TechRadar Reviews

Mild spoilers follow for The Last of Us season 2 episode 1.

The Last of Us season 2 has a lot to live up to. Its predecessor set a high bar for HBO's TV adaptation of Naughty Dog's popular video game franchise. So, the pressure on season 2 to reach the heady heights of the hit series' first season and authentically adapt the story told in The Last of Us Part II couldn't be greater.

Based on this season's opening episode, 'Future Days', it seems The Last of Us' sophomore season will be a largely faithful take on its gaming namesake. However, future episodes will need to ratchet up the tension, melodrama, and horror-infused action if season 2 wants to be talked about as glowingly as its forebear.

The dark side of us

Some years have passed since we last saw Ellie (left), pictured here with Joel's brother Tommy (right) (Image credit: Liane Hentscher/HBO)

Like The Last of Us Part II game, episode 1 of the hit HBO series' second season reunites us with Joel (Pedro Pascal) and Ellie (Bella Ramsey) after a time jump. Indeed, five years have passed since the explosive season 1 finale where Joel massacred numerous Fireflies to save Ellie's life.

Remember, she's immune to the Cordyceps virus because the Fireflies' doctors believe the fungus has been growing in her brain since she was born. So, they were going to use Ellie's brain to create a vaccine, which would kill Ellie in the process. Cue a furious Joel going on a bloodthirsty rampage to rescue Ellie, seemingly consigning humanity to its fate with no cure to combat the virus, and then lying to Ellie about what actually happened at the Fireflies camp.

I was already convinced that Dever would be a vengeance-fuelled tour de force

One push of the fast-forward button later, and the pair have grown accustomed to life in Jackson, the now-bustling Wyoming town that's become a safe haven from the life-threatening, global scourge that's decimated humanity.

Before we catch up with our intrepid duo, there's the small matter of addressing Joel's murder spree and the deceased Fireflies' devastated relatives left to pick up the pieces. That includes Kaitlyn Dever's Abby, The Last of Us Part II's divisive deuteragonist, whose father is among the people Joel mercilessly gunned down.

What's immediately apparent about Dever's Abby is that she's not as physically imposing as her video-game counterpart. Loathed as Abby is by some The Last of Us fans for events in the game that I won't spoil here, I suspect those same devotees will be vexed over what they perceive to be an unnecessary tweak to her build.

I've no doubt that Dever will deliver a powerful portrayal of Abby in HBO's TV adaptation (Image credit: Liane Hentscher/HBO)

Honestly, though, I don't mind this minor, if controversial, change. Yes, Abby's physicality is a large part of her identity, so the decision to downgrade this part of her character is one reason why fans expressed concern for Dever's welfare in the lead-up to season 2's release.

Nonetheless, based on her portrayal of tough and complex yet empathetic characters in other projects, I was already convinced that Dever would be a vengeance-fuelled tour de force in HBO's small-screen adaptation. My confidence has only grown after witnessing the emotional gravitas she imbues Abby with during her limited screentime in 'Future Days', and I can't wait to see how she builds on the character in Part II in future episodes.

Season 2 isn't afraid to show how Joel and Ellie's once-strong bond has deteriorated

By and large, though, this is still the Ellie and Joel show, and the critically acclaimed Max series isn't afraid to show how their once-strong bond has deteriorated in the time since we last saw them.

A major part of the heartbreaking shift in their relationship is down to Ellie's growth as a person. She's still the oft-amusing, impulsive, and reckless individual we came to adore in The Last of Us season 1, but an animalistic fury – one born out of traumatic events she's endured – now courses through her veins. That means she's not only physically older and more world-weary than last season's Ellie, but also far more temperamental and destructive than before.

Pascal's emotionally rich performance in 'Future Days' tugs at the heartstrings (Image credit: HBO)

Unfortunately for Joel, he bears the brunt of the highly charged verbal torpedoes Ellie lets loose. This is more than a normal teen rebelling against a parent, biological or otherwise, though. Indeed, it's a surrogate father-daughter bond on the verge of total collapse.

A clear animosity has developed between them since The Last of Us TV show's season 1 finale. That much is clear in the plot exposition woven into a conversation between Joel and Isabela Merced's season 2 newcomer Dina, who's an utter delight as Ellie's bestie and Joel's surrogate daughter substitute for Ellie.

Fans of Naughty Dog's games aside, I don't think anyone will be prepared for the breakdown in their relationship – hostilities that'll only grow when that huge showdown between Joel and Ellie occurs. In fact, I'd go as far as to say some viewers will be stunned by this development, especially as they spent little time apart in season 1. Like The Last of Us Part II, 'Future Days' keeps interactions between them to a minimum, which serves to make the brief scenes they share all the more heart-shattering.

Support structures

Merced's Dina is a perfect foil to Ramsey's Ellie in more ways than one (Image credit: Liane Hentscher/HBO)

There's more to one of the best Max shows' return than this season's tritagonists in Joel, Ellie, and Abby, though.

The return of characters from season 1, including Tommy (Gabriel Luna) and Maria (Rutina Wesley), plus the addition of new characters like Merced's Dina, Young Mazino's Jesse, plus Abby's strike team (read more about them in my season 2 cast guide) help to populate this universe with fascinating, complex characters whose relationships will be impacted by the actions of the aforementioned trio. That each new actor fits their character like a glove only makes them more likable and/or intriguing to watch, too.

That each new actor fits their character like a glove only makes them more likable and/or intriguing to watch, too

There's also a largely gratifying expansion of the narrative depicted in Part II. Most are minor narrative improvements that flesh out its story or refine the tale Naughty Dog originally told, but the odd one or two additions might frustrate long-time fans wanting a beat-for-beat re-tread of the game series' latest entry.

One change that won't irk fans is the addition of Gail (Catherine O'Hara), a psychotherapist whose complex relationship with Joel is already a season highlight of mine after season 2's opening episode. I reveled in seeing these powerhouse actors, whose emotion-wracked performances speak louder than words ever could, go toe-to-toe. I really hope we're treated to more similarly intense interactions between them over the course of this season.

O'Hara's Gail is one new addition to HBO's interpretation that builds on its video game counterpart (Image credit: Liane Hentscher/HBO)

The premiere's near-hour-long runtime allows for brief moments of levity to shine through the post-apocalyptic melodrama, too.

Much of that comes by way of Ellie and Dina's endearing puppy love-style dynamic. Ramsey and Merced clearly revel in egging each other on as their respective characters; their playful exchanges punctuating the sobering yet dangerous world they inhabit.

Even though I know what happens in Part II, I'm still keen to see how their relationship evolves.

Ramsey and Merced clearly revel in egging each other on as their respective characters

'Future Days' has already set up fascinating threads for this dynamic with the fallout from their romantically charged dance, Ellie's physical run-in with a new version of the Infected (aka the Stalker), and the ominous, double-headed nature of how this season's premiere ends all set to change the duo's perceptions of, and loyalty to, each other. That's before we even get to that absolutely soul-crushing moment from Part II (if you know, you know) that'll severely impact their friendship.

If there's one criticism I have of 'Future Days', it's that it's the epitome of a calm before the storm-style episode.

Okay, it's supposed to serve as a slow-paced reintroduction to this universe that moves the requisite chess board pieces into place for more heart-pounding, shocking, and revelatory events to come. Still, there are moments of thrilling action and/or location-based exploration in Part II's first few hours of gameplay that, while they can't be directly translated for television, could've been substituted for other suspense-filled storytelling beats.

My verdict

'Future Days' is a purposeful and methodically paced reintroduction to HBO's retelling of The Last of Us, and one I mostly enjoyed. As a catch-up episode, it didn't need to employ a gung-ho storytelling approach. I was also largely satisfied with its near-perfect authentic take on Naughty Dog's source material.

That said, compared to season 1's action-heavy and emotionally devastating opener, it felt somewhat underwhelming in its design. Part II's most heart-rending moment notwithstanding, more thrills and tragedy-laced incidents will be required in future episodes – in season 2 and The Last of Us' recently confirmed third season, both of which cover the story told in Part II – to recapture the infectious magic of its predecessor.

The Last of Us season 2 episode 1 is out now on Max (US and Australia) and Sky Atlantic (UK).

The Hon Altern Task Chair is a minimalist, budget-friendly, modern ergonomic chair designed for home offices and office buildings. It's the basics, nothing flashy, and that's okay.

After testing out all the best office chairs, I didn't expect to like this model. I thought it would be too lightweight, flimsy, and not even comparable to some of the chairs I've reviewed. However, even though it is minimal, it still managed to impress me in a number of ways.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Hon Altern Task Chair: Price and Availability

The Hon Altern Task Chair retails for around $300, depending on your chosen configuration. You can grab one of these chairs from Amazon, Hon's official website, or other office furniture stores like Staples and Wayfair. The company offers a lifetime warranty on the frame and a five-year warranty on mechanical parts. For a $300 chair, that's pretty impressive.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Hon Altern Task Chair: Unboxing & first impressions

Thanks to this chair being super light, the assembly was overall quite simple. Following the directions, I could quickly assemble the pieces in about 12 minutes.

Once I assembled it all, I immediately noticed it looked pretty small compared to some of the more prominent office chairs I get. But that is why it feels so sleek, modern, and minimal- the elegant black color and mesh backing.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Hon Altern Task Chair: Design & build quality Specs

Seat Cushion: 3.5” thick foam
Seat Height: 17.95” to 21.1”
Seat Depth: Adjustable, up to 21”
Back: Mesh, breathable
Weight Capacity: 275 lbs

The Altern has a simple mesh back and a sleek frame surrounding the chair. This combo is excellent for those who run a bit warm like I do, and it's for those who want actual comfort, not the feeling of leaning against a board like some chairs.

Though this chair is small, as I've noted, my team and I had no issues adjusting it to fit all of us. Features like the thigh depth help with leg comfort, especially if you are taller (or adjusting to a shorter thigh depth if you are shorter). Especially paired with a good-height backrest and adjustable armrests.

Moving on, the lumbar support can slide from time to time, though I haven't had a huge issue with this, and there is no tilt-lock to stick yourself in upright no matter how hard you press (okay, maybe you could push hard enough to break something and lean back).

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Hon Altern Task Chair: In use

My team has had this chair in rotation for a while (156 days). Moving from room to room is simple and easy, even from my studio to a workspace. It's not overly complicated with dials and switches to adjust the chair like some that I test, and the cushion is comfortable for all-day work. My team member who usually works with this chair is 5'6" and probably around 190 lbs. It fits him perfectly, and he loves using the chair for long working sessions.

When I jump into this chair, I can still see his comfort level, which is great because usually, one size fits the chair better than others, but it's not bad for a nearly 8-inch difference in height.

A few things I don't love about this chair is that it can look dirty quickly with dust or even slight debris. If anything touches the black, I must immediately wipe it off, including crumbs, dust, shavings from a 3D Printer, fuzz, etc. Additionally, this chair has very simple armrests. This is super helpful for some. I go back and forth. On the one hand, I like that I can lean on these and not worry about them moving away from me (I may or may not have had issues with this in the past), but on the other hand, I do like being able to adjust my chair with 4D armrests to move anywhere I want them.

My team has loved using this chair, and it's held up without any issues. The armrests and pieces are still just as tight and work wonderfully. The chair has yet to creak or sound like it's groaning. I can see why Hon is willing to give such an extended warranty.

Hon Altern Task Chair: Final verdict

The Hon Altern Task Chair is an excellent crossroad between comfort, budget price, and minimalist style. If you're interested in a decent chair that's slim enough to fit where you want it, strong enough to hold you up, sufficient quality to last, and comfortable enough to use all day, the Hon Altern Task Chair is worth considering.

For more office essentials, we've reviewed the best standing desks for the home and office.

Bluetti is one of the more well-known power station companies. They make phenomenal offerings like the AC500, AC200L, and the Handsfree 2 backpack. The Elite 200 V2 is another offering in this quality lineup, expanding the form factor of the AC200 and AC200L with better output, smarter technology inside, and a slightly more compact design.

I've reviewed plenty of the best portable power stations, and this one has explicitly found great use in my workshop area, ensuring that all of my gear is readily charged and good to go. This charges drill batteries, vacuums, toys for the kids, etc. It got me thinking about how great of a solution this power station would be for a job site or in a utility capacity for charging tools out of your truck or van or even making sure you can top off power tools at a construction site.

Alternatively, perhaps you’re not in that line of work; this would also be a good pick for a cabin, a shed, a camper van, or something similar, especially if it's paired with an all-season solar panel to keep you off the grid entirely.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Bluetti Elite 200 V2: Price and Availability

The Elite 200 V2 is frequently discounted to under $1,000 from its regular MSRP of $1,999. That’s a pretty good deal, and if you’re even considering being in the market for a portable power station. You can buy these from Bluetti's website, Amazon, and a handful of other retailers.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Bluetti Elite 200 V2: Unboxing & first impressions

The Elite 200 V2 comes in a simple box with only bare essentials. It has the power station itself, an AC Charging cable, solar cable attachments, a grounding screw, and a manual—nothing out of the ordinary there. The casing and handles help build into this power station's rigidity factor, which, paired with the overall heft, feels quite premium.

It doesn’t have as much casing as some of the more “all-season” units that Bluetti has (review coming soon on a more weather-resistant model), but it still feels like you can knock it around, and it will be fine. The two integrated handles on either side of the top of this unit make moving the power station something I can do on my own, though it’s not something that most would enjoy doing.

If there were one handle, this unit would be flat-out inaccessible to many, if not most, and that’s not to say I’m even some sort of professional lifter of heavy things. My wife and a few co-workers struggled immensely trying to lift this unit into position, even with the two handles. If this is you, the two handles are positioned so you can easily buddy-carry and share the load with a friend (or stranger).

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Bluetti Elite 200 V2: Design & build quality Specs

Capacity: 2,073.6Wh
Output:
4x 120V AC (20A)
2x USB-A (15W)
2x USB-C (100W)
1x 12V/10A car outlet
Input:
AC (up to 1800W)
Solar (up to 1000W)
AC + Solar = 2400W max
DC car (12V or with Charger 1 accessory)
Dimensions: 13.8 × 9.8 × 12.7 in
Weight: 53.4 lbs

As I alluded to in an earlier statement, I am also testing the IP-rated variant of this power station. So, in comparison, this unit is much less rugged, but not in a bad way. I’d consider this a professional-looking power station, ready for the board room just as much as it’s prepared to live in the back of a work truck.

All the ports are on the front of the unit, other than the power inputs (AC and Solar) and the grounding wire, which are all on the right side. The output ports are all on the front, beautifully surrounding the display without encouraging covering the screen.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Bluetti Elite 200 V2: In use

I briefly mentioned above that I've found this machine useful in a workshop area, simultaneously charging up some of my gear. I have also taken this outside (when it wasn't raining) to help keep drills recharged while working on building a giant playset in my backyard. I brought this to a job site where I was helping run conduit, power, and CAT-6 Ethernet in a workspace at a company I work with. When the power was cut, I used this power station to shop lights and keep drills recharged for the team, throwing up a half-wall and drywall.

During this testing, I was impressed with the output capacity of this hefty yet mighty power station. Sometimes, I wish it had more than four ports, but in all of my testing, ID 3. So, while more feels better, I don't usually find myself needing more on the go. And, if I did, I could throw a power strip on there pretty straightforwardly, like what I am doing with a work cart powered by my EcoFlow River 3. This power station only has one AC port with a ground and just a two-prong AC port. Still, I run a robust cart with a dozen outlets mounted all around for ease of use, a Thunderbolt Dock, a monitor, a charging station, and a charger for a few radios. So, if I can run all of that off of a smaller unit, with only one and a half AC ports, you can run plenty with four full three-prong AC ports.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Another excellent use case for this power station would be for emergency backup. It could power a fridge (the time it could run would depend a lot on the type of fridge) for hours, a router, a server, phones, computers, medical equipment, security equipment, and so on.

Bluetti Elite 200 V2: Final verdict

The Bluetti Elite 200 V2 is a fantastic portable power station for most individuals. It is a tremendous all-around Swiss army-knife power station that is great at many things. It's hefty, doesn't have waterproofing, does not come with solar panels, doesn't have wheels, and some features are only accessible with the app.

Still, outside of those few minor inconveniences, not even problems, this power station is excellent. It's dependable, durable, robust, purposefully designed, and all less than $1000. If you're looking to get into portable power stations, need a solid one to add to your fleet, or anywhere in between, this power station is worth considering, especially if it's on one of its sales.

Nank Runner Diver2 Pro: One Minute Review

The Nank Runner Diver2 Pro are unquestionably one of the best pair of bone conduction headphones on the market, and certainly the best pair of waterproof headphones I’ve personally tried in a very long time. They perform well in all areas, offering long-lasting battery life and ample storage, and prove comfortable to wear both on land and in water.

I used the headphones on my runs for quite a few weeks and could find precious little to moan about. Their adjustable hooks allow you to achieve supreme comfort, and you can also adjust the transducers – bend them inwards towards your ear, for example, to activate the Runner Diver2 Pro’s “noise canceling” mode – to suit your needs. Note, though, that noise canceling here isn’t exactly on a par with the ANC you’ll find on the Apple AirPods 2 Pro; you’ll need to wear earplugs to really eliminate sound leakage.

Nevertheless, to expect a pair of bone conduction headphones to feature world-class noise canceling is likely an ask too much. The Diver2 Pro are open-ear headphones that have been designed to enable you to continue to hear the world around you, stay safe on the roads and perform well in water. By their nature, bone conduction headphones don’t shut sound away, which explains the reason that the noise canceling mode disappoints here.

Bone conduction headphones work by using transducers to emit sound waves through your temples towards your eardrums, rather than directly into your ear canals. And coupled with the proprietary magnetic charger, silicone casing and 32GB storage in the Diver2 Pro, allow them to be used in the water, too. Bluetooth signals don’t travel well underwater, so the onboard storage is crucial for swimmers.

Overall, the Nank Runner Diver2 Pro are genuinely well-crafted and well-executed headphones for all manner of sports, from running to swimming. They’re a bit thicker and bulkier than market leader Shokz’ slender offerings, probably in order to accommodate that MP3 player – but we really can’t fault that; the headphones are quick to charge, simple to use and high-performing; they’re great for runners, cyclists and swimmers alike, which will make them near-perfect for triathletes.

Nank Runner Diver2 Pro: Price & Availability

• $199.99 / £154.50 / AU$427.80
• More expensive than OpenRun Pro 2
• Can be found on sale for less

The base price of the Nank Runner Diver2 Pro is $199.99 / £154.50 / AU$427.80. For that sum you get the headphones, the proprietary magnetic charging cable, earplugs, and three sizes of sound-quality enhancers. A carry case is available, but it’s sold separately - which is disappointing considering the price

While the base price is more expensive than the Shokz OpenRun Pro 2, putting the Diver2 Pro at the very top end of bone conduction models, the headphones can frequently be found at a discounted price on both Nank’s own website and third-party outlets such as Amazon. At the time of writing, Nank’s website has the US version of the Diver2 Pro on sale for $159.99, and the UK version for £123.60.

Find them on sale for less, and I’d consider the Diver2 Pro a good buy – especially at that UK price point.

• Value score: 3.5/5

Nank Runner Diver2 Pro: Design

(Image credit: Future)

Weighing around 32g, the Nank Runner Diver2 Pro headphones are light and comfortable both in and out of the water, which is surprising given they come packing 32GB storage. Their silicon casing is remarkably soft, especially on the enclosed earplugs, which are made from the same material. The IP69-rated sealed unit makes the Diver2 Pro headphones fully waterproof and sweatproof; even open-water swimmers can use them without worry of saltwater getting into cracks and crevices.

The magnetic proprietary charger is well designed and clips onto the inside of the unit neatly; however, given the price, I was surprised to see Nank still using USB-A for its charging point. I reckon if we’re expected to pay full-price for these headphones, then USB-C – rapidly becoming the new universal standard due to its faster data transfer and charging speeds – should have been used instead.

The headphone’s arms allow you to pull the transistors towards your ears by up to 35 degrees, delivering greater control over how much sound is heard, while a trio of buttons enable you to skip tracks, adjust volume, and switch between Bluetooth and TF (storage) modes. Patented technology aims to reduce vibrations in the unit – a common problem with bone conduction headsets – by up to 35%. You can also slip the included silicon sound-quality enhancers over the base units, to stick in your ears, to ensure sound is conducted more effectively.

Overall, the Diver2 Pro’s are extremely well-designed: light, durable, comfortable and eminently functional.

• Design score: 5/5

Nank Runner Diver2 Pro: Features

• Noise canceling mode
• Multipoint connections
• Masses of storage

The adjustable arms of the headphones operate the noise canceling mode that Nank advertises: it claims that by pressing sound units closer to the ears and adding ‘noise canceling waves’ that you have the option between open-ear and closed-ear. You can slip the included silicon sound quality enhancers over the base unit, to stick in your ears and ensure sound is conducted more effectively.

However, the real stars of the show here are the multipoint connection with Bluetooth 5.4, which allows you up to two high-quality connections at once to switch between freely, and the built-in storage. The 32GB offered here is generous, holding up to 8,000 tracks – enough for hours upon hours of podcasts, or the longest workout playlist anyone has ever (probably) compiled. You can adjust the volume up and down, switch between modes or skip tracks with the Diver Pro2’s simple button configuration. While this might appear a limited feature set, in terms of bone conduction headphones, the Diver2 Pro are practically feature-rich.

I can’t really think of anything else I’d want on the Runner Diver2 Pro, apart from the ability to isolate the stored music into specific playlists, as I can do on Spotify. However, I can’t imagine how Nank would go about implementing such capability. These headphones are effectively a high-capacity iPod Shuffle at a fraction of the size, built into a pair of headphones. Awesome.

• Features score: 4/5

Nank Runner Diver2 Pro: Performance

(Image credit: Future)

• Great performance and comfort during runs
• Works well in the pool
• Battery lasts ages

I used the Diver2 Pro for multiple runs of varying length in Bluetooth mode, and found them ridiculously easy to set up and simple to use. My one gripe was that I was expecting the volume up/track forward button to be on the front of the unit rather than the rear, which took some getting used to.

Aside from that minor gripe, the headphones were light, comfortable and a pleasure to run with. While I didn’t find the noise canceling mode particularly useful – there was still plenty of ambient noise leakage, and the music just got louder rather than clearer – but this is a small complaint. From the start, the sound was clear, nicely balanced rather than overly-bassy (which is common with bone conduction headphones), plus the headset worked well for taking calls on the go, cutting out some ambient wind noise at my end.

