Reviews

This review first appeared in issue 355 of PC Pro.

Asus’ ExpertWiFi product family speaks to small businesses and retail outlets requiring a complete network security solution that’s affordable and simple to deploy. The EBR63 is a prime example: this deceptively small router teams up dual-band Wi-Fi 6 services with a heap of gateway security measures and delivers them all for only £125.

On the wireless side, the EBR63 has an AX3000 rating derived from claimed speeds of 574Mbits/sec on its 2.4GHz radio and 2,402Mbits/sec on the 5GHz radio, with the latter supporting high-performance 160MHz Wi-Fi 6 channels. However, the EBR63’s switch is only endowed with gigabit WAN and LAN ports so you won’t see the full performance potential of its Wi-Fi 6 credentials.

A positive takeaway is support for Asus’ AiMesh technology so you can use any compatible Asus wireless device to increase wireless coverage with up to 12 mesh nodes. You can also create up to five wireless SSIDs and present custom captive portals to guests and customers.

The EBR63 is a compact plastic unit that can be wall- or ceiling-mounted using the two holes in its rear panel. It also has a flip-out desk stand, but we wouldn’t recommend using this in a busy environment as it’s quite flimsy and, with the router only weighing 415g, it could easily get knocked over.

Internet redundancy is present, with the dual WAN feature able to apply failover or load balancing across two internet connections using the WAN port and a LAN port of your choosing. A quick fix if your main internet connection goes down is to connect a mobile to the EBR63’s USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 port and use it as an instant internet backup.

The EBR63 is deceptively small and delivers decent overall speeds (Image credit: Future)

Deployment is a breeze using the ExpertWiFi mobile app. With this loaded on an iPad, we connected it to the router’s secure default SSID and followed a wizard to activate the device and update its firmware.

Management choices abound. The EBR63 presents a well-designed web interface, which we used to create more wireless, or self-defined, networks. This is nicely handled as you choose from a list that includes employee, portal, guest, scheduled and IoT options, then fill in the fields presented and choose WPA2 or the more secure WPA3 encryption. The “Scenario Explorers” makes this even easier as you choose an environment such as office, coffee shop or home working and it will present you with the most appropriate settings.

Security features are quite remarkable considering the price. The SPI firewall can be customized with up to 128 rules, while the Trend Micropowered AiProtection Pro service blocks malicious sites, stops infected systems from accessing the network, provides intrusion prevention services (IPS) and generates security assessment reports.

Web content and app filtering can be applied to selected clients where you tick boxes next to any of the four categories, choose a discovered device from the drop-down list and add a new rule. VPN options are outstanding, as Asus supports PPTP, OpenVPN, IPsec and WireGuard VPN servers, while the VPN Fusion feature creates secure connections for devices that can’t run VPN client software. In addition, quality of service (QoS) features are handled by Asus’ Adaptive QoS, which prioritizes traffic from different apps and activities using a customizable list.

The EBR63 delivers great security and traffic analysis features (Image credit: Future)

Despite only having gigabit ports, the EBR63 delivered respectable speeds in our real-world tests. Using a Dell Windows 11 Pro workstation equipped with a TP-Link Archer TXE75E Wi-Fi 6/6E PCI-E adapter, we saw close-range large file copies between the client and a LAN-connected Windows server return a rock-steady 112MB/sec, dropping to 89MB/sec with the router placed ten meters away in an adjoining room.

The ExpertWiFi EBR63 will appeal to small businesses that want all their network services and security in one, easily-managed device. The gigabit ports do limit wireless performance but overall speeds are impressive nonetheless, and Asus delivers an incredible range of security measures at a very tempting price.

We also rated the best software for small businesses.

This review first appeared in issue 356 of PC Pro.

Zyxel’s XMG1915 family of switches is aimed at small businesses that want plenty of multi-gigabit ports in a space-saving design and at a competitive price. The range comprises three models, and we reviewed the XMG1915-10EP, which provides high-power PoE++ services.

Measuring only 250 x 104 x 27mm (WDH), this desktop switch packs in eight 2.5GbE multi-gigabit ports all capable of delivering up to 60W. It partners them with a pair of 10GbE SFP+ fiber ports for high-speed uplinks. It has a good power budget of 130W, which is facilitated by a chunky 150W external power brick that’s over half the size of the switch.

The switch uses its chassis as a heatsink and its fan-less design means it’s completely silent. Management options are good: you can run it in standalone mode or hook it up with Zyxel’s Nebula Control Center (NCC) service for full cloud access.

The switch packs plenty of LEDs into its front panel, with lights showing system and cloud connection status, while a three-color PoE LED warns if you’re getting close to the power budget. Each port is also assigned an LED that shows whether its connection speed is 100Mbits/sec, gigabit or 2.5GbE.

The diminutive XMG1915-10EP packs in eight 2.5GbE multi-gigabit ports (Image credit: Future)

The switch is easy to deploy in standalone mode, with its local web console presenting four wizards for setting a default admin password and SNMP community names, and configuring security features, VLANs and quality of service (QoS). Not that it will concern the target audience, but the XMG1915-10MP is a pure Layer 2 switch and doesn’t offer the “Lite-L3” static routing features found in Zyxel’s larger PoE switches.

Standard L2 features are plentiful and include port and protocol-based VLANs plus static and LACP link aggregation groups. VoIP networks are on its radar as the switch identifies traffic from IP phones using a customizable organizationally unique identifier (OUI) list and automatically prioritizes it by dynamically creating voice VLANs.

The web console’s dashboard shows details on system utilization, port speeds, whether they’re supplying power and overall power consumption for all connected powered devices (PDs). One of three power priorities can be assigned to each port so if the power draw gets close to the maximum available, those with the lowest priority will be switched off first.

Unless you’re planning on deploying power-hungry PoE IP cameras with integral PTZ functions, it’s unlikely you’ll get close to the maximum power budget. We tested this by connecting two Zyxel Wi-Fi 6E access points (APs) and the new WBE660S Wi-Fi 7 model plus Netgear’s tri-band WAX630E AP; we saw from the web console that the total draw didn’t go above 43W, leaving us with 87W still to play with.

Cloud deployment is swift. We used the Nebula iOS app on an iPad to scan the QR code label on the switch’s base. Two minutes later the switch popped up in our cloud portal and received all our site settings, including a new admin password.

The switch can be managed in standalone mode or remotely from Zyxel’s NCC cloud portal (Image credit: Future)

The widget-based NCC dashboard can be easily customised and we added widgets to show the online status of our switch and total power usage. Selecting the switch took us to its monitoring page, with color-coded views of all ports and 24-hour traffic and power graphs, which can be extended to seven days with an optional NCC Plus license and to one year with the Pro version.

For general switch operations, Nebula provides remote access to all the same features as standalone mode. Up to five global PoE schedules can be assigned to specific ports that determine when attached PDs are active and you can disable and enable PoE services on each one as well – very handy for remotely rebooting a PD that isn’t responding.

The compact XMG1915-10EP is a great choice for small businesses that want plenty of multi-gigabit ports and high-power PoE++ services. It supports standalone and cloud management and the remarkably low price includes an impressive set of features.

We also ranked the best apps for small businesses.

This review first appeared in issue 356 of PC Pro.

TP-Link may be best known for its affordable business networking products, but it also has a strong presence in the video surveillance market. Its VIGI family offers a range of network video recorders (NVRs) and cameras, and in this review we look at its NVR1004-4P four-channel NVR and test it with TP-Link’s latest C540V outdoor PTZ IP camera.

Costing under £100, the NVR looks great value but you’ll need to add the extra cost of a SATA hard disk to store video recordings. At the rear are four network camera ports, each delivering PoE+ services, and it has a total power budget of 53W.

HDMI and VGA ports support local monitors, two old-school phono jacks are provided for audio in and out and a separate Fast Ethernet port facilitates NVR web management. Setup is easy; after fitting a 4TB Western Digital Red Pro hard disk in the NVR, we connected an HD monitor and followed the onscreen wizard.

To secure access, you choose an admin password and provide a recovery email address. You can also set a global username and password as well as a recovery email that are applied to VIGI cameras when they first come online.

The wizard finishes by displaying QR codes for TP-Link’s VIGI mobile apps. To use them, you create a TP-Link ID account and bind the NVR to it from its web console. We also loaded TP-Link’s Security Manager app on a Windows host and linked it to our ID account for remote NVR access, although this doesn’t provide event management.

It’s great value, but you’ll need to add a SATA hard disk to store recordings (Image credit: Future)

To add the C540V camera, we connected it to a PoE port and waited ten seconds while the NVR discovered it. All security settings and firmware updates were applied for us, and the NVR assigned a base set of video parameters that included enabling the latest H.265+ codec.

This IP66-rated camera delivers great image quality. Along with good contrast and color balance, it has a sharp focus, handles bright sunlight well and its motorized pan and tilt functions cover a lot of ground. The IR LED provides good night illumination up to around 20 meters, its white LEDs are blindingly bright, and the powerful integral speaker will scare the living daylights out of intruders.

(Image credit: Future)

The NVR1004-4P can’t match Synology’s DVA appliances, which provide slick people counting, face recognition and crowd control features, but it does offer a good range of detection and recording features. For basic motion detection, you draw multiple polygonal shapes in the camera view where you want it applied, set object height and width filters, tweak the sensitivity and enable human and vehicle detection.

Smart events go further, and allow you to draw lines in the camera view to denote digital fences and choose one-way or two-way directions. Custom detection zones can be monitored for objects being removed or those that linger in them for a specific period, while entry and exit regions are used to keep an eye on specific areas such as building entrances.

Along with event recording, trigger actions can include pop-up warnings, sounding NVR and camera audio alarms and activating a camera’s security lights. Recordings can be viewed from the NVR’s local monitor or web console, the Security Manager and mobile app, with options to choose camera channels and scroll through their timelines to points of interest.

The NVR supports a wide range of motion detection events (Image credit: Future)

The NVR1004-4P supports ONVIF-compliant IP cameras and it discovered our D-Link models as soon as we connected them to the PoE ports. We customized the live view to show all camera feeds, but features are more limited as we could only apply basic motion detection events to them.

You’ll need to use TP-Link’s VIGI cameras to get the best from it, but the NVR1004-4P is a good choice for small businesses seeking affordable in-house video surveillance. It offers plenty of video analytics features, the C540V camera scores highly for image quality, and the components are offered at very competitive prices.

We've also rated the best secure smartphones.

INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger review

The INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger is listed at $32.99 / £26.99 on the INIU website and is also available to purchase at Amazon. This price makes it a more costly alternative to the similar non-MagSafe Anker 313 Wireless Charger Stand, but this is warranted due to its performance and flexible design.

As this isn't a magnetic charger (although phones do need to be MagSafe to charge on it), there's nothing to stop a phone from sliding off if knocked, but the design is otherwise pretty sturdy thanks to the charging stand's overall weight and square base.

The adjustable viewing angle is my favorite part of the INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger's design. The phone cradle pivots on the top with a range of 90 degrees, so my phone could be positioned vertically or laid back almost flat. The included USB-C power cable is only a meter long – this may be adequate for some, but I would have preferred a longer length, as it limited my placement options.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future)

At first, I was unimpressed with the charging speed of the INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger, as it took over three hours to charge an iPhone 13 Pro from 0% - 100%, a test I perform on all chargers I review to be able to make a solid comparison. As this was a questionably long time for a charger that claims to be "fast", I had a read of the small print and found that INIU recommends using a charging adapter of 18 watts or higher.

Personally, I feel that any charger requiring a wall adapter above a specific output to achieve anywhere near the charging speeds stated should include one in the box. The INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger does not. Naturally, I have plenty of spare plugs about, but the average buyer may not; so it's worth bearing this in mind, as a further purchase may be needed to get the most out of this charger.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future)

Once I'd repeated the test with a suitable plug, the INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger was able to fully charge the iPhone 13 Pro in 2 hours and 16 minutes, putting it in the same league as most of the MagSafe chargers I've tested so far. This also makes it much faster than the Anker 313 Wireless Charger Stand that currently features in our list of the best wireless chargers. This result made me do a 360 on my opinion of the INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger, as this charging speed is good for the price.

Overall, this is a well-designed and versatile phone charging stand. The vast majority of the wireless chargers I test are compatible with iPhones only, so to test a charger that can charge a range of devices at a good speed with a sturdy and adjustable design has been refreshing. So if you're on the lookout for a decent and fairly priced phone charger that'll remain usable even if you switch your allegiance come upgrade time, the INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger is a good shout.

INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger review: Price & specs Should I buy the INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger? Buy it if…

You want viewing flexibility
If you're anything like me and will more often than not continue to use your phone as it recharges, then an adjustable stand is a must. The viewing angle on this INIU charger is easy to alter, making it easy to consume content while it's juicing up.

You want a versatile charger
Whether you're rocking two phones, or want a simple charging solution located in a communal space, this INIU charger's compatibility with both iPhones and Androids means less cables and clutter.

Don't buy it if…

You're a die-hard iPhone user
As much as I like this charger, as an avid iPhone user, I much prefer the reassurance that a MagSafe charger provides. It provides a more secure hold, which is appreciated by someone as klutzy as me.

You don't want to feel tethered
Granted, this isn't the only charger that comes with a disappointingly short power cable, but the 3.3 ft / 1 m cable can limit placement options.

INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger review: Also consider

Anker 313 Wireless Charger Stand
If you're just looking for something cheap and cheerful, and aren't fussed about charging speeds or adjustable angles, then this Anker charger may just take your fancy. Like the I212, it's compatible with iPhones and Androids and can accommodate phones up to 5mm thick.

CMF Watch Pro 2: One minute review

(Image credit: Future)

The CMF Watch Pro 2 is undoubtedly one of the best cheap smartwatches you can buy right now, if not the absolute best pick, and it wins huge points purely for its incredibly affordable price tag.

Despite the cost-saving efforts, it has an impressive design and build and comes with plenty of features that make it a perfect beginner smartwatch for anyone new to the form factor. The screen is perfectly adequate, the software works well enough, and there are myriad smartwatch features including workout tracking, sleep monitoring, GPS, and more.

However, it lacks a couple of key features, including NFC payments, and it can't really be used in water. Also, some of its features, like raise and tap to wake, as well as workout detection, are a little temperamental. Perhaps my biggest issue with it is that I prefer the larger, squircle shape of the previous model, but I've reviewed it here on its own merits.

Nothing still sells both, and it's a big departure from what I believe is the ultimate smartwatch success formula. However, it does deliver some good upgrades, including a better display and more watch faces.

CMF Watch Pro 2: Specifications CMF Watch Pro 2: Price and Availability

(Image credit: Future)

• $69 / £69 / AU$99
• Four colors

The CMF Watch Pro 2 is available now in two colors from Nothing's website as well as from retailers like Amazon. It costs $69 / £69 / AU$99 but does occasionally see discounts of up to 25%.

There's only one size, the 42mm watch face, available in four colors: Blue, Ash Grey, Orange, and Dark Grey pictured here.

Pound for pound, this has to be the best-value smartwatch you can buy on the market right now, considering it's compatible with both iPhone and Android and it has an impressive feature set. It only gets a 5/5 because I can't award a higher score.

• Value score: 5/5

CMF Watch Pro 2: Design

(Image credit: Future)

• Cool circular display
• Divisive change from the 1st-gen
• Solid, premium build

You're going to hear a lot of "for a $69 watch" in the next few minutes. But honestly, for a $69 Watch, the CMF Watch Pro 2 is a really impressive piece of design.

