decade, and have used a number of keyboards in that time. I’ve also reviewed a large number of them, including other Razer models.

Read TechRadar’s reviews guarantee
First reviewed: June 2026

Categories: Reviews

Corsair Galleon 100 SD review: Stream Deck meets K70, complete with all the bells and whistles

Thu, 06/11/2026 - 06:55

Corsair Galleon 100 SD one minute review

I still don't quite know what to make of Corsair's Galleon 100 SD gaming keyboard. On the one hand, the ethos of this thing, the switches, the design, the implementation are generally very well thought out, and it's solidly built too.

Sound-dampening is decent, the linear MLX switches are delightful to type on, and the Stream Deck integration on the right-hand panel gives the whole thing a lot more versatility than you first might think.

Whereas before your Stream Deck buttons sat beside your monitor, the Galleon 100 SD brings them within reach, taking up that numpad position instead. That makes it a more natural flow while you're gaming and streaming at the same time.

That's a long-winded way of saying you can actually use all of the Stream Deck's vast utility in-game, finally, without stretching halfway across your desk to do it. Not only can you have all of those macros and keybinds added into the numpad directly, with visual indicators as to what they actually do, but the display element gives you key system stats while you do it.

The bigger issue lies in the absolute bonanza of software you need to get this thing running. The Galleon, by default, requires two separate programs to fully function. Corsair's Web Hub, a PWA interface (or website effectively) that replaces the desktop iCUE app, allowing you to change your lighting, keybinds, polling rate, all with a lightweight web page rather than a full-blown software suite. And then the standalone desktop Stream Deck app, which you need to configure, well, the Stream Deck.

(Image credit: Future)

The worst part about that is that the Galleon's not backwards compatible with iCUE directly, and similarly, a lot of the "legacy" Corsair hardware hasn't made its way to the Web Hub either yet (there's a promise it's coming, but nothing confirmed). So, if you're running RGB lighting with some older fans, or a different mouse that isn't supported by Web Hub, you're effectively running iCUE, Web Hub, and the Stream Deck app to keep all of your Corsair products in line, and that just feels messy.

Then there's the price. It isn't cheap, by any measure. Yes, you are technically getting a full Stream Deck in here as well, so there's that to bear in mind, but it's near enough $100 more than the likes of Corsair's Makr Pro line (a markedly better keyboard if your sole aim is gaming).

It's a good board, and if you're not phased by the ludicrous software setup and the price tag, you'll get along with it just fine. Arguably for many, that expanded Stream Deck utility might make it one of the best gaming keyboards you could buy. But you really need to be able to justify what you gain from the Stream Deck itself. If you hesitate even for a moment on that thought, you might be better off looking elsewhere.

Corsair Galleon 100 SD review: Price & availability

Priced astonishingly high for a standard mechanical keyboard
Available globally today
Only worth it if the Stream Deck is for you

Perhaps the biggest talking point of the Galleon 100 SD is that price tag. $350 and £310 (around AU$500) for a keyboard of this magnitude is a tough pill to swallow, particularly because at its bare bones, the keyboard itself doesn't really outclass boards a third of the cost.

Like yes, the MLX switches are lush to type on, pre-lubed, and there's plenty of sound dampening going on here, but those aren't exactly Corsair exclusives, and you can find a number of full-size boards from other manufacturers that feature exactly that, for a lot less.

Now, yes, of course, you do get that Stream Deck baked into the side here, sacrificing a full numpad for it (although technically that is a function that's available with a quick profile swap), but if you've already got a Stream Deck in any form, it's quite hard to justify the extra cost.

Value: 3/5

(Image credit: Future)Corsair Galleon 100 SD review: Specs

Price

$349.99 / £309.99 / AU$599

Layout

Full-size "Extended"

Switch

Corsair MLX Pulse

Switch specs

45g actuation; 2.0mm actuation point; 3.6mm travel; 80M keystrokes

Keycaps

Shine-through PBT

Dimensions

448 × 159 × 42mm (17.6 × 6.3 × 1.65")

Connectivity

Wired USB-A; 2× USB 2.0 Type-C passthrough

Polling rate

Up to 8,000Hz (wired)

Rollover / anti-ghosting

Full-key rollover (NKRO), 100% anti-ghosting

Weight

1.392kg (3.07lb), excl. palm rest

Corsair Galleon 100 SD review: Design

Lush aluminum frame, dense and filled with sound-dampening
Stream Deck replacing the numpad is wildly cool
Twin dials is highly divisive, and the lighting is average

From a pure design perspective, there's a lot here that generally leans positive. The aluminum body is clean, solid, and it feels durable. There's little, if any, flex in the shell, and the sound dampening is doing its work nicely.

There's no errant pings or metallic rattlings going on here at all. Certainly not compared to the 2022 generation of K70 keyboards, that's a fact. And without a doubt, Corsair's keyboard design and build quality has come a long way in the last few years; that's very easy to see. Still, it's not quite as solid as the Makr line, nor does it feel as heavy.

Styling on the whole is a bit of a mixed bag. The aluminum outer shell mimics most of Corsair's product line right now with soft bevelled edges and this relatively satin-esque finish.

(Image credit: Future)

The top LED bar is a bit gauche. You've got this quite bizarre, triangular three-point pattern running along the length of it as a plastic strip with the Corsair logo embedded in the middle, which, if I'm honest, looks quite cheap. It would've been far better suited just to have a singular Corsair logo, and that's it. In fact, that's something that the Makr line does well.

I'm not entirely sold on the twin dial setup either. There's just something about it that looks a bit diabolical, and I can't quite place it. This is a bit of a hangover from the Stream Deck Plus, and I get the utility here being able to configure two dials to two different operations (particularly useful for video scrubbing, or creative work), but visually it's a bit eugh.

(Image credit: Future)

There's also a few other bells and whistles here, too. Namely, for some reason (despite there being a fully dedicated Stream Deck with 12 buttons, media controls, and twin dials over to the right) a fully embedded set of function keys here too. I mean, sure, why not? It's not like you're losing anything by having them.

Keycaps are clean, too. The font face is professional and sensible, more subdued than some of the more custom units out there, and the PBT touch is comfortable enough to type on, that's for sure. Corsair's also included two USB Type-C passthroughs on this thing as well.

Corsair Galleon 100 SD review: Performance

MLX Pulse switches are smooth and satisfying, if over-damped.
Stream Deck's finally usable in-game properly
The three-app software stack drags the whole experience down

So the good news is, typing and gaming on the Galleon 100 is a real treat. It's smooth to use on those linear MLX switches feel buttery under touch. It's not quite as pleasant an experience for me as on the Makr Pro, or Asus ROG Strix Scope II RX, but it's still top quality. If you like a linear switch, and you're not quite as heavy-handed as I am, bottoming out every key strike, you'll love this thing.