In the pool, I found the Diver2 Pro similarly useful. Loading the built-in MP3 player with music was super simple from a laptop, and switching to storage (or “TF mode”) from Bluetooth was simply a matter of pressing the power button three times in quick succession. Despite an unavoidable change in sound levels as my head rose and fell out of the water during a swim, I could hear my music clearly throughout my swim.

Battery-wise, the headphones performed as described, lasting for around 12 days with plenty of use before needing to recharge. On the occasion I did find the battery low, charging for 10 minutes delivered an extra hour of use.

• Performance score: 5/5

Scorecard Nank Runner Diver2 Pro: Should I buy?

(Image credit: Future) Buy it if...

You’re a triathlete

Find yourself moving from the water to the land during your workouts? These are the headphones to buy.

You need built-in storage

With a whopping 32GB, you need never take your phone out on a run or cycle again.

Money’s no object

These are a premium set of headphones, with a price to match.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You’re on a budget

There are cheaper headphones out there that do the job, albeit not with the same quality nor flare.

You need actual noise cancelers

If you’re looking for headphones that will block out the noise of the gym, you’ll need a pair that actually block your ear canal.

Also consider

Shokz OpenSwim Pro

The market leader in swimming headphones.

Read our full review

Shokz OpenRun Pro 2

We called the OpenRun Pro 2 our ‘ideal runner’s headphones’.

Read our full review

How I tested

I spent weeks testing the Nank Runner Diver2 Pro, going on runs and one pool swim. I drained the battery down with frequent use, charged it again, tried all the modes and loaded songs onto the unit using the proprietary cable.

First reviewed: March/April 2025

Earfun OpenJump: Two minute review

Now that open-ear headphones have evolved from a simple fad to a fully-fledged new kind of headphone (and a hugely competitive one, at that), two rough groups are emerging. On one hand you've got the open-ears designed for fitness use, offering long battery lives and hardy builds so you can run and cycle around traffic; on the other you've got lifestyle open-ears that provide decent music and some useful additional features.

The new Earfun OpenJump seem to want to straddle that divide, landing loosely in the second camp, but offering features which will appeal to the first. Unfortunately, poor timing has hampered what could have been a warm reception.

I associate Earfun with making cheap and cheerful audio tech, but the new OpenJump cost roughly the same as, and came out at the same time as, the Huawei FreeArc. These rival buds trump the Earfuns in myriad ways, with another contemporary (the Honor Earbuds Open) also eclipsing the OpenJump. So it's hard to recommend Earfun's proposition given that you can easily buy those alternatives – and I think, depending on your priorities, you should (although that's a different piece, isn't it? This is about Earfun).

But forgetting its rivals for a second, how do the Earfun OpenJump hold up? Well, they're... decent, but I don't think they'll be remembered for ushering in the new age of open earbuds as much as their H-branded rivals.

The buds are fairly lightweight and comfortable to wear, though some design issues made the fit and gesture controls a little unreliable. There's a decent feature set, particularly with a long-lasting battery life and an in-depth equalizer, and this is almost certainly where the OpenJump stands out.

Unfortunately, the audio quality just isn't there, and I mean that despite some bass tech from Earfun plus the aforementioned equalization options. Until very recently, you couldn't expect top-notch audio from such a design. But times have changed, and although the OpenJump are decent, that isn't quite good enough any more, even for this money.

Something to bear in mind: already in my testing period, Earfun has reduced the OpenJump by a noticeable margin. So there's a good chance that you can find these buds for a significant discount over the price listed below, firmly placing these into cheap earbuds territory. If that's the case, you can ignore a healthy chunk of my criticism here, since you'll be picking up a useful bargain. But at retail price, perhaps it's worth waiting for these to come down.

I really didn't mind using the OpenJump through the testing period, and I see myself continuing to use them until my next pair of open-ears come in. Nothing about them offends or annoys, but also, nothing delights or wows. And in the end, a tech review is meant to be an appraisal of which option is most worthy of your hard-earned cash. It's just too hard to point to the OpenJump as being that, given the competitive state of the market right now.

Earfun OpenJump review: Specifications Earfun OpenJump review: Price and availability

(Image credit: Future)

• Announced in February 2025
• Costs $79.99 / £99.99 / AU$149.99
• Price is variable

The Earfun OpenJump was announced and released in February 2025, ready for everyone who put ‘exercise more’ on their list of New Year’s Resolutions (but didn’t start straight away, for whatever reason).

You can buy the earbuds for $79.99 / £99.99 / AU$149.99 – Earfun’s website has them listed as costing more in certain regions (£129.99 in the UK, for example), and the prices I’m going by are the RRP on Amazon.

In an odd break from Earfun’s modus operandi, that means that these are priced in the mid-range of the open earbuds market, not at the super-cheap cutting edge of it. At that price they’re the same price as the Huawei FreeArc, and there are a fair few open-ear options on Amazon for less – though don’t expect reliability and quality if you don't pay for it.

It’s worth noting that, unlike competitors, Earfun’s open-ear buds are already subject to price cuts and discounts. I found them at $20 off in the US and £40 off in the UK, just one month after their release. So it seems money-saving deals come thick and fast on these buds, however it wouldn't be fair for me to treat these prices as the default, since you may not be so lucky.

Earfun OpenJump review: Design

(Image credit: Future)

• Cheap-feeling plastic charging case
• IPX7-protected buds
• Slightly unreliable fit and gestures

From a distance, the Earfun OpenJump’s case looks like most other open-ear buds’: a medium-sized clamshell. And that’s certainly true, but when you get up close and get the thing in your hand, you realise how cheap the plastic material feels. It didn’t feel very robust either, and I’d be curious to see how durable the case is over a longer amount of time. Even over a relatively short testing time of two weeks, it picked up a few scratches.

Of course, the case is simply for holding and charging the buds. It does that, with a USB-C port for powering up and an indicator LED on the front. On to the buds themselves then, and these look how you'd expect for open-ear designs: they have a bud which is held just over your ear by a sport loop, with a counterweight (and a very little battery pack) tucked behind your ear.

Evidence of how easily-bendable the hook is. (Image credit: Future)

They mostly fit well, and I went on several runs and workouts without issue, but now and then there was slight wobble and which made me worry that they'd fly off at any moment. This was nowhere near as bad as with some other rivals I've tested, mind you, but I've also used other buds without issue.

The buds have an IPX7 rating, meaning that they're protected from immersion in water up to a depth of a meter for up to thirty minutes. Given that the new athletically-minded Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 (although these are in-ear, rather than open-ear) only list a splash-proof IPX4 rating, it's good to see that the Earfuns will handle a puddle drop and survive.

Both buds support gesture controls by tapping once, twice, thrice or tapping and holding. They picked up my taps reliably, but the angle of the sensor meant I kept whacking my ear antihelix when trying to tap them. In a telling move, I soon relied on my phone or smartwatch for music control instead of these sensors.

Unlike some rivals, there's only one color option for the Earfun OpenJump: black. They weigh 8g each so they're pretty light, and they never felt a burden to wear.

• Design score: 3.5/5

Earfun OpenJump review: Features

(Image credit: Future)

• Pairing issues
• Versatile EQ
• Long-lasting battery

I had some troubles during my initial pairing with the Earfun OpenJump, in which my phone wouldn't find the buds it'd paired to, and throughout the testing process the Earfun App listed a profile for phantom OpenJumps which were simply a leftover from the first time I had tried to connect. After a while I got them to connect, and didn't have problems after that, but it's worth bearing in mind. I test earbuds constantly, and I rarely have these issues.

Talking of the Earfun app: it's worth downloading, because it brings a plethora of extras. These include various modes for gaming or streaming movies, the ability to customize touch controls and, most importantly, an equalizer.

(Image credit: Future)

Earfun fans will know that the company offers a fairly robust (possibly to a fault) equalizer. There are countless presets to pick from plus a 10-band equalizer and also a listening test to provide a custom sound profile.

A slight issue with the latter is that, like most other companies' versions, it requires you to listen to a sound until it fades from your hearing... all well and good except that these are open-ears. So by their very design, it's especially hard to tell when audio is soft, or when the sounds of the world are simply creeping in (unless you own a hermetically sealed subterranean bunker in which to conduct these tests).

The OpenJumps have some of the best battery life of any open earbuds that weren't made by OpenRock. The buds themselves will last for 11 hours according to Earfun, and my testing backed that up. The case itself offers a total of 42 hours of listening time before it needs to be charged and if anything, I'd say that my actual listening time seemed to surpass that slightly, up to nearly 44 hours, meaning stamina is one area where these buds are genuinely competitive.

• Features score: 4/5

Earfun OpenJump review: Sound performance

(Image credit: Future)

• 14.2mm driver
• Music is slightly lacking in energy and detail
• Bass redemption tech

The Earfun OpenJump came out at a poor time, released simultaneously alongside the two best-sounding open-ear headphones I've ever used (more on that in the Competition section later), so it was always going to struggle in the sound department. And they certainly do, though not to the extent I was expecting.

That's not a huge surprise given that the open-ear form factor naturally means that the drivers are hanging over your ears with no seal. This form factor still isn't for audiophiles and the OpenJump don't change that.

You're getting a fairly forward sound profile with the OpenJump, but music lacks energy or detail. There's little separation between instruments or any expanse to the soundstage, and it doesn't help that the treble lacks sparkle in a congested, compressed-sounding mix.

(Image credit: Future)

I had hoped that the Theater mode, which is meant to improve the soundstage, would help. While it did seem to spread out the music a little more, it also sadly made the overall performance quite tinny.

Earfun has added a feature which it's cryptically calling 'BassSurge Bass' (I wonder what that does?) and this goes some way into providing a little kick in certain songs, but it's hardly a surge of juicy and impactful low-end frequencies. You could argue that bass-heads should still look for over- or in-ears rather than an open-fit design, but other rivals have managed to deliver better bass, despite the inherent shortfalls of a design that doesn't fully cover or go into your ear canal.

The other bit of tech of note is a 14.2mm driver, which is a fairly standard piece of tech for this kind of bud, and I remember the Nothing Ear (open) had the same.

The OpenJump have quite a lot of noise bleed – again an inevitable part of open-ears given the design, but it was a little more pronounced here than on some other buds I've tested.

• Sound performance score: 3/5

Earfun OpenJump review: Value

(Image credit: Future)

I'm going to use the Amazon price to judge the Earfun OpenJump's value rating, because it seems that the buds are readily accessibly at that lower cost.

These are reasonably affordable open-ears for this price, undercutting some more expensive rivals though not quite offering the refined design, or sonic prowess.

They're certainly not alone at this price point though...

• Value score: 4/5

Earfun OpenJump review: scorecard Earfun OpenJump: Should you buy them?

(Image credit: Future) Buy them if...

You like using an equalizer

Compared to other open-ear rivals, the Earfun OpenJump have one of the best equalizers I've used with lots of options for sound customization.

You prioritise a long-lasting battery

The OpenJump outlast many competitors with their 11-hour listening time, and that's equally true with how much extra power the case offers.

You're on a budget

While not the cheapest open-ears out there, the Earfuns still offer you great value for money, especially if you find them discounted.

Don't buy them if...

You're picky about fit

For many users, anything but the most solid fit for open-ears isn't enough, and these users won't like the OpenJump.

You need best-quality audio

This brand tends to offer decent audio and a great feature-set, and although the feature set is still good here, the audio was a little disappointing.

Also consider

Huawei FreeArc

For the same price as the OpenJump you can buy these buds which sound great, have a sturdy fit and come in a more premium-feeling case. They struggle compared to the OpenJump in the battery life department and the app is a chore to download, but overall, I prefer the Huawei option.

Read our full Huawei FreeArc review

Honor Open Earbuds

These slightly-pricier models have an incredibly slim carry case, a design that's most similar to the Earfuns, and a very good audio offering. Again, the battery life doesn't match up, but for sound and secure fit, Honor wins the race.

Read our full Honor Open Earbuds review

How I tested

I tested the Earfun OpenJump for two weeks prior to writing this review, and before them I'd tested two similarly-priced contemporaries: the Honor Earbuds Open and the Huawei FreeArc.

I used the earbuds paired to my Realme phone for listening to music and podcasts, and the testing took place when I was at home, at the office, cycling through the city, going on runs and working out at the gym.

I've been reviewing gadgets for TechRadar since early 2019 and have used a huge range of tech. This includes other open-ear buds as well as audio offerings from Earfun.

Read more about how we test

• First reviewed: April 2025

Duracell has been around for as long as I can remember. I've got countless memories of grabbing some Duracell batteries to throw in toys, remotes, and other tools growing up, all the way up to toys for my kids. Duracell is a well-known, highly-reputable company that people recognize and trust.

Having reviewed the best portable power stations, I can confidently say this one is meant for everyday use, has excellent ports, and is a simple backup for essentials. However, what sets this power station apart is not the bold design, port offering, power output, or capacity.

What sets this apart is that you can recharge it with a standard AC extension cord. There is no fancy proprietary charger or IEC cable that swears on the cable that you can only use for that power station. Any AC extension cable will do.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Duracell G800: Price and Availability

The Duracell G800 is available through Duracell's official website for only $699 but be warned that it frequently sells out. They offer a smaller variant, but if you're going with this company, I'd choose this larger one for portable power stations.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Duracell G800: Unboxing & first impressions

When I first found the Duracell G800, I thought it was a gimmick. A power station resembling a famous battery wouldn't work well. But, once I got it, I was proven wrong. The build quality is excellent, the packaging is professional and straightforward, the handle is comfortable to carry, the port offering is fantastic, and then I noticed the way to charge, and I realized this is working hard to compete right out of the gate.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Duracell G800: Design & build quality Specs

Battery Capacity: 620Wh
Output: 800W (shared across 3 AC ports)
Ports:
• 3x AC Outlets (total 800W shared)
• 3x USB-A (7.2A shared)
• 2x USB-C (100W per port, 200W total)
• 1x Car charger port (120W max)
Weight: 19.4 lbs
Dimensions: 12.5” x 8.3” x 11.5”

The Duracell G800 is a unique look. It's got a bronze top half to resemble the famous battery, but what's great is that Duracell chose to make the line between the black and copper a ring light, helping light whatever you may be trying to plug in, in the dark, without power, thus the need for a power station.

Further, the handle is solid and firm, and there is some integrated storage on the backside of the power station to help carry the power cable or any USB-C/USB-A cables.

Thankfully, all the main ports are on the front, which I appreciate. It makes for a portable power station that is easy to use, allowing for this to be set down and forgotten about while charging whatever you may be keeping charged.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Duracell G800: In use

Admittedly, I've had this G800 for around 160 days. However, in that time, I've had my team put this thing to the test in real-life scenarios. I've had this power station help out when charging cameras on the go out of the back of my Jeep, charging iPads and computers on a long trip, and being a light source and emergency power in a power outage. I've had this power station help out my family in Florida during the crazy hurricanes this last year. In all the scenarios, this power station functioned great. The handle makes it easy to maneuver in all of these environments, and the forward-facing ports mean that all ports are accessible simultaneously.

Throughout my time testing, the most standout feature is that this unit recharges with a standard AC extension cord outlet. One thing that makes a power station less usable is when it has a proprietary charger or a unique charger that works only for that unit. It makes recharging more cumbersome, more challenging in many ways, and more expensive if you ever damage or misplace your charger. With Duracell, they chose to go the opposite route of an Apple with the (late) Lightning cable, and they decided to go with a cable option that is nearly everywhere (in the US). This may be an intentional move, or it's beginner's luck; regardless, I am a fan.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

While testing, I got this power station recharged to an impressive 80 percent in about an hour, just as Duracell suggests. I got my 13-inch M2 MacBook Pro fully recharged about 8.5 times, depending on just how heavily I ran it when plugged in (I run my computers hard with all that I do in a day).

Duracell promotes being able to run a Wi-Fi router for around 26 hours, a TV (very generic) for 5 hours, a mini cooler for 22 hours, a drone for 26 charges, and lights for 6.7 hours.

If you want to extend your off-grid power, plug in a G-Solar Panel to recharge the power station directly from the sun.

Duracell G800: Final verdict

Overall, the Duracell Power 800 is a quality power station, especially for the price, making it a great travel, camping, and home backup for smaller items that need to be charged. Sadly, it does not have app control, but it does have nice features such as a built-in light ring and that handy ability to recharge with a simple standard AC extension cord.

Last I checked (and surprisingly, I check pretty often), Dell is still the top monitor brand in the world. They dominate the display game primarily due to their professional monitor line-ups. In 2025, they will continue to put out spectacular panels for their business customers, offering what the people need and will need in the foreseeable future. The UltraSharp line-up has led this charge of premium office monitors for quite some time, with the U3225QE as the newest release.

Unless you have a super simple setup and you can get away with plugging your laptop directly into your monitor over HDMI, and then your setup is complete, most people benefit from a dock in one way or another. It may not be used heavily every single moment, but having a dock where you can plug in other cables, plug-in drives, or accessories and access your computer can be super handy. Another thing that not many setups have, but many would benefit from, is a KVM dock.

Dell's U3225QE continues the legacy Dell has set forth with a gorgeous panel, the world's most comfortable display, an integrated Thunderbolt Dock, and a KVM switch.

This is easily one of the best business monitors for those working on multiple devices in the professional space.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Dell U3225QE: Price and Availability

The Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub is priced at $949.99 and is available at Dell and other business monitor resellers. It is backed by a 3-year Advanced Exchange Warranty, which includes access to the premium panel exchange. One thing to note is that only a mere fraction of Dell monitors are purchased through Dell, and most are purchased through a third party.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Dell U3225QE: Unboxing & first impressions

The box for this Dell Monitor was a little different than the standard brown box I've expected from most monitor manufacturers. This one was in a black box with a photo of the monitor on the front and prominent Dell branding. Once unboxing, though, everything felt familiar.

Within the contents are the monitor, a stand, a Thunderbolt 4 Cable, a DisplayPort Cable, a USB-C to USB-A cable, and the IEC power cable. The monitor stand and base are the same as those used by Dell for years. It works well, has integrated cable routing, and is height-adjustable.

However, it also takes up a lot of space. So, I usually opt for a monitor arm. Thankfully, as most monitors are these days, this monitor has a VESA mounting capacity, so I could put this display on the Mount-It monitor arm I had set up already.

Once I got the monitor arm mounted, the other things I noticed immediately included the pop-out ports, the plethora of ports on the back, the fantastic display, and my appreciation for IEC monitors in general.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Dell U3225QE: Design & build quality Specs

Size: 31.5” (4K UHD, 3840 x 2160)
Panel Type: IPS Black (3,000:1 contrast)
Refresh Rate: 120Hz
Color Accuracy: 100% sRGB, 99% DCI-P3 / Display P3, Delta E < 1.5
Brightness: 450 nits (typ.), 600 nits peak HDR
HDR Cert: DisplayHDR 600
Ports: 2x Thunderbolt 4, 2x DisplayPort 1.4 (in/out), 1x HDMI 2.1, 2.5GbE RJ45, 7 USB downstream, 3.5mm audio-out

Dell's monitors all look like they belong together. This one is no different. It's a black panel front with minimal bezels, a light grey plastic backing, and ports at the bottom middle of the back of the display. Another thing that I appreciate about Dell is that there is minimalist branding all around. That makes it an easy choice to toss this monitor on my testing desk and be able to leave it there without it looking like a branding piece or a gaudy flashy display.

Dell also made sure to include some front-facing ports since this is a Thunderbolt dock as well. There is a pop-out grouping of ports on the left-hand bottom bezel, allowing for ease of access when needed, and then it can be clicked back in place when not in use.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Dell U3225QE: In use

I'll speak quickly to a few different use cases for this monitor. This display is fantastic for people who need an all-in-one display in an office or workspace, especially if you have multiple devices. This monitor is also great for the home office and can be used for work and play, all on the same display. Another use case would be for videographers looking for a significant multi-use display.

For my use case, I have the Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor on my secondary desk, which is directly behind my main desk. I have it on my Flexispot E7 Plus desk, with a Grovemade desk shelf, a Mount-It Monitor arm, and a Grovemade desk pad. I added a nice BenQ lightbar to the top and a few other gadgets around the desk to finish it.

For the last few weeks, I've had this monitor as my computer and peripheral testing area, making it super easy to plug in any laptop to the USB-C cable to charge and run data and video, all to the built-in hub on the back of the monitor. I can also run any HDMI or DisplayPort to the monitor, making it easy to plug in any desktop I am testing, any gaming system for after-hours fun, an Apple TV (for the screensavers and aesthetic vibes), and just about anything else. All of this without a dock since the monitor has it all built-in.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Translating this to the business world, this could be your all-in-one display. It's got super rich IPS Black colors, even though it's not running an OLED Panel, so it will look great with your content, no matter what you're doing on it. It's a 120Hz refresh rate, making the display buttery smooth, especially when you pair it with the 4K resolution and great colors. All around, the picture is brilliant. I'd suggest this as your only monitor if it fits the specs and price you're looking for.

Regarding features, the monitor has a built-in KVM on top of the Thunderbolt Dock, which I have already discussed. What's great about a built-in KVM is that you can switch displays for multiple computers/devices and swap around your inputs and peripherals simultaneously. Picture this: the Dell UltraSharp 32-inch 4K is your only monitor. You work from home. You can easily have your work machine plugged in, whether it is a laptop or a desktop. During the day, you can quickly finish your work on this brilliant panel, knocking out multitasking or project management, coding, writing, or virtual meetings. Then, when you're on lunch, you can press a button and swap your mouse, keyboard, webcam, mic, and any other accessories you want over to your personal laptop to check on the game, check your personal emails, work on your side project, video call a family member, or whatever else. Then, you can swap right back to your work machine with another simple press. No more needing multiple keyboards or having all your gear spread across a desk in a cluttered mess. Better yet, thanks to the great inputs, you can even have your gaming system plugged in, so after the workday, you can swap into an evening of gaming if you so choose.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Further, if one monitor is insufficient, Dell allows for daisy chaining these monitors, meaning you can still run a one-cable setup. Still, you can have several of these monitors side by side or stacked to give you even more digital real estate.

Sadly, there is no speaker built into this display. I say sadly, but at the same time, I only ever use monitor speakers for the occasional internal Google Meet, where I don't need brilliant audio; I need to be able to hear my teams. So, while it's a loss, I'd be frustrated at the quality if there was a speaker. And, if I wanted a good speaker, I could get the web conferencing variant like the Dell P3424WEB, but then I wouldn't need one of the best business webcams, which have great features in and of themselves.