Nothing is famous for making cool-looking tech gadgets, and the CMF Watch Pro 2 is no different. However, we need to talk about the elephant in the room. I'm very much team "smartwatches should be squircle," but the CMF Watch Pro 2 eschews the design of the first CMF Watch Pro in favor of a completely circular design more akin to the Google Pixel Watch 3. It's a big change, and one fans of the first watch might not like. The 42mm display is housed in a 45mm chassis, and the rather thick bezel is tapered towards the middle to create a unique bowl effect.

While the styling is divisive, it's certainly not generic. The digital crown is also premium and feels nice and responsive to use. My only build gripe is the liquid silicon strap, which is pretty thin and not very premium-feeling. That being said, it is comfortable, and I didn't experience much in the way of wrist fatigue during any of my testing.

The bezel is interchangeable, so you can pop it off and replace it with a purchased alternative to change up the style and color of your watch pretty quickly. This is another fairly unique feature that you won't really find on other smartwatches.

(Image credit: Future)

The display is a 1.32-inch AMOLED measuring 466x466. It's a slight upgrade on the previous generation, now putting out 620 nits of peak brightness with a 60fps refresh rate, vs 58Hz and 600 nits in the old one. The display is considerably smaller than the previous model, another divisive change. However, the overall shift makes the watch much smaller in profile, so people with smaller wrists or those who want a more unintrusive experience will prefer this.

The screen has a new auto-brightness feature, as well as five levels you can manually select from. At 620 nits peak, it's not exactly a looker (even the Apple Watch SE 2 puts out 1,000 nits) but it's perfectly adequate. In fact, for a $69 watch, it's definitely a decent display.

Some colors look a little washed out, like the temperature dials on my multifunction face. But colorful faces like the Prismatic Time face definitely have some pop to them. There are some weird pixel-shifting issues I've seen on some of the interfaces, lines that should be straight are wonky in places, but I can't tell if this is a hardware or a software issue. At a glance, it's not really that noticeable.

Durability-wise, the CMF Watch Pro 2 comes with an IP68 water rating. That means it's dustproof and can withstand immersion in up to 1.5 meters of water for 30 minutes. However, Nothing says the Watch Pro isn't suitable for use while swimming, in the shower, saunas, steam rooms, or any kind of water sports or activity. Basically, water is a no-go, which is definitely a key weak spot.

• Design score: 4/5

CMF Watch Pro 2: Features

(Image credit: Future)

• Lots of sports tracking and health metrics
• Bluetooth, GPS, heart rate metrics
• No NFC

For a $69 watch (I won't stop), there's an awful lot going on here. The CMF Watch Pro 2 offers a myriad of features you'd expect to find in a smartwatch, with a couple of key missing features reflective of the price.

Let's start with what you do get. Underpinning most of the best smartwatches these days is health and fitness, and the CMF Watch Pro 2 offers 120 sport modes, as well as five smart recognition activities that can detect your workouts without manual input (I'll get to whether this works in the Performance section). Some exercises even have a warm-up option that triggers a quick slew of animated warm-up stretches and movements before you work out, something you won't even find on any of the best Apple Watches.

Health tracking delivers an Active Score, round-the-clock heart rate and blood oxygen monitoring, sleep tracking, menstrual cycle tracking, step count, calories, resting heart rate, and alerts for abnormal heart rate and blood oxygen.

You also get key features like reminders, music controls, a remote camera control, a calendar, a calculator, and alarms. The Watch Pro 2 works with both iOS (13 and above) or Android (8.0 and above), so you should get plenty of cross-compatibility and synchronization between features like reminders and alarms on your watch and whichever smartphone you use.

You'll also get a Find My Phone feature, flashlight, and a voice assistant functionality, although I found the latter one is a bit of a gimmick, it's supposed to trigger your phone's voice assistant, and while I could see the watch waking up Siri on my iPhone, I couldn't actually ask questions or use it for anything.

Crucially, the Watch Pro 2 lacks NFC, so can't be used to make mobile payments from your wrist, which might be a deal breaker for some.

• Features score: 4.5/5

CMF Watch Pro 2: Performance

(Image credit: Future)

• Decent workout tracking
• Some obvious quirks
• Snappy day-to-day use
• Good battery life

I'll start with the performance positives because there are a couple of quirks with the CMF Watch Pro 2 you should be aware of.

I generally found workout tracking to be consistent. A direct test with my Apple Watch Series 10 for an indoor run measured almost identical readings for distance traveled. The average heart rate was just one bpm off, and the range was pretty much spot-on. As far as workout tracking on a smartwatch can be accurate (the jury is out on just how useful it is generally), I'd say the CMF Watch Pro 2 delivers pretty reasonable accuracy across the board.

I've seen other reviews comment on GPS quirks, but I didn't experience any issues with it. Battery life on the Watch Pro 2 is pretty impressive, rated for up to 11 days of typical use, 9 days of heavy use, or 25 hours using GPS. I've found that generally to hold true in testing, and the battery life is definitely one of the positives.

(Image credit: Future)

While syncing with iOS and my iPhone was generally seamless, it doesn't play nice with Apple's notifications because these are restricted for third-party hardware. As such, iOS Focus modes don't work, one consideration for iPhone users. Notifications are pretty limited in use also, whereas you can respond to them in watchOS on devices like the Apple Watch or Wear OS, all you can do is read and dismiss them here.

As you might have picked up, the CMF Watch Pro 2 runs Nothing's proprietary smartwatch software rather than Wear OS. I actually prefer the look and feel over Wear OS, but like Wear OS, some elements of the UI remain poorly optimized for the circular display. Scrolling and swiping were very snappy overall, and I never experienced any performance lags. In fact, the Watch Pro 2 is noticeably snappier than even the Garmin Instinct 3 I was recently hands-on with.

Throughout my testing, I couldn't get 'raise to wake' to work at all. I even wrote this portion of the review, describing it as the CMF Watch Pro 2's biggest flaw and one that really hobbled the user experience. Then, out of nowhere, the feature began to work perfectly.

Now, whenever I lift my wrist, the watch immediately springs into life. Tap to wake is less reliable, and I've seen other reviews flag that raise to wake is an issue. So while I can no longer say it doesn't work full stop, it is definitely quirky and a problem to watch out for.

Workout detection does work, sort of. While out walking, my watch notified me that I was doing exactly that and asked if I'd like to track the experience. I tapped yes, but the tracker started from zero. Workout detection on Apple Watch is always running in the background, so if you get a detection notice after 10 minutes of walking, that 10 minutes of activity is included in your metrics. The Watch Pro 2 starts from scratch, which isn't exactly how I'd expect workout detection to function. Basically, it's handy if you forget to start your workout and need a reminder.

One final flaw, the vibration motor isn't nice. It resonates at just the wrong frequency and shakes the whole watch with an annoying, high-pitched buzz, it's the only part of the experience that feels cheap.

• Performance score: 3/5

CMF Watch Pro 2: Scorecard CMF Watch Pro 2: Should I buy? Buy it if...

You've never had a smartwatch before

This is a perfect beginner smartwatch, an easy investment to see if using one is for you.

You're on a budget

You'll struggle to find a better smartwatch at this price.

Don't buy it if...

You like water

Nothing warns against use in any kind of water, so this is not the pick if you want a watch you never have to take off.

You want true software synchronization

Both Apple Watch or Wear OS models are going to offer better integration with their respective operating systems

CMF Watch Pro 2: How we tested

I used the CMF Watch Pro 2 over a number of weeks, as a daily smartwatch, during workouts, and more. I tested all of its main features and it was connected to an iPhone for the duration of testing.

CMF Watch Pro 2: Also consider

The original CMF Watch Pro is still fantastic, similarly priced, bigger, and has more battery life. It's a great alternative, as there aren't a ton of improvements in the new one.

Read our full CMF Watch Pro Review

For exactly the same price, this Amazfit offers a similar experience with a more Apple Watch-esque design. It's GPS is impressive and it's light and comfortable, but you won't get the same build quality or workout tracking accuracy. Really, consider this pick vindication that Nothing is king of the cheap smartwatch.

Read our full Amazfit Bip 3 Pro Review

First reviewed: February 2025

MSI Clutch GM41 Lightweight V2: Two-minute review

The GM41 Lightweight is a super simple wired gaming mouse appealing to serious gamers with its light weight and laser-like focus on gaming over extravagant features.

This even extends to its looks. It sports a sleek, low-slung design with little in the way of adornments, or anything to offset the total black colorway. A large RGB light on the body is the only element that brightens up proceedings, which can be customized by holding the DPI button and pressing other buttons or moving the scroll wheel to adjust aspects such as the brightness, mode, speed, and color.

The thin, long shape will likely suit those with long hands, although it might not be wide enough for some. As it’s flat and lower to the ground than many of the best gaming mice, your hand is barely raised from your desktop, which again, some may prefer and some may not. The mouse buttons are relatively flat too, meaning claw grippers might not find them to their liking.

Its texture is smooth all over, save for the rubberized sides that help with grip, but they’re not as sticky as some others are, which I prefer.

The DPI switch is located on the bottom, which isn’t the most convenient, although this does help to keep the GM41 Lightweight as minimal as possible, and prevents mispresses from occurring.

(Image credit: Future)

There’s no removing the braided cable as it's hardwired. It also feels more durable than other braided cables, although it’s not as soft to touch. And while it’s light, it’s not as light as some of those adorning its rivals.

In order to tweak the GM41 Lightweight further, the MSI Center software can be downloaded for free. However, compared to other peripheral software, it’s disappointingly basic.

There are only a handful of rebinding options, including other mouse buttons and a few multimedia functions, but there are no keyboard assignments or system-level functions available. The same is true of performance enhancements. While you can select the increments for DPI cycling, the only other adjustments are for the polling rate, angle snapping, and lift-off distance – the latter of which only features two settings with no distance unit given. Those who like to tinker with their debounce time or toggle motion sync will be left out here.

When it comes to actual gaming, the GM41 Lightweight acquits itself reasonably well. The lightness makes for easy maneuverability, while the mouse clicks are snappy, thanks to their lack of travel. However, this lack of travel also reduces feedback somewhat. This makes spamming clicks harder, as does the relative heaviness of the clicks themselves and that aforementioned flat shape of the buttons. On a more positive note, however, I did find the mouse buttons to be also pleasingly resistant to slam clicks.

The scroll wheel, however, is very fast yet still provides enough notching to make for controlled flicks when needed. The scroll click is a little heavy, however, making it hard to actuate at times, but thankfully, it’s secure enough to prevent accidental mis-scrolls.

(Image credit: Future)

The side buttons are very thin, but light enough to use with ease. They offer slightly more travel than you might expect, but they are satisfyingly damped, making them more enjoyable to use than you might expect.

However, while the cable is light, I found it did create drag when making large swipes. The issue seems to stem from the lack of angle on the strain relief, as it did little to elevate the first portion of the cable from my desktop surface. Depending on the layout of your setup, this might not be an issue, but you may benefit from using the GM41 Lightweight with a mouse bungee.

Thankfully, the PTFE skates allow for smooth gliding on hard and soft surfaces, although they are quite thin, and there’s no spare set included in the box. But if you stick to mouse pads, then you should have no problem moving the GM41 Lightweight around.

If you’re looking for a basic gaming mouse with no extra buttons or features, then the GM41 Lightweight is a solid choice. Its main rivals boast similar prices, such as BenQ’s range of EC mice. However, there are others, such as the Cooler Master MM311 and the Logitech G305 Lightspeed, that are cheaper and offer brilliant gaming performance, all without requiring a cable.

MSI Clutch GM41 Lightweight V2: Price & availability

(Image credit: Future)

• $54 / £29 (about AU$85)
• Available now
• Black only

The GM41 Lightweight costs $54 / £29 (about AU$85) and is available in one colorway: black. It doesn’t come with any replaceable parts, such as grip tape or a spare set of skates.

Its price is in line with other 1K wired gaming mice. The BenQ Zowie EC2-C, which is our pick as the best mouse for CS:GO and CS2, costs about the same. However, that mouse is heavier at 73g, and that’s excluding the cable, but we still found its performance to be excellent.

There are wireless gaming mice for less. The Cooler Master MM311, for instance, is our budget champion and also features a 1K polling rate, although it has no rechargeable battery. Likewise, the Logitech G305 Lightspeed is only marginally cheaper than the GM41 Lightweight, and is our pick as the best wireless gaming mouse for those on a budget.

MSI Clutch GM41 Lightweight V2: Specs Should you buy the MSI Clutch GM41 Lightweight V2? Buy it if...

You want something simple
The stripped-back nature of the GM41 Lightweight means there’s nothing to distract or delay you from gaming – just plug and play.

You want something light
At 65g, the GM41 Lightweight is undeniably lean, which makes fast movements a breeze. There is some drag though, which might be improved with a mouse bungee.

Don't buy it if...

You want extra features
The GM41 Lightweight has no extra buttons besides the usual, and the software doesn’t offer much in the way of customization and tweaking.

You want the best performance
With a 1K polling rate and lack of advanced settings, the GM41 Lightweight might not offer enough precision and tweakability for elite gamers.

MSI Clutch GM41 Lightweight V2: Also consider

Cooler Master MM311
As budget mice go, you’d be hard pressed to do better than the MM311. It offers a 1K polling rate and great performance, yet undercuts many gaming mice on the market, wireless and wired. It doesn’t have a rechargeable battery, though, and at 77g it’s considerably heavier than the GM41 Lightweight, but it could be a better choice for those who prefer no trailing cables to deal with. Read our full Cooler Master MM311 review.

BenQ Zowie EC2-C
The BenQ Zowie EC2-C is an esports champ in our eyes, as it’s the best for shooters like Counter-Strike. It marries excellent performance with a comfortable design, and it’s also available in multiple size variants. However, like the GM41 Lightweight, it only has a 1K polling rate, so those after something more should look elsewhere. Read our BenQ Zowie EC2-C review.

How I tested the MSI Clutch GM41 Lightweight V2

• Tested for several days
• Played various games
• 10+ years PC gaming experience

I tested the GM41 Lightweight for several days, during which time I used it for playing games, productivity, and general use.

In order to push the GM41 Lightweight to its limits, I played fast-paced shooters such as Counter-Strike 2, which is the ultimate test for any gaming mouse.

I have been PC gaming for over 10 years, and have used a large number of mice during that time. I have also reviewed many of them, from budget picks to high-end offerings, all with various shapes, sizes, weights, and feature sets.

• First reviewed: November 2024
• Read more about how we test

Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank review

The Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank is a low-cost portable phone charger compatible with the iPhone 12 – 16. Its list price is $59.99 / £59.99 / AU$93.99 on the official Iniu website; however, discounts are often applied. At the time of writing, a 55% – 57% discount is available, and it's also available for less than the list price at Amazon. Unlike some other brands' power banks, it comes with a USB-C cable and a little travel pouch, providing it a little protection against scuffs and scratches when on the go.

I would argue that the Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank isn’t the most compact example of a MagSafe charger. Its dimensions are 3.8 x 0.9 x 2.7 inches / 97 x 23 x 69mm, which feels quite bulky in one’s hand when trying to continue using a phone as it charges. It feels pretty weighty, too, at 9.2oz / 261g.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future)

The Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank features a super-soft touch matt finish and smooth rounded corners. It offers both MagSafe charging, plus there is a USB-C in/out, and a USB-A out port for wired charging, too. The MagSafe charging area stands proud of the power bank’s surface by roughly 2mm.

The design of the Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank isn’t a far cry from your typical power bank. On the front face of the charger, there is the Iniu logo in the top-right corner, while in the bottom left, there’s an animal paw print that acts as an indicator light to communicate the level of charge remaining in the battery pack.