The Stream Deck, too, is immensely satisfying to use. Once you've got it set up and it's swapping into profiles on game load, with your keybinds and macros set, it's a real treat. I've already mentioned, but having the keys within reach like that makes it far more useful than leaning across your desk to whack a macro real fast. Star Citizen in particular, and well, any simulator, rife with keybinds, benefits a ton.

I will say, the feel of those switches, though, sucks. Certainly, when you have the direct comparison of a mechanical switch right next to them. That's particularly jarring if you just need to use a numpad quickly to enter a pin, or your phone number. It's mentally very jarring. Almost like you're going back in time for a second, using a membrane board.

(Image credit: Future)

Then there's the software stack. Oh boy. You effectively need two programs to run this board efficiently. The Stream Deck app, to configure your deck profiles and each key, along with the display. That's local, sits on your desktop. Then, the Web Hub to configure the Corsair side of the keyboard. That's web-based (although you can install it on desktop via the "Save and Share -> Install page as an app" feature).

Web Hub is effectively a lighter-weight replacement for iCUE. You access it via URL. Configure your settings once, and it disappears into the ether. The problem with it is that it's not entirely backwards compatible with the rest of Corsair's legacy hardware. So, older products still need to be configured and set up via iCUE on your desktop. What's worse is that the Galleon isn't compatible with iCUE, so if you are embedded in the Corsair ecosystem, you're then left in a position where you have effectively three apps to control your products.

There's a more pressing issue, too, in that Web Hub isn't supported by all browsers currently. In short, it uses two browser APIs to access the keyboard directly via USB: WebHID, and WebUSB. Firefox doesn't natively support those APIs as it (rightly) views it as a harmful fingerprint/security attack vector that exposes your USB hardware unnecessarily to web pages. So it's not even a case of "Mozilla will catch up eventually", the company has taken a philosophical stance against the implementation of it, and it doesn't have anyone working on it.

Similarly, Brave, although Chromium-based, will only allow device configuration through Web Hub with permission enabled, and doesn't allow you to update the firmware at all. If you want to do any of that, you're effectively forced to install Chrome, Edge, or Opera.

It's a tricky one to justify. Particularly as iCUE itself was already stripped down in the last few years anyway. Currently, it only installs modules based on what you actually need and what products you have plugged in, rather than the entire back catalog.

Theoretically, yes, you could install a second browser specifically just for Web Hub. Then install that as a PWA app, but this just feels so hard to justify from a user experience perspective. It'd be far better just to add compatibility into iCUE directly, and it's hard to see why Corsair didn't.

Should I buy the Corsair Galleon 100 SD?Corsair Galleon 100 SD Scorecard

Attribute

Notes

Score

Performance

Switches are a dream to type on, ideal if you don't bottom them out, and having access to that Stream deck gives it greater in-game utility, but the software stack leaves a lot to be desired, particularly if you use Firefox or are security-conscious.

3/5

Design

Clean, crisp, professional with plenty of sound dampening, and quality switches. The implementation of the Stream Deck is top-tier, but the lighting strip could use some work.

4/5

Value

Thoroughly expensive compared to other mechanical boards with similar build quality but you do get a full display and Stream Deck thrown in for good measure.

3/5

Buy it if…

You want a keyboard and a stream deck, but not both
The Galleon 100 SD's claim to fame is that Stream Deck is baked in on the side, replacing the numpad. With twin dials and a cornucopia of profiles you can set up, it becomes one of the best gaming utilities out there.View Deal

You create as much as you game
It's those twin dials that are game-changing, and if you're a streamer, then you're doubly equipped with quick camera options, lighting controls, scene setups, the works, all at your fingertips.View Deal

You miss the older K70 keyboards
There's a certain K70"ness" about the Galleon 100. Naming conventions aside, the size, the layout, the build quality, it's got all the hallmarks of that legendary line.View Deal

Don’t buy it if…

You're fed up with software bloat
Embedded in Corsair's ecosystem already? Be prepared to install Elgato's Stream Deck app, Corsair's Web Hub, and iCUE as well, just to get everything playing nicely, and that's without mentioning the security risk and lack of Firefox support.View Deal

You're after a budget keyboard
She's seriously pricey, and you can get similarly performing keyboards at a fraction of the cost, with sound-dampening and pre-lubed linear switches if you'd like. Although you lose out on that Stream Deck.View Deal

You want a slimmer form factor
Its extended form factor makes it wide, seriously wide, which can be an issue if you're thinking about your ergonomics or have a narrow desk.View Deal

Also consider

Corsair Makr Pro 75

Want the premium Corsair build without the Stream Deck sprawl, and $100 off? The Makr Pro 75 is the better-built, hall-effect sibling, with adjustable magnetic switches and eight layers of dampening to the Galleon's 6. Sure, you lose out on the big ol display and squishy media keys, but it dominates this thing in almost every other area, with 33% off.View Deal

Asus ROG Strix Scope II RX

You don't have to break the bank to get a good ol' lubed-up keyboard these days. Asus' Strix Scope II RX is a seriously slick alternative: superb RX Red optical switches, proper sound dampening, PBT keycaps, and an actual numpad, all for about $110, roughly a third of the price. The catch? No Stream Deck to spam your buddies with gifs. Still, you could buy this and a standard one, and still save $100.

Read our full Asus ROG Strix Scope II RX reviewView Deal

How I tested the Corsair Galleon 100 SD

Tested over three weeks as my daily driver
Used for gaming, professional writing, and creative work
Full Stream Deck integration tested
Compared to competitors and my back catalogue, with 11 years of experience in the tech field

I lived with the Galleon 100 SD for about three weeks, running it as my main board. I tested it across all manner of different tasks, from creative agency work to freelance journalism and, of course, gaming sessions in Total War: Warhammer 3 and World of Warcraft as well.

During my time with it, it was the Stream Deck that I focused on most; after all, keyboards are very similar, and Corsair's got a name for making good ones, but implementing a Stream Deck into the side of it and swapping out the numpad? Had to be put through its paces.

I benchmarked it against a selection of modern-day keyboards I have in-house, and compared it to the wider market at the time of testing, including the Makr Pro 75, which I'd just finished up reviewing as well. I've spent over a decade testing PC hardware and peripherals, so I've got plenty of knowledge to draw on when it comes to mechanical keebs and the plucky old Stream Deck, too.

Read TechRadar’s reviews guarantee
First reviewed: June 2026

Categories: Reviews

RugOne Xever 8 review: An extremely rugged phone with a replaceable battery, but it's not quite the next-generation device I hoped for

Thu, 06/11/2026 - 06:40

RugOne Xever 8: 30-second review

While this phone won’t make our best rugged phone collection, what it offers might be perfect for some customers, and it is reasonably affordable for a phone with a swappable battery.

RugOne is Ulefone's premium rugged sub-brand, launched in late 2025. It targets buyers who want a genuinely capable device rather than a cheap, rough-and-ready handset. The Xever 8 is the entry point to the second generation of that vision. It arrived in May 2026 and carries forward the headline idea from the Xever 7 series: a battery you can swap without powering down the phone.