Dell U3225QE: Final verdict

The Dell UltraSharp U3225QE is a gorgeous monitor that would be a perfect productivity companion for almost everyone. It's got impressive connectivity options, excellent pictures, 120Hz buttery smooth motion, and one of the best-rated eye-friendly screens on the market. It's not perfect, but for the vast majority, it's precisely what you'd want and need.

For more essentials, we've reviewed the best business computers and the best business laptops.

LG G5: Two-minute review

The LG G5 is the company’s flagship TV for 2025, and it changes the game for OLED TV tech with a completely new panel design that delivers notably higher brightness than its LG G4 predecessor. I’ll get into the specifics of that in the Picture Quality section of this review, but what you need to know is that with its impressive, mini-LED TV-rivalling brightness, the G5 succeeds brilliantly in bringing the best OLED TVs out of the darkness as a viable option for daytime, bright room viewing.

LG’s G4 relied on a micro lens array (MLA) layer to boost brightness over what conventional OLED TVs were capable of, but the new LG G5 incorporates a new Primary RGB Tandem structure OLED display panel. This uses individual red, green, and blue layers to produce light, and the resulting brightness is not only leaps and bounds better than what the G4 achieved with MLA, but it also yields improvements in color reproduction.

You’d think that the G5’s revamped display panel would command a higher price, but the LG pricing is equivalent to its G4 predecessor. However, at $3,399 / £2,399 / AU$5,299 for the 65-inch model I tested, it’s still very much a premium TV.

Along with higher brightness and richer color, the LG G5 offers a range of features that make it a flexible option for viewing in a range of lighting conditions. These include a new, more effective anti-glare screen, and a Filmmaker Ambient Light Mode that uses the TV’s built-in light sensor to dynamically adjust brightness without sacrificing picture accuracy in the process.

LG’s Alpha 11 AI processor Gen 2 is responsible for a range of AI picture and sound enhancements on the G5. These include AI Picture and Sound modes, voice recognition, and personalized content recommendations.

LG’s webOS 25 smart TV interface has been tweaked with the ability to switch between customized home screen layouts that get triggered by the viewer’s voice, and there are now onscreen wizards to guide you through the process of setting up unique AI picture and sound presets to accompany your custom home screen.

LG’s flagship G-series OLEDs are designed for wall-mounting, and the G5 has an Always Ready mode that lets the TV be used as a frame for displaying photos and art (now including images generated by AI with the TV’s assistance). But it's also a highly capable gaming TV, with support for 4K 165Hz, Nvidia G-Sync, and AMD FreeSync Premium. The G5’s Quick Card gaming portal also provides over 500 titles plus Nvidia GeForce Now, Luna, and other apps, and Xbox Game Pass support should be added during the start of 2025.

While the LG G5 has turned out to be a best-in-class OLED TV option for 2025, many people will be equally pleased with its step-down LG C5 model, which is already looking to be one of 2025's best TVs. The C5 isn't as bright as the G5, but you’ll save quite a bit by going with LG’s mid-range OLED .

LG G5 review: Price and release date

The LG G5 is the brightest OLED TV we've yet reviewed (Image credit: Future)

• Release date: April 2025
• 48-inch: £1,799
• 55-inch: $2,499 / £2,399 / AU$4,199
• 65-inch: $3,399 / £3,299 / AU$5,299
• 77-inch: $4,499 / £4,499 / AU$7,999
• 83-inch: $6,499 / £6,999 / AU$9,999
• 97-inch: $24,999

The LG G5 is widely available in 55- to 83-inch screen sizes. A 48-inch model is also available in the UK, and a 97-inch option in the US, though those models don’t use the same Primary RGB Tandem structure panel as the other sizes, and won't be as bright.

Prices for the G5 series are equivalent to last year’s LG G4 series, despite the inclusion of a new panel design, but are notably higher than the mid-range LG C5 series OLED TVs.

LG G5 review: Specs LG G5 review: Benchmark results LG G5 review: Features

The LG G5 has four HDMI 2.1 ports with 4K 165Hz support (Image credit: Future)

• Fourth-generation panel with Brightness Booster Ultimate
• Filmmaker Ambient Light Mode debuts here
• 4K 165Hz gaming support on PC

A key feature of the LG G5 is a new fourth-generation OLED display panel with Primary RGB Tandem structure. In contrast to previous designs, which used two blue OLED layers plus a third layer with red, green, and yellow elements, the new panel uses individual red, green, and blue layers to produce light.

This “four-stack” structure benefits from increased brightness and enhanced color purity due to the panel’s use of separate OLED layers for the primary colors. Unlike the previous LG G4, the G5 doesn’t rely on a micro lens array (MLA) layer with microscopic lens elements to boost brightness.

LG refers to its new display panel tech as Brightness Booster Ultimate, and it’s accompanied by several other features to boost picture quality in a range of room lighting conditions. The first is an anti-reflective layer that LG says provides 30% higher glare resistance than last year’s G4.

Another is Filmmaker Ambient Light Mode, which uses the TV’s built-in light sensor to map gamma and PQ (the HDR equivalent of gamma) based on room lighting conditions. The G5 also has Perfect Black certification, which confirms that a TV can display less than 0.24 nits in conditions of up to 500 lux.

The G5’s Alpha 11 AI processor Gen 2 enables a range of AI-based picture and sound enhancements, including AI Picture and AI Sound modes. Picture and sound wizards guide you through setting up customized presets based on your response to a series of images and sound samples, and once completed, these can be automatically switched on for the specific users who created them based on voice recognition.

That also goes for the layout of the TV’s webOS 25 Home Screen – if you customize the app selection in your user profile, it'll switch to the layout you prefer when it detects your voice if you use the voice control system at all.

The G5 also gets a gaming boost over last year’s G4, with 4K 165Hz support for PC gaming along with Nvidia G-Sync and AMD FreeSync Premium. LG’s Gaming Portal offers over 500 game titles, with support for both Xbox and Luna controllers and Xbox Game Pass (coming in the first half of 2025, according to LG).

Usability features include AirPlay 2 and Chromecast built-in, along with hands-free voice control. The ThinQ screen in the webOS interface lets you configure devices to be controlled via Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, Matter and Apple HomeKit, and there’s also a new, streamlined Magic Remote and more advanced AI Chatbot feature that can diagnose picture and sound issues.

• Features Score: 5/5

LG G5 review: Picture quality

The G5's picture looks bright and punchy even in well-lit rooms (Image credit: Future)

• Exceptional brightness for an OLED
• Anti-reflection layer in the screen
• Some issues with certain streaming formats

The LG G5 holds the distinction of being the brightest OLED TV we’ve yet measured at TechRadar. Peak brightness on a 10% HDR white window pattern in Filmmaker Mode measured 2,268 nits, and it was 1,850 nits in Standard picture mode. Those numbers are what we typically expect to see from higher-end examples of the best mini-LED TVs, and they best the Samsung S95D – our previous brightest OLED TV champion – by a sizeable margin.

The G5’s fullscreen HDR brightness measured 331 nits in Filmmaker Mode and 297 nits in Standard mode. That represents a boost over last year’s G4, which measured 257 in Filmmaker Mode, but it’s not the 40% fullscreen brightness boost that LG had previously cited for the G5. Measured in Vivid mode, the G5’s fullscreen brightness was 419 nits, a number closer to LG’s claim.

The G5’s color gamut coverage measured 99.6% for UHDA-P3 and 81.3% for BT.2020 in Filmmaker Mode. Those results are better than what we measured on the G4, and they match the Samsung S95D’s UHDA-P3 coverage.

The average Delta-E value (the margin of error between the test pattern source and what’s shown on-screen) for color accuracy was 1.2, which is excellent. (Any result under 3 is regarded as indistinguishable to the human eye.)

Given the LG G5’s high brightness, there was no need to dim the lights to make the picture look good – contrast, color saturation, and shadow detail all held up nicely even with my room’s overhead lighting on. That’s certainly not something you can say about all OLED TVs, which typically lag behind their mini-LED counterparts when it comes to brightness.

The new G5's new "four stack" OLED panel offers enhanced color performance over last year's G4 (Image credit: Future)

Even with the comparatively subtle Filmmaker Mode active, The Pitt (streamed via Max), a TV show that mostly takes place in a brightly lit hospital emergency room, looked staggeringly bright on the G5.

And darker shows such as Severance (on Apple TV+) could be watched in brighter room lighting conditions without losing black depth and shadow detail. That’s partially due to the TV’s anti-reflective layer, which manages to reduce screen glare without elevating black levels, but also its Filmmaker Mode Ambient Light setting, which uses the G5’s light sensor to adjust gamma (or PQ for programs with HDR) based on room lighting conditions.

Viewing the season 2 final episode of Severance, a scene where Mark S and Helly R chat furtively in the Lumon office showed off all the LG G5's best aspects. The background of the dark workspace was a deep, rich black, and the light from the data terminals bathed their faces with a striking blue and green glow. The refined shadow detail gave the picture a powerful sense of depth that, for me, really drove home the point of why you would spend top dollar for a premium OLED TV like the G5.

An LG G5 review from our colleagues at What Hi-Fi? cited an issue with streamed Dolby Vision movies and shows, resulting in posterization and blocky picture artifacts when watching dark scenes. My G5 review sample showed the same posterization on at least one movie, Alien: Romulus (streamed via Apple TV), though it wasn't an issue on other streamed dark Dolby Vision content I watched.

What Hi-Fi? later reported that an LG software update scheduled for a late April release fixes this Dolby Vision glitch, and after installing a pre-released version of that update, the posterization on Alien: Romulus disappeared, though it created other picture quality issues when streaming from the G5's Apple TV app, adding strange horizontal lines in some dark scenes.

Without these problems, the TV would score five stars for picture quality. These problems are very situational, which means I'm still happy giving the TV an overall score that marks it as best-in-class. Once we've fully tested the wide release version of LG's software update, we will update this review, and if these problems are removed as expected, I'll update this section.

The G5’s motion handling was impressive, with a reference clip from No Time to Die – in which James Bond traverses a rugged hillside cemetery as the camera pans along – showing only minimal judder and blur. This same scene can look downright wobbly on some TVs.

Enabling the TV's Cinematic Movement setting in the TruMotion menu effectively removed any residual motion artifacts without introducing a 'soap opera' effect.

Sports also looked great – the NCAA basketball championship aired during my time testing the G5 – with fast motion looking solid and the TV’s bright, contrast-rich picture bringing out the vivid colors of the players’ uniforms.

• Picture quality score: 4.5/5

LG G5 review: Sound quality

The G5's 1-inch-thin frame is designed for a flush-mount against a wall and the TV comes with wall-mounting hardware (Image credit: Future)

• 4.2-channel speaker system
• Effective AI Sound Pro mode
• Sound Wizard for creating custom sound preset

The LG G5’s built-in 4.2-channel speakers take things up a notch from the 2.2-channel array built into the LG C5. An AI Sound Pro mode provides a virtual 11.1.2-channel upmix that makes a clear difference in the spaciousness of soundtracks when watching movies, but it also thins out the bass.

While Dolby Atmos is supported on the G5, DTS formats, disappointingly, are not. This is a step backwards from the G4, which had DTS support – though this won't be a problem for people using an AV receivers, and some soundbar setups.

Similar to the TV’s Picture Wizard, a Sound Wizard guides you through the process of creating a customized sound preset. This is entirely optional, and this preset doesn’t work when the TV is connected to a soundbar.

A useful WOW Orchestra mode lets you combine the output of the TV’s speakers with the speakers of a compatible LG soundbar when used together, for a bigger overall soundstage.

The movies and TV shows I watched on the G5 all sounded good, with clear dialogue and good spatial positioning of effects, especially with the AI Sound Pro mode active. The sound could also go fairly loud without coming across as strained.

Even so, given how good the G5’s picture looks, it would be a shame not to pair it with one of the best Dolby Atmos soundbars or dedicated home theater speakers.

• Sound quality score: 4/5

LG G5 review: Design

An aluminum pedestal may be an extra cost option for the G5 (Image credit: Future)

• Wall-mount hardware included
• Optional pedestal stand
• New, streamlined AI Magic Remote control

The G5 comes with wall-mounting hardware at all screen sizes, and a pedestal stand is available as an optional extra in the US. In the UK, you can choose if you want the stand or the mount in some sizes.

LG’s sturdy aluminum stand, which I used during my G5 review, allows for both an elevated height to accommodate a soundbar, or a lower height where the TV sits directly on the stand’s surface.

G5 TVs are designed to be wall-mounted, with the thin, 1-inch panel aligning perfectly flat against a wall like a picture frame when you use the dedicated mount.

The TV’s nearly non-existent bezel gives it an 'all-picture' look that adds to the art-like quality, and a connection panel located on the back with bottom and side-mounted ports, along with cable management hardware, lets you hook up sources without detracting from the neat look.

Connections on the G5 include four HDMI 2.1 inputs, an RF antenna input, three USB ports and an Ethernet port.

LG’s new AI Magic Remote for the G5 is more compact and streamlined than previous Magic Remotes, with a flat surface, a reduced button layout, and a smaller central scroll wheel. Unfortunately, not all regions get this new, mostly improved design, though it was included with my review sample in the US.

The UK still gets a design with channel buttons, though it does include new AI keys.

The new AI button provides quick Chatbot access, and there’s also a dedicated button to call up the TV’s ThinQ screen. I never really had a problem with the previous Magic Remote, but some users may prefer the more traditional design of this new version.

• Design score: 4.5/5

LG G5 review: Smart TV and menus

LG's webOS 25 interface has been enhanced with multiple viewer profiles and picture settings that can be activated by voice (Image credit: Future)

• webOS 25 smart interface
• Always Ready feature with 'ambient mode' option
• Quick Cards and Quick Menu for easy app and settings access

The G5 uses LG’s webOS 25 interface, which is one of the best smart TV systems going. Like other smart TV interfaces, the top third is dedicated to a promotional banner (in this case, one mostly directing you to the LG Channels free ad-supported TV portal), alas, but below that is a Quick Cards section that provides hubs for Sports, Games, Music, Home and more.

The Home Card hub provides information about connected wired and wireless sources, which can be accessed using the TV’s remote control. It also lets you connect to Google Home, Matter, and LG ThinQ smart devices, which can be controlled directly from the TV.

The order of apps in the home screen’s middle section can be edited according to which ones you use most, and there’s also a Live TV option that shows a grid of both broadcast TV channels pulled in by the best indoor antennas and ones available on the LG Channels portal.

An Always Ready feature that needs to be enabled in the General menu lets you display images (including from your personal photo library) when you’re not using the TV, including ones that can be generated using AI. When in Always Ready mode, the voice recognition and AirPlay/Chromecast remain active, so you don’t have to power it on to use those functions.

A very useful webOS feature is the Quick Menu, which appears as a transparent overlay on the screen’s left side that lets you select between picture and sound modes, among other settings. You can also access the TV’s AI Chatbot from here, which can be used to guide you through the G5’s many settings and features.

The TV’s AI Picture wizard can be useful for creating a preset that corresponds to your preferences, but I found that the one I dialed in was overly cool-looking for my preference, despite it theoretically following my preferences, and I stuck with Filmmaker Mode instead for most viewing.

While I generally found navigating the TV’s menus to be easy, and was satisfied with the wide range of options for adjusting picture and sound, I found it annoying that the new, redesigned Magic Remote control lacks an input button for switching sources.

It’s easy enough to do that by pressing the Home hub button on the remote and then navigating to a specific source, but input select is nonetheless a button that should be included on every TV remote.

• Smart TV & menus score: 5/5

LG G5 review: Gaming

A Game Dashboard allows for easy gaming-related picture and sound adjustments (Image credit: Future)

• Four HDMI 2.1 ports
• 4K 165Hz, FreeSync Premium and Nvidia G-Sync
• 9.2ms input lag (Boost mode)

LG TVs have fantastic gaming credentials, and the G5 continues in that tradition of the best gaming TVs. Its four HDMI ports support 4K 165Hz, FreeSync Premium and Nvidia G-Sync. Input lag measured in Game Optimizer mode with a Bodnar 4K input lag meter was 9.2ms in Boost mode, which is about as low as TVs get.

The G5’s Game Card Gamung Hub offers over 500 games and apps, including Nvidia GeForce Now and Luna. (Xbox Game Pass support is coming in the first half of 2025, according to LG.)

When in Game Optimizer mode, a Game Dashboard pop-menu provides quick access to a range of adjustments and presets, which can be selected without pausing the game you’re playing.

The brightness level of the G5 is great here, again, because it means its good for playing in the day time without severe mirrored reflections distracting from what you're trying to focus on.

• Gaming score: 5/5

LG G5 review: Value

LG's new, streamlined Magic Remote (Image credit: Future)

• Priced competitively with premium OLED competition
• Step-down LG C5 OLED also excellent
• Very good overall value

At $3,399 / £3,299 / AU$5,299 for the 65-inch model I tested, the LG G5 is priced higher than another 2025 premium OLED, the Samsung S95F, which has a similarly high brightness as the G5 plus a Glare-Free 2.0 screen that’s even more effective at eliminating reflections in bright rooms.

The G5 is also priced lower in the US than another 2025 premium OLED, the Sony Bravia 8 II, which will sell for $3,999 in a 65-inch screen size… however, in the UK, the Bravia 8 II is actually priced slightly lower than the 65-inch G5, just to mix things

If you don’t require super-high brightness and want to save some money, the LG C5 ($2,699 / £2,699 at 65 inches) is an excellent choice. The C5’s peak brightness is roughly half of what we measured on the G5, but it's full of features and its picture quality is still exceptional, especially when viewed in a light-controlled environment.

Given its fantastic all-around performance, great features, and more affordable cost compared to some of its high-end OLED competition, the G5 earns high ratings for value.

• Value score: 4/5

Should I buy the LG G5?

(Image credit: Future) Buy it if...

You want to watch in bright rooms
The G5 OLED’s brightness rivals that of premium mini-LEDs. It also features an effective anti-glare screen and a Filmmaker Ambient Light Mode that compensates for brighter rooms without sacrificing picture accuracy.

You want a TV for wall-mounting
With a slim, wall-hugging design, the G5 is specifically designed for wall-mounting and a specially designed bracket is provided.

You want a great TV for gaming
With support for 4K 165Hz, FreeSync Premium, and Nvidia G-Sync, and an impressively low 9.1ms input lag, the G5 is about as good as gaming TVs get.

Don't buy it if…

You don’t want to use a soundbar
The G5’s 4.2-channel speakers deliver more than adequate sound, but a TV this impressive should ideally be paired with a soundbar or external speakers for a complete experience.

You want HDR10+ support
LG TVs support Dolby Vision, but not the HDR10+ high dynamic range format. That could be an issue if you have some 4K Blu-rays that include this format and not Dolby Vision.

You want to save money
LG’s mid-range C5 series OLED TVs aren’t as bright as the G5 series, but they cost considerably less and also provide excellent picture quality and a great array of features.

LG G5 review: Also consider...

Samsung S95F
We haven’t yet reviewed the Samsung S95F, but we have seen it in action extensively and, like the G5, it combines an impressively bright OLED picture with effective anti-screen reflection tech. Initial US pricing for the S95F is also lower than for the G5.

LG C5
The C5 isn’t as bright as the G5, but it’s a great all-around TV that’s also feature-packed for the price, as we observed in our LG C5 review. This mid-range OLED is a good alternative if you don’t need its picture to stand out high ambient light viewing environments.

Sony Bravia 9
Sony’s flagship TV is about as premium as mini-LED gets, and we appreciated its bright yet refined picture and powerful sound in our Sony Bravia 9 review. Like the G5, it’s a pricey option, but a good choice if you prefer to not use a soundbar.

How I tested the LG G5

Measuring a 10% HDR white window pattern during testing (Image credit: Future)

• I spent about 20 hours in total measuring and evaluating
• Measurements were made using Calman color calibration software
• A full calibration was made before proceeding with subjective tests

When I test TVs, I first spend a few days or even weeks using it for casual viewing to assess the out-of-box picture presets and get familiar with its smart TV menu and picture adjustments. I next select the most accurate preset (usually Filmmaker Mode, Movie or Cinema) and measure grayscale and color accuracy using Portrait Displays’ Calman color calibration software.

The resulting measurements provide Delta-E values (the margin of error between the test pattern source and what’s shown on-screen) for each category, and allow for an assessment of the TV’s overall accuracy.

Along with those tests, I make measurements of peak light output (recorded in nits) for both standard high-definition and 4K high dynamic range using 10% and 100% white window patterns. Coverage of DCI-P3 and BT.2020 color space is also measured, with the results providing a sense of how faithfully the TV can render the extended color range in ultra high-definition sources.

For the LG G5, I used the Calman ISF workflow, along with the TV’s advanced picture menu settings, to calibrate the image for best accuracy. I also watched a range of reference scenes on 4K Blu-ray discs to assess the TV’s performance, along with shows streamed from Max, Netflix, and other services.

You can read an in-depth overview of how we test TVs at TechRadar for more information.

• First reviewed: April 2025
• Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x: Two-minute review

(Image credit: Future)

The Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x offers plenty of benefits in almost every department, all powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon Elite X processor: this is a laptop built with creativity in mind, coming with one of the best OLED displays you'll ever see, battery life that'll keep your charger out of use for almost an entire day, and perhaps most importantly fast multitasking experiences with up to 32GB of RAM (though its soldered, so you'll have to pick the model that's ideal for you).

Its slim and sleek design, along with the 14-inch display size, allows the 90Hz OLED panel to blossom - believe it or not, this beats the excellent Alienware AW3423DWF QD-OLED ultrawide monitor at HDR with True Black HDR 600 certification compared to 400. Burn-in is, of course, still a concern - as with any OLED - but utilizing Windows 11's helpful tools, such as automatically hiding the taskbar, will go a long way in preventing it.

The Slim 7x isn't all perfect, though, as you'll only have access to USB-C ports. There's no USB-A port or even an audio jack, so the only solution for external connections that don't use USB-C would be a dock.

While gaming is possible with acceptable frame rates (since this isn't a gaming laptop), it's held back by the 3K (2944 x 1840) resolution, which I'll delve deeper into later on - don't buy this laptop if you're intent on serious gaming, especially at its native resolution.

To give you a brief summary, I tested less demanding titles like Hades and Sifu, with the latter struggling to stay above 60fps at 1440p on low graphical settings - that should be enough of an indication that this system isn't built for gaming, but it can still hit surprisingly hard at lower resolutions.