Charging an iPhone 13 Pro with the Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank proved disappointingly slow, taking three hours and ten minutes to achieve a full charge. To put this in context, it took the similarly priced Anker 633 Magnetic Battery just two hours and fifteen minutes to do the same, plus it has the added bonus of a built-in stand, so it’s easy to continue watching content as your phone charges.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future)

Overall, if you’re not fussed about fast charging and like the novelty of the blue paw print, the Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank wouldn’t be a bad choice. However, there are certainly faster alternatives within the same price range, like the UGREEN Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W, for example, that have novelty value of its own, displaying cute little faces on its screen depending on the level of charge.

So it’s clear the Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank isn’t up to the standard required to feature in our selection of the best wireless chargers or the best iPhone chargers, but it would make an adequate enough purchase if you’re prepared to forgo fast charging speeds.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future) Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank review: Price & specs

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future) Should I buy the Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank? Buy it if…

You don't want any bells or whistles
Aside from the light-up paw print, there's nothing particularly fancy about this charger. There's no built-in stand or LED screen, so if you want something super simple, this charger would prove satisfactory.

You like tactile finishes
One thing I liked about this power pack was the soft matt finish of the material and its nicely rounded corners.

Don't buy it if…

You want to use your phone as it charges
Although marketed as a compact power bank, its depth makes it a little too bulky to be comfortable to hold when attached to your phone. I recommend checking out our pick of the best power banks if you'd like to continue scrolling as you juice up your phone.

You want a built-in stand
Many portable chargers make terrific travel companions, but this power bank sadly isn't one of them. With no stand included, you're limited to lying it flat on a surface to charge, making it hard to binge-watch Netflix during a flight or hotel stay.

Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank review: Also consider

Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank
Not only is this power bank lower in price, it's also slimmer and lighter. It offers similar charging speeds, but would make an ideal alternative for anyone who struggles to put their phone down for extended periods of time. If you'd like to learn more, head over to the full Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank review.View Deal

Saramonic Ultra: one-minute review

The Saramonic Ultra is a portable wireless mic system in the same vein as the popular DJI Mic and Mic 2. Aimed primarily at people who need to create audio and video content on the go – vloggers, podcasters and journalists – the Ultra is available as a package containing two wearable transmitters, one receiver and a portable charging case to keep everything together.

This kit allows for single and dual-channel audio, and the receiver can be connected to a variety of devices for adding high-quality 24-bit sound to recordings. Adapters are included for iPhones, iPads, USB-C smartphones and computers, 3.5mm camera inputs and even for Sony’s Multi Interface Shoe, but the transmitters can also record audio on their own thanks to 8GB of on-board space. When recording directly onto this memory, users can even record 32-bit float audio – a data-rich, high dynamic range format prized by audio professionals.

Saramonic’s build quality doesn’t feel quite as rock-solid as some of the alternatives, but the fact that the transmitter is waterproof to IPX5 levels suggests that the company is doing something right. And, despite the noise cancelling being far from the most effective I’ve encountered with wireless mics, the audio quality is generally excellent in a variety of environments.

The whole kit includes two transmitters, one receiver and a charging case (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen) Saramonic Ultra: Price and release date

• $249 / £259 / AU$449 for 2-Channel Set with receiver, two transmitters and charging case
• Also available with lavalier mics included
• Available now in black and white colour finishes

The Saramonic Ultra is available to purchase in a set that includes two transmitters, one receiver, a charging case, adapters for Lightning, USB-C and Sony Multi Interface, a 3.5mm to 3.5mm cable, two windscreens and a drawstring bag to hold everything. This package is available in a black or white finish and costs around $249 / £259 / AU$449. For a little more money, you can purchase the same package with two cabled lavalier mics included ($299 / £289).

As far as I can see it isn’t possible to buy the individual components separately, or just a transmitter and receiver package (as is available for those who want to save money on a DJI Mic 2, for instance).

That being said, at a price that falls quite a bit below that of premium rivals like the DJI Mic 2 and Rode Wireless Pro, and even below the relatively affordable Sennheiser Profile Wireless, the Saramonic can lay claim to being one of the most affordable higher end wireless mic sets around.

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen) Saramonic Ultra: Specs

The Saramonic Ultra receiver comes with USB-C and Lightning adapters for direct smartphone connection. (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen) Saramonic Ultra: Design

• Most elements slot into charging case for transport
• Entire package weighs 210.5g / 7.4oz
• Adapters for USB-C, Lightning and Sony Multi Interface Shoe included

Like most wireless mic setups, the Saramonic Ultra is centered around two main elements: a small wearable transmitter and an almost as small wearable receiver. The transmitter (of which two are supplied here) has a clip and a strong magnet allowing it to be attached to clothing, with the magnet being best suited to thin garments like t-shirts. It has a USB-C port for charging and data transfer purposes, and a 3.5mm jack for attaching a wired lavalier mic if desired. The transmitters are IPX5 certified too, making them waterproof against rain – something I’ve not seen with rival mics.

The receiver, which links wirelessly to either one or two transmitters, also has a clip, which doubles as a mounting option for sliding into camera cold shoes. It also comes with adapters for Lightning and USB-C devices, and something I haven’t seen on its competitors: an optional antenna to boost its wireless range to 300m (Saramonic claims the range without the add-on is 250m). The receiver also features an OLED touchscreen accompanied by a pressable dial for adjusting settings and viewing gain levels which, while both are small, I had few problems using. Those of a larger fingered persuasion may find them a tad fiddly, however.

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

The supplied charging case has room for both transmitters, the receiver and the Lightning and USB-C adapters for the latter. Unfortunately, there’s no space inside for extras like the transmitter’s windshields or any of the cables. Still, the case, which has a leather-effect texture and a nice light-up logo on top to indicate remaining battery life, is a neat way to carry (and recharge) the core elements of this setup. Its construction is a little creaky compared to that of the DJI Mic 2’s case, but not to the degree I’d be concerned about it falling apart.

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen) Saramonic Ultra: Performance

• Choice of 16, 24 and 32-bit recording
• Transmitters can be used solo
• Noise reduction, Vocal Boost and Low Cut modes

Like the DJI Mic 2 and Rode Wireless Pro, the Saramonic Ultra has an option to record high-quality 32-bit float audio directly onto the 8GB on-board memory of the transmitters. 32-bit float is to standard 16 or 24-bit audio what RAW photographs are to JPEGs – a much larger file size with much more data, allowing for more post-production manipulation of the sound. In my opinion, while it’s a useful option to have, particularly for professional users, the smaller file sizes of the 24-bit audio, and the fact that it can be transmitted wirelessly, means I’d be using 24-bit audio nine times out of ten.

It’s not like the 24-bit audio is bad, either. In fact, it’s nice and crisp, and turning on the Vocal Boost mode lends speech some real heft and body. If you want your voice to sound deeper and more authoritative, it’s probably going to be switched on most of the time. The mic can also be set to record 16-bit audio, which is presumably included as a space-saving option.

Another optional mode is Low Cut, which removes some of the lower frequency noise from recordings, and the three-level noise cancelling mode does reduce background sounds – albeit not to the extent of the highly effective noise cancelling employed by the DJI Mic 2. For example, traffic noise was still very loud in my test recordings, even with Saramonic’s noise cancelling dialled up to its top level.

The attachable furry windshield is a must for outdoor recordings. (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Wind noise is also noticeable on my outdoor recordings, even in relatively calm conditions, which is why the furry windshields should rarely leave the transmitters if you’re using them outside – they do a good job of reducing it.

Gain can be set manually, with the receiver’s screen providing both a live indication of levels and a means for adjustment, but the Auto Gain setting can also be used in trickier, changeable environments. It’ll adjust gain on the fly to compensate for changes in background noise or subject distance from the mic, so it’s ideal for non-studio settings.

There’s no backup recording mode here, so no protection against signal drops. That being said, with the antenna attached you should get a consistently strong wireless signal. I wouldn’t rely it to work perfectly over the 300m maximum range claimed by Saramonic (and I take all manufacturers’ range claims as best-case scenarios) but for the vast majority of users that’s never going to be put to the test. I had no signal issues myself using the microphone while walking around my home, despite walls and floors potentially getting in the way.

Another pro-friendly feature you’ll find here is timecode support, allowing users of multi-camera shoots to easily sync their mics and cameras in post-production. It’s something few people will use, but very handy to have – and of the recent wireless mic launches, this and the Rode Wireless Pro are the only two models that offer it.

Battery life is decent, with around 6 hours of operating time on each transmitter and the receiver, plus an addition 12 or so hours (or two charging cycles) in the charging case. In theory, you can record for around 18 hours in total before needing to find a power socket to recharge.

Should I buy the Saramonic Ultra? Buy it if…

You want an affordable pro-friendly wireless mic

The Saramonic Ultra is packed with useful and often premium features, such as 32-bit float recording, despite being one of the more affordable wireless mic packages around.

You need a waterproof solution

With IPX5-rated water resistance, you could use the Saramonic Ultra’s transmitters in a rainstorm (or even during your morning shower) without fear of damage.

Don’t buy it if…

You want to buy the components separately

The Ultra is only available as a two-transmitter kit supplied with a charging case. So if you need just one transmitter and one receiver and are hoping to save money, you’re out of luck.

You often record in very noisy places

With the on-board noise cancellation tech far from the best around, recording in noisy environments like busy roads can be risky.

Saramonic Ultra: also consider

DJI Mic 2
Packed with pro-friendly features like 32-bit float recording and AI-assisted adaptive noise cancelling, DJI’s second-gen wireless mic is well-built, well-designed, easy to use and more than capable of levelling up your vlogs, interviews, podcasts and other recordings. It also plays nicely with DJI’s camera drones, eliminating propeller noise automatically.

Read our DJI Mic 2 review

Sennheiser Profile Wireless
More affordable than the DJI and Rode alternatives and similarly priced to the Saramonic Ultra, Sennheiser’s wireless microphone set is a great (if slightly lacking in features) one-stop solution for improving vlog audio. Its innovative charging bar even doubles as a handheld mic for interviews.

Read our Sennheiser Profile Wireless review

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen) How I tested the Saramonic Ultra

• Used regularly for a week in both quiet and noisy environments
• Paired with iPhone 13 and Panasonic Lumix GH6

I tested the Saramonic Ultra mic both inside and outdoors, and with its receiver physically connected to devices (my Apple iPhone 13 smartphone and Panasonic Lumix GH6 camera) and in solo mode. I made sure to record in a variety of environments in order to see how the microphone handled different background noises and weather conditions.

• First reviewed: February 2025
• Read more about how we test

Character action single-player games are something of a dying breed or rather only something a handful of developers excel at, often feeling at odds with contemporary expectations of features or content. That's why the announcement of Ninja Gaiden 4 is such welcome news, but it's the surprise shadow drop of Ninja Gaiden 2 Black, a current-gen remaster of Team Ninja's 2008 Xbox 360 title, that makes you truly realize that they truly don't make them like this anymore.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PS5
Available on: PS5, Xbox Series X|S, PC
Release date: January 23, 2025

It's not just here to whet your appetite for the upcoming sequel that's being co-developed by action game extraordinaire PlatinumGames, but goes some way to addressing criticisms over the game's previous remaster in 2021's Ninja Gaiden Master Collection, which was based on the PlayStation 3 Sigma 2 port that purists consider to be inferior.

Arguably, the original 360 game was also unbalanced and a bit broken with an absurd enemy count that would infamously have the frame rate dipping into single digits, so Ninja Gaiden 2 Black is more like the best of both worlds, with Team Ninja doing its best to stay close to the original's vision of gushing, dismembering ultra-violence while still retaining features introduced in Sigma 2. In other words, it's as close to a definitive edition of the game as you can get today.

Old school of hard knocks

(Image credit: Team Ninja/Koei Tecmo)

There is, however, a difference between a definitive and modernised experience. The most modern thing you can say about Ninja Gaiden 2 Black is however its stunning visuals updated in Unreal Engine 5.

Yet despite the impressive modern lighting and effects, there's something uncanny about how stubbornly old-school everything else remains, from its linear level design to Team Ninja's obsession with cleavage, a reminder that this is the team that gave us the Dead or Alive series. You often hear how a new game is described as being like a PlayStation 2 game, but it really puts things into perspective when playing a brand spanking new-looking game that controls exactly like one from the Xbox 360 era.

Quite honestly, I suspect it may turn players who have been accustomed to the smoother controls of Bayonetta (incidentally also a 360-era game, albeit released a year after Ninja Gaiden 2). There are times Ryu Hayabusa seems annoyingly sluggish just trying to get him to turn to face the correct enemy while dodging also requires holding block while shifting the control stick. Or the way your attacks can get easily interrupted by a relentless mob of enemies with the same nuisance of being out-jabbed in a fighting game.

The worst thing is a camera that you're supposed to be able to freely move with the right stick, only until it doesn't. Sometimes you're being ambushed from all sides but unable to correctly get the camera behind you while there's no option to target enemies, which you take for granted these days.

Best bit

Ninja Gaiden 2 Black relies on intricate combos and no quicktime events but the coolest most powerful attack you can pull off is the Ultimate Technique, which simply requires holding down Y/Triangle and then releasing to unleash a deadly flurry of moves that requires no further input. It's also difficult to pull off mostly because enemies come at you faster than you can charge it up. The best part then is that this can also be executed by jumping in the air and then pressing Y/Triangle just as you land.

Playing Ninja Gaiden 2 Black then requires a bit of mental rewiring. Yet once you push through it, there's plenty to appreciate. Already a hardcore game, it's not actually as overwhelming as its reputation gives off.

The absence of a scoring and ranking system in the normal campaign offsets any performance anxiety, while you'll also automatically regain health outside of combat, with the exception of red damage that affects your maximum health. Then there are the deliciously gory cinematic finishers you can perform on any enemy that's already had one of its limbs lopped off, requiring nothing more than a single input.

There's still depth in the different weapons you can unlock and the different combos you can execute, though once I remembered how to pull off the Izuna Drop that just became my go-to. But there's also something so pure to its action – no quick time button-mashing, no parry or stagger mechanics, no indulgently lengthy cinematics, no bosses with multiple health bars and phases – it actually feels refreshing.

Ninja unlocked

(Image credit: Team Ninja/Koei Tecmo)

Like other comparable character action games, Ninja Gaiden 2 Black's campaign only takes around 10-12 hours to complete but it's the additional challenges that add to its appeal, and that doesn't necessarily mean only for those who want to finish on the most punishing Path of the Master Ninja difficulty.

Sigma 2's Tag Missions make a welcome return here, which in the absence of the original's online co-op functionality simply allows you to pick two characters and then switch between them on the fly with a button press. Better yet, the mode's roster of female characters you can pick besides Ryu are all unlocked at the start, while completing the story once unlocks all the missions so you can jump ahead to the toughest challenges if you desire.

Players who do care about how well they play are also catered for with Chapter Challenge, which acts like an equivalent of New Game Plus where you can play any mission with all weapons and spells fully upgraded and where you will receive a rank, with UI flashing up to let you know what high-scoring techniques you've just executed.

Nitpickers may bemoan that not every element cut in the Sigma 2 port is restored but if you're an Xbox owner that original is at least still available to you. For everyone else, this is nonetheless the best way to play a classic action game either on Game Pass or at a reasonable price point. As an action game, I don't think it's a cut above Bayonetta, but it's also so uncompromisingly singular that it's in a class of its own. Bring on Ninja Gaiden 4.

Should you play Ninja Gaiden 2 Black? Play it if...

You like fast-paced action demanding reflexes and combos
Forget stamina bars, this is just about rinsing enemies in as fast and as bloody a fashion as you can.

You don't want to stress about scoring or progression systems
While it offers different playstyles, switching between weapons is flexible and you already have a suite of moves without upgrading. The game is already challenging enough without grading you, which is instead available after completing the story once.

Don't play it if...

You're expecting the remaster to also offer modern gameplay changes
Despite the Unreal 5 glow-up, the game still controls like it did 17 years ago, which will likely cause a level of friction that some players might find too frustrating to get past.