That concept matures here into what RugOne calls Swappable Battery 2.0. The claim is that critical apps stay running throughout the swap, and within quite narrow criteria, it achieves that.

I can confirm that the Xever 8 ships with two 4,800mAh batteries and a charging dock in the box. For field workers and outdoor users who simply cannot afford downtime, the proposition is clear.

There is a catch, though, and it is worth addressing upfront. The Xever 7 was a 5G device with a Dimensity 8020 chipset. The Xever 8 steps down to a Helio G200 on a 4G-only platform. For a phone launching in 2026, that is a significant concession, and it, to some degree, negates some of the advantages this phone has over its previous generation. RugOne made a deliberate trade-off, prioritising the battery system and audio hardware over performance. Whether buyers agree that trade is fair depends heavily on what they need most.

With a better SoC, this might have been one of the best rugged phones, but it appears that we might need to wait until the Xever 9 to get all these ducks in a row.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)RugOne Xever 8: price and availability

How much does it cost? $368/£380
When is it out? Available now
Where can you get it? You can get it directly from RugOne or via many online retailers such as AliExpress.

The RugOne Xever 8 comes in two colors, Back and Sand Dune, and each of these offers two SKUs, one with 128GB of storage and another with 256GB.

While the machine is shown on the RugOne website, there isn’t any option to buy it from the maker, and I was forced to search for it elsewhere. The only place I could find it was AliExpress, and for US customers, the only option is the 128GB model for $367.99.

UK customers get both capacity phones, with the 128GB being £379.39 and the 256GB option (reviewed here) being £414.59. Spending £35.20 and getting an extra 128GB of storage doesn’t seem like a poor deal. It doesn’t appear to be available to those in the EU at this time, but I suspect it will be at some point.

I complained that the previous RugOne Xever 7 Pro was too expensive, and admittedly, its predecessor, the Xever 8, is cheaper. However, given its specifications, it should be less.

The obvious competitor for this phone is the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro, a phone that sells for roughly $560 in the USA, and £425 in the UK. That’s for a phone with only 128GB of storage and a single battery. Batteries are freely available for around £22 each. The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro uses a Snapdragon 7 Gen3 SoC, making it a substantially more powerful device, justifying some of that extra cost.

The Xever 8 is a better value than its Xever 7 Pro predecessor, but it's hardly a bargain in the remarkably competitive rugged phone sector. What helps RugOne justify the price somewhat is the relatively small number of designs with replaceable batteries.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

Value score: 4/5

RugOne Xever 8: Specs

Item

Spec

CPU:

MediaTek Helio G200 (6nm)

GPU:

Mali-G57 MC2

NPU:

N/A

RAM:

8GB

Storage:

256GB UFS 2.2

Screen:

6.5-inch IPS Screen

Resolution:

1080 x 2400 FHD+, 120Hz, 680 nits

SIM:

2x Nano SIM + TF + eSIM (all can be used)

Weight:

320 grams

Dimensions:

168 x 80 x 14mm

Rugged Spec:

IP68 IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 2m for 30 minutes), MIL-STD-810H Certification

Rear cameras:

64MP Main Camera + 20 MP Night Vision Camera

Front camera:

32MP

Networking:

4G LTE. WiFi 5, Bluetooth 5.2

Audio:

3.5mm audio jack for headphones

OS:

Android 15 (updates promised)

Battery:

4600 mAh (Max 33W wired, dock included) hot-swapable

Colours:

Sand Dune, Black

RugOne Xever 8: Design

Industrial aesthetic
Extra custom buttons
Easily swappable batteries

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

In many ways, this phone is a derivative of the Xever 7 Pro, but with some extra elegance and refinement in places. That it comes with the charging stand, a second battery, a charger, and a bunch of other accessories does make it feel more worthy of the asking price.

The Xever 8 measures 168 x 80 x 14mm and weighs 320g. It is not especially light or slim, but it fits better into a pocket than some rugged phones I’ve reviewed. That is the reality of a phone engineered to survive two-metre drops, high-pressure water jets, and the demands of MIL-STD-810H testing. The IP69K rating alongside IP68 is notable. IP69K specifically covers resistance to high-temperature, high-pressure water streams, which is relevant in agricultural and industrial settings where a regular waterproof phone would fail.

RugOne has tried to soften the bulk with bevelled edges designed for grip. The company calls the speaker and camera module arrangement symmetrical, which is unusual in this category. Two colourways are available: Black and Sand Dune. The latter is a muted, low-saturation tone clearly inspired by the rugged outdoor aesthetic that is now common across the category.

The rear cover is removable, obviously, since the battery sits beneath it. The dual-latch system on that cover is a practical addition. An internal latch secures the battery cell itself, and the outer cover adds a second retention point. The claim is that this significantly improves drop resistance at the point where a single-latch design would typically allow the battery to shift on impact.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

A dedicated button on the side can be used to activate the TorchX flashlight, rated at 230 lumens. That is a useful addition for anyone working in unlit environments. The 3.5mm headphone jack is also present on the top edge. These are small decisions that matter to the people this phone is built for.

The Xever 8 uses a 6.5-inch IPS LCD panel running at 1080 x 2400 pixels. At 405 pixels per inch, sharpness is not an issue. The 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling and navigation feel fluid. Peak brightness reaches 680 nits in high brightness mode, which should be adequate for outdoor use in most conditions, though it does not match the 1,000-plus nit figures now appearing on flagship OLED panels.

Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protects the display. That is two generations behind Gorilla Glass 5 and four behind Gorilla Glass Victus, both of which appear on competing devices in this price range. It is functional protection, and the overall rugged construction means the chassis absorbs much of the shock that would otherwise reach the screen, but it is worth noting for buyers who have had cracked screens before.

The aspect ratio is 20:9, which suits one-handed use in portrait mode. RugOne says the display is grip-friendly, and the physical dimensions suggest the narrower 80mm width helps with that. All the buttons are metal, which does give the Xever 8 a premium feel.

Design score: 4/5

RugOne Xever 8: Hardware

MediaTek Helio G200
UFS 2.2 storage
Swappable batteries

The MediaTek Helio G200 is a 6nm octa-core chip running two Cortex-A76 performance cores at 2.2GHz alongside six Cortex-A55 efficiency cores at 2.0GHz. The GPU is a Mali-G57 MC2.

If you didn’t read the clues in those statements, this is a mid-range platform, not a flagship one. For everyday use, including calls, navigation, messaging, and camera work, it will perform without complaint. Gaming above casual titles and GPU-intensive tasks is where this chip reaches its ceiling.

The RAM configuration is 8GB physical with an additional 8GB of virtual dynamic RAM. Storage ships in 128GB and 256GB variants, both using UFS 2.2. That is an area where the Xever 7 series outshone this device. UFS 2.2 is not slow, but the step from higher-grade storage feels like a backwards move in a product that otherwise claims to be purpose-built for professional use.