Besides this, it does exactly what it promises, providing enough power and speed for your creativity - the 12-core Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 processor offers a nippy 3.4GHz clock speed, and after my testing within a handful of CPU-intensive applications, this easily joins the list of my favorite machines and certainly is among the best laptops of 2025.

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x: Price & Availability

• How much does it cost? Starting at $1,049 / £1,249.99 / AU$2,609
• When is it available? Available now
• Where can you get it? In the US, UK, and Australia

Whilst its price ($1,049 / £1,249.99 / AU$2,609) might throw you off a potential purchase, the specifications make up for it in a variety of ways. I'll highlight the benefits of the gorgeous OLED screen on this laptop shortly, but considering the price of OLED panels in general when it comes to not just laptops but also gaming monitors and TVs, there's always going to be a premium to pay - this can't be faulted either, as it remains the best among all display types.

It would also be a disservice not to mention the Qualcomm Snapdragon 12-core processor, especially when it comes to multitasking - running multiple applications and tabs simultaneously. The Snapdragon X Elite loses out to Apple's M3 chip in single-core processes, but matches the Apple Silicon chip in multi-core workloads, providing a satisfying experience catering towards productivity.

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x: Specs Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x: Display

Now, starting with this laptop's display: the OLED panel present here is, hands down, the stand-out aspect. You may have wondered why I mentioned Dell's Alienware QD-OLED ultrawide monitor earlier - I happen to own that display, and it's magnificent when using either DisplayHDR 1000 or True Black HDR 400, but the Yoga Slim 7x's display outdoes the latter.

True Black HDR 600 is the second-best VESA certification that you can get with OLED screens, as you're getting 600 nits of brightness, all while maintaining infinite contrast and deep black levels. That's not to say that the AW3423DWF doesn't utilize its high-quality contrast while HDR 1000 is in use, but ABL (auto-brightness limiter) is far too aggressive, making gaming a frustrating experience in this mode.

Just look at those deep black levels... incredible. If you're on an OLED screen, that is. (Image credit: Future)

With the Slim 7x, True Black HDR 600 will make any of your games, movies, and shows look phenomenal - it's important to note, that I had to utilize the Windows HDR Calibration app (which can be found in the Microsoft Store) to adjust HDR as many of the colors can seem washed out when the mode is enabled and viewing HDR content. Once adjusted, it works like a charm, and I've managed to get some of my best viewing experiences ever with this display.

It's another reason for me to tell you yet again that once you upgrade to OLED, there's no going back - the deep black levels are phenomenal with the infinite contrast ratio, and unless you're reading this on a similar OLED panel, images won't do them any justice. I've never been one to notice the imperfections of regular LED displays until I decided to snap up Dell's Alienware OLED. I've also tested Asus's PG49WCD OLED ultrawide, and neither came close to my experience with the Yoga Slim 7x.

You also have the advantage of multiple color settings to switch between, thanks to the pre-installed X-Rite Color Assistant with P3, DCI-P3, Adobe RGB, sRGB, and Rec. 709 for SDR viewing (which is fantastic here). When using this, you'll need to disable HDR as X-Rite appears to be incompatible with it - this is relevant, as there was plenty of content I viewed that wasn't available in HDR.

While True Black HDR 1000 (which was recently announced at CES 2025) OLED displays will likely surpass the Yoga Slim 7x, it shouldn't be a reason to stop you from getting your hands on it.

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x: Battery

Beautiful keyboard... (Image credit: Future)

Battery tests were extremely positive at higher percentages - my first test was at 47% at full brightness with HDR enabled while multitasking with multiple YouTube videos playing, and it lasted approximately 42 minutes before the issue came into play.

My second test, had the battery at 80% with full brightness and HDR enabled, with the same level of activity, and it lasted for 2 hours and 34 minutes. These are fantastic results for a system that is put under strain at its maximum brightness level, but I've got even better news regarding my third test.

(Image credit: Future)

With my brightness levels set between 20 and 30 percent and HDR enabled while at 100% battery, the Yoga 7x took a full 2 hours and 8 minutes to start draining while multitasking. Yes, you read that right - it was at 100% battery for 2 hours. Putting the system under further stress with multiple videos at high resolutions running in the background and even a few benchmark tests, it took another 2 hours and 50 minutes to fall to 48% battery, lasting a total of 4 hours and 58 minutes without fully draining.

Now, barring the issue of the immediate battery drain (which I'm hoping was an isolated issue with my review unit), this is truly exceptional for those out for a laptop capable of lasting them throughout the day. I've always been one to opt for a system that allows me to forget that my charger exists, at least for multiple hours - the Yoga Slim 7x does just that when you're reasonable with brightness levels and the amount of strain you put on the laptop.

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x: Performance

Love me some Hades for sure... (Image credit: Future)

There was no way I was testing this beautiful laptop without attempting to game on it and see just how far I could go with its performance across several games. Well, at least I tried.

If you're contemplating a purchase of the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x with the intention of using it for gaming, this isn't the laptop for you. While it can perform well in some games like Hades (which left me quite impressed), its drivers leave several games crashing - some would crash on startup, and if they could make it past the menu screen, the frame rates were not acceptable.

A prime example of this was Capcom's Resident Evil 4 (you know you were going to see that at some point in this review), which would consistently crash on startup. Once using Qualcomm's upgraded graphics driver (which included GPU performance optimizations for several games), I made it past the main menu into the game - on the lowest preset at a 720p resolution, it could not push past 20 frames per second before eventually crashing again with a fatal D3D error, which points towards driver incompatibility.

(Image credit: Future)

On the bright side, though, Hades (while at the maximum 2944 x 1840 resolution) never once fell below 80 frames per second, even in the midst of intense combat. Where you'll run into issues when trying to game is with games that are somewhat demanding and that the X1E-78-100 processor can't handle at higher resolutions.

You may think that lowering the resolution will suffice in multiple games, but the screen has a 16:10 aspect ratio, which isn't great for resolutions like 1920x1080 or 2560x1440 (which are some of the only options in games).

Fortunately, performance in other areas provides a far more pleasant experience - multitasking is key for me when using any laptop, and the Slim 7x gave me zero issues when doing so. Thanks to the processor's 12 cores and 12 threads, keeping multiple tabs open hardly makes the system break a sweat (also making it essential for video editing and rendering).

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x Benchmark Tests

Here's how the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x performed in some of our benchmark tests and games:

Geekbench 6.3 CPU Bench: Single-core/2,236; Multi-core/11,784

Geekbench 6.3 GPU/OpenCL Bench: 19,839

Geekbench 6.3 GPU/Vulkan: 23,571

Cinebench 2024: Single-core/105; Multi-core/799

CrossMark: Overall: 1,294 ; Productivity: 1,109 ; Creativity: 1,577 ; Responsiveness: 1,137

Hades: Average 84fps

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x: Design

(Image credit: Future)

Considering the OLED display present here, the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x is a very thin laptop - as the name should suggest - while also being very lightweight, weighing only 1.28kg. There's also an incredible backlight keyboard at your disposal, and one of the standout features here was the caps lock - yes, I know, it sounds minor, but a simple key press will display whether caps lock is enabled or disabled on screen.

This eliminates any potential issues with caps lock when entering passwords (there are still some sites that won't let you show your password), which goes a long way when trying to stay productive.

It's a big shame that there are only three USB-C ports available on this system, which means you'll be forced to use a dock if you plan on using your USB-A drive, ethernet cable, or HDMI to connect to an external display. I suspect the omission of said ports is to adhere to keeping the Slim 7x thin, but I digress. The lack of even a 3.5mm headphone jack just feels absurd in a modern laptop.

(Image credit: Future)

The speakers here are underwhelming, but there's always got to be a compromise for a system that has so many positives - you do, however, have access to multiple sound presets through the Lenovo Vantage app so you can adjust the sound to adapt to your games or movies.

It's worth noting that this is a touchscreen display, but I never used this often throughout testing - touchscreen on a beautiful OLED display like this, just didn't seem appealing as I didn't want my fingerprint marks all over the screen, and it's not a 2-in-1 laptop (unlike some of the other Snapdragon laptops). What's great, though, is that there were little to no thermal issues even when there was a lack of room for ventilation, and it's safe to say that the Slim 7x satisfied me within its design region.

Should I buy the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x? Buy it if...

You want a fantastic display

The Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x has an outstanding OLED screen, with DisplayHDR True Black 600 providing exceptional viewing experiences.View Deal

You want a laptop that has a long-lasting battery

The Slim 7x truly can provide all-day battery life depending on your activity and screen brightness levels, keeping your charger stored away for a while.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You're looking for a laptop capable of gaming

While the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x runs well in some games that are less demanding, it certainly isn't built to handle most AAA games.View Deal

You prefer a 2-in-1 laptop

While the Slim 7x is a touchscreen laptop, it doesn't work as well as fellow 2-in-1 Snapdragon laptopsView Deal

How I tested the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x

I spent two weeks testing the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x, assessing its multitasking capabilities while also testing a variety of games. The Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E78100 excels at ensuring you get the best out of your activity, and this review unit included 16GB of RAM - 32GB may yield even greater results.

Some of the other games I tested included Street Fighter 6, Hitman: World of Assassination, Dragon's Dogma 2, and Tekken 8 to see just how far it could go with performance, but most of them would crash.

The issues with the instant battery drain prevented me from testing its battery life even further, but the results above indicate an incredible battery at reasonable settings.

Dyson Airwrap i.d: two-minute review

The Dyson Airwrap i.d. is the latest generation of the brand's ultra-popular multi-styler. Released in 2024, the i.d. introduces one significant upgrade on the original Airwrap: an i.d.curl switch that launches a curling sequence (wrap, curl, cool shot). This simple upgrade is an absolute game-changer – curling with the Airwrap i.d. feels effortless compared to other auto-wrap stylers I've tested, and the results hold far better, too. It's predictably expensive, but I truly think this is the best hair styler on the market right now.

In terms of design, it's the same tube-shaped dryer, onto which various styling tools can be attached. The main ones are the Airwrap barrels, which use the Coanda effect to attract hair, shaping it into a curl as it dries it, without the need for the extreme heat of traditional curling tongs. These are the ones that work with the i.d. curl feature – and to double-down on what I've said above, the whole thing is now extremely straightforward to use.

You don't need to mess around with finding the cool-shot button mid-curl, or take a guess over how long each bit of hair has been wrapped; you just flip the switch, drape a bit of hair over the wand, wiggle it about a bit, and the i.d. will do the rest for you. The timings of the curl sequence are based on information you supply in a companion app (another new development) about your hair type and styling aims. And while nothing has changed with regards to how the Coanda function works, I found my curls remained in place for far longer than they have done using other auto-wrap multi-stylers, purely because the process is automated for you here.

With the i.d., Dyson introduced a new tapering barrel alongside the parallel ones of previous models. As before, changing the direction of curl is as simple as twisting the knob at the top of the barrel – something even today's best Airwrap dupes don't yet offer.

The auto-wrap curlers are the main reason to buy an Airwrap, but for styling enthusiasts this styling tool comes with a plethora of compatible add-ons. There are enough drying attachments that mean it can rival today's best hair dryers, too, along with brushes for smoothing or volumizing hair. The variety of attachments on offer also open up the Airwrap to different hair types and lengths – there's a wide-tooth comb for coils, for instance. However, in terms of effectiveness, I can only really speak to my own experience (I have armpit-length, wavy hair).

Price-wise, the Airdrop i.d. is firmly a premium buy; in terms of design, usability and build quality, though, I can't fault it. If you're enthusiastic about styling, like to curl your hair often, and care about long-term hair health, the i.d. is worth the investment. That's the short version; read on for my full Airwrap i.d. review.

Dyson Airwrap i.d. review: price & availability

• List price: $599.99 / £479.99 / AU$849
• Launched: August 2024

Dyson products almost always sit in the premium end of the market, and the Airwrap i.d. is no exception. From Dyson direct, it has a list price of $599.99 in the US, £479.99 in the UK, and AU$849 in Australia. At time of writing, in the US and UK, you can choose between a "Straight+ Wavy" or "Curly+Coily" bundle, which comprise different attachments, but the pricing for both remains the same. In Australia, it's just the one standard bundle right now.

The Airwrap i.d. first launched in August 2024, a newer version of the Airwrap (read our Dyson Airwrap (2022) review for more on that model), which Dyson appears to be phasing out.

The i.d. certainly isn't cheap, and of course you're paying a bit of a premium for the Dyson name. However, there's nothing else quite like it on the market right now, and I can fault it for either build quality or attention to detail when it comes to the design.

You can pick up cheaper dupes, a few of which even arrive with feature auto-wrapping barrels. Of these, the Shark FlexStyle is perhaps the best regarded, and costs $279.99 / £269.99 / AU$499.99. In the US, you also have the Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 Multi-Styler at $269.99, while in the UK there's the Revamp Dynamic Radiance Pro Blow Dry 7-in-1 Ionic ​Air Styler at £179.99. The Airwrap i.d. is a clear step above all of these models for build quality and features, however – none can do clockwise and anti-clockwise curls on the same barrel, and none have an automated curl sequence.

Dyson isn't especially known for its discounts, but they do crop up from time to time, and are well worth taking advantage of if you do spot one.

• Value for money score: 3.5 out of 5

Dyson Airwrap i.d. specs Dyson Airwrap i.d review: design

• Tube-shaped dryer onto which styling accessories attach
• Auto-curl sequence button and companion app
• Extensive range of compatible attachments

The Airwrap i.d. is a tube-shaped hair dryer onto which various styling accessories can be attached. Primary among these are the Airwrap barrels, which use the Coanda effect to attract hair so it automatically wraps around the barrel and is shaped into curls as it dries. The attachments twist into place easily, and there's a lock switch on the rear of the dryer to release them when you want to swap in another one. I'll get more into the attachments themselves below.

Accessories attach to this top section, and lock into place (Image credit: Future)

On the dryer itself are three sliding buttons to control the settings. There are cleverly positioned near the top of the barrel, out of the way of your grip, but they're easily accessible during styling. Since they're sliding rather than press buttons, you have much less chance of accidentally changing settings as you hold the barrel, too.

Sliding buttons to control windspeed and temperature, and launch the curl sequence (Image credit: Future)

Two operate temperature (two heat options plus a cool shot) and windspeed (three options), but the third is probably the most interesting. This switches on the blower, but also operates the i.d. curl sequence, where there Airwrap will cycle through the settings required to create the perfect curl.

This function is new with the i.d., and works in conjunction with a companion app (see all the differences between the old and new models in my (Airwrap vs Airwrap i.d. comparison). Here, you complete a quiz about your hair type, length and styling goals, and the Airwrap will set its curl sequence settings based the information you've supplied.

On initial completion of the quiz, the Airwrap i.d. will remember your sequence, so you don't need your phone connected or with you to use the i.d. curl sequence. However, if you do have the app open, you can also see the progress of the sequence via a countdown graphic.

There's a removable filter cage (Image credit: Future)

At the base of the dryer is a grille, behind which sits the filter. You can remove the grille to keep the filter clean – Dyson recommends doing this regularly to keep the i.d. working as efficiently as possible.

Attachments

The Airwrap i.d. has an extensive range of compatible attachments; in fact, more extensive than any other multi-styler I've come across. Don't expect to get all of these with your styler – different attachments will be included with different bundles, and some are only available to purchase individually via Dyson's accessory store.

This tapering curl barrel is a new accessory option with the Airwrap i.d. (Image credit: Future)

The ones that the Airwrap first gained popularity for are the Airwrap barrels. These are curling barrels, but instead of heating up, they blast out directed air in such a way that the hair automatically wraps around them, shaping the hair into curls as the styler dries it. Dyson is the only brand (so far) that enables you to create clockwise and anti-clockwise curls using the same barrel. To switch direction, you twist the cool-touch knob at the top of the barrel.

The standard barrel is the same width all the way down, but with the i.d. Dyson has added a tapering barrel that creates curls that are tighter at the top and looser at the bottom.

The standard, same-width barrels are still included (Image credit: Future)

My review model was supplied with a couple of attachments geared towards use of the Airwrap as a hair dryer: the Fast dryer and Dryer+Flyaway smoother. One of the new dryer attachments introduced with the i.d. is the Blade Concentrator, but I didn't test this – and, as far as I can determine, it isn't included in any bundles right now. Bundles geared towards curly or coily hair will include a diffuser and wide-tooth comb.

There are various brush attachments in the range, some soft and some firm, and some for smoothing and some for volumizing, and in different sizes to suit different hair lengths. (I got a soft smoothing brush and large round volumizing brush included.)

My review model came with a storage / presentation box, but I'm not sure if this is included with every bundle, so check before you buy.

• Design score: 5 out of 5

Dyson Airwrap i.d. review: performance

• Comfortable and efficient to use as a dryer
• i.d. curl sequence is effortless and delivers long-lasting results
• Volumizing and smoothing brushes also work very well

As a dryer, the Airwrap i.d. works very well. It feels lightweight, well balanced, and it's comfortable to hold and easy to wield.

The Fast dryer attachment shifts the flow of air so it's at a right angle to the dryer, rather than shooting straight upwards. This means you can hold your arm in a natural and comfortable position. Some Airwrap-alikes have top sections that pivot to a right angle, for the same purpose. Dyson's attachment is more effective because it also widens the flow of air, and results in a noticeable boost in power.

On test, I found the Airwrap plus Fast dryer combo dried by armpit-length hair efficiently. It wasn't quite as speedy as a dedicated hair dryer such as the Dyson Supersonic Nural, but it's more powerful than other multi-stylers I've tested. (I've compared the Dyson Supersonic Nural vs Dyson Airwrap, if you're not sure which one you need.)

With the Fast dryer attachment on, the i.d. works effectively as a hair dryer (Image credit: Future) Curling

Before testing the Airwrap i.d., I thought the curl sequence might be a bit of a gimmick, but I've done a 180 on that view – I love it. It makes a massive difference to both the effort required to create curls and their staying power once you've finished styling.

Let's back up a bit. Setting up the i.d. curl sequence in the app is straightforward. You connect your Airwrap via Bluetooth by switching it on and holding it near your phone, then take a short quiz, which incorporates questions about your hair type, length, experience level and hair goals. Based on this information, the app will create your curl sequence settings.

This sequence includes wrapping, curling, and then a cool shot, timed to suit your hair type and needs. If you say you're a beginner, for example, you'll have longer to wrap your hair; if your curls tend to drop quickly, you'll get a longer cool shot. Note, though, that you can manually adjust the timings in the app at any time, if you find they don't suit you.

The app counts down each part of the curl sequence (Image credit: Future)

To launch the sequence, you flick the central button upwards, and then just get on with curling. If you're not used to this kind of curling, it will take some getting used to, but once you have it down it's easy. (I was shown how to use this by a Dyson-representative hairdresser, as shown in the photos here, but I also tested it out at home, and managed it just fine on my own.)

The i.d. curl switch takes the guesswork and fiddling about out of the equation. I've tested a few of these auto-wrap curlers now and there are two areas they prove most annoying. First, guesstimating the time you've been curling a particular section of hair – it takes longer than traditional tongs, in the region of 8-10 seconds per section – and second, locating and running the cool shot on each curl. The i.d. takes care of both.

The blower shapes the hair into curls as it dries it (Image credit: Future)

In terms of results, I was super impressed. However, I'll state upfront that curls created in this way generally tend to fall out far sooner than those created with traditional hot tongs (you'll need to decide if the benefits to hair health and less heat damage is worth it to you).

Nevertheless, my curls created with the i.d. lasted far longer than those created with competitor stylers. I think this is all down to the automation features: each section of hair is curled for the same length of time; I'm not forgetting or cutting short any cool shots.

Smoothing and volumizing

I also tested out the volumizing and smoothing brushes that came bundled with my Airwrap i.d. Both have been deigned well and I had no complaints about how they worked in use. They clip on easily and feel secure in use, and each has a stay-cool section that you can grip hold of for removal. While in terms of functionality there isn't anything particularly unique here, they work well and help boost the versatility of the multi-styler for those times you don't want a curly look.

• Performance score: 4.5 out of 5

Should you buy the Dyson Airwrap i.d.? Buy it if...

You curl regularly
Where the Airdrop i.d. shines is for creating curls. The i.d. curl sequence makes the process effortless, with the results more likely to outlast those where you're relying on guessing timings yourself.

You care about hair health
This type of curling is far better for your long-term hair health over regularly frying your locks with a curling wand.

You're a styling enthusiast
The Airwrap i.d. isn't cheap, but the quality of the tool and swappable accompanying attachments come into their own for those who love to create different styles. Of all the multi-stylers, the Airwrap probably features the widest range of compatible accessories.

Don't buy it if...

You don't often curl your hair
If you don't regularly curl your hair, there's much less of a performance gap between this and the many Airwrap dupes and multi-stylers on the market. If you're only creating blowout styles, for instance, you could save a lot of money by going for a dedicated brush dryer.

You're on a budget
There are dupes that will do a very similar job, albeit with lower build quality and more effort required from you.

How I tested the Dyson Airwrap i.d.

Before receiving my review model, I first got a demo of the Airwrap i.d. from a Dyson representative in a salon. I then used the styler over a few weeks at home, testing out the curling system extensively, and using the other attachments too. I compared my experience to other alternatives I've tested, in terms of quality, usability, and how long the styles lasted.

Read more about how we test

• First reviewed March 2025

Black Mirror season 7 is here, and I'm looking forward to seeing everyone's thoughts on one of the best Netflix shows now that they've got six more episodes to explore. It may come as no surprise that it's a real mixed bag.

With anthologies, disliking certain installments more than others is par for the course, but after watching all of season 7 I really am worried it's ran out of ideas. Out of the six episodes, one is a sequel, another is set in the same universe as Bandersnatch, and another has similar narrative beats to San Junipero.

So only having three episodes with truly unique ideas is a bit concerning considering Black Mirror was known for having distinctly different stories, especially in its original Channel 4 era.

Yes, we often see Easter eggs hidden, which connect them like references to past episodes or the same news channel, but they've never felt completely repetitive until now.

In my Black Mirror season 7 episode ranking, I placed USS Callister: Into Infinity at the bottom because I'm frustrated it even exists. The original episode from season 4 was so wonderfully unique and had a bittersweet ending, and I would've been happy for it to just end there. Making a sequel just because the first episode is popular is frustrating, and they could've come up with something new.