Accessibility features

Although the original game has a reputation for being one of the most difficult games ever made, subsequent releases have provided easier difficulty options. Ninja Gaiden 2 Black adds to this with a 'Hero play style' option that activates the Hero Gauge when your health bar is extremely low. In this state, you'll automatically block or avoid enemy attacks until the gauge runs out or your health is restored.

Elsewhere, you can turn off blood and dismemberment effects, subtitles can be turned on and off, and their size can be adjusted between large, standard, and small with a slider. The game's audio options are English or Japanese, and there are, sadly, no colorblind options.

(Image credit: Team Ninja/Koei Tecmo) How I reviewed Ninja Gaiden 2 Black

I played Ninja Gaiden 2 Black for 15 hours on my PS5 Pro, completing the game once on the default difficulty setting, as well as spending some time replaying some missions in the ranked Chapter Challenge mode and playing as different characters in some of the Tag Missions.

I played on an LG C2 OLED TV, which allowed me to play the game in 120 frames per second, with the default TV speakers and a DualSense Edge controller.

First reviewed February 2025

Garmin Approach S70: One minute review

The Garmin Approach S70 is the brand’s top-tier flagship golf watch and has all the features and performance to match that mantle. Channeling all that makes Garmin watches great for sport, the golf-centered features of the S70 go a long way to put it apart from its competition.

Coming in at $649.99 / £549.99 / AU$1,099 for the larger 47mm model and $699.99 / £599.99 / AU$1,199 for the slightly smaller 42mm, it does have a considerable price of admission, but I broadly think it represents good value and is worth it for those golfers looking to get the most out of a companion watch.

Its design is immediately recognizable as a Garmin watch, and the slick black ceramic of the 47mm size I tested makes for a chic aesthetic, with its sleekness and pop of color provided by the red accenting. The 1.4-inch screen means everything on the watch is easy to read and digest at a glance or in more detail, while the three buttons make it easy to navigate and get around the menus, apps, and features.

The features on offer are excellent too. From the 43,000 pre-loaded courses, to the virtual caddie recommending clubs, all the way to the Enhanced PlaysLike Distance feature which takes into account weather, wind, and topography, players will find plenty to both help their game and get their teeth into to get more out of their game. You can even unlock more features, like green contour data, by subscribing to Garmin Golf. Presented on that beautiful AMOLED display and with fully full-color maps, the watch is a joy to use on the course.

As a pure golf watch, the S70 is, simply, the best golf watch I have ever used. Its suite of features, on top of its wonderful display and established Garmin excellence in golf means that the S70 performs brilliantly. The yardages were accurate (I compared it with another golf watch I find to be accurate too), the new PlaysLike feature is incredibly helpful, and the virtual caddie is super after it’s learned and racked up a bunch of data from your shots.

The battery life is also very strong with the S70. I was able to easily complete two full rounds of 18 holes in GPS mode as well as two weeks’ of day-to-day usage on one charge.

All in all, the Garmin Approach S70 is absolutely one of the best golf watches money can buy right now, and should be at the top of your list if you’re after something that will give you the most bang for your buck, from golf features to battery life, to display.

Garmin Approach S70: Specifications Garmin Approach S70: Price and availability

(Image credit: Future / Rob Dwiar)

• List price of $699.99 / £549.99 / AU1,199 (47mm) / $649.99 / £499.99 / AU1,099 (42mm)
• Premium end of the market but discounts becoming more common
• Launched in May 2023

Given its punchy list price, the Approach S70 is one of the more expensive options on the market and its price tag is formidable; likely putting it out of range for most golfers. However, for those who can afford it, I believe the S70 goes a long way to justify the price tag and offers robust value for those looking at the top end of the golf watch spectrum.

It’s also worth noting that it still costs comfortably less than those super-premium models like the TAG Heuer Connected Calibre E4 Golf Edition and Garmin’s own MARQ Golfer (Gen 2) watch. Thus, as a member of the top-end club, it still comes in much more affordably than those. Equally though, it comes in considerably higher than some excellent budget golf watches such as the Garmin S12 and the new S44.

Even though we’re seeing new watches from Garmin in the S44 and S50, the Approach S70 remains the premium model of the Approach lineup. However, it is also seeing more regular price cuts and discounts, making it even more attractive.

• Value score: 4/5

Garmin Approach S70: Design

(Image credit: Future / Rob Dwiar)

• 1.4-inch AMOLED screen is crisp, bright, and clear
• Two sizes and three colorways available
• Smart and chic aesthetic overall

The Approach S70 very much looks like the best Garmin watches right out of the box, and is a symphony in black ceramic and red trim. It’s a subtle and very agreeable aesthetic for a golf watch. It’s not quite as subtle as a conventional smartwatch, especially alongside the likes of the best Samsung smartwatches – the S70 looks like a chunky sports watch, for sure.

However it is worth noting at this point, that only the 47mm model that I tested comes in this colorway; the smaller 42mm variant comes in either a grey and peach or black and yellow unit, both with a grey strap as opposed to the 47mm’s black strap.

The three buttons on the right side of the S70 make navigation easy, and the screen of the S70 is beautifully crisp and clear making engaging with the features on the course, as well as choosing apps, functions and viewing messages simple.

Garmin’s proprietary charging port remains on the rear of the watch face which I think is a continuing weak point in the design of Garmin watches. This means you’ll always have to have the watch face down on a surface while you press in the connector and leave it to recharge.

Combine this with a cable that never feels quite long enough, and it’s rather an inelegant charging solution, not really befitting the price tag – even if the change to USB-C at the other end of the cable is welcome.

• Design score: 4.5/5

Garmin Approach S70: Features

(Image credit: Future / Rob Dwiar)

• Extensive golf features are superb
• Garmin’s suite of fitness trackers present
• A monthly fee can open up more features

The golf features on offer on the Approach S70 will help out almost every type of golfer, and be incredibly useful. From simply navigating a hole shot-by-shot, to learning more about your game through tracking distances keeping score and marking where to hit shots, to incorporating real-time weather data to help your next shot, the feature-set on offer here is exquisite. The addition of the Enhanced PlaysLike Distance feature is the standout on the S70, meaning you can get accurate assistance on what shots are actually like, given the conditions.

If you want even more out of the Approach S70, you can access further features if you commit to the Garmin ecosystem with a Garmin Golf membership ($9.99 / £9.99 a month). The headline feature you get here is the green contour data you can get, adding further insight and assistance.

On top of the golf-specific stuff, you’re also getting Garmin’s superb range of fitness and sports tracking apps that mean the S70 can turn its hand to a whole host of other activities and workouts.

Throw in some good solid but unspectacular smartwatch functionality, and the S70 does go a long way to tick all the boxes and offer the full package in one watch.

• Features score: 5/5

Garmin Approach S70: Performance

(Image credit: Future / Rob Dwiar)

• Wonderful on-course performance and features
• Great battery life
• Smartwatch performance is just OK

In short, the Approach S70 is the best golf watch I’ve ever tested and used. Its suite of golf features and functions are nearly second-to-none and translate into exceptional use out on the course – and considering it comes preloaded with 43,000 tracks from around the world, you’re going to be able to use it pretty much wherever you go.

Garmin’s excellence in distance accuracy and help with yardages is present once again, with the hole map providing a clear image of what shape the fairway and green are, as well as what hazards are on the hole, and how far away, well, everything is.

After playing some rounds, the shot tracking data is wonderful too, and the virtual caddie element of the watch will be able to provide some help in terms of suggesting clubs. You can also team it with the Garmin Golf App to record all your scores, penalties, and shot types too, as well as mistakes and successes.

Elsewhere, I particularly enjoyed the Enhanced PlaysLike Distance feature that gives you accurate yardage based not only on distance, but also topography (if you’re above or below the hole), wind direction, and weather. I have a good grasp on my yardages generally, but the extra assistance when it comes to external factors was really useful.

(Image credit: Future / Rob Dwiar)

I’ve briefly mentioned the battery life above regarding two weeks’ worth of use, and Garmin’s claims largely hold up. I used the Approach S70 for two weeks, as well as every day as a smartwatch, and threw in two 18-hole rounds of golf in GPS mode, and still had 9% of the battery left. Exceptional.

Practically, however, charging the watch is a little awkward, and is mainly due to Garmin’s proprietary connection. While the USB-C connection is welcome, the oval-shaped connector for the back of the watch is still subject to coming loose – and it also requires the watch to be on its face, all with a cable that never feels as long as it could or should be. I hope this informs future premium models as having a pad-like charging solution like Samsung smartwatches, or even a smart dock like my TAG Heuer has would feel more appropriate for the price tag and experience. Folks will have paid a lot of money for this, after all, so sticking a cable in the back, and awkwardly keeping it face down close to a socket feels a bit cheap.

As a golf-first watch the S70 excels, naturally, but this also shows in its use as an everyday smartwatch and I prefer my TAG Heuer or Samsung Watch3 as a daily smartwatch driver by some distance. One example of my gripes with the S70 as a smartwatch is that my WhatsApp messages wouldn’t be displayed with the most recent one first, so if I received a few messages in a group in quick succession (or even not so quickly) then I was unable to stay on top of the conversation at a glance.

It’ll be interesting to see in the future how the S70 stacks up against its new brethren in the S44 and S50, but the fact remains that it is an excellent golf watch and one that you’ll not regret going for.

• Performance score: 4.5/5

Garmin Approach S70: Scorecard Garmin Approach S70: Should I buy? Buy it if...

You want the best suite of golf features

There’s no denying the S70’s feature set and it packs so much in for golfers who want to get excellent data for their game on their course.

You want a golf watch that can do fitness tracking too

Garmin’s trademark excellent fitness tracking is also present in the S70, so if your desire to track exercise and sport goes beyond just golf, then this is a great watch to get.

You’re already in the Garmin ecosystem

The S70 is an ideal step up if you've tested the waters already with one of Garmin’s budget golf watches and want to embrace something more feature-filled.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You don’t need loads of features

The amount of features on hand in the S70 may actually be overkill for some golfers, and you’ll only get the most out of the watch if you fully immerse yourself in its capabilities.

You want something that’s a slick daily smartwatch

I much prefer using my TAG Heuer golf watch or my Samsung Galaxy Watch as an everyday smartwatch given their looks, styles, and daily functionality.

Also consider

TAG Heuer Connected Calibre E4 Golf Edition

Offering a more premium feel and performance in both golf watch and smartwatch functions, the TAG Heuer Connected Calibre E4 Golf Edition represents stiff but expensive, competition for the S70. If you’re after a super premium golf watch that does it all – and the small expense of some of the S70’s features – then this is the watch to aim for if you have the budget.

Read our full TAG Heuer Connected Calibre E4 Golf Edition review

Garmin Approach S62

The S70s slightly older, less fancy brother still offers an excellent golf watch option from Garmin, having been its flagship golf watch when it was released back in 2022. It’s got a great set of features that will still help your game a couple of years after it came out, and with its moderate age comes increased value for money with its price dropping consistently.

Read our full Garmin Approach S62 review

How I tested the Garmin Approach S70

I used the Garmin Approach S70 over the course of several months, using it for summer and winter golf rounds – and for more rounds than I can remember to put an actual number on. I put all the features to the test in all my rounds and relied on it solely as my only GPS or virtual caddie assist.

Light spoilers follow for Invincible season 3 episodes 1 to 6.

Few superhero shows have been as consistently excellent in recent years as Invincible. The adult animated series has entertained and emotionally stunned Prime Video users – and occasionally made us wince with its extremely graphic violence – since its March 2020 debut. And, as long-time fans (myself included) of its source material will tell you, things will only escalate further as its story progresses.

Pleasingly, Invincible season 3 does a superheroic job of translating its source material's increasingly fraught narrative from page to screen. While lacking in a couple of key areas, the darkest chapter (so far, anyway) of Mark Grayson's story refines and builds on the narrative foundations laid by its predecessors with expert precision, and cements Invincible's position as a torchbearer of R-rated animated storytelling.

The hero within

Season 3's early episodes fully expose the flaws in Mark and Cecil's fragile alliance (Image credit: Amazon MGM Studios/Prime Video)

Three months have passed since Mark (Steven Yeun) was warned that the Viltrum Empire was readying itself to invade and conquer Earth. Since then, the Amazon show's eponymous hero has been training under Cecil Stedman (Walton Goggins) and the Global Defence Agency to prepare for the forthcoming assault.

The best-laid plans often go awry, though, and Mark and Cecil soon find themselves at each other's throats – literally and figuratively. Long story short: when Mark finds out that Cecil has employed, rather than imprisoned, two mass murderers that Mark helped to stop in prior seasons, it leads to a complete breakdown of their working relationship.

Invincible season 3's first poster teased that this would happen, while Invincible 3's official trailer doubled down on this hugely significant plot point. It isn't until the latter half of episode 1 and large swathes of episode 2, though, that non-comic book readers will grasp the full extent of Cecil's perceived multifaceted betrayal of Mark, and the irreparable damage it does to their already uneasy alliance.

Season 3 ups the introspective ante by placing a greater emphasis on the battle waging within Mark

The fallout is so bitter, in fact, that it leads to a Captain America: Civil War-like splitting of the Guardians of the Globe (GotG), aka Earth's most famous superteam, with some of Mark's fellow heroes also walking away from the GotG and GDA over Cecil's apparent duplicity.

Those consequential moments, which play out with an increasingly captivating intensity, are just two instances of the thematically darker undercurrent woven into season 3.

With its visceral levels of ultraviolence and adult themes, Invincible was already a mature and oft-times disquieting take on the superhero formula. Season 3, though, ups the introspective ante by placing a greater emphasis on the battle waging within Mark than ever before. Indeed, one of the best Prime Video shows is no longer just about Mark continuing to grapple with who he is corporeally (i.e., the son of disgraced Viltrumite and near-Earth conqueror Omni-Man/Nolan Grayson (J.K. Simmons)). Now, it's also about planet Earth's most powerful hero struggling with who he has to be versus who he wants to be – or, given his inadvertent involvement in the wanton destruction of Chicago in the final episode of Invincible's first season among other tragic incidents in seasons 1 and 2, whether he's a hero at all.

Cecil is antagonistic in season 3, but he's not a villain in the traditional sense (Image credit: Amazon MGM Studios/Prime Video)

It's a season- and character-defining theme that's similarly explored in a near-perfect adaptation of Cecil's backstory from the comics, which explains his understandable steadfastness and at times questionable choices as the GDA's uncompromising director. "You can be the good guy, or the guy who saves the world," Cecil's mentor tells him during the extensive flashback sequence – a quote that comparably applies to Mark as he persists in wrestling with his own interpretation of heroism, especially after he seemingly killed Angstrom Levy (the first person he's accidentally murdered, FYI) in Invincible season 2 part 2's finale.

Mark's self-examination extends to his tutorship of half-brother Oliver (Christian Convery). With Oliver's abilities manifesting early on in season 3, Mark is thrust into the role of Oliver's mentor-in-chief – an interesting juxtaposition on the student-teacher dynamic Mark shared with Nolan in season 1.

Mark has to deal with a number of familial issues in season 3, too – not least with his half-brother Oliver (pictured left) (Image credit: Amazon MGM Studios/Prime Video)

Oliver's black-and-white worldview and excitable nature (he's still a kid, after all), coupled with his desire to use his powers to save people by any means necessary, though, occasionally puts him at odds with Mark. The conflicts that arise from their opposing perspectives of what it means to be a hero become a fascinating part of what makes this season's primary narrative tick, and forces them to reconsider if their individual points of view are as valid as they first thought.