USB connectivity is USB 2.0. There is no video output. For a field worker wanting to mirror the screen to a display or transfer large files quickly, that is a real limitation. The Xever 7 Pro carried the same USB 2.0 restriction and received criticism for it. The Xever 8 repeats that choice, though that’s another feature that hinges on the choice of the SoC.

Where the Xever 8 makes its strongest argument is in the battery department, because in theory, it could have a massive capacity. Each battery holds 4,800mAh. Two are included.

The Swappable Battery 2.0 system allows one to be replaced while the phone keeps running. A small internal power buffer maintains the system during the swap. RugOne states that critical apps, calls, and GPS remain active throughout, provided the swap is completed within two minutes. Beyond two minutes, the phone enters a 60-second safety lockout to protect data.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

In practice, that means a user carrying one spare battery has access to something approaching 9,600mAh of usable capacity across a working day without needing a cable at all. The four-in-one charging station that comes in the box charges batteries independently, so the spare can top up while the device is in use.

However, where this scheme trips up somewhat is with respect to charging, which peaks at 18W wired. That is not fast by 2026 standards, but the swappable system largely renders charging speed less critical than it is on sealed-battery devices. The phone also supports 10W reverse wired charging, allowing it to top up other devices.

One concern raised in early community commentary is that RugOne's customer support has indicated that additional batteries are not sold separately. Buyers receive what comes in the box and cannot stock spare cells beyond that. This is a significant limitation if a battery degrades over time, or you wish to carry more than one replacement.

For this reviewer, the biggest issue here is the G200 CPU, as it's far from modern phone technology, and it doesn’t support 5G comms, only 4G LTE. This choice seems to fly in the face of the notion that newer designs should have better technology.

As a platform, the Xever 8 is underwhelming.

Hardware score: 3/5

RugOne Xever 8: Cameras

64MP, 20MP on the rear
32MP on the front
Three cameras in total

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

The RugOne Xever 8 has three cameras:

Rear camera: 64MP Sony IMX682, 20MP Sony IMX350 Night vision,
Front camera: 32MP GalaxyCore GC32E1

The main sensor is a 64MP Sony IMX682 with an f/1.9 aperture and PDAF. This is a well-regarded 1/1.7-inch sensor that appears across a range of mid-to-high-end devices. Paired with sufficient processing and a capable aperture, it can produce usable results in daylight. Video tops out at 2K at 30fps, which is adequate but hardly wonderful.

The second rear camera is the more interesting choice for this category. It is a 20MP night vision camera with an f/1.8 aperture and two integrated infrared emitters. In total darkness, without any visible light, this sensor can produce usable images and video.

The applications this is suitable for are straightforward: wildlife observation, search and rescue, perimeter checks, and pinhole camera detection. It is a genuinely specialist capability that most smartphones simply do not offer.

Oddly, in the supported camera section of Android, it mentions that this version of the OS was compiled with support for the GalaxyCore GC8034, an 8MP sensor often used for special focus scenarios like Bokeh mode. But I couldn’t find any evidence for this hardware in the camera app, so it might have been omitted from the final phone.

On the front, a 32MP f/2.5 selfie camera covers video calls and self-documentation. The 0.7-micron pixel size is small, which may limit low-light performance, but the resolution is generous for the category.

An underwater camera mode is included, accessible via side buttons to avoid touchscreen failures when submerged. Given the realistic limits on how deep you can submerge a phone like this, I’m not sure providing an underwater mode is a good idea. Take it much beyond the two-metre depth limit, and pressure will force water inside, ending the fun abruptly.

For still image capture, the primary camera on the Xever 8 is effective, and the night vision sensor is a tried-and-tested solution. There are also plenty of special modes such as slow motion, time lapse, panorama, document capture, group photo, dual video, sports and Pro controls.

What’s less wonderful is that there are only two levels of digital zoom, and the maximum video resolution is only 2K. Note that the Sony IMX682 supports 4K capture, whereas the G200 SoC can only handle 2K video. Yet another way that the SoC choice stymied this design.

RugOne Xever 8 Camera samplesMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark Pickavance

Camera score: 3.5/5

RugOne Xever 8: Performance

6nm SoC
Mid-tier performance

Phone

RugOne Xever 8

RugOne Xever 7 Pro

SoC

MediaTek Helio G200

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

GPU

Mali-G57 MC2

IMG BXM-8-256

NPU

N/A

Memory

8GB/256GB

12GB/512GB

Weight

320g

325g

Battery

4800

5550

Geekbench

Single

728

940

Multi

1952

2283

OpenCL

1657

136*

Vulkan

1747

133*

PCMark

3.0 Score

9357

11353

Battery

15h 18m (15%)

17h 53m

Charge 30

Passmark

Score

5914

10999

CPU

4616

5367

3DMark

Slingshot OGL

3346

3777

Slingshot Ex. OGL

2531

2600

Slingshot Ex. Vulkan

2746

2665

Wildlife

1427

N/A

Nomad Lite

162

N/A

If the Xever 7 Pro were made by a different brand, then perhaps comparing it to the Xever 8 might be considered unfair, but it's mostly the numbering convention here that sends a confused signal.

From a hardware perspective, the Xever 8 is a retrograde step, with the exception of graphics. The IMG BXM-8-256 used on the Xever 7 Pro is a horrific GPU that doesn’t support OpenGL or Vulkan properly, and it gets outperformed by the modest Mali-G57 MC2. To anchor that assessment, the Xever 8 still isn’t a gaming phone, or anything approaching that.

Where these scores get interesting is when we look at the battery, because the Xever 8 has a smaller battery than the Xever 7 Pro, but manages similar efficiency. As I recall, on the Xever 7 Pro, the phone was entirely exhausted after the battery benchmark, but the Xever 8 still had 15% battery left. If you at 15% to the running time of the Xever 8, it’s almost exactly the same time as the Xever 7 Pro.

Except, it has 14% less battery capacity. That demonstrates that the Helio G200 is more efficient than the Dimensity 7025. But compared to a modern 4nm SoC, it's not that efficient.

Overall, neither of these devices is anything more than a mid-tier device, and by the end of this year, they’ll be entry-level. But if you do invest in the Xever 8, it’s nice to know you have more than 30 hours of runtime with both batteries.

Performance score: 3/5

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)RugOne Xever 8: Final verdict

Before I wrote this review, I immediately looked at my RugOne Xever 7 Pro piece, and was amused by the first paragraph in that verdict. I’d said the Xever 7 Pro design had gone somewhat off the rails when they discovered that the 5550mAh battery in that phone wasn’t enough for the SoC that RugOne had probably planned for it. It was a guess on my part that the Dimensity 7025 used in that design was an alternative that better fitted the battery capacity.