But, as I said, it's a mixed bag and that means there were episodes I enjoyed very much. My top two Black Mirror season 7 episodes are Common People and Hotel Reverie, because, in my opinion, they really go back to basics and look at what the show is most loved for: criticizing the misuse of tech and how it can really mess with people's emotions, not to mention their physical and mental health.

Both of these episodes are also very relevant. Through Common People, Charlie Brooker explores what would happen if you could magically restore your sick partner through a revolutionary healthcare plan.

Don't worry; it's only a small monthly cost, and it's one that Chris O’Dowd's character decides to sign up for to save his beloved wife, played by Rashida Jones.

That's all well and good until they start running intrusive ads through your partner and you can't get rid of these until you give the company more money, in a cut-throat examination on our over reliance of subscription services and their multiple tiers and add-ons.

Yeah, this one really hurts, guys. That's why it's brilliant; it packs that emotional punch that reminds me of earlier episodes like Be Right Back in season 2.

(Image credit: Netflix)

Hotel Reverie is also timely as it focuses on our growing interest in AI, through a company that can revamp old Hollywood movies by uploading a modern day actor to spice things up for the streaming age. A controversial choice, of course, but an essential one for a struggling studio who can no longer profit of their struggling classic cinema library.

As well as opening up discussions around cinema, it taps into this idea that an AI character could become self aware. Issa Rae and Emma Corrin shine as two actresses from very different generations who meet inside this movie, forming a bond that goes beyond the pages of a pre-written script. I adored this one and I'll no doubt revisit it soon.

When Black Mirror keeps things fresh and original, it's a very thought-provoking watch. Even though I enjoyed the divisive Plaything episode more than some others, I can see people's arguments that it felt rushed and the ending wasn't as satisfying, and I think many of us did expect more from a Bandersnatch spin-off, especially with someone as big as Peter Capaldi at the helm.

My three-star rating does reflect how on the fence I feel about the series right now. I did like this season aside from USS Callister: Into Infinity's long, drawn out runtime, especially how emotionally driven it was, but I really don't know where they're going to go from here.

With Charlie Brooker telling The Hollywood Reporter he's "in it for the long haul", I'm concerned about what that's going to look like. Sometimes, it's good to quit while you're ahead.

You might also like

• Netflix movies and shows are now available in over 30 languages – here's what you need to know
• David Fincher is making a Once Upon A Time in Hollywood sequel for Netflix with Brad Pitt set to return
• 5 new Netflix movies and shows I'll be streaming in April 2025

Alienware AW3425DWM 34-inch: Two-minute review

The Alienware AW3425DWM 34-inch isn’t the first 2K 34-inch ultrawide monitor on the market, nor is it the cheapest, but in my opinion, it's one of the most mastered. Sporting a discreet design and a slew of features I’d consider essential, the AW3425DWM offers great darkness and coloring at a respectable price.

Stripping out RGB and only offering two USB-A ports for accessory connectivity (but lacking USB-C), and not including price-bouncing OLED panel tech, I’ve never been more impressed with an ultrawide monitor than with the AW3425DWM. I've experienced the more expensive AW3423DWF, Alienware's nearly ultrawide OLED monitor (second to the AW3423DW), and I fell in love with it for its picture quality and clarity, but the AW3425DWM is a much more impressive beast for its value prospect.

Its specs are ahead of many of its close competitors, particularly ones from LG and Samsung, which explains its slightly higher cost in this segment. This includes a greater maximum brightness and color gamut, along with the inclusion of the aforementioned accessory ports.

(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)

The monitor doubles as both a handy gaming display and a useful productivity tool. I’ve enjoyed playing games with support for the ultrawide layout, in particular the graphically intense Assassin’s Creed Shadows and Forza Motorsport, but its handling of darkness has also been very satisfying in these games and other titles without ultrawide support, such as viral sensation R.E.P.O.

The wide screen also gives ample room for having multiple windows open. During my testing, I regularly had a YouTube video playing on the left half of the screen and a game on the right, and I personally preferred this to having a dual-monitor setup.

All of this said, be ready for the odd application that lacks ultrawide support. I encountered plenty of games and programs that didn't take full advantage of this layout (usually black bars will fill the space, while the program takes on a 16:9 aspect ratio). This may not be a huge issue to all users, but it's best to be aware of this extra hurdle when owning an ultrawide.

Picture quality is also heavily dependent on your viewing position, so be confident that a curved ultrawide is what you really want before making a purchase. Although I loved the immersive nature of a curved monitor this big, I wish it was more forgiving when viewing from an angle, as I'd often put a show on while doing something else away from my desk in the room.

Finally – and this will likely be a non-issue for many users – but the display doesn’t come with in-built speakers. I like having in-built speakers for when I don’t want to wear my headphones (and I don’t want to buy separate speakers), but I understand other users will have their own preferences when it comes to audio and external sound systems.

In my opinion, the quality of display you get for the price you pay is considerable, and even though it may not be as feature-rich as more expensive models, the AW3425DWM stands out from the pack as a mid-range curved and ultrawide gaming monitor.

Alienware AW3425DWM 34-inch review: pricing and availability

(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)

• How much does it cost? $369.99 / £369 / AU$749
• When is it available? Available now
• Where can you get it? Directly from Dell and retailers in the US, UK and Australia

The Alienware AW2425DWM is an upper mid-range gaming monitor, which will set you back $369.99 / £369 / AU$749, and sports the niche curved and ultrawide layout. Offering a 2K resolution and a brightness of up to 400 nits, it’s slightly more premium than its main competitors.

Alienware has stripped out excessive USB ports and RGB lighting to bring costs down, but the beast remains closely in line with its higher-end curved and ultrawide siblings. It offers a flat base and an easy-to-navigate user interface, along with an IPS-VA panel. More expensive models tend to come with an OLED panel and 4K resolution, along with greater brightness and contrast.

When we’re looking at competitors, the closest is likely to be the Samsung Odyssey 34-inch ultrawide gaming monitor, available for $399 / £329 / AU$599 (though often found much cheaper today).

• Value score: 4.5/5

Alienware AW3425DWM 34-inch: specs Alienware AW3425DWM 34-inch review: design

(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)

• Understated design
• Discreet stand with small footprint
• 178º viewing angle

The Alienware AW3425DWM is fairly understated. Its stand and bezels are completely unassuming, without any RGB or detailing to speak of. The back of the display is pretty standard, apart from the classic extraterrestrial logo, and the only bit of styling on the front is the spelled out Alienware name.

There’s not a lot for me to criticize here – it’s not a monitor built to win design competitions, but in my opinion it's a fairly nice looking display. It has a handy passthrough hole in its stand for neatly organizing your cables, which I found particularly useful for my additional mouse and keyboard cables, and the ports are well laid out across the back of the monitor, with USB-A ports along the underside for easy access. It does, however, lack USB-C ports which, in 2025, I consider disappointing as more peripherals have adopted it as standard.

The design aspect that impressed me the most was its satisfyingly small footprint. Although it's quite a large display, it stands firmly on a single flat foot without much wobble if you bump the desk.

The display has full tilt, swivel and height adjustment with its stand, and the screen is VESA-mount compatible. As it's an ultrawide, you can't rotate the display fully vertical, and if you want to pull this off, you'll need to mount it seperate from the stand. The curvature of the screen has a 178º viewing angle, enveloping your vision well if you’re seated directly in front of it.

That means it'll be difficult to watch content on the monitor when viewing it from outside the optimal viewing space. I would often get up from my desk and do something away from it while looking over at a show or livestream on the display, and would find it difficult to view because of the curvature. This isn't a complaint, but an observation and a known limitation of curved screens.

For interacting with the onboard user interface, there’s a joystick nub directly under the middle of the display, handy for quick adjustments when switching from, say, gaming to productivity as I’d often do.

• Design score: 5/5

Alienware AW3425DWM 34-inch review: features

(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)

• Ultrawide 2K resolution
• AMD FreeSync Premium and VESA AdaptiveSync certification
• Two USB-A passthrough ports

I love the Alienware AW3425DWM because it’s so stripped back and accessible. It lacks the features of its more pricey OLED-toting sibling, the AW3423DWF, or the range-topping AW3423DW, but a more budget-minded gamer would likely prefer the display for how cheap it is.

Although I'm an OLED panel lover, I don't mind the IPS VA panel fitted to this monitor. It handles darkness well and although an OLED would offer improved contrast, I found games where shadows are particularly important (such as Assassin’s Creed Shadows) maintained enough detail to still be able to see what was going on. Aiding the darkness is a 95% color gamut and a 3000:1 contrast ratio, resulting in a nice-looking picture that I found adequate.

I found the 2K resolution scaled for the wide panel (3440 x 1440, 21:9) sufficiently satisfying for making my games look big and expansive, and when I switched to competitive games like Marvel Rivals, I didn't feel like I needed a faster response time than the 1ms rate offered by the monitor. The same goes for the 180Hz refresh rate – I rarely played games that offered framerates up to this number, but it remains a good figure for a wide variety of users.

The monitor's quick settings allow you to switch up the display to your preference, such as scaling picture or HDR settings, which I often did when changing tasks. Additionally, running a USB-B to USB-A cord between the monitor and your PC will allow you to use the fitted USB-A ports for passthrough, a feature I really like for cutting down on cable clutter (though, again, no USB-C ports).

Being an ultrawide, there’s an additional utility in being able to treat it as if it’s two monitors without feeling claustrophobic. Any monitor can be used to display multiple windows, but an ultrawide has the benefit of being able to do so without making you feel too cramped, in my opinion. This was particularly useful when having two windows open (such as a browser or word processor on the left and a YouTube video on the right), but I found it also performed well when having four windows open at once.

• Features score: 4.5/5

Alienware AW3425DWM review: performance

(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)

• Great darkness and color clarity
• Maximum refresh rate of up to 180Hz
• Brightness of up to 400 nits

The Alienware AW3425DWM is a well-performing gaming monitor that displays objects and coloring without fault. More impressive ultrawide monitors are widely available, but in my opinion, you’re unlikely to get better specs than what is on offer here in the 2K 34-inch ultrawide segment.

Only operating at up to 2K and offering fairly mid-range brightness and contrast have made the monitor cheaper, but consequently sparse on the performance front. That being said, I found this to be a perfectly fine monitor for casual and competitive gamers alike, and it's is in line for the mid-range segment.

The 180Hz maximum refresh rate isn’t the highest (higher-end Alienware panels can go up to 240Hz), nor the 1ms response rate the fastest (in an age where it’s as low as 0.1ms on some panels), but I think the savings on offer make it worth considering for many PC users.

That said, a maximum brightness of only 400 nits, though above many competitors in this segment, may be too low for some users. All of the games I tested looked great and text appeared fine without any haziness, but in use you may crave a brighter display.

Streaming content also looks great despite mid-range brightness, with the vibrancy of movies like Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse presented well. Additionally, there’s an anti-glare coating across the glass, perfect for blocking out annoying light sources.

If you want your gaming monitor to serve up higher brightness and greater contrast, likely facilitated by an OLED panel, I highly recommend reading our hands-on with the Alienware AW3423DWF. I've personally tried that monitor myself and found it to be massively impressive, but the AW3425DWM is generally a better deal, especially if you don't really care about having a 4K resolution.

The only issue I had was when I took it out of the box: the monitor automatically kept adjusting brightness (dimming in my case) based on how the image appeared, but this was quickly resolved by tweaking picture settings to my liking.

• Performance: 4/5

Should I buy the Alienware AW3425DWM? Buy it if...

You want a curved ultrawide monitor

This is one of the more impressive curved and ultrawide monitors in the mid-range segment, and would be a satisfying buy if greater width is something you desire.

You want a big screen without spending too much

34-inch displays are getting cheaper and cheaper, and while you can get an identically sized monitor from a competitor, Alienware’s option beats out its rivals on brightness and features.

Don't buy it if...

You crave the best of the best

This monitor doesn’t display the brightest image, nor does it offer 4K or an OLED panel.

You want a small panel

Ultrawide monitors are never small and this display will take up valuable space on your desk.

Also consider

Alienware AW3423DWF

More expensive and feature-packed, the AW3423DWF is the monitor to buy if you want a noticeable performance bump above what the AW3425DWM can offer. While we haven't fully tested it ourselves, our colleagues at GamesRadar+ give it a full five stars.

AOC CU34G2XP

This is the newest version of our favourite budget ultrawide display, the CU354G2X, it packs similar specs to the Alienware AW3425DWM at a much lower price and could be worth considering. We haven't had the opportunity to try it out for ourselves here at TechRadar, so I can't comment on its performance, but the price might just tip the scales for some users.

Samsung 34-inch Odyssey G55T G5 ultrawide

The Samsung Odyssey G55T can often be found much cheaper these days, making it a worthwhile second choice to the AW3425DWM. Again, I can't speak for its performance as we've not had the opportunity to review it on TechRadar, but savings are always tempting.

How I tested the Alienware AW3425DWM

• Tested for three weeks
• Primarily used for gaming
• Also used for productivity as a single monitor

I tested the Alienware AW3425DWM over the course of two weeks, most of which was spent gaming, playing Assassin’s Creed Shadows primarily, but also R.E.P.O, Forza Motorsport, Nubby’s Number Factory, Marvel Rivals and Balatro.

I also spent a fair amount of time using the display for productivity purposes, such as typing out word documents and browsing the web, along with watching things on streaming services, primarily YouTube and Twitch. I constantly switched up the settings and used a DisplayPort connection.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed April 2025

In puzzle roguelike game Blue Prince, you play as a young boy named Simon who has inherited his great uncle’s estate. However, Simon’s inheritance is predicated on the notion that he’ll discover the fabled Room 46 – the very existence of which is doubted by others. What follows is a surreal adventure like no other, one that’s filled with mystery not just because of how the environments are designed, but also due to all the cryptic notes and hidden secrets that you discover along the way.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PC
Available on: PS5, Xbox Series X|S, PC
Release date: April 10, 2025

The gargantuan manor that you find yourself in has a 9x5 grid-like layout – nine rows and five columns – and you have to place rooms in each slot. You might think that the best way to do this is to just plop down hallways with straightforward connections to the Antechamber to the north, but that’s not the case.

That’s because Blue Prince uses concepts similar to deck-building games except, instead of cards, you draw from a set of three rooms, each with its own pathways and unique effects. Some have items or documents lying around, while others cause debilitating penalties or lead to dead ends. Because draws are randomized, you’ll never know what you’ll get. You could have a decent run where you make it halfway through the mansion, only for the next set to contain rooms with no exits. That, or the rooms themselves are locked or they require you to find gem resources first.

Instead of health, you have steps in Blue Prince, which can be replenished by entering bedrooms or eating food lying around. If you run out of steps, the day ends. You’ll have to start back at the Entrance Hall as room slots and items are reset.

(Image credit: Dogubomb) The architect of rogues

Within the first few hours of playing Blue Prince, I was already engrossed. While it’s a game in which I can feel like an architect, placing down rooms wherever I want, there’s also a deep strategic layer to it. Numerous thoughts crossed my mind each time I ventured into the manor.

For instance, before placing a Walk-In Closet, I debated if this dead-end room was worth it – sure, it had four items, but I’d block off that section rather than having an open pathway. Conversely, whenever I drew a Hallway – which has three exits – I wondered if I should be using it so soon or if I should save it for later when I really needed it.

This strategic layer also coincides with the aforementioned steps mechanic. If my placement of rooms isn’t optimal, I could end up backtracking so often that I’d waste dozens of steps just to get from Point A to Point B.

There was even one moment when I debated where I should place the Foundation, a room that has an elevator that leads to the underground section of the manor. Unlike most other options, the Foundation’s placement does not reset each day/run. Since I needed it to progress further, I decided to plop it down next to the Entrance Hall for easy access. Had I drafted it closer to the end, that would’ve meant relying heavily on randomness (and the RNG gods) just so I could make a path to it.

Randomness is even more impactful in the game – at one point, I was so close to Room 46, only to draw room cards that didn’t have connections to the only open doorway. In another attempt, I was planning to open a locked deposit box in the Vault, but the key never appeared in any of the areas I checked. These instances were frustrating, of course, but it’s par for the course in roguelite titles. The challenge itself makes achieving the goal even more rewarding.

(Image credit: Dogubomb) Perplexing puzzle perfection

Blue Prince encourages you to plan your attempts carefully and, while you’re at it, you’re bound to stumble upon puzzles that are meant to stymie you. Some even gradually become more difficult the more you complete them in successive runs.

For example, a math-based Darts Puzzle involves looking at the colors on the board and performing algebraic operations – i.e. addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. Little did I know that dozens of successful completions would cause migraine-inducing equations that involved exponents, fractions, negative numbers, and symbols that I’d never seen in my life. Thankfully, I found a means of upgrading rooms with perks, and I was able to revert the Darts Puzzle to simple addition. I’m terrible at math anyway.

Best bit

(Image credit: Dogubomb)

Several hours after I started playing Blue Prince, I finally figured out why each room had an odd pairing of paintings. I then deciphered the hidden message, a 44-character phrase representing 44 rooms I placed around the mansion, and I exclaimed out loud. No, I didn’t receive a material reward. My reward was a subtle hint that helped me solve another puzzle. I felt like a genius.

There are also puzzles that go hand-in-hand with exploration, such as the Chess Puzzle. You see, there are certain rooms that have chess pieces, like the pawn, rook, queen, and king. To solve the Chess Puzzle, I had to remember where I placed those rooms on the manor’s grid-like layout, and then I had to move the corresponding pieces on the chessboard based on their locations. Oh, and the chess board itself was in a distant section of the estate, too, which meant I had to carefully retrace my steps just to arrive at the correct chamber.

Other brain teasers are equally perplexing. For those who’ve read Maze: Solve the World’s Most Challenging Puzzle – a book that helped inspire Blue Prince – you’ll be glad to know that the author, Christopher Manson, actually designed the Gallery Puzzle. It has four abstract paintings, and you have to choose one word that best represents each illustration. Speaking of illustrations, there are pairs of paintings in every room. At first glance, you might think they’re just there for design purposes until you realize that they’re part of an elaborate puzzle, too.

All in all, the puzzles in Blue Prince are nothing short of outstanding. That unique spark of creativity is showcased, as what starts out as little hints and clues transform into bigger arcs and intricately woven threads that I was eager to follow. Even the unremarkable tidbits might be part of a broader and stranger enigma. No pattern, item, or fixture is there by accident; everything has a purpose.

(Image credit: Dogubomb) C’mon gang, we’ve got a mystery to solve

Blue Prince astonishingly goes beyond traditional puzzle rooms and objectives-based tasks as the story slowly unfolds. Simon is the only person in the estate, but the rest of the narrative, including background information on other characters, is all told by way of documents, notes, books, and, in some cases, emails.

There’s an arc about someone being blackmailed, which then led me to several red envelopes stashed within safes (and, of course, I had to figure out the passcodes). There’s another about a missing author, with hints that are found in plain sight, albeit inconspicuous at first glance. At one point, I even had to browse several books to find a visual cue, piecing together a hidden message, which then allowed me to find an item in a specific spot even though there was no icon telling me that something was there.

It’s this facet that truly sunk its claws into me, pulling me further down the rabbit hole well past my arrival in Room 46. The story developed and unraveled organically the more hints I came across. There were riddles upon riddles and secrets within secrets, that I was finding new things hours later in areas that I’ve frequented numerous times.

Perhaps my only complaint is that the game does not have an in-game journal. Even if you’ve already read a letter, there’s no system that keeps track of the information in-game. You have no other choice but to take a screenshot, jot down notes, or hope that you can draft the room again in the future. In fact, as of the time of this writing, my Blue Prince screenshots folder has well over 3,000 images already, all organized per room and theme. This was hard to manage even for me – and I write guides for a living – and I’m sure it will be problematic for those who don’t commit too many details to memory.

Even with this qualm, Blue Prince still remains a spectacular offering from developer Dogubomb. What I said before about the Antechamber and Room 46 are just your initial goals. The biggest surprise in this game is the fact that traditional progression is just the tip of a continent-sized iceberg.

Fair warning: Blue Prince will occupy every waking moment of your life just like it did mine. You won’t be saying good night to this sweet prince anytime soon. It’s that damn good.

Should you play Blue Prince? Play it if...

You enjoy puzzle games and roguelike elements
Blue Prince has countless puzzles that are meant to confuse you, though you’ll feel like a genius once you’ve solved them. Roguelike elements also enhance the strategic depth.

You love taking down notes and looking for secrets
There are numerous notes and documents, many of which are part of the secrets that you should discover.

Don't play it if...

You’re looking for a lot of hand-holding
Outside of a few documents explaining basic mechanics, you’re left to your own devices and you have to figure out what you need to do next.

You dislike roguelike mechanics and randomization
A lot of facets of the game are randomized, especially item placements and room selection pools. Things can get frustrating if you run out of steps or you don’t get the items or rooms that you need.

Accessibility

Sadly, Blue Prince features no accessibility features whatsoever. Let alone specific features like colorblind modes, the game doesn't even allow you to alter subtitles in any way or even customize controls. A disappointing element of such an otherwise fantastic game.

(Image credit: Dogubomb) How I reviewed Blue Prince

I played Blue Prince on a TCL P755 TV at 4K resolution and maximum settings. My gaming PC has an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 GPU, Intel Core i9-10900K CPU, and 32GB of RAM. I used a Razer Viper Mini mouse and a locally-made keyboard, as well as a Logitech F710 wireless controller.

My progress as of the time of publishing this review is around 70 hours across a week or so of playing. I was able to reach Room 46 several times, as well as explore various locations in, out, and under the manor, all to discover numerous secrets along the way.

First reviewed April 2025

Specs

Type: mono laser printer

Functions: Print only

Connectivity: Ethernet, USB, Wi-Fi

Data storage slots: none

Max print speed: 29ppm

Max paper size: Letter/A4

Print quality: 600 x 600 dpi

Memory: 64 MB

Apple AirPrint: yes

Consumables included: Black cartridge (700 pages)

Dimensions/Weight: 355 x 279 x 205 mm (WxDxH)/12.3lb/5.6kg

The HP LaserJet M209dw is an affordable and remarkably compact mono laser printer aimed at small business and the micro office. It’s a simple print-only device, but it comes with key features such as auto-duplex printing, dual-band Wi-Fi, Wolf Security and fax functionality that add up to something that would do well in shared office.

HP reckons it can handle a duty cycle of up to 2,000 pages per month. Being a LaserJet, rather than an inkjet, I already know it’ll always be ready to print without fear of blocked nozzles, and the total cost of ownership looks very competitive.