The conflicts that arise from their opposing perspectives become a fascinating part of what makes this season's primary narrative tick

Away from the familial melodrama, Mark and Eve's 'will they, won't they' dynamic is also central to the duo's individual and collective arcs. Season 3 was in danger of following in its forebears' footsteps and dragging out this out – something that, even as a big fan of Invincible's source material, was starting to irritate me. Thankfully, season 3 stops laboring the point in its second episode, though I would've appreciated it if this had happened as part of an episode's main plot, rather than the afterthought-esque mid-credits scene it's allocated to. Still, the evolution of their romantic relationship throughout this season is an endearing and at-times light-hearted diversion from its weightier material.

Coloring in around the gray(son)

Rex (left) continues to be one of the main beneficiaries of Invincible's TV adaptation righting the wrongs of its source material (Image credit: Amazon MGM Studios)

Key members of Invincible's extensive supporting cast roster also benefit from satisfying character development. Season 3 continues to highlight Rex Splode's (Jason Mantzoukas) growing maturity as a hero and individual, while Debbie's (Sandra Oh) recovery following Nolan's betrayal and Angstrom's brutal attack continues apace with heart-warming aplomb.

Elsewhere, Shrinking Rae (Grey DeLisle) is granted some long-overdue time in the spotlight with her own emotionally driven arc – one of numerous creative deviations from Invincible's literary works that remedy some of its outdated material and gratifyingly flesh out underused characters. Season 3's exploration of other characters' backstories, including a subplot centered around Dupli-Kate (Malese Jow) and twin brother – not to mention newly-introduced villain – Multi-Paul (Simu Liu), though, suggest that other Invincible one-off specials, such as the standalone chapter that laid bare Atom Eve's past, won't be made. That's a pity, too, because there are plenty of side characters with enough history and intrigue surrounding them to star in their own TV specials.

Key members of Invincible's extensive supporting cast roster also benefit from satisfying character development

Nevertheless, the variety of subplots supplement season 3's core storyline to largely satisfying effect, especially ones that directly tie into Mark's moral quandry. Whether it's reintroducing old villains like Titan and Machine Head, dipping its toes into the multiverse once more, or setting up events ahead its final two episodes and already confirmed fourth installment, Invincible crams a lot into its latest eight-episode season, and it juggles them all with a deftness that its contemporaries have sometimes struggled to master.

Atom Eve gets moments to shine from action perspectives as well as emotional ones (Image credit: Amazon MGM Studios/Prime Video)

That said, season 3 doesn't get everything right. For me, there are hugely significant moments that aren't as emotionally impactful in Amazon's TV adaptation as they are in the source material. The previously mentioned Mark and Eve storyline is one, but there are a couple of others, such as a massively important character-defining event for Oliver, which I won't spoil here for non-comic readers, that aren't as potent or don't carry the same weight as they do in the literature. Viewers may also be disappointed that the plot revolving around Nolan and Allen the Alien (Seth Rogen), who are fast becoming everyone's favorite superpowered odd-couple pairing, doesn't get much airtime, either.

There are hugely significant moments that aren't as emotionally impactful in Amazon's TV adaptation as they are in the source material

Season 3 is found lacking in the primary villain department, too. This season, it can be argued that Mark's greatest foe is himself, particularly as he battles his inner demons and guilt, and comes to terms with the fact that any action he takes has grave consequences, either for himself or someone else. The ever-looming threat of the Viltrum Empire is all well and good, as is the tease of a returning enemy, whose reappearance will be a surprise development to anyone who hasn't read the graphic novels.

Powerplex is one of many new villains introduced in season 3 (Image credit: Amazon MGM Studios/Prime Video)

Where past seasons had Nolan and Angstrom, though, Invincible's latest chapter doesn't have its own Big Bad. The closest thing it has to a primary foe is Powerplex (Aaron Paul), a tortured soul/tragic villain seeking vengeance against Mark for – again – reasons I won't ruin ahead of time. What I will say is that Paul absolutely steals the show with a typically powerful performance that spans the emotional spectrum, and may help cement this season's sixth entry as one of the all-time great Invincible episodes. Anyway, with two more chapters to go before season 3 ends, I'm still hopeful that a monstrous foe, be that a Viltrumite warrior or someone else, will show up. After all, the roles of two of season 3's nine new cast members – Jonathan Banks and Doug Bradley – remain a mystery after its first six episodes...

My verdict

Invincible's third season secures the adult animated show's position as the best superhero series on television right now. It's as hyperviolent, action-packed, occasionally funny, and strikingly visual as before (its animation doesn't feel like it's evolved as much as it did between seasons 1 and 2, mind you). Above all else, though, it continues to be an incredibly compelling character drama – one that, with its skilful deconstruction of heroism, carries a greater emotional gravitas than previous seasons. If its final two episodes can stick the superhero landing, I'd suggest that Invincible season 3 is the Prime Video series' strongest installment yet.

Invincible season 3 launches with a three-episode premiere on February 6. New episodes air weekly until this season's finale on March 6.

NZBGet is a free, open-source NZB downloader known for its speed, lightweight design, and extensive configuration options. It’s compatible across desktops (Windows, Linux, Mac) and devices like NAS systems, routers, and media players, making it easy to integrate into nearly any setup. Docker images are also available for popular architectures, allowing for easy deployment across a wide range of systems.

A browser-based interface makes it easy to manage and monitor downloads from any device. For advanced users, NZBGet has automation tools, including support for custom scripts, RSS filters, and RPC API for in-depth configuration to streamline large-scale downloads and automate much of the process.

To access Usenet newsgroups with NZBGet, you’ll need a Usenet subscription.

Check out our best Usenet provider guide for our recommended options.

Features

• Wide compatibility: NZBGet isn’t limited to desktops—it also runs on NAS devices, routers, and media players, allowing it to run with nearly any setup.
• Docker images: Easily deploy NZBGet on a wide range of systems using Docker images for popular architectures.
• Browser-based interface: Manage NZBGet from any browser, making it easy to control downloads from your PC, phone, or tablet.
• Resource-efficient: NZBGet uses as little as 32MB of RAM, ideal for low-powered or older devices without compromising performance.
• Fast downloads with repair capabilities: Includes intelligent PAR (Parity) file verification and multi-core repair, quickly recovering incomplete files and minimizing download issues.
• Advanced automation: Supports custom automation through scripts, RSS filters, and an RPC API for full control over the download process.
• Actively maintained and updated: Regular updates bring new features and optimizations, making NZBGet one of the most modern and up-to-date NZB downloaders.

(Image credit: NZBGet) Performance

NZBGet is one of the fastest NZB downloaders available, performing well even on low-end hardware. It uses minimal resources, making it a solid choice for devices with limited processing power or memory, such as NAS devices, routers, and other low-power systems where efficiency is key.

Features like multi-core repair and automatic retry handling ensure that downloads remain smooth and uninterrupted, even when dealing with incomplete or corrupt files. NZBGet can recover and repair these files in the background without requiring manual intervention.

Installation and Setup

The installation process is straightforward, with versions available for different platforms. On desktops, simply download and run the installer. Setting up on NAS devices or routers requires more technical knowledge, but the official NZBGet website has manuals to guide you through both installation and custom configuration.

Once installed, NZBGet’s browser-based interface makes the initial setup quick and easy. Users can configure download folders, adjust server settings, and customize preferences.

Adding Your Usenet Server Settings:

To begin downloading, you’ll need to add your Usenet server settings. Here’s how to do it:

1. Open NZBGet’s browser Interface: Open NZBGet in your web browser.
2. Navigate to Settings: Click on the "Settings" button in the top menu, then go to ‘NEWS-SERVERS’.
3. Add Server Information: In the "NEWS-SERVERS" enter your Usenet provider's details, including the server address, port, and the username and password for your Usenet account.
4. Test Connection: After entering the server information, click “Test Connection” to make sure NZBGet successfully connects to the Usenet server.
5. Save Settings: Once the connection is successful, click “Save all changes” to store your server settings.

(Image credit: NZBGet) Pricing

NZBGet is free and open-source, with no costs or premium tiers. You can download the software directly from the official website or the NZBGet GitHub page.

Support

Extensive setup guides and documentation are available on the NZBGet website that covers installation, configuration, and troubleshooting. There is also an active NZBGet Discord channel where users can ask questions, share tips, and get support from the community.

Final Verdict

NZBGet is one of the best NZB downloaders, and it’s free. Beginners will appreciate its simple setup and interface, while intermediate and advanced users will like the customizability and automation capabilities. Whether you’re running it on a dedicated NAS, an older PC, or a low-powered device, NZBGet’s performance and flexibility make it a top choice.

Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W review: don't be fooled by its cute expressions, this power bank charges fast Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W review: Quirky but quick, this expressive MagSafe power bank left me smiling Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W review

Although the cute faces of the Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W may not be to everyone's taste, if you're looking for a fast-charging MagSafe power bank with character, this charger was made for you.

The Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W has a list price of $69.99 / £64.99 on the official Ugreen website, but this price is often cut due to regular deals. I have been advised that Ugreen is due to launch this charger in Australia around the beginning of 2025 at a list price of AU$89.99. The Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W can also be purchased at Amazon US but at present, only the 5000mAh version is available at Amazon UK.

Neither super compact nor over-sized, the Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W measures 3 x 0.9 x 4.3 inches / 75 x 23 x 109mm and weighs 8.1oz / 230g, which is pretty average for the best power banks. The surface of the MagSafe charging area appears to be soft-touch silicone, and the rest of the casing is metallic plastic, bar the TFT screen, which stands slightly proud from the back panel of the charger. There's a metal effect stand over the top of the charger which attaches to either side. This stand works well, but I found the marketing photos misleading, as I couldn't angle the Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W to show the display screen when my phone was in situ.

The various emoji faces that appear on the TFT smart display communicate the level of battery left in the power bank; for example, it shows heart eyes when it's at full power, and pulls a somewhat dismayed face when the power is below twenty percent. I feel I must tell you these faces aren't displayed all the time, and I was a little disappointed by the frequency at which they appear. If you're not a fan of this novelty display, you'll be happy to know that the display can be turned off simply by pressing the side button.

I was pleasantly surprised by the charging speed when juicing up an iPhone 13 Pro from 0% - 100%, as the Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W took just under two hours to do this, making it the fasted MagSafe power bank I've tested to date. I found that my phone got a little toasty on a couple of occasions, but nothing too drastic. There were also a few instances when my phone hadn't actually started to charge; I found that I either needed to click the power button again or remove and replace my phone. But, for the most part, there weren't any issues.

This may be down to personal taste, but the combination of fast charging speeds and the novelty of the emoji status symbols make the Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W a worthy candidate to feature in our selection of the best wireless chargers or the best iPhone chargers, in my humble opinion. If this MagSafe power bank isn't singing your tune, then it's worth taking a look at the aforementioned guides, as you may well spot something better suited.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future) Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W review: Price & specs

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future) Should I buy the Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W? Buy it if…

You want fast-charging
You could be forgiven for thinking that Ugreen simply focused on the novelty aspect with this MagSafe power bank, but I'm delighted to say they've created a charger that's as fast as it is cute.

You want something whimsical
It won't be for everyone, but for anyone like me who appreciates anything adorable and eccentric, these emoji battery status symbols will bring a smile to your face.

Don't buy it if…

You want something super compact
I'm not complaining about the size of this power bank, its size and weight are pretty standard, but if you're after a super slim option that's barely noticeable when it's attached to your phone, this isn't the charger for you.

You need total reliability
Now, this may have just been the case with my sample, but it was a shame that my phone didn't always begin to charge after I'd attached it to the MagSafe charging pad. It's worth keeping an eye out for this for the first few uses, just in case.

Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W review: Also consider

Anker 633 Magnetic Battery
Another firm favorite of mine is this MagSafe power bank with its springy integrated stand. It took about fifteen minutes longer to charge the iPhone 13 Pro, but its charging time is still perfectly adequate. Plus, the weight and dimensions of this charger are roughly the same as this Ugreen Uno, but without a smiley in sight.

ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) review

The ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) has a list price of $74.99 / £71.99 / AU$134.99, which may seem expensive to some. However, when compared to the cost of other 3-in-1 MagSafe chargers by the likes of Anker, and indeed some other models from ESR themselves, it's a reasonable price to pay for a speedy and sturdy charger.

In use, the ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) was easy to lift and reposition on my desk. The weight of the stand, helped along by the sturdy metal post, meant that I didn't experience any issues with it toppling over. It did feel like it'd be easier to tip than the Anker MagGo Wireless Charging Station 3-in-1 Stand, however.

I found it a bit frustrating that the charging area is static and cannot be angled for better visibility of my phone screen. The vast majority of the best wireless chargers I've tested so far have had adjustable angles, so I wasn't a fan of this limitation.

The matte finish of the ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) shows fingerprints easily, and they're not easy to remove once they're there. The shiny surface of the circular Qi2 charging area proved to be quite the dust magnet when the phone wasn't in situ, with dust particles being very noticeable on top of the deep black.

As with the ESR's Qi2 3-in-1 Travel Wireless Charging Set, the Apple Watch charger is a separate packaged component that comes within the main charger box. It has a magnetic cover to protect the USB-C connector, which connects to the area at the back of the iPhone charging pad with ease. I wasn't a fan of this in the travel set, as it seemed risky to have such a small and losable component as part of a portable charger; I don't mind it as much in the ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock), though.

When it came to charging speed, I was impressed with how quickly the ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) charged an iPhone 13 Pro and Series 9 Apple Watch. It was able to juice up my Apple Watch from 0%-100% in an hour and 13 minutes, making it much faster than ESR's Qi2 3-in-1 Travel Wireless Charging Set, which took just under an hour longer.

It took an hour and 52 minutes to fully charge an iPhone 13 Pro, which is impressive. But it is lagging a little behind the Anker MagGo Wireless Charging Station 3-in-1 Stand, which took an hour and 38 minutes to charge the same iPhone 13 Pro, and a commendable one hour and 14 minutes to charge up my Apple Watch.

As was the case with the ESR Qi2 Magnetic Wireless Car Charger (HaloLock), the iPhones I tested got warm while charging, but in this case, the watch got rather toasty too. It was also distractingly noisy, making various ticking and whirring noises as it charged, even after repositioning, something I'd never encountered before. My Apple Watch didn't appear to suffer any effects from this, but still, those noises made me nervous.

Overall, though, this charger proved its worth. With its speedy charging times, reassuring stability, and small footprint, it efficiently charges three types of Apple devices and other compatible earbud cases.

If you're interested in looking at alternative chargers, we have curated a selection of the best iPhone chargers and best wireless chargers. Within these guides, we suggest the most suitable option based on different needs, and you'll find plenty of options for charging the best iPhones in both.

(Image credit: Future) ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) review: Price & specs

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock)? Buy it if…

You want to charge three devices without sacrificing space
With the earbuds charging area inlaid in the base, and the iPhone and Apple Watch charging pads located at the top of the stand, this 3-in-1 charger is pleasantly compact, so won't take up too much valuable desk or nightstand space.

You want a quick charge
While this isn't the fastest MagSafe charger I've tested, it still charged devices satisyingly quickly, with the Apple Watch charger fully replenishing the battery faster than the ESR's Qi2 3-in-1 Travel Wireless Charging Set, and the Mous MagSafe Compatible 3-in-1 Portable Charger by just under an hour.

Don't buy it if…

You want to look at things from a different angle
It's a shame that the position of the charging pad is fixed, as it limits you to one viewing angle. The phone can still rotate into landscape mode without issue, but I would have liked to be able to position my phone to make it easier to use as it charged.

You want to keep things clean
Unfortunately, due to the matte finish on the majority of the charger and the shiny surface of the MagSafe charging pad, this charger collects dust and fingerprints for a pastime. This is only a minor issue that may not prove an issue for some, but if this kind of thing gets your goat, this may be a charger to avoid.

ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) review: Also consider

Anker MagGo Wireless Charging Station 3-in-1 Stand
It takes up more space, but its design is aesthetically pleasing, and it offers speedier charging – taking just over an hour to fully charge a Series 9 Apple Watch and an hour and 38 minutes to charge an iPhone 13 Pro. Check out our full Anker MagGo Wireless Charging Station 3-in-1 Stand review to see just why we awarded it four and a half stars.

Redmi Buds 6: Recensione rapida

Gli auricolari true wireless sono diventati un accessorio indispensabile per chi desidera ascoltare musica, effettuare chiamate o seguire contenuti multimediali senza fili e con la massima libertà di movimento. Xiaomi, con la serie Redmi Buds, ha sempre puntato su un ottimo rapporto qualità-prezzo, offrendo dispositivi accessibili ma ricchi di funzionalità. Con i nuovi Redmi Buds 6, il brand cerca di alzare ulteriormente l’asticella, proponendo un doppio driver per una qualità audio superiore, cancellazione attiva del rumore fino a 49 dB e un’autonomia prolungata.

Rispetto ai modelli precedenti, i Redmi Buds 6 migliorano diversi aspetti chiave, come la qualità del suono, la riduzione del rumore e il comfort. Pur mantenendo un prezzo competitivo di circa 43 euro, offrono funzioni avanzate che si trovano solitamente su dispositivi più costosi. Tuttavia, ci sono anche alcune limitazioni da considerare, come la mancanza della ricarica wireless e la scelta di un cavo USB-A a USB-C invece di un più moderno USB-C a USB-C. In questa recensione analizzeremo nel dettaglio tutti i pro e i contro, valutando se i Redmi Buds 6 rappresentano davvero la scelta ideale per chi cerca auricolari economici ma performanti.

(Image credit: Redmi Buds 6) Redmi Buds 6: Design, comodità, ergonomia

I Redmi Buds 6 si distinguono per un design moderno e compatto, progettato per un uso quotidiano confortevole e discreto. La custodia ha una finitura opaca che migliora la presa e riduce le impronte, un dettaglio che la rende più elegante e resistente nel tempo. È disponibile in tre colorazioni: Ivy Green, nero e bianco, permettendo una scelta estetica più ampia rispetto a molti concorrenti nella stessa fascia di prezzo.

Il peso ridotto della custodia (43,2 g con gli auricolari inclusi) la rende facilmente trasportabile in tasca o in una borsa senza risultare ingombrante. Anche gli auricolari, che pesano solo 5 g ciascuno, sono leggeri e ben bilanciati, riducendo la fatica anche durante sessioni prolungate di ascolto.

Per garantire la migliore vestibilità possibile, Xiaomi include punte in silicone intercambiabili in più misure. Questo dettaglio è fondamentale per migliorare sia l’isolamento passivo dal rumore esterno sia il comfort, evitando che gli auricolari si spostino o risultino fastidiosi dopo un uso prolungato. Inoltre, la certificazione IP54 assicura resistenza a polvere e schizzi, rendendoli adatti all’uso in palestra o sotto la pioggia leggera.

Un aspetto da considerare è l’assenza della ricarica wireless, una funzione sempre più diffusa anche in modelli economici. Sebbene comprensibile per un dispositivo dal prezzo contenuto, avrebbe migliorato ulteriormente la comodità d’uso. Inoltre, il cavo incluso è USB-A a USB-C, una scelta che potrebbe risultare meno pratica per chi utilizza principalmente caricabatterie USB-C a USB-C.

(Image credit: Redmi Buds 6) Redmi Buds 6: Applicazione per smartphone

I Redmi Buds 6 sono compatibili con l’app Xiaomi Earbuds, disponibile per Android e iOS, che aggiunge un livello di personalizzazione e controllo avanzato alle cuffie. L’interfaccia è intuitiva e ben organizzata, permettendo di monitorare la batteria sia degli auricolari che della custodia, nonché di regolare impostazioni fondamentali per l’esperienza d’ascolto.

Tra le funzioni principali, spicca la possibilità di personalizzare i comandi touch per ogni auricolare, consentendo di assegnare azioni diverse a tocchi singoli, doppi o prolungati. È possibile, ad esempio, attivare/disattivare l’ANC, gestire la riproduzione musicale, rispondere alle chiamate o attivare l’assistente vocale.

L’app include anche quattro preset EQ per adattare il suono alle preferenze personali:

Bilanciato – un profilo neutro per la maggior parte degli ascoltatori.

Bassi potenziati – ideale per chi ascolta generi come EDM, hip-hop o rock.

Voce enfatizzata – perfetto per podcast, audiolibri e videochiamate.

Alti migliorati – consigliato per generi musicali con strumenti ad alta frequenza, come jazz o musica classica.

Un aspetto molto apprezzato è il supporto al dual device pairing, che permette di collegare due dispositivi contemporaneamente. Questa funzione è particolarmente utile per chi lavora con un laptop e uno smartphone, evitando la necessità di riconnessioni manuali. Ad esempio, si può ascoltare musica dal computer e passare automaticamente alle chiamate in arrivo sul telefono.

L’app offre inoltre strumenti pratici come il test di tenuta delle punte auricolari, che aiuta a verificare la corretta aderenza degli auricolari al condotto uditivo per migliorare isolamento e comfort. Infine, consente di aggiornare il firmware, garantendo che gli auricolari siano sempre ottimizzati con le ultime migliorie software.

(Image credit: Redmi Buds 6) Redmi Buds 6: Isolamento passivo

Grazie al design in-ear, i Redmi Buds 6 offrono un buon isolamento passivo già senza la necessità di attivare l’ANC. La forma ergonomica e il peso ridotto (5 g per auricolare) permettono una tenuta salda e confortevole, riducendo naturalmente il rumore esterno. Questo aspetto è particolarmente utile in ambienti rumorosi, come uffici, trasporti pubblici o palestre, dove un buon isolamento passivo migliora l’esperienza d’ascolto senza dover sempre ricorrere alla cancellazione attiva del rumore.

Un ulteriore supporto all’isolamento è dato dalle punte in silicone intercambiabili, che consentono di adattare gli auricolari alle diverse conformazioni dell’orecchio. L’app Xiaomi Earbuds include inoltre un test di vestibilità, che verifica la corretta aderenza degli auricolari al condotto uditivo e aiuta a scegliere la misura di gommini più adatta. Questo non solo ottimizza l’isolamento acustico, ma migliora anche la resa sonora complessiva, evitando dispersioni di bassi e assicurando un audio più definito.

La leggerezza e la forma compatta delle Buds 6 le rendono ideali anche per l’attività fisica, garantendo stabilità anche durante movimenti intensi, come corsa o allenamenti in palestra.

(Image credit: Redmi Buds 6) Redmi Buds 6: Riduzione del suono ANC

I Redmi Buds 6 offrono una cancellazione attiva del rumore (ANC) fino a 49 dB, un valore notevole per questa fascia di prezzo. Grazie ai quattro microfoni integrati, gli auricolari analizzano i suoni ambientali e li eliminano in tempo reale, migliorando sensibilmente l’esperienza d’ascolto, specialmente in ambienti rumorosi.

Nei test effettuati su voli, trasporti pubblici e uffici affollati, le Buds 6 si sono dimostrate molto efficaci nel ridurre rumori di fondo costanti, come il ronzio dei motori, il brusio delle persone o il ticchettio delle tastiere. Anche se non raggiungono il livello di cancellazione di modelli premium, la loro performance è più che adeguata per la maggior parte degli utenti.

L’app Xiaomi Earbuds consente di regolare l’intensità dell’ANC in base alle necessità, permettendo di scegliere tra più livelli di cancellazione. Questo è utile per trovare il giusto equilibrio tra isolamento e comfort, evitando quella sensazione di pressione auricolare che alcuni utenti avvertono con ANC troppo aggressivi.

Un’altra funzione apprezzata è la modalità trasparenza, che permette di amplificare i suoni ambientali, rendendo più facile ascoltare annunci nei trasporti pubblici o interagire con le persone senza dover rimuovere gli auricolari. La modalità voce migliorata è particolarmente utile per chiamate o conversazioni rapide, enfatizzando il parlato e filtrando il rumore di sottofondo.

Grazie alla combinazione di ANC efficace e modalità trasparenza ben implementata, le Buds 6 risultano ideali sia per chi vuole immergersi completamente nella musica o nel lavoro, sia per chi ha bisogno di rimanere consapevole dell’ambiente circostante.

Redmi Buds 6: Qualità musica

I Redmi Buds 6 offrono una qualità audio sorprendente per la loro fascia di prezzo, grazie all’architettura a doppio driver. Ogni auricolare è dotato di un driver dinamico in titanio da 12,4 mm, responsabile dei bassi potenti e della resa delle frequenze medio-basse, e di un driver piezoelettrico in ceramica da 5,5 mm, che migliora la riproduzione degli alti e la separazione dei dettagli sonori. Questa combinazione, solitamente riservata a modelli più costosi, garantisce un suono ricco e bilanciato, con un’ottima definizione degli strumenti e delle voci.

La mancanza di un equalizzatore personalizzabile può risultare una limitazione per gli utenti più esigenti, che preferiscono regolare manualmente le frequenze in base ai propri gusti. Tuttavia, la qualità audio offerta dal doppio driver compensa questa assenza, garantendo una riproduzione fedele e ben equilibrata.

Nel complesso, le Buds 6 si distinguono per una resa sonora dettagliata e dinamica, rendendole una scelta eccellente per chi cerca auricolari economici senza rinunciare a una buona esperienza musicale.

(Image credit: Redmi Buds 6) Redmi Buds 6: Qualità audio in chiamata

I Redmi Buds 6 sono progettate per garantire una qualità audio in chiamata chiara e affidabile, grazie a un sistema a quattro microfoni con riduzione del rumore AI. Questa tecnologia analizza e filtra i suoni di sottofondo, migliorando la nitidezza della voce e riducendo le interferenze ambientali.

Nei test effettuati in ambienti chiusi, come uffici o stanze silenziose, le Buds 6 garantiscono una trasmissione vocale pulita e naturale, senza distorsioni o eccessiva compressione del suono. All’aperto, in contesti più rumorosi come strade trafficate o luoghi affollati, la riduzione del rumore AI si dimostra efficace nel minimizzare il vento e i rumori di fondo, permettendo all’interlocutore di sentire chiaramente la conversazione.

Un ulteriore vantaggio è la possibilità di utilizzare un solo auricolare per le chiamate, utile per chi preferisce mantenere un orecchio libero per ascoltare l’ambiente circostante.

Queste caratteristiche rendono i Redmi Buds 6 particolarmente adatte a chi utilizza spesso gli auricolari per riunioni di lavoro, chiamate su piattaforme come Zoom o Teams, o semplicemente per conversazioni telefoniche in mobilità, senza preoccuparsi della qualità del microfono.

Redmi Buds 6: Batteria

I Redmi Buds 6 si distinguono per un’autonomia eccellente, superando molti concorrenti nella stessa fascia di prezzo. Gli auricolari offrono fino a 10 ore di utilizzo continuo senza ANC e circa 5 ore con la cancellazione del rumore attiva. Questo permette di coprire un’intera giornata lavorativa o lunghe sessioni di ascolto senza doverli ricaricare frequentemente.

La custodia di ricarica amplia ulteriormente l’autonomia, portandola a un totale di 42 ore, garantendo così diversi giorni di utilizzo senza necessità di collegare il dispositivo alla corrente. Un punto di forza è il supporto alla ricarica rapida, che permette di ottenere fino a 2 ore di riproduzione con pochi minuti di ricarica, una funzionalità particolarmente utile in situazioni di emergenza.

Un aspetto da considerare è la mancanza della ricarica wireless, che avrebbe migliorato ulteriormente l’usabilità, specialmente per chi utilizza caricabatterie wireless con il proprio smartphone o altri accessori. Inoltre, il cavo incluso nella confezione è USB-A a USB-C, una scelta che può risultare meno pratica per chi utilizza principalmente caricabatterie USB-C a USB-C, ormai standard nei dispositivi più recenti.

Nonostante questi piccoli compromessi, i Redmi Buds 6 si confermano tra le migliori opzioni in termini di durata della batteria e velocità di ricarica, offrendo un’ottima esperienza d’uso per chi cerca auricolari affidabili e con una lunga autonomia.

Redmi Buds 6: Confronto con altre varianti

La gamma Redmi Buds 6 include diverse varianti, pensate per soddisfare esigenze e budget differenti. Il modello Redmi Buds 6 Lite è la versione più economica, ma mantiene un buon livello di cancellazione del rumore fino a 40 dB e un driver dinamico da 12,4 mm. La sua autonomia arriva a 7 ore di utilizzo continuo e 38 ore con la custodia.

I Redmi Buds 6 Play sono invece prive di ANC, ma offrono un driver da 10 mm e cinque modalità EQ per personalizzare l’audio. Hanno un’autonomia leggermente superiore, con 7,5 ore di utilizzo e un totale di 36 ore con la custodia.

I Redmi Buds 6 Active presentano un design semi-in-ear, che privilegia il comfort rispetto all’isolamento passivo. Sono dotate di un driver più ampio da 14,2 mm, ma l’autonomia è inferiore rispetto agli altri modelli, con 6 ore di riproduzione continua e 30 ore complessive.

Infine, i Redmi Buds 6 Pro rappresentano la versione più avanzata, con un sistema a triplo driver (11 mm + 2 piezoelettrici), supporto all’audio Hi-Res LDAC e una cancellazione del rumore fino a 55 dB. Questo modello è pensato per chi cerca la massima qualità audio e una cancellazione del rumore superiore.

Redmi Buds 6, ne vale la pena?

I Redmi Buds 6 offrono un equilibrio ideale tra funzionalità avanzate e prezzo accessibile, posizionandosi come una delle migliori opzioni nella loro fascia di mercato. Con un costo di circa 43 euro, questi auricolari garantiscono un’eccellente qualità audio grazie al sistema a doppio driver, una cancellazione attiva del rumore efficace fino a 49 dB e un’autonomia prolungata che permette di affrontare giornate intere senza preoccupazioni.

Alcune mancanze, come l’assenza della ricarica wireless e il cavo USB-A a USB-C anziché un più moderno USB-C a USB-C, avrebbero potuto migliorare ulteriormente l’esperienza d’uso. Tuttavia, considerando la qualità complessiva, queste limitazioni risultano secondarie rispetto ai numerosi vantaggi offerti.

I Redmi Buds 6 sono una scelta consigliata per chi cerca auricolari versatili, performanti e dal prezzo competitivo, senza rinunciare a funzionalità avanzate come l’ANC, la personalizzazione tramite app e il dual device pairing. Un prodotto solido, capace di soddisfare sia chi desidera un’esperienza musicale immersiva sia chi necessita di auricolari affidabili per chiamate e utilizzo quotidiano.

Ragioni per comprare

Audio di qualità con doppio driver

Il sistema a doppio driver (12,4 mm + 5,5 mm piezoelettrico) offre bassi profondi, alti cristallini e ottima separazione sonora.

ANC efficace fino a 49 dB

La cancellazione attiva del rumore riduce significativamente i rumori esterni, migliorando l’esperienza d’ascolto su voli, trasporti pubblici o ambienti affollati.

Autonomia eccellente e ricarica rapida

Le 10 ore di utilizzo continuo e le 42 ore totali garantiscono un’intera giornata di ascolto senza interruzioni.

Ragioni per NON comprare

Manca la ricarica wireless

L’assenza di ricarica wireless può essere un limite per chi possiede uno smartphone compatibile e vuole maggiore comodità.

No supporto a codec avanzati

Manca la compatibilità con aptX o LHDC, limitando la qualità audio per chi cerca un suono ad alta risoluzione su dispositivi compatibili.

No equalizzatore personalizzato

L’app Xiaomi Earbuds offre solo quattro preset EQ, ma manca la possibilità di regolare manualmente le frequenze audio preferite.