And, now in the Xever 8, I’m getting the same vibe. Instead of starting with the SoC and then designing the battery system to work with that, it looks like RugOne started with the battery and worked backwards. Which is how this machine ended up with the G200 SoC.

For those familiar with MediaTek’s range, the G200 only appeared in mid-2025, although its technology dates back to the G100 (2024) and the G99 (2022). And, the giveaway about the underlying age of this design is that it's fabricated at 6nm, not the 4nm that MediaTek sells for mid-tier designs, or the 3nm (soon to be 2nm) on its flagship chips. The G99 wasn’t entirely new when it was launched, and the G200 is three iterations from that.

The irony is that a newer SoC might have allowed the battery in the Xever 8 to last even longer if used correctly, and enabled more concurrent features like 5G comms and 4K video.

Overall, for someone who can work with these specifications, the Xever 8 is a workable solution, but, like the Xever 7 Pro, it's compromised in several important areas.

Should I buy a RugOne Xever 8?RugOne Xever 8 Score Card

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

Better value than the Xever 7 Pro, but it needed a better SoC for this price

4/5

Design

Easy to handle and includes an elegant battery tech

4/5

Hardware

The G200 SoC isn’t modern tech and lacks 5G

3/5

Camera

Good primary camera sensor and night vision, but only 2K video

3.5/5

Performance

Not a great performer for its price

3/5

Overall

Swappable batteries don’t overshadow some of this phone limitations

3.5/5

Buy it if...

You need a phone for outdoors
The water and dust resistance on the Xever 8 is enough to handle submersion and drops. And the battery-swap technology also helps avoid it being overly heavy.

You need battery capacity
One critical feature of this design is the swappable battery, and how that feature translates into running time. However, RugOne doesn’t appear to sell extra batteries yet, which is crazy.

Don't buy it if...

You need the best photography
The sensors on this phone aren't exceptional, but they're also not rubbish. However, the camera app doesn't allow you to exploit what the sensors can do, and video capture is capped at only 2K resolution.

You need 5G
The SoC in the Xever 8 only supports 4G comms, so this isn’t the phone for those who live and work in an area supported by 5G.

Also Consider

Blackview Oscal Tank 1
An inexpensive phone with a 20000 mAh. But in this case, it comes with a superior SoC platform and a better camera cluster. Therefore, you get 4K video recording on both rear and front sensors, and you also get an SoC that supports 5G comms.

Read my full Blackview Oscal Tank 1 reviewView Deal

RugOne Xever 7 Pro
A previous RugOne design has similar swappable battery technology, but slightly larger batteries. The one critical advantage of this design is its thermal imaging camera. However, it costs more than the Xever 8, because of that feature.

Read my RugOne Xever 7 Pro review

For more ruggedized devices, we've reviewed the best rugged tablets, the best rugged laptops, and the best rugged hard drives

Categories: Reviews

‘The mechanical switches and hardware customizations are top-tier’: this HyperX gaming keyboard is one of the best I’ve tested — but certain gamers will be disappointed

Wed, 06/10/2026 - 09:04

HyperX Origins 2 1800: One-minute review

The HyperX Origins 2 1800 is a full-size gaming keyboard with mechanical switches and plenty of hardware customizations available.

It adopts a fairly typical gaming keyboard aesthetic, although the translucent body does at least offer something a little different. This also allows the RGB lighting to shine through a little more than usual. And shine it does — this is probably the brightest RGB I’ve ever seen in a keyboard, and it helps the board to stand out among its peers.

Build quality is above average, with materials feeling smooth. However, unlike the best gaming keyboard constructions around, the body is made of plastic rather than aluminum. There’s also a fair amount of flex to it.

On the other hand, it’s very light as a result, despite its thickness. It’s also easy to replace the body if you want to personalize your Origins 2, thanks to the easy-access screws underneath.

(Image credit: Future)

A board this thick often poses an ergonomic problem, but given the generous tilt angle of the Origins 2, I found it comfortable to use, even with the feet stowed and the lack of wrist support. The dip in the middle row allowed for natural finger positioning, too.

There is software available for the Origins 2, although it’s disappointingly basic. It does have a generous selection of remapping options, but there are no advanced or pro-level tweaks available here.

Elite gamers will be more impressed with the performance of the Origins 2, though. The stock Linear switches are very snappy and responsive, with just enough dampening and travel to impart satisfying feedback.

The stock keycaps are also comfortable, with their prominent indents providing a secure WASD position. The space bar is also pleasing to hit, thanks to its slightly rounded top, and the aforementioned tilt of the entire board prevents you from hitting its edge. However, the sheer height of the keycaps can make typing difficult.

There’s no denying that the Origins 2 commands a premium price tag, but it is a premium gaming keyboard. The mechanical switches and hardware customizations are top-tier, and it still costs less than some of its rivals. The software is disappointing and typing is difficult with those stock keycaps, but for those who want a pure mechanical experience, the Origins 2 is hard to beat at this price.

HyperX Origins 2 1800 review: Price and availability

(Image credit: Future)

$139.99 / £119.99 (about AU$200)
Available now in one colorway
Reasonable price for a mechanical keyboard

The HyperX Origins 2 1800 costs $139.99 / £119.99 (about AU$200) and is available now in black only. The keycaps, switches, and body can all be swapped out.

This is certainly an expensive board, especially one that’s wired. However, given the high-performing mechanical switches, build quality, and hot swapping capabilities, it’s not exactly surprising.

What’s more, other high-end boards are similarly expensive, if not more so. The Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro, for instance, has a slightly higher list price, although we have seen it on offer for considerably less than this. When I tested the wireless variant of this board, the Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro 75%, I found it to be among the best mechanical keyboards in terms of feel, performance, and build quality.

For a more budget mechanical option, you could try the Gamakay TK75 V2. This is considerably cheaper than the Origins 2, yet it still offers great key feel and respectable build quality.

Value score: 4 / 5

HyperX Origins 2 1800 review: Specs

Layout

Full-size

Switch

Mechanical

Programmable keys

Yes

Dimensions

15.3 x 5.5 x 1.8 inch / 388 x 140 x 46mm

RGB or backlighting

Yes (customizable)

HyperX Origins 2 1800 review: Design and features

(Image credit: Future)

Hardware personalization options
Thick but lightweight
Premium feel as plastic constructions go

Aesthetically, the Origins 2 is hard to distinguish from many gaming keyboards. HyperX may call the color black but in reality it’s more of a dark grey, which departs somewhat from the sector’s obsidian dominance, albeit not by much.

Its translucent nature, though, is more original. What’s more, it allows the RGB backlighting to shine through. This lighting is brighter than many other instances I’ve seen, and really helps to liven up appearances. The keycap characters are fully transparent too, meaning these illuminate as well, which isn’t always a given on RGB keyboards.