However, I was curious how it would compare to the best home printers and the best small business printers I've reviewed. After all, with only one paper input, however, and not much inbox toner, it still needs to justify its $149 price tag, so let’s delve deeper.

HP LaserJet M209dw: Design and build

(Image credit: HP)

HP often leads the way when it comes to printer design and innovation and the LaserJet M209dw is a good example. It’s significantly smaller than the similarly priced Brother HL-L2865DW in every dimension and with its paper tray folded away, it fits into my desk drawer. In operation, though, you’ll need to keep the paper cassette in place so it takes up a bit more desk space than those dimensions suggest.

There’s no scanner, no touchscreen display and just one paper input, so it’s a minimal and clean aesthetic. The buttons are on top while a stripe of vivid LED light across the front panel lets you know when the printer is on and connected to the Wi-Fi. It changes from violet to blue when it’s online.

The paper input tray feels rather insubstantial and comes unclipped a bit too easily. On the plus side, this forward-facing flap makes it easy to load 150 sheets of paper and switch paper stock quickly. It’ll take any paper size from 4x6 photo paper to A4 or legal. With no additional multi-purpose input tray it’s something I had to do a lot during the test.

HP LaserJet M209dw: Features & specifications

(Image credit: HP)

Being a budget print-only device, the HP LaserJet M209dw isn't likely to top my round-up of best HP printers any time soon. It has few features to mention. You do have, what I consider the essentials for a business printer; auto-duplex, dual-band Wi-Fi, Ethernet and USB ports and some security software to prevent attacks over the network. But it also has Bluetooth to make the setup procedure easier, and if you use the HP Smart software, you add a fax facility and the ability to print remotely via the cloud.

It’s a pity there’s no multi-purpose tray for those one-off jobs such as printing on headed paper and a display of some sort would have been nice. For such a small printer that’s regularly discounted to below the one hundred dollar price point, I can’t complain too much.

The quoted maximum print speed of 29ppm (pages per minute) in simplex draft mode is not too shabby, and there’s room for 150 sheets of paper in the input tray. The output tray can hold 100 sheets. There’s no USB Host port at the front, but you do have Ethernet and USB ports at the rear. Print quality is given as the standard 600x600dpi and there’s 64GB of inbuilt memory, which is less than most new printers, but it didn’t prove to be a problem during the test.

HP LaserJet M209dw: Setup and operation

(Image credit: HP)

With Bluetooth built in and a good companion app called HP Smart, the HP LaserJet M209dw is especially easy to set up. The starter cartridge is already installed, so all you need to do is load some plain paper, turn on and follow the instructions on your smartphone. You’ll see your new printer appear on the app because it can make a Bluetooth connection right away and then help you to join your local Wi-Fi network.

OK, so it didn’t actually work first time for me, but after turning things off and on again, I managed to get the printer online eventually. I’m sure this had more to do with the capricious nature of Wi-Fi than HP’s streamlined setup procedure.

A touchscreen interface would have made the HP LaserJet M209dw easier to operate, but a simple print-only device like this doesn’t really need one. The forward-facing paper tray is conveniently located for switching media and the button controls are intuitive enough.

HP LaserJet M209dw: Performance

(Image credit: HP)

The HP LaserJet M209dw printed clearly and reliably throughout the test, with no misprints or paper jams. It did especially well with black text on plain paper, which appeared consistently crisp and legible down to the smallest point size. Printing in draft mode produced only slightly paler print that would be fine for most circumstances.

This isn’t the fastest laser printer on the block. Its top speed of 29ppm is slower than that of the Brother HL-L2865DW, but it’ll still beat any inkjet and it flips the paper in auto-duplex mode quite quickly. The first page out time is given as 7.6 seconds, but this depends on so many factors as to make it a not very useful parameter. More significant is the 30-second warm up time, which is rather slow.

The HP LaserJet M209dw is not so good at printing graphics and photos. Both appear too dark and with poor contrast, as you can see in the photo comparison where a Xerox printer shows how the lion should look.

HP LaserJet M209dw: Consumables

(Image credit: HP)

The HP LaserJet M209dw will take a high yield black toner cartridge (135X) costing around US$130 (£83), which gives a reasonable page rate, that’s just a little higher than the aforementioned Brother HL-L2460DW.

It’s significantly more expensive to run than an ink tank inkjet like the Epson EcoTank ET-M2140, but much cheaper than any cartridge inkjet. I should warn you that there’s not much toner in the starter cartridge that comes with this printer. Barely enough for 700 pages.

HP LaserJet M209dw: Maintenance

(Image credit: HP)

Usually, the only component of any of the best laser printers that you need to replace is the imaging drum, but in this case the drum is integrated into the cartridge, so you’re replacing it every time you change cartridges. Unlike inkjets, which need to run a maintenance cycle every so often, the only thing to think about here is stopping an excess of dust from penetrating the printer.

HP LaserJet M209dw: Final verdict

(Image credit: HP)

The HP LaserJet M209dw is so small and effective and reasonably priced that it’s hard not to like.

Home users will appreciate the prompt and precise pages of text that this black and white printer can turn out and the Bluetooth-enabled setup procedure, while business users in a small shared office will welcome HP’s Wolf Security protection and dual-band Wi-Fi.

I would like to have seen an additional multi-purpose input tray, as the solitary 150-sheet input is limiting. And while text looks sharp, graphics generally appear too dark and lacking in contrast. The amount of toner in the setup cartridge (enough for 700 pages) is also a bit stingy, but those niggles are all explained by the low price and conveniently compact size of this neat laser printer.

Image 1 of 5

(Image credit: HP)Image 2 of 5

(Image credit: HP)Image 3 of 5

(Image credit: HP)Image 4 of 5

(Image credit: HP)Image 5 of 5

(Image credit: HP)

For more budget models, I've reviewed the best cheap printers around.

• ^ Back to top

The Apple Mac Studio made a huge splash when it entered the market a few years back. The form factor with that kind of power was nearly too good to be true. Now, the best mini PC manufacturers are replicating that style of desktop powerhouse.

The Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra is an excellent example of that. Lenovo took the exact size of the popular Mac Studio and threw their machine into it, claiming it was the business version of a Mac Studio.

For the most part, it has excellent ports, an option for up to 8 displays, beats out the Mac Studio, an RTX 4060 GPU, and even a discrete AI NPU. But can this machine match the performance ability of the Mac Studio at its best?

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra: Price and Availability

The Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra starts at around $3,000 but's frequently discounted to under $2,000. If you spec this thing out, you can run over $5,000. The Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra is available for purchase through Lenovo.com and enterprise partners, so if you are looking to pick this up, I'd check first at Lenovo to snag one of those great deals on this machine.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra: Unboxing & first impressions

The Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra is nearly the exact dimensions of the Apple Mac Studio. It comes in a compact box with the cable and paperwork you'd expect. Unlike the popular silver on Macs, the ThinkCentre Neo Ultra comes in a Luna Gray chassis that looks more like what I'd expect a Lenovo device to look like.

Much like other compact desktops, the ThinkCentre Neo Ultra would fit easily under a monitor, even if not on a monitor arm, or if you wanted to, you could tuck it off to the side, keep it front and center to show off or mount it behind the monitor or under the desk.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra: Design & build quality Specs

CPU: Up to Intel Core i9-14900 vPro
GPU: NVIDIA RTX 4060 8GB
RAM: Up to 64GB DDR5
Storage: Up to 2x 2TB M.2 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Ports:
1x USB-C 20Gbps, 1x 3.5mm combo jack, 2x USB-A 5Gbps, 4x USB-A 10Gbps, 2x HDMI 2.1, 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, 2.5GbE LAN
Optional: Configurable punch-out ports (HDMI, VGA, USB-C, LAN, etc.)
Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3
Dimensions: 7.68” x 7.52” x 4.25” (3.6L), 7.7 lbs

The Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra is a very professional and simple-looking machine. Lenovo has done a great job at making this a machine that does not stand out, is not overly flashy, but looks professional and top-tier at the same time. It's got a solid frame with rounded off edges, but not so much so that it looks round, more just not sharp. The top panel looks like it's the roof to a building with a row of windows, leaving plenty of room for ventilation to keep this powerhouse from overheating.

For those who like being able to upgrade RAM and SSD on their own, it’s great to see that the bottom panel can easily be removed. This is something that I see less and less in computers in general. But it’s a vital component for some users.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future) Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra: In use

I work predominantly from a laptop. It has always appealed to me to have a single computer that I can easily take from place to place. However, having used this computer in my rotation of devices for the last several weeks, I can say there is something fantastic about a desktop that is set up, ready to rock, no dock needed, no charge needed, plugged into multiple displays, set up when you’re ready—a kind of desk setup.

As you can see in the desk shots, I usually have this on a single monitor setup. However, I ran five displays on this at one time simply because that was the number I had with me at the time of testing. I can confidently say that this is an excellent desktop if you are working primarily on business tasks and want to use multiple displays.

There is no need for an external graphics card or a dock with DisplayLink like I need with my M2 Series MacBook Pro, and there are no issues when running different types of monitors, as I have seen questions about. I was running a 49-inch ultrawide, a 32-inch, a 27-inch, a portable monitor, and a TV, all without any issues.

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

During my testing, I used this display for a few virtual meetings, a lot of writing and admin work, some basic photo editing, some video rendering, a lot (40+) of heavy Chrome Tabs (multiple extensive project management tools), Slack, Asana, Jira, Basecamp, ZenDesk, Hubspot, Postman, VS Code, WhatsApp, Email, and more. I worked on some web design, system automation, large Google Docs with 40+ pages of 11pt font and many comments, and so on. I tried to crash this computer, which handled everything while easily outputting to an abundance of screen real estate.

I wouldn’t use this machine for heavy video editing because I don’t think it's one of the best video editing computers available, but it is one of the best business computers in this form-factor, ideal for administrative or more standard business tasks like project management, documents, emails, virtual meetings, and so on.

After testing, I also see a lot of advantages to using this if you're a project manager or supervisor. It would allow for ample displays to show everything that kind of role needs to see all at once, without compromise.

Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra: Final verdict

The ThinkCentre Neo Ultra is a powerhouse of a machine. I’d still choose a Mac Studio for creative tasks, but this machine is a genuine contender for classic business performance. It’s got better video outputs, is just as compact, and has leading enterprise security and great software.

For business professionals, developer teams, or even things like conference rooms, command centers, or other setups that need a lot of screens, this machine is a fantastic one to consider. Just know that it doesn’t have Thunderbolt, so file transfers will be quite a bit slower than on something that does support a version of Thunderbolt.

For extra power, we reviewed the best workstations you can get right now.

Apple Solo Loop review

If you ever get fed up with fastening up your Apple Watch every morning, the Apple Solo Loop is sure to liberate you from frustration. The Apple Solo Loop is as simple as it gets – a plain Apple Watch strap that slips straight onto your wrist – no buttons, buckles or the like to contend with here. And although it’s not quite the perfect strap, it’s still a favorite of mine – here’s why.

Firstly, the absence of any fastening features is a big time saver. Sure, that means this watch is non-adjustable – not ideal if you’re sharing your Apple Watch with another person, for instance, but the ability to just slip it on was a plus for me overall. Simply check out Apple’s size guide on its website and find the fit that works for you. Easy as you like.

I tried out the Size 6 edition and found it to be both snug and secure – just as all the best Apple Watch bands should be. But there were more design aspects that I loved. Firstly, this band is made from liquid silicone rubber – a material that felt comfortable on my skin and smooth to the touch. It’s also both swimproof and sweatproof, making it totally workout-ready.

And there’s more. This band comes in a variety of eye-catching colorways, including Northern Lights (neon green), Periwinkle (a blue-ish purple) and Peony (pink). These colors were added in Spring 2025 – just after I picked up the far less adventurous black variant. I know. I’m still not over it.

But look, I’m going to have to burst the Apple Solo Loop’s bubble for a second. It's pretty prone to picking up loose fibers and dust, which means it may need a bit of a clean every few days – something that won’t bother you with a model like the Apple Nike Sport Loop. On top of that, the closed nature of this band means it’s not the most breathable, so it’s not the best suited for runs or gym sessions.

One more thing – this isn’t the cheapest Apple Watch band on the market, carrying a list price of $49 / £49. Sure, that’s in line with the more affordable first-party options, like the Apple Sport Band, for instance. But it’s worth noting that there are some more budget-friendly third-party options out there, like the Upeak Sport Strap and Yoohoo Adjustable Metal Strap – both of which you can often get for less than £10 in the UK.

So when all’s said and done, I think it’s fair to say that the Apple Solo Loop is a very solid option for anyone seeking out a new Apple Watch band. It’s comfortable, easy to fit and vibrant (if you want it to be), not to mention the fact it's both swim and sweatproof. Sure, it’s not as breathable or dust-resistant as some of its rivals, but in the end, the Solo Loop is still worthy of my recommendation.

(Image credit: Future) Apple Solo Loop review: price & specs

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Apple Solo Loop? Buy it if…

You want ultimate simplicity
If you don’t want to mess around with fastening up your Apple Watch, I understand – it can be kinda annoying, especially when you’re in a rush. With the Apple Solo Loop, all you have to do is slide the strap over your hand and onto your wrist. That’s really it!

You want to add a splash of color to your wrist
Look… I know the black band I picked out isn’t the most vivid, but there are much more exciting options for the Apple Solo Loop, I promise! There’s Peony, Periwinkle, Northern Lights… even Light Blush if you’re into that. So rest assured, there’s plenty of ways to spice things up a bit.

Don't buy it if…

You want the best watch strap for workouts
Unlike alternatives such as the Apple Nike Sport Band, there are no holes in the Apple Solo Loop. That means it’s not as breathable – something that’s not ideal if you’re in the midst of a sweat-heavy workout. It’s great for underwater activities though, thanks to its swimproof material, so it just depends what kinda activities you’re getting into.

You want a more dust-resistant option
This Apple Watch band is slightly prone to picking up dust and fibers and if that’s something that’ll annoy you, it’s probably best avoided. Instead, I’d suggest checking out the Apple Nike Sport Loop. That model is made from nylon yarn and is much less susceptible to picking up unwanted fluff.

Apple Solo Loop review: also consider

Apple Nike Sport Band
The Apple Nike Sport Band is still my go-to whenever I’m wearing the Apple Watch SE. That’s because it has a smooth, breathable design, cool color options and a highly adjustable fit.. On top of that, it’s sweat and water-resistant. I mean, what more could you want? Read our full Apple Nike Sport Band review.

Roborock Qrevo Master: two-minute review

Originally launched in May 2024, the Roborock Qrevo Master is a high-end robotic vacuum and mop that produces an impressive blend of power, intelligence and convenience. Boasting 10,000Pa suction, dual rubber rollers and flexible side brush, the Qrevo Master effectively tackles dust, debris and pet hair on a variety of surfaces, while its dual spinning mops and consistent downward pressure ensure a very decent level of hard floor cleaning and light stain removal.

Navigation is always a key standout feature among Roborock models and this one's no different. The Qrevo Master's LiDAR mapping and AI-powered obstacle avoidance allows the bot to maneuver around furniture and most larger household objects. However, when it comes to small obstacle avoidance there are more efficient models out there that perform better in this regard.

The Qrevo Master's self-maintaining dock, meanwhile, adds an extra layer of convenience, automatically emptying the dustbin, refilling the robot's water tank and washing and drying the two mop pads. For those seeking a premium, low-maintenance floor cleaning solution, the Qrevo Master is an excellent choice, and holds its own against the best robot vacuums on the market, despite not being the very newest model out. Read on for my full Roborock Qrevo Master review.

(Image credit: Future) Roborock Qrevo Master review: price & availability

• List price: $1,599 / £1,199 / AU$2,199 (regularly discounted in all territories)
• Launched: May 2024

At list price, the Roborock Qrevo Master costs $1,599 in the US (although at time of writing, it was down to $899.99, which is the kind of price you should expect to actually pay for this model). In the UK it's £1,199, but again you should expect not to have to actually pay that – at time of writing it's down to £799.99. In Australia, the list price is AU$2,699 but it's currently discounted to AU$2,199.

Even at those discounted prices, it's still a premium robot vacuum. However, it's far from the most expensive model on the market – most brands' newest flagship models are well into the four figures in the US and UK.

At time of writing the Qrevo Master is still a relatively new model – it launched May 2024. However, the world of robovacs moves fast, and there are now several newer bots in the Roborock range. It occupies a spot somewhere in the middle of the Qrevo lineup, between the basic and budget-friendly Qrevo Q5 Pro+ and the expensive but excellent Qrevo Curv. The latest options to join the lineup are the Saros 10 and Saros 10R, both of which cost far more than the Qrevo Master and introduce some cool (if not wholly essential) new tech.

(Image credit: Future)

While not the best or most advanced robot vacuum in the Roborock lineup, the Qrevo master is still a mighty fine option that delivers on many fronts, not least its excellent navigation and vacuuming skills.

While there are other sterling robot vac manufacturers out there – namely Dreame, Eufy and Narwal – I personally always gravitate to the Roborock brand simply because the Chinese company's products are so reliable and usually ahead of the curve. Where Roborock goes, others follow.

Is the Qrevo Master good value? I'd say it sort of is given that most robot vacs with this level of smarts retail for around the same price. Nevertheless, there are some outstanding cheaper options around if you know where to look. (In the UK, the phenomenal Xiaomi X20+ performs almost as well as the Qrevo Master for around £500 less – it's the best budget robot vacuum I've tested, by some margin).

• Value for money score: 3.5 out of 5

Roborock Qrevo Master specs Roborock Qrevo Master review: design

• Slightly basic looking hybrid bot, and a little on the tall side
• Dual rubber brush rollers and rotating mop pads
• Comprehensive dock, including mop cleaning and drying

I guess I've been spoiled by the clean Scandinavian-style design aesthetics of Roborock's latest premium models, the Saros 10 and 10R, because the Qrevo Master's robot unit looks a bit old fashioned with its large, plastic LiDAR unit and oversized bumpers. At 10.3cm in height, it's also quite tall which means it will have trouble passing under some low-slung furniture.

Roborock's newer (pricier) robots outshine the Qrevo Master in this area – the Saros 10 has a puck that can pop up and down, and the Qrevo Slim and Saros 10R don't have a puck at all. All look significantly slicker and more modern than the Qrevo Master.

I'm not too enamored of the medical white color scheme of my review model – I much prefer the back version that appears in the studio photos in this review.

(Image credit: Future)

Let's tackle this model's navigation system first. Like all the very best robots, the Qrevo Master uses LiDAR and an RGB camera to find its way around a home, and its accuracy is second to none. In fact you can see the results during its very first mapping run in real time on the Roborock app. The RGB camera can also be used to monitor a room by driving the robot around like a remote controlled car.

(Image credit: Future)

However, while the Qrevo Master's large obstacle avoidance (furniture legs, etc) is above par – its Reactive AI software can identify and avoid 62 objects across 20 categories – its obstacle detection isn't as precise as the company's very latest navigation systems. After all, today's technology moves at such a pace that something considered groundbreaking a few months previous is very soon superseded by another that's lightyears ahead.

You do get a very decent tranche of vacuuming tech with this unit, including very effective dual rubber brush rollers with an anti-tangling device and an automatically extendable side brush that pops out in corners of a room. This model boasts 10,000Pa which is short of its higher-end stablemates but still perfectly acceptable for practically all cleaning scenarios, bar perhaps very deep pile carpet.

There are five levels of power to choose from – Quiet, Balanced, Turbo, Max and MAX+. Since the robot's battery is more than up to the task of vacuuming a large space (it has a running time of about 60 minutes in Max mode) , I would always opt for Max or MAX+ because, well, why wouldn't you?

(Image credit: Future)

On the mopping front this model comes with two circular toweling pads and, like many current high-end models, one of the mopping pads can also extend outwards to clean along skirting boards and around furniture legs. Both mops are pushed into the floor while they spin at 200rpm, giving any hard floor a good seeing to. This style mop tends to do a more effective scrubbing job than the static D-shaped pad still found on many robot vacuums – even the high-end models.

The mops themselves are pre-dampened by a small onboard 80ml water tank that is in turn filled in the dock just before going out on a mopping run. You can select up to 30 levels of water flow in the excellent Roborock app.

Of course, one wouldn't want any damp mops running slipshod over one's lovely carpets so the mops on this model lift by a few centimeters whenever the bot is traversing carpets or rugs. Likewise, its vacuum brush rollers also rise up whenever the robot is mopping or returning to base.

Dock design

At 521 x 340 x 487mm, the Qrevo Master's dock is considerably taller than many of its peers and that means it will be harder to position without it being too conspicuous. In fact this dock shares some design aesthetics with the Dreame L40 Ultra I reviewed a while back, including a very similar looking dust bag cover. But thankfully Roborock steered away from giving it any tasteless gold colored details.

(Image credit: Future)

It's not the most unpleasant looking dock I've seen, but compared to the gorgeous mirrored finish Roborock has applied to its Saros range, it certainly could do with a bit of a facelift. Thankfully the black option doesn't look quite as ungainly because, well, it's black and therefore less noticeable in a room filled with wooden furniture.

Like all good contemporary hybrid robot cleaners, the Qrevo Master's dock offers a fully automated maintenance system that empties the contents of the robot's small internal 220ml bin into the dock's larger 2.2-liter dust bag whenever it has finished a vacuum session. Having a robot with a self-emptying feature is an absolute must, especially if you have shedding pets in the home. Without one you will need to continually empty the robot's tiny bin yourself, sometimes halfway through a cleaning session and, believe me, that's no fun.

(Image credit: Future)

Since this model also wet mops hard floors, it comes equipped with a mop cleaning facility that washes both mops with hot water at 60C to break down dirt and bacteria. Aside from emptying the mucky contents of the 3.5-litre dirty water tank, filling the 4-liter fresh water container, and very occasionally removing the entire mopping tray from the dock to rinse and scrub it under tap, there's very little human interjection required with this machine.

• Design score: 4 out of 5

Roborock Qrevo Master review: performance

• Very good vacuuming and mopping performance
• Reliable LiDAR navigation but poor obstacle avoidance
• Effective dock with minimal human interaction needed

This robot vacuum does a lot of different things, so to keep everything clear, I've separated this section into a range of different performance elements. I'll start with navigation performance, then move on to obstacle avoidance. Next I'll get into vacuuming and mopping performance and finally I'll cover how well the dock held up during testing.