Alternative

Se i Redmi Buds 6 non ti convincono del tutto, esistono diverse opzioni valide nella stessa fascia di prezzo o leggermente superiore. Ecco tre alternative da considerare, ognuna con caratteristiche specifiche che potrebbero meglio adattarsi alle tue esigenze.

Huawei FreeBuds SE 2

Questi auricolari semi-in-ear offrono un’ottima ergonomia e una qualità audio equilibrata, con autonomia fino a 40 ore grazie alla custodia di ricarica. Pur non avendo ANC, la loro vestibilità garantisce un discreto isolamento passivo. Sono ideali per chi cerca auricolari leggeri e comodi per un utilizzo quotidiano.

Sony WF-C510

Sony è sinonimo di qualità audio, e i WF-C510 offrono un suono ricco e dettagliato con supporto DSEE, che migliora la resa delle tracce audio compresse. L’autonomia è eccellente, con 10 ore per carica e fino a 30 ore con la custodia. Non hanno ANC, ma compensano con una resa sonora superiore.

SoundPEATS Air3 Deluxe HS

Questi auricolari Hi-Res certificati sono tra i migliori nella loro fascia di prezzo per qualità audio. Supportano il codec LDAC, offrendo una maggiore fedeltà sonora rispetto ai normali SBC/AAC. Sono semi-in-ear, quindi non offrono ANC, ma la loro qualità audio e connettività stabile li rendono un’ottima alternativa.

Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM: two-minute review

Ultra wide-angle zoom lenses are a necessity for landscape, architecture, cityscape and travel photographers. Not only do they allow you to capture wide vistas and, indeed interiors, but they also allow you to get in close to subjects to exaggerate perspective for more dramatic results.

The Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM is a professional ultra wide-angle zoom that provides an incredibly versatile focal range, solid features and great image quality to top everything off.

Being a professional Canon L-Series lens, the 15-35mm comes in at a price that might make the average enthusiast wince. But at $2,400 / £2,400 / AU$3,500, while it certainly is expensive, it's comparatively priced to competitor's f/2.8 ultra-wide zooms, so its price is hardly surprising.

There are less expensive ultra wide-angle zooms in the RF line-up, and for many people the RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM will be more than sufficient, but it's not the flagship option with the faster f/2.8 maximum aperture.

(Image credit: James Abbott)

This is a lens that's designed for use on full-frame cameras to take advantage of the advertised focal length, although APS-C Canon users can still use the lens with an equivalent focal range of 24-56mm. This certainly wouldn’t maximise the full benefits of the lens, but if you intend to upgrade to full-frame it would make the 15-35mm a worthwhile investment.

Throw in features such as weather sealing, optical image stabilization and a short minimum focus distance and this immediately becomes an interesting lens if you shoot any subjects that will benefit from a professional lens offering this wide-angle focal range.

Image quality overall is great, but there's a slight caveat here, and this is becoming increasingly common with mirrorless lenses, and that's a heavy reliance on lens corrections. Import your raw files into Lightroom and you'll see that Lens Corrections are switched on by default for this lens. Turn them off and you get an idea of just how strong the adjustments applied are.

Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM specs Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM: Design

• Quite a heavy lens
• Excellent build quality
• Fast and silent autofocus

There's nothing to be excited about or, indeed, disappointed by when it comes to the design of the 15-35mm. Well, except for the heavier than expected weight of 29.6oz / 840g, when you consider the dimensions are pretty much the average for this type of lens at 3.48x4.99in / 88.5x126.8mm. The lens does, however, balance well with full-frame bodies when shooting handheld.

I'm just thinking back to the early promises that mirrorless cameras and lenses would be smaller and lighter than their DSLR equivalents, and nearly choke on my tea as I write since this isn't the case.

Weight aside, the 15-35mm is undoubtedly built to the high standard you'd expect of an L-Series lens including weather sealing, which is essential for a lens that's aimed, in part, at landscape and travel photographers.

The lens is made up of 16 elements in 12 groups including three aspherical and two UD elements. Plus, it has an 82mm fluorine-coated front element. Externally, there's an AF/MF switch, an Image Stabilization On/Off switch, manual focus and zoom rings alongside a lens control ring at the front end of the lens.

The lens control ring can be programmed to adjust certain settings in-camera if you'd find this useful. For me, it's not useful and could be easily knocked, but that's my personal opinion rather than fact.

Image 1 of 4

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 2 of 4

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 3 of 4

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 4 of 4

(Image credit: James Abbott)

The lens has internal focusing so the front element doesn't rotate, but the zoom isn’t internal so the front of the lens extends as you zoom out from 35mm. An internal zoom would be much neater but would add to the already hefty weight, not to mention it's common for ultra wide-angle zooms around this focal range to be designed this way.

There's no manual aperture ring like many modern lenses, which would be a useful feature for videographers if present. Many lenses in recent years have offered a traditional manual aperture ring for this purpose, so it’s a shame that Canon's flagship wide-angle zoom has omitted what is a popular and useful feature.

(Image credit: James Abbott) Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM: Performance

• Fast and silent autofocus
• Captures sharp images
• Constant f/2.8 maximum aperture

Being a pro-spec lens, the 15-35mm comes with a handful of features you'd expect in a premium Canon L-Series offering. First up there's the constant f/2.8 maximum aperture, which paired with the 5-stop Optical Image Stabilization makes the lens as effective handheld in low light conditions as it is tripod mounted, with the latter being the most likely way for the lens to be used for pro landscape and architecture images.

The f/2.8 aperture is also useful for creative, differential focus, which is ideal for travel photographers. And although this aperture isn’t the best option for astrophotography (larger is better), it's certainly useable and further extends the potential of the lens.

Then there's the fast and silent autofocus and the minimum focus distance of 11in / 28cm. With a wide-angle lens, this can be fantastic for creative shots.

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM: sample images Image 1 of 6

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 2 of 6

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 3 of 6

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 4 of 6

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 5 of 6

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 6 of 6

(Image credit: James Abbott)

Image quality is great overall with decent edge sharpness as well as in the center of the frame. Although, as you’d expect for a lens as wide as this, edge sharpness is lower than the central area.

The 15-35mm relies heavily on lens corrections, whether in-camera when shooting JPEGs or in software when shooting in raw. Considering the price point and pro L-series status, I'm surprised just how heavy the lens corrections are. The lens does, however, produce fantastic sunstars around artificial light sources at medium apertures when shooting at night.

When you load raw files into Lightroom both Remove Chromatic Aberration and Enable Profile Corrections are switched on by default, so this must be programmed into raw files when shooting with the lens.

Switch lens corrections off and even stopped-down shots exhibit a vignette while optical distortion pops back in; slight barrel distortion at 15mm and 24mm, with slight pincushion distortion at 35mm.

Chromatic aberration is minimal but can sometimes be seen along high-contrast edges. Images are sharp overall and look great with lens corrections applied, but for a lens of this price and bearing the coveted L-Series tag, you'd be forgiven for expecting more with no corrections applied.

Should you buy the Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM? Buy it if...

You're a pro landscape photographer

If you're a pro landscape photographer an ultra wide-angle zoom is an essential addition to your kit, and the fast 15-35mm F2.8 will undoubtedly serve you well.

You need a fast maximum aperture

A fast f/2.8 maximum aperture is ideal if you shoot handheld in low light and also if you'd like to use differential focus creatively to emphasize subjects.

You need a tough wide-angle

The 15-35mm features premium build quality and weather sealing, so it ideal for outdoor photographers who can confidently shoot in a range of weather conditions.

Don't buy it if...

You're on a budget

This is an expensive lens so if you can’t quite justify the cost, the Canon RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM is quite a lot less expensive, is an L-Series lens and offers an extra 1mm at the wide end.

You mainly shoot astrophotography

While the 15-35mm can be used for shooting astrophotography, a faster wide-angle prime lens will be a much better option if this is your main purpose for the lens.

You shoot APS-C

If you shoot with an APS-C Canon camera, the 15-35mm has an equivalent focal range of 24-56mm so it's only worth buying if you know you'll be upgrading to full-frame down the line.

How I tested the Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM

• Tested with the Canon EOS R1
• Shot night and landscape photography
• Used both handheld and tripod-mounted

The Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM was only available on a short loan with the Canon EOS R1, so the shooting time was tight and poor weather compounded the challenge. This meant most of my testing occurred around dusk to take advantage of late blue hour, as well as some daytime landscape shots when the weather cleared briefly.

The various features and functions were tested, while shots were taken specifically to check for any optical distortions. One of the main lenses I use with my cameras is a premium 16-35mm f/2.8 which provided a foundation from which to judge the RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM.

The two lenses are made by different manufacturers, so they're different in many ways, but it does provide a level of realistic expectation of features and performance.

• First reviewed February 2025

Nike Pegasus 41: Two-Minute review

(Image credit: Future)

The Nike Pegasus 41 isn't the best running shoe in nearly any of the specialist categories you can think of, and for that reason, it's probably the best shoe for nearly everyone.

The Pegasus 41 is a mainstay, your only dance move, ol' reliable. There's a reason this shoe has been around since 1982. It doesn't have a carbon plate or a super light upper, it's not a race-day shoe or a high-mileage hero with more foam than a mattress. Quite simply, it's the one running shoe that I'd recommend for almost everyone in nearly every situation.

Of course, if you're an experienced runner with multiple shoes in rotation and a bandolier full of Kendal Mint cake, the Pegasus 41 might not be on your radar. Even still, I'd argue it's a brilliant middle-distance everyday trainer and a perfect starting point for beginners and enthusiasts looking to return to running. There's a running shoe for every distance and discipline these days, but if you only ever buy one, I'd probably make it the Pegasus 41.

(Image credit: Future)

I've had the Nike Pegasus 39 for a number of years, variously used for running, the gym, grocery shopping, and beyond. I couldn't quite believe just how much the Pegasus had improved when I first laced on the Pegasus 41.

New for the latest Pegasus is a full-length foam midsole made from Nike's ReactX foam (the first Pegasus to feature it). My 39s definitely feel pretty squashed and battered, so it's great to see Nike boosting overall durability and responsiveness, an upgrade that is immediately evident underfoot.

At any pace, there's a lot more cushioning than I expected with the Pegasus 41. It's not going to offer the ultra-plush ride of the Nike Invincible 3 or the upcoming Vomero 18, but I was pleasantly surprised nonetheless.

The cushioning is loaded towards the heel, as you can probably tell from the profile of the shoe, and this is definitely a shoe engineered more for heel strikers. The heel stack clocks in at 37mm, 4mm more than the previous trainer, a good indicator of how much more cushioning Nike has added.

If you fall somewhere in the middle you should be fine, but anyone running on the forefoot might find the sensation a little strange because there's not much cushioning up front. You do get a forefoot (and heel) Air Zoom unit, but I found this leads to a pretty firm feel at the front. At the back, it works much better.

(Image credit: Future)

The entire upper of the Pegasus 41 is really very comfortable. There's a more breathable mesh compared to previous versions, and something Nike calls the Dynamic Midfoot Fit system. The laces are tied to an internal midfoot band that wraps around your entire foot. The shoe feels really snug and secure from heel to toe and comes laced, out of the box, so you can get running without doing any rewiring.

I also think the Pegasus 41 is unbelievably stylish. I normally wouldn't go for a black colorway, but even the dark option I was sent is a head-turner in my opinion. There are a ton of colorways including the stunning Blueprint and the electric Racer Blue, which is new for 2025.

(Image credit: Future)

You'll find that the Pegasus is a little heavier than other everyday shoes like the Saucony Ride 17, but it's not clunky or cumbersome.

As mentioned, this isn't really a specialist shoe. If you're a runner looking for the softest, plushest ride possible, then there are far squishier and more pliable options on the market. Likewise, if you want something with a bit more rock and responsiveness underfoot, you'll definitely find zippier shoes out there. For races and speedwork, any speed shoe or carbon-plated alternative will give you the edge, and the Pegasus 41 isn't a shoe for lighting up the timesheets.

(Image credit: Future)

During my runs I found the Pegasus 41 to be extremely neutral. The ride is very inoffensive and pretty comfortable, but it doesn't give you a sense of being propelled along the ground. There's certainly a bit more response compared to my Pegasus 39s, and the rocker motion is also a lot more noticeable than that older shoe. Nike has definitely improved the formula relative to that model, though it's still modest compared to the wider market.

It's also noticeably more stable than my previous Pegasus. I found very little lateral movement inside the shoe, and even over bumpier or uneven ground, stability felt very solid.

I'd say for longer distances the Pegasus 41 will probably start to fall off; that firm and thin forefoot just doesn't offer enough cushioning. However, I think it's excellent as a short and middle-distance shoe. While it can't match the best gym shoes on the market, it's also perfectly good for your warmup and stretching, and even a bit of strength and agility work.

The shoe is snug but pretty spacious, I have fairly large feet and didn't feel any cramping in the toe box or any discomfort.

Nike Pegasus 41: price & availability

• $140/£129/$200 AUD 
• Men's and women's options, myriad of colors
• Frequently discounted

The Nike Pegasus 41 is available from Nike.com and a plethora of third-party retailers. Its list price sits at $140 / £129 / AU$200 but even a cursory glance around the web will score you a pretty hefty discount.

There's a huge range of colors, these vary depending on whether you're picking men's, women's, or juniors. There's also an Extra Wide variant for the larger-footed among you. The Pegasus 41 runs true to size, so no need to size up or down.

(Image credit: Future) Nike Pegasus 41: specifications Nike Pegasus 41: Scorecard Should I buy the Nike Pegasus 41?

(Image credit: Future) Buy if it...

This is your first running shoe

With its decent price point, neutral ride, and good comfort, this is a great starter shoe if you're ready to take the plunge and see if running is for you.

You want an everyday trainer

The Pegasus 41 will excel in shorter, everyday runs.

You're a heel striker

There's plenty of cushioning underneath the heel, which makes this an ideal everyday shoe for heel strikers.

Don't buy it if...

You want a specialized running shoe

While it excels at the everyday, there are plenty of options out there with more cushioning, speed, or response if you're a more experienced runner.

You want a shoe for the gym

This is a running shoe at heart, and won't serve you well long-term for weight training, strength and conditioning, or anything that isn't running.

You're a toe striker

This firm toe and bulky heel make this shoe one to avoid for toe strikers.

Also consider

(Image credit: Future)

Saucony Ride 17

The latest iteration of Saucony’s popular all-rounders.

Read our full Saucony Ride 17 review

ASICS Novablast 5

A great daily trainer with more energy return and bounce.

Shop at ASICS

How I tested

I used the Nike Pegasus 41 for a series of longer and shorter runs, including some interval training, over several days.

First reviewed: February 2025

This review first appeared in issue 356 of PC Pro.

Representing the entry point of Qsan’s new NAS appliance family, the XCubeNAS XN5104R offers SMBs a small footprint storage solution with plenty of room to grow. This competitively priced 1U rack NAS presents four hot-swap LFF/SFF SATA drive bays at the front, secretes a pair of NVMe SSD slots inside and teams them up with four 2.5GbE multi-gigabit ports.

A quad-core 2.3GHz Intel Xeon D-1714 CPU sits in the driving seat and is partnered by 8GB of DDR4 which can be expanded hugely to 256GB. There’s room for more network ports, as the spare PCI-E Gen4 slot accepts Qsan’s dual-port 10GbE and 25GbE cards.

A compelling feature of Qsan’s NAS appliances is their enormous expansion potential, and the XN5104R is no exception. Fit Qsan’s SAS3 PCI-E card and you can daisy-chain a mix of external disk shelves for a total of 414 drives and a maximum raw capacity of 9PB.

It may have a small footprint, but the XCubeNAS has huge potential (Image credit: Future)

For deployment, we loaded four 22TB Western Digital Red Pro NAS drives and used the XFinder app to discover the appliance and install the latest QSM software. From the custom setup option, we created a big RAID5 storage pool and, if you install NVMe SSDs, you can assign one or both to a pool as a hybrid cache, which accelerates both read and write operations.

QSM offers plenty of storage management and data integrity features. The ZFS-based OS includes copy-on-write snapshots for NAS shares and iSCSI LUNs, in-line data deduplication, intelligent real-time data tiering and facilities for applying one of three WORM (write once read many) policies to NAS share data. You can use a policy to guarantee nothing already in a share can be modified, set it so that only new files copied to the share have the retention date applied, or stop anything from ever being modified or deleted by applying a WORM forever policy.

The QSM web console is easy to navigate but apps are in short supply, with Qsan only including ones for file and media management, hardware monitoring, antivirus, backup and cloud syncing. It used to offer VPN, SQL database, web services and hypervisor manager apps, but these were dropped from QSM a while ago.

The apps Qsan does provide are easy to use, however. The Backup app manages snapshot scheduling and can secure appliance data to any Rsync-compliant remote appliance, as well as Amazon S3, Alibaba OSS and HiCloud S3 cloud accounts. It can replicate folders between XCubeNAS appliances using the Xmirror service, while the Cloud Sync app handles one-way and two-way sync jobs with Dropbox, OneDrive and Google Drive.

The XN5104R can be remotely managed using Qsan’s XInsight web server (Image credit: Future)

Qsan fans will like the free XInsight app, which offers central management for all their AFA, NAS and SAN appliances. Run as a web service on any Windows host, its web console provides an overview of all activity, storage usage and alert notifications plus quick access to each appliance’s management console.

Performance over 2.5GbE is good.

A share mapped to a Dell PowerEdge R760xs Windows Server 2022 host returned 2.3Gbits/sec and 2.2Gbits/sec for both Iometer sequential and random read and write tests, and the XN5104R delivered identical results in our 2.5GbE IP SAN tests. For the latter, we increased the pressure with a dual 2.5GbE MPIO link to our 1TB iSCSI target and recorded sequential reads and writes of 4.6Gbits/sec and 4.2Gbits/sec, while random operations held firm at 4.6Gbits/sec and 4Gbits/sec.

SMBs looking for a good-value rack NAS appliance with an enormous potential for capacity expansion will find a lot to like about Qsan’s XCubeNAS XN5104R.

It’s light on apps but big on 2.5GbE performance, and Qsan’s QSM software delivers great data integrity and storage management features.

We also ranked the best cloud computing services.

This review first appeared in issue 356 of PC Pro.

The Chromebook Enterprise Flip CB5 comes across as both a reinvention of Asus’ excellent Chromebook Flip CX5 convertible, and as a premium, supersized version of its CM34 Flip. Like the former, it’s a big-screen, 2-in-1 convertible with a metallic shell and a fast Intel Core i5 spec. Like the latter, it’s switched to a squarer display with a 16:10 aspect ratio and 1,920 x 1,200 resolution, only here the screen is a massive 16 inches. Using it as a tablet is a slightly bizarre experience and there’s no USI stylus for notes and doodles. But it’s brilliant used in tent mode for ad hoc presentations or entertainment.

Tent mode is ideal for presentations and entertainment (Image credit: Future)

There’s a lot to like about this design, including the thin “nano-edge” frame around the display, and the way the hinge pitches the rear of the laptop upwards for a more comfortable working position. Compared to many of the plastic-heavy Chromebooks on test, the materials feel premium and the build extremely solid, with the near-black finish looking exceptionally smart. Like the old Flip CX5, it meets MIL-STD-810H certification for durability.

Connectivity goes beyond the usual basics, with two 10Gbits/sec USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 ports, a single USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 port and an HDMI 2 video output, plus a microSD card slot and headphone socket. The keyboard is one of the best on test, with 1.4mm of travel and a fantastic light but slightly clicky feel. There’s little to quibble about with the layout, bar a tiny split left-Shift key and a pint-sized number pad. The touchpad is wider than average, at 128 x 74mm, and although it’s precise don’t expect the glass coating of the best units.

Unlike many Chromebooks, the finish feels premium (Image credit: Future)

Let’s get the bad stuff about the screen out of the way. Like too many Chromebook displays, color depth is poor, covering only 59% of the sRGB gamut and 43% of DCI-P3. You might not notice the difference in isolation, but whack up the brightness and put it next to the Acer Chromebook Spin 714 or the Lenovo IdeaPad 5i Gaming Chromebook Plus and suddenly both stills and video look rather drab. What’s more, the 1,920 x 1,200 resolution can look stretched at this screen size, so this screen doesn’t have the same clarity as you’ll find on the Lenovo. Yet it’s fairly bright, reaching 325cd/m2, and low black levels mean plenty of punchy contrast. This and the sheer size work particularly well for video streaming and gaming, though it’s also easy on the eyes when you’re trying to get some work done: there’s no need to squint on a screen this big.

There’s no need to plug any headphones in, either, at least if you’re not out in public, as the Harman Kardon audio system dishes out good sound at sensible volumes, with great mid-range clarity and even some bass. Throw in sensitive mics and a 1080p webcam that produces crisp and well-exposed video, and you’ve got a fine platform for calls and meetings.

The screen is large, but don’t expect a huge range of vibrant colors (Image credit: Future)

This is one of three laptops on test with the Intel Core i5-1235U processor, and it’s an ideal choice for Chromebook use. It provides more than ample performance across web-based and Android apps, plus basic 3D graphics capabilities, without the expense of the more powerful Core i7 CPUs. The Enterprise Flip CX5 came second in many of our benchmarks, just behind the Core i7-powered Acer Chromebook Vero 514. Where it didn’t it wasn’t far behind, and even the Acer Chromebook Spin 714, with its newer 13th-generation Core i5, couldn’t shake it off. What’s more, battery life is stronger than you might expect with such a big screen, with 11hrs 40mins of 1080p video playback in our tests.

It’s touch and go which is the best of this month’s big-screen Chromebooks; the IdeaPad 5i Gaming Chromebook Plus has the better screen and the lower price, but the Asus has the edge on ergonomics and design. Either way, this is an excellent option whether you’re buying for business or for home.

We've also rated the best gaming laptops.

• View at Dyson US / Dyson UK / Dyson AU

Dyson Car+Boat handheld vacuum: two-minute review

The Dyson Car+Boat is a handheld vacuum with suction and battery life that put other handhelds to shame. The reason for that is that it's not really a handheld at all; it's a V8 bundled with different attachments. At time of writing, it's the only handheld option in the Dyson lineup. I put it to the test to see how it compares to the rest of the best handheld vacuums on the market, and if it's worth the extra investment.

I'll start by making it clear that despite being called the Car+Boat, this is not a wet-dry vacuum – Dyson is just suggesting it would be well suited to that. I don't have a boat, so I tried it out on my Fiat Panda.

Overall, it fared well. The suction is powerful, picking up dust and mud with ease, and – if I unleashed Max mode – also sucking up the many little stones that had collected in my footwells. The dust cup is generously sized and you'll get three attachments bundled in. Of those, the most interesting is a small, motorized head that's perfect for tackling larger, relatively flat surfaces like seat cushions and car mats. The Crevice tool is also essential for getting into narrow gaps. Battery life is far longer than most handhelds, offering up to 50 minutes on a single charge.

The compromise you'll have to make for the extra suction and longer battery is that the Car+Boat is a little bulky and heavy compared to many of today's best car vacuums. I was also annoyed by the fact that the trigger must be continually compressed for use – this is tricky when you're trying to maneuver the vacuum into small, awkward spaces.

It's expensive, although that's partly justified by the excellent performance, and that you're getting the mechanics of a full-sized vacuum. You'll need to weigh up whether it's worth just paying a little more for a Dyson stick vacuum (which, after all, can easily be converted into handheld mode). Alternatively, for less intensive cleaning tasks, there are plenty of far cheaper handhelds on the market.

If you're looking for a more heavy-duty handheld, though, the Car+Boat is a strong choice. It's great for larger cleaning sessions, and I'd especially recommend it to pet owners who need that extra suction, and a dust cup that can handle plenty of hair. That's the short version; read on for my full Dyson Car+Boat review.

(Image credit: Future) Dyson Car+Boat review: price & availability

• List price: $279.99 / £249.99 / AU$449
• Launched: February 2025

The Dyson Car+Boat was announced in late January 2025 and went on sale in the US, UK and Australia at the start of February. It's available direct from Dyson as well as via a selection of third-party retailers. At list price it costs $279.99 in the US, £249.99 in the UK, or AU$449 in Australia. That puts it in the premium price bracket for a handheld vacuum.

It's no surprise that this is an expensive option, but is it worth the extra outlay? It's certainly an excellent handheld. The specs are well above most handheld vacuums, and the design and build quality are high, too. If you're on a budget, there are certainly plenty of cheaper handheld vacuums to choose from. Rival vacuum brand Shark's top handheld model – the Shark UltraCyclone Pet Pro handheld vacuum – is a third of the price at $89.99 / £79.99 (about AU$150).

You'll need to factor in that the Car+Boat isn't really a handheld – it's a full stick vacuum, without its wand and floorhead. That means the mechanics are in line with what you'd get with a full-sized vacuum, and you'll also want to consider if you'd be better off just buying a stick vacuum, when it comes to value for money. The base model for this is the Dyson V8, and prices for that start at $349.99 / £329 / AU$799.

• Value for money score: 3.5 out of 5

Dyson Car+Boat specs Dyson Car+Boat review: design

• Base model is a Dyson V8
• Crevice tool, Combination tool and new handheld tool included
• On the bulky / heavy side for a handheld vacuum

The base model for the Dyson Car+Boat is the Dyson V8 – the only difference is the attachments included. That model launched in 2016, and as a result, you're getting a slightly older configuration and motor here. There are cylones, the motor, dust cup, and removable battery, and the attachments can easily be swapped on and off. The motor spins at 110,000rpm, and there's a whole-vacuum filtration system that can capture 99.99% of particles as small as 0.3 microns.

Operation is via a trigger that needs to be continually depressed, and there are two suction modes (regular and Max), which you can toggle using a switch. The 0.54L dust cup is generous for a handheld, and empties by pulling the whole cyclone array upwards, at which point a flap at the base of the bin will drop open.

Pull the whole cyclone section upwards to empty the generous dust cup (Image credit: Future)

You get three attachments bundled in with the Car+Boat. Two are standard tools included with almost all other Dyson stick vacuums: a long, narrow Crevice tool for getting into tight spaces, and a Combination tool that looks like a wider nozzle with retractible brush surround. (More on these in my Dyson vacuum tools guide.)

The third looks like it's new to the Car+Boat, and it's a small motorized head for cleaning relatively flat surfaces like car seats, boat cushions and car mats. It includes a brushroll, and a cover that will move to sit flush with the surface as you clean, to maintain suction.

The new handheld-specific attachment (left) and Combination tool (right) (Image credit: Future)

It probably goes without saying, but there's no long wand or full-sized floorheads, as you'd get with the regular V8.

Dyson stick vacuum comparison

Because the Car+Boat is essentially a V8, and because all of Dyson's stick vacuums can be used as handheld models, it makes sense to briefly cover how the Car+Boat compares.

The V8 was released in 2016, and at time the launch of the Car+Boat, there are three newer vacuums in the lineup – the Dyson V11, the V15 Detect and Gen5detect – all of which have more powerful motors and longer battery life. There are further design differences: all have a more suction-efficient in-line configuration of bin, wand and motor, all have useful LCD screens to provide information, and all have a slightly simpler and more efficient bin-empty mechanism.

Although the V8 isn't the best Dyson vacuum by specs, it is perhaps the best option for handheld use. It's lighter than all the newer models (considerably so, in some cases), and more compact.

• Design score: 4 out of 5

Dyson Car+Boat review: performance

• Excellent suction and tools work very well
• Slightly bulky in small spaces
• Awkward to keep the trigger compressed in use

I used the Dyson Car+Boat to clean my embarrassingly dirty Fiat Panda, and overall I was impressed. The suction is excellent, picking up mud and dust easily, and even pulling up various small stones that had collected on the carpets. I found the Max mode useful for tackling tougher, more ingrained dirt.

The attachments are useful and, for the most part, very well designed. The Crevice tool is long enough to get right into small gaps like down the side of the seats, and the new motorized tool great for larger, flatter areas. The rotating cover works well to maintain a 'seal' around the roller and maximize suction efficiency. I found myself using the Combination tool the least, but it's still useful to have as an option.

The new motorized tool is great for flatter surfaces (Image credit: Future)

All of these tools are well designed, although not quite perfect. The brushroll can be prone to getting tangled with hair, which isn't a massive issue but is something Dyson has addressed elsewhere – its Hair Screw tool has a conical brushroll that directs hair straight into the dust cup. I think you could use a Hair Screw tool as an effective alternative to this new attachment. I also found the button that locks the brush surround on the Crevice tool into place could be a little fiddly.

The Car+Boat is on the chunky side for a handheld vacuum, and could be awkward for getting into tight spaces. I couldn't use it to dust my dash, for instance, because the motor wouldn't fit far enough under the windscreen, and it was a little tricky to maneuver under the seats, too.

A long Crevice tool gets right into tight corners (Image credit: Future)

My main complaint is that the trigger must be continually pressed in when using the vacuum – there's no clip or switch for continuous running. That's annoying even on a floor vacuum, but doubly so here, where you're trying to shift it at awkward angles spaces. (Dyson has upgraded this to a button on the newest Gen5detect, but none of the others.)

The design is excellent for larger, flatter spaces, however. I also think it'd be a great choice for pet owners, because the suction is powerful enough to handle pet hair, and the dust cup large enough to hold relatively large volumes of it (especially compared to other handhelds). The battery life is also outstanding, but I'll get to that in a second.

• Performance score: 4 out of 5

Dyson Car+Boat review: battery life

• Up to a quoted 50 minutes on one charge; less in Max mode
• Far longer runtimes than the majority of handheld vacuums
• Battery removable and swappable

Battery life is one of the areas where the Car+Boat really stands out from competitors. Dyson quotes a maximum of 50 minutes cleaning on a single charge. That's way above average – most cordless handheld vacuums offer a maximum of 30 minutes of cleaning, but sometimes it's more like 15 minutes. 50 is in line with some of today's best cordless vacuums. Note that Max mode will bleed the battery much faster, but that's to be expected – this mode is really only for tough spot cleans.

On test, I really appreciated this longer runtime. Cleaning cars and furniture is fiddly – it takes time to do it properly, and there's nothing worse than running out of battery halfway through the job, once you've wedged yourself into a footwell. I imagine it's the same with boats.

The battery is removable and swappable, so theoretically if you wanted to extend runtimes further, then you could purchase a spare.

• Battery life score: 5 out of 5

Should you buy the Dyson Car+Boat? Buy it if...

You want to clean large areas
The long battery life and relatively large dust cup (for a handheld) make this model perfect for bigger cleaning jobs.

You're dealing with pet hair
You might not need such powerful suction if you're just clearing dust from your car floors, but if you have molting pets that travel with you, it might be worth the extra investment in a Car+Boat.

Don't buy it if...

You already have a V8
The Car+Boat is just a V8 without the floorhead and wand – so if you have that model (or even a different Dyson one) you could just use that in handheld mode.

You have a small car and are on a budget
If you don't need the long battery, there are lots of alternatives at a far lower price.

How I tested the Dyson Car+Boat

I used the Dyson Car+Boat to clean my Fiat Panda, including seats, carpets, footwells and as many nooks and crannies as I could get into. I also tested it on furniture in my home. I used all the various attachments, and compared it to other vacuums I've tested out in terms of both specs and usability.

Read more about how we test vacuum cleaners

• First reviewed February 2025