The Origins 2 feels like a premium board. The base material, despite being plastic rather than metal, is of a high standard and the two panels are solidly put together. The unit is quite easy to flex by hand, but not to a concerning degree. This plastic also means the Origins 2 isn’t as heavy as it looks, given how thick it is. It’s also relatively easy to change the housing, requiring just a small crosshead screwdriver (not included) to disassemble and swap with another.

(Image credit: Future)

Its thickness isn’t much of a problem from an ergonomic perspective. There’s no wrist support included, but the forward tilt of the board makes for a comfortable hand position. The dip in the middle row, typical of many keyboards, also helps in this regard. There are folding feet that angle the board towards the user even more, but the difference isn’t as great as other examples.

The USB-C cable that comes with the Origins 2 is braided and quite light. This makes it easy to maneuver, although it’s not quite as light as those that come with the best gaming mice. Thankfully, drag isn’t exactly an issue when it comes to keyboards. Also, the cable seems a little stiffer and hardwearing than mice ones.

The latest version of HyperX’s Ngenuity software is required to customize the Origins 2. However, I couldn’t get this to work on my main gaming PC for some reason, with the app refusing to open once installed. Fortunately, I was able to install it on another Windows 11 machine.

However, the dearth of features available for the Origins 2 is disappointing. You can only adjust the RGB lighting, record macros, and rebind keys. There are plenty of options for the latter, with numerous system and media functions mappable, but there are no performance-related tweaks. Granted, a mechanical keyboard is never going to match the versatility of analog models on this front, but even more basic features, such as an SOCD function, are missing here, which might disappoint elite gamers.

Design and features score: 3.5 / 5

HyperX Origins 2 1800 review: Performance

(Image credit: Future)

Brilliant clicky mechanical switches
Comfortable for WASD position
Stock keycaps not great for typing

With its stock red Linear switches installed, the Origins 2 is a very clicky board. It produces a gratifying sound, although it’s a little louder than others. The keys are light but at the same time offer plenty of feedback, thanks to their minimal but effective dampening and generous travel distance. They rebound quickly, making them wonderfully snappy, and their actuation point is quite forgiving, which meant I didn’t suffer any mispresses.

Despite the thickness of the board, I found it comfortable to use in the WASD position, thanks to that slanted angle and central dip. Whether I had the feet up or down, I didn’t find myself wanting for wrist support, although I usually prefer a rest for long sessions.

I also found the space bar comfortable to hit, which is often a problem key for me. Its soft curve meant I rarely hit its edge. As for the other keycaps, their prominent indentations offered secure presses.

These aspects also make the Origins 2 comfortable when typing, but a bigger impediment here is the sheer height of the stock keycaps. I usually prefer low profiles as I find I can glide over them more easily. But here, I often caught their edges as I moved from key to key, which slowed me down and resulted in more errors.

Performance score: 4 / 5

Should I buy the HyperX Origins 2 1800?Scorecard

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

It’s expensive, but reasonably priced compared to the competition.

4 / 5

Design and features

Thick but light and comfortable. There are plenty of hardware customizations, but not so many software ones.

3.5 / 5

Performance

Fantastically clicky and snappy switches. Great for gaming, less so for typing.

4 / 5

Overall rating

The Origins 2 is a great mechanical keyboard, slightly let down by the lack of performance tweaks.

4 / 5

Buy it if…

You love a clicky board
The clickiness of the stock Linear switches feels and sounds great, although they are a little loud.

You want plenty of hardware customizations
You can swap out the switches, keycaps, and even the body, letting you personalize your Origins 2 to a large extent.

Don't buy it if…

You want plenty of software customizations
There are plenty of remapping options, but those looking for performance-related adjustments will be disappointed.

You’ll be typing a lot
While the indentations of the stock keycaps provide comfort and security, their height doesn’t exactly facilitate fast and smooth typing.

HyperX Origins 2 1800 review: Also consider

Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro
Another premium mechanical board, the BlackWidow is a fantastic performer, and unlike the Origins 2, it comes with a wrist rest — and it’s one of the plushest I’ve ever used. Upon its release, it was substantially more expensive than the Origins 2, but recently it’s had considerable discounts. Read our full Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro review.

Gamakay TK75 V2
If you want something cheaper than the Origins 2, but still want all that mechanical goodness, the TK75 V2 is a good choice. Not only does it perform very well, but it’s also built to a surprisingly high standard. Read our full Gamakay TK75 V2 review.

How I tested the HyperX Origins 2 1800

(Image credit: Future)

I tested the Origins 2 for several days, during which time I used it for gaming, working, and general browsing. I tested it on two PCs. As mentioned above, I was unable to get the Ngenuity software working on my main PC, but did on another, despite both running Windows 11 with x64 CPUs.

I’ve been PC gaming for over a decade, and have used numerous keyboards in that time. I’ve also reviewed a large number of them, across a range of price points, feature sets, and switch types.

Read TechRadar’s reviews guarantee
First reviewed: June 2026

Categories: Reviews

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 review: same bones, sharper bite

Wed, 06/10/2026 - 05:55

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2: Two-minute review

The SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 doesn’t try to do everything. Instead, it focuses primarily on one: speed.

At 68g, it’s built to be as light and responsive as possible, targeting players who want quick reactions and minimal resistance. That approach works: it’s fast, accurate, and easy to control, particularly in competitive games where small movements make a difference.

But that focus comes with trade-offs. The honeycomb shell won’t suit everyone, and the feature set is deliberately minimal. If you’re looking for extras, you’ll likely find more elsewhere. Likewise, the smaller ambidextrous shape won’t be the best fit for all hand sizes, and the Aerox 3’s mechanical switches won’t satisfy everyone, particularly when some mid-range rivals offer optical or hybrid switches.

(Image credit: Future)

Nevertheless, the Gen 2 does bring some meaningful quality-of-life improvements over its predecessor. It features an up-rated 26K TrueMove sensor and boasts a 4000Hz wireless polling rate without the need for a dongle upgrade. Both represent clear upgrades in terms of gaming performance, shifting the emphasis towards fast-paced and competitive gameplay.

Battery life is similarly impressive, offering up to 120 hours on 2.4GHz, or up to 200 hours on Bluetooth. That said, this assumes 1000Hz with RGB off for both, so if you’re planning on gaming at the top end with all the bells and whistles at your disposal, expect there to be some drop-off in longevity here.

Another notable differentiator is the GG software’s 3D Aim Trainer and sensitivity converter, which can be tweaked and personalised to train your flicks, tracking, and target switching across multiple gaming environments, helping you to find the right settings before stepping into a live match.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 review: Design

The Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 light weight is immediately noticeable. In boxing terms, this guy is a minimumweight, clocking in at just 68g (the same as the Gen 1 model). It’s easy to move quickly and with minimal effort, it’s perfect for fast-paced gameplay.

Its low weight comes from the honeycomb chassis, which removes material to keep things light. It works well, but the perforated design may divide opinion: some will appreciate the lighter feel and added airflow, while others may find it less comfortable during longer sessions. The design feels almost skeletal, and while I didn’t find it uncomfortable per se, I remained aware of those perforations throughout testing.