Navigation performance

Top marks as usual to Roborock for this bot's navigation prowess. From the moment you set it all up – a breeze, it must be said – the bot trundles off without getting lost and quickly maps your entire floor plan in about five minutes. It then returns to its charging station and proceeds to dock as accurately as a spaceship.

(Image credit: Future)

I've since placed the Qrevo Master in our village hall – an extremely demanding 127 square metres of wooden flooring – and the Qrevo Master has never once lost its way or missed a section. Sometimes very large spaces with lots of reflective windows can affect a robot vac's LiDAR navigation performance and this usually manifests itself as a strange anomaly on the app's map interface where the room is mysteriously multiplied in size. This happened on a couple of occasions with the Dreame L40 Ultra. By contrast, the Qrevo Master's complex three-room map hasn't altered at all in three weeks of regular use.

Obstacle avoidance

This is the only test where the Qrevo Master showed its Achilles Heel. For my test I used a collection of small and large dog toys, plus a phone cable. At first the Qrevo Master simply steamrollered even some of the larger toys. Activating the 'Pet' setting in the Reactive Obstacle avoidance menu in the app makes a big difference to Roborock bots' detection skills, but I double-checked and I had indeed already selected this option.

I then ran the test again and, for some bizarre reason, it behaved a little bit better – as if it was going through a learning process. Nevertheless, like the vast majority of bots I've tested, it ran right over the small nylon dog bone and failed to extricate itself. And, while it at first appeared to avoid the charge cable, it soon changed its mind and simply ran over it and then dragged it around the rug.

(Image credit: Future)

It's difficult to tell why this model had such issues with obstacle avoidance, but in its defense, its day-to-day schedules have always gone without a hitch – when it has encountered a stray dog toy, it's simply pushed them to the side when not actively avoiding them. However, I agree that this is not ideal given the cost of the machine in the first place.

Hence, if you have a messy home with small items littering the floor, you'd be better off with the Roborock Qrevo Curv, the newer Roborock Saros 10R or the Dreame L40 Ultra. All three of these bots excel at obstacle avoidance.

Vacuum performance

For my hard floor test I measured 22 grams of oats, uncooked orzo, cornflakes, flour and a crushed cheese cracker. I then set a cleaning zone in the kitchen and commanded the robot to perform two passes using Max power. While some of the debris was scattered by the spinning side brush (a common occurrence with all robot vacs), it generally performed extremely well, collecting 21g when measured on the scales.

Image 1 of 2

Before the vacuuming test... (Image credit: Future)Image 2 of 2

... and after (Image credit: Future)

Granted, a few remnants of oats remained and some flour was left in the cracks but this was easily fixed by using a standard stick vac to finish the job. While not as successful as, say, the Roborock Saros 10R or Dreame L40, the Qrevo Master still proved to be very adept at hard floor sweeping.

Before (left) and after the vacuuming test on a rug (Image credit: Future)

I then set up a similar medium-pile rug test using the same 22g of ingredients. This test produced excellent results, with 22g back on the scales. However, it had also collected some extra pet hair and dust in the process so I would say pickup was nearer to 21g. That's an excellent result in my opinion. Best of all, I couldn't see any remnants on the rug from head height – and that's about as much as anyone could wish for.

Mopping performance

I'm not a big fan of robot vacs that also mop because I don't believe any of them are capable of replacing a human's ability to deeply wash a hard floor or target a specific area using either an old fashioned mop and bucket or one of those newfangled wet-and-dry cordless mops that are doing the rounds.

For instance, I would never consider going through the rigmarole of sending a robot mop to attend to an accidental spill when I can get the job done in a fraction of the time. However, I can see robot mops being useful at keeping on top of a pre-cleaned floor if programmed to run a series of regular mopping schedules.

(Image credit: Future)

Since this model uses two circular spinning mop pads, I knew before even starting my test that it would be efficient enough for a pass. And sure enough it mopped up all traces of the milk and soy sauce mix I spilled on the floor – in a single sweep no less. It even continued to move over the same spot a number of times, just for good measure. However, like most robot mops I've tested, it did leave a slightly sticky but invisible residue behind after the floor had dried. After the cleaning test, the robot duly returned to its dock to have the mops cleaned and dried using hot air to help keep mold at bay.

(Image credit: Future) Dock performance

Since I have two Labradors and three cats, my home is always full of hair. In fact, I often find odd strands of Labrador hair in the most surprising places. As a consequence of all this hair, some robot vac docks I've tested have become blocked due to an excessive amount of hair stuffed into the robots' tiny bins.

If the dock's suction isn't powerful enough, chances are a bundle of hair will block the air intake, either where the robot meets with the dock's suction tube or, more than likely, at the end of its travel where the suction tube connects with the dock's dust bag. This kind of anomaly is easily rectifiable but also unnecessarily messy, especially given the fact that you buy a robot vac to do all the graft so you don't have to.

(Image credit: Future)

Well I'm pleased to say that the Qrevo Master's dock suction levels are easily high enough to draw everything out of the robot's bin and into the dock's large 2.2-liter disposable dust bag with no issues whatsoever. (I'd rate it amongst the best robot vacuums for pet hair in this regard.) In fact, the dock's suction was powerful enough to draw a heavy snooker cue tip into the dust bag, and not many robot docks are capable of that level of suction.

(Image credit: Future)

As a postscript, I should add that this robot has been employed full-time in our village hall for several weeks now, and the hall's main floor, its kitchen and toilet area have never looked cleaner. The Qrevo Master vacuums this enormous 127 square metre space three times a week and mops it twice a week. At no time has it ever got stuck in five weeks of regular use. It deftly vacuums the entire hall (even beneath a pile of chairs in one corner), keeps the hall's loos spick and span and stays on top of any kitchen mess. This just goes to prove that robot vacs – and mops – are just as suitable for commercial use as they are for domestic settings.

• Performance score: 4.5 out of 5

Roborock Qrevo Master review: app

• Highly customizable
• Easy to navigate
• Extremely comprehensive

I've said it before and I'll say it again – right now there is no better robot vac app for sheer comprehensiveness and ease of use than Roborock's. This app has it all, from scheduling and specific zone tasks, to a myriad of deep customization tweaks. That includes changing the amount of time the bot returns to the dock to have its dustbin emptied, editing the room surface and direction of wooden flooring, adding no-go zones, even adding furniture icons to the map so it looks like something out of the Sims.

Image 1 of 2

(Image credit: Roborock / Future)Image 2 of 2

(Image credit: Roborock / Derek Adams)

Another great thing about this app is that you can programme a set of ‘Routines' like ‘vacuum the lounge' or ‘mop the kitchen' and save them all on the home screen for instant access. Roborock's tech bods left no stone unturned when developing this app and the results speak for themselves.

• App score: 5 out of 5

Should you buy the Roborock Qrevo Master? Buy it if...

Your home has a complex layout

The Qrevo Master's navigation is top dollar.

You have pets in the home

This model handled my two dogs' and three cats' hair extremely well.

You need a robot that also mops

The Qrevo Master does a very decent job of mopping, and the comprehensive dock also takes care of various maintenance tasks.

Don't buy it if...

You want the best of the best

Newer Roborock models have more cutting-edge features, including things like retractible navigation pucks for cleaning under low furniture.

You have a cluttered home

The Qrevo Master isn't a master of obstacle avoidance, so you'll want to tidy up before sending this bot out.

You're on a tight budget

There are lower-priced options on the market, albeit with less comprehensive docks.

How I tested the Roborock Qrevo Master

I lived with the Qrevo Master for several weeks to get a real feel for its performance. I also TechRadar's standard robot vacuum tests to assess performance.

The first thing we're looking for is overall suction performance on different floor types. For this, I spilled a selection of loose ingredients on both hard flooring and carpet and observed the results. Did the robot sweep it all up in a single sweep or did it snowplough everything? Did it scatter the ingredients in the process? Did it leave anything behind after a few passes? I then ran similar tests using liquids, to test this hybrid robot's mopping efficiency.

Aside from performance, I also looked at the design of the robot and self-emptying dock, tested the effectiveness of its obstacle avoidance, and considered how quickly it mapped my home's floor plan when first taking it out of the box. I spent time digging into its app to see how extensive and usable it is, and if any improvements could be made.

Read more about how we test robot vacuum cleaners

• First reviewed April 2025

Belkin BoostCharge 25W Wall Charger with PPS review

Right, strap in everyone, this one’s a real mouthful… the Belkin BoostCharge 25W Wall Charger with PPS is a single port, USB-C charger that will get the vast majority of modern handsets fighting fit in no time.

Of course, this isn’t going to be the best at juicing up one of the latest MacBooks or Chromebooks, for instance, due to its 25W output. But that’s OK. After all, this model is really for those that just want to charge their phone or wireless headphones on the go, say. And that, reader, is a purpose this model serves well.

I tried charging up my Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and it reached 100%, starting from 0% in just under 80 minutes – the kind of speed I’d hope to see from the best Android phone chargers and best iPhone chargers. Of course, this model won’t be able to unlock peak performance on a phone like the Honor Magic 7, which can manage 100W wired charging, but most iPhones and Samsung handsets will be able to fast charge with this Belkin plug.

It’s also worth noting that this charger never got too hot when bringing my phone back to life. That’s thanks to its use of PPS technology, which ensures dynamic power delivery. It's also worth noting that this model only supports 20W charging for iPhone, though you may find that’s plenty for a rapid rejuvenation of power.

Beyond performance, this charger is a bit of a mixed bag, though. Build quality is solid and there’s a nice textured finish to the outer casing, but I still didn’t love this charger’s design. In honesty, it’s a little bit bulky for a 25W charger, especially compared to models like the Anker Nano USB-C 30W or UGreen Nexode Mini 30W.

Also, its prongs slide down, but they’re not fully foldable – something I always like, as it enables me to simply slot the charger into my pocket when out and about, without the fear of being poked in the side.

Pair that with the lack of USB-C cable in the box – at least for the UK variant I tested – and the $19.99 / £17.99 / AU$29.95 feels reasonable rather than cheap. Especially when the models I mentioned above are priced very similarly, but are more compact, attractive and powerful. And, all in all, I can’t help but feel there are better value options available for the money. So, even though the Belkin BoostCharge 25W Wall Charger with PPS is a steady performer, it can’t quite top the best of the best single-port alternatives.

(Image credit: Future) Belkin BoostCharge 25W Wall Charger with PPS review: Price & specs

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Belkin BoostCharge 25W Wall Charger with PPS? Buy it if…

You just need a basic phone charger
This Belkin charger isn’t the most mighty or multi-talented. It offers 25W and a single USB-C port, which isn’t going to be enough for some. Having said that, you’re gonna get more than enough power to fast-charge some of the best Samsung phones and best iPhones, so if you don’t need anything fancy, this will still certainly do the trick.

You’ve got a slow USB-A plug and want an upgrade
If you’re fed up with slow charging from your old USB-A fitted phone charger, this alternative from Belkin is sure to take things up a notch. It will almost certainly deliver faster charging speeds – ideal for when you need some extra juice on the go. It’s worth noting, though, that this charger doesn’t come with a USB-C cable, so you’ll need to grab your own elsewhere.

Don't buy it if…

You have a more power-hungry handset
Some modern smartphones are capable of charging at a far higher wattage than 25W. For example, the OnePlus 13 can charge up to 80W, so you’ll be better off using single port charging on a model like the UGreen Uno 100W if you’re looking to access peak performance.

You want a splash of style
This isn’t the most stylish charger out there. Sure, it comes in two colorways, black and white, but still, it has a pretty plain looking aesthetic. Meanwhile, the Anker Nano USB-C 30W comes in more unique colors, has foldable prongs and also a textured exterior.

Belkin BoostCharge 25W Wall Charger with PPS: Also consider

UGreen Nexode Mini 30W
The UGreen Nexode Mini 30W is among my favorite single-port phone chargers thanks to its attractive, shiny appearance, compact build and foldable prongs. It has a bit more power than this Belkin charger but is no more expensive. There’s no USB-C cable in the box here either, but if we’re talking all-round value, this is a superior alternative. Read our full UGreen Nexode Mini 30W review.

Google Pixel 9a: Two-minute review

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

The Google Pixel 9a is a solid Android phone that punches far above its weight in important ways, even if the new direction for A-series phone design is a letdown. I'll try not to spend this whole review dwelling on how ugly this phone is – the photos speak for themselves – but I was surprised that Google abandoned its excellent Pixel design for this phone.

The Pixel 9a performs as well as the Pixel 9 in almost every way. It takes photos that look nearly as good as the pics I get from my Pixel 9 Pro. It has most of the latest AI features that make the Pixel a compelling choice for Google fans. I just wish it looked like a Pixel.

Don’t get me wrong; I love the color of the Peony review sample that Google sent me. Actually, TechRadar got two samples, and both were pink, so clearly Google likes this color as much as we do. The color is a perfect match with the Peony silicone case that Google supplied, and I kept the phone covered for most of my time testing it.

The Pixel 9a, Pixel 9, and Pixel 9 Pro (left to right) (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

Putting the phone in its case was like putting lipstick on a pig. For the Pixel 9a, Google took the sharp, stylish, distinctive design language it used the Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro and threw it in the garbage.

This phone is flat and boring. The camera bump is apologetic, rather than the bold statement the bump on the Pixel 9 makes. You would be forgiven for mistaking this phone for a cheap Motorola or Nokia, or an off-brand phone you find in the back of your carrier store.

I don’t get it. The best explanation I can muster is that the Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro camera bar is expensive to produce, and the A-series phones are supposed to be a bargain. But Google cut plenty of other corners on this phone that should have offset the cost of a better design.

For instance, the camera sensors are much, much smaller than the sensors on the Pixel 8a. The main sensor is less than half the size, and that’s a massive drop for the most important spec in terms of camera quality. The Pixel 9a still manages to snap great photos, but this downgrade should have saved Google enough money to pay for a fancy new dress.

The Pixel 6a, Pixel 7a, and Pixel 8a (left to right) all look like the other Pixel phones in their series (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

The Pixel 8a also launched with the same 8GB of RAM as the Pixel 8. The Pixel 9a keeps the 8GB of memory, but the Pixel 9 now offers 12GB (and the Pixel 9 Pro packs 16GB!), which makes a difference when it comes to running all of the AI features on the phone.

The Pixel 9a has a larger battery than the Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro, even though all three phones have a 6.3-inch display. However, in my time with the Pixel 9a, battery life was good but not extraordinary, and our Future Labs tests show that its battery life is somehow not measurably better with that larger cell inside.

Is the Pixel 9a a letdown? Not at all! Google’s AI features remain the most useful smartphone AI tools you’ll find – I regularly use the AI phone call features to hang up on spammers, wait on hold for me, or record an especially important phone call.

Google Gemini on the Pixel 9a has also gotten much better – and it even improved during my two weeks with the phone, as Google added the ability for Gemini to use the camera and discuss what it sees.

For the price – $499 / £499 / AU$849 – you won’t find a phone that feels so polished and capable. You may find more camera features on a phone like the Samsung Galaxy A56, but you won’t get better photos than you’ll take with the Pixel 9a, especially not macro shots, which is the Pixel 9a’s new specialty.

Trying to beautify the Pixel 9a as best I can (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

You might find snappier performance elsewhere, but the Pixel 9a’s Tensor G4 chip is powerful enough to for Google to guarantee seven years of major Android and security updates, and that’s the best promise you’ll get in this price range. If you need a bargain phone and you don’t want to replace it, like, ever, the Pixel 9a would be the first phone I recommend.

Except for one small thing: the Pixel 8a might be just as good. The Pixel 9a isn’t much faster, and it doesn’t do anything the Pixel 8a can’t do, other than offering the latest Google AI features. If the AI aspect of Google’s phones isn’t enticing, you might be just as satisfied saving even more money and getting the Pixel 8a, especially if it goes on sale again soon.

Actually, if you’re considering the Pixel 9a and you want the best possible bargain, you may want to wait a bit longer. The Pixel 8a went on sale in May of 2024 and the price dropped by $100 for one deal in the US in August. The current global economic uncertainty aside, Google loves to goose sales of its A-series phones with a great deal, so look out for price drops on the Pixel 9a. Or just buy the Pixel 8a – because at least that phone looks like a Pixel.

Google Pixel 9a review: Price and availability

The Pixel 9a in Obsidian, Porcelain, Iris, and Peony (top to bottom) (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

• Priced at $499 / £499 / AU$849 for 128GB of storage and 8GB of RAM
• Available in Peony, Iris, Porcelain and Obsidian

The Pixel 9a is available now for $499 / £499 / AU$849, after a delay caused by a mysterious 'passive component' issue. My review sample did not seem to have any performance problems or build-quality issues, so I guess we’ll never know what held back the Pixel 9a for a few weeks.

The Pixel 9a costs the same as last year’s Pixel 8a did at launch, but this year there's no competing iPhone SE at an even lower price to consider. Apple has effectively vacated the $500 phone market by selling the new iPhone 16e for a laughable $599 / £599 / AU$999.

If you’re looking for a $500 phone, the Pixel 9a is one of your best options, along with the Samsung Galaxy A56. Samsung hasn’t started selling that phone in the US as I write this, but we have reviewed it, and we know it’s coming to the US later this year.

See! A bargain phone can look cool, not clunky (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

You might also consider the Nothing Phone 3a Pro, a quirky Android that costs $459 / £449 / AU$849, though it’s only available in the US through a beta program.

Of all the phones in this price range, the Pixel 9a should get software and security updates for longer than the rest. The Pixel gets a seven-year promise, while Samsung gives you six years, and the rest of the Android world promises three or fewer.

• Value score: 5/5

Google Pixel 9a review: Specs

The Pixel 9a hiding behind the Pixel 9 because it knows that it's ugly (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

The Pixel 9a uses the same Google Tensor G4 chipset as the Pixel 9 Pro and the rest of the Pixel 9 family. This is Google’s biggest strength with its bargain phones, because the Tensor contains the magic sauce that lets Google promise seven years of major OS updates for its latest phones (though none of them have actually been around for seven years, yet).

The Tensor G4 isn’t a performance beast, but it’s good enough for the Pixel 9a to get by, albeit with a bit of sluggishness. The initial setup process especially was a slog, as the phone gets bogged down when you try to download a lot of apps and then, you know, use them.

The paltry 8GB of RAM inside became noticeable when I used the AI features, and the Pixel 9a inexplicably doesn't have the new Screenshots app that debuted on the Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro. That app gathers all of your screenshots and runs them through the AI so you can ask questions about what it sees; I guess 8GB of RAM is not enough for that level of on-device processing.

I'm very nervous about the next seven years with this phone, if we’re already seeing Google omit features on day one that the rest of the Pixel 9 phones have. I suspect that whatever Android update the Pixel 9a gets in seven years will be only a portion of what the rest of the Pixel phones will receive, but at least security holes should be plugged.

Google Pixel 9a review: Design

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

• A major departure from Pixel design
• The ugliest Pixel phone ever

Let’s start with a compliment: I like the colors. I like the Peony pink and the lavender Iris hues, and even the Porcelain and Obsidian look premium, not basic. I also like that the cases match perfectly with the phone, giving the handset some needed dimension and texture.

Okay, that’s all the nice I have in me for this phone's design. I’m only being mean to the butt-ugly Pixel 9a because I really liked the Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro redesign, and I can’t believe Google didn’t carry the new look down to the bargain basement.

The Pixel 9a is just a flat slab of plastic broken by a round camera bump. It has no personality or character – it looks like somebody punched a Pixel 9 square in the nose and flattened its whole face.

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

The Pixel 9a has the same-size screen as the Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro, but the bezels are noticeably thicker. The phone is nicely rounded, like the Pixel 9, but the back is a matte-finish plastic, not shiny glass. Google says 23% of the Pixel 9a is recycled materials, by weight.

To be fair, the Pixel 9a is thinner than the Pixel 9 if you count the camera bump – that bar adds 3mm to the thickness of the latter phone. If you really want a phone that is borin… er, flat, this is a good pick.

Google also says the Pixel 9a is the most durable Pixel A-series phone yet. It can withstand a dunk in up to 1.5m of fresh water for 30 minutes, so feel free to drop it in the toilet and give it a flush, then rinse it in the sink.

• Design score: 3/5

Google Pixel 9a review: Display

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

• Very bright and colorful display
• Questionable Adaptive Display settings should be turned off

The Pixel 9a has an excellent screen that's very bright and colorful, continuing Google’s dominance in this aspect of the smartphone world. This would be a great display for a phone at any price, but it’s a standout feature on a bargain phone; you won’t find a better or brighter screen on a phone this cheap.

I was feeling a bit let down by the display for my first few days with the Pixel 9a, but then I turned off the Adaptive Display mode and things got much brighter. For some reason, Adaptive Display was keeping my phone very dark no matter where I used it, but when I took control the experience got exponentially better.

The screen can refresh at up to 120Hz, but frankly I’m not sure the phone can keep up with any content moving that fast. Scrolling through the apps and settings menus felt more stuttery on the Pixel 9a than on the Pixel 9 Pro, and I can only assume that more RAM would pick things up.

The phone has Gorilla Glass 3 on the front, which is durable but not as scratch-resistant as the latest Gorilla Glass Victus materials. I noticed some hairline scratches on the screen after only a week of use, although these weren't distracting. The back of the phone is plastic, not glass, so it should be more durable.

• Display score: 4/5

Google Pixel 9a review: Software

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

• A polished version of Android, with many updates to come
• Doesn’t have all the features of the rest of the Pixel family

The Google Pixel 9a launches with Android 15 on board, and it should get updates through Android 22 in 2032, if humanity survives that long. Google has only been making this seven-year promise for three years, so we can’t be sure what those eventual updates will look like, but Google also regularly drops new features, or brings newer features to older phones, in software updates it calls Pixel Drops.

Google’s version of Android is the most refined you can get, with the fewest extraneous features. Where Android used to be known for its heavy customization options, now you’d have to download a whole new launcher app if you want to organize your app list into folders or tweak the interface behavior. Today’s Android is simpler, and better for it.

You can no longer group apps into folders or even change the order of the app list (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

Google also has some of the most useful AI tools on its smartphones; and, where other phone makers have the same features, Google does it better. For instance, Google’s Voice Recorder app is the best at transcribing what it hears into text. It will label individual speakers, and you can simply tap on a word to jump to the moment in the recording when it was spoken. Samsung and other Android phone makers have similar software, but it doesn’t work as well; not even close.

I especially like Google’s AI calling tools. When I get a mysterious phone call, I can have Google’s AI answer and screen the call; spammers always hang up at this point. If I’m on an important call that I need to remember details of, I can have the AI record and later transcribe the call. My caller will be alerted to the fact that they're being recorded, so there’s no privacy concern.