Aside from its scrawny appearance then, the Aerox 3’s build quality is solid, with minimal flex during normal use. It’s zippy and responsive, with the welcome retention of the Gen 1’s IP54-rated AquaBarrier protection to help guard against dust and (coffee) splashes – which isn’t always a given in this mid-range category.

(Image credit: Future)

The shape is ambidextrous and broadly accessible, although it’s best suited to claw or fingertip grips. For me, an average-sized, middle-aged ape, it felt a little small. I tend to prefer a steeper curve at the back end of a mouse; the Aerox 3’s relatively flat profile doesn’t quite accommodate a comfortable grip, with too much palm left over with nowhere to sit.

Buttons are well placed, with five programmable inputs covering the basics, and the scroll wheel offers a consistent, controlled action.

The Aerox 3 Gen 2 features three-zone RGB lighting that provides a cool, neon underglow, and it can be customized via the GG app to suit your personal preferences and to complement your gaming setup. RGB lighting is subtle rather than showy, adding a bit of visual flair without becoming a distraction, switching itself off during mouse movement to conserve battery life.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 review: Performance

Pull the Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 out of the box, and the first thing you’ll notice is how little there is of it. At 68g, it almost doesn’t register in your hand, and that weightlessness translates directly into how it performs. This is a mouse that gets out of its own way.

The TrueMove 26K sensor is the engine under the hood, and it’s a willing one. Tracking was consistent across every surface I tested it on, including my SteelSeries Limited Edition QCK cloth gaming mousepad, my partner’s Corsair MM700 RGB Extended gaming mousepad, and bare-desk testing, with no drift or jitter across a range of DPI settings. The addition of adjustable lift-off distance over the Gen 1 is a small but welcome refinement, and was certainly noticeable with the amount of junk I have on my desk.

DPI flexibility is one of the Aerox 3 Gen 2’s quiet strengths. Spending time with Cyberpunk 2077, I found myself toggling between settings depending on the situation. I opted for high DPI (around 15,000+) when surrounded by enemies (which happens far too often), then dropped to between 500 and 800 DPI for precision aiming. The onboard DPI button makes switching on-the-fly straightforward, and I found myself efficiently eliminating such foes as John Wick on a rampage.

(Image credit: Future)

However, where the Aerox 3 Gen 2 really earns its stripes is in competitive gaming. Testing it in Apex Legends, the 4000Hz polling rate — which needs to be enabled in the GG app — delivered noticeably smoother cursor movement, low input lag, and killshots I’d have otherwise missed. At this price point, 4000Hz wireless polling without the need for a dongle upgrade is a big achievement and genuinely made a difference to my gameplay.

Running the mouse through mousetester.io at 3250 DPI with polling set to 4000Hz, I recorded a real-world polling rate of 3106Hz, which is a strong result and well within the expected range for a mouse of this specification. Pushing the DPI higher caused that figure to dip slightly — which is consistent with how high-polling-rate sensors behave under increased processing load, rather than any inherent limitation of the hardware. In practice, most competitive players will be running DPI settings where the Aerox 3 Gen 2 performs at its best anyway.

The mechanical switches deserve a mention, too. Rated for 80 million actuations, they’re crisp, light, and tactile. They might look plasticky, but they don’t feel cheap, which further affirms the price range. The PTFE feet glide smoothly across my mousepad, and the overall movement experience is effortless.

At $99.99 / £99.99, you’re not getting the last word in gaming mouse performance; the Razer DeathAdder V4 Pro’s 45K DPI sensor and 8000Hz polling rate still sit in a different league. But that’s not what the Aerox 3 Gen 2 is trying to be. What it delivers at this price is a fast, consistent, genuinely competitive wireless experience, and it does so very well.

The Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 supports both 2.4GHz wireless and Bluetooth. The inclusion of both at this price is worth noting, particularly as some of the Aerox 3’s rivals have opted to drop Bluetooth entirely in pursuit of raw performance (e.g., the Razer DeathAdder V4 Pro and Logitech’s G Pro X2 Superstrike).

For gaming, 2.4GHz is the clear choice, offering lower latency and a more stable connection. Bluetooth is better suited to everyday tasks, multi-device setups, or commuting. What’s more, commuters can leave the dongle at home and still pair this mouse without it, boosting its portability factor.

Battery life is a genuine strength. SteelSeries rates the Aerox 3 Gen 2 at up to 200 hours on Bluetooth and up to 120 hours on 2.4GHz, both assuming 1000Hz polling with RGB off. Push that polling rate up to 4000Hz, however, and that figure is likely to drop sharply, to around 30 hours or so. That will still give you enough juice for the bulk of a working week, but it’s a notable trade-off if you’re planning on leaving that cable behind permanently.

(Image credit: Future)

One practical point: there’s no onboard storage for the USB dongle inside the mouse itself (no surprise there, given its aerated design). However, SteelSeries has included a desk-based extension cable for situations where signal strength may be an issue, which is a handy addition if your tower sits on the floor.

Charging is handled via USB-C with fast-charging support, which helps keep downtime to a minimum when you do eventually need to plug in.

Customization is handled through the SteelSeries GG app, which strikes a good balance between accessibility and depth.

You’ll find all the basics catered for here: you can adjust DPI across multiple levels; remap your buttons; fine-tune RGB lighting; and save profiles for different setups. Plus, its onboard memory means your key settings travel with the mouse rather than being tethered to a single machine, which is a godsend for anybody switching between computers.

(Image credit: SteelSeries)

One important practical note: the headline-grabbing 4000Hz polling rate isn’t enabled by default, and you’ll need to head to the GG app to unlock it. This is simple enough to enable, but worth knowing before you assume you’re getting that peak performance right off the bat.

Where the GG software genuinely stands out, however, is the 3D Aim Trainer and Sensitivity Finder. This is best described as a 10-minute mini-game that analyses your playstyle and recommends an optimal DPI setting for your chosen FPS. It even lets you apply that sensitivity across different games, so if you split your time between titles, you can maintain a consistent feel from one to the next. Considering the Aerox 3’s price point, this is a thoughtful and genuinely useful addition that goes beyond what most rival software suites offer.

The interface itself is clean and easy to navigate, and I didn’t encounter any bugs or technical issues during my time with it.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 review: Price & availability

$99.99 / £99.99
Available now in Shadow, Magenta Haze, and Ghost colorways

The SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 typically retails for around £99.99 / $99.99, although it’s frequently available at a discount, making it an even more attractive proposition at this mid-range price point.

It comes in three colorways: Shadow (black), Magenta Haze (pink), and a semi-translucent Ghost finish, the latter of which leans into the current trend for see-through tech aesthetics and looks particularly striking with RGB lighting active. I was provided with the Ghost variant for this review, and I can absolutely vouch for the cool factor that it lends to my gaming setup.

At this price, the Aerox 3 sits comfortably alongside rivals such as the Endgame Gear OP1w 4K and Be Quiet! Dark Perk Ergo, while undercutting more premium competition such as the Razer DeathAdder V4 Pro and the Logitech G Pro X2 Superstrike by a considerable margin. For the performance on offer, it represents solid value for money.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 review: Specs

Buttons

Sensor

SteelSeries TrueMove 26K

Max DPI

26,000

Should I buy the SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2?

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 scorecard

Attribute

Notes

Score

Features

A solid but minimal physical package, five buttons, and mechanical switches are functional rather than exciting, and some rivals offer more at this price point. The GG software’s 3D Aim Trainer partially redresses the balance.

3.5 / 5

Performance

The TrueMove 26K sensor is accurate and consistent across surfaces, and the 4000Hz polling rate made a genuine difference in competitive gameplay. The mechanical switches are crisp and functional, if not quite at the level of optical alternatives.

4.5 / 5

Design

The honeycomb chassis keeps the weight impressively low at 68g, and the build quality is solid throughout. The smaller ambidextrous shape and flat profile won’t suit all hand sizes or grip styles, though.

4 / 5

Value

At £99.99, the Aerox 3 Gen 2 offers strong performance for the price, 4000Hz wireless polling, and dual connectivity, including Bluetooth, which are features you’d typically pay considerably more for.

4 / 5

Buy it if…

You want a lightweight wireless mouse built for speed
At just 68g, the Aerox 3 Gen 2 is built to get out of your way and let you focus on what matters. At this price point, few rivals come close to matching its combination of weight, sensor performance, and 4000Hz wireless polling.View Deal

You mainly play fast-paced competitive games
The upgraded TrueMove 26K sensor and 4000Hz polling rate make this a genuinely capable competitive mouse, delivering the low latency and responsive tracking that fast-paced shooters demand.View Deal

You value strong battery life and flexible connectivity
With up to 200 hours on Bluetooth and 120 hours on 2.4GHz, the Aerox 3 Gen 2 keeps going long after rivals need a charge. The inclusion of both wireless modes adds versatility that some pricier mice don’t bother with.View Deal

Don’t buy it if…

You prefer a solid-shell design
The honeycomb chassis is central to keeping the weight down, but if you find perforated designs uncomfortable — or simply don’t like the look — then there are cleaner alternatives available at a similar price.View Deal

You prefer a heavier mouse with a more premium feel in the hand
At 68g, the Aerox 3 Gen 2 is deliberately and defiantly light, but if you find some heft reassuring, this mouse may feel a little insubstantial by comparison.View Deal

You need more than five programmable buttons
The Aerox 3 Gen 2 keeps things simple with five inputs, which covers the basics comfortably but won’t satisfy players who rely on a full suite of side buttons for macros or keybinds.View Deal

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 review: Also consider

Razer DeathAdder V4 Pro
If the Aerox 3 Gen 2 has whetted your appetite for a more premium wireless gaming mouse, the Razer DeathAdder V4 Pro is the logical next step up. It packs a 45K DPI sensor and 8000Hz polling rate — a step up from the Aerox 3 Gen 2 in every performance metric — and backs it up with an exceptional 150-hour battery life. It will cost you considerably more, but if outright performance is the priority and budget isn’t a constraint, it’s hard to argue. Read our full Razer DeathAdder V4 Pro review.View Deal

Logitech G Pro X2 Superstrike
Another premium option worth a look is the Logitech G Pro X2 Superstrike, whose unique haptic click system allows you to adjust the actuation point and click feel to suit your preferences. It’s significantly pricier than the Aerox 3 Gen 2, and the absence of Bluetooth connectivity is a notable omission at that price point. However, for exacting competitive players who want something genuinely different, it’s worth considering. Read our full Logitech G Pro X2 Superstrike review.View Deal

How I tested the SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2

Tested across multiple gaming sessions and general desktop use
Gaming tested in Cyberpunk 2077 and Apex Legends
Polling rate verified using mousetester.io

I used the SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 across a mix of gaming, notably Cyberpunk 2077 and Apex Legends, and everyday tasks, focusing on responsiveness, comfort, and battery life. Testing included fast-paced shooters and general desktop use to assess responsiveness, comfort, and battery life across real-world conditions. I also ran the mouse through mousetester.io to verify real-world polling rate performance.

Read TechRadar’s reviews guarantee
First reviewed: June 2026

Categories: Reviews

Main menu

Error message

Technology

Navigation

News

Reviews

New forum topics

Creatio CRM Review 2026

The latest 2026 Razer Blade 18 is a monster of a gaming laptop that annihilates the competition – if you can afford the price of admission

'They carve out a special and useful niche': I tested OneOdio's new wireless headphones for music pros and DJs — despite some big issues, that low-latency wireless transmitter means I'll use them every day

I've tested the Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro for six weeks, and it's a powerful, premium Garmin alternative — albeit a lumpy and uncomfortable one

Bitrix24 CRM review

With the second-gen Ring Battery Video Doorbell Plus, the head-to-toe doorbell finally goes 2K

The Yale Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite is a clever, affordable Matter lock with no subscription fee, but a few rough edges

I tested a cheap PS Portal case with a molded interior, charging cable passthrough, and a super-durable build — and it’s become a permanent part of my portable gaming setup

'I really love the way the Cinema Mini sounds': I tested Bluesound's latest small soundbar, and it's the best compact options for audio quality — but the price puts it in dangerous territory

Corsair Makr Pro 75 review: close to being damn near perfect

The KitchenAid KF4 brews a beautifully balanced espresso thanks to its Intelligrind system, but its iced drink menu left me cold

I tested majority's biggest Bluetooth party speaker and while it aces the rugged and durable part, it's no JBL Xtreme 5 — here’s why

I've spent over 30 hours customizing my ship, recruiting crew members, collecting bounties, and combating aliens in Starfield on PS5, and I've still barely scratched the surface of Bethesda's sci-fi RPG

De’Longhi’s bean-to-cup coffee machine makes ‘a cornucopia of coffees’ — but, having tested it, I’ve found its hot and cold drinks are decent rather than exceptional

Arzopa Z3FC review: An ultra-light and thin portable monitor that's perfectly balanced for work and play

I love how much you can tweak the new Razer Huntsman — it's just a shame that you can't make full use of its precise analog switches

Corsair Galleon 100 SD review: Stream Deck meets K70, complete with all the bells and whistles

RugOne Xever 8 review: An extremely rugged phone with a replaceable battery, but it's not quite the next-generation device I hoped for

‘The mechanical switches and hardware customizations are top-tier’: this HyperX gaming keyboard is one of the best I’ve tested — but certain gamers will be disappointed

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 review: same bones, sharper bite

Pages

Main menu

Error message

Technology

You are here

Navigation

News

TechRadar Reviews

Reviews

New forum topics

Pages

Search form

User login