Gemini Live isn't interesting to look at, but it's fun to talk to the machine (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

Google’s Gemini Live conversation tool also got a nice boost on the Pixel 9a. Just before this phone launched, Gemini Live went multi-modal, so it can now talk to you conversationally while it looks through your camera. I pointed Gemini at the blank wall beneath my TV and asked for suggestions on how to decorate it. Gemini suggested that I add plants, then we switched the conversation to what plants I could buy that I wouldn’t kill in a month.

Of course, there are plenty of AI slop tools on the Pixel 9a as well. There's the standard image-generating tool that probably shouldn’t exist, for legal and ethical reasons, and it can now create images of human beings, which was forbidden in the past.

I have a big problem with these tools. They're bigoted by nature. If I ask Pixel Studio for an image of ‘a successful person,’ I get five images of young, able-bodied people. The selection may be racially diverse, but it still holds onto so many stereotypes that it should simply not be on a phone.

If I ask Pixel Studio for an image of ‘a Jewish man,’ I get the most stereotypical caricature of Jewish identity: an older man with a full beard and a head covering. If I ask for ‘a Palestinian man,’ it refuses to create anything, which is its own harmful erasure and stereotyping, as if any image of a Palestinian man should be considered potentially harmful.

Image 1 of 3

I asked Pixel Studio for "A Jewish man" and got these three images in a row (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)Image 2 of 3

I asked Pixel Studio for "A Jewish man" and got these three images in a row (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)Image 3 of 3

I asked Pixel Studio for "A Jewish man" and got these three images in a row (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

Sorry, this Pixel has no business creating images of people if it resorts to stereotypes. I’m not sure when it became acceptable for a smartphone to reinforce bigotry, but it’s not something I’ll ever be comfortable with. Google should remove this capability from Pixel Studio immediately.

• Software score: 2/5

Google Pixel 9a review: Cameras

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

• Surprisingly good photos that look like Pixel 9 Pro pics
• Astonishing macro capabilities that rival my DSLR – seriously

I've been pleasantly surprised by the Pixel 9a’s camera capabilities. This phone continues the A-series tradition of producing photos that look almost identical to the shots you’d get from the Pro-series device, albeit at a much lower resolution.

The Pixel 9a has a 48MP camera, but it uses a pixel binning technique and will only produce images that are 12MP. Even the raw files it produces are 12MP or less.

That’s fine by me! I think 12MP is the perfect size for sharing, whether you send photos to friends or post them to your favorite social app. You won’t be able to zoom in later, and you might miss the fine details, but 12MP is a good compromise for a bargain phone. To be fair, the Pixel 9 has a 50MP camera and that phone also limits its photo output to 12MP.

I was expecting the Pixel 9a cameras to be much less capable, because the sensors have been reduced in size compared to the Pixel 8a, and are much smaller that the sensors you’ll find on the Pixel 9 or Pixel 9 Pro. The Pixel 9a uses a half-inch sensor for the main camera, compared to the three-quarter-inch sensor on the Pixel 9.

That doesn’t sound like much, but that’s the diagonal measurement, and the actual area of the sensor in the Pixel 9a is 57% smaller than that of the sensor the Pixel 9. That means it captures much less light, which affects every other aspect of photography.

There's much bigger sensors under that big Pixel 9 bump (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

Thankfully, Google’s AI photography magic has never been more powerful. Photos look great, nearly identical to Pixel 9 Pro photos, until you zoom in close. Then things get muddy, but the Pixel 9a produces images with accurate colors and good lighting. The iPhone 16e might be a little bit better, but it’s also much more expensive, and it lacks some of the Pixel 9a’s great features.

I was blown away by the new macro photography capabilities on the Pixel 9a. I shoot macro photos often with my Nikon D750 and Tamron 100mm macro lens, so I broke out the full-frame camera for a comparison test. The results were truly shocking.

Without a flash, the Pixel 9a totally outperformed my Nikon. I couldn’t hold the camera still enough for the 1/4 second exposure that it required, but the Pixel 9a had no trouble grabbing a sharp shot in the same dim light. Even with a flash attached, my Nikon wasn’t much more sharp than the Pixel 9a. The Pixel even managed to expose a wider swath of the subject than my Nikon at f/16.

Image 1 of 2

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)This macro shot was taken with the Pixel 9aImage 2 of 2

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)This macro shot was taken with a Nikon D750 DSLR with a Tamron 100mm macro lens

Usually, macro photography on smartphones is a gimmick performed with a pathetic 3MP camera, but on the Pixel 9a it’s so good, at full resolution, that it offers a whole reason to consider this phone. If you like shooting macro, you’ve probably never seen a smartphone that can get this close and take photos this sharp.

• Camera score: 3/5

Google Pixel 9a review: Camera samples Image 1 of 5

That is very close up (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)Image 2 of 5

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)Image 3 of 5

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)Image 4 of 5

A Long Exposure photo (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)Image 5 of 5

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future) Google Pixel 9a review: Performance

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

• Adequate performance but not what I’d call fast
• The AI features always slow things down

The Pixel 9a performs as well as the Pixel 9, for better and for worse. It was able to handle all of my favorite apps and all of Google’s features with little trouble, as long as I wasn’t asking the AI for anything. Except for some hiccups during my initial setup, when the interface ground to a halt while installing numerous apps and backup data, I had no trouble using the Pixel 9a as my primary work phone.

It’s still slow, objectively and subjectively. The menus and interface do not feel as snappy on the Pixel 9a as OneUI does on the Galaxy S25, for instance. It isn’t as smooth and responsive as iOS on any recent iPhone. Some apps take a bit longer to open, and when switching between apps it takes longer for the screen to populate.

I was still able to run all of my necessary apps, take video calls while browsing the web, and play my favorite games, including Call of Duty Mobile – I had to turn the settings down for better performance, but I had fun playing.

The Pixel 9a sends much of its AI computing to the cloud, and this slows down whatever process you're engaged in. Pixel Studio, for instance, generated images much faster on the Pixel 9, and it was even faster on the Pixel 9 Pro. Apparently RAM does make a big difference with these AI features.

• Performance score: 3/5

Google Pixel 9 Pro review: Battery

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

• The larger battery doesn’t translate to longer life
• Charging speeds are also slower, but there’s wireless

One of the big advantages Google highlights with the Pixel 9a is the larger battery – a 5,100mAh cell that's bigger than the batteries in the similarly-sized Pixel 9 or Pixel 9 Pro. I didn’t see any benefit, though.

The phone lasted through a full day of use most of the time, except on days when I did a lot of work with the AI tools and cameras. Even then, battery life was acceptable, if not exceptional.

I’m not sure why this phone isn’t lasting much longer than the Pixel 9, even though its battery is 8.5% larger. Our Future Labs testing concurs. In our battery rundown test the Pixel 9a lasted at most 13 hours and eight minutes, while the Pixel 9 lasted 13 hours and 18 minutes in the same test.

That’s not terrible, but you can find longer-lasting phones in this price range. The Nothing Phone 3a Pro lasted more than an hour longer in Future Labs. The OnePlus 13R is only a bit more expensive, and it’s our battery-life champion, with hours more battery life than the competition.

The Pixel 9a does include wireless charging, which isn’t common on a bargain phone. Nothing Phone and OnePlus omit wireless charging on their budget models, though they do have much faster wired charging than Google offers.

The Pixel 9a can only charge up to 23W, which isn’t very fast. The battery wasn’t even halfway charged after 30 minutes, and it took more than an hour to get to 100% from 1%.

• Battery score: 3/5

Should you buy the Google Pixel 9 Pro? Buy it if...

You want a great bargain camera for close-ups
While it lacks zoom, Google’s bargain Pixel has some of the best macro photography capabilities I’ve seen.

You want a solid phone to keep for a very long time
The Pixel 9a is durable, and it'll get seven years of Android and security updates. That makes it a keeper if you want a bargain phone that will last.

You want the best AI phone features
There’s a lot of AI on this phone, but the best features work with the actual Phone app to help screen calls and record important conversations.

Don't buy it if...

You want a pretty phone that you can show off
Get a case for this ugly phone, or put a bag over its head. I don’t know why Google uglified its Pixel like this, but it hurts.

You don’t want to support bigoted AI image generators
AI image generator tools that produce only stereotypes reinforce bigotry. This software isn’t acceptable on my smartphone and it needs to go.

Google Pixel 9a review: Also consider

Samsung Galaxy A56
You can’t buy the Galaxy A56 everywhere yet, but we got to review Samsung’s top bargain model, and it won us over with a high-quality build and great performance.
Read our full Samsung Galaxy A56 review

Nothing Phone 3a Pro
Like the anti-Pixel 9a, this phone is all about the cool design and showing off. The Nothing Phone doesn’t want to hide in a case, it wants to dance and party!
Read our full Nothing Phone 3a Pro review

How I tested the Google Pixel 9a

I used the Google Pixel 9a for almost two weeks. I tested the phone on AT&T’s network in the greater New York area, throughout the city and suburbs. I used the Pixel 9a as my primary work phone with all of my work accounts and apps, as well as a personal phone for photos and gaming.

I tested the Pixel 9a with a Pixel Watch 3 and Pixel Buds Pro 2. I connected the phone to my car and tested Android Auto. I connected an Xbox wireless controller for gaming.

I tested the Pixel 9a camera against the Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro, as well as the iPhone 16 and Galaxy S25. For macro photo comparisons, I compared against my Nikon D750 camera with a Tamron 100mm macro lens.

Future Labs tests phones using a mix of third-party benchmark software and proprietary, real-world tests. We use Geekbench, CrossMark, JetStream, WebXPRT and Mobile XPRT, and 3DMark for performance testing. We test a phone's performance on tasks using Adobe Premiere Rush. We also measure display color output and brightness.

For battery testing, we have proprietary rundown tests that are the same for every phone, and we determine how long it takes for the battery to run down.

Read more about how we test

Why you can trust TechRadar

☑️ 100s of smartphones reviewed
☑️ 15 years of product testing
☑️ Over 16,000 products reviewed in total
☑️ Nearly 200,000 hours testing tech

First reviewed April 2025

Vertere DG X: two-minute review

Put $5,400/ £4,150 / AU$8,500 Vertere’s way and in return you get a beautifully constructed DG X turntable, a strange-looking but remarkably capable Groove Runner X tonearm, and a cartridge that’s a lot more serious than the model name ‘Lite Sabre’ might lead you to believe. Although this review is titled 'Vertere DG X' for brevity, I'm reviewing the full package here: Vertere DG X / Groove Runner X / Lite Sabre – and what a package it is.

What’s more, you get a proper power supply and equally capable cables too. You even get a dust-cover. The DG X package is simplicity itself to set up – all the hard work has been done in the factory – so your sonic gratification need not be deferred very long at all.

And gratification is really what the Vertere DG X is dealing in – it'll be the reason it soon features in our pick of the best turntables, at any rate. It might lack the last scintilla of audio bolshiness, and not be quite as willing as some alternative designs to really attack those recordings that are, let’s face it, asking for it. But in every other respect it’s a thrillingly accomplished listen. Where control, balance, tonal fidelity, frequency response, rhythmic expression and all the other stuff that goes into making a rounded and convincing presentation, the DG X barely puts a foot wrong. And it’s engaging and entertaining at the same time – which is by no means a given no matter how much you’re spending on a record player.

(Image credit: Future) Vertere DG X review: Price & release date

The Vertere DG X / Groove Runner X / Lite Sabre package was released on March 20, 2025, and in the United Kingdom it’s yours for £4150. In the United States it sells for $5400, while in Australia the going rate is AU$8500.

There are two equally important things to bear in mind when considering this asking price. The first is that there are plenty of very capable turntable/tonearm/cartridge combinations available at this sort of money from extremely well-regarded manufacturers. The other is that Vertere itself is now firmly established as an extremely well-regarded manufacturer…

(Image credit: Future) Vertere DG X review: Features

• Microprocessor-controlled belt drive (33.3 and 45rpm)
• Tri-point articulated tonearm bearing system
• Vertere DC-2 bespoke power supply

Somehow ‘features’ seems too weak a word to describe the lengths Vertere has gone to, and the engineering mania that has been brought to bear, to deliver the DG X / Groover Runner / Lite Sabre package. Still, it’s the word I’ve been given to work with – so here goes…

The DG X turntable has a main bearing housing made of precisely machined brass alloy, with a tungsten carbide thrust ball. Its non-magnetic stainless steel spindle is mirror polished, and it features aluminium alloy plinth interface clamps. The drive system is made up of a machined acetal motor spindle thrust bearing, a machined aluminium alloy pulley along with a resonance control disc of the same material. The platter it turns is also (mostly) of machined aluminium, and Vertere supplies a cork/neoprene/nitrile mat which has, so it claims, a positive effect on the resulting sound. 33.3 or 45rpm speeds are electronically selectable via microprocessor-controlled motor drive – a silicon drive belt does the donkey work.

The Groover Runner tonearm, meanwhile, is 240mm long and an unusual flat shape. It’s made up of two bonded lengths of five-layer polymer – the idea is to minimise the resonance peak inherent in the more common tube arm designs. It’s a tri-point articulated design, and uses three captive silicon nitride balls with a machined non-magnetic bearing point. It’s similar in this way to the far more upmarket Vertere SG 1 turntable’s tonearm assembly. The azimuth setting mechanism and stainless steel counterweight have been updated - there’s now a locking aluminium alloy counterweight screw – and there’s a secondary weight that’s adjustable along much of the length of the tonearm to help with cartridge-matching.

The tonearm beam features a magnetic rest, so the arm doesn’t need to be clipped into place when it’s not active. The lift/lower mechanism is insulated, and is fixed to the non-resonant bearing pillar. The arm is pre-fitted with a new moving-magnet cartridge called Lite Sabre – it might seem a slightly flippant, pun-tastic name at first, until you realise it’s designed to offer a lot of the performance of the company’s considerably pricier Sabre MM cartridge. Naturally it’s optimised in every respect to be the perfect partner to the arm and the turntable it’s wedded to.

Power is supplied by Vertere’s DC-2 ‘Challenger’ 30V DC unit that was, until very recently, a cost option. Some very acceptable stereo RCA connection cables are included in the package too – so as far as the DG X system goes, you have everything you need to get up and running.

• Features score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Future) Vertere DG X review: sound quality

• Sky-high detail retrieval
• Rhythmically positive and assured
• Tightly unified overall presentation

I may as well get this out of the way from the get-go: the Vertere DG X package isn’t a complete all-rounder. It very nearly is, but in one respect this turntable falls fractionally short. That’s not to say it wouldn’t be ideal for your purposes, of course – but nevertheless it’s something you should be aware of.

Basically, the DG X isn’t quite as attacking or driving as it might be. With a fairly assertive recording playing (a chunky reissue of Pere Ubu’s The Modern Dance, for instance) there’s not quite the charge or the onslaught the material demands. It’s not that the DG X is overly polite – it’s prepared to bare its teeth if it absolutely has to. But other price-comparable rivals are more willing to blitz through the recording than this record player is.

And with that out of the way, I’m free to discuss all the very many ways in which the DG X is an admirable, engaging and thoroughly convincing listen. Where to start?

With frequency response, maybe? It’s absolutely even from top to bottom; the DG X delves deep into the lower frequencies and reaches high at the top end, but no area of the frequency range is overstated and no area is underplayed. It’s even-handed and unified, and the overall presentation is brilliantly naturalistic as a result.

Tonally, too, the Vertere is expertly judged. There just doesn’t seem to be any significant input into tonality from the DG X – so when you listen to something warmly analogue like Heart of the Congos by The Congos, ‘warmly analogue’ is what you get, and when you listen to something rather more chilly and austere like Kraftwerk’s Trans Europe Express what you get is chilly an… well, you get the picture. The tonal balance of this record player seems to be dictated by the music it’s playing rather than any idea of what’s ‘correct’, and it’s an impressively balanced listen as a result.

Detail levels, across the board, are sky-high – and the DG X seems to have no problem identifying the most transient episodes in a recording and placing them into context with just the right amount of weighting. Despite its attention to detail, though, it never sounds analytical or dispassionate – it simply has a happy knack for extracting every shred of information in the groove of your record and handing it over in a completely unforced manner.

Rhythms are confidently expressed, thanks to the sort of low-frequency control and authority the Vereter demonstrates, and even the gimpy tempos of Tony Allen’s Lagos No Shaking roll along as if they’re the most natural and simple thing in the world. The attention the DG X pays to harmonic variations is fanatical, and it has the sort of effortless power to put significant distance between the quietest and the most vehement moments of a recording. When the horns really start to blare, the increase in volume and intensity is made absolutely apparent.

And all of this good stuff happens without sacrificing the sort of unity and singularity of presentation for which the vinyl format is routinely prized. There’s a sense of togetherness and of performance to the way the Vertere presents music that’s extremely persuasive – and this is the case even when it’s playing music that never was a performance. Four Tet’s And They All Look Broken Hearted sounds as whole and as singular as any recording by a band playing all together in the studio.

• Sound quality score: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future) Vertere DG X review: Design

• 130 x 469 x 384mm (HxWxD including dust cover)
• Black, white or red gloss finishes
• Adjustable feet

Fundamentally, the DG X looks like a record player, but Vertere has managed to design just a little individuality into it. The company will of course tell you that everything it’s done, it’s done in the name of performance – but the fact that the result is a turntable that’s just slightly individual and even mildly dramatic in the way it looks can’t have disappointed Vertere either.

The main plinth, with its racy little angular cutaways on each of its four sides, is made up of three layers of cast acrylic arranged in a non-resonant sandwich. The filling is clear, and internally illuminated for a little visual pizzazz; the upper and lower sections are available in gloss black or gloss red as well as the gloss white of my review sample.

The substructure is a black-coated zintec steel chassis, and the entire arrangement is supported on three threaded feet that are topped (or, more correctly, bottomed) with resistive felt. They’re adjustable, naturally, so you can be sure your DG X is perfectly level. A spirit gauge is provided so you can make absolutely certain.

On the rear of the plinth, along with an input for the mains adapter, there are a pair of gold-plated RCA output sockets. Like almost every electrical element of this package, they have selectable shielding – choose from ‘signal’, ‘chassis’ or ‘floating’.

The DG X is supplied with a tinted acrylic dust-cover, and as is appropriate in the overall context of this turntable, it is designed to be as resistant to resonance as is possible. With the dust-cover attached to its hinges, the all-in weight of the Vertere is 8.5kg.

• Design score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Future) Vertere DG X review: Usability & setup

• Pre-fitted and pre-adjusted cartridge
• Simple anti-skate adjustment
• Both counterweights factory-set

It’s not unheard-of for an upmarket and shamelessly ‘audiophile’ turntable to be simple and straightforward to set up – it’s just quite rare. So it’s nice to be able to add the Vertere DG X package to the list.

As the Lite Sabre arrives connected to the Groove Runner X tonearm, everything that needs to be done has already been done in the factory. Tracking weight adjustment? Vertical tracking angle? Anti-skate, azimuth and counterweight? All taken care of. All you have to do is position the tonearm and plug its cable (which is terminated with what looks very much like a microUSB socket) into the body of the plinth and you’re in business. Well, once you’ve made a connection to an amplifier and to mains power, anyway.

And as far as usability goes, well, this is a record player – there’s next-to-nothing to it. The speed control is on a switch on the top left of the plinth as you look down on it - short presses toggle between 33.3 and 45rpm, and a long press switches the deck either on or off. Put a record on the mat, set it turning at the correct speed, lower the tonearm – and you’re in business.

• Usability and setup score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Future) Vertere DG X review: Value

‘Value’ is a slightly tricky consideration where products like this, at this sort of money, are concerned. After all, shouldn’t spending north of £4K on a turntable guarantee impressive build quality, flawless finish and stunning sound quality?

If you’ve read this far then you know all of this is covered by the Vertere DG X – and you also know that if you’re going to take full advantage of what this record player has to offer, you’ll need a similarly expensive system with which to do so.

There’s no disputing this product’s credentials, and by extension the value for money it offers. Ultimately, it’s going to depend on whether or not you enjoy the way the DG X looks, and even more importantly, the way it goes about doing the audio business…

• Value score: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Vertere DG X? Buy it if…

You enjoy a full and unequivocal account of your records
The DG X package doesn’t scrimp on the details - quite the opposite, in factView Deal

You think this sort of money should by everything you need in a record player
From power supply and cables to a pre-fitted and pre-adjusted cartridge, the Vertere is ready to goView Deal

You like a bit of thoughtful design
The DG X is just individual enough in its design to count as ‘interesting’View Deal

Don't buy it if…

You want sonic blood and thunder
The DG X is talented in very many ways, but it’s not the most attacking listenView Deal

You don’t have particularly steady hands
The Groove Runner X tri-point articulated tonearm can feel perilously loose. It isn’t, of course, it just feels it…View Deal

You own lots of 78rpm recordings
Plenty of alternative designs can indulge your throwback ways… View Deal

(Image credit: Future) Vertere DG X review: Also consider

Technics SL-1300G
The Technics SL-1300G will set you back $2,999 / £2,799 – but by the time you’ve specified an appropriate cartridge you’ll be rapidly closing in on Vertere DG X money. Sturdy and purposeful in appearance where the Vertere is relatively slender and delicate, the Technics is a potent and unshakably stable listen with plenty going for it where rhythmic expression and detail retrieval is concerned.
Read more on the Technics SL-1300GView Deal

Rega Planar 10

…Or you might go to the other visual extreme and consider the Rega Planar 10 – at $5,000 / £4,350 or so without a cartridge it’s a pricier proposition than the Vertere, and that money doesn’t seem to buy you very much stuff at all. But rest assured the Rega is a stunningly complete performer without a significant shortcoming to report on… View Deal

(Image credit: Future) How I tested the Vertere DG X

How did I test the Vertere DG X / Groove Runner X / Lite Sabre? After setting it up, I connected the turntable to a Naim Uniti Star using the supplied RCA connections. The Naim was then connected to a pair of Bowers & Wilkins 705 S3 Signature loudspeakers (bolted to their bespoke FS-700 S3 stands) using QED XT40i speaker cable.

Then, I spent well over a working week listening to as much music as I could, of many different genres, and of many different qualities of pressing, in an effort to find something the Vertere couldn’t get along with. And if this sounds in any way arduous, I assure you it wasn’t.

• First reviewed: April 2025
• Